Late clinical outcome in a randomized prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis

BACKGROUND: Functional outcome after rectal excision with coloanal anastomosis is improved by construction of a colonic J pouch. Present prospective randomized studies lack follow-up beyond 1 year. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome at both short- and long-term follow-up. METHODS: Forty patients with low rectal cancer were randomized prospectively to either J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis or a straight coloanal anastomosis. Clinical assessments were performed 3, 12 and 24 months after colostomy closure using a standard questionnaire and physical examination. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups. There was a significant (P < 0.01) improvement in frequency of defaecation at 3, 12 and 24 months for patients with a reservoir. Similarly, fragmentation (clustering of stools) was significantly less at 3 and 12 months (P < 0.01) in the reservoir group, and incontinence occurred less frequently in the first year (P = 0.09). By 24 months no patient in either group suffered from major or minor incontinence. CONCLUSION: The functional improvement gained from a colonic reservoir in coloanal anastomosis continues to benefit the patient for at least 2 years.     

Coordinated activity of the new "rectum" and anal sphincter after sphincter-saving resection of the rectum for colitis or carcinoma

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether coordinated activity exists across a stapled enteroanal anastomosis. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were studied for a median of one year after complete excision of the rectum and stapled enteroanal anastomosis; 12 patients underwent low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma, and 17 patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis. RESULTS: Maximum anal resting pressures were slightly lower after coloanal anastomosis than after ileoanal anastomosis [median range, 56 (11-60) cm H2O, cf 69 (40-107) cm H2O, P = NS]. During distention of the neorectum, anal sphincter pressures at 2.5, 1.5, and 0.5 cm from the anal verge were significantly lower after coloanal anastomosis compared with after ileoanal anastomosis (P < 0.01 at each station). The volume of neorectal distention required to produce maximal inhibition of the anal sphincter was significantly less after coloanal anastomosis at 50 (range, 20-60) ml of air than after ileoanal anastomosis at 240 (range, 100-420) ml of air (P < 0.01). Minor fecal leakage and urgency of bowel action were significantly more common after coloanal anastomosis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Alterations in the dynamic response of the anal sphincter to distention of the neorectum may explain why the clinical results were better after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis than after coloanal anastomosis.     

Ileoanal reservoir dysfunction: a problem-solving approach

BACKGROUND: Many technical difficulties of the ileoanal reservoir operation have been overcome, allowing acceptable morbidity in the hands of both the frequent and less frequent operator. However, a minority of patients have persistently unsatisfactory pouch function, which can be a difficult problem to manage. METHODS: A Medline search was carried out to identify relevant papers published from November 1996 to January 1978. For clinical information more emphasis was given to recent publications with larger numbers. Where appropriate, information from other sources and some local data were included. RESULTS: Most patients empty the pouch four to eight times a day with perfect continence and no urgency, and are considered to have acceptable function with which they are satisfied. Patients who have poor function beyond an easily treated episode of pouchitis require the expertise of a multidisciplinary team offering some understanding of the anatomy, physiology and pathology of the gastrointestinal tract in general and of the ileal reservoir in particular. A thorough and persistent approach to difficult cases is often rewarded with a good outcome, with the exception of problems arising from postoperative sepsis. The temptation to use pouchitis as a waste-basket diagnosis for poorly understood dysfunction should be avoided. Problems causing poor function may originate in the pouch (including pelvic sepsis), the pouch outlet, or the small bowel above the pouch, and these areas need to be considered in each case. CONCLUSION: To optimize the benefits of restorative pouch surgery, both patients and physicians need to understand aspects of fine tuning of pouch function, including diet, medication and lifestyle. In managing ileoanal reservoir dysfunction the temptation to procrastinate should be resisted; an approach that is systematic and sympathetic should be adopted.     

Information you need to succeed

METHODS: Sixty-eight patients underwent elective colon resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR). RESULTS: Anastomotic dehiscence occurred in 3 patients (4.4%). Two of them had an end-to-end ileocolostomy using a 31 mm BAR. The anastomosis failure was due to ischaemic lesion of the small bowel close to the ileocolostomy, probably caused by a mismatch between the size of small bowel and that of the BAR. Another patient experienced anastomosis dehiscence probably due to a faecal impaction into the BAR. Forty-eight patients (70.5%) experienced troublesome constipation and evacuated after the sixth postoperative day. A bowel obstruction proximal to the BAR was documented in 4 cases who have been treated conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: The low rate of major complications justify the use of the BAR in elective colon surgery, but the surgeon must be aware of tedious postoperative obstructive episodes frequently encountered in this series.     

Comparing functional results one year and ten years after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice for most patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results, however remain undefined; the major concern is that function may deteriorate. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess functional outcome in a subgroup of patients who have an IPAA for chronic ulcerative colitis for > 10 years. METHODS: Among 1400 IPAA patients, 75 consecutive subjects (31 females and 44 males; median age 31 at operation) were identified who had the procedure prior to 1982. All patients had functional results recorded 1 year and 10 years following ileostomy closure. RESULTS: There were four deaths during the follow-up period; none were pouch related. Two patients refused ileostomy closure. Of the remaining 69 patients, there were 8 (11 percent) failures, leaving 61 subjects available for study. Stool frequency (7 +/- 3, mean +/- SD) remained unchanged. Of the 50 subjects with initially excellent daytime continence, 39 (78 percent) remained the same, 10 (20 percent) developed minor incontinence, and 1 developed poor control after 10 years. Four of 10 subjects (40 percent) with initial minor daytime incontinence remained unchanged, 4 (40 percent) improved, and 2 (20 percent) worsened. The one subject with poor control at one year was unchanged. Nocturnal fecal spotting increased over the 10-year period but not significantly (38 percent vs. 52 percent; P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: After IPAA, functional results in terms of stool frequency and rate of fecal incontinence did not deteriorate with time.     

CO2 laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II-III: complications and efficacy

PURPOSE: Functional outcome after anterior resection for rectal cancer is improved by colonic J-pouch reconstruction compared with straight anastomosis. The indications for colonic J-pouch reconstruction have yet to be determined. Therefore, we attempted to determine the level at which J-pouch reconstruction provides an advantage over straight anastomosis. METHODS: A total of 48 patients who underwent 5-cm colonic J-pouch reconstruction (J-pouch group) and 80 patients who underwent straight anastomosis (straight group) underwent functional assessment one year postoperatively. RESULTS: The functional outcome in the J-pouch group was significantly better than that in the straight group when the distance of the anastomosis from the anal verge was less than 8 cm. The difference was particularly obvious when the level of the anastomosis was below 4 cm. However, functional outcome in the straight group when the anastomosis was between 9 and 12 cm from the anal verge was also satisfactory and did not differ from that in the J-pouch group when the anastomosis was between 5 and 8 cm from the anal verge. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic J-pouch reconstruction is indicated when the distance of anastomosis from the anal verge is less than 8 cm, and it is essential when the distance is less than 4 cm.     

Injury in Canadian youth: a secondary analysis of the 1993-94 Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Survey

Nowadays surgery offers a complete spectrum of techniques for the treatment of rectal cancers. Progress in preoperative diagnostic techniques, especially in endoluminal ultrasound, and in the knowledge of anorectal physiology allows the surgeon to adopt a very individual strategy for the various tumor types. The situation has changed even for tumors of the middle and distal thirds of the rectum, which formerly were treated predominantly by abdominoperineal exstirpation. These can also be treated by sphincter-preserving techniques, the most ambitious of which is intersphincteric resection with coloanal anastomosis. Our experience shows that this method is not only comparable to the alternatives of conventional anterior resection and extirpation in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality but also achieves excellent oncological results. Of course, anorectal function is significantly altered by this type of surgery. Still, after an adaptive period of about 6-12 months a very satisfactory functional result is reached. Further functional improvement, especially in the early postoperative period, can possibly be expected from reconstruction with creation of a colon pouch.     

Similarities between pleuropulmonary blastoma and Askin tumor

AIM: The purpose of the study was to determine the risk of postoperative complications and the functional outcome after a hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis using a single J-shaped pouch design. METHODS: Preoperative function, operative morbidity and long-term functional outcome were assessed prospectively in 1310 patients who underwent IPAA between 1981 and 1994 for ulcerative colitis. RESULTS: Three patients died after operation. Postoperative pelvic sepsis rates decreased from 7 per cent in 1981-1985 to 3 per cent in 1991-1994 (P = 0.02). After mean follow-up of 6.5 (range 2-15) years, the mean number of stools was 5 per day and 1 per night. Frequent daytime and nighttime incontinence occurred in 7 and 12 per cent of patients respectively, and did not change over a 10-year period. The cumulative probability of suffering at least one episode of 'clinical' pouchitis was 18 and 48 per cent at 1 and 10 years and the cumulative probability of pouch failure at 1 and 10 years was 2 and 9 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that increased experience decreases the risk of pouch-related complications and that with time the functional results remain stable, but the failure rate increases.     

Typical complications and their control after restorative proctocolectomy

The overall rate of complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is 60%. This rate, however, includes complications such as bowel-obstruction and hernias. Pouch-related complications occur after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with a frequency of 15-25%. In an analysis of the recent literature the main risk factors are: tension of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, lack of protective ileostomy, preoperatively undiagnosed Crohn's disease and the experience of the surgeon. We classified pouch related-complications into (1) surgical complications (leakage, bleeding, pelvic sepsis, fistulas); (2) technical problems (long S-pouch spout, rectal cuff stenosis, etc.); (3) functional problems (anal sphincter insufficiency, night incontinence, hypermotility, evacuation disorders); (4) pouchitis; (5) pouch neoplasias. Pathogenesis, diagnostic features, and medical and surgical therapy are discussed in detail. In our own series of 11 pouch-redo operations we had 6 pouch fistulas (3 related to Crohn's disease, 3 postoperative fistulas), 3 wrongly constructed pouches, 1 chronic pouchitis and 1 long S-pouch spout. In 3 cases the pouch had to be excised completely. Two patients remained with a permanent ileostomy. In 6 patients the pouch could be preserved on long term. Due to the technical complexity, the need to understand pathophysiology and the need for a differentiated diagnostic procedure, this operation should be performed only in specialised centers.     

Bowel dysfunction after bladder reconstruction

PURPOSE: Bowel function may be disturbed after intestinal segments are used in urinary reconstruction. The etiology of this condition and its incidence in different patient groups is unclear. We studied the incidence of bowel disturbance in patients who underwent bladder replacement, continent diversion, enterocystoplasty for idiopathic detrusor instability and ileal conduit diversion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 71 patients after ileal conduit diversion and 82 after bladder reconstruction, including clam enterocystoplasty for detrusor instability in 28, neurogenic bladder dysfunction in 26 and nonneuropathic conditions in 28. We noted the severity of symptoms, such as frequency of defecation, nocturnal diarrhea, flatus leakage, fecal urgency, fecal incontinence and explosive diarrhea, as well as quality of life. RESULTS: Of the patients who underwent bladder reconstruction 24% had symptoms of bowel dysfunction preoperatively and 42% of those who were asymptomatic preoperatively described new bowel symptoms postoperatively. These symptoms were most common and severe in 54% of patients after clam enterocystoplasty for detrusor instability compared to 26% with neuropathy, 14% with a nonneuropathic condition and 15% with an ileal conduit. Compared to those in other groups patients who underwent enterocystoplasty for detrusor instability had a significantly higher incidence of nocturnal bowel movements (18 versus less than 4%, p <0.01), flatus leakage (29 versus less than 8%, p <0.01), fecal urgency (39 versus less than 12%, p <0.001) and fecal incontinence (32 versus less than 16%, p <0.001). The length of ileum used for clam enterocystoplasty was only slightly greater than that used for ileal conduit operations (25 versus 18 cm.). Of the patients who underwent enterocystoplasty for detrusor instability 29% regretted undergoing the procedure due to subsequent bowel symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: After enterocystoplasty for detrusor instability patients are at risk of significant bowel symptoms. The development of new bowel symptoms was associated with poor patient satisfaction.     

Interaction of organ donor families and recipients

PURPOSE: Functional results following anterior resection of the rectum have been sparsely reported. Results concerning stool frequency and continence vary widely. These variations may represent several areas of bias, but one of the main concerns is study design. Many studies are focused on physiological results and even when a control population is included in the study design, it is not used to compare the clinical functional outcome. the aims of this prospective study were: (1) to study serially before and 1 year after low anterior resection for carcinoma the changes in clinical function; and (2) to study if these changes could be attributable to the characteristics of the population, comparing the results with sex-matched and age-matched controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sample size was previously established according the prevalence of continence disorders fund in two previous studies carried out in our country, 36% for anterior resection, and 6% among general population in our community. Thirty-eight consecutive patients (mean age 63.9 years, range 41-77 years) with a diagnosis of rectal carcinoma were invited to participate in the study. The lower margin of the tumor was located between 4 and 15 cm from the anal margin (median of level tumor 6.0 cm). A control group of 25 volunteers matched for sex and age with patients who were questioned 1 year after the anterior resection were also studied. Median level of anastomosis was 6.2 +/- 2.7 cm (range 2-11) above the anal margin. In six patients with an anastomosis less than 4 cm from the anal margin, a loop ileostomy was constructed and closed 3 months later. Patients were interviewed by a research assistant before and 1 year after operation or 1 year after closure of the temporary defunctioning loop ileostomy. Patients were questioned about bowel frequency over 24 h, urgency, tenesmus, erratic defecatory patterns, discrimination of bowel content and continence. RESULTS: Clinical function of patients before and after operation. Compared with pre-operative, bowel frequency of 3.9/day (range 0.3-14) did not differ significantly 1 year after operation at 2.3/day (range 0.5-6). Frequency of erratic defecatory patterns (44%), urgency (40%) and obstructed defecation (20%) did not differ between the preoperative and postoperative period. Forty-eight percent of patients suffered tenesmus and 20% were unable to discriminate between flatus and feces before operation, whereas these troublesome symptoms were present in 24% and 16%, respectively, after the operation. Before the operation 32% of patients reported fecal leaks while in the postoperative period 52% patients complained of this alteration. Clinical function of patients compared with controls. Patients had a mean stool frequency per day of 2.3 (range 0.5-6) and controls 1.3 (range 0.3-5). Forty-four percent of patients had erratic defecatory patterns, 24% suffered tenesmus and 40% urgency, whereas these troublesome symptoms were present in 12% in the control population. Moreover, obstructed defecation was present in 20% and 4%, respectively. All controls and 84% of patients maintained discrimination of flatus, liquid and solid feces. Fifty-two percent of patients and 8% of controls suffered from altered continence. CONCLUSIONS: One year after low anterior resection patients had poor bowel function when compared with a control population of the same age and sex. A distinct anterior resection syndrome exists consisting of increased bowel frequency, erratic defecatory patterns, urgency, tenesmus, obstructed defecation, and minor fecal leakage. Furthermore, these disturbances in defecatory function did not differ significantly from symptoms produced by the rectal carcinoma, and patients experienced no major benefit from surgery from a functional point of view.     

New treatment for ileal pouch-anal or coloanal anastomotic stenosis

Persistent anastomotic stricture following ileal pouch-anal or coloanal anastomoses can be treated by transanal resection using a stapler or a more complex procedure, such as transanal pouch advancement with neoanastomosis. We propose an easier and faster technique, which does not require any particular device. Its long-term functional results are satisfactory in most patients.     

The functional results of abdomino-anal resection of the rectum with the formation of a reservoir from the large intestine

Under study were clinical and functional results of 27 patients aged 36 to 68 years with adenocarcinoma (pT2-T3) of the ampullar part of the rectum who were submitted to abdomino-anal resection with the formation of J-shaped colonic reservoir. In the nearest postoperative period partial incompetence of the coloanal anastomosis, necrosis of the reservoir wall and its inflammation appeared in 4 patients. In 6 months after closure of the protective transversostomy full continence was noted in 24 patients. In 3 patients only there was a periodic incontinence of liquid stools and flatus. The formation of J-shaped colonic reservoir in patients requiring the formation of low colorectal or coloanal anastomoses gives considerably better functional results of total resection of the rectum.     

Posterior sagittal resection for rectal aganglionosis: preliminary results of a new approach

BACKGROUND: There is no general agreement about how patients who have short-segment Hirschsprung's disease should be treated. METHODS: Ten patients with Hirschsprung's disease, seven with rectal and three with rectosigmoidal aganglionosis, were operated on through a posterior sagittal incision. In nine patients, a primary rectal resection and coloanal anastomosis was performed. In one patient, a longitudinal posterior myectomy of the rectum was performed as a primary procedure, but the procedure was eventually converted to a rectal resection and coloanal anastomosis through the same incision. RESULTS: One early and one late anastomotic complication occurred. Both were successfully treated with a temporary fecal diversion (left-sided colostomy for 6 to 8 weeks). The functional results as evaluated with anorectal manometry were similar to a group of Hirschsprung's patients treated with transabdominal pull-through resection and coloanal anastomosis. CONCLUSION: This approach might prove to be a useful alternative both to the transabdominal resection and the posterior longitudinal rectal myectomy in Hirschsprung's disease with rectal aganglionosis.     

Ileorectal anastomosis: results of surgical treatment and evaluation of the intestinal function

Ileo-rectal anastomosis was performed in 30 patients. Indication for surgery was ulcerative colitis in 12, cancer of colon in 10 and megacolon in 6. Mean age of patients was 47.8 years with an even sex distribution. Ileo-rectal anastomosis was performed simultaneously with total colectomy in elective patients (n = 18) and at a second stage, following transient terminal ileostomy in emergency cases (n = 12). An overall morbidity of 26% was observed: wound infection developed in 13%, prolonged ileus in 7%, intraabdominal abscess in 3% and fistula of the anastomosis in 3%. There was no mortality. After a mean follow up of 36 months there was no instance of incontinence, average number of daily intestinal evacuations was 2.4 (somewhat higher for patients with ulcerative colitis: 2.6 vs 2.1). We conclude that ileo-rectal anastomosis is a safe procedure with adequate functional results.     

Mapping protein-ligand interactions by footprinting, a radical idea

PURPOSE: This study investigated the functional significance of perineal complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: Review of a prospective registry of 628 patients was undertaken. Bowel function was assessed by detailed functional questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-squared and Fisher's exact probability tests. RESULTS: Of 628 patients, 153 (24.4 percent) had 171 perineal complications. The 277 control patients had no complications. Complications included 66 (10.5 percent) anastomotic strictures, 28 (4.5 percent) anastomotic separations, 36 (5.7 percent) pouch fistulas, 41 (6.5 percent) episodes of pelvic sepsis, and 18 (2.9 percent) patients with multiple complications. After these complications were addressed, the pouch failure rate was low (10 percent); in 90 percent of patients, the pouch could be salvaged. Most pouch failures were the result of pouch fistulas, and most occurred in patients ultimately diagnosed with Crohn's disease. Functional results after cure of these perineal complications revealed no significant functional differences between control patients and those cured of anastomotic separations, anastomotic strictures, and pouch fistulas. Only a few minor differences were demonstrated in function after an episode of pelvic sepsis. The major deterioration in function occurred after treatment for multiple perineal complications. CONCLUSIONS: An appreciable number of perineal complications occur after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Pouch-perineal fistulas are associated with the highest pouch failure rate. The majority of these fistulas occur in patients ultimately diagnosed with Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis. Although there is no substitute for good technique and sound clinical judgment in the success of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, if perineal complications are successfully treated, functional outcome is equivalent to that in patients without perineal complications.     

Bursting pressure in anastomotic healing in experimentally induced colitis in rats

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies on healing of colonic anastomosis have been thoroughly investigated. However, clinical parameters of the healing process of anastomosis in the inflamed colon has not yet been reported. METHODS: In the present study, healing of anastomosis in trinitrobenzene-sulfonic acid-induced colitis in rats was assessed by measuring the bursting pressure and bursting wall tension. RESULTS: On postoperative day 4, bursting pressure and bursting wall tension were significantly lower (P < 0.001) in rats with colitis with or without anastomosis and normal colon with anastomosis, compared with normal colon without anastomosis. On postoperative day 7, bursting pressure and bursting wall tension of normal colon with anastomosis approached that of normal colon without anastomosis. However, bursting pressure and bursting wall tension of rats with colitis with or without anastomosis remained significantly lower (P < 0.001) than the latter. Furthermore, unlike rats without colitis in which perforation occurred mostly at the anastomotic line, the bursting site in colitic rats was predominantly away from the anastomotic line. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in surgery for inflammatory bowel disease, it is the adjoining inflamed bowel wall that is vulnerable to be perforated in response to increasing intraluminal pressure rather than the anastomosis that is braced by the sutures.     

Determinants of pouch function after continence-preserving proctocolectomy

A prospective study was undertaken in 17 patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (13 patients) or familial adenomatous polyposis (4 patients) to determine relationship between pre- and postoperative anal sphincter function, pouch characteristics and functional results. Postoperatively all manometric parameters were significantly reduced and remained so permanently. Only squeeze pressure rose to normal values again. The most important factor for a favourable functional outcome was pouch volume. A capacious reservoir was associated with a low stool frequency, low risk of incontinence and general success of the operation, as assessed subjectively. Perianal soreness with considerable skin problems occurred frequently when resting and squeeze pressures were markedly reduced postoperatively.     

Radiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: normal findings, examination pitfalls, and complications

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a procedure in which an ileal reservoir is constructed after total colectomy and anastomosed to the anus. IPAA is a well-established option for patients who require surgery for chronic ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Although excellent functional results can be achieved with IPAA, the procedure is associated with an appreciable number of complications, including small bowel obstruction, pouch fistula, anastomotic separation, anastomotic leakage, pelvic infection and abscess, stricture, and pouchitis. However, most of these complications do not require surgical intervention and can be managed with aggressive medical treatment and delay of ileostomy closure. Radiography of the IPAA pouch is routinely performed before closure of the diverting ileostomy to evaluate the integrity of the pouch and anastomosis. Such radiography can demonstrate many of the complications of IPAA, thus allowing identification of patients who may require intervention or delay before closure of the ileostomy.