Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease with poor esophageal body motility

Impaired esophageal body motility is a complication of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In patients with this disease, a 360-degree fundoplication may result in severe postoperative dysphagia. Forty-six patients with GERD who had a weak lower esophageal sphincter pressure and a positive acid reflux score associated with impaired esophageal body peristalsis in the distal esophagus (amplitude <30 mm Hg and >10% simultaneous or interrupted waves) were selected to undergo laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication. They were compared with 16 similar patients with poor esophageal body function who underwent Nissen fundoplication. The patients who underwent Toupet fundoplication had less dysphagia than those who had the Nissen procedure (9% vs.44%; P=0.0041). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory pH monitoring and esophageal manometry were repeated in 31 Toupet patients 6 months after surgery. Percentage of time of esophageal exposure to pH <4.0, DeMeester reflux score, lower esophageal pressure, intra-abdominal length, vector volume, and distal esophageal amplitude all improved significantly after surgery. Ninety-one percent of patients were free of reflux symptoms. The laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication provides an effective antireflux barrier according to manometric, pH, and symptom criteria. It avoids potential postoperative dysphagia in patients with weak esophageal peristalsis and results in improved esophageal body function 6 months after surgery.     

A randomized controlled trial of two methods for collection of sterile urine in neonates

The cause of laryngeal and pharyngeal carcinomas is likely multifactorial. Smoking is an important factor, but mucosal damage from gastroesophageal reflux may also contribute. The purpose of this study was to determine whether gastroesophageal reflux is more common in patients with laryngeal or pharyngeal carcinomas than in those without these malignancies. Over an 8-year period, we correlated the results of clinical and radiographic examinations of the pharynx and esophagus to pH monitoring results in 798 patients with a variety of upper aerodigestive tract symptoms and who underwent both pH monitoring and barium esophagography. In this group, 63 patients (52 men, 11 women) had laryngeal or pharyngeal carcinomas, and 735 patients (319 men, 416 women) had neither malignancy. Abnormal pH findings were defined as a total percentage of esophageal acid exposure time of 6% or more as determined with the esophageal probe, or any reflux event detected with the pharyngeal probe. Thirty-four of 63 patients with carcinomas (54%) had abnormal pH-monitoring results: Esophageal acid exposure was abnormal in 10 patients, pharyngeal acid exposure was abnormal in 7 patients, and acid exposure was abnormal in both areas in 17 patients. Of the 735 patients without malignancies, 365 (50%) had abnormal pH-monitoring results (p > 0.05). In this population of patients, abnormal results of pH monitoring were common, occurring in 399 (50%) of 798 patients, but no significant difference was found between results in those with and without laryngeal or pharyngeal carcinomas. Therefore, our study found that gastroesophageal reflux as shown by pH monitoring was not more common in patients with these malignancies.     

Incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after hyperbaric subarachnoid anesthesia with 5% lidocaine and 5% prilocaine

Laparoscopy causes an increase in intraabdominal pressure and may lead to an increase in gastroesophageal reflux (GER). We designed this study to assess and compare the frequency of GER and tracheal contamination in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and gynecological laparoscopy (LG). We studied 20 LC and 17 LG patients. The pH was measured using monocrystalline antimony pH electrodes positioned in the middle to upper esophagus and on the posterior wall of the trachea distal to the tip of the endotracheal tube. Acid reflux was defined as a decrease in esophageal pH to 4.0 or less. Alkaline reflux was defined as an abrupt increase in esophageal pH of more than 1.0, not associated with previous acid reflux. More than 80% of all patients at baseline had a gastric pH < or = 2. Overall, acid GER alone occurred in 47% patients in the LG group and in 15% patients in the LC group. During recovery, a larger proportion of patients had acid reflux in the LG group (47%) than in the LC group (10%). In contrast, alkaline reflux occurred in 75% of LC patients and 11.7% of LG patients. After cholecystectomy, there is an acute increase in the incidence of alkaline reflux. This alkaline reflux may be due to duodenogastric reflux resulting in an alkaline gastric shift. IMPLICATIONS: We studied the incidence of reflux of stomach contents in patients undergoing laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery for cholecystectomy or gynecology, using pH probes in the esophagus (gullet) and the trachea (windpipe). Acid reflux was very common but did not pass into the trachea. After gallbladder removal, the refluxed material became alkaline.     

Is Barrett's esophagus characterized by more pronounced acid reflux than severe esophagitis?

OBJECTIVE: Barrett's esophagus is related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, only a small fraction of patients with GERD develop Barrett's esophagus. We evaluated whether gastroesophageal acid reflux is more pronounced in Barrett's patients than in patients with moderate or severe endoscopic esophagitis. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of results of esophageal manometry and 24 hour ambulatory pH monitoring performed between 1990 and 1996 at the Leiden University Medical Center in those patients who also underwent endoscopy < or = 3 months before pH-metry. Included were 51 patients with Barrett's esophagus, 30 patients with severe esophagitis, 45 patients with moderate esophagitis, and 24 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Patients with Barrett's esophagus had significantly increased acid reflux time (p < 0.01-0.05) compared to patients with moderate, but not compared to patients with severe esophagitis. Distal esophageal body motility and LES pressure were significantly (p < 0.01-0.05) reduced in patients with Barrett's esophagus compared to patients with moderate esophagitis but not compared to those with severe esophagitis. CONCLUSION: Although acid reflux is increased in patients with Barrett's esophagus and esophageal motility is impaired, other factors apart from acid exposure and motility contribute to the development of Barrett's esophagus.     

Pyloric muscle in asymptomatic infants: sonographic evaluation and discrimination from idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

Nissen fundoplication is now the most common antireflux operation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. This study is a report on the laparoscopically performed floppy Nissen procedure. Two hundred consecutive patients were analyzed (84 women, 116 men, mean age 49 years, mean duration of symptoms 5 years) after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication between 1992 and 1996. The main indications for surgery were daily heartburn, retrosternal pain, and regurgitation demanding continuous medical therapy. Eight patients (4%) had esophageal stricture, and 21 (11%) had Barrett's esophagus with intestinal metaplasia. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, and esophageal manometry before and 3 months after the operation. In addition, a questionnaire was completed an average of 2.2 years (range 1.0-4.6) after the operation. The results of the study were as follows: mortality was zero, and the morbidity rate was 5%. The mean hospital stay was 3.8 +/- 2.8 days, and sick leave was 14.3 +/- 10.4 days. Postoperatively, esophagitis was healed or significantly improved in all but 4 patients (98%), and 24-h pH and lower esophageal sphincter pressure were normal. After 2 years, 87% of the patients had Visick scores of I-II. It is concluded that laparoscopic floppy Nissen fundoplication provides an efficient and safe alternative for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.     

Treatment of advanced gastroesophageal reflux disease with Collis gastroplasty and Belsey partial fundoplication

OBJECTIVE: To examine the factors affecting outcome in patients with advanced gastroesophageal reflux disease. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced gastroesophageal reflux disease and no previous antireflux surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Thirty patients underwent Collis gastroplasty for esophageal lengthening and Belsey partial fundoplication. Seven patients with esophageal stricture and global loss of esophageal body motility who underwent primary esophagectomy and reconstruction were used as a comparison group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptomatic outcome in all 37 patients was assessed by questionnaire at a median of 25 months (range, 5-156 months) after surgery. In a subset of 11 patients undergoing the Collis-Belsey procedure, outcome was measured using 24-hour pH and results of motility studies. RESULTS: The Collis-Belsey procedure was successful in relieving symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in 21 (70%) of the 30 patients. The outcome was excellent or good in 16 (89%) of 18 patients who presented with symptoms other than dysphagia, but only in 5 (42%) of 12 patients with dysphagia (P = .01). The outcome was particularly poor if dysphagia was associated with a previously dilated esophageal stricture. Persistent or induced dysphagia was the reason for failure in all but 1 patient. Results of 24-hour esophageal pH studies were returned to normal in 8 (73%) of 11 patients undergoing postoperative evaluation. Contraction amplitudes in the distal esophagus and the prevalence of simultaneous contractions in these segments did not change after the operation. All 7 patients who underwent primary esophagectomy were classified as having an excellent or good outcome and were relieved of their reflux symptoms, including dysphagia. Six of these could eat 3 meals per day and enjoyed an unrestricted diet. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of the Collis-Belsey procedure in patients with advanced gastroesophageal reflux disease without dysphagia is excellent. It is less so in patients with dysphagia as a preoperative symptom. Esophagectomy can provide a good outcome in patients who have a combination of dysphagia stricture and a profound loss of esophageal motility.     

Use of electron scanning microscopy and technical mechanics methods for determination of prolonged usefulness of Polfix plates after clinical use]

BACKGROUND: The ability of gastroesophageal reflux disease to provoke asthma is controversial. Recent reports have suggested that reflux to the proximal esophagus may be especially likely to aggravate asthma, but the prevalence of proximal reflux in children and adolescents is poorly documented. It is also unclear how sensitive and specific the commonly used tests of reflux, barium swallow, and scintiscan are compared with pH probe studies in young patients. There is limited information on the effectiveness of the combination of H2 blockers and prokinetic agents in controlling reflux in children. OBJECTIVE: There were three objectives in this study: (1) to determine the prevalence of both proximal and distal gastroesophageal reflux in asthmatic children and adolescents; (2) to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of barium swallow and scintiscan studies; and (3) to determine the effectiveness of standard antireflux pharmacotherapy. METHODS: A 24-hour, 2-channel pH probe study was carried out in 79 asthmatic children aged 2 to 17 years. The prevalence of abnormal proximal and distal gastroesophageal reflux was calculated from the findings. In 63 of these patients, barium swallow and Technetium99 scintiscan were carried out and the findings used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of these studies relative to pH probe. In 11 subjects a follow-up, 24-hour pH probe was carried out after at least 3 weeks of therapy with an H2 blocker and prokinetic agent to determine the efficacy of therapy. RESULTS: There was abnormal proximal esophageal reflux in 64.5% of subjects and abnormal distal reflux in 73.4%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of barium swallow were 46.1%, 83.3%, 82% and 51%, respectively. Those of scintiscan were 15%, 72.7%, 50% and 32%, respectively. Of 11 subjects studied by repeat pH probe, 10 had persistent abnormal reflux. CONCLUSION: Abnormal reflux into the proximal esophagus occurs in the majority of asthmatic children with difficult-to-control disease. The barium swallow and scintiscan compare poorly with pH probe in diagnosing reflux. Treatment of reflux with recommended does of H2 blockers and prokinetic agents has a high failure rate, and follow-up studies are essential.     

Design and synthesis of small semi-mimetic peptides with immunomodulatory activity based on myelin basic protein (MBP)

Bile reflux has been implicated in the pathogenesis and malignant degeneration of Barrett's esophagus, but clinical studies in patients with adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus are lacking. Ambulatory esophageal measurement of acid and bile reflux was performed with the previously validated fiberoptic bilirubin monitoring system (Bilitec) combined with a pH probe in 20 asymptomatic volunteers, 19 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) but no mucosal injury, 45 patients with GERD and erosive esophagitis, 33 patients with GERD and Barrett's esophagus, and 14 patients with early adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus. Repeat studies were done in 15 patients under medical acid suppression and 16 patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. The mean esophageal bile exposure time showed an exponential increase from GERD patients without esophagitis to those with erosive esophagitis and benign Barrett's esophagus and was highest in patients with early carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus (P <0.01). Pathologic esophageal bile exposure was documented in 18 (54.5%) of 33 patients with benign Barrett's esophagus and 11 (78.6%) of 14 patients with early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Nissen fundoplication but not medical acid suppression resulted in complete suppression of bile reflux. Bile reflux into the esophagus is particularly prevalent in patients with Barrett's esophagus and early cancer. Bile reflux into the esophagus can be completely suppressed by Nissen fundoplication but not medical acid suppression alone.     

Duodenogastric reflux potentiates the injurious effects of gastroesophageal reflux

Experimental studies have shown that the severity of esophageal mucosal injury in gastroesophageal reflux disease is related to the reflux of both gastric and duodenal juice. The purpose of this study was to determine whether duodenal juice potentiates esophageal injury in patients with reflux disease or, in fact, causes no harm allowing acid and pepsin to do the damage. A total of 148 consecutive patients who had no previous gastric or esophageal surgery underwent endoscopy and biopsy, manometry, and 24-hour esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. Esophageal injury was defined by the presence of erosive esophagitis, stricture, or biopsy-proved Barrett's esophagus. Exposure to duodenal juice, identified by the absorbance of bilirubin, was defined as an exposure time exceeding the ninety-fifth percentile measured in 35 volunteers. To separate the effects of gastric and duodenal juice, patients were stratified according to their acid exposure time. One hundred patients had documented acid reflux on pH monitoring, and in 63 of them it was combined with reflux of duodenal juice. Patients with combined reflux (50 of 63) were more likely to have injury than patients without combined reflux (22 of 37; P < 0.05). When the acid exposure time was greater than 10%, patients with injury (n = 40) had a greater exposure to duodenal juice (median exposure time 17.2% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.006) than patients without injury (n = 5), but there was no difference in their acid exposure (16.9% vs. 13.4%). Patients with dysplasia of Barrett's epithelium (n = 9) had a greater exposure to duodenal juice (median exposure time 30.2% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.04) compared to patients without complications (n = 25), whereas acid exposure was the same (16.4% vs. 15%). Duodenal juice adds a noxious component to the refluxed gastric juice and potentiates the injurious effects of gastric juice on the esophageal mucosa.     

Barrett's esophagus. Clinical review of 26 cases

Barrett's esophagus was diagnosed in 26 men in a five-year period by demonstrating esophageal specialized columnar epithelium in target biopsies obtained at endoscopy or in peroral suction biopsies of the esophageal mucosa. The clinical, radiologic and manometric features of these patients were reviewed retrospectively. Esophageal lesions associated with this epithelium included distal and midesophageal strictures and ulcers, alone or in combination, or simply esophagitis. One patient had an associated adenocarcinoma. Twenty of 26 (77%) had heartburn or regurgitation, 16 (62%) had easily elicited reflux of barium while supine and 16 of 17 tested had lower esophageal sphincter pressure in the incompetent range. Ninety-six percent had one or more of these parameters positive. This series demonstrates a wide spectrum of esophageal lesions in Barrett's esophagus, and supports the concept that this lesion occurs as a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux and erosive esophagitis. The case of adenocarcinoma in this series adds to the concern that the columnar lined lower esophagus may be a premalignant lesion.     

The molecular pathology of urological malignancies

BACKGROUND: Effective esophageal peristalsis is a major determinant of esophageal clearance function. The relation of esophageal body function with a mechanically defective lower esophageal sphincter and the development of esophageal mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed the relations among the manometrically determined esophageal clearance function, lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction, esophageal acid exposure, and the presence and severity of esophageal mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Normal values for the manometric assessment of esophageal clearance function were established in 50 normal volunteers and subsequently applied to 160 symptomatic patients with increased esophageal exposure to gastric juice and various grades of esophageal mucosal injury (no minimal surgery, esophagitis, stricture, and Barrett's esophagus). RESULTS: Defective clearance function was present in 47.5% of the patients; a defective lower esophageal sphincter was documented in 63.1%. Compromised esophageal clearance function was significantly more common in patients with a defective lower esophageal sphincter than in those with normal sphincter function (55% versus 33.8%). Esophageal acid exposure time and the prevalence and severity of esophageal mucosal injury were highest in patients with a defective sphincter and compromised clearance function. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that esophageal motor function deteriorates with increasing severity of mucosal injury. This appears to be due to persistent reflux of gastric juice across a mechanically defective lower esophageal sphincter. This may influence the choice and outcome of antireflux surgery. Surgical correction of a mechanically defective sphincter before the loss of esophageal body function is advocated.     

Effect of pneumatic dilation on gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia

The aims of this study were to assess the effect of pneumatic dilation on gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia, differentiate esophageal acid due to lactate from acid due to gastroesophageal reflux, and determine if chest pain and heartburn are reliable indicators of gastroesophageal reflux. Eight untreated achalasia patients underwent pre- and postdilation esophageal fluid/food residue lactate and pH analysis, esophageal manometry, 24-hr pH monitoring, and symptom assessment. All patients had a successful clinical outcome and a decrease in lower esophageal sphincter pressure from 29.1 +/- 12.7 to 14.7 +/- 3.8 mm Hg (mean +/- SD; P = 0.04). Abnormal acid exposure was present in two patients before and two patients after dilation. Postdilation acid exposure was mild. Lactate was detected before dilation in all patients. A lactate concentration >2 mmol/liter was associated with acidic residue and one abnormal 24-hr pH profile. There was no correlation between an abnormal 24-hr pH test and age, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, or duration of symptoms prior to treatment. Chest pain and heartburn were unrelated to drops in pH. Gastroesophageal reflux is rare in untreated achalasia and esophageal acidity may result from ingestion of acidic foods or production of lactate. Mild gastroesophageal reflux occurs after dilation but is of no clinical significance. Chest pain and heartburn are not indicators of acid reflux in achalasia.     

Variables influencing parental perception of inherited metabolic diseases before and after genetic counselling

BACKGROUND: Sixty percent of adults has typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in Chile. AIM: To report the clinical and laboratory features of patients with gastroesophageal reflux. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred thirty-four patients (255 male) with gastroesophageal reflux were included in a prospective protocol that included clinical analysis, manometry and endoscopy in all patients, barium swallow in 427, scintigraphy in 195, acid reflux test in 359, 24 h pH in 175, and differential potential of gastroesophageal mucosa in 73 patients. RESULTS: There was no correlation between the severity of symptoms and the endoscopical severity. Patients with Barret esophagus were 12 years older, were male in a greater proportion and had a higher proportion of manometrically incompetent sphincters than patients with esophageal reflux but without esophagitis or with erosive esophagitis. Severity of acid reflux, measured with 24 h pH monitoring was proportional to the endoscopical damage of the mucosa. There was a close relationship between the mucosal change limit determined with differential potentials and with endoscopy. No short esophagi were found. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux must be assessed using several objective measures to determine the severity of their pathological alterations.     

Phospholipase D activity of human amnion cells stimulated with phorbol ester and bradykinin

Twenty-four-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring is presently considered the most reliable diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux. Prolonged esophageal pH measurements can be obtained in hospitalized patients with a stationary technique and in ambulant outpatients by means of a portable device; however, there have been no studies that have examined whether the two approaches provide a similar diagnostic accuracy. We performed a prospective study to compare stationary and ambulatory pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Seventy-seven control subjects and 178 patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease were randomized to either ambulant or static pH-metry, which was performed with standard pH electrodes, sensors, and recorders. Reflux events (intraesophageal pH < 4.0) analyzed were: number of episodes; total, upright, and supine reflux time; number of episodes lasting > 5 min; and duration of the longest episode. A composite score of all reflux events according to DeMeester was also calculated. The limits of normality were defined as the 95th percentiles of the control groups. Both controls and patients assigned to either pH monitoring method were comparable. Of 255 studies attempted, 243 (95%) were completed successfully. The results showed similar median values of reflux events for the two control groups and for the two patients groups. Percent total reflux time provided a good separation between normal and abnormal reflux, with a sensitivity of 0.92 for static pH-metry and 0.68 for the ambulant procedure (respective 95th percentiles, 3.4 and 4.6).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with laryngotracheal stenosis

To report the incidence of pharyngeal acid reflux events in patients with laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS), we studied 12 patients with LTS and 34 healthy volunteers. All patients and controls underwent ambulatory 24-hour 3-site pH monitoring. In ambulatory pH monitoring, pH was recorded at manometrically determined sites of the pharynx, proximal esophagus, and distal esophagus. For all 3 sites, a pH value below 4 that was not related to the time of oral intake or belching was considered an acid reflux event. Eight of the 12 LTS patients exhibited pharyngeal acid reflux events. In the control group, pharyngeal acid reflux events were documented in 7 subjects. In between-group comparison, the number of reflux episodes and the percent acid exposure time in the pharynx were greater in LTS patients than in controls. Reflux parameters of the proximal and distal esophagus in LTS patients were similar to those of controls. The incidence of pharyngeal acid reflux events in LTS patients was higher than that in controls. It is suggested that identification and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in patients will significantly simplify and improve the results of treatment for LTS.     

Leprosy patients with lepromatous disease recognize cross-reactive T cell epitopes in the Mycobacterium leprae 10-kD antigen

BACKGROUND: Cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) may originate in extrathoracic airway receptors made hypersensitive by acid-induced mucosal injury. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the role of laryngeal disease and dysfunction in the pathogenesis of GER-associated cough in nonasthmatic patients. METHODS: Seven patients with GER-associated cough were compared with 7 patients with GER but no cough. The patients underwent fiberoptic endoscopy for assessment of laryngitis and esophagitis (expressed by scores); esophageal manometry; 24-hour pH monitoring; lung function tests; and histamine inhalation challenge with assessment of bronchial threshold (concentration provoking 10% fall in FEV1 [PC10]), extrathoracic airway threshold (concentration provoking 25% fall in the maximal midinspiratory flow [PC25MIF50]), and cough threshold (concentration provoking 5 or more coughs PCcough). The patients were reevaluated after 3 months of medical treatment for GER. RESULTS: Patients with cough, compared with those without cough, had significantly higher laryngitis scores (P = .002), lower esophageal sphincter pressures, longer time with pH below 4 (P = .003), greater number of episodes of reflux longer than 5 minutes (P = .016), longer esophageal clearance time (P = .048), and significantly lower PC25MIF50 (P = .005) and PCcough (P = .008) values. Laryngitis score was significantly inversely related to either PCcough (P < .001) or PC25MIF50 (P <.01) but not to PC10. Laryngitis score, PC25MIF50, and PCcough were all closely related to GER severity. After GER treatment, laryngitis, PC25MIF50, and PCcough were all significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that GER-associated cough is strongly associated with laryngeal disease and dysfunction consequent to acid reflux injury in nonasthmatic patients.     

Mechanisms underlying the antireflux effect of Nissen fundoplication in children

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: It is reported that the main mechanism responsible for gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation in children. However, the effect of Nissen fundoplication on transient LES relaxation has not been investigated in children. This study examined the effect of Nissen fundoplication on motor patterns of the LES in children with pathological GER. METHODS: Esophageal manometry and pH were recorded concurrently for 2 hours after administration of apple juice (10 mL/kg). In seven children documented to have pathological GER by prolonged esophageal pH monitoring (%time pH less than 4.0>5.0), studies were performed preoperatively and 1 to 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Nissen fundoplication virtually eliminated reflux in all patients. Percentage of time pH was less than 4.0 reduced from 15+/-9 to 0+/-0. Basal LES pressure did not change significantly (pre, 21+/-10 mm Hg v post, 27+/-9 mm Hg). The number of transient LES relaxation reduced significantly from 13+/-4 to 7+/-7, and the mean nadir LES pressures during swallow-induced LES relaxation and transient LES relaxation increased significantly from 1+/-1 mm Hg to 13+/-5 mm Hg and from 0+/-0 mm Hg to 11+/-7 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the antireflux effects of Nissen fundoplication may be based on changes of LES motor patterns that result in incomplete LES relaxation and reduction of the number of transient LES relaxation.     

A prospective assessment of gastroesophageal reflux before and after treatment of achalasia patients: pneumatic dilation versus transthoracic limited myotomy

OBJECTIVES: We conducted this study to determine whether reflux should be a major consideration in the choice of treatment for achalasia patients. Achalasia patients undergoing either pneumatic dilation or transthoracic limited esophagomyotomy were monitored for reflux before and after treatment, for comparison. METHODS: Twenty-four hour ambulatory esophageal pH tests and esophageal manometry were performed on 32 consecutive, untreated achalasia patients. Studied (before and after treatment) were 17 patients who underwent pneumatic dilation and 15 patients who received transthoracic limited myotomy without fundoplication. All follow-up studies were completed within 12 months of treatment. RESULTS: The ages of the two groups were not significantly different (p > 0.05, 45 +/- 9 yr myotomy vs. 44 +/- 13 yr dilation). The resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was not significantly different (p > 0.05 before treatment) between groups but was reduced significantly (p < 0.05 after treatment) in both groups (30 +/- 9 mm Hg before vs. 9 +/- 4 mm Hg after myotomy, and 27 +/- 10 mm Hg before vs. 11 +/- 4 mm Hg after pneumatic dilation. The total time the pH was < 4.0 was not significantly different, p > 0.05, in either group before treatment (myotomy, 3.7 +/- 4.4%; dilation, 2.9 +/- 4.9%) or after treatment (myotomy, 8.6 +/- 9.2%; dilation, 10.2 +/- 15.9%). Twelve of 32 patients (38%), had a percent total time < 4.0 that exceeded 6% after treatment, eight of whom were asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the amount of reflux after treatment by both pneumatic dilation and transthoracic esophagomyotomy is similar. The absence of reflux symptoms in treated achalasia patients does not exclude the possibility of significant acid reflux.     

Detection of donor-derived Langerhans cells in MHC class II immunodeficient patients after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

Barrett's esophagus can progress to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. Although the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction has increased suddenly in the United States and Europe, we do not know how much of this increase is related to Barrett's esophagus. Interest in mucosal cell abnormalities at the gastroesophageal junction has led researchers to re-examine short-segment Barrett's esophagus. In this recently described condition, specialized columnar epithelium is found in the distal 2 to 3 cm of the esophagus, yet it is not clear how it relates to conventional long-segment Barrett's esophagus, in which the metaplastic epithelium extends higher than 2 to 3 cm above the squamocolumnar junction. The reported prevalence of short-segment Barrett's esophagus found on diagnostic endoscopy varies from 8% to 32%. This wide variation would be lessened by standardized location of biopsy specimens and of endoscopic and histologic staining techniques. Based on the information available, it is apparent that the age range and sex ratios are similar. Although reflux symptoms may be more common in short-segment Barrett's esophagus, disturbances in esophageal motility are less severe and there is less reflux as measured by continuous pH monitoring. Furthermore, recognized complications of Barrett's esophagus, such as ulceration, stricture, high-grade dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma, appear to be uncommon in short-segment Barrett's esophagus.     

The effect of nasal CPAP on nocturnal reflux in patients with aperistaltic esophagus

It has been shown that nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nasal CPAP) significantly reduces nocturnal reflux both in patients with sleep apnea and in patients without sleep apnea but consistent abnormal nocturnal reflux. The mechanism by which CPAP is thought to reduce reflux includes the elevation of the resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. In this study, we tested the effect of nasal CPAP in two groups of patients with aperistaltic esophagus but with different resting LES pressure. Seven patients with scleroderma esophagus and six patients treated for achalasia were tested over a 48-h period. On the first night, the patients were untreated; on the second night, both groups received applied nasal CPAP at 8 cm H2O pressure. The percentage of time the pH < 4.0, the number of reflux events > 5 min, and the length of the longest reflux event were all significantly reduced in the patients with achalasia (p < 0.03), but not in the scleroderma group (p > 0.20). These results suggest that a residual resting LES pressure greater than that demonstrated by patients with scleroderma (> 10 mm Hg) may be necessary for nasal CPAP to affect nocturnal reflux.