共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
分布式互斥是分布式系统的重要问题.根据树拓扑网络的特点,提出了新型的分布式互斥算法TNDME.算法的运行范围限制在根节点到请求节点之间,采用循径方法生成分布式互斥仲裁集;采用Lamport逻辑时戳保证消息的时序性;算法采用"最大残存树"探测方法进行系统的容错处理.描述了算法的模型、主要思想、数据结构、消息结构以及伪代码,并证明了算法的正确性.理论性能分析与仿真对比证明,算法具有较低的消息复杂度、较短的响应延迟以及较好的容错性能. 相似文献
5.
6.
分布式互斥是网格分布式系统的重要问题.根据网格系统的特点,提出了新型的分布式互斥算法.该算法基于网格网络的行列生成分布式互斥十字仲裁集;采用Lamport逻辑时戳保证消息的时序性;算法采用"探测"消息进行系统的容错处理.分析与仿真证明,该算法具有较低的消息复杂度、较短的响应延迟以及较好的容错性能. 相似文献
7.
分布式互斥是网格分布式系统的重要问题。根据网格系统的特点,提出了新型的分布式互斥算法。该算法基于网格网络的直径生成分布式互斥仲裁集;采用Lamport逻辑时戳保证消息的时序性;算法采用“探测”消息进行系统的容错处理。分析与仿真证明,该算法具有较低的消息复杂度、较短的响应延迟以及较好的容错性能。 相似文献
8.
分布式互斥是环网分布式系统的重要问题.根据此类系统的特点,提出了新型的分布式互斥算法.该算法以请求者自身为中心,基于半环生成分布式互斥仲裁集;采用Lamport逻辑时戳保证消息的时序性;算法采用"探测"消息进行系统的容错处理.分析与仿真证明,该算法具有较低的消息复杂度、较短的响应延迟以及较好的容错性能. 相似文献
9.
在大规模完全分布式系统的互斥问题上,快速生成请求集是必要的。在基于松弛差集的相关原理上,引入了二次松弛差集的概念。经分析相关概念及定理,将原本“求差”的过程变为“求和”的过程;进而利用 “求和”步骤间的递推关系,大大减少了求和步骤,使整个算法的时间复杂度控制在O(n)。与时间复杂度同为O(n^2)的其他经典算法相比,生成的请求集长度仍保持在2n^(1/2)的数量级。 相似文献
10.
11.
Kakugawa H. Kamei S. Masuzawa T. 《Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on》2008,19(9):1153-1166
The group mutual exclusion problem is a generalization of mutual exclusion problem such that a set of processes in the same group can enter critical section simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a distributed algorithm for the group mutual exclusion problem in asynchronous message passing distributed systems. Our algorithm is based on tokens, and a process that obtains a token can enter critical section. For reducing message complexity, it uses coterie as a communication structure when a process sends a request messages. Informally, coterie is a set of quorums, each of which is a subset of the process set, and any two quorums share at least one process. The message complexity of our algorithm is $O(|Q|)$ in the worst case, where $|Q|$ is a quorum size that the algorithm adopts. Performance of the proposed algorithm is presented by analysis and discrete event simulation. Especially, the proposed algorithm achieves high concurrency, which is a performance measure for the number of processes that can be in critical section simultaneously. 相似文献
12.
Ranganath Atreya Neeraj Mittal Sathya Peri 《Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on》2007,18(10):1345-1360
The group mutual exclusion problem extends the traditional mutual exclusion problem by associating a type (or a group) with each critical section. In this problem, processes requesting critical sections of the same type can execute their critical sections concurrently. However, processes requesting critical sections of different types must execute their critical sections in a mutually exclusive manner. We present a distributed algorithm for solving the group mutual exclusion problem based on the notion of surrogate-quorum. Intuitively, our algorithm uses the quorum that has been successfully locked by a request as a surrogate to service other compatible requests for the same type of critical section. Unlike the existing quorum-based algorithms for group mutual exclusion, our algorithm achieves a low message complexity of O(q) and a low (amortized) bit-message complexity of O(bqr), where q is the maximum size of a quorum, b is the maximum number of processes from which a node can receive critical section requests, and r is the maximum size of a request while maintaining both synchronization delay and waiting time at two message hops. As opposed to some existing quorum-based algorithms, our algorithm can adapt without performance penalties to dynamic changes in the set of groups. Our simulation results indicate that our algorithm outperforms the existing quorum-based algorithms for group mutual exclusion by as much as 45 percent in some cases. We also discuss how our algorithm can be extended to satisfy certain desirable properties such as concurrent entry and unnecessary blocking freedom. 相似文献
13.
自适应Ad hoc分布式互斥算法 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Ad hoc网络的动态拓扑结构和节点自组织给分布式算法的实现带来了诸多困难.针对Ad hoc分布式互斥算法研究滞后的现状,提出了一种自适应的Ad hoc分布式算法ADMUTEX. ADMUTEX算法基于令牌查询方法,它采用Lamport逻辑时戳保证消息的时序性,避免了节点饿死.同时,它在消息复杂度与同步延迟之间作了折衷,而且它不需要节点了解系统的全局信息,能够适应Ad hoc网络的动态拓扑结构和节点频繁出入的情况.分析与仿真结果表明该算法具有较低的消息复杂度、小响应延迟和公平性. 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
We present a simple and efficient mutual exclusion algorithm whose optimal message passing complexity isO(N), whereNis the number of processors in the network. The message complexity is measured by counting the number of communication hops in a network for a given topology. This algorithm reduces its message passing complexity by a token-chasing method, and enhances its effectiveness by dynamically adjusting state information stored in each processor. Moreover, this algorithm shortens the request delay by fully taking advantage of the network dynamic status information. The performance of the algorithm is also modeled for analytical evaluation. We have conducted a group of experiments on a network of workstations for comparisons between our algorithm and two other existing mutual exclusion algorithms. The experimental results show the effectiveness of our algorithm, especially when a large number of requests access the critical region in a distributed system. Finally, the token-chasing algorithm is further enhanced for fault tolerance under message loss and link crash conditions. 相似文献
17.
Sukhendu Kanrar Samiran Chattopadhyay Nabendu Chaki 《Journal of Network and Systems Management》2013,21(1):1-24
This paper aims towards designing a new token-based mutual exclusion algorithm for distributed systems. In some of the earlier work, token based algorithms for mutual exclusion are proposed for the distributed environment assuming inverted tree topology. In a wireless setup, such a stable, hierarchical topology is quite unrealistic due to frequent link failures. The proposed token-based algorithm works for processes with assigned priorities on any directed graph topology with or without cycles. The proposed algorithm, in spite of considering priorities of processes, ensures liveness in terms of token requests from low priority processes. Moreover, the algorithm keeps control message traffic reasonably low. The simulation results exhibit the performance of the proposed algorithm under varied contexts besides presenting a comparative performance with other recent algorithms for mutual exclusion like FAPP (Fairness Algorithm for Priority Process). 相似文献