Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials

A series of psychophysical lifting studies was conducted to establish maximum acceptable weights of lift (MAWL) for three supply items commonly handled in underground coal mines (rock dust bags, ventilation stopping blocks, and crib blocks). Each study utilized 12 subjects, all of whom had considerable experience working in underground coal mines. Effects of lifting in four postures (standing, stooping under a 1·5m ceiling, stooping under a l·2m ceiling, and kneeling) were investigated together with four lifting conditions (combinations of lifting symmetry and lifting height). The frequency of lifting was set at four per min, and the task duration was 15?min. Posture significantly affected the MAWL for the rock dust bag (standing MAWL was 7% greater than restricted postures and kneeling MAWL was 6·4% less than stooped); however, posture interacted with lifting conditions for both of the other materials. Physiological costs were found to be significantly greater in the stooped postures compared with kneeling for all materials. Other contrasts (standing versus restricted postures, stooping under 1·5?m ceiling versus stooping under l·2?m ceiling) did not exhibit significantly different levels of energy expenditure. Energy expenditure was significantly affected by vertical lifting height; however, the plane of lifting had little influence on metabolic cost. Recommended acceptable workloads for the three materials are 20·0?kg for the rock dust bag, 16·5?kg for the ventilation stopping block, and 14·7?kg for the crib block. These results suggest that miners are often required to lift supplies that are substantially heavier than psychophysically acceptable lifting limits.     

Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures

Eight healthy, male underground coal miners (mean age = 36.9 yrs +/- 4.5 SD) participated in a study examining psychophysically acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined lifting and lowering tasks in restricted head-room conditions. Independent variables included posture (stooping or kneeling on two knees), task symmetry (symmetric or asymmetric), and vertical lift distance (35 cm or 60 cm). All tasks were 10 min in duration and were performed under a 1.22 m ceiling to restrict the subject's posture. Subjects were required to raise and lower a lifting box every 10s, and asked to adjust the box weight to the maximum amount they could handle without undue strain or fatigue. During the final 5 min of each test, data were collected to determine the energy expenditure requirements of the task. Results of this study demonstrated that psychophysical lifting capacity averaged 11.3% lower when kneeling as compared to stooping. Subjects selected 3.5% more weight in asymmetric tasks, and lifted 5.0% less weight to the 60 cm shelf compared to the 35 cm shelf. Heart rate was not significantly affected by posture, but was increased an average of 4 beats/min in asymmetric conditions, and by 3.5 beats/min while lifting/lowering to/from the high shelf. Oxygen uptake was increased by 9% when stooped, by 10% when lifting/lowering asymmetrically, and by 8.2% when performing the task to the high shelf. Results of this study indicate that, wherever possible, materials that must be lifted manually in low-seam coal mines be designed in accordance with the decreased lifting capacity exhibited in the kneeling posture.     

Acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined manual handling tasks in restricted postures

Eight healthy, male underground coal miners (mean age=36·9 yrs±4·5 SD) participated in a study examining psychophysical acceptable weights and physiological costs of performing combined lifting and lowering tasks in restricted headroom conditions. Independent variables included posture (stooping or kneeling on two knees), task symmetry (symmetric or asymmetric), and vertical lift distance (35 cm or 60cm). All tasks were 10min in duration and were performed under a 1·22 m ceiling to restrict the subject's posture. Subjects were required to raise and lower a lifting box every 10 s, and asked to adjust the box weight to the maximum amount they could handle without undue strain or fatigue. During the final 5 min of each test, data were collected to determine the energy expenditure requirements of the task. Results of this study demonstrated that psychophysical lifting capacity averaged 11·3% lower when kneeling as compared to stooping. Subjects selected 3·5% more weight in asymmetric tasks, and lifted 5·0% less weight to the 60 cm shelf compared to the 35 cm shelf. Heart rate was not significantly affected by posture, but was increased an average of 4 beats/min in asymmetric conditions, and by 3·5 beats/min while lifting/lowering to/from the high shelf. Oxygen uptake was increased by 9% when stooped, by 10% when lifting/lowering asymmetrically, and by 8·2% when performing the task to the high shelf. Results of this study indicate that, wherever possible, materials that must be lifted manually in low-seam coal mines be designed in accordance with the decreased lifting capacity exhibited in the kneeling posture.     

Lifting in stooped and kneeling postures: Effects on lifting capacity,metabolic costs,and electromyography of eight trunk muscles

Twelve healthy, experienced underground coal miners performed lifting capacity tests in stooped and kneeling postures using a modified psychophysical, procedure. Subjects adjusted weight in a lifting box to the maximum they could handle without undue fatigue in an asymmetric lifting task. Lifting periods were 20 min in duration and the frequency was 10 lifts/min. Tests were performed under a 48-in. roof that restricted the subject's posture. Psychophysical, physiological, and biomechanical dependent measures included the maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL), heart rate (HR), rate of oxygen consumption (V̇O₂), ventilation volume rate (V̇_E), respiratory exchange ratio (R), and integrated electromyography (EMG) of eight trunk muscles. Results indicated that the MAWL was significantly lower when kneeling than when stooped (p < 0.05). Furthermore, metabolic demands were greater in terms of HR (p < 0.005) and VO₂ (p < 0.05) when kneeling. Left and right erectores spinae muscles exhibited increased EMG activity in the kneeling posture (p < 0.001). It was concluded that psychophysical lifting capacity is decreased, while the metabolic stress and internal load on the spine are increased, in the kneeling posture. Results of this Bureau of Mines study indicate that it may be advisable to reduce the weight of materials that are handled repetitively in the kneeling posture.     

Dynamic biomechanical modelling of symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks in restricted postures

This article describes investigations of dynamic biomechanical stresses associated with lifting in stooping and kneeling postures. Twelve subjects volunteered to participate in two lifting experiments each having two levels of posture (stooped or kneeling), two levels of lifting height (350 or 700 mm), and three levels of weight (15,20, or 25 kg). One study examined sagitally symmetric lifting, the other examined an asymmetric task. In each study, subjects lifted and lowered a box every 10 s for a period of 2 min in each treatment combination. Electromyography (EMG) of eight trunk muscles was collected during a specified lift. The EMG data, normalized to maximum extension and flexion exertions in each posture, was used to predict compression and shear forces at the L3 level of the lumbar spine. A comparison of symmetric and asymmetric lifting indicated that the average lumbar compression was greater in sagittal plane tasks; however, both anterior-posterior and lateral shear forces acting on the lumbar spine were increased with asymmetric lifts. Analysis of muscle recruitment indicated that the demands of lifting asymmetrically are shifted to ancillary muscles possessing smaller cross-sectional areas, which may be at greater risk of injury during manual materials handling (MMH) tasks. Model estimates indicated increased compression when kneeling, but increased shear forces when stooping. Increasing box weight and lifting height both significantly increased compressive and shear loading on the lumbar spine. A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated complex muscle recruitment schemes—each treatment combination elicited a unique pattern of muscle recruitment. The results of this investigation will help to evaluate safe loads for lifting in these restricted postures.     

Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task

This study evaluated spinal loads associated with lifting and hanging heavy mining cable in a variety of postures. This electrical cable can weigh up to 10 kg per metre and is often lifted in restricted spaces in underground coal mines. Seven male subjects performed eight cable lifting and hanging tasks, while trunk kinematic data and trunk muscle electromyograms (EMGs) were obtained. The eight tasks were combinations of four postures (standing, stooping, kneeling on one knee, or kneeling on both knees) and two levels of cable load (0 N or 100 N load added to the existing cable weight). An EMG-assisted model was used to calculate forces and moments acting on the lumbar spine. A two-way split-plot ANOVA showed that increased load (p < 0.05) and changes in lifting posture (p < 0.05) independently affected trunk muscle recruitment and spinal loading. The increase in cable load resulted in higher EMG activity of all trunk muscles and increased axial and lateral bending moments on the spine (p < 0.05). Changes in posture caused more selective adjustments in muscle recruitment and affected the sagittal plane moment (p < 0.05). Despite the more selective nature of trunk EMG changes due to posture, the magnitude of changes in spinal loading was often quite dramatic. However, average compression values exceeded 3400 N for all cable lifting tasks.     

Review of:“Sex Differences in Human PerformanceEdited by M. A. BAKER (Chichester,England: John Wiley, 1987.) [Pp. xvi + 202.] £22·00. ISBN 0-471-91119-4.

An experiment was conducted to examine the role that maximal lifting power has in predicting maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) for a frequency of one lift per 8 h. The secondary aim of the study was to compare the ability of power to predict MAWL to previously used measures of capacity including two measures of isometric strength, five measures of isokinetic strength, and isoinertial capacity on an incremental lifting test. Twenty-five male subjects volunteered to participate in the experiment. The isometric tests involved maximum voluntary contractions for composite lifting strength at vertical heights of 15 and 75 cm. Peak isokinetic strength was measured at velocities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 m s^?1 using a modified CYBEX® II isokinetic dynamometer. Isoinertial lifting capactity was measured on the X-factor incremental lifting machine and peak power was measured on the incremental lifting machine by having subjects lift a 25 kg load as quickly as possible. The results indicate that peak isoinertial power is significantly correlated with MAWL, and this correlation was higher than any of the correlations between the other predictor variables and MAWL. The relationships between the isokinetic strength measures and MAWL were stronger than the relationships between the isometric measures and MAWL. Overall, the results suggest that tests used to predict MAWL should be dynamic rather than static.     

Lifting in four restricted lifting conditions: psychophysical, physiological and biomechanical effects of lifting in stooped and kneeling postures

Many underground coal mines are less than 1.2 m in height, and require that manual lifting tasks be performed in restricted postures (usually stooped or kneeling). Unfortunately, little is known about how these postures affect the underground coal miner's capabilities to perform such work. A previous Bureau of Mines study indicated that lifting capacity is greater when stooped than kneeling when lifting under a 1.2 m roof height (Gallagher et al, 1988). However, many low-seam coal mines present even more restricted headroom than 1.2 m. Therefore, a study was conducted to: (1) examine the psychophysical lifting capacity of low-seam coal miners under four restricted lifting conditions, (2) investigate the associated metabolic costs, and (3) analyse the electromyography (EMG) of trunk muscles when lifting in these restricted positions. Subjects were 12 coal miners accustomed to handling materials in restricted postures (mean age = 35.9 yrs +/- 6.4 SD). Results of this study indicated that lifting capacity was greater when the subjects could assume a stooped posture than when kneeling (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the metabolic cost was greater in the kneeling posture for heart rate (p < 0.001), oxygen consumption (p < 0.001), minute ventilation (p < 0.05] ), and respiratory exchange ratio (p < 0.05), despite the fact that miners lifted less weight in this posture. Analysis of the EMG data indicated increased activity of the electores spinae when kneeling (p < 0.001), but higher latissimus dorsi activity when stopped (p < 0.001). The findings of this study indicate that the weight of supply items should be reduced approximately 14-18% when the kneeling posture must be used for lifting.     

Obesity does not reduce maximum acceptable weights of lift

The maximum acceptable weights of lift (MAWL) of obese and non-obese participants were empirically investigated. Three obesity levels were considered: non-obese (18.5 kg/m(2)< or= body mass index (BMI)or= 40 kg/m(2)). Ten male and 10 female participants were recruited for each obesity level. The participants determined their MAWL for 18 different lifting task conditions (six lifting frequencies x three lifting heights). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine the effects of obesity level, gender, lifting height, lifting frequency and their interactions on MAWL. Overall, the ANOVA results indicated that obesity does not reduce MAWL, and thus, suggested that the existing MAWL data can be used to accommodate both general and obese workers. However, further studies based on the biomechanical and physiological approaches are required to provide more complete understanding of obesity effects on lifting tolerance limits.     

Prediction of the maximum acceptable weight of lift from the frequency of lift

It is known that maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) decreases as the frequency of lifting increases. The purpose of this study was to quantify the relationship between lifting frequency and the MAWL, and to generate models for predicting the mean MAWLs for males and females from frequency of lifting. Published experimental studies that have reported the MAWL at different lifting frequencies were identified and regression methods were used to evaluate the relationship between the frequency of lifting and the MAWL. The best fitting models were logarithmic but they accounted for less than 50% of the variance. This reflects the heterogeneity of the experiments included. Normalising the MAWL to the MAWL at one lift per minute improved the predictive power of the models, accounting for more than 80% of the variance. Linear and power models for predicting work rate in kg/min showed even higher levels of accuracy.     

Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task

This study evaluated spinal loads associated with lifting and hanging heavy mining cable in a variety of postures. This electrical cable can weigh up to 10 kg per metre and is often lifted in restricted spaces in underground coal mines. Seven male subjects performed eight cable lifting and hanging tasks, while trunk kinematic data and trunk muscle electromyograms (EMGs) were obtained. The eight tasks were combinations of four postures (standing, stooping, kneeling on one knee, or kneeling on both knees) and two levels of cable load (0 N or 100 N load added to the existing cable weight). An EMG-assisted model was used to calculate forces and moments acting on the lumbar spine. A two-way split-plot ANOVA showed that increased load (p<0.05) and changes in lifting posture (p<0.05) independently affected trunk muscle recruitment and spinal loading. The increase in cable load resulted in higher EMG activity of all trunk muscles and increased axial and lateral bending moments on the spine (p<0.05). Changes in posture caused more selective adjustments in muscle recruitment and affected the sagittal plane moment (p<0.05). Despite the more selective nature of trunk EMG changes due to posture, the magnitude of changes in spinal loading was often quite dramatic. However, average compression values exceeded 3400 N for all cable lifting tasks.     

Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting

It is unclear whether the maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL), a common psychophysical method, reflects joint kinetics when different lifting techniques are employed. In a within-participants study (n = 12), participants performed three lifting techniques--free style, stoop and squat lifting from knee to waist level--using the same dynamic functional capacity evaluation lifting test to assess MAWL and to calculate low back and knee kinetics. We assessed which knee and back kinetic parameters increased with the load mass lifted, and whether the magnitudes of the kinetic parameters were consistent across techniques when lifting MAWL. MAWL was significantly different between techniques (p = 0.03). The peak lumbosacral extension moment met both criteria: it had the highest association with the load masses lifted (r > 0.9) and was most consistent between the three techniques when lifting MAWL (ICC = 0.87). In conclusion, MAWL reflects the lumbosacral extension moment across free style, stoop and squat lifting in healthy young males, but the relation between the load mass lifted and lumbosacral extension moment is different between techniques. PRACTITIONER SUMMARY: Tests of maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) from knee to waist height are used to assess work capacity of individuals with low-back disorders. This article shows that the MAWL reflects the lumbosacral extension moment across free style, stoop and squat lifting in healthy young males, but the relation between the load mass lifted and lumbosacral extension moment is different between techniques. This suggests that standardisation of lifting technique used in tests of the MAWL would be indicated if the aim is to assess the capacity of the low back.     

Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females

This study used the psychophysical approach to evaluate the effects of asymmetric lifting on the maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) and the resulting heart rate, oxygen uptake and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). A randomized complete block factorial design was employed. Twelve female college students lifted weights at three different lifting frequencies (one-time maximum, 1 and 4 lifts/min) in the sagittal plane and at three different asymmetric angles (30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees ) from the floor to a 68-cm height pallet. This lifting experiment was conducted for a 1-h work period using a free-style lifting technique. The MAWLs for asymmetric lifting were significantly lower than those for symmetric lifting in the sagittal plane. The MAWL decreased with the increase in the angle of asymmetry. However, the heart rate, oxygen uptake and RPE remained unchanged. Though the MAWL decreased significantly with lifting frequency, both the physiological costs (heart rate and oxygen uptake) and rating of perceived exertion increased with the increase in lift frequency. The most stressed body part was the arm. Lifting frequency had no significant effect on the percentage decrease in MAWL from the sagittal plane values. On average, decreases of 5%, 9% and 14% for MAWL at 30 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees asymmetric lifting, respectively, were revealed. This result was in agreement with the findings of Chinese males studied by Wu [Int. J. Ind. Ergonom. 25 (2000) 675]. The percentage decrease in MAWL with twisting angle for the Chinese participants was somewhat lower than those for Occidental participants. In addition, even though there was an increase in heart rate and RPE with the increase in the symmetrical lift angle for Occidental participants, it was different from the Chinese participants. Lastly, the 1991 NIOSH equation asymmetry multiplier is more conservative in comparison with the results of the present study.     

Maximal and sub-maximal functional lifting performance at different platform heights

Introducing valid physical employment tests requires identifying and developing a small number of practical tests that provide broad coverage of physical performance across the full range of job tasks. This study investigated discrete lifting performance across various platform heights reflective of common military lifting tasks. Sixteen Australian Army personnel performed a discrete lifting assessment to maximal lifting capacity (MLC) and maximal acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) at four platform heights between 1.30 and 1.70 m. There were strong correlations between platform height and normalised lifting performance for MLC (R² = 0.76 ± 0.18, p < 0.05) and MAWL (R² = 0.73 ± 0.21, p < 0.05). The developed relationship allowed prediction of lifting capacity at one platform height based on lifting capacity at any of the three other heights, with a standard error of < 4.5 kg and < 2.0 kg for MLC and MAWL, respectively.     

Psychophysical acceptability and perception of load heaviness by females

The objective of the study was to evaluate subjective perceptions of load heaviness, and relate these perceptions to the maximal acceptable weights of lift. Ten female college students experienced in manual lifting participated in the study. In the first experiment, subjects were asked to select one of the seven linguistic values of load heaviness (very light, light, less-than-medium, medium, more-than-medium, heavy, and very heavy), which would best describe the lifted loads. Seven boxes, ranging in weight between 2.3 kg and 22.7 kg, were used for that purpose. In the second experiment, subjects were asked to fill empty boxes to the level they felt would best reflect a given load heaviness category. In the third experiment, the psychophysical methodology was used to determine the maximal acceptable weight of lift for an 8-hour day. The results showed that 50% of the subjects considered a 20.4 kg box (45 lbs) as very heavy, while another 50% believed that such a load was heavy. The average load selected as maximal acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) for an 8-hour day was 16.4 kg (standard deviation (SD) = 5.3 kg). When asked to determine the weights that would best describe a given category of load heaviness, the subjects selected 22.5 kg (SD = 3.7 kg) and 18.4 kg (SD = 2.7 kg) for very heavy and heavy categories, respectively. Further analysis revealed that only 30% of the subjects selected MAWL values that were larger than the pre-weighted boxes independently judged by them as very heavy or heavy categories. Also, 10% and 30% of the subjects selected MAWL values that were larger than the weights chosen during the self-classification procedure as representative of heavy or very heavy categories of load heaviness, respectively. It was shown that the loads selected as the maximum acceptable weights for an 8 h shift were independently judged by the female subjects as being in the more-than-moderate or heavy weight categories. Comparison of the results for females and males led to a conclusion that female subjects were more realistic, with respect to subjective perception of load heaviness, in selecting the MAWL values than were male subjects.     

Psychophysically determined infrequent lifting capacity of Chinese participants.

The aim of this study was to investigate the psychophysical infrequent lifting capacity (maximum acceptable weight of lift, MAWL) for a Chinese population. A nested-factorial experimental design with a participant factor nested within gender was employed. Forty-one Chinese participants (29 males, 12 females) participated in the study. Two frequencies (one lift every 8 h and one lift every 5 min) and six lifting heights (floor to knuckle, floor to shoulder, floor to reach, knuckle to shoulder, knuckle to reach, shoulder to reach) were evaluated. The results are compared with prior studies and they lead to the following conclusions. (1) The MAWLs were significantly affected by both the lifting frequency and lifting height. For lifting frequency, the MAWLs decreased markedly by nearly 30% from one lift every 8 h to one lift every 5 min. For lifting height, the MAWLs of the F-K was the greatest of all six lifting heights, followed by F-S, K-S, F-R, K-R and S-R was the smallest. (2) The MAWLs for Chinese females are significantly lower, but proportionately similar, to the MAWLs for Chinese males. (3) The Chinese participants had smaller capacities compared with the Occidental participants, and the rate of decrease in MAWL for the Chinese participants was much sharper than that of Occidental participants. (4) The MAWL of Chinese females was about 54-58% of the Chinese males, it is somewhat lower than those of 60-70% of the Occidental participants.     

Psychophysically determined symmetric and asymmetric lifting capacity of Chinese males for one hour's work shifts

A laboratory experiment was conducted to determine the effects of asymmetric lifting on psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL) and the resulting heart rate, oxygen uptake and rating of perceived exertion. Thirteen male college students were recruited as participants. Each participant performed 12 different lifting tasks involving three lifting frequencies (one-time maximum, 1 and 4 lifts/min) and four twisting angles (including the sagittal plane and three different angles of asymmetry, i.e., 0, 30, 60, and 90°) from the floor to a 76 cm high pallet for one hour's work shift using a free-style lifting technique. The results showed that: (1) The MAWLs were significantly lower for asymmetric lifting than for symmetric lifting in the sagittal plane. The MAWL decreased with an increase in the angle of asymmetry, however, the heart rate, oxygen uptake and RPE remained unchanged; (2) Lifting frequency had no significant effect on the percentage decrease in MAWL from the sagittal plane values. Correction factors of 4, 9, and 13% for MAWL at 0, 30, 60, and 90°of asymmetric lifting, respectively, are recommended; (3) Both the physiological costs (heart rate and oxygen uptake) and rating of perceived exertion increased with an increase in lifting frequency though maximum acceptable weight of lift decreased. The most stressed body parts were the lower back and the arm; and (4) The percentage decrease in MAWL with twisting angle for the Chinese participants was somewhat lower than those of the Occidental participants. In addition, even though there was a decrease in MAWL, heart rate and RPE increased with an increase in the angle of a symmetric lifting for the Occidental participants, it was different from that of the Chinese participants.

Relevance to industry

It is generally believed that asymmetric lifting involving torso twisting is more harmful to back spine than symmetric lifting. However, the previous studies were conducted in Europe and North America, and the data were obtained from the Caucasian populations. This work, therefore, aims to investigate the influence of asymmetric lifting on the lifting capacity of the Chinese participants, and to compare the differences with the Occidental populations.     

Manual materials handling capabilities in non-standard postures

Research efforts to establish manual materials handling (MMH) capabilities of individuals and populations have been conducted for many years. Most of the previous efforts have explored ‘standard postures’, utilizing two-handed, symmetric, sagittal plane MMH using unrestricted postures. Recognizing that many industrial MMH activities do not utilize ‘standard postures’, recent research projects have explored psychophysicaly determined MMH capacities in a variety of non-standard postures. Among the non-standard postures examined were: twisting while lifting or lowering, lifting and lowering from lying, sitting, kneeling, and squatting positions, and carrying loads under conditions of constricted ceiling heights. This paper presents the results of a series of previous research efforts at Texas Tech University. The results are presented in the form of population capabilities of both males and females for 99 MMH tasks using ‘non-standard postures’. The data tables contain means and standard deviations of the data, as well as percentile distributions for the subject populations. Sample sizes for the experimental populations ranged from 45 to 50 subjects of each sex in the first three experiments to 20 subjects of each sex in the fourth set of experiments.     

Electromyography of the thigh muscles during lifting tasks in kneeling and squatting postures

Underground coal miners who work in low-seam mines frequently handle materials in kneeling or squatting postures. To assess quadriceps and hamstring muscle demands in these postures, nine participants performed lateral load transfers in kneeling and squatting postures, during which electromyographic (EMG) data were collected. EMG activity was obtained at five points throughout the transfer for three quadriceps muscles and two hamstring muscles from each thigh. ANOVA results indicated that EMG data for nine of 10 thigh muscles were affected by an interaction between posture and angular position of the load lifted (p < 0.001). Muscles of the right thigh were most active during the lifting portion of the task (lifting a block from the participant's right) and activity decreased as the block was transferred to the left. Left thigh muscles showed the opposite pattern. EMG activity for the majority of thigh muscles was affected by the size of the base of support provided by different postures, with lower EMG activity observed with a larger base of support and increased activity in postures where base of support was reduced (p < 0.05). Thigh EMG activity was lowest in postures with fully flexed knees, which may explain worker preference for this posture. However, such postures are also associated with increased risk of meniscal damage. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: Kneeling and squatting postures are sometimes used for manual lifting activities, but are associated with increased knee injury risk. This paper examines the EMG responses of knee extensors/flexors to lifting in these postures, discusses the impact of posture and kneepads on muscle recruitment and explores the implications for work in such postures.     

Lifting belts: a psychophysical analysis

The literature supporting the use of lifting belts has not demonstrated consistent trends. It was hypothesized that if lifting belts provide a biomechanical or motivational advantage then the participants in a psychophysical lift test should select a higher maximum acceptable weight of lift (MAWL). Eleven male and five female subjects participated in one session with a lifting belt and one session without a belt. The order of the belt sessions was counterbalanced. Each session was comprised of two psychophysical lifting tests varying only in the initial weight of the box. Repeated measures ANOVA showed no difference between the MAWL between belt sessions or between the two tests within a given session. Following the test, subjective evaluations of the belt were measured via a questionnaire. The psychophysical test results showed no change as a function of the belt condition. Thus, these results do not support the hypothesis that lifting belts increase trunk strength or motivate individuals to select a greater MAWL. Therefore, it must be concluded that belts do not offer a biomechanical or motivational advantage to the user.