非达尔文效应多目标免疫算法

为了强化非基因信息的传承与利用, 提出一种非达尔文效应多目标免疫算法(non-Darwin effect multiobjective immune algorithm, NDIA). 首先, 利用区间记忆变异矩阵来保存进化中成功变异的区间信息, 以引导后续的进化操作, 加强局部搜索能力. 其次, 算法使用Pareto排序来选择非劣解. 当非劣解的数量超出预设规模时,利用拥挤距离进行排序来选择相对稀疏的抗体保留. 最后, 算法对最后的非劣解集进行删减时设计了均匀度增强算子, 通过多次拥挤距离的排序反复删减最拥挤的抗体, 从而提高非劣解集在目标空间上的均匀性. 通过多目标测试函数的仿真试验, 与经典的多目标进化算法相比, 新算法得到的最终解集在覆盖性、收敛性和分布性均有明显的改善, 并能更好地逼近理论Pareto前沿.     

求解PMU多目标优化配置问题的非劣排序微分进化算法

为实现电网完全可观测,同时保证PMU(同步相量测量单元)的安装数日尽量少,且系统的N-1量测可靠性尽量高,笔者提出了一种混合算法,对电网中PMU进行多目标优化配置.在此算法中,通过将Pareto非劣排序操作与微分进化算法有机融合,并对个体的排挤机制和变异策略进行改进以克服进化早熟和搜索不均匀的问题,设计出了一种新的非劣排序微分进化算法对模型进行求解,并采用模糊集理论提取出最优折中解.最后以IEEE39母线系统为例进行了PMU多目标优化配置,结果表明该方法可简单快速地实现全局多目标寻优,找到更多更合理的PMU优化配置方案,能得到准确而完整的Pareto最优前沿.     

求解人力资源分配问题的多目标微粒群优化算法*

提出一种改进的多目标微粒群优化算法来求解人力资源分配问题.通过对种群进行正交初始化,保证了个体在整个可行解空间上的均匀分散,使得算法能够在整个可行解空间上进行均匀搜索;通过基于网格技术的外部存档非劣解删选策略,有效地保留了逼近Pareto前沿的非劣解;引入一种广义的学习策略来提升粒子向Pareto前沿收敛的概率.实验结...     

基于密集度的搅动多目标演化算法

多目标演化算法的研究目标是使算法种群快速收敛并均匀分布于问题的非劣最优域.定义和使用密集度来保持群体中个体的均匀分布,将个体的Pareto强度值和密集度合并到个体的适应值定义中.提出搅动策略,以提高算法对解空间的遍历性,从而较大程度上避免算法的早熟,对每次搅动得到的部分非劣解个体进行邻域搜索以加快非劣解前沿的进化.最后,测试函数的实验结果表明了算法的可行性和有效性.     

一种用于求解多目标组合优化的混合遗传算法

为高效求解多目标组合优化问题 ,提出一种进化计算与局部搜索结合的多目标算法。此算法基于个体排序数和密度值进行适应度赋值 ,采用非劣解并行局部搜索策略 ,在解的适应度赋值和局部搜索过程中使用 Pa-reto支配的概念。实验结果表明 ,新算法不仅提高了优化搜索的效率 ,且能够找到更多的近似 Pareto最优解。     

一种新的基于进化策略的多目标优化算法

用进化策略求解多目标优化问题时,为了提高解在决策变量空间中的搜索能力和保证Pareto前沿的多样性,提出了一种新的基于进化策略的多目标优化算法。运用自适应变异步长的进化策略,使解在决策变量空间中进行全局和局部搜索;并引入非劣解按一定比例进入下一代的方法,使完全被占优的个体有机会参与到下一代的繁殖,保持了解在Pareto前沿的多样性。该算法在保证解在决策空间多样性的同时,也保持了Pareto前沿的多样性。仿真实验表明,该算法具有良好的搜索性能。     

高效求解Pareto最优前沿的多目标进化算法

设计了一种新的求解均匀分布的Pareto最优解集的多目标进化算法(MOEA),其主要的特点是使用了一种新的个体适应值的计算方式,方法是通过群体中某一个体与群体的最优非劣解集的最小距离来刻画个体的适应值的.算法还结合了遗传算法中的精英策略以及NSGA-Ⅱ中的拥挤距离[12],提高了非劣解向Pareto最优前沿收敛的速度,并且保证了Pareto 最优解集的多样性.仿真结果表明,算法不仅能够获得分布良好的Pareto最优前沿,而且能够极大地简化计算,减少了算法的运行时间,其计算复杂度为o(mn2)(m表示的是目标函数的个数,n是种群的规模).     

多目标人工蜂群算法研究

人工蜂群算法是一种模仿蜜蜂采蜜行为的新兴群体智能算法.本文在人工蜂群算法的基础上采用多目标进化算法中的Pareto非劣排序和个体密度值的概念并借鉴粒子群算法,引入全局最优解记录全局最优位置,提出了一个基于Pareto占优的多目标人工蜂群算法.最后验证了算法的可行性.     

采用组合优化策略的电子侦察卫星规划方法

对电子侦察卫星任务规划问题进行了分析,建立了问题的多目标规划模型;设计了一种基于带后优化过程MOEO(Multi-objective Extremal Optimization)的多目标规划算法对模型进行求解,该算法包含MOEO主算法过程和基于禁忌搜索(TS)的后优化过程两部分:MOEO主算法中采用插入变异、模式变异及删除变异等算子对解空间进行搜索,基于Pareto最优概念的解排序确保了解在多个目标上的有效优化,精英策略避免了丢失进化过程中产生的非劣解;TS后优化过程中提出了多种邻域结构,使用各种邻域算子或算子的组合,对主算法Pareto最优解进一步优化,以得到更好的解。最后给出了仿真实例证明本文模型及算法对解决电子侦察卫星任务规划问题的有效性。     

目标0-1背包问题的元胞竞争决策算法*

为求解多目标0-1背包问题,基于竞争决策算法原理和多目标优化问题的特性,提出了一种求解多目标0-1背包问题的元胞竞争决策算法。将元胞自动机演化规则引入竞争决策算法,给出了算法的具体描述,并使用Delphi 7.0实现了算法的具体步骤。为了提高多目标非劣解(Pareto解)的分布性和多样性,利用全局经验作为指导,在最稀疏的Pareto解附近进行邻域搜索。经过大量数据测试和验证,该算法具有真实的Pareto前沿逼近效果,是一种多目标优化问题的有效方法。     

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on multimethod with dynamic resources allocation

In the last two decades, multiobjective optimization has become main stream and various multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have been suggested in the field of evolutionary computing (EC) for solving hard combinatorial and continuous multiobjective optimization problems. Most MOEAs employ single evolutionary operators such as crossover, mutation and selection for population evolution. In this paper, we suggest a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on multimethods (MMTD) with dynamic resource allocation for coping with continuous multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The suggested algorithm employs two well known population based stochastic algorithms namely MOEA/D and NSGA-II as constituent algorithms for population evolution with a dynamic resource allocation scheme. We have examined the performance of the proposed MMTD on two different MOPs test suites: the widely used ZDT problems and the recently formulated test instances for the special session on MOEAs competition of the 2009 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (CEC’09). Experimental results obtained by the suggested MMTD are more promising than those of some state-of-the-art MOEAs in terms of the inverted generational distance (IGD)-metric on most test problems.     

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for electric power dispatch problem

The potential and effectiveness of the newly developed Pareto-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA) for solving a real-world power system multiobjective nonlinear optimization problem are comprehensively discussed and evaluated in this paper. Specifically, nondominated sorting genetic algorithm, niched Pareto genetic algorithm, and strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA) have been developed and successfully applied to an environmental/economic electric power dispatch problem. A new procedure for quality measure is proposed in this paper in order to evaluate different techniques. A feasibility check procedure has been developed and superimposed on MOEA to restrict the search to the feasible region of the problem space. A hierarchical clustering algorithm is also imposed to provide the power system operator with a representative and manageable Pareto-optimal set. Moreover, an approach based on fuzzy set theory is developed to extract one of the Pareto-optimal solutions as the best compromise one. These multiobjective evolutionary algorithms have been individually examined and applied to the standard IEEE 30-bus six-generator test system. Several optimization runs have been carried out on different cases of problem complexity. The results of MOEA have been compared to those reported in the literature. The results confirm the potential and effectiveness of MOEA compared to the traditional multiobjective optimization techniques. In addition, the results demonstrate the superiority of the SPEA as a promising multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to solve different power system multiobjective optimization problems.     

基于目标空间划分的自适应多目标进化算法

目前,多目标进化算法在众多领域具有极高的应用价值,是优化领域的研究热点之一.分析已有多目标进化算法在保持种群多样性方面的不足并提出一种基于解空间划分的自适应多目标进化算法（space division basedadaptive multiobjective evolutionary algorithm,简称SDA-MOEA）来解决多目标优化问题.该方法首先将多目标优化问题的解空间划分为大量子空间,在算法进化过程中,每个子空间都保留一个非支配解集,以保证种群的多样性.另外,该方法根据每个子空间推进种群前进的距离,自适应地为每个子空间分配进化机会,以提高种群的进化速度.最后,利用3组共14个多目标优化问题检验SDA-MOEA的性能,并将SDA-MOEA与其他5个已有多目标进化算法进行对比分析.实验结果表明：在10个问题上,算法SDA-MOEA显著优于其他对比算法.     

Solution of multiobjective optimization problems: coevolutionary algorithm based on evolutionary game theory

When attempting to solve multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) using evolutionary algorithms, the Pareto genetic algorithm (GA) has now become a standard of sorts. After its introduction, this approach was further developed and led to many applications. All of these approaches are based on Pareto ranking and use the fitness sharing function to keep diversity. On the other hand, the scheme for solving MOPs presented by Nash introduced the notion of Nash equilibrium and aimed at solving MOPs that originated from evolutionary game theory and economics. Since the concept of Nash Equilibrium was introduced, game theorists have attempted to formalize aspects of the evolutionary equilibrium. Nash genetic algorithm (Nash GA) is the idea to bring together genetic algorithms and Nash strategy. The aim of this algorithm is to find the Nash equilibrium through the genetic process. Another central achievement of evolutionary game theory is the introduction of a method by which agents can play optimal strategies in the absence of rationality. Through the process of Darwinian selection, a population of agents can evolve to an evolutionary stable strategy (ESS). In this article, we find the ESS as a solution of MOPs using a coevolutionary algorithm based on evolutionary game theory. By applying newly designed coevolutionary algorithms to several MOPs, we can confirm that evolutionary game theory can be embodied by the coevolutionary algorithm and this coevolutionary algorithm can find optimal equilibrium points as solutions for an MOP. We also show the optimization performance of the co-evolutionary algorithm based on evolutionary game theory by applying this model to several MOPs and comparing the solutions with those of previous evolutionary optimization models. This work was presented, in part, at the 8th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics, Oita, Japan, January 24#x2013;26, 2003.     

Multiobjective optimization using population-based extremal optimization

In recent years, a general-purpose local-search heuristic method called Extremal Optimization (EO) has been successfully applied in some NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. In this paper, we present a novel Pareto-based algorithm, which can be regarded as an extension of EO, to solve multiobjective optimization problems. The proposed method, called Multiobjective Population-based Extremal Optimization (MOPEO), is validated by using five benchmark functions and metrics taken from the standard literature on multiobjective evolutionary optimization. The experimental results demonstrate that MOPEO is competitive with the state-of-the-art multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Thus MOPEO can be considered as a viable alternative to solve multiobjective optimization problems.     

The effects of asymmetric neighborhood assignment in the MOEA/D algorithm

The Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition (MOEA/D) is a very efficient multiobjective evolutionary algorithm introduced in recent years. This algorithm works by decomposing a multiobjective optimization problem to many scalar optimization problems and by assigning each specimen in the population to a specific subproblem. The MOEA/D algorithm transfers information between specimens assigned to the subproblems using a neighborhood relation.In this paper it is shown that parameter settings commonly used in the literature cause an asymmetric neighbor assignment which in turn affects the selective pressure and consequently causes the population to converge asymmetrically. The paper contains theoretical explanation of how this bias is caused as well as an experimental verification. The described effect is undesirable, because a multiobjective optimizer should not introduce asymmetries not present in the optimization problem. The paper gives some guidelines on how to avoid such artificial asymmetries.     

A novel micro-population immune multiobjective optimization algorithm

In this paper, we present a novel immune multiobjective optimization algorithm based on micro-population, which adopts a novel adaptive mutation operator for local search and an efficient fine-grained selection operator for archive update. With the external archive for storing nondominated individuals, the population diversity can be well preserved using an efficient fine-grained selection procedure performed on the micro-population. The adaptive mutation operator is executed according to the fitness values, which promotes to use relatively large steps for boundary and less-crowded individuals in high probability. Therefore, the exploratory capabilities are enhanced. When comparing the proposed algorithm with a recently proposed immune multiobjective algorithm and a scatter search multiobjective algorithm in various benchmark functions, simulations show that the proposed algorithm not only improves convergence ability but also preserves population diversity adequately in most cases.     

一种基于混合高斯模型的多目标进化算法

目前,大多数多目标进化算法采用为单目标优化所设计的重组算子.通过证明或实验分析了几个典型的单目标优化重组算子并不适合某些多目标优化问题.提出了基于分解技术和混合高斯模型的多目标优化算法（multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition and mixture Gaussian models,简称MOEA/D-MG）.该算法首先采用一个改进的混合高斯模型对群体建模并采样产生新个体,然后利用一个贪婪策略来更新群体.针对具有复杂Pareto前沿的多目标优化问题的测试结果表明,对给定的大多数测试题,该算法具有良好的效果.     

多目标协调进化算法研究

进化算法适合解决多目标优化问题,但难以产生高维优化问题的最优解,文中针对此问题提出了一种求解高维目标优化问题的新进化方法,即多目标协调进化算法,主要特点是进化群体按协调模型使用偏好信息进行偏好排序,而不是基于Pareto优于关系进行了个体排序,实验结果表明,所提出的算法是可行而有效的,且能在有限进化代数内收敛。     

MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition

Decomposition is a basic strategy in traditional multiobjective optimization. However, it has not yet been widely used in multiobjective evolutionary optimization. This paper proposes a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D). It decomposes a multiobjective optimization problem into a number of scalar optimization subproblems and optimizes them simultaneously. Each subproblem is optimized by only using information from its several neighboring subproblems, which makes MOEA/D have lower computational complexity at each generation than MOGLS and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). Experimental results have demonstrated that MOEA/D with simple decomposition methods outperforms or performs similarly to MOGLS and NSGA-II on multiobjective 0-1 knapsack problems and continuous multiobjective optimization problems. It has been shown that MOEA/D using objective normalization can deal with disparately-scaled objectives, and MOEA/D with an advanced decomposition method can generate a set of very evenly distributed solutions for 3-objective test instances. The ability of MOEA/D with small population, the scalability and sensitivity of MOEA/D have also been experimentally investigated in this paper.