Clinical hemodialysis experience with percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas created using the Ellipsys® vascular access system

Introduction: The aim of this study is to report our clinical hemodialysis experience using a percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) created with the Ellipsys® vascular access system. This pAVF device creates a permanent AVF anastomosis between the proximal radial artery (PRA) and the deep communicating vein (DCV) in the proximal forearm. Methods: The medical records of all patients with a pAVF were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical data analyzed included reliability of pAVF use, quality of dialysis, rate and success of puncture, and pAVF related complications, along with incidence of subsequent interventions. Findings: Between May 2017 and November 2018, 34 patients had a pAVF created with technical success in 33 patients (97%). Twenty‐eight out of 34 (82%) patients had successful two‐needle cannulation within 10 days to 6 weeks after pAVF creation. The mean Kt/v was 1.6 (1.2‐2) and the average recirculation was 10%. Fifteen patients (44%) needed no further access intervention. Twelve patients (35%) required an additional procedure to assist maturation of the pAVF in order to facilitate puncture. The average blood flow measured at the brachial artery, before the first cannulation, was 850 ml/min. From causes unrelated to the procedure, four patients died during the follow‐up study. Two patients required revision to a surgical AVF. None of the pAVFs developed aneurysmal degeneration steal syndrome, or high access flow related issues. Discussion: The Ellipsys® pAVF offers a safe and functional vascular access for hemodialysis. Advantages included prompt access maturation, avoidance of high flow AVFs, and a simple nonsurgical procedure with high patient satisfaction. Functional outcomes are equivalent and likely better than surgical fistulas. There appears to be less aneurysmal degeneration and need for future re‐intervention. Objective dialysis parameters indicate excellent quality of hemodialysis for the patient.     

Carotid-jugular arteriovenous fistula: a case report of an iatrogenic complication following internal jugular vein catheterization for hemodialysis access

We report a case of diabetic end-stage renal disease patient who presented with a right common carotid artery jugular arteriovenous fistula as a complication of the insertion of a polyurethane double-lumen hemodialysis catheter into the right internal jugular vein .On physical examination of the neck, a pulsating mass with a palpable thrill and a bruit was noted in the right subclavicular region. The diagnosis was confirmed by color doppler ultrasonography of the neck and carotid angiography. The review of the literature suggests the occurrence of this complication as rather rare. The fistula was successfully repaired surgically. It is emphasized that while securing the access, a thorough physical examination with a special emphasis on seeking any neck swellings, thrill, and bruit along with routine use of vascular doppler for securing dialysis access is recommended.     

Radio‐cephalic fistula recovered with drainage to forearm basilic vein

Dysfunction problems with vascular access are a concern to patients and dialysis units. The vascular surgeon should analyse such dysfunction and perform a careful assessment of the vascular network in order to find new fistula layouts. We introduce and discuss the case of creation of a radio‐cephalic fistula with outflow into the forearm basilic vein through rotation of the forearm basilic vein toward the cephalic vein in the forearm of an 88‐year‐old hemodialysis male patient. This technique enables extending fistula patency and improves cost efficiency.     

The use of vascular access audit and infections in home hemodialysis

Vascular access‐related infection is an important adverse event in home hemodialysis (HHD). We hypothesize that errors in self‐cannulation or manipulation of dialysis vascular access are associated with increased incidence of access‐related infection. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all prevalent HHD patients at the University Health Network. All vascular access‐related infections were recorded from 2006 to 2013. Errors in dialysis access were ascertained by nurse‐administered vascular access checklist. Ninety‐two patients had completed at least one vascular access audit. Median HHD vintage was 2.3 (0.9–5.0) years in patients with appropriate vascular access technique and 5.8 (1.5–9.4) years in patients with erroneous vascular access technique. The overall rate of infection between patients with and without appropriate vascular access technique was similar (0.27 and 0.28 infections per year, P = 0.166). Among patients who were identified with errors in dialysis access manipulation, patients with five or more errors were associated with higher rate of access‐related infection (mean of 0.47 vs. 0.16 infection per patient‐year, P < 0.001). The use of vascular access audit is a feasible strategy, which can identify errors in vascular access technique. Patients with a longer median HHD vintage are associated with higher risk of inappropriate vascular access technique. Patients with multiple errors in vascular access technique are associated with a higher risk of dialysis access‐related infection. Prospective evaluation of the impact of vascular access audit on adverse vascular access events is warranted.     

Our experience in using the brachial venae comitantes as a native vascular access for hemodialysis

A native arteriovenous fistula is the preferred vascular access for patients on long‐term hemodialysis. In the absence of suitable superficial veins, the deep venous system can be used. We intend to present our experience in using the brachial venae comitantes (VC) to create a native arteriovenous fistula. From January 2012 to December 2014, we utilized the brachial vena comitantes to create 12 arteriovenous fistulae. Data from these 12 subjects were analyzed retrospectively to produce this case series. The average age of our subjects was 55.6 years. Forty‐two percent of the subjects were women. Fifty percent of the subjects had diabetes mellitus and 58% had hypertension. We achieved a functional patency rate of 58% at 1 month's follow up after maturation. The brachio–brachial vena comitans fistula is a safe and plausible option in patients with no other suitable veins for a native fistula, more so in the hands of experienced surgeons. The longer time to cannulation has to be taken into consideration when creating a VC fistula. In suitable patients with end‐stage renal disease, it can delay the use of an arteriovenous graft or a tunneled central venous catheter.     

Challenges of long-term vascular access in pediatric hemodialysis: Recommendations for practitioners

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment of end-stage renal disease in children. However, time to transplant varies, making a well-functioning long-term vascular access essential for performing hemodialysis efficiently and without disruption until a kidney becomes available. However, establishing long-term vascular access in pediatric patients can present distinct challenges due to this population's unique characteristics, such as smaller body size and lower-diameter blood vessels. There are three main pediatric long-term vascular access options, which include central venous catheters (CVC), arteriovenous fistula (AVF), and arteriovenous graft (AVG). CVC are currently the most widely used modality, although various studies and guidelines recommend AVF or AVG as the preferred option. Although AVF should be used whenever possible, it is crucial that clinicians consider factors such as patient size, physical exam findings, comorbidities, predicted duration of treatment to decide on the most optimal long-term vascular access modality. This article reviews the three long-term vascular access methods in children and the benefits and complications of each.     

Conservative management of a lymphocele that formed shortly after creation of an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis

Patients with end-stage renal disease require to establish vascular access for regular hemodialysis. The creation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is usually a safe procedure; however, there could be complications such as bleeding, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, thrombosis, infection, and steal syndrome. A rare complication of such vascular manipulation could be formation of lymphocele. We present a case of a 67-year-old man who presented with a progressively enlarging mass 12 days after the surgery for AVF creation at the site of surgery in the right upper arm. Ultrasonographic examination revealed a fluid-filled cystic structure measuring about 4.2 × 3.6 × 1.9 cm under the skin just above the anastomosis. The fluid was aspirated using ultrasound-guided fluoroscopy that relieved the swelling. The analysis of aspirate suggested the cyst to be a lymphocele. The mass re-enlarged to its previous size in the next 3 days. While under observation for signs of complication, regular intermittent compression and a low-fat diet completely resolved the lymphocele over the subsequent 3 months. The less common occurrence of such lymphocele post AVF creation needs to be evaluated for its potential for complication, in the absence of which the lymphocele is amenable to conservative management using regular intermittent compression and low-fat oral diet.     

Effect of needle orientation during arteriovenous access puncture on needed compression time after hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial

Background

There are two techniques for puncturing an arteriovenous fistula: one where the needle is inserted bevel up and then rotated to a bevel down position, and another where the needle is inserted bevel down. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods of needle insertion on minimum compression time required for hemostasis after needle removal.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, cross-over, blinded, single-center, routine care study. Each patient's average post-dialysis puncture site compression time was determined during a 2-week baseline period while using bevel-up access puncture. Subsequently, minimum post-dialysis puncture-site compression time was determined during each of two sequential follow-up periods, during which fistula puncture was done with needles inserted bevel up or down, respectively. The order of treatments (bevel up or bevel down insertion) was randomized. During each follow-up period, the minimum compression time necessary to avoid bleeding on needle removal was determined by progressively shortening the compression time. Puncture-associated pain was also assessed as prepump and venous pressures and ability to achieve desired blood flow rate during the dialysis session.

Results

Forty-two patients were recruited. The baseline compression time after needle removal averaged 9.99 ± 2.7 min During the intervention periods, the minimum compression time was on average 10.8 min (9.23–12.4) when the access needles had been inserted bevel down versus 11.1 min (9.61–12.5) when the access needles had been inserted bevel up (p = 0.72). There was no difference in puncture-associated pain between the two insertion techniques, and no difference in prepump or venous pressures or ability to achieve the desired blood flow rate during the dialysis session.

Conclusion

Bevel-up and bevel-down needle orientation during arteriovenous fistula puncture are equivalent techniques in terms of achieving hemostasis on needle removal, and puncture-associated pain.     

Brachial‐cephalic fistula recovered with drainage for the basilic vein: Case report

Vascular access is essential for the implementation of hemodialysis (HD). The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) can be constructed in various locations using various veins. However, the quality of the veins will influence the construction site, as well as the functioning of the AVF. Careful analysis of the vascular network allows options for the development of new fistulas presentations. We present and discuss the case of a woman aged 69 years in HD in which a brachial‐cephalic fistula with drainage to basilic vein was created, through rotation of the cephalic vein on the forearm level. This kind of access serves to prolong the time spent dialyzing through native fistulae, with their reduced complications and greater cost‐effectiveness.     

Primary brachial vein transposition for hemodialysis access: Report of a case and review of the literature

The superiority of autogenous fistulae in patients with end‐stage renal disease, performing hemodialysis, is well established and largely accepted. However, in case that superficial veins in the upper arm are not available for fistula construction, brachial vein transposition may be a viable alternative prior to graft placement. This transposition could be done as a primary or staged procedure, depending on the vein size. We present the case of a 63‐year‐old male patient with a thrombosed arteriovenous graft in the forearm and a large brachial vein in the ipsilateral upper arm. A one‐stage (primary) brachial vein transposition was performed. The fistula, 10 months after its construction, is still patent. No complications have occurred.     

Cephalic arch stenosis in patients with fistula access for hemodialysis: relationship to diabetes and thrombosis

Numerous studies have identified the fistula as the best access for hemodialysis with fewest complications. The radiocephalic fistula (RCF) is the first access of choice, but often results in poor maturation. Therefore, an increased number of brachiocephalic fistulas (BCF) have been placed. Cephalic arch stenosis (CAS) can occur in patients with fistula access. The current study was done to determine the incidence and associated comorbidities in patients with BCF or RCF who have CAS. A retrospective review of 450 hemodialysis patients in 3 outpatient hemodialysis units between July 1, 2000 and July 1, 2005 (60 months) was preformed. We reviewed demographics, medications, and indications for venograms. Interventional Radiologists reviewed the venograms for evidence of CAS. Radiology reports were screened to determine incidence of thrombosis, treatment with either angioplasty or stent placement and if a complication such as venous rupture occurred. One hundred and twenty-seven patients had fistula access with at least 1 venogram. Of these, 30 were RCF and 97 were BCF. Cephalic arch stenosis occurred in 77% of patients with BCF and in 20% of patients with RCF. Those with diabetes had a lower rate of occurrence than those without (p<0.01). Cephalic arch stenosis led to a high rate of thrombosis (p<0.01). The probability of having multiple radiology procedures was higher with CAS than without (p<0.01). Cephalic arch stenosis is an important problem in hemodialysis patients who have fistula access, and contributes to thrombosis. Diabetes was found to have a negative association with CAS for undefined reasons. Attempts to understand this relationship are important.     

Femoral arteriovenous fistula 3 months after removal of catheter for hemodialysis

A 56‐year‐old Asian woman was admitted to hospital for the consideration of hemodialysis (HD). A right femoral dialysis catheter was inserted for HD. Three months after removal of catheter, she was admitted because of right inguinal swelling. A thrill and bruit were felt and heard at the inguinal area. Color Doppler detected a fistula between right superficial femoral artery and right common femoral vein and subsequently confirmed by contrast enhanced computed tomography scan and 3‐dimensional reconstruction with computed tomography. At surgery, a 4‐mm–diameter fistula was found between the right superficial femoral artery and right common femoral vein. A primary closure of both defects in the artery and vein was then carried out. A follow‐up digital vascular study 3 months after surgical repair was normal. In conclusion, nephrologist should have a heightened awareness to the potential of this complication and should at least document a normal exam following the removal of femoral catheters.     

Vascular access for hemodialysis: experience of a team of nephrologists

A survey conducted by Bonucchi et al. underlined the different types of doctors placing arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis in the United States and Europe (in particular Italy). In fact, nephrologists definitely prevail in Italy, where almost 48.8% of nephrologists place an AVF themselves or with the help of a vascular surgeon (26.4%). In Europe, only 35% do so, whereas 89% of AVF are performed by surgeons in the United States. In 98% of the cases occurring at our center, the AVF was placed and reviewed by the nephrologists. This paper reports surgery cases related to the period between January 1983 and September 2006. Over this time, 1386 operations for placing and reviewing vascular access were conducted. Among these, 47 (3.3%) were related to a cuffed central venous catheter (CVC); 1138 (80.2%) related to a distal AVF; 201 (10.6%) related to a proximal AVF; and 51 (3.6%) related to an arteriovenous graft (AVG). In addition, 33 (2.3%) operations performed before January 1983 relating to AV Scribner shunts were included. Arteriovenous fistulas or AVGs were provided to our patients (only 2.6% of them have a CVC), and AVF rescue operations were performed in the shortest possible time with advantages for the patient and his vascular access.     

Geographic disparities in arteriovenous fistula placement in patients approaching hemodialysis in the United States

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis (HD). Several factors associated with AVF placement have been identified (e.g., age, sex, race, comorbidities). We hypothesized that geographic location of patient residence might be associated with the probability of AVF placement as the initial access. We used the data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database (2005–2008) linked to Medicare claims (2003–2008). Logistic regression was used to estimate specific characteristics of population associated with the AVF as first access placed or attempted for HD initiation. Our primary variable of interest was the geographic location, and the multivariate model was adjusted for age, sex, race, body mass index, primary cause of end‐stage renal disease (ESRD), duration of pre‐ESRD nephrology care, comorbidities, employment status, substance abuse, and income. Geographic location was determined using the data collected by the RUCA project and divided population into metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural categories. Patients (n = 111,953) identified from the USRDS database with linked Medicare claims were examined. Rates of fistula placement in the metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural population were 18.5%, 22.4%, and 21.6%, respectively. In comparison, patients who received catheter as the first access were 81.5%, 77.6% and 78.4%, respectively. The odds ratio of AVF placement as a first HD access in the rural and metropolitan population compared with the micropolitan population were 0.96 (0.90–1.03; P = 0.26) and 0.80 (0.76–0.84; P < 0.001), respectively. Our results indicate the presence of geographic disparities in AVF placement with decreased rates of AVF as the first access created in the metropolitan (but not rural) populations compared with the micropolitan communities.     

Anatomical factors associated with left innominate vein stenosis in hemodialysis patients

Central venous stenosis remains a challenge in hemodialysis patients. Venograms have shown that left innominate vein (LIV) stenosis often occurs in front of the trachea, where it crosses the aortic arch, suggesting that there may be an anatomical factor involved, such as iliac vein compression syndrome. The goal of this study was to determine whether LIV stenosis can be attributed to compression. From September 2008 to December 2011, 19 hemodialysis patients (ten women, nine men) with symptomatic venous hypertension of the upper‐left extremity were enrolled in this study. Venography and multidetector computed tomography were used to determine the location of the venous stenosis and to assess LIV anatomy. LIV diameter and the space between the sternum and aortic arch were compared between the LIV stenosis (LIVS) group (n = 9) and the non‐LIV‐stenosis (NLIVS) group (n = 10). The mean age of the cohort was 63 ± 17.3 years. The mean LIV diameter was 1.69 ± 1.55 mm in the LIVS group and 8.71 ± 2.33 mm in the NLIVS group. The space between the aortic arch and sternum was smaller in the LIVS group (4.55 ± 2.67 mm) than in the NLIVS group (15.25 ± 6.12 mm, P < 0.001). A contributing factor to LIV stenosis may be due to anatomical compression of the aortic arch behind the sternum. Preoperative noncontrast computed tomography is recommended for hemodialysis patients to exclude extrinsic compression.