On the interrelationship of transreaction with viscoelastic properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene naphthalate) blends in the presence of nanoclay

An attempt was made to explore the effects of the interchange reactions on the viscoelastic behavior of binary blends based on poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN) and their nanocomposites. It was seen that with an increase in the number of extrusion runs and mixing temperature, the extent of reaction (X) and degree of randomness (RD) both increased, whereas the average sequence block lengths values were decreased. On the contrary, the blend composition did not play a significant role on X and RD values. Addition of nanoclay inhibited the transreactions in PET/PEN blends. The absence of crystallization peaks implied that the crystalline structure was destroyed as a result of blending and an amorphous system was created possibly due to the transreactions simultaneously with the formation of random copolymers inhibiting the crystallization process. The rheological investigations showed that the addition of PEN into the PEN/PET blends enhanced the storage modulus, loss modulus, and complex viscosity. The viscosity upswing observed at low‐frequency region in the case of nanocomposite systems evidently confirmed the occurrence of transreactions. Nonetheless, a significant increment in the viscoelastic properties was perceived in the presence of nanoclay corroborating the proper nanoclay distribution throughout the PET/PEN blend system. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 53:2556–2567, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Primary structure and physical properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene naphthalate) resin blends

The morphology and properties of blends of poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) that were injection molded under various conditions were studied. Under injection molding conditions that make it possible to secure transparency, blends did not show clear crystallinity at blending ratios of more than 20 mol% in spite of the fact that crystallinity can be observed in the range of PEN content up to 30 mol%. Because both transparency and crystallinity could be secured with a PEN 12 mol% blend, this material was used in injection molding experiments with various injection molding cycles. Whitening occurred with a cycle of 20 sec, and transparency was obtained at 30 sec or more. This was attributed to the fact that transesterification between PET and PEN exceeded 5 mol% and phase solubility (compatibility) between the PET and PEN increased when the injection molding time was 30 sec or longer. However, when the transesterification content exceeded 8 mol%, molecularly oriented crystallization did not occur, even under stretching, and consequently, it was not possible to increase the strength of the material by stretching. PET/PEN blend resins are more easily crystallized by stretch heat‐setting than are PET/PEN copolymer resins. It was understood that this is because residual PET, which has not undergone transesterification, contributes to crystallization. However, because transesterification reduces crystallinity, the heat‐set density of blends did not increase as significantly as that of pure PET, even in high temperature heat‐setting. Gas permeability showed the same tendency as density. Namely, pure PET showed a substantial decrease in oxygen transmission after high temperature heat‐setting, but the decrease in gas permeability in the blend material was small at heat‐set temperatures of 140°C and higher.     

Uniaxial orientation and tensile properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene-2,6-naphthalate) blends

Amorphous films of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene-2,6-naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends with different blend ratios were uniaxially drawn by solid-state coextrusion and the structure development during solid state deformation was studied. As-prepared blends showed two T_gs. The lower T_g was ∼72 °C, independent of the blend ratio. In contrast, the higher T_g increased with increasing PEN content. Thus, the coextrusion was carried out around the higher T_g of the sample. At a given draw ratio of 5, which was close to the achievable maximum draw ratio, the tensile strength of the drawn samples from the initially amorphous state increased gradually with increasing PEN content. On the other hand, the tensile modulus was found to decrease initially, reaching a minimum at 40-60 wt% PEN, and then increased as the PEN content increased. The results indicate that we can get the drawn films with a moderate tensile modulus and a high tensile strength. The drawn samples from the blends containing 40-60 wt% of PEN showed a maximum elongation at break, and a maximum thermal shrinkage around 100 °C. Also, the degree of stress-induced crystallinity showed a broad minimum around the blend ratio of 50% of PEN. These morphological characteristics explained well the effects of blend ratio on the tensile modulus and strength of drawn PET/PEN blend films.     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were investigated by DSC as functions of crystallization temperature, blend composition, and PET and PEN source. Isothermal crystallization kinetics were evaluated in terms of the Avrami equation. The Avrami exponent (n) is different for PET, PEN, and the blends, indicating different crystallization mechanisms occurring in blends than those in pure PET and PEN. Activation energies of crystallization were calculated from the rate constants, using an Arrhenius‐type expression. Regime theory was used to elucidate the crystallization course of PET/PEN blends as well as that of unblended PET and PEN. The transition from regime II to regime III was clearly observed for each blend sample as the crystallization temperature was decreased. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 23–37, 2001     

Glass‐transition and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The glass‐transition temperatures and melting behaviors of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were studied. Two blend systems were used for this work, with PET and PEN of different grades. It was found that T_g increases almost linearly with blend composition. Both the Gibbs–DiMarzio equation and the Fox equation fit experimental data very well, indicating copolymer‐like behavior of the blend systems. Multiple melting peaks were observed for all blend samples as well as for PET and PEN. The equilibrium melting point was obtained using the Hoffman–Weeks method. The melting points of PET and PEN were depressed as a result of the formation of miscible blends and copolymers. The Flory–Huggins theory was used to study the melting‐point depression for the blend system, and the Nishi–Wang equation was used to calculate the interaction parameter (χ₁₂). The calculated χ₁₂ is a small negative number, indicating the formation of thermodynamically stable, miscible blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 11–22, 2001     

Effects of electron beam irradiation on poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends

The effect of electron beam (EB) irradiation on the properties and compatibility of poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) blends was investigated. Upon EB irradiation, PEN/PET blends underwent transesterification reactions, resulting in the formation of more random copolymers from the original binary pair. The degree of transesterification increased with dose rate, and all of the irradiated blends exhibited a single glass transition temperature. This indicated that transesterification reactions promoted by EB irradiation led to the formation of a single phase. Transesterification reactions promoted by EB irradiation led to more random copolymers, and the reduced regularity in the irradiated blends decreased the melting temperature. A higher degree of randomness and lower number‐average sequence lengths for the blend systems indicated that a more random chain structure was formed in the blends. The rheological measurements demonstrated that the irradiated PEN/PET blends were miscible. EB irradiation could promote transesterification reaction, thus enhancing the compatibility of PEN/PET blends.     

Compatibilized poly(ether imide)/amorphous polyamide blends by means of poly(ethylene terephthalate) addition

Compatibilized poly(ether imide)/amorphous polyamide (PEI/a‐PA) blends were obtained in the melt state by substitution of 20% PEI by poly(ethylene terephthalate), PET. The two amorphous phases of the blends comprised both a miscibilized 80/20 PEI/PET blend and an a‐PA‐rich phase in which small amounts of PET and probably PEI were present. The presence of PET in the two phases of most of the blends was the main reason for the clear decrease in the particle size that indicated compatibilization. The smaller interfacial tension of the blends after PET addition also proved that compatibilization had occurred. The deviation of the modulus with respect to the direct rule of mixtures was positive in PEI‐rich blends and negative in the blends very rich in a‐PA. The modulus values were tentatively attributed to a different orientation of the components of the blends in the blends and in the neat state. The clear increases in ductility and the impact strength after PET addition further demonstrated the compatibilization effect of PET. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46: 1292–1298, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Morphology and barrier mechanism of biaxially oriented poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

To improve the barrier properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), PET/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) blends with different concentrations of PEN were prepared and were then processed into biaxially oriented PET/PEN films. The air permeability of bioriented films of pure PET, pure PEN, and PET/PEN blends were tested by the differential pressure method. The morphology of the blends was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation of the impact fracture surfaces of extruded PET/PEN samples, and the morphology of the films was also investigated by SEM. The results of the study indicated that PEN could effectively improve the barrier properties of PET, and the barrier properties of the PET/PEN blends improved with increasing PEN concentration. When the PEN concentration was equal to or less than 30%, as in this study, the PET/PEN blends were phase‐separated; that is, PET formed the continuous phase, whereas PEN formed a dispersed phase of particles, and the interface was firmly integrated because of transesterification. After the PET/PEN blends were bioriented, the PET matrix contained a PEN microstructure consisting of parallel and extended, separate layers. This multilayer microstructure was characterized by microcontinuity, which resulted in improved barrier properties because air permeation was delayed as the air had to detour around the PEN layer structure. At a constant PEN concentration, the more extended the PEN layers were, the better the barrier properties were of the PET/PEN blends. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 1309–1316, 2006     

Analysis of the tensile modulus of poly(p‐hydroxybenzoate)/poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) ternary polyester composite fibers

Liquid crystalline polymer reinforced plastics were prepared by compounding (PHB/PEN/PET) blends. A fibrillar PHB structure was formed in situ in the PEN/PET matrix under a high elongational flow field during melt‐spinning of the composite fibers. The formation of PHB microfibrils in the composite fiber with different PHB contents and winding speeds was observed. The PHB microfibril reinforced PEN/PET composite fibers exhibited an unexpectedly low tensile modulus. We have evaluated the tensile modulus of the fibers using the non‐modified 22 and a modified 23 Halpin–Tsai model. From the analysis of both models, large differences were found between the theoretical and experimental values of the tensile modulus, and the low value of the tensile modulus of the composite fiber could not adequately be explained by either model. Thus, we analyzed the observed modulus values using the Takayanagi model, 24 which describes the concept of mechanical discontinuities in semi‐crystalline polymers. Using the Takayanagi model, the effective fraction of continuous or discontinuous microfibrils was evaluated. Consequently, we could successfully explain the very low modulus of the PHB/PEN/PET composite fiber, having a large number of PHB microfibrils, using the Takayanagi model. Copyright © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

PEN/PET共混物结晶行为研究

用差示扫描量热法(DSC)研究了不同共混比例PEN/PET共混物的熔体结晶行为,并进行了等温结晶动力学测定。结果表明:随着两种组分向中间比例(50/50)靠近,共混物的熔融温度越低,结晶速率也越慢。     

Compatibility in immiscible polysulfone/poly(ethylene terephthalate) blends

Polysulfone (PSU)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) blends were obtained by direct injection molding across the composition range. Their phase behavior, thermal properties, morphology, and mechanical properties were measured. The blends were composed of a pure PSU amorphous phase and either a pure PET phase in PSU‐poor blends, or a PET‐rich phase with some dissolved PSU in PSU‐rich blends. The morphology of the dispersed phase was mostly spherical with some elongated particles in the PET‐rich blends. A slight synergistic behavior was observed in the Young's modulus, mainly in the 90/10 blend, which is probably due to orientation effects. The presence of some broken particles indicated some interfacial adhesion. The ductility values were approximately linear with composition. This was generally the case in PSU‐rich blends, and was attributed to the higher level of PSU in the PET‐rich phase. Although embrittlement was seen in blends with 30% of the second component, the ductility of the two pure components did not significantly decrease after annealing due to the presence of low amounts (up to 10%) of another component of the blend. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 2193–2200, 2004     

Thermal decomposition behavior of poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate)/silica nanocomposites

Poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) nanocomposites reinforced with silica nanoparticles were prepared by direct melt compounding. Dynamic thermogravimetric analysis was conducted on the PEN/silica nanocomposites to clarify the effect of silica nanoparticle on the thermal decomposition behavior of the resultant nanocomposites. There is a significant dependence of thermal decomposition behavior for PEN/silica nanocomposites on the content of silica nanoparticles and heating rate. The variation of the activation energy for thermal decomposition reflected the improvement of the thermal stability of the PEN/silica nanocomposites. The unique characteristics of silica nanoparticles resulted in physical barrier effect against the thermal decomposition, leading to the enhancement of the thermal stability of the PEN/silica nanocomposites. The incorporation of silica nanoparticles into the PEN matrix increased the storage modulus of the PEN/silica nanocomposites and made it possible for them to sustain higher modulus at higher temperature relative to pure PEN. POLYM. COMPOS., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Transesterification reactions in triphenyl phosphite additivated‐poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene naphthalate) blends

The occurrence of transesterification reactions in poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN) blends prepared in presence of triphenyl phosphite (TPP) was investigated. When PEN was processed with TPP, which is a known chain extender for PET, chain extension reactions also took place. Torqueprocessing time curves obtained during preparation of 75/25 PET/PEN blends containing TPP, showed a build‐up profile followed by a fast decrease that was interpreted as chain extension between blend components and degradation due to phosphite residues formation, respectively. Although transesterification inhibition was expected, this type of reaction was not suppressed by TPP.     

Multiwall‐carbon‐nanotube‐reinforced poly(ethylene terephthalate) nanocomposites by melt compounding

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) nanocomposites reinforced with multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were prepared through melt compounding in a twin‐screw extruder. The presence of MWCNTs, which acted as good nucleating agents, enhanced the crystallization of PET through heterogeneous nucleation. The incorporation of a small quantity of MWCNTs improved the thermal stability of the PET/MWCNT nanocomposites. The mechanical properties of the PET/MWCNT nanocomposites increased with even a small quantity of MWCNTs. There was a significant dependence of the rheological properties of the PET/MWCNT nanocomposites on the MWCNT content. The MWCNT loading increased the shear‐thinning nature of the polymer‐nanocomposite melt. The storage modulus and loss modulus of the PET/MWCNT nanocomposites increased with increasing frequency, and this increment effect was more pronounced at lower frequencies. At higher MWCNT contents, the dominant nanotube–nanotube interactions led to the formation of interconnected or networklike structures of MWCNTs in the PET/MWCNT nanocomposites. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 1450–1457, 2007     

Study of the miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blends

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl alcohol) (PEO/PVA) blends were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and polarizing optical microscopy. Because the glass‐transition temperature of PVA was near the melting point of PEO crystalline, an uncommon DSC procedure was used to determine the glass‐transition temperature of the PVA‐rich phase. From the DSC and DMA results, two glass‐transition temperatures, which corresponded to the PEO‐rich phase and the PVA‐rich phase, were observed. It was an important criterion to indicate that a blend was immiscible. It was also found that the preparation method of samples influenced the morphology and crystallization behaviors of PEO/PVA blends. The domain size of the disperse phase (PVA‐rich) for the solution‐cast blends was much larger than that for the coprecipitated blends. The crystallinity, spherulitic morphology, and isothermal crystallization behavior of PEO in the solution‐cast blends were similar to those of the neat PEO. On the contrary, these properties in the coprecipitated blends were different from those of the neat PEO. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 1562–1568, 2004     

Crystallization behaviors and mechanical properties of poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate)/multiwall carbon nanotube nanocomposites

Carbon nanotube (CNT)‐reinforced poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PEN) nanocomposites were prepared by direct melt blending process in a twin‐screw extruder. There is significant dependence of the crystallization and melting behavior of PEN/CNT nanocomposites on CNT content and crystallization temperature. The incorporation of CNT may favor the formation of the β‐form crystals in PEN/CNT nanocomposites, and more CNT content amplified this effect. In this PEN/CNT nanocomposite system, the CNT promoted the nucleation and the growth with higher crystallization rate of PEN/CNT nanocomposites, and simultaneously reduced the fold surface free energy and the work required in folding polymer chains in the polymer nanocomposites. In addition, the incorporation of a very small quantity of CNT significantly improved the mechanical properties of PEN/CNT nanocomposites. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:1715–1723, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Microstructure and crystallization of melt‐mixed poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene isophthalate) blends

Physical blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene isophthalate) (PEI), abbreviated PET/PEI (80/20) blends, and of PET and a random poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate) copolymer containing 40% ethylene isophthalate (PET₆₀I₄₀), abbreviated PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends, were melt‐mixed at 270°C for different reactive blending times to give a series of copolymers containing 20 mol % of ethylene isophthalic units with different degrees of randomness. ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy precisely determined the microstructure of the blends. The thermal and mechanical properties of the blends were evaluated by DSC and tensile assays, and the obtained results were compared with those obtained for PET and a statistically random PETI copolymer with the same composition. The microstructure of the blends gradually changed from a physical blend into a block copolymer, and finally into a random copolymer with the advance of transreaction time. The melting temperature and enthalpy of the blends decreased with the progress of melt‐mixing. Isothermal crystallization studies carried out on molten samples revealed the same trend for the crystallization rate. The effect of reaction time on crystallizability was more pronounced in the case of the PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends. The Young's modulus of the melt‐mixed blends was comparable to that of PET, whereas the maximum tensile stress decreased with respect to that of PET. All blend samples showed a noticeable brittleness. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 3076–3086, 2003     

Morphology and barrier properties of oriented blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate) with poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol)

Morphology and oxygen permeability studies were carried out for blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate), PET, and poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate), PEN, with poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol), EVOH. PET/EVOH blends are seen as a possible substitute for poly(vinylidene chloride)-coated PET packaging films. The effects of several processing parameters such as draw temperature and draw ratio on blend morphology and barrier properties suggest that the morphology of the EVOH phase dictates to a large extent the oxygen permeabilities of these blends. The relationships between morphology and oxygen permeability and explained are explained by consideration of two-phase conduction models. The model of Fricke is found to be a good predictor of the barrier properties of the PET/EVOH system. The oxygen permeability of PET was reduced by a factor of 4.2 with the addition of 20 wt% EVOH and that of PEN by a factor of 2.7 with the addition of 15 wt% EVOH. Water vapor permeabilities and mechanical properties of PET and PEN were only slightly affected by the addition of 15 wt% EVOH.     

Preparation and properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/ATO nanocomposites

Antimony doped tin oxide (ATO) nanoparticles modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) composites used for manufacturing antistatic PET fiber were synthesized by in situ polymerization. The crystallization and multiple melting behavior of the nanocomposites were systemically investigated by means of Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR), X‐ray Diffraction (XRD) techniques. The degree of crystallinity in nanocomposites increased with increasing ATO content. Smaller and more incomplete crystals are presented in the crystalline regions of the nanocomposites with increasing the content of ATO, which could be attributed to heterogeneous nucleation effects of ATO nanoparticles. Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) measurements showed that the storage moduli of the nanocomposites increased with increasing the content of ATO, due to formation of immobilized layer between polymer and filler. The interactions between ATO and PET molecules result in high tan δ for the PET/ATO nanocomposites. Percolation threshold of PET/ATO hybrid fibers prepared by the nanocomposites at room temperature was as low as 1.05 wt %, much lower than that of the composites filled with conventional conductive particles. Adding ATO nanoparticles obviously improves the conductivity of PET. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)–poly(ethylene naphthalene 2,6‐dicarboxylate) blends with montmorillonite clay

The production and properties of blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene naphthalene 2,6‐dicarboxylate) (PEN) with three modified clays are reported. Octadecylammonium chloride and maleic anhydride (MAH) are used to modify the surface of the montmorillonite–Na⁺ clay particles (clay–Na⁺) to produce clay–C18 and clay–MAH, respectively, before they are mixed with the PET/PEN system. The transesterification degree, hydrophobicity and the effect of the clays on the mechanical, rheological and thermal properties are analysed. The PET–PEN/clay–C18 system does not show any improvements in the mechanical properties, which is attributed to poor exfoliation. On the other hand, in the PET–PEN/clay–MAH blends, the modified clay restricts crystallization of the matrix, as evidenced in the low value of the crystallization enthalpy. The process‐induced PET–PEN transesterification reaction is affected by the clay particles. Clay–C18 induces the largest proportion of naphthalate–ethylene–terephthalate (NET) blocks, as opposed to clay–Na⁺ which renders the lowest proportion. The clay readily incorporates in the bulk polymer, but receding contact‐angle measurements reveal a small influence of the particles on the surface properties of the sample. The clay–Na⁺ blend shows a predominant solid‐like behaviour, as evidenced by the magnitude of the storage modulus in the low‐frequency range, which reflects a high entanglement density and a substantial degree of polymer–particle interactions. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry