Randomised controlled trial of single-dose azithromycin in treatment of trachoma

Blindness due to trachoma is a serious public health issue world wide. The currently recommended treatment of active trachoma with repeated doses of tetracycline eye ointment has many disadvantages. The new azalide antibiotic azithromycin is effective as a single oral dose in the chemotherapy of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections, and we have assessed its efficacy for trachoma treatment. We carried out a randomised single-blind comparison of azithromycin (a single oral dose of 20 mg/kg) with conventional treatment (6 weeks of topical tetracycline plus erythromycin for severe cases) in two villages with endemic trachoma in The Gambia. The patients were followed up for 26 weeks from the start of treatment by an observer unaware of treatment allocation. By 6 months' follow-up, trachoma had resolved in 76 (78%) of 97 subjects who received azithromycin compared with 70 (72%) of 97 who were treated conventionally (95% CI for difference -6% to 18%). Compliance with both treatments was good, but that for conventional treatment could probably not be achieved outside the research setting. There were no significant differences in treatment effect, baseline characteristics, or re-emergent disease between the treatment groups. Azithromycin was well tolerated. As a systemic treatment effective in a single dose it has important potential for trachoma control.     

Ofloxacin. A reappraisal of its use in the management of genitourinary tract infections

Ofloxacin is an established fluoroquinolone agent which achieves good concentrations in genitourinary tract tissues and fluids. It has good in vitro activity against most Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis and Haemophilus ducreyi, intermediate activity against Ureaplasma urealyticum and most enterococci, but limited or no in vitro activity against enterococci, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and many anaerobes. However, high concentrations achieved in the urine ensure its activity against most urinary tract pathogens. Ofloxacin demonstrates consistent efficacy in a broad range of urinary tract infections, achieving bacteriological response rates in excess of 80% in uncomplicated and 70% in complicated infections. The efficacy of ofloxacin was similar to that of all comparators tested including other fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins and cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole). Ofloxacin is also effective as a single-dose regimen in the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea, as a 7-day regimen in uncomplicated C. trachomatis infections, and as monotherapy in uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Again, ofloxacin demonstrated similar efficacy to alternative treatments in each type of infection. The availability of an intravenous formulation and near-complete oral bioavailability allow ofloxacin to be administered as a sequential regimen without loss of activity. The tolerability and drug interaction profile of ofloxacin is consistent with that of other fluoroquinolones. The most commonly reported adverse events with ofloxacin are gastrointestinal, neurological and dermatological. It was associated with a lower incidence of photosensitivity and tendinitis and higher incidence of some neurological events than some other fluoroquinolones. Ofloxacin seems to have a lower propensity to interact with xanthines than other fluoroquinolones. Conclusion: ofloxacin has established efficacy in the treatment of a wide variety of urinary tract infections, although, like other fluoroquinolones, it should be used rationally to preserve its activity. Currently, ofloxacin also holds an important place among fluoroquinolones in the treatment of C. trachomatis infections and uncomplicated PID, although its acceptance as monotherapy in PID is likely to depend on clarification of the causative role of anaerobic pathogens in this infection.     

The treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis with single dose oral azithromycin

In an uncontrolled study, the efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of non-gonococcal urethritis was assessed in 41 male patients aged between 20 and 40 years with a mean age of 27 +/- 5 years. Clinical and microbiological diagnosis confirmed that 28 men were found positive for Chlamydia trachomatis, 10 for Ureaplasma urealyticum and three for both C. trachomatis and U. urealyticum. All patients received 1 g azithromycin orally (four 250 mg capsules). The length of time between the treatment and following visits were 7-10 days and 14-21 days for second and third visits, respectively. Complete eradication was achieved in 27 out of 41 patients. Of the remaining 14, six were found positive for C. trachomatis and were excluded as they did not return for the follow-up visit, one patient did not achieve complete eradication, one patient infected with both C. trachomatis and U. urealyticum failed to achieve complete eradication, and six patients infected with U. urealyticum failed to be completely cured. No adverse effects were reported in any patient. Single dose administration of 1 g azithromycin appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for chlamydial urethritis and an advantage in terms of patient compliance.     

Characteristics of murine model of genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis and effects of therapy with tetracyclines, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, or azithromycin

Following intravaginal inoculation of progesterone-treated outbred mice with Chlamydia trachomatis MoPn, 4 to 6 log10 inclusion-forming units were recovered in vaginal swabs for 21 days but all animals were culture negative after 28 days. Serum antibody titers were elevated and remained high for at least 70 days. Between 28 and 70 days, upper tract infection (inflammation and distension of the uterine horns, occlusion of oviducts with inflammatory exudate, pyosalpinx, and hydrosalpinx) was seen in > 80% of the animals. Mice were dosed orally, commencing at 7 days after infection, with minocycline, doxycycline, or amoxicillin-clavulanate. Further groups received azithromycin either as a single high dose or as lower once-daily doses. In addition, minocycline and amoxicillin-clavulanate were administered at 24 h after infection, and this early treatment prevented elevation of antibody titers whereas delayed therapy did not. Vaginal swabs from mice in all treatment regimens were culture negative except for 25% of mice receiving either early amoxicillin-clavulanate or low-dose azithromycin, which yielded low numbers (20 to 70 inclusion-forming units) of chlamydiae. Numbers of fertile mice in the early treatment regimens and their litter sizes were similar to those of noninfected controls, although 25% of amoxicillin-clavulanate-treated mice had unilateral hydrosalpinges. In comparison, 88% of untreated mice developed hydrosalpinges and only 25% conceived. Delayed dosing did not affect the outcome of amoxicillin-clavulanate therapy but did diminish the protective efficacy of minocycline such that 50% of treated mice had either unilateral hydrosalpinges or ovarian abscesses. Doxycycline and azithromycin were highly effective in restoring fertility. This model makes possible the study of both short- and long-term outcomes of chlamydial infection.     

A comparison of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of sinusitis in adults

The efficacy, tolerability and safety of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of non-severe acute maxillary/ethmoidal sinusitis were compared in a randomized, open clinical trial in 254 adult patients. The predominant pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae (83 patients). Azithromycin was administered orally to 165 patients at a single daily dose of 500 mg for 3 days, and co-amoxiclav (4:1) to 89 patients, at a dose of 500 mg three times daily for 10 days. The overall clinical response rates were 87.5% for azithromycin and 83.7% for co-amoxiclav at follow-up (day 21-28). Microbiological responses to both drugs were good, with only five patients in each group having a persistent infection after treatment. Both drugs were well tolerated and produced similar incidences of adverse events, which were mostly gastrointestinal. Azithromycin was as effective, and as well tolerated as co-amoxiclav, and its shorter simpler dosing regime may offer advantages in compliance and cost.     

Azithromycin. A review of its use in paediatric infectious diseases

Azithromycin is an azalide antimicrobial agent active in vitro against major pathogens responsible for infections of the respiratory tract, skin and soft tissues in children. Pathogens that are generally susceptible to azithromycin include Haemophilus influenzae (including ampicillin-resistant strains), Moraxella catarrhalis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella spp., Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae. Azithromycin is also generally active against erythromycin- and penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Azithromycin is administered once daily, achieves clinically relevant concentrations at sites of infection, is slowly eliminated from the body and has few drug interactions. In children, azithromycin is usually given as either a 3-day course of 10 mg/kg/day or a 5-day course with 10 mg/kg on the first day, followed by 5 mg/kg/day for a further 4 days. These standard regimens were as effective as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, clarithromycin, cefaclor and amoxicillin in the treatment of children with otitis media. Azithromycin was also as effective as either phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V), erythromycin, clarithromycin or cefaclor against streptococcal pharyngitis or tonsillitis in children, but appears to result in more recurrence of infection than phenoxymethylpenicillin in this indication, necessitating a dosage of 12 mg/kg/day for 5 days. Community-acquired pneumonia, bronchitis and other respiratory tract infections in children responded as well to azithromycin as to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefaclor, erythromycin or josamycin. Azithromycin was similar or superior to ceftibuten in mixed general practice populations of patients. However, symptoms of lower respiratory tract infections resolved more rapidly with azithromycin than with erythromycin, josamycin or cefaclor. Skin and soft tissue infections responded as well to azithromycin as to cefaclor, dicloxacillin or flucloxacillin, and oral azithromycin was as effective as ocular tetracycline in treating trachoma. Although not as well tolerated as phenoxymethylpenicillin in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis, azithromycin is at least as well tolerated as most other agents used to treat respiratory tract and other infections in children and was better tolerated than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Adverse events that do occur are mostly gastrointestinal and tend to be mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin is an effective and well tolerated alternative to first-line agents in the treatment of respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue infections in children, offerring the convenience of a short, once-daily regimen.     

An economic evaluation of patch testing in the diagnosis and management of allergic contact dermatitis

AIM: To investigate the value of RNA detection by nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA) for the monitoring of Chlamydia trachomatis infections after antibiotic treatment. METHODS: Cervical smears (n = 97) and urine specimens (n = 61) from 25 C trachomatis positive female patients were analysed for the presence of C trachomatis 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) by NASBA and C trachomatis plasmid DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) before and up to five weeks after antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: Chlamydia trachomatis RNA was found in all cervical smears taken before antibiotic treatment (n = 24) and in two smears taken one week after antibiotic treatment; no C trachomatis RNA was detected after two weeks or more. In contrast, C trachomatis DNA was found in all such specimens before treatment, and 21 of 25, six of 21, and five of 20 smears were found to be positive at one, two, and three weeks after treatment, respectively. After four weeks, only one of six smears was positive, and this smear had been negative in the two preceding weeks. Of the 61 urine samples investigated, C trachomatis DNA and C trachomatis RNA were found in all before treatment (n = 15), whereas one week after treatment four of 15 were C trachomatis DNA positive and C trachomatis RNA was detected in one sample only. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that RNA detection by NASBA can be used successfully to monitor C trachomatis infections after antibiotic treatment. Furthermore, it might be possible to use urine specimens as a test of cure because neither C. trachomatis DNA or RNA could be detected two weeks or more after treatment.     

Repair of spondylolysis in young fast bowlers

Azithromycin, rifabutin, and rifapentine were used to treat or prevent disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infections produced in rats immunosuppressed with cyclosporine. Animals with bacteremic infections were treated 1 week after intravenous inoculation with 10(7) CFU of MAC with azithromycin, 100 mg/kg of body weight administered subcutaneously for 5 days and then 75 mg/kg on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, or with rifabutin or rifapentine, 20 mg/kg administered intraperitoneally on Monday through Friday. All three drugs showed efficacy after 1 and 2 months. Rifabutin cleared the organisms from tissues more rapidly than azithromycin or rifapentine. To approximate prophylaxis, treatment was started 2 weeks before intravenous inoculation with 10(4) organisms. MAC infections were undetectable in treated animals after 4 months, while control animals had disseminated infections. These findings support the rationale for clinical trials of treatment and prophylaxis with these agents. The cyclosporine-treated rat appears to be a useful model in which to evaluate compounds for the treatment and prophylaxis of disseminated MAC infections.     

Erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin: are the differences real?

Erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin are clinically effective for the treatment of common respiratory and skin/skin-structure infections. Erythromycin and azithromycin are also effective for treatment of nongonococcal urethritis and cervicitis due to Chlamydia trachomatis. Compared with erythromycin, clarithromycin and azithromycin offer improved tolerability. Clarithromycin, however, is more similar to erythromycin in pharmacokinetic measures such as half-life, tissue distribution, and drug interactions. Misunderstandings about differences among the macrolides (erythromycin and clarithromycin) and the azalide (azithromycin) in terms of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, spectrum of activity, safety, and cost are common. The uptake and release of these compounds by white blood cells and fibroblasts account for differences in tissue half-life, volume of distribution, intracellular:extracellular ratio, and in vivo potency. Although microbiologic studies reveal that gram-positive pathogens are equally susceptible to these agents, significantly more isolates of Haemophilus influenzae are susceptible to azithromycin than to erythromycin or clarithromycin. Concentrations achieved at the infection site and duration above the minimum inhibitory concentration are as important as in vitro activity in determining in vivo activity against bacterial pathogens. Analysis of safety data indicates differences among these agents in drug interactions and use in pregnancy. Analysis of safety data reveals pharmacokinetic drug interactions for erythromycin and clarithromycin with theophylline, terfenadine, and carbamazepine that are not found with azithromycin. Both erythromycin and azithromycin are pregnancy category B drugs; clarithromycin is a category C drug. The numerous differences in pharmacokinetics, microbiology, safety, and costs among erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin can be used in the judicious selection of treatment for indicated infections.     

Azithromycin. A review of its pharmacological properties and use as 3-day therapy in respiratory tract infections

The azalide antibacterial agent azithromycin is a semisynthetic acid-stable erythromycin derivative with an expanded spectrum of activity and improved tissue pharmacokinetic characteristics relative to erythromycin. The drug is noted for its activity against some Gram-negative organisms associated with respiratory tract infections, particularly Haemophilus influenzae. Azithromycin has similar activity to other macrolides against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Moraxella catarrhalis, and is active against atypical pathogens such as Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Once-daily administration of azithromycin is made possible by the long elimination half-life of the drug from tissue. Azithromycin is rapidly and highly concentrated in a number of cell types after absorption, including leucocytes, monocytes and macrophages. It undergoes extensive distribution into tissue, from where it is subsequently eliminated slowly. A 3-day oral regimen of once-daily azithromycin has been shown to be as effective as 5- to 10-day courses of other more frequently administered antibacterial agents [such as erythromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V)] in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, pneumonia, sinusitis, pharyngitis, tonsillitis and otitis media. Adverse effects of azithromycin are mainly gastrointestinal in nature and occur less frequently than with erythromycin. Azithromycin is likely to prove most useful as a 3-day regimen in the empirical management of respiratory tract infections in the community. Its ease of administration and 3-day duration of therapy, together with its good gastrointestinal tolerability, should optimise patient compliance (the highest level of which is achieved with once-daily regimens). Azithromycin is also likely to be useful in the hospital setting, particularly for outpatients and for those unable to tolerate erythromycin.     

Developmental toxicity of 4-substituted amphetamines in mice

Until recently, therapy for most Nontuberculous Mycobacterial (NTM) disease, especially disease caused by Mycobacterium avium-complex (MAC), has been difficult and frustrating. The introduction of the newer macrolides (clarithromycin and azithromycin) has significantly added to the efficacy of regimens for both disseminated and pulmonary MAC disease. Clinical activity of these agents is lost when a MAC isolate develops in-vitro resistance that is facilitated by use of the macrolides as single agents. These valuable drugs should, therefore, never be used as single agents for the treatment of disseminated or pulmonary MAC disease. The newer macrolides also show promise for the treatment of other NTM infections such as those caused by M. abscessus, M. fortuitum, M. chelonae, M. xenopi, M. marinum, M. haemophilum, and M. genavense. Rifabutin, a derivative of rifamycin S, is an effective agent for prophylaxis against disseminated MAC and may have utility for treatment of pulmonary and disseminated MAC disease. Interactions between clarithromycin and rifamycin may alter efficacy of the macrolide and enhance toxicity of rifabutin. Although therapy of many NTM infections remains difficult with somewhat unpredictable results, the introduction of newer drugs, particularly the macrolides, has appreciably improved a previously dismal outlook for successful therapy.     

Ocular levels of azithromycin

OBJECTIVE: To assess azithromycin levels in human serum, aqueous humor, tear fluid, and conjunctival tissue specimens after administration of a single 1-g oral dose of azithromycin. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing cataract surgery were included in this analysis. Serum, aqueous, and tear specimens were collected 3, 6, and 12 hours and 1, 2, 3, and 4 days after azithromycin administration. Conjunctival tissue biopsy specimens were collected 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 days after azithromycin administration. All specimens were subjected to analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Azithromycin concentration ranges during the specified sampling times were as follows: serum, 21 to 974 ng/mL; tear, 82 to 2892 ng/mL; aqueous, 10 to 69 ng/mL; and conjunctival, 0.7 to 32 micrograms/g. Levels above the 90% minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC90) for Chlamydia trachomatis were detected after 4 days in all tear samples and after 14 days in all conjunctival tissue specimens following oral azithromycin administration. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated prolonged high levels of azithromycin in drug-targeted ocular tissue. Prolonged high concentrations of azithromycin in conjunctival tissue make this drug suitable for treatment of conjunctivitis caused by chlamydiae and other susceptible organisms.     

Miocamycin. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential

Miocamycin is an orally administered 16-membered macrolide antimicrobial drug. It has a spectrum of in vitro activity similar to that of erythromycin, inhibiting a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, atypical microbes and some anaerobes. Importantly, miocamycin demonstrates greater in vitro potency than erythromycin against several pathogens including Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma hominis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Equally noteworthy is its activity against erythromycin-resistant staphylococcal and streptococcal species expressing inducible-type resistance. Miocamycin possesses poor overall activity against Haemophilus influenzae and is inactive against Enterobacteriaceae. Penetration of miocamycin into body tissues and fluids is both rapid and extensive. The 3 major metabolites of miocamycin possess antimicrobial activity and may contribute to the therapeutic efficacy of the drug. Clinical data indicate that miocamycin is useful in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections in both adult and paediatric patients. Miocamycin is also effective in the treatment of urogenital tract infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis or U. urealyticum. Several studies suggest that miocamycin is at least as effective as erythromycin in these indications; however, comparisons with newer macrolide agents have yet to be performed. In other studies, miocamycin proved to be a useful agent in the treatment of periodontal infections and as anti-infective prophylaxis in dental surgery. Miocamycin appears to have a tolerability profile qualitatively similar to that of other macrolides, with gastrointestinal and skin disorders being the most commonly reported adverse events. Current data suggest that the potential for drug interactions with miocamycin is low, with the possible exceptions of carbamazepine and cyclosporin. Thus, although further confirmation and elaboration of various aspects of its efficacy and tolerability profile is needed, at this stage miocamycin offers a useful alternative oral therapy to erythromycin for the treatment of uncomplicated community-acquired respiratory tract infections and nongonococcal urethritis.     

Nitrogen dioxide, gas heating and respiratory illness

METHODS: Test-of-cure of 19 patients with Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection was assessed by daily collection of first void urine for 7 days just after treatment by azithromycin single-dose. RESULTS: Detection by PCR and TMA of C. trachomatis showed a good correlation between both methods. The observation that post-therapy chlamydial nucleic acid detection is associated to bacterial clearance suggests that all the patients were cured.     

Tinidazole: a review of its antiprotozoal activity and therapeutic efficacy

Tinidazole, a synthetic imidazole derivative, has been used in the oral treatment of several protozoal infections - trichomoniasis, giardiasis and amoebiasis. Among the protozoal organisms inhibited by tinidazole are Trichomonas vaginalis, Trichomonas foetus, and Entamoeba histolytica. In vitro, tinidazole has been shown to possess antiprotozoal activity at least comparable to, and in some cases greater than, metronidazole. Tinidazole also has activity against some Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli, including Bacteroides spp. Following oral administration of a 2g dose, like metronidazole serum levels peak in about 2 hours but persist for longer. Any clinical significance of the longer plasma half-life (tinidazole 12.5h; metronidazole 7.3h) has yet to be demonstrated. Tinidazole is approximately 20% bound to plasma proteins. Only unchanged drug has been found in the plasma and urine of tinidazole-treated subjects, although metabolites have been detected in animal studies. A single 2g dose of tinidazole has been shown to be effective therapy in vaginal trichomoniasis and in urogenital trichomoniasis in males. Single-dose therapy in general offers advantages in regard to convenience, and in the treatment of a sexually transmissible disease such as trichomoniasis, single-dose therapy facilitates compliance of patient and sexual partner. In comparative studies, tinidazole, in both single-dose and traditional multiple-dose regimens, has been shown to be equivalent and often superior to other antitrichomonal agents, including metronidazole. In intestinal amoebiasis, tinidazole has been evaluated after both once-a-day and multiple daily dose regimens, with the former giving slightly better results. When both metronidazole and tinidazole were administered in multiple daily dose regimens, the two agents yielded similar cure rates; in one study fewer tinidazole-treated patients required a second course. Tinidazole has also been successful in some cases of amoebic liver abscess, but an advantage over metronidazole has not been demonstrated. Results in the treatment of giardiasis, especially with the single-dose regimen, are promising, and in one study, tinidazole proved effective in infections resistant to metronidazole. Even in large doses, tinidazole has been well tolerated, although rarely vomiting may occur and the patient may need to be re-treated with a multiple dose regimen.     

Pharmacokinetics and bactericidal activity of a single daily dose of netilmicin in the treatment of CAPD-associated peritonitis

Single daily dosage of netilmicin is generally accepted in systemic infections, due to biphasic bactericidal activity and prolonged postantibiotic effect of aminoglycosides. Since little is known about the efficacy of single daily intraperitoneal application of netilmicin in the treatment of CAPD-associated peritonitis, we conducted this prospective study. Seven patients with CAPD-associated peritonitis were treated with a single daily dose of netilmicin (loading dose 1.5 mg/kg, followed by 40 mg/21 bag/day). Serum and intraperitoneal levels as well as bactericidal activity of netilmicin against Acinetobacter baumanii, E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were measured for 48 hours. Serum and peritoneal levels widely varied among the patients due to different interindividual plasma clearance of netilmicin. The intraperitoneal antibacterial action of netilmicin was decreased, more over, substantial differences in the bactericidal activity were found among the patients. However, with high initial netilmicin levels sufficient bactericidal activity was found for Acinetobacter and E. coli, but not for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Hence, a single daily dosage of netilmicin can be a suitable treatment of CAPD-associated peritonitis, only if the dose is adapted according to the first serum and peritoneal levels. In infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa higher peritoneal levels of netilmicin and the combination with other antibiotics will be needed for a sufficient peritoneal bactericidal activity.     

Ceftriaxone (Rocefin) in the treatment of bronchopulmonary infections]

Ceftriaxone, cephalosporin of the third generation, was given to 40 adults admitted to hospital for bronchopulmonary infections. Pneumonia and aggravation of chronic bronchitis were diagnosed in 27 and 13 patients, respectively. The drug was given in a single daily dose 1-2 g intravenously or intramuscularly. Mean duration of the treatment course was 6.13 days. High efficacy of the antibiotic ceftriaxone was observed in 38(95%) patients. One woman failed the treatment. She had pneumonia following polychemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. The drug tolerance was good. Only one allergic reaction occurred. The study of the sensitivity of 333 strains of the bacteria isolated from the sputum of 235 pulmonological patients showed that the absolute majority of the strains (98%) of both gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms are suppressed by ceftriaxone. Thus, the conclusion is made on efficacy of ceftriaxone against bronchopulmonary infections. The drug is applicable both in hospitals and outpatiently.     

Azithromycin in the treatment of periodontal disease. Effect on microbial flora

Azithromycin is an azalide antibiotic with excellent in vitro activity against a wide variety of oral bacteria. It has a long half-life, good tissue penetration and is preferentially taken up by phagocytes. We investigated the microbiological efficacy of azithromycin as an adjunct to the non-surgical treatment of adult chronic periodontitis; its clinical efficacy is dealt with in a separate paper. 46 patients were treated in a double-blind placebo controlled trial. Microbiological assessment of the same periodontal pocket (initially > 6 mm) was made at weeks 0, 2, 3, 6, 10 and 22. Either azithromycin 500 mg 1 x daily for 3 days or placebo was given at week 2. Particular attention was paid to the numbers of black pigmented anaerobes and spirochaetes present since these are the most commonly implicated pathogens in periodontal disease. Pigmented anaerobes were significantly reduced at weeks 3 and 6 in patients who received azithromycin compared to placebo and remained lower, although not significantly so, throughout the study. Counts of spirochaetes were significantly reduced throughout the study in patients who received azithromycin compared to placebo. Our microbiological study suggests that azithromycin may be useful as an adjunct in the treatment of periodontal disease.     

Pharmacologic and clinical comparison of cefaclor in immediate-release capsule and extended-release tablet forms

A new controlled-delivery, extended-release 500-mg formulation of cefaclor that is administered twice daily may improve patient compliance compared with the older, immediate-release 250-mg formulation that is administered three times daily. When the extended-release tablet is administered with food, peak plasma cefaclor concentrations are achieved about 2.5 hours after the dose compared with about 1 hour after a dose with the immediate-release capsule. However, the two formulations have an equivalent extent of absorption and equivalent pharmacokinetics after absorption. Cefaclor has retained its excellent in vitro activity against the pathogens most commonly associated with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, namely, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clinical trials show similar efficacy of the two formulations in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis caused by these organisms, but for this indication a 7-day regimen may be used with the extended-release 500-mg formulation compared with a 10-day dosing regimen with the 250-mg capsule. The shorter course of treatment with the new formulation may also improve patient compliance.     

Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA assay with specimens from women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic

Chlamydia trachomatis infections are the most prevalent sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the United States. In acute-care settings such as clinics and emergency rooms, a desirable chlamydia screening assay should exhibit good sensitivity and good specificity and should provide test results while the patient is still present. The Biostar Chlamydia OIA (Biostar, Inc., Boulder, Colo.) is an optical immunoassay (OIA) that provides test results in less than 30 min and that uses a test format that allows office-based testing. This assay is performed entirely at room temperature without the need for rotators or other specialized equipment. The goal of this study was to compare the performance of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA for the detection of C. trachomatis with the performance of cell culture, direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) assay (Syva MicroTrak; Syva Co., Palo Alto, Calif.), and PCR (Roche Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis; Roche, Branchburg, N.J.) for the detection of C. trachomatis infections in women attending an urban STD clinic. For calculations of relative test performance (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values), patient specimens that yielded positive results by two or more of the four assays (cell culture, DFA assay, PCR, and OIA) were classified as "true infections." By these criteria, 42 of 306 total specimens were classified as positive for C. trachomatis (positive prevalence, 13.7%), 11 (3.6%; 10 by PCR and 1 by DFA assay) were positive by a single assay, and 253 (82.7%) were negative by all four tests. All culture-positive specimens were also positive by at least one other assay. Among the culture-negative specimens, 14(5%) specimens were positive by two of the three non-culture-based assays used. By using the criterion that positivity by at least two of the tests indicated a true infection,the relative sensitivities were as follows: culture and PCR, 92.9% each; Biostar Chlamydia OIA, 73.8%; and DFA assay, 59.5%.