Transthoracic defibrillation of swine with monophasic and biphasic waveforms

BACKGROUND: Biphasic waveforms have had a favorable impact on internal defibrillation but have seen minimal use in transthoracic defibrillation systems. The purpose of this study was to compare monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in swine. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three interrelated studies were performed in 19 swine to establish the relative transthoracic defibrillation efficacy of biphasic shock waveforms. In study 1, we measured voltage (V50) and energy (E50) strength-duration curves for monophasic and biphasic truncated exponential waveforms. We then independently examined the effects of phase duration and tilt on biphasic waveform defibrillation with a total waveform duration from study 1 that provided the minimum V50 (study 2) and the minimum E50 (study 3). At each pulse duration tested in study 1, biphasic waveforms defibrillated with significantly less voltage and energy than monophasic waveforms. At a duration of 12 ms, there was a voltage minimum for biphasic waveform defibrillation. At this duration, V50 was 1378 +/- 505 V for the biphasic waveform compared with 2185 +/- 361 V for the monophasic waveform, P = .01. For both monophasic and biphasic waveforms, E50 increased with pulse duration. With a total pulse duration of 12 ms, E50 was 169 +/- 101 J for the biphasic waveform compared with 414 +/- 114 J for the monophasic waveform, P = .003. In study 2, optimization of phase duration and total tilt reduced the defibrillation requirements of the 12-ms "minimum voltage" biphasic waveform to 1284 +/- 187 V and 129 +/- 36 J. In study 3, the 8-ms "minimum energy" biphasic waveform had an E50 of 115 +/- 35 J that was 11% less than the 12-ms biphasic waveform, P = .11; however, voltage requirements of 1476 +/- 239 V were 15% higher, P = .005. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the superiority of truncated biphasic waveforms over truncated monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation of swine. Biphasic waveforms should prove as advantageous at reducing voltage and energy requirements for transthoracic defibrillation as they have for internal defibrillation.     

Encircling overlapping multipulse shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to determine the efficacy of new encircling overlapping multipulse, multipathway waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation. BACKGROUND: Alternative waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation may improve shock success. METHODS: First, we determined the shock success achieved by three different waveforms at varying energies (18-150 J) in 21 mongrel dogs after short-duration ventricular fibrillation. The waveforms tested included the traditional damped sinusoidal waveform, a single pathway biphasic waveform, and a new encircling overlapping multipulse waveform delivered from six electrode pads oriented circumferentially. Second, in 11 swine we compared the efficacy of encircling overlapping multipulse shocks given from six electrode pads and three capacitors versus encircling overlapping shocks given from a device utilizing three electrodes and one capacitor. RESULTS: In the first experiment, the encircling overlapping waveform performed significantly better than biphasic and damped sinusoidal waveforms at lower energies. The shock success rate of the overlapping waveform (six pads) ranged from 67+/-4% (at 18-49 J energy) to 99+/-3% at > or = 150 J; at comparable energies biphasic waveform shock success ranged from 26+/-5% (p < 0.01 vs. encircling overlapping waveforms) to 99+/-5% (p = NS). Damped sinusoidal waveform shock success ranged from 4+/-1% (p < 0.01 vs. encircling overlapping waveform) to 73+/-9% (p = NS). In the second experiment the three electrode pads, one capacitor encircling waveform achieved shock success rates comparable with the six-pad, three-capacitor waveform; at 18-49 J, success rates were 45+/-15% versus 57+/-12%, respectively (p = NS). At 100 J, success rates for both were 100%. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that encircling overlapping multipulse multipathway waveforms facilitate transthoracic defibrillation at low energies. These waveforms can be generated from a device that requires only three electrodes and one capacitor.     

Preferential selection of specific rotavirus gene segments in coinfection and multiple passages with reassortant viruses and their parental strain

INTRODUCTION: The size of current implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) is still large in comparison to pacemakers and thus not convenient for pectoral implantation. One way to reduce ICD size is to defibrillate with smaller capacitors. A trade-off exists, however, since smaller capacitors may generate a lower maximum energy output. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective randomized cross-over study, the step-down defibrillation threshold (DFT) of an experimental 90-microF biphasic waveform was compared to a standard 125-microF biphasic waveform. The 90-microF capacitor delivered the same energy faster and with a higher peak voltage but provided only a maximum energy output of 20 instead of 34 J. DFTs were determined intraoperatively in 30 patients randomized to receive either an endocardial (n = 15) or an endocardial-subcutaneous array (n = 15) defibrillation lead system. Independent of the lead system used, energy requirements did not differ at DFT for the experimental and the standard waveforms (10.3 +/- 4.1 and 9.5 +/- 4.9 J, respectively), but peak voltages were higher for the experimental waveform than for the standard waveform (411 +/- 80 and 325 +/- 81 V, respectively). For the experimental waveform the DFT w as 10 J or less using an endocardial lead-alone system in 10 (67%) of 15 patients and in 12 (80%) of 15 patients using an endocardial-subcutaneous array lead system. CONCLUSIONS: A shorter duration waveform delivered by smaller capacitors does not increase defibrillation energy requirements and might reduce device size. However, the smaller capacitance reduces the maximum energy output. If a 10-J safety margin between DFT and maximum energy output of the ICD is required, only a subgroup of patients will benefit from 90-microF ICDs with DFTs feasible using current defibrillation lead systems.     

Early out-of-hospital experience with an impedance-compensating low-energy biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator

Impedance-compensating low-energy biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveforms are effective in transthoracic defibrillation of short-duration ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, the BTE waveform has not been examined in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with patients in prolonged VF often associated with myocardial ischemia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the BTE waveform automatic external defibrillator (AED) in the out-of-hospital setting with long-duration VF. AEDs incorporating a 150-J BTE waveform were placed in 12 police squad cars and 4 paramedic-staffed advanced life support ambulances. AEDs were applied to arrested patients by first-arriving personnel, whether police or paramedics. Data were obtained from PC Data Cards within the AED. Defibrillation was defined as at least transient termination of VF. Ten patients, 64 +/- 14 years, were treated for VF with BTE shocks. Another 8 patients were in nonshockable rhythms and the AEDs, appropriately, did not advise a shock. Five of the 10 VF arrests were witnessed with a 911 call-to-shock time of 6.6 +/- 1.7 minutes. VF detection and defibrillation occurred in all 10 patients. Spontaneous circulation was restored in 3 of 5 witnessed arrest patients and 1 survived to discharge home. Fifty-one VF episodes were converted with 62 shocks. Presenting VF amplitude and rate were 0.43 +/- 0.22 (0.13-0.86) mV and 232 +/- 62 (122-353) beats/min, respectively, and defibrillation was achieved with the first shock in 7 of 10 patients. Including transient conversions, defibrillation occurred in 42 of 51 VF episodes (82%) with one BTE shock. Shock impedance was 85 +/- 10 (39-138) ohms. Delivered energy and peak voltage were 152 +/- 2 J and 1754 +/- 4 V, respectively. The average number of shocks per VF episode was 1.2 +/- 0.5 (1-3). More than one shock was needed in only 9 episodes; none required > 3 shocks to defibrillate. Impedance-compensating low-energy BTE waveforms terminated VF in OHCA patients with a conversion rate exceeding that of higher energy monophasic waveforms. VF was terminated in all patients, including those with high impedance.     

Relative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation after short and long durations of ventricular fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Recently, interest has arisen in using biphasic waveforms for external defibrillation. Little work has been done, however, in measuring transthoracic defibrillation efficacy after long periods of ventricular fibrillation. In protocol 1, we compared the efficacy of a quasi-sinusoidal biphasic waveform (QSBW), a truncated exponential biphasic waveform (TEBW), and a critically damped sinusoidal monophasic waveform (CDSMW) after 15 seconds of fibrillation. In protocol 2, we compared the efficacy of the more efficacious biphasic waveform from protocol 1, QSBW, with CDSMW after 15 seconds and 5 minutes of fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In protocol 1, 50% success levels, ED50, were measured after 15 seconds of fibrillation for the 3 waveforms in 6 dogs. In protocol 2, defibrillation thresholds were measured for QSBW and CDSMW after 15 seconds of fibrillation and after 3 minutes of unsupported fibrillation followed by 2 minutes of fibrillation with femoral-femoral cross-circulation. In protocol 1, QSBW had a lower ED50, 16.0+/-4.9 J, than TEBW, 20.3+/-4.4 J, or CDSMW, 27.4+/-6.0 J. In protocol 2, QSBW had a lower defibrillation threshold after 15 seconds, 38+/-10 J, and after 5 minutes, 41.5+/-5 J, than CDSMW after 15 seconds, 54+/-19 J, and 5 minutes, 80+/-30 J, of fibrillation. The defibrillation threshold remained statistically the same for QSBW for the 2 fibrillation durations but rose significantly for CDSMW. CONCLUSIONS: In this animal model of sudden death and resuscitation, these 2 biphasic waveforms are more efficacious than the CDSMW at short durations of fibrillation. Furthermore, the QSBW is even more efficacious than the CDSMW at longer durations of fibrillation.     

Effect of the addition of an abdominal hot can cardioverter/defibrillator pulse generator on the defibrillation energy requirements in a single-lead endocardial defibrillation system

AIMS: The effects of a cardioverter/defibrillator system with an electrically active generator can, applied without recourse to thoracotomy, have not been investigated in the abdominal position in humans. The purpose of this acute clinical study was to evaluate the defibrillation efficacy of an abdominally positioned hot can electrode in connection with a single lead endocardial defibrillation system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients undergoing implantation of a cardioverter/defibrillator or pulse generator replacement were enrolled in this study Each patient received an integrated, tripolar single-lead system. This was tested using an asymmetrical biphasic defibrillation waveform with constant energy delivery. Defibrillation energy, peak voltage, peak current and impedance were compared between two electrode configurations: (A) in this configuration the distal right ventricular coil was negative and the proximal coil positive; (B) in this configuration the distal right ventricular coil was negative and the proximal coil and the abdominal hot can (65 ccm), as common anode, were positive. Defibrillation threshold testing started at 15 J with stepwise energy reduction (10 J, 8 J, 5 J and 3 J) until defibrillation was ineffective. RESULTS: Compared to the single-lead configuration, the abdominal hot can configuration revealed at 17.5% reduction in defibrillation energy requirements (8.6 J +/- 4.3 J vs 10.43 J +/- 3.9 J; P = 0.041), a 15.7% reduction in peak voltage (308.6 V +/- 63 V vs 365.3 V +/- 68 V; P = 0.003), and a 21.6% reduction in impedance (41.1 omega +/- 6.3 omega vs 52.4 omega +/- 6.6 omega; P < 0.001). Peak current showed a significant increase during hot can testing of 8.2% (7.2 A +/- 1.8 A vs 7.8 A +/- 2.2 A; P = 0.16). CONCLUSION: An abdominally placed hot can pulse generator lowered defibrillation energy requirements in patients with an endocardial defibrillation lead system.     

Effects of initial polarity on defibrillation threshold with biphasic pulses

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the polarity of epicardial patches significantly affects the defibrillation efficacy of monophasic shocks. However, whether this improvement can be extended to different pulsing methods and lead systems, such as biphasic shocks using endocardial defibrillating electrodes, is unknown. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients undergoing testing and permanent implant using an Endotak lead system with a biphasic device were included in the study. In each patient the defibrillation threshold was determined delivering biphasic pulses with the distal coil as the cathode and the proximal coil as the anode during the positive phase and with the polarity reversed. The initial electrode polarity tested was chosen randomly. The defibrillation threshold was defined as the lowest pulse amplitude that effectively terminated ventricular fibrillation induced with 60-Hz alternating current. For each biphasic pulse peak voltage, pulse duration, resistance, and stored energy were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 12 (60%) had lower defibrillation threshold when the proximal coil was negative, whereas only 2 patients had a lower defibrillation threshold when the distal coil was negative. In four patients a subcutaneous patch would have been required if only the biphasic pulse with the distal coil as negative had been tested. The mean stored defibrillation threshold energy was lower with the configuration using the proximal coil as cathode (16.3 +/- 8.8 J vs 21.5 +/- 11 J; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Change in the initial polarity of biphasic shocks may influence defibrillation efficacy and should, therefore, be assessed in each patient to achieve a more satisfactory safety margin and minimize the use of more invasive lead configurations.     

Clinical shock tolerability and effect of different right atrial electrode locations on efficacy of low energy human transvenous atrial defibrillation using an implantable lead system

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were 1) to evaluate the effect of different right atrial electrode locations on the efficacy of low energy transvenous defibrillation with an implantable lead system; and 2) to qualitate and quantify the discomfort from atrial defibrillation shocks delivered by a clinically relevant method. BACKGROUND: Biatrial shocks result in the lowest thresholds for transvenous atrial defibrillation, but the optimal right atrial and coronary sinus electrode locations for defibrillation efficacy in humans have not been defined. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (17 men, 11 women) with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) (lasting > or = 1 month) were studied. Transvenous atrial defibrillation was performed by delivering R wave-synchronized biphasic shocks with incremental shock levels (from 180 to 400 V in steps of 40 V). Different electrode location combinations were used and tested randomly: the anterolateral, inferomedial right atrium or high right atrial appendage to the distal coronary sinus. Defibrillation thresholds were defined in duplicate by using the step-up protocol. Pain perception of shock delivery was assessed by using a purpose-designed questionnaire; sedation was given when the shock level was unacceptable (tolerability threshold). RESULTS: Sinus rhythm was restored in 26 of 28 patients by using at least one of the right atrial electrode locations tested. The conversion rate with the anterolateral right atrial location (21 [81%] of 26) was higher than that with the inferomedial right atrial location (8 [50%] of 16, p < 0.05) but similar to that with the high right atrial appendage location (16 [89%] of 18, p > 0.05). The mean defibrillation thresholds for the high right atrial appendage, anterolateral right atrium and inferomedial right atrium were all significantly different with respect to energy (3.9 +/- 1.8 J vs. 4.6 +/- 1.8 J vs. 6.0 +/- 1.7 J, respectively, p < 0.05) and voltage (317 +/- 77 V vs. 348 +/- 70 V vs. 396 +/- 66 V, respectively, p < 0.05). Patients tolerated a mean of 3.4 +/- 2 shocks with a tolerability threshold of 255 +/- 60 V, 2.5 +/- 1.3 J. CONCLUSIONS: Low energy transvenous defibrillation with an implantable defibrillation lead system is an effective treatment for AF. Most patients can tolerate two to three shocks, and, when the starting shock level (180 V) is close to the defibrillation threshold, they can tolerate on average a shock level of 260 V without sedation. Electrodes should be positioned in the distal coronary sinus and in the high right atrial appendage to achieve the lowest defibrillation threshold, although other locations may be suitable for certain patients.     

Proinsulin: recent observations and controversies

INTRODUCTION: Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) usually are determined with the patient in the supine position. However, patients may be in the upright position when a shock is delivered during follow-up, which may explain some first shock failures observed clinically. This study investigated whether body posture affects defibrillation energy requirements of nonthoracotomy implantable cardioverter defibrillators with biphasic shocks. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a step up-down protocol, DFTs were compared intraindividually in 52 patients ("active-can" sytems in 41 patients, two-lead systems in 11 patients) for the supine and upright positions as achieved by a tilt table. The mean DFT was 7.3 +/- 4.2 J in the supine versus 9.2 +/- 4.8 J in the upright position (P = 0.002). Repeated comparison in reversed order 3 months after implantation in 22 patients revealed thresholds of 6.2 +/- 2.5 J (supine) versus 8.4 +/- 3.7 J (upright; P < 0.03) 1 week and 4.4 +/- 2.4 J (supine) versus 6.2 +/- 4.1 J (upright; P < 0.04) 3 months after implantation. DFTs decreased significantly for both body positions from 1 week to 3 months after implantation (P < 0.04). CONCLUSION: (1) DFTs for biphasic shocks delivered by nonthoracotomy defibrillators are higher in the upright compared to the supine body position. (2) Differences remain significant 3 months after implantation. For both body positions, DFT decreases significantly from 1 week to 3 months after implantation. These findings have important implications for programming first shock energy to lower than maximal values or for development of devices with lower maximal stored energy.     

Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: marked reduction in defibrillation threshold with dual current pathways

BACKGROUND: The ultimate acceptance of a fully automatic atrial defibrillator will depend on the reduction of pain to acceptable levels, requiring a marked decrease in defibrillation thresholds. The purpose of this study was to determine whether atrial defibrillation thresholds can be reduced by sequential shocks delivered through two current pathways. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sustained atrial fibrillation was induced with rapid atrial pacing in 12 adult sheep. Defibrillation electrodes were positioned in the right atrial appendage (RAap), distal coronary sinus (DCS), proximal coronary sinus (CSos), main/left pulmonary artery junction (PA), and right ventricular apex (RV). Single-capacitor biphasic waveforms (3/1 ms) were delivered through combinations of these electrodes. Probability-of-success curves were determined for single shocks with a single current pathway and sequential shocks with either single- or dual current pathways. The ED50 for delivered energy for the dual current pathway RAap to DCS then CSos to PA was 0.36+/-0.13 J, which was significantly lower than the ED50 of the standard single current pathway RAap to DCS (1.31+/-0.3 J) and was significantly lower than all other configurations tested. CONCLUSIONS: Internal atrial defibrillation thresholds can be markedly reduced with two sequential biphasic shocks delivered over two current pathways compared with the standard single shock delivered over a single current pathway or with sequential shocks delivered over a single current pathway.     

Long-term evaluation of the ventricular defibrillation energy requirement

INTRODUCTION: Defibrillation energy requirements in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillators may increase within several months after implantation. However, the stability of the defibrillation energy requirement beyond 1 year has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to characterize the defibrillation energy requirement during 2 years of clinical follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with a biphasic nonthoracotomy defibrillation system underwent defibrillation energy requirement testing using a step-down technique (20, 15, 12, 10, 8, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 J) during defibrillator implantation, and then 24 hours, 2 months, 1 year, and 2 years after implantation. The mean defibrillation energy requirement during these evaluations was 10.9+/-5.5 J, 12.3+/-7.3 J, 11.7+/-5.6 J, 10.2+/-4.0 J, and 11.7+/-7.4 J, respectively (P = 0.4). The defibrillation energy requirement was noted to have increased by 10 J or more after 2 years of follow-up in five patients. In one of these patients, the defibrillation energy requirement was no longer associated with an adequate safety margin, necessitating revision of the defibrillation system. There were no identifiable clinical characteristics that distinguished patients who did and did not develop a 10-J or more increase in the defibrillation energy requirement. CONCLUSION: The mean defibrillation energy requirement does not change significantly after 2 years of biphasic nonthoracotomy defibrillator system implantation. However, approximately 15% of patients develop a 10-J or greater elevation in the defibrillation energy requirement, and 3% may require a defibrillation system revision. Therefore, a yearly evaluation of the defibrillation energy requirement may be appropriate.     

Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems

The feasibility of achieving both universal application of nonthoracotomy leads and low (< or = 15 J) defibrillation energy requirements by optimizing lead system configuration for use with low-output (<30 J) biphasic shock pulse generators was examined. Sixteen patients (mean age 62 +/- 8 years and mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 38 +/- 15%) were included in the study. All patients had either experienced syncope with induced ventricular tachycardia (n = 4) or had documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 7) or ventricular fibrillation (n = 5). Defibrillation threshold testing was performed in 2 stages on different days in these patients. In the first stage, 2 defibrillation catheter electrodes were positioned in the right ventricle and superior vena cava with an axillary cutaneous patch. Fifteen-joule, 10- and 5-J biphasic shocks were delivered across 3 different electrode configurations-right ventricle to superior vena cava, right ventricle to axillary patch, right ventricle to a combination of superior vena cava and axillary patch. In the second stage, an 80-ml can electrode was added subcutaneously in a pectoral location to the previous leads. Configurations compared were the right ventricle to pectoral can, and right ventricle to an "array"-combining superior vena cava, can, and axillary patch leads. The defibrillation threshold was determined using a step-down method. In stage 1, mean defibrillation threshold for the right ventricle to axillary patch (12.7 +/- 5.9 J) and right ventricle to superior vena cava plus axillary patch (9.8 +/- 5.2 J) configurations was lower than the right ventricle to superior vena cava configuration (14.2 +/- 6.4 J, p <0.05). In stage 2, the defibrillation was higher for the right ventricle to pectoral can (9.2 +/- 5.1 J) configuration compared with the right ventricle to the array (5.6 +/- 3.6 J, p < or =0.05). The right ventricle to array had the lowest defibrillation threshold, whereas the right ventricle to pectoral can was the best dual electrode system. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation (< or =10 J) was feasible in 72% of tested patients with > 1 electrode configuration at 10 J, whereas only 53% of successful patients could be reverted at >1 electrode configuration at 5 J (p <0.05). Reduction in maximum pulse generator output to < or =25 J using these electrode configurations with bidirectional shocks is feasible and maintains an adequate safety margin.     

Anti-verotoxin-neutralizing antibody in intravenous gammaglobulin preparations

BACKGROUND: A previous retrospective study by our group suggested that shocks timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram improved defibrillation efficacy. The goal of this study was to prospectively determine whether defibrillation threshold could be reduced by use of an algorithm that timed shocks to the upslope of coarse ventricular fibrillation (test treatment) compared with shocks delivered asynchronously after 10 seconds of fibrillation (control treatment). METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten pigs were instrumented with a 3-lead system for internal defibrillation. Initial estimates of the energy required to achieve defibrillation E50 for both treatments were made by an up/down method. Subsequently, additional shocks at V50+/-10% and V50-20% were given for each treatment to obtain data points at higher and lower intensities. Probability-of-success curves were estimated for both treatments by the best-fit method. Energies required were significantly lower for the timed shocks than for the asynchronous shocks (P<0.00 1). E80 was reduced 15.5%, from 27.1+/-2.5 to 22.9+/-1.8 J (P<0.002). The width of the probability-of-success curve (E80-E20) for the test treatment was also significantly narrower than that for the control treatment (7.1+/-0.9 versus 10.8+/-1.7, P<0.01). Normalized curve width (E80-E20)/E50 was decreased from 51+/-5% of E50 for control shocks to 37+/-4% of E50 for synchronous shocks (P<0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In this model, defibrillation threshold is lower and more deterministic when shocks are timed to the upslope of the shocking lead electrogram. If a similar reduction is observed in humans, shock timing may lower defibrillation threshold and simplify programming of shock intensity.     

Monetary compensation for plasma donors: a record of safety

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia after open heart surgery. Traditional treatment with a range of antiarrhythmic drugs and electrical cardioversion is associated with considerable side effects. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and efficacy of low-energy atrial defibrillation with temporary epicardial defibrillation wire electrodes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Epicardial defibrillation wire electrodes were placed at the left and right atria during open heart surgery in 100 consecutive patients (age 65+/-9 years; male to female ratio 67:23). Electrophysiological studies performed postoperatively revealed a test shock (0.3 J) impedance of 96+/-12 omega (monophasic) and 97+/-13 omega (biphasic). During their hospital stay, AF occurred in 23 patients (23%) at 2.1+/-1.3 days postoperatively. Internal atrial defibrillation was performed in 20 patients. Of these patients, 80% (16/20) were successfully cardioverted with a mean energy of 5.2+/-3 J. Early recurrence of AF (< or =60 seconds after defibrillation) developed in 8 patients. Five patients had multiple episodes of AF. In total, 35 episodes of AF were treated, with an 88% success rate. Only 6 patients (30%) required sedation. No complications were observed with shock application or with lead extraction. CONCLUSIONS: Atrial defibrillation with temporary epicardial wire electrodes can be performed safely and effectively in patients after cardiac operations. The shock energy required to restore sinus rhythm is low. Thus, patients can be cardioverted without anesthesia.     

Effect of a single element subcutaneous array electrode added to a transvenous electrode configuration on the defibrillation field and the defibrillation threshold

Even with the use of biphasic shocks, up to 5% of patients need an additional subcutaneous lead to obtain a defibrillation safety margin of at least 10 J. The number of patients requiring additional subcutaneous leads may even increase, because recent generation devices have a < 34 J maximum output in order to decrease their size. In 20 consecutive patients, a single element subcutaneous array lead was implanted in addition to a transvenous lead system consisting of a right ventricular (RV) and a vena cava superior lead using a single infraclavicular incision. The RV lead acted as the cathode; the subcutaneous lead and the lead in the subclavian vein acted as the anode. The biphasic defibrillation threshold was determined using a binary search protocol. Patients were randomized as to whether to start them with the transvenous lead configuration or the combination of the transvenous lead and the subcutaneous lead. In addition, a simplified assessment of the defibrillation field was performed by determining the interelectrode area for the transvenous lead only and the transvenous lead in combination with the subcutaneous lead from a biplane chest X ray. The intraoperative defibrillation threshold was reconfirmed after 1 week, after 3 months, and after 12 months. The mean defibrillation threshold with the additional subcutaneous lead was significantly (P = 0.0001) lower (5.7 +/- 2.9 J) than for the transvenous lead system (9.5 +/- 4.6 J). With the subcutaneous lead, the impedance of the high voltage circuit decreased from 48.9 +/- 7.4 omega to 39.2 +/- 5.0 omega. In the frontal plane, the interelectrode area increased by 11.3% +/- 5.5% (P < 0.0001) and in the lateral plane by 29.5% +/- 12.4% (P < 0.0001). The defibrillation threshold did not increase during follow-up. Complications with the subcutaneous electrode were not observed during a follow-up of 15.8 +/- 2 months. The single finger array lead is useful in order to lower the defibrillation threshold and can be used in order to lower the defibrillation threshold.     

Influence of polarity reversal on defibrillation success with biphasic shocks and a transvenous/subcutaneous defibrillator system in a porcine animal model

Clinical studies show that polarity reversal affects defibrillation success in transvenous monophasic defibrillators. Current devices use biphasic shocks for defibrillation. We investigated in a porcine animal model whether polarity reversal influences defibrillation success with biphasic shocks. In nine anesthetized, ventilated pigs, the defibrillation efficacy of biphasic shocks (14.3 ms and 10.8 ms pulse duration) with "initial polarity" (IP, distal electrode = cathode) and "reversed polarity" (RP, distal electrode = anode) delivered via a transvenous/subcutaneous lead system was compared. Voltage and current of each defibrillating pulse were recorded on an oscilloscope and impedance calculated as voltage divided by current. Cumulative defibrillation success was significantly higher for RP than for IP for both pulse durations (55% vs 44%, P = 0.019) for 14.3 ms (57% vs 45%, P < 0.05) and insignificantly higher for 10.8 ms (52% vs 42%, P = ns). Impedance was significantly lower with RP at the trailing edge of pulse 1 (IP: 44 +/- 8.4 vs RP: 37 +/- 9.3 with 14.3 ms, P < 0.001 and IP: 44 +/- 6.2 vs RP: 41 +/- 7.6 omega with 10.8 ms, P < 0.001) and the leading edge of pulse 2 (IP: 37 +/- 5 vs RP: 35 +/- 4.2 omega with 14.3 ms, P = 0.05 and IP: 37.5 +/- 3.7 vs RP: 36 +/- 5 omega with 10.8 ms, P = 0.02). In conclusion, in this animal model, internal defibrillation using the distal coil as anode results in higher defibrillation efficacy than using the distal coil as cathode. Calculated impedances show different courses throughout the shock pulses suggesting differences in current flow during the shock.     

Effects of left atrial dilatation on the endocardial atrial defibrillation threshold: a study in an ovine model of pacing induced dilated cardiomyopathy

Left atrial (LA) dilation is a common finding in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF). Progressive dilatation may alter the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT). In our study, epicardial electrodes were implanted on the LA free wall and right ventricular apex of eight adult sheep. Large surface area, coiled endocardial electrodes were positioned in the coronary sinus and right atrium (RA). LA dilatation was induced by rapid ventricular pacing (190 beats/min) for 6 weeks and echocardiographically assessed weekly along with the ADFT (under propofol anesthesia). LA effective refractory period (ERP) was measured every 2-3 days using a standard extra stimulus technique and 400 ms drive. The AF cycle length (AFCL) was assessed from LA electrograms. During the 6 weeks of pacing the mean LA area increased from 6.1 +/- 1.5 to 21.3 +/- 2.4 cm2. There were no significant changes in the mean ADFT (122 +/- 15 V), circuit impedance (46 +/- 5 omega), or LA AFCL (136 +/- 23 ms). There was a significant increase in the mean LA ERP (106 +/- 10 ms at day 0, and 120 +/- 13 ms at day 42 of pacing). In this study, using chronically implanted defibrillation leads, the minimal energy requirements for successful AF were not significantly altered by ongoing left atrial dilatation. This finding is a further endorsement of the efficiency of the coronary sinus/RA shock vector. Furthermore, the apparent stability of the AF present may be a further indication of a link between the type of AF and the ADFT.     

The effect of HER-2/neu overexpression on chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity in human breast and ovarian cancer cells

INTRODUCTION: Determination of the optimal electrode configuration during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation remains largely an empirical process. This study investigated the feasibility of using a finite element model of the thorax to predict clinical defibrillation metrics for internal defibrillation in humans. Computed defibrillation metrics from simulations of three common electrode configurations with a monophasic waveform were compared to pooled metrics for similar electrode and waveform configurations reported in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: A three-dimensional finite element model was constructed from CT cross-sections of a human thorax. Myocardial current density distributions for three electrode configurations (epicardial patches, right ventricular [RV] coil/superior vena cava [SVC] coil, RV coil/SVC coil/subcutaneous patch) and a truncated monophasic pulse with a 65% tilt were simulated. Assuming an inexcitability threshold of 25 mA/cm2 (10 V/cm) and a 75% critical mass criterion for successful defibrillation, defibrillation metrics (interelectrode impedance, defibrillation threshold current, voltage, and energy) were calculated for each electrode simulation. Values of these metrics were within 1 SD of sample-size weighted means for the corresponding metrics determined for similar electrode configurations and waveforms reported in human clinical studies. Simulated myocardial current density distributions suggest that variations in current distribution and uniformity partially explain differences in defibrillation energy requirements between electrode configurations. CONCLUSION: Anatomically realistic three-dimensional finite element modeling can closely simulate internal defibrillation in humans. This may prove useful for characterizing patient-specific factors that influence clinically relevant properties of current density distributions and defibrillation energy requirements of various ICD electrode configurations.     

Relationship between efficacy of defibrillation shocks and frequency characteristics of shock waveforms

INTRODUCTION: Using the Fourier transform, it is possible to replace each time domain representation of a defibrillatory shock by a unique frequency domain representation in which the shock waveform is defined in terms of a complex number function of frequency and typically described as an amplitude in amperes per hertz (or, closely related, joules per hertz) and an associated frequency-dependent phase angle. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present article describes the conceptual basis of the Fourier transform, sketches a simplified mathematical framework for deriving frequency domain parameters, considers properties crucial to interpreting defibrillatory-type shocks when expressed in the frequency domain, and then presents a series of shock waveforms in the frequency domain. Although not definitive, knowledge of the energy distribution with frequency alone, usually presented in joules per hertz, is shown to yield considerable insight into the probable comparable efficacy of uniphasic/biphasic rectangular, untruncated/truncated uniphasic exponential, and various biphasic "single capacitor" waveforms. CONCLUSION: In general, efficacy in achieving ventricular defibrillation is improved by parameter changes that shift a larger percentage of the delivered energy into a mid-frequency range (very roughly, 40 to 160 Hz). With further study, the frequency domain approach may prove to be a useful tool in the a priori selection of optimal defibrillatory shock waveforms.     

Ventricular fibrillation-induced intracellular Ca2+ overload causes failed electrical defibrillation and post-shock reinitiation of fibrillation

Despite high efficacy, electrical defibrillation shocks can fail or ventricular fibrillation (VF) is reinitiated after the application of the initial shock. The goal of this study was to determine whether [Ca2+]i overload, induced by VF itself, can cause failed electrical defibrillation and post-shock reinitiation of VF. For this purpose, we simultaneously measured [Ca2+]i transients (assessed by indo-1 fluorescence) and defibrillation energies (assessed by a modified implantable cardioverter defibrillator) in intact perfused rat hearts during pacing-induced sustained VF (10 min) in the absence of ischemia. We found that increasing [Ca2+]i during VF (by increasing [Ca2+]o from 3 to 6 mM) increased the defibrillation threshold (DFT) from 1.9 +/- 0.6 to 3.5 +/- 0.5 J/g (P<0.05) and also increased the total defibrillation energy (TDE) required for stabilization of sinus rhythm from 15.6 +/- 7.7 to 48.6 +/- 7.42 J/g (P<0.05). In addition, both DFT and TDE correlated linearly with [Ca2+]i (r=0.69 and 0.83, P<0.05). Furthermore, shortening the duration of VF from 10 to 1.5 min tended to limit [Ca2+]i overload and decreased TDE. Finally, all successful defibrillation shocks led to a sudden reduction of VF-induced [Ca2+]i overload (-115 +/- 3%). In contrast, failed shocks did not alter [Ca2+]i. Incomplete reduction of [Ca2+]i overload after initially successful shocks were often followed by synchronized spontaneous [Ca2+]i oscillations and subsequent reinitiation of VF. In conclusion, the present study showed for the first time that VF-induced [Ca2+]i overload can cause failed electrical defibrillation and post-shock reinitiation of VF. Because VF inevitably causes [Ca2+]i overload, this finding might be a crucial mechanism of failed defibrillation and spontaneous reinitiation of VF.