Pressure-Dependent EPANET Extension

In water distribution systems (WDSs), the available flow at a demand node is dependent on the pressure at that node. When a network is lacking in pressure, not all consumer demands will be met in full. In this context, the assumption that all demands are fully satisfied regardless of the pressure in the system becomes unreasonable and represents the main limitation of the conventional demand driven analysis (DDA) approach to WDS modelling. A realistic depiction of the network performance can only be attained by considering demands to be pressure dependent. This paper presents an extension of the renowned DDA based hydraulic simulator EPANET 2 to incorporate pressure-dependent demands. This extension is termed “EPANET-PDX” (pressure-dependent extension) herein. The utilization of a continuous nodal pressure-flow function coupled with a line search and backtracking procedure greatly enhance the algorithm’s convergence rate and robustness. Simulations of real life networks consisting of multiple sources, pipes, valves and pumps were successfully executed and results are presented herein. Excellent modelling performance was achieved for analysing both normal and pressure deficient conditions of the WDSs. Detailed computational efficiency results of EPANET-PDX with reference to EPANET 2 are included as well.     

Simulation of Water Distribution Network under Pressure-Deficient Condition

Pressure deficient condition occurs in the water distribution network (WDN) when the nodal demands are in excess of the design discharge as in the case of fire demand, pump failure, pipe breaks, valve failure etc. It causes either no-flow or partial-flow depending upon the available pressure head at the nodes. To evaluate the nodal flows in such condition, node flow analysis (NFA) gives reasonable results in comparison to demand-driven analysis (DDA) and head-dependent analysis (HDA). The NFA works on the predefined pressure-discharge relationship to evaluate the nodal flows. However, this approach requires human intervention and hence cannot be applied to large WDN. Recently, modified pressure-deficient network algorithm (M-PDNA) has been developed by Babu and Mohan (2012) for pressure-deficient analysis with EPANET toolkit. However, it requires modification of the source code of EPANET. In this study a relationship with the M-PDNA and node flow analysis (Gupta and Bhave 1996) has been investigated and it is found that M-PDNA is the simplified version of NFA. Further, the working principle of M-PDNA has been investigated with suitable examples of Babu and Mohan (2012). The theoretical basis of M-PDNA has not been investigated in terms of head-discharge relationship. Herein, a head-discharge relationship based on the working principal of M-PDNA is proposed. Some of the toolkits are also readily available to modify demand driven solver of EPANET 2 to suit for the pressure-driven analysis and then it can be used for analysing pressure deficient network. Also in this study, a modification in M-PDNA approach is proposed which does not require the use of EPANET toolkit which is found to be capable of simulating both pressure-sufficient and pressure-deficient conditions in a single hydraulic simulation. Using the proposed approach, pressure-deficient condition is analysed with constant and variable demand pattern.     

Hydraulic Analysis of Water Distribution Systems Based on Fixed Point Iteration Method

Water distribution systems with complex configurations are important urban facilities and the hydraulic analysis is essential for system design, optimization and management. Hydraulic analysis involves the procedure of calculating the hydraulic parameters of nodal pressure heads and pipe flow rates under steady-state condition. The equations governing the heads and flows are nonlinear and the most popular method for solving the equations is the Newton-Raphson method, which is the basis of existing hydraulic simulator (EPANET 2). In this paper, fixed point iteration method is proposed for hydraulic analysis after transformation of the original nonlinear equations. Compared to EPANET 2, the proposed method can analyze a water distribution system without differentiation for the convergence for some problems which cannot be solved by EPANET 2. Three test networks were analyzed by the proposed method and EPANET 2. It is proved that the proposed method could get the convergence after a series of iterations, even in cases that EPANET 2 fail. And the initial values of nodal pressure heads and the specified calculation accuracy are considered to have influences on the calculation procedure.     

Noniterative Implementation of Pressure-Dependent Demands Using the Hydraulic Analysis Engine of EPANET 2

To analyze water distribution networks under pressure-deficient conditions, most of the available hydraulic simulators, including EPANET 2, must be either modified by embedding pressure-dependent demands in the governing network equations or run repeatedly with successive adjustments made to specific parameters until a sufficient hydraulic consistency is obtained. This paper presents and discusses a simple technique that implements the square root relationship between the nodal demand and the nodal pressure using EPANET 2 tools and allows a water distribution network with pressure-dependent demands to be solved in a single run of the unmodified snapshot hydraulic analysis engine of EPANET 2. In this technique, artificial strings made up of a flow control valve, a pipe with a check valve, and a reservoir are connected to the demand nodes before running the engine, and the pressure-dependent demands are determined as the flows in the strings. The resistance of the artificial pipes is chosen such that the demands are satisfied in full at a desired nodal pressure. The proposed technique shows reasonable convergence as evidenced by its testing on example networks.     

Evaluation of Reliability Indicators for WDNs with Demand-Driven and Pressure-Driven Models

Reliability of water distribution networks (WDNs) has received much attention in recent years due to progressive aging of infrastructures and climate change. Several reliability indicators, focusing on hydraulic aspects rather than water quality, have been proposed in literature. Reliability is generally assessed resorting to well established methods coupling hydraulic simulations and stochastic techniques that describe the WDNs hydraulic performance and component availability respectively. Two main algorithms are employed to simulate WDNs: the demand driven approach (DDA) that disregards the physical relationship between actual water demand and nodal pressure, and the pressure driven approach (PDA) that explicitly incorporates it. In this paper, we show how the choice of hydraulic solver may affect reliability indicators. We modify existing quantitative indicators at nodal and network level, and define novel indicators to consider water quality aspects. These indicators are evaluated for three example WDNs; discrepancies between results obtained with the two approaches depend on network size, feeding scheme and skeletonization. Results suggest to use with caution the DDA for reliability assessment at both local and global level.     

Evolutionary Testing of Hydraulic Simulator Functionality

A method for automatic functional testing of hydraulic simulators is proposed. The method is based on using genetic algorithms to search for network parameter values at which the simulator under test computes solutions that do not satisfy the governing network equations. The search is made by maximizing the residual of the governing equations. The application of the method to the latest version of the EPANET hydraulic simulator demonstrates its efficiency in detecting incorrect results. The results of quantitative assessment of the functional adequacy of the EPANET solver by random testing are presented. The paper provides examples of hydraulic networks and of parameter value combinations for which incorrect results occur. An example of the use of automatic functional testing together with automatic convergence testing in a comprehensive study of the flow control valve model of the EPANET solver is given.     

Nodal Analysis of Urban Water Distribution Networks

There are three methods for analysing the flow and pressure distribution in looped water supply networks (the loop method, the node method, the pipe method), accounting for the chosen unknown hydraulic parameters. For all of these methods, the nonlinear system of equations can be solved using iterative procedures (Hardy–Cross, Newton–Raphson, linear theory). In the cases of the extension or the rehabilitation of distribution networks, the unknown parameters are the hydraulic heads at nodes, and the nodal method for network analysis is preferred. In this paper, a generalised classic model is developed for the nodal analysis of complex looped systems with non-standard network components and the solvability of new problems, along with the determination of the pressure state in the system. In addition, this paper exhibits a different approach to this problem by using the variational formulation method for the development of a new analysis model based on unconditioned optimisation techniques. This model has the advantage of using a specialised optimisation algorithm, which directly minimises an objective multivariable function without constraints, implemented in a computer program. The two proposed models are compared with the classic Hardy–Cross method, and the results indicated a good performance of these models. Finally, a study is performed regarding the implications of the long-term operation of the pipe network on energy consumption using these models. The new models can serve as guidelines to supplement existing procedures of network analysis.     

Extending EPANET hydraulic solver capacity with rigid water column global gradient algorithm

EPANET is one of the most commonly used open-source programs in hydraulic modelling water distribution networks (WDNs), based on steady-state and extended period simulation approaches. These approaches effectively estimate flow capacity and average pressures in networks; however, EPANET is not yet fully effective in modelling incompressible unsteady flows in WDNs. In this study, the hydraulic solver capacity of EPANET 3 is extended with the Rigid Water Column Global Gradient Algorithm (RWC-GGA) to model incompressible unsteady flow hydraulics in WDNs. Moreover, we incorporated dynamically more accurate valve expressions than the existing ones in the default EPANET code and introduced a new global convergence algorithm, Convergence Tracking Control Method (CTCM), in the solver code. The RWC-GGA, CTCM, and valve expressions are tested and validated in three different WDNs varying from simple to sophisticated set-ups. The results show that incompressible unsteady flows can be modelled with RWC-CGA and dynamic valve representations. Finally, the convergence problem due to the valve motion and the pressure-dependent algorithm (PDA) is solved by the implemented global convergence algorithm, i.e. CTCM.     

A New Method for Simultaneous Calibration of Demand Pattern and Hazen-Williams Coefficients in Water Distribution Systems

Water distribution systems, where flow in some pipes is not measured or storage tanks are connected together, calculation of demand pattern coefficients of the network is difficult. Since, Hazen-Williams coefficients of the network are also unknown; the problem is becoming unintelligible further. The present study proposes a new method for simultaneous calibration of demand pattern and Hazen-Williams coefficients that uses the Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithms coupled with the hydraulic simulator (EPANET2) in a MATLAB code. In this paper demand pattern and Hazen-Williams coefficients are the calibration parameters and measured data consist of nodal pressure heads and pipe flows. The defined objective function minimizes the difference between the measured and simulated values. The new proposed method was tested on a two-loop test example and a real water distribution network. The results show that the new calibration model is able to calibrate demand pattern and Hazen-Williams coefficients simultaneously with high precision and accuracy.     

Method for Extended Period Simulation of Water Distribution Networks with Pressure Driven Demands

This paper proposes a non-iterative method to perform the simulation of water distribution systems with pressure driven demands using EPANET2 without the need to use its programmer’s toolkit. The method works for single period simulation (snapshot) and for extended period simulation (EPS) as well. It is based on the addition of a flow control valve (FCV), a throttle control valve (TCV), a check valve (CV) and a reservoir to each demand node in the network, in addition to a list of simple controls to modify the setting of the FCV and TCV in each time step. The main advantages of this approach are: 1. the source code of EPANET2 is not modified, 2. the toolkit functions are not needed for the simulation and they remain available for further uses, 3. the extended period simulation (EPS) is performed by EPANET2 and it carries tank levels, demand variation and other time-changing variables internally. The performance of the method is tested in two benchmark networks and a real size network with pumps, tanks and a 24 h demand pattern. The results show that the method computed the pressures and outflows accurately and that the computational time required is not significantly higher than a demand driven execution in most cases.     

Pressure Control for Leakage Minimisation in Water Distribution Systems Management

A model to support decision systems regarding the quantification, location and opening adjustment of control valves in a network system, with the main objective to minimise pressures and consequently leakage levels is developed. This research work aims at a solution that allows simultaneously optimising the number of valves and its location, as well as valves opening adjustments for simulation in an extended period, dependently of the system characteristics. EPANET model is used for hydraulic network analysis and two operational models are developed based on the Genetic Algorithm optimisation method for pressure control, and consequently leakage reduction, since a leak is a pressure dependent function. In these two modules, this method has guaranteed an adequate technique performance, which demands a global evaluation of the system for different scenarios. A case study is presented to show the efficiency of the system by pressure control through valves management.     

Integration of Hydraulic and Water Quality Modelling in Distribution Networks: EPANET-PMX

Simulation models for water distribution networks are used routinely for many purposes. Some examples are planning, design, monitoring and control. However, under conditions of low pressure, the conventional models that employ demand-driven analysis often provide misleading results. On the other hand, almost all the models that employ pressure-driven analysis do not perform dynamic and/or water quality simulations seamlessly. Typically, they exclude key elements such as pumps, control devices and tanks. EPANET-PDX is a pressure-driven extension of the EPANET 2 simulation model that preserved the capabilities of EPANET 2 including water quality modelling. However, it cannot simulate multiple chemical substances at once. The single-species approach to water quality modelling is inefficient and somewhat unrealistic. The reason is that different chemical substances may co-exist in water distribution networks. This article proposes a fully integrated network analysis model (EPANET-PMX) (pressure-dependent multi-species extension) that addresses these weaknesses. The model performs both steady state and dynamic simulations. It is applicable to any network with various combinations of chemical reactions and reaction kinetics. Examples that demonstrate its effectiveness are included.     

Technical and Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Water Distribution Systems

An environmental and technical sustainability assessment methodology is developed for both centralized and dual water distribution systems (WDSs) with and without fire flow scenarios. Technical sustainability of potable and reclaimed water networks is measured by a sustainability index (SI) assessment using reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability performance criteria. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPANET software is used to simulate hydraulic (i.e. nodal pressure) and water quality (i.e. water age) analysis in a WDS. Total fresh water use and total energy intensity are considered as environmental sustainability criteria. The procedure considers two separate alternatives for meeting fire flows: (1) adding pumping to a system or (2) adding a non-potable WDS. The reclaimed system is designed using linear programming (LP) optimization. For each alternative, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is used to combine technical and environmental sustainability criteria for an urban WDS.     

EPANET软件在区域供水管网改造设计中的应用

以天津市某区域的供水管网为例,利用EPANET软件对其进行水力计算,指明现有管网的缺陷.为了保障其安全性,根据实际调研设计管网改造方案,选取关键节点作为改造前后对比分析的依据.根据最终水力计算结果,验证改造方案的合理性,为实际的改造工程提供理论依据.     

Sustainability Assessment of Urban Water Distribution Systems

A methodology is presented for determining sustainability indices for pressure and water age in water distribution systems (WDSs). These sustainability indices are based upon performance criteria including reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability. Pressure and water age are determined for a WDS as a function of operation time using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPANET model. The values of pressure and water age are used to determine reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability performance criteria, which are then combined into the nodal sustainability indices for water age and pressure. In addition, the sustainability index (SI) computations are performed for zones to define the SI for water age and SI for pressure. A combined SI calculation is performed to produce an overall sustainability score for the entire zone in the water distribution network. The proposed methodology can be used to monitor the sustainability of existing WDSs and to help define alternative solutions including changes in pump operation and modifications to WDS to increase the sustainability.     

Convergence of a Hydraulic Solver with Pressure-Dependent Demands

This paper analyzes the convergence of a pressure-driven analysis (PDA) model of a water distribution network solver based on Todini’s global gradient algorithm. The PDA model is constructed by embedding a pressure?demand relationship in the EPANET simulator code. To avoid spurious convergence, a residual-based convergence error was used. The introduction of pressure-dependent demands is shown to result in a far poorer convergence. The study of solver convergence as a function of the smoothness of the pressure?demand curve has demonstrated that, statistically, a smooth pressure?demand relationship gives a somewhat better convergence. To improve convergence, use was made of a quadratic approximation of the Hazen–Williams head loss?flow relationship in the vicinity of zero and the correct implementation of the Darcy?Weisbach formula in the solver. To further improve convergence, an iteration step control technique called the line search was used. The analysis of solver convergence for different line search variants has shown that the line search in its usual form is not efficient enough and may result in poorer convergence. A necessary error decrease algorithm, whose use in the line search improves solver convergence, is proposed. It is shown that due to the convergence improvement methods the convergence of the PDA solver is somewhat better than that of the demand-driven analysis solver and sufficient for direct problems such as design, for example.     

Calibration Model for Water Distribution Network Using Pressures Estimated by Artificial Neural Networks

The success of hydraulic simulation models of water distribution networks is associated with the ability of these models to represent real systems accurately. To achieve this, the calibration phase is essential. Current calibration methods are based on minimizing the error between measured and simulated values of pressure and flow. This minimization is based on a search of parameter values to be calibrated, including pipe roughness, nodal demand, and leakage flow. The resulting hydraulic problem contains several variables. In addition, a limited set of known monitored pressure and flow values creates an indeterminate problem with more variables than equations. Seeking to address the lack of monitored data for the calibration of Water Distribution Networks (WDNs), this paper uses a meta-model based on an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to estimate pressure on all nodes of a network. The calibration of pipe roughness applies a metaheuristic search method called Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to minimize the objective function represented by the difference between simulated and forecasted pressure values. The proposed method is evaluated at steady state and over an extended period for a real District Metering Area (DMA), named Campos do Conde II, and the hypothetical network named C-town, which is used as a benchmark for calibration studies.     

基于非线性映射理论的城市供水管网压力监测点布置方法研究

通过对非线性映射理论及技术的研究和应用,提出了一种新的城市供水管网压力监测点布置方法。以某开发区供水管网为例,首先利用EPANET水力模拟软件对供水管网不同运行工况进行水力模拟,得到各节点压力模拟数值矩阵。然后,采用非线性映射分析方法对该压力模拟数值矩阵进行非线性映射变换,得到一系列独立的二维点群,实现压力变化特征相似节点的聚类和分组。最后,根据各节点压力变化的近似程度和特征,提出供水管网压力监测点的布置方案。应用表明,该方法实用性强,提高了节点压力分析的直观程度和可视化水平。     

Topographic Energy Management in Water Distribution Systems

A significant amount of energy is required to operate pressurised water distribution systems, and therefore, improving their efficiency is crucial. Traditionally, more emphasis has been placed on operational losses (pumping inefficiencies, excess leakage or friction in pipes) than on structural (or topographic) losses, which arise because of the irregular (unchangeable) terrain on which the system is located and the network’s layout. Hence, modifying the network to adopt an ecologically friendly layout is the only way to reduce structural losses. With the aim of improving the management of water distribution systems and optimising their energy use, this work audits and classifies water networks’ structural losses (derived from topographic energy), which constitutes the main novelty of this paper. Energy can be recovered with PATs (pumps as turbines) or removed through PRVs (pressure reducing valves). The proposed hydraulic analysis clarifies how that energy is used and identifies the most suitable strategy for improving efficiency as locating the most suitable place to install PRVs or PATs. Two examples are discussed to illustrate the relevance of this analysis.

     

Comparison Among Resilience and Entropy Index in the Optimal Rehabilitation of Water Distribution Networks Under Limited-Budgets

The replacement of existing pipes is a strategy for the rehabilitation of water distribution networks that is frequently adopted by water companies. Usually, the optimal choice of the pipes diameter is a difficult optimization task, because limited budgets are available. In order to support the selection of a rehabilitation strategy, surrogate reliability measures are often used as an indirect measure of the water distribution system hydraulic performance. Among others, the resilience and entropy indices have attracted considerable interest because they both represent a measure of the network robustness. In the present work, a comparison between these indices is provided in the framework of the optimal rehabilitation of an existing network under limited budget constraint. The resilience and entropy indices are applied to the case of a realistic water distribution network in an extended period simulation framework. Several values of the maximum budget allocable for rehabilitation are considered, and hydraulic calculations are undertaken by means of a pressure driven approach within a modified EPANET 2 environment. The effectiveness of the two surrogate reliability measures is demonstrated by an a-posteriori reliability assessment.