The competence-related abilities of women criminal defendants

Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) elicits antinociception in rodents through the central CB1 cannabinoid receptor subtype. In addition. Delta9-THC stimulates the release of dynorphin-related peptides leading to kappa-opioid spinal antinociception. In this work we describe the effect of a mixture of thiorphan (a neutral endopeptidase EC3.4.24.11 inhibitor) and bestatin (an aminopeptidase inhibitor), administered i.c.v., on the antinociceptive effect of peripherally administered delta9-THC in mice. As in the case of morphine or DAMGO ([D-Ala2.N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol]enkephalin), a mu-selective opioid receptor agonist, the mixture of enkephalin-degrading enzyme inhibitors also enhanced the antinociceptive effect of delta9-THC. This effect was blocked by the CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, SR-141,716-A, as well as by naloxone. The kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine, administered i.t., also antagonized the effect of this combination. Similar results were obtained with the mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine after i.c.v. administration. These results demonstrate the involvement of both mu-opioid supraspinal and kappa-opioid spinal receptors in the interaction of both opioid and cannabinoid systems regulating nociception in mice.     

The 'glibenclamide-shift' of centrally-acting antinociceptive agents in mice

Morphine-induced antinociception is antagonized by the K(+)-channel blocker glibenclamide (glyburide; Glib), implicating ATP-sensitive (KATP) K+ channels in the analgesic effect of opioids. The present study examined the generality of this conclusion by measuring the effect of Glib on supraspinal (intracerebroventricular; i.c.v.) antinociception produced by representative mu-opioids and the non-opioids pilocarpine and two alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonists (clonidine and tizanidine) using the mouse tail-flick test. Concurrent administration of Glib (40 micrograms, i.c.v.) produced a significant rightward shift of the dose-response curve of morphine, levorphanol, methadone, pilocarpine, clonidine and tizanidine; a modest, but not statistically significant, rightward shift of the dose-response curves of the mu-selective peptides DAMGO ([D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin) and PL017 ([N-Me-Phe3,D-Pro4]-morphiceptin); and no shift of the dose-response curves of alfentanil, carfentanil, fentanyl, sufentanil, or beta-endorphin. Glib produced a leftward shift of the dose-response curve of etorphine. These data support the involvement of KATP-type K+ channels in mediation of supraspinal antinociception, differentiate Glib-sensitive and Glib-insensitive opioid agonists, and reveal fundamental differences among antinociceptive agents in the extent of demonstrable utilization of this transduction pathway.     

alpha-Adrenoceptor and opioid receptor modulation of clonidine-induced antinociception

1. The antinociceptive action of clonidine (Clon) and the interactions with alpha 1, alpha 2 adrenoceptor and opioid receptor antagonists was evaluated in mice by use of chemical algesiometric test (acetic acid writhing test). 2. Clon produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive action and the ED50 for intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) was lower than for intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration (1 ng kg-1 vs 300 ng kg-1). The parallelism of the dose-response curves indicates activation of a common receptor subtype. 3. Systemic administration of prazosin and terazosin displayed antinociceptive activity. Pretreatment with prazosin produced a dual action: i.c.v. Clon effect did not change, and i.p. Clon effect was enhanced. Yohimbine i.c.v. or i.p. did not induce antinonciception, but antagonized Clon-induced activity. These results suggest that alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenoceptors, either located at the pre- and/or post-synaptic level, are involved in the control of spinal antinociception. 4. Naloxone (NX) and naltrexone (NTX) induced antinociceptive effects at low doses (microgram kg-1 range) and a lower antinociceptive effect at higher doses (mg kg-1 range). Low doses of NX or NTX antagonized Clon antinociception, possibly in relation to a preferential mu opioid receptor antagonism. In contrast, high doses of NX or NTX increased the antinociceptive activity of Clon, which could be due to an enhanced inhibition of the release of substance P. 5. The results obtained in the present work suggest the involvement of alpha 1-, alpha 2-adrenoceptor and opioid receptors in the modulation of the antinociceptive activity of clonidine, which seems to be exerted either at spinal and/or supraspinal level.     

Antinociceptive evaluation of 14 beta-(bromoacetamido)-7,8-dihydro- N(cyclopropylmethyl)-normorphinone in mice

This study evaluated the supraspinal opioid effects of 14 beta-(bromoacetamido)-7,8-dihydro-N(cyclopropylmethyl)-normorphinone+ ++ (N-CPM-H2BAMO) in the mouse acetic acid-induced writhing and tail-flick assays. In the writhing test, N-CPM-H2BAMO produced a time- and dose-dependent antinociception after i.c.v. administration, with a 50% antinociceptive response being obtained with 0.28 (0.19-0.39) nmol when given 10 min before testing. The antinociceptive effect of N-CPM-H2BAMO was antagonized in a dose-dependent manner by the kappa-selective opioid receptor antagonist, nor-binaltorphimine. In the mouse tail-flick assay, N-CPM-H2BAMO failed to produce any antinociception after i.c.v. administration. N-CPM-H2BAMO produced a dose-dependent antagonism of morphine-induced antinociception but not antinociception induced by the delta-opioid receptor agonist [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin. Nor-binaltorphimine (0.3 nmol) at dose that completely antagonized N-CPM-H2BAMO-induced antinociception in the writhing assay did not prevent the antagonistic effect of N-CPM-H2BAMO on morphine-induced antinociception. Therefore, these data indicate that N-CPM-H2BAMO produces antinociception by acting at supraspinal kappa-opioid receptors in the writhing assay, and also acts as a mu-opioid receptor antagonist.     

Competitive and non-competitive NMDA antagonists block the development of antinociceptive tolerance to morphine, but not to selective mu or delta opioid agonists in mice

N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists have been shown to block the development of antinociceptive tolerance to morphine. Assessment of the effects of NMDA antagonists on development of antinociceptive tolerance to selective opioid mu (mu) and delta (delta) agonists, however, has not been reported. In these experiments, selective mu and delta receptor agonists, and morphine, were repeatedly administered to mice either supraspinally (i.c.v.) or systemically (s.c.), alone or after pretreatment with systemic NMDA antagonists. Antinociception was evaluated using a warm-water tail-flick test. Repeated i.c.v. injections of mu agonists including morphine, fentanyl, [D-Ala2, NMePhe4, Gly-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO) and Tyr-Pro-NMePhe-D-Pro-NH2 (PL017) or [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin, a delta agonist, or s.c. injections of morphine or fentanyl, produced antinociceptive tolerance as shown by a significant rightward displacement of the agonist dose-response curves compared to controls. Single injections or repeated administration of MK801 (a non-competitive NMDA antagonist) or LY235959 (a competitive NMDA antagonist) at the doses employed in this study did not produce behavioral toxicity, antinociception or alter the acute antinociceptive effects of the tested opioid agonists. Consistent with previous reports, pretreatment with MK801 or LY235959 (30 min prior to agonist administration throughout the tolerance regimen) prevented the development of antinociceptive tolerance to i.c.v. or s.c. morphine. Neither NMDA antagonist, however, affected the development of antinociceptive tolerance to i.c.v. fentanyl, DAMGO, or [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin. Additionally, MK801 pretreatment did not affect the development of antinociceptive tolerance to i.c.v. PL017 or to s.c. fentanyl. Further, MK801 pretreatment also did not affect the development of tolerance to the antinociception resulting from a cold-water swim-stress episode, previously shown to be a delta-opioid mediated effect. These data lead to the suggestion that the mechanisms of tolerance to receptor selective mu and delta opioids may be regulated differently from those associated with morphine. Additionally, these findings emphasize that conclusions reached with studies employing morphine cannot always be extended to 'opiates' in general.     

Antinociceptive effect of dihydroetorphine in diabetic mice

The antinociceptive potency of dihydroetorphine in diabetic mice was examined. Subcutaneous administration of dihydroetorphine produced a dose-dependent antinociception in both non-diabetic and diabetic mice. The antinociceptive potency of s.c. dihydroetorphine was less in diabetic mice than in non-diabetic mice. The antinociception induced by i.c.v. dihydroetorphine (0.02 microgram) was also significantly less in diabetic mice than in non-diabetic mice. The antinociceptive effects of dihydroetorphine (10 micrograms/kg i.p.) in both diabetic and non-diabetic mice were significantly antagonized by s.c. administration of beta-funaltrexamine, a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist. Furthermore, the antinociceptive effect of dihydroetorphine (10 micrograms/kg i.p.) in non-diabetic mice, but not in diabetic mice, was also significantly antagonized by naloxonazine, a selective mu 1-opioid receptor antagonist. The time course and the potency of the antinociceptive effect of dihydroetorphine (10 micrograms/kg i.p.) in diabetic mice were similar to those in naloxonazine-treated non-diabetic mice. Naltrindole, a selective delta-opioid receptor antagonist, or nor-binaltorphimine, a selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist, had no significant effect on the antinociceptive effect of dihydroetorphine (10 micrograms/kg i.p.) in both diabetic and non-diabetic mice. These results suggest that dihydroetorphine produces an antinociceptive effect through the activation of both mu 1- and mu 2-opioid receptors in mice. Furthermore, the reduction in dihydroetorphine-induced antinociception in diabetic mice, as compared with non-diabetic mice, may be due to the hyporesponsive to supraspinal mu 1-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception in diabetic mice.     

Isolation, characterization and synthesis of a novel paradaxin isoform

Recently our laboratory found that tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception could be completely reversed with intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of a protein kinase A inhibitor, whereas intrathecal (i.t.) administration of the inhibitor produced hyperalgesia in morphine-tolerant mice. In the experiments described here, we sought to characterize further the role of phosphorylation events in supraspinal versus spinal opioid-mediated pain pathways and how such events might be involved in the development of antinociceptive tolerance. Two phosphatase inhibitors were administered centrally to determine whether they affected morphine-induced antinociception in naive or chronically morphine-treated mice. By the i.c.v. route, okadaic acid enhanced morphine-induced antinociception in tolerant mice and produced toxicity by the i.t. route. The calcineurin inhibitor ascomycin had no effect on antinociception following acute or chronic morphine treatment. These results suggest that increased activity of protein phosphatase types 1 and/or 2A in the brain may contribute to the development of morphine tolerance.     

Oligosaccharide release from frozen and paraffin-wax-embedded archival tissues

Rats (Sprague-Dawley), submitted to a mechanical noxious stimulus (paw pressure), were tested to determine 1) the antinociceptive effects of p.o. (200, 400 and 800 mg/kg), i.v. (50, 100, 200 and 300 mg/kg) and intrathecal (i.t.) (100 and 200 micrograms/rat) administrations of paracetamol; 2) the influence of i.t. administered tropisetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist (0.5, 1 or 10 micrograms/rat) on paracetamol-induced antinociception; 3) the influence of indomethacin (25 mg/kg s.c.), naloxone (10 micrograms/rat i.t.) and yohimbine (1 mg/kg i.v.) on the effect of paracetamol (200 mg/kg i.v.) to determine the involvement of prostaglandins, opioids and alpha-2 adrenoceptors. The displacement by paracetamol of radioligand binding to various receptors was also investigated. Paracetamol induced a significant antinociceptive effect after p.o., i.v. and i.t. administration. A total inhibition of the effect of paracetamol, administered p.o. or i.t., occurred at the dose of 0.5 microgram/rat of tropisetron, whereas 10 micrograms/rat of this antagonist was needed to totally inhibit the action of i.v. administered paracetamol. Indomethacin, naloxone and yohimbine failed to modify paracetamol antinociceptive action. In vitro studies failed to show any binding of paracetamol to 5-HT3 and several other receptors and to 5-HT uptake sites. It is concluded that paracetamol has a central antinociceptive effect, based on an indirect involvement of spinal 5-HT3 receptors.     

Selective inhibition of [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin antinociception by supraspinal, but not spinal, administration of an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to an opioid delta receptor

Evidence in vivo has suggested the existence of subtypes of the delta opioid receptor (DOR), which have been termed delta 1 and delta 2. These proposed DOR subtypes are thought to be activated by [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE, delta 1) and [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin (delta 2). Recent work in which an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (oligo) to a cloned DOR was administered by the intrathecal (i.th.) route has demonstrated a reduction in the antinociceptive actions of both i.th. DPDPE and [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin, but not of [D-Ala2, NMPhe4, Gly-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO, mu agonist) in mice. The present investigation has extended these observations by administering the same DOR antisense oligo sequence by the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) route and evaluating the antinociceptive actions of i.c.v. agonists selective for delta, mu and kappa receptors. I.th. treatment with DOR antisense oligo, but not mismatch oligo, significantly inhibited the antinociceptive actions of both i.th. DPDPE and [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin but not of i.th. DAMGO or U69,593 (kappa agonist), confirming previous data. In contrast, i.c.v. DOR antisense oligo, but not mismatch oligo, selectively inhibited the antinociceptive response to i.c.v. [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin without altering the antinociceptive actions of i.c.v. DPDPE, DAMGO or U69,593. The data suggest that the cloned DOR corresponds to that pharmacologically classified as delta 2 and further, suggest that this delta receptor subtype may play a major role in eliciting spinal delta-mediated antinociception.     

Pretreatment with protein kinase C activator phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate attenuates the antinociception induced by mu- but not epsilon-opioid receptor agonist in the mouse

The effects of pretreatment with a protein kinase C activator, phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate, on antinociception induced by i.c.v.-administered mu-opioid receptor agonist (D-Ala2, NMePhe4, Gly(ol)5) enkephalin (DAMGO) or morphine and epsilon-opioid receptor agonist beta-endorphin were studied in male ICR mice. The tail-flick responses were used for antinociceptive tests. I.c.v. pretreatment with phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (50 pmol) for 30 or 60 but not 10 min attenuated antinociception induced by i.c.v.-administered DAMGO. I.c.v. pretreatment with phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (10 and 50 pmol) for 60 min caused a dose-dependent attenuation of DAMGO (19.5 pmol)- or morphine (6.0 nmol)-induced antinociception. The dose-response curve for DAMGO-induced antinociception was shifted to the right by 7.3-fold by i.c.v. pretreatment with phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (50 pmol) for 60 min. However, the i.c.v.-administered beta-endorphin-induced antinociception was not affected by the same pretreatment with phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate. The attenuation of i.c.v.-administered DAMGO- and morphine-induced antinociception by phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate was reversed by concomitant i.c.v. pretreatment with a selective protein kinase C inhibitor calphostin C. These results suggest that activation of protein kinase C by phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate leads to the desensitization of mu-, but not epsilon-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception. These findings also provide additional evidence for differential intracellular modulation on antinociceptive action of mu- and epsilon-opioid receptor agonists.     

Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to the kappa-1 receptor block the antinociceptive effects of delta 9-THC in the spinal cord

Intrathecal pretreatment of mice with an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide directed against the kappa-1 receptor significantly reduced the antinociceptive effects of the kappa receptor agonist U50,488 as well as delta 9-THC, the major psychoactive ingredient found in cannabis. A mismatched oligodeoxynucleotide which contained four switched bases did not block the antinociception produced by U50,488 or delta 9-THC. Furthermore, kappa-1 antisense did not alter the antinociceptive effects of either the mu receptor-selective opioid DAMGO, or the delta receptor-selective opioid DPDPE. By using kappa-1 antisense, we were able to demonstrate that an interaction occurs between the cannabinoids and opioids in the spinal cord.     

Met]enkephalin in the spinal cord is involved in the antinociception induced by intracerebroventricularly-administered etorphine in the mouse

We have recently reported that the antinociception induced by etorphine given i.c.v. is mediated in part by the stimulation of both mu- and epsilon-opioid receptors and the activation of both monoaminergic and opioidergic descending pain control systems. [Xu J. Y. et al. (1992) J. Pharmac. exp. Ther. 263, 246-252]. Since the opioid epsilon-receptor-mediated antinociception induced by beta-endorphin is mediated by the release of [Met]enkephalin and subsequent stimulation of delta-opioid receptors in the spinal cord, the present studies were designed to determine if beta-endorphin-like action is also involved in etorphine-induced antinociception. The tail-flick test was used to assess the antinociceptive response performed in male ICR mice. Etorphine at doses from 5 to 20 ng given i.c.v. produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the tail-flick response. The inhibition of the tail-flick response induced by etorphine given i.c.v. was antagonized by intrathecal pretreatment for 60 min with antiserum against [Met]enkephalin (10 microg), but not with antiserum against [Leu]enkephalin (10 microg) or dynorphin A (1-13) (10 microg). Desensitization of delta-opioid receptors in the spinal cord by intrathecal pretreatment with [Met]enkephalin (5 microg) for 60 min attenuated i.c.v. administered etorphine-induced tail-flick inhibition. However, intrathecal pretreatment with [Leu]enkephalin (5 microg) or dynorphin A (1-17) (0.1 microg) for 60 min did not attenuate i.c.v. administered etorphine-induced tail-flick inhibition. The results indicate that antinociception induced by etorphine given i.c.v. is mediated in part by the stimulation of the epsilon-opioid receptor at the supraspinal sites and by the release of [Met]enkephalin, which subsequently stimulates delta-opioid receptors in the spinal cord.     

Positive and negative cis-acting elements are required for hematopoietic expression of zebrafish GATA-1

BACKGROUND: The Na+,K+-adenosine triphosphatase is a ubiquitous enzyme system that maintains the ion gradient across the plasma membrane of a variety of cell types, including cells in the central nervous system. We investigated the antinociceptive effect of intrathecally administered ouabain and examined its potential interaction with spinal morphine and lidocaine. METHODS: Using rats chronically implanted with lumbar intrathecal catheters, the ability of intrathecally administered ouabain, morphine, and lidocaine and of mixtures of ouabain-morphine and ouabain-lidocaine to alter tail-flick latency was examined. To characterize any interactions, isobolographic analysis was performed. The effects of pretreatment with intrathecally administered atropine or naloxone also were tested. RESULTS: Intrathecally administered ouabain (0.1-5.0 microg), morphine (0.2-10.0 microg), and lidocaine (25-300 microg) given alone produced significant dose- and time-dependent antinociception, but systemic administration of ouabain did not produce such an effect. The median effective dose (ED50) values for intrathecally administered ouabain, morphine, and lidocaine were 2.3, 5.0, and 227.0 microg, respectively. Isobolographic analysis exhibited a synergistic interaction after the coadministration of ouabain and morphine. With ouabain and lidocaine, there was no such evidence of synergism. Intrathecally administered atropine, but not naloxone, completely blocked the antinociceptive effect of ouabain and attenuated its interaction with spinally administered morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecally administered ouabain produces antinociception, at least in part, via an enhancement of cholinergic transmission in the spinal nociceptive processing system. The results of the interaction of ouabain with morphine and lidocaine suggest that modulation of Na+-,K+-electrochemical gradients and thus subsequent release of neurotransmitters in the spinal cord are likely to play important roles in the spinal antinociceptive effect of intrathecally administered ouabain.     

Intrathecally administered baclofen for treatment of children with spasticity of cerebral origin

To determine the relative importance of CCK-A, CCK-B, and opioid receptors in mediating the antinociceptive actions of cholecystokinin, we evaluated the actions of selective agonists and antagonists in the mouse hot plate assay. The agonists used were CCK (1-30 nmol i.c.v.), a CCK-A receptor agonist (SNF9019; 0.3-10 nmol i.c.v.), and a CCK-B receptor agonist (SNF9007; 0.3-10 nmol i.c.v.). The antagonists used were the CCK-A receptor antagonist, L364,718 (12.5 nmol i.c.v.), CCK-B receptor antagonist, L365,260 (2.5-25 nmol i.c.v.), and the nonselective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1 mg/kg s.c.). CCK and its receptor-selective analogues, SNF9019 and SNF9007, resulted in antinociception that was blocked by naloxone, but was not antagonized by L364,718 or L365,260. In contrast, in positive control experiments, the inhibitory effects of CCK, SNF9019, and SNF9007 on gastrointestinal propulsion in mice were antagonized by identical i.c.v. doses of L364,718 and L365,260. We conclude that centrally administered CCK produces antinociception in the mouse hot plate assay via opioid receptors, but independent of CCK-A or CCK-B receptors. It is necessary to speculate that other CCK receptors, not antagonized by currently available selective antagonists, may exist.     

Streptozotocin-induced diabetes selectively enhances antinociception mediated by delta 1- but not delta 2-opioid receptors

We assessed the effect of diabetes on antinociception produced by intracerebroventricular injection of delta-opioid receptor agonists [D-Pen2,5]enkephalin (DPDPE) and [D-Ala2]deltorphin II. The antinociceptive effect of DPDPE (10 nmol), administered i.c.v., was significantly greater in diabetic mice than in non-diabetic mice. The antinociceptive effect of i.c.v. DPDPE was significantly reduced in both diabetic and non-diabetic mice following pretreatment with 7-benzylidenenaltrexone (BNTX), a selective delta 1-opioid receptor antagonist, but not with naltriben (NTB), a selective delta 2-opioid receptor antagonist. There were no significant differences in the antinociceptive effect of [D-Ala2]deltorphin II (3 nmol, i.c.v.) in diabetic and non-diabetic mice. Furthermore, the antinociceptive effect of i.c.v. [D-Ala2]deltorphin II was significantly reduced in both diabetic and non-diabetic mice following pretreatment with NTB, but not with BNTX. In conclusion, mice with diabetes are selectively hyper-responsive to supraspinal delta 1-opioid receptor-mediated antinociception, but are normally responsive to activation of delta 2-opioid receptors.     

Differential contribution of descending controls to the antinociceptive actions of kappa and mu opioids: an analysis of formalin-evoked C-fos expression

In this study, the effect of intracerebroventricular (icv) administration of (5R)-(5 alpha, 7 alpha, 8 beta)-N-methyl-N-[7-(1-pyrrolindinyl)-1- oxaspiro[4,5]dec-8-yl]-4-benzofurnacetamide monohydrochloride (Cl-977) on pain behaviors and on spinal cord fos-like immunoreactivity (FLI) evoked by unilateral formalin injection into the hindpaw of rats was examined. Intracerebroventricular administration of Cl-977 (0.13-13.00 nmol) produced a dose-dependent inhibition of formalin-evoked pain behaviors, with significant inhibition after 1.30, 4.40 and 13.00 nmol. The estimated ED50 for icv Cl-977 inhibition of formalin-evoked behaviors was 0.95 nmol and the Emax was 53%. The inhibitory effect of 4.40 nmol of icv Cl-977 on formalin-evoked behaviors was prevented by either pretreatment with the kappa selective antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (10 or 100 nmol) or coadministration of the opiate receptor antagonist, naloxone (30 nmol). The lowest dose of icv Cl-977 tested (0.13 nmol) produced a 50% reduction in FLI in the superficial laminae but did not inhibit the expression of FLI in any other regions of the spinal cord. The fos-inhibitory effect of low-dose icv Cl-977 in the superficial cord was reversed by coadministration of naloxone (30 nmol). Higher doses of icv Cl-977 that suppressed formalin-evoked behaviors did not inhibit the expression of FLI in any region of the spinal cord. Finally, neither the inhibitory effect of 4.40 nmol Cl-977 on formalin-evoked behaviors nor the formalin-evoked pattern of FLI expression in the spinal cord of rats treated with this dose of Cl-977 was affected by lesions of the dorsolateral funiculus. These results provide the first evidence that supraspinal kappa receptor-mediated antinociception is not dependent on the integrity of the dorsolateral funiculus and may be mediated exclusively at the supraspinal level, suggesting that there are multiple mechanisms through which opioids can evoke antinociceptive effects.     

Logistic regression analysis of twin data: estimation of parameters of the multifactorial liability-threshold model

This study with the rat evaluated the contribution of omega-conotoxin GVIA-(omega-CgTx) and verapamil-sensitive Ca2+ channels in behavioural, antinociceptive and thermoregulatory responses to intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of [D-Ala2,NMePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO), [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE) and dynorphin A-(1-17), which are selective agonists for putative mu, delta and kappa-opioid receptors, respectively. The rats treated with omega-CgTx (8-32 pmol i.c.v.) showed transient, dose-dependent shaking behaviour, hyperalgesia and hypothermia which gradually disappeared within 4 h. The behaviour of the rats was normal by 24 h. Histological examination of brain sections showed morphological alterations of neurons in the hippocampus, medial-basal hypothalamus and pyriform cortex. antinociception, catalepsy and thermoregulatory responses elicited by DAMGO (0.4 and 2.0 nmol) were significantly prolonged and potentiated by verapamil (20 pmol i.c.v. 15 min before) or omega-CgTx (8 pmol 24 h before). Antinociception and hypothermia induced by DPDPE were antagonized by verapamil and omega-CgTx, whereas only omega-CgTx prevented the behavioural arousal observed after DPDPE. Similarly, hypothermia induced by dynorphin A-(1-17) (5.0 nmol) and by the kappa-opioid receptor agonist U50,488H (215 nmol) was antagonized by the two Ca2+ channel blockers but only omega-CgTx prevented the barrel rolling and bizarre postures caused by the opioid peptide.     

Comparison of antinociception induced by supraspinally administered L-arginine and kyotorphin

1. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) or intracisternal (i.cist.) administration of kyotorphin (KTP), an endogenous Met-enkephalin releaser, at 5 micrograms per mouse, and L-arginine (L-Arg), a possible KTP precursor, at 30 micrograms per mouse, elicited antinociception in mice to a similar extent, as assessed by the tail-flick test. 2. Intracisternal preadministration of anti-KTP serum abolished the effect of i.cist. KTP and i.c.v. or i.cist. L-Arg, but not of i.c.v. KTP. 3. The antinociceptive effects of i.cist. KTP and of i.c.v. or i.cist. L-Arg disappeared in reserpinized mice, whereas the effect of i.c.v. KTP was unaffected by treatment of mice with reserpine. 4. Intrathecal (i.t.) phentolamine markedly reduced the antinociception induced by i.cist. KTP and by i.c.v. or i.cist. L-Arg, but not by i.c.v. KTP. 5. Intrathecal methysergide attenuated the antinociceptive effects of i.cist. KTP, but not of i.c.v. KTP and i.c.v. or i.cist. L-Arg. 6. These results suggest that the antinociception produced by i.cist. KTP, but not by i.c.v. KTP, is mediated by the brainstem-spinal noradrenergic and 5-hydroxytryptaminergic systems, and that L-Arg given i.c.v. or i.cist. increases KTP formation in the lower brain, possibly the brainstem, resulting in antinociception mediated by the descending noradrenergic system. Therefore, the regional distribution of KTP receptors and KTP synthetase in the brain does not appear to be common.     

Possible role of nitric oxide in the antinociceptive action of intraventricular bradykinin in mice

The i.c.v. administration of bradykinin (4, 8 and 16 micrograms) induced antinociception in mice which was resistant to naloxone; furthermore, the induction of tolerance to morphine by a single s.c. injection (100 mg/kg, 24 h before test doses of the peptide) did not affect antinociception. Since bradykinin is known to increase nitric oxide (NO) in peripheral tissues, we studied the possibility that its antinociceptive action may be related to NO effects in the central nervous system. Bradykinin effects were antagonized by previous treatment with NG-nitro-L-arginine or concomitant i.c.v. administration of bradykinin and methylene blue. The immediate precursor of NO, L-arginine, which by itself produces analgesia, also reduced bradykinin effects; moreover, tolerance to L-arginine significantly decreased the response to the peptide. These results suggest that NO is involved in antinociception induced by i.c.v. administration of bradykinin.     

Influence of incubation time, inoculum size, and glucose concentrations on spectrophotometric endpoint determinations for amphotericin B, fluconazole, and itraconazole

Antinociception can be produced at the spinal level by activation of opioidergic, noradrenergic, and serotonergic systems. We tested the antinociceptive effects of combined activation of all three systems. Antinociception was assessed in the rat tail-flick test, and drugs were administered via an intrathecal catheter. Morphine, the norepinephrine uptake inhibitor desipramine, and serotonin produced antinociception of their own. The combination of subthreshold doses of morphine 1 microg and of desipramine 3 microg produced pronounced antinociception that was antagonized by yohimbine. The combination of subthreshold morphine with serotonin 50 microg or desipramine with serotonin caused only small antinociceptive effects. When morphine combined with desipramine was decreased to a subthreshold dose, we observed pronounced antinociception when a subthreshold dose of serotonin was added. A complex interaction can be supposed by results obtained with antagonists. The activation of all three neurotransmitter systems with small doses of agonists may represent an effective principle for pain control at the spinal level. IMPLICATIONS: Pain sensations are modulated at the spinal level by opioids, noradrenergic drugs, and serotonin. Using a rat model, we showed that the concurrent use of drugs from each of these classes produces good pain control at doses that should avoid the side effects associated with larger doses of each individual drug.