Compositional model-theoretic semantics for logic programs

We present a compositional model-theoretic semantics for logic programs, where the composition of programs is modelled by the composition of the admissible Herbrand models of the programs. An Herbrand model is admissible if it is supported by the assumption of a set of hypotheses. On one hand, the hypotheses supporting a model correspond to an open interpretation of the program intended to capture possible compositions with other programs. On the other hand, admissible models provide a natural model-theory for a form of hypothetical reasoning, called abduction. The application of admissibel models to programs with negation is discussed. Antonio Brogi: Dipartimento di Informatica, Università di Pisa, Corso Italia 40, 56125 Pisa, ItalyResearch interests: Programming Language Design and Semantics, Logic Programming and Artificial Intelligence     

N-Prolog and equivalence of logic programs

The aim of this work is to develop a declarative semantics for N-Prolog with negation as failure. N-Prolog is an extension of Prolog proposed by Gabbay and Reyle (1984, 1985), which allows for occurrences of nested implications in both goals and clauses. Our starting point is an operational semantics of the language defined by means of top-down derivation trees. Negation as finite failure can be naturally introduced in this context. A goal-G may be inferred from a database if every top-down derivation of G from the database finitely fails, i.e., contains a failure node at finite height.Our purpose is to give a logical interpretation of the underlying operational semantics. In the present work (Part 1) we take into consideration only the basic problems of determining such an interpretation, so that our analysis will concentrate on the propositional case. Nevertheless we give an intuitive account of how to extend our results to a first order language. A full treatment of N-Prolog with quantifiers will be deferred to the second part of this work.Our main contribution to the logical understanding of N-Prolog is the development of a notion of modal completion for programs, or databases. N-Prolog deductions turn out to be sound and complete with respect to such completions. More exactly, we introduce a natural modal three-valued logic PK and we prove that a goal is derivable from a propositional program if and only if it is implied by the completion of the program in the logic PK. This result holds for arbitrary programs. We assume no syntactic restriction, such as stratification (Apt et al. 1988; Bonner and McCarty 1990). In particular, we allow for arbitrary recursion through negation.Our semantical analysis heavily relies on a notion of intensional equivalence for programs and goals. This notion is naturally induced by the operational semantics, and is preserved under substitution of equivalent subexpressions. Basing on this substitution property we develop a theory of normal forms of programs and goals. Every program can be effectively transformed into an equivalent program in normal form. From the simple and uniform structure of programs in normal form one may directly define the completion.     

Grammar-related transformations of logic programs

We investigate a simple transformation of logic programs capable of inverting the order of computation. Several examples are given which illustrate how this transformation may serve such purposes as left-recursion elimination, loop-elimination, simulation of forward reasoning, isotopic modification of programs and simulation of abductive reasoning.     

Verifying local stratifiability of logic programs and databases

In this paper, we deal with the problem of verifying local stratifiability of logic programs and databases presented by Przymusinski. The notion of dependency graphs is generalized from representing the priority relation between predicate symbols to representing the priority between atoms. Necessary and sufficient conditions for the local stratifiability of logic programs are presented and algorithms for performing the verification are developed. Finally, we prove that a database DB containing clauses with disjunctive consequents can easily be converted into a logic program P such that DB is locally stratified iff P is locally stratified. Yi-Dong Shen, Dr.: Department of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 630044, P.R. China (Present Address) c/o Ping Ran, Department of Heat Power Engineering, Chongqing UniversityResearch interests: Artificial Intelligence, Deductive Databases, Logic Programming, Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Parallel Processing     

Well-founded semantics and stratification for ordered logic programs

This paper present an extension of traditional logic programming, called ordered logic (OL) programming, to support classical negation as well as constructs from the object-oriented paradigm. In particular, such an extension allows to cope with the notions of object, multiple inheritance and non-monotonic reasoning. The contribution of the work is mainly twofold. First, a rich wellfounded semantics for ordered logic programs is defined. Second, an efficient method for the well-founded model computation of a meaningful class of ordered logic programs, called stratified programs, is provided.     

On the complexity of some inductive logic programming problems

The bounded ILP-consistency problem for function-free Horn clauses is described as follows. Given at setE ⁺ andE ^? of function-free ground Horn clauses and an integerk polynomial inE ⁺∪E ^?, does there exist a function-free Horn clauseC with no more thank literals such thatC subsumes each element inE ⁺ andC does not subsume any element inE ^?? It is shown that this problem is Σ ₂ ^P complete. We derive some related results on the complexity of ILP and discuss the usefulness of such complexity results.     

Analyzing Security Scenarios Using Defence Trees and Answer Set Programming

Defence trees are used to represent attack and defence strategies in security scenarios; the aim in such scenarios is to select the best set of countermeasures that are able to stop all the vulnerabilities.In order to represent preferences among possible countermeasures of a given attack, defence trees are enriched with conditional preferences, obtaining a new structure called CP-defence tree. In this paper we transform a CP-defence tree with preferences among attacks and countermeasures in an Answer Set Optimization (ASO) program. The ASO program, representing the overall scenario, is a special composition of the programs associated to each branch of a CP-defence tree. We describe an implementation that select the best set of countermeasure able to mitigate all the vulnerabilities by computing the optimal answer set of the corresponding ASO program.     

An extended variant of atoms loop check for positive logic programs

The Equality check and the Subsumption check are weakly sound, but are not complete even for function-free logic programs. Although the OverSize (OS) check is complete for positive logic programs, it is too general in the sense that it prunes SLD-derivations merely based on the depth-bound of repeated predicate symbols and the size of atoms, regardless of the inner structure of the atoms, so it may make wrong conclusions even for some simple programs. In this paper, we explore complete loop checking mechanisms for positive logic programs. We develop an extended Variant of Atoms (VA) check that has the following features: (1) it generalizes the concept of “variant” from “the same up to variable renaming” to “the same up to variable renaming except possibly with some arguments whose size recursively increases”, (2) it makes use of the depth-bound of repeated variants of atoms instead of depth-bound of repeated predicate symbols, (3) it combines the Equality/Subsumption check with the VA check, (4) it is complete w. r. t. the leftmost selection rule for positive logic programs, and (5) it is more sound than both the OS check and all the existing versions of the VA check. The research was completed when the author visited the University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies. Yi-Dong Shen, Ph. D: He is a professor of Computer Science at Chongqing University, China. He received the Ph. D degree in computer Science from Chongqing University in 1991. He was a visiting researcher at the University of Valenciennes, France (1992–1993) and the University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies (UMIACS), U. S. A. (1995–1996), respectively. His present interests include: Artificial Intelligence, Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases, Logic Programming and Parallel Processing.     

On computing logic programs

In this paper we present and compare some classical problem-solving methods for computing the stable models of logic programs with negation. Using a graph theoretic representation of logic programs and their stable models, we discuss and compare linear programming, propositional satisfiability, constraint satisfaction, and graph methods.     

On the equivalence of semantics for normal logic programs

Despite the frequent comment that there is no general agreement on the semantics of logic programs, this paper shows that a number of independently proposed extensions to the stable model semantics coincide: the regular model semantics proposed by You and Yuan, the partial stable model semantics by Saccà and Zaniolo, the preferential semantics by Dung, and a stronger version of the stable class semantics by Baral and Subrahmanian. We show that these equivalent semantics can be characterized simply as selecting a particular kind of stable classes, called normal alternating fixpoints. In addition, we indicate that almost all of the previously proposed semantic frameworks coincide with that of normal alternating fixpoints. Due to its simplicity and naturalness, the framework of normal alternating fixpoints offers great potential in the study of the semantics for various nonmonotonic systems.     

析取回答集程序设计结构化测试方法

针对析取回答集程序的结构化测试基础理论匮乏的问题,系统化地提出析取回答集程序结构化测试覆盖的概念。首先,定义针对析取回答集程序的测试用例,确立析取回答集程序的主要测试实体为程序中的逻辑规则;其次,通过对规则的头、规则的体、规则的集合等不同测试目标构建了规则覆盖、定义覆盖、环覆盖等基本概念来模拟结构化测试中的语句覆盖、分支覆盖等概念;最后,提出了析取回答集程序的测试覆盖率计算公式,并举例说明各种覆盖下的覆盖率计算方法,并讨论了析取回答集程序的部分特殊性质和关键指标。     

Constructive negation and constraint logic programming with sets

The aim of this paper is to extend theConstructive Negation technique to the case ofCLP(SεT), a Constraint Logic Programming (CLP) language based on hereditarily (and hybrid) finite sets. The challenging aspects of the problem originate from the fact that the structure on whichCLP(SεT) is based is notadmissible closed, and this does not allow to reuse the results presented in the literature concerning the relationships betweenCLP and constructive negation. We propose a new constraint satisfaction algorithm, capable of correctly handling constructive negation for large classes ofCLP(SεT) programs; we also provide a syntactic characterization of such classes of programs. The resulting algorithm provides a novel constraint simplification procedure to handle constructive negation, suitable to theories where unification admits multiple most general unifiers. We also show, using a general result, that it is impossible to construct an interpreter forCLP(SεT) with constructive negation which is guaranteed to work for any arbitrary program; we identify classes of programs for which the implementation of the constructive negation technique is feasible. Agostino Dovier, Ph.D.: He is a researcher in the Department of Science and Technology at the University of Verona, Italy. He obtained his master degree in Computer Science from the University of Udine, Italy, in 1991 and his Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Pisa, Italy, in 1996. His research interests are in Programming Languages and Constraints over complex domains, such as Sets and Multisets. He has published over 20 research papers in International Journals and Conferences. He is teaching a course entitled “Special Languages and Techniques for Programming” at the University of Verona. Enrico Pontelli, Ph.D.: He is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science at the New Mexico State University. He obtained his Laurea degree from the University of Udine (Italy) in 1991, his Master degree from the University of Houston in 1992, and his Ph.D. degree from New Mexico State University in 1997. His research interests are in Programming Languages, Parallel Processing, and Constraint Programming. He has published over 50 papers and served on the program committees of different conferences. He is presently the Associate Director of the Laboratory for Logic, Databases, and Advanced Programming. Gianfranco Rossi, Ph.D.: He received his degree in Computer Science from the University of Pisa in 1979. From 1981 to 1983 he was employed at Intecs Co. System House in Pisa. From November 1983 to February 1989 he was a researcher at the Dipartimento di Informatica of the University of Turin. Since March 1989 he is an Associate Professor of Computer Science, currently with the University of Parma. He is the author of several papers dealing mainly with programming languages, in particular logic programming languages and Prolog, and extended unification algorithms. His current research interests are (logic) programming languages with sets and set unification algorithms.     

On Local Stratifiability of Logic Prograns and Databases

In this paper,we deal with the problem of verifying local stratifiability of logic programs and databases presented by Przymusinski.Necessary and sufficient condition for the local stratifiability of logic programs are presented and algorithms of performing the verification are developed.Finally,we prove that a database D B containing clauses with disjunctive consequents can be easily converted into a logic program P such that D B is locally statified iff P is locally stratified.     

Performance of an OR-parallel logic programming system

The research focus in parallel logic programming is shifting rapidly from theoretical considerations and simulation on uniprocessors to implementation on true multiprocessors. This report presents performance figures from such a system,Boplog, for OR-parallel Horn clause logic programs on the BBN Butterfly Parallel Processor. Boplog is designed expressly for a large scale shared memory multiprocessor with an Omega interconnect. The target machine and underlying execution model are described briefly. The primary focus of the paper is on detailed statistics taken from the execution of benchmark programs to assess the performance of the model and clarify the impact of design and architecture decisions. They show that while speedup of this implementation on highly OR-parallel problems is very good, overall performance is poor. Despite its speed drawback, many aspcts of the implementation and its performance can prove useful in designing future systems for similar machines. A binding model that prohibits constant time access to bindings, and the inability of the machine to support an ambitious use of machine memory appear to be most damaging factors.This work was carried out at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. It was supported by a University of Utah Graduate Research Fellowship, the National Science Foundation under Grant DCR-856000, and by an unrestricted gift from L. M. Ericsson Telefon AB, Stockholm, Sweden, Production of the document was supported by the Rockwell International Science Center.     

Proving termination of GHC programs

A transformational approach for proving termination of parallel logic programs such as GHC programs is proposed. A transformation from GHC programs to term rewriting systems is developed; it exploits the fact that unifications in GHC-resolution correspond to matchings. The termination of a GHC program for a class of queries is implied by the termination of the resulting rewrite system. This approach facilitates the applicability of a wide range of termination techniques developed for rewrite systems in proving termination of GHC programs. The method consists of three steps: (a) deriving moding information from a given GHC program, (b) transforming the GHC program into a term rewriting system using the moding information, and finally (c) proving termination of the resulting rewrite system. Using this method, the termination of many benchmark GHC programs such as quick-sort, merge-sort, merge, split, fair-split and append, etc., can be proved. This is a revised and extended version of Ref. 12). The work was partially supported by the NSF Indo-US grant INT-9416687 Kapur was partially supported by NSF Grant nos. CCR-8906678 and INT-9014074. M. R. K. Krishna Rao, Ph.D.: He currently works as a senior research fellow at Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. His current interests are in the areas of logic programming, modular aspects and noncopying implementations of term rewriting, learning logic programs from examples and conuterexamples and dynamics of mental states in rational agent architectures. He received his Ph.D in computer science from Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Bombay in 1993 and worked at TIFR and Max Planck Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken until January 1997. Deepak Kapur, Ph.D.: He currently works as a professor at the State University of New York at Albany. His research interests are in the areas of automated reasoning, term rewriting, constraint solving, algebraic and geometric reasoning and its applications in computer vision, symbolic computation, formal methods, specification and verification. He obtained his Ph.D. in Computer Science from MIT in 1980. He worked at General Electric Corporate Research and Development until 1987. Prof. Kapur is the editor-in-chief of the Journal of Automated Reasoning. He also serves on the editorial boards of Journal of Logic Programming, Journal on Constraints, and Journal of Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computer Science. R. K. Shyamasundar, Ph.D.: He currently works as a professor at Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Bombay. His current intersts are in the areas of logic programming, reactive and real time programming, constraint solving, formal methods, specification and verification. He received his Ph.D in computer science from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore in 1975 and has been a faculty member at Tata Institute of Fundamental Research since then. He has been a visiting/regular faculty member at Technological University of Eindhoven, University of Utrecht, IBM TJ Watson Research Centre, Pennsylvania State University, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, INRIA and ENSMP, France. He has served on (and chaired) Program Committees of many International Conferences and has been on the Editorial Committees.     

On the monotonicity of (LDL) logic programs with set

LDL is one of the recently proposed logical query languages, which incorporate set, for data and knowledge base systems. Since LDL programs can simulate negation, they are not monotonic in general. On the other hand, there are monotonic LDL programs. This paper addresses the natural question of “When are the generally nonmonotonic LDL programs monotonic?” and investigates related topics such as useful applications for monotonicity. We discuss four kinds of monotonicity, and examine two of them in depth. The first of the two, called “ω-monotonicity”, is shown to be undecidable even when limited to single-stratum programs. The second, called “uniform monotonicity”, is shown to implyω-monotonicity. We characterize the uniform monotonicity of a program (i) by a relationship between its Bancilhon-Khoshafian semantics and its LDL semantics, and (ii) with a useful property called subset completion independence. Characterization (ii) implies that uniformly monotonie programs can be evaluated more efficiently by discarding dominated facts. Finally, we provide some necessary and/or sufficient, syntactic conditions for uniform monotonicity. The conditions pinpoint (a) enumerated set terms, (b) negations of membership and inclusion, and (c) sharing of set terms as the main source for nonuniform monotonicity.     

Complex-shaped beam element and graph-based optimization of compliant mechanisms

Compliant mechanisms are designed to be intentionally flexible, providing hingeless mechanisms. This work contributes a complex-shaped beam element formulation in conjunction with the ground structure approach. We identify compliant mechanism design solutions by using evolutionary topology optimization and increase flexibility by using a parametrization concept based on graph theory. The new operators for evolutionary optimization are also explained and sample problems are used to address the question of how our contribution increases design solutions space.