The comparative effect of a mixed urea,ammonium nitrate,ammonium sulphate granular formulation on the efficiency of N recovery by perennial ryegrass

The¹⁵N isotope was used to study the mode of action of individual nitrogen sources in a 30% urea:30% ammonium nitrate: 10% ammonium sulphate:30% filler (w/w) granular fertilizer for perennial ryegrass in a greenhouse pot experiment. The fertilizer consisted of two types of granules, one containing 80% urea and 20% filler and the second containing 48% ammonium nitrate (AN), 16% ammonium sulphate (AS) and 36% filler. In addition the effect of dolomite compared with silica as the filler was investigated on nitrogen recovery from the 30:30:10:30 formulation.Dolomite adversely affected the recovery of nitrate N from the system and evidence suggested that MgCO₃ was the active component. Granules containing dolomite resulted in a lower dry-matter yield than those containing silica, however the difference was not significant as nitrate contributed only 20% of the N in the formulation. AN gave the greatest DM yield and urea the lowest with AS being intermediate. The¹⁵N budget in shoots, roots and soil indicated that only 65% of the N from urea was recovered at the end of the experiment compared with 86% for AN and 91% for AS. The dry-matter yield of the 30:30:10:30 formulation using silica as the filler was intermediate between urea and AN; however, the apparent N recovery was significantly higher than expected from the sum of the individual components. The use of¹⁵N labelling indicated that using separate granules for ammonium N and urea the recovery of urea was improved by 11% in the triple N mixture when both AN and AS were present in the second granule compared to the recovery on its own. The enhanced recovery of urea appeared to be a function of AN and AS acting together as neither source in double combination with urea had any effect on urea N recovery.Urea enhanced the recovery of nitrate N by 10% but decreased the recovery of AS by 6% (in the 30:30:10:30 formulation) in comparison with the single sources on their own. The results indicate that interactions can occur between N sources even when they are physically separated by being in different granules.     

An assessment of granular urea/ammonium sulphate and urea/potassium nitrate fertilizers on nitrogen recovery by ryegrass

The comparative effects of ammonium sulphate (AS), potassium nitrate (KNO₃), urea (U) or combined 1:1 (w/w) U/KNO₃, U/AS granular products were investigated on dry matter (DM) yield and¹⁵N utilisation by perennial ryegrass grown under controlled environmental conditions.The DM yield and apparent N recovery with the single N sources was in the order KNO₃ > AS > U. The¹⁵N budget in shoots, roots and soil indicated that only 55% of the urea N was recovered at the end of the experiment compared with 87% and 86% for AS and KNO₃ respectively. The DM yield and apparent N recovery from the combined U/AS source was significantly higher than would be expected (P < 0.01) based on the proportions of each N source in the mixture. Differentially labelling the U and AS with¹⁵N indicated that AS enhanced the shoot % utilisation of urea by 38% (P < 0.001) whereas urea reduced the shoot % utilisation of AS by 14% (P < 0.01). These results indicate that an interaction occurred between U and AS when combined in a 1:1 (w/w) ratio in the same pellet.     

A microplot study of the fate of15N-labelled ammonium nitrate and urea applied at two rates to ryegrass in spring

Confined microplots were used to study the fate of¹⁵N-labelled ammonium nitrate and urea when applied to ryegrass in spring at 3 lowland sites (S1, S2 and S3). Urea and differentially and doubly labelled ammonium nitrate were applied at 50 and 100 kg N ha^–1. The % utilization of the¹⁵N-labelled fertilizer was measured in 3 cuts of herbage and in soil to a depth of 15 cm (soil_0–15).Over all rates, forms and sites, the % utilization values for cuts 1, 2, 3 and soil_0–15 were 52.4, 5.3, 2.4 and 16.0% respectively. The % utilization of¹⁵N in herbage varied little as the rate of application increased but the % utilization in the soil_0–15 decreased as the rate of application increased. The total % utilization values in herbage plus soil_0–15 indicated that losses of N increased from 12 to 25 kg N ha^–1 as the rate of N application was increased from 50 to 100 kg N ha^–1.The total % utilization values in herbage plus soil_0–15 over both rates of fertilizer N application were 84.1, 80.8 and 81.0% for urea compared with 74.9, 72.5 and 74.4% for all ammonium nitrate forms at S1, S2 and S3 respectively. Within ammonium nitrate forms, the total % utilization values in herbage plus soil_0–15 over both rates and all sites were 76.7, 69.4 and 75.7% for¹⁵NH₄NO₃, NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ and¹⁵NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ respectively. The utilization of the nitrate moiety of ammonium nitrate was lower than the utilization of the ammonium moiety.The distribution of labelled fertilizer between herbage and soil_0–15 varied with soil type. As the total utilization of labelled fertilizer was similar at all sites the cumulative losses due to denitrification and downward movement appeared to account for approximately equal amounts of N at each site.     

Fate of Fertilizer15N applied as urea and ammonium sulphate in opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) grown under greenhouse conditions

Laboratory incubation and greenhouse experiments were conducted to investigate the comparative effectiveness of urea and ammonium sulphate in opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) using¹⁵N dilution techniques. Fertilizer treatments were control (no N), 600 mg N pot^–1 and 1200 mg N pot^–1 (12 kg oven dry soil) applied as aqueous solution of urea or ammonium sulphate. Fertilizer rates, under laboratory incubation study were similar to that under greenhouse conditions. A fertilizer¹⁵N balance sheet reveals that N recovery by plants was 28–39% with urea and 35–45% with ammonium sulphate. Total recovery of¹⁵N in soil-plant system was 77–82% in urea. The corresponding estimates for ammonium sulphate were 89–91%. Consequently the unaccounted fertilizer N was higher under urea (18–23%) as compared to that in ammonium sulphate (9–11%). The soil pH increased from 8.2 to 9.4 with urea whereas in ammonium sulphate treated soil pH decreased to 7.3 during 30 days after fertilizer application. The rate of NH₃ volatilization, measured under laboratory conditions, was higher with urea as compared to the same level of ammonium sulphate. The changes in pH of soil followed the identical trend both under laboratory and greenhouse conditions.     

Nitrogen use efficiency,floodwater properties,and nitrogen-15 balance in transplanted lowland rice as affected by liquid urea band placement

Alternative N fertilizer management practices are needed to increase productivity and N use efficiency in lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.). In 1986 dry season, a field study using¹⁵N-labeled urea evaluated the effect of time and method of fertilizer N application on grain yield and N use efficiency. Conventional fertilizer application was compared with band placement of liquid urea and point placement of urea supergranules (USG). Grain yields were significantly higher with either band or point placement than with broadcast and incorporation or surface application. Partial pressure of NH₃ (NH₃) was significantly reduced when N was deep-placed.¹⁵N balance data show that fertilizer N applied basally and incorporated gave a total¹⁵N recovery of 52% and crop (grain + straw) recovery of 30%. Band placement of liquid urea N resulted in 82–90% total and 57–65% crop¹⁵N recovery. USG point placement gave 94% total and 70% crop¹⁵N recovery. Deep placement of second N application gave only slightly higher (98%)¹⁵N recovery compared with broadcast application (89%).     

Effect of lime nitrogen on the efficiency of urea and other ammonium nitrogen fertilizers

Five pot experiments were conducted with wheat and rice in a net house to study the effect of lime nitrogen (LN, contains about 55% calcium cyanamide) amendment rates on the efficiency of urea, the recovery urea-¹⁵N, the efficiency of the three nitrogen fertilizers(NF), on the efficiency of urea in the three soils, and on NO ₃ ^- -N leaching from a flooded soil. A rate of LN-N of 5–8% of applied fertilizer N increased the recovery of labeled urea-N by 9.42%. The effect of LN on the efficiency of NF was urea > ammonium sulfate > ammonium chloride. Under flooded conditions, LN decreased NO ₃ ^- formation and leaching.Responses of several crops to LN amended fertilizers were also studied in field experiments. At equal NPK applications, the efficiency of basal applications to rice, wheat, corn, potatoes, soybean, peanut, grapes, peaches, melon and watermelon were bette r with LN than without. Efficiency with a basal fertilizer for rice or wheat with LN were the same as with the same fertilizer without LN applied in split applications.     

Fate of nitrogen applied in different fertilizers to the surface of a calcareous soil in Syria

¹⁵N-labelled ammonium sulphate or¹⁵N-labelled urea were each applied in solutionat a rate of 30 kg N ha^-1 to the surface of 20soil cores (52 mm internal diameter × 100 mm deep)located on a field experiment at the ICARDA station,Tel Hadya, Syria. Recovery of ¹⁵N-label in theammonium, nitrate, organic and/or urea-N pools in thesoil was measured on days 0, 1, 2, 5 and 13 afterapplication. Total recovery of ¹⁵N was initially100%, but by day 13 after application it had declinedto 51% with urea and 73% with ammonium sulphate.Ammonium nitrate labelled either as ammonium or asnitrate was also applied to the soil surface of 8other cores at the same time. ¹⁵N recovery in thefour soil N pools was measured only on day 12 afterapplication. Total recovery of ¹⁵N-label was 75%with labelled ammonium and 57% with labelled nitrate.Volatilization of ammonia from this calcareous soil(pH 8.1) is one probable mechanism of N loss fromammonium and urea fertilizers: with nitrate bothleaching beyond the base of the core (i.e. 100 mm) and denitrification were responsible for Nlosses. These large losses of N immediately afterapplication have implications for fertilizermanagement practices.     

Slow-release urea fertilizers — effect on floodwater chemistry,ammonia volatilization and rice growth in an alkali soil

In experiments with transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) at the Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, India, two methods of application of granular urea, wholly as basal dose U(W) or in splits U(S) were compared with deep, point placement (8 cm) of urea supergranules and broadcast application of two slow-release sources, sulphur-coated urea (SCU) and lac-coated urea (LCU). Comparisons were made in wet season 1984 and 1985 on the basis of ammoniacal N concentration and pH of floodwater, ammonia volatilization, rice yield and N uptake.In 1984 the highest peak concentrations of ammoniacal N (AN) in the floodwater, > 12g m^–3, and ammonia volatilization losses 54% of applied N were produced in U(W). Application of N in splits U(S) reduced peak AN levels 5g m^–3 and losses to 45.1%. LCU was ineffective in reducing peak AN levels ( 7.5g m^–3) or losses (43.6%). However SCU and USG were effective in reducing peak AN levels to < 2g m^–3 and N losses to 16.9 and 3.4% respectively. Total ammonia volatilization losses as well as the initial rate of loss correlated very well with the peak levels (second day) of AN, NH₃ (aq.) as well as equilibrium vapour pressure of NH₃. Floodwater pH was between 9.5 and 10.0.Split application of granular urea was generally more efficient in terms of yield and N recovery (41.4%, average of two years) as compared to whole application (29.5%). LCU was ineffective in improving grain yields or N recovery (30.9%). SCU was ineffective in improving grain yields but improved N recovery to 57.9%., USG increased grain yields only in first year by 19% over U(S) and improved N uptake to 60.5%. A negative linear relationship was established between N uptake by rice at harvest and AN levels in floodwater two days after fertilization which can be used as an index to evaluate fertilizers.     

Effect of phenyl phosphorodiamidate on the fate of urea applied to wetland rice fields

The effect of phenyl phosphorodiamidate (PPD) on floodwater properties, N uptake,¹⁵N recovery, and grain yield of wetland rice (Oryza sativa L.) was evaluated in a series of field studies conducted at Muñoz and Los Baños, Philippines. Prilled urea and PPD-amended urea were applied to soil and incorporated immediately prior to transplanting or applied to floodwater after transplanting. Urea was also deep-placed or added in a coated form in two studies.The addition of PPD with urea retarded urea hydrolysis by 1–3 days, depending on the time and method of application. Significant reductions in the concentration of ammoniacal-N in floodwater resulted when PPD-amended urea was applied between 18 and 26 days after transplanting (DT). In contrast, PPD did not appreciably affect the concentration of ammoniacal-N in floodwater when applied with urea either immediately before or after transplanting of the seedlings.Plant N uptake and grain yield were not significantly affected by the addition of PPD with urea in three of the four experiments conducted, even though PPD substantially reduced the concentration of ammoniacal-N in the floodwater in several treatments in these studies. The¹⁵N balance studies conducted at both field locations showed PPD to increase total¹⁵N recovery by between 10% and 14% of the¹⁵N applied, 14 days after the application of urea. No further loss of¹⁵N occurred between the initial sampling (40 DT) and grain harvest at Los Baños. An increase in¹⁵N recovery occurred at grain harvest at Muñoz because¹⁵N-labeled urea was applied at 50 DT in the study. PPD increased the amount of¹⁵N in the plant and nonexchangeable soil N fraction at all harvests at Los Baños. In contrast, at Muñoz, PPD increased the quantity of¹⁵N in the KCL-extractable pool 14 days after urea was applied. Reasons for the discrepancies in results between experiments and the overall failure of PPD to increase grain yield are discussed.     

Recovery of15N from ammonium nitrate and algal biomass-amended soil

A greenhouse experiment was conducted to compare the effectiveness of blue-green algae (Anabaena flos aquae) produced in a simulated inorganic-wastewater medium and NH₄NO₃ as sources of N for bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.) on a Decatur silt loam soil (clayey, kaolinitic, thermic Rhodic Paleudult).¹⁵N-labeled blue-green algae and¹⁵N-labeled NH₄NO₃ were used as N sources to supply up to 300 mg N per pot (3 kg of soil). Bermudagrass was clipped at 42, 63, and 102 d after planting and dry matter yield, total, and¹⁵N were determined at each clipping. Results indicated a highly significant increase in total dry matter (shoots and roots) and N uptake over the control for both algae and NH₄NO₃ treatments at all N rates. There were no significant effects of N source on bermudagrass yields, but total N uptake was significantly higher with NH₄NO₃. The net mineralization of N from blue-green algal biomass ranged from 36 to 59% of the total N applied and the corresponding net release for NH₄NO₃ ranged from 65 to 86%. From 29 to 54% of the total N applied as blue-green algal biomass and from 50 to 75% of the N applied as NH₄NO₃ were assimilated by bermudagrass plants. For N rates above 100 mg N pot^–1, higher proportions of the labeled N in the shoots of the third harvest were derived from algal biomass than from NH₄NO₃. A large portion of the labeled N remained undecomposed or immobilized in the algae treated soil (41–64%) as compared to NH₄NO₃ treated soil (14–35%). More loss of N occurred in the NH₄NO₃ treatments from 3 to 15%, while the corresponding figures for algae treated soil were 2 to 8%.     

Nitrogen utilization by lowland rice as affected by fertilization with urea and green manure

Field studies were conducted during two consecutive wet seasons in flooded rice (Oryza sativa L.) to determine the effect of green manure on urea utilization in a rice-fallow-rice cropping sequence. Replicated plots were fertilized with 60 to 120 kg of urea N ha^–1 in three split applications (50, 25 and 25%) with or without incorporation of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata L.) (100 kg N ha^–1). During the first crop only 31 to 44% of the urea added was used by the rice. Incorporatingin situ grown dhaincha (GM) into the soil at transplanting had little effect on urea utilization. Forty-four to 54% of the N added was not recovered in the soil, rice crop, or as nitrate leachate during the first cropping season. Incorporation of GM had no effect on fertilizer N recovery. Only about 2% of the urea N added to the first rice crop was taken up by the second rice crop and, as in the first crop, the GM had little effect on residual N, either in amount or utilization.     

Efficiency of urea and ammonium sulfate for wetland rice grown on an acid sulfate soil as affected by rate and time of application

A pot experiment was conducted in a greenhouse to assess the effect of rate and time of N application on yield and N uptake of wetland rice grown on a Rangsit acid sulfate soil (Sulfic Tropaquepts). Response of rice at N rates of 800, 1600 and 2400 mg N/pot (5 kg of soil) was compared between urea and ammonium sulfate when applied at two times: (i) full-rate basal at transplanting and (ii) one half at transplanting and one half at the PI stage. In addition, labelled¹⁵N sources were applied either at transplanting or at the PI stage to determine the nitrogen balance sheet in the soil/plant system.No significant difference in grain and straw yields between urea and ammonium sulfate at low rate was observed. At the higher N rates, urea produced higher yields than did ammonium sulfate regardless of timing. The highest yields were obtained when urea at the high N rate was applied either in a single dose or a split dose while lowest yields were observed particularly when ammonium sulfate at the same rate was applied. Split application of N fertilizer was shown to be no better than a single basal application. The occurrence of nutritional disorder, a symptom likely reflected by high concentration of Fe (II) in combination with soluble Al, was induced with high rate of ammonium sulfate.In terms of fertilizer N recovery by using¹⁵N-labelling, ammonium sulfate was more efficient than urea when both were applied at transplanting. In contrast, application at the PI stage resulted in higher utilization of urea than of ammonium sulfate. The recovery of labelled N in the soil was higher with urea than with ammonium sulfate when the two sources were applied at transplanting, while the opposite result was obtained when the same fertilizers were applied at the PI stage. The losses from urea and ammonium sulfate were not different when these fertilizers were applied at transplanting but loss from urea was higher than that from ammonium sulfate when both were applied at the PI stage.     

Effect of encapsulated calcium carbide and urea application methods on denitrification and N loss from flooded rice

Poor N fertilizer use efficiency by flooded rice is caused by gaseous losses of N. Improved fertilizer management and use of nitrification inhibitors may reduce N losses. A microplot study using¹⁵N-labelled urea was conducted to investigate the effects of fertilizer application method (urea broadcast, incorporated, deep-placed) and nitrification inhibitor [encapsulated calcium carbide (ECC)] treatments on emission of N₂+N₂0 and total loss of applied N on a grey clay near Griffith, NSW, Australia. Both incorporation and deep placement of urea decreased N₂+N₂O emission compared to urea broadcast into the floodwater. Addition of ECC significantly (P < 0.05) reduced emission of N₂+N₂0 from incorporated or deep-placed urea and resulted in increased exchangeable ammonium concentrations in the soil in both treatments. Fifty percent of the applied N was lost when urea was broadcast into the floodwater. Total N loss from the applied N was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced when urea was either incorporated or deep placed. In the presence of ECC the losses were reduced further and the lowest loss (34.2% of the applied N) was noted when urea was deep-placed with ECC.     

Influence of urea fertiliser formulation, urease inhibitor and season on ammonia loss from ryegrass

This paper reports the results of experiments to determine whether ammonia (NH₃) loss can be reduced and nitrogen (N) use efficiency improved by using two relatively new commercial urea formulations rather than granular urea and urea ammonium nitrate. Four nitrogen treatments were applied at a rate of 40 kg N ha^?1: granular urea, ‘Green Urea? 14’ [containing 45.8 % N as urea and ‘Agrotain^®’ (N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide) @ 5 L t^?1 of urea as a urease inhibitor], ‘Nhance’, a fine particle spray [containing 46 % N as urea, ‘Agrotain’ @ 1 L t^?1 of urea and gibberellic acid (applied at a rate of 10 g ha^?1)] and urea ammonium nitrate in solution (UAN) surface applied. Ammonia loss was determined in autumn and spring using a micrometeorological method. In autumn, use of the Green Urea and Nhance reduced NH₃ loss from the 30 % of applied N lost from the granular urea to 9 and 23 % respectively. Loss from all treatments in spring was very small (<2 % of applied N), because 4 mm of rain fell within 24 h of application onto an already wet site. The use of the Nhance and Green Urea instead of granular urea did not result in increased agronomic efficiency or recovery efficiency of the applied N, and this is most likely due to the presence of sufficient available N from both fertiliser application and the soil. A ¹⁵N study recovered 72.8 % of the applied N in the plants and soil, and showed that 30 % of the total N taken up by the plant was derived from the fertiliser, and 70 % from the soil.     

Urease activity and inhibition in flooded soil systems

Ammonia volatilization is an important mechanism of N loss from flooded rice soils. Inhibition of urease may delay the formation of conditions favorable to NH₃ volatilization in the floodwater, thus giving the soil and plant a better chance to compete with the atmosphere as a sink for N. The experiments reported here were designed to identify the site of urea hydrolysis in flooded soils and to attempt selective urease inhibition with some of the inhibitors reported in the literature.Studies with three flooded soils using¹⁵N-labeled urea showed that 50–60% of the urea was found in the floodwater, despite incorporation. This floodwater urea is hydrolyzed largely at the soil—floodwater interface and subsequently returns to the floodwater (> 80%) or is retained by the soil (< 20%). Of the following urease inhibitors (K-ethyl-xanthate; 3 amino-1-H-1, 2, 4-triazole; phenylphosphorodiamidate) added at 2% (w/w of urea), only the latter was able to delay the appearance of NH₃ (aq) in the flood-water and thus delay NH₃ volatilization. Use of an algicide addition to the floodwater depressed NH₃ (aq) levels during the entire period studied, but in the presence of PPD the algicide had little additional effect.     

Effect of urea management on yield and N use efficiency of lowland rice on an acid sulfate soil

Field experiments were conducted during 1988–1989 at two adjacent sites on an acid sulfate soil (Sulfic Tropaquept) in Thailand to determine the influence of urea fertilization practices on lowland rice yield and N use efficiency. Almost all the unhydrolyzed urea completely disappeared from the floodwater within 8 to 10 d following urea application. A maximum partial pressure of ammonia (pNH₃) value of 0.14 Pa and an elevation in floodwater pH to about 7.5 following urea application suggest that appreciable loss of NH₃ could occur from this soil if wind speeds were favorable. Grain yields and N uptake were significantly increased with applied N over the control and affected by urea fertilization practices (4.7–5.7 Mg ha^–1 in dry season and 3.0–4.1 Mg ha^–1 in wet season). In terms of both grain yield and N uptake, incorporation treatments of urea as well as urea broadcasting onto drained soil followed by flooding 2 d later were more effective than the treatments in which the same fertilizer was broadcast directly into the floodwater either shortly or 10 d after transplanting (DT). The¹⁵N balance studies conducted in the wet season showed that N losses could be reduced to 31% of applied N by broadcasting of urea onto drained soil and flooding 2 d later compared with 52% loss by broadcasting of urea into floodwater at 10 DT. Gaseous N loss via NH₃ volatilization was probably responsible for the poor efficiency of broadcast urea in this study.     

Ammonia volatilization from point-placed urea in upland,sandy soils

The upland fertilization practice in Africa of placing N fertilizer below the soil surface near the plant might be facilitated through use of urea supergranules (USG). Since little is known about N losses from point-placed urea on light-textured African soils, laboratory studies were conducted in a forced-draft system to determine (a) the influence of soil properties on ammonia loss from USG and (b) to compare N loss from USG with that from broadcast N sources. Ammonia loss from 1.1 g USG placed at a 4-cm soil depth ranged from 2.9 to 62% of the added N on six light-textured soils. Ammonia loss was correlated with soil clay content (r = –0.93^**) but not with pH. A more detailed study on a soil from Niger revealed significantly less ammonia loss from either surfaced applied urea (18%) or surface-applied calcium ammonium nitrate (7%) than from USG placed at a 4-cm depth (67%). Amendment of surface-applied urea with 1.7% phenyl phosphorodiamidate (PPD), a urease inhibitor, essentially eliminated ammonia loss (1.9%). An¹⁵N balance confirmed that ammonia volatilization was the major loss mechanism for all N sources. The results suggest that point-placed urea may be prone to ammonia volatilization loss on light-textured African soils moistened by frequent light rainfall. In such cases, broadcast application of urea, CAN, or urea amended with PPD may be less prone to N loss.     

The effect of autumn applied 15N-labelled fertilizer on nitrate leaching in a cultivated soil during winter

Nitrogen (N) fertilizer applied in autumn to arable farm land raises concerns over affects on ground water quality. The contribution of autumn ¹⁵N-labelled fertilizer (50 kg N ha^-1) to nitrate leaching losses from a cultivated soil (silt loam on sandy loam; Udic Ustochrept) was measured using undisturbed monolith lysimeters (500 mm diameter, 700 mm long) during consecutive winters in Canterbury, New Zealand. The addition of ¹⁵N-labelled fertilizer at 50 kg N ha^-1 did not significantly increase nitrate leaching losses. Soil-derived-N contributed 78 and 88% (1996 and 1997, respectively) of the nitrate leached beneath fertilized lysimeters. Warmer weather and wetter soil conditions at cultivation and fertilizer application during 1997, compared with 1996, resulted in an increased release of soil-derived-N in 1997. Nitrate leaching and average nitrate concentrations were therefore 41% and 56% higher, respectively, during the winter of 1997 than the winter of 1996. However, fertilizer leaching losses were relatively consistent between years (7.8 and 8.6%). Although not statistically significant, total N leaching losses and average nitrate concentration were 24 to 30% higher below fertilized lysimeters as compared with unfertilized lysimeters, indicating a priming effect of fertilizer on soil N release. During both late winter periods, leachate nitrate concentrations from fertilized and unfertilized lysimeters exceeded World Health Organisation (WHO) limits for drinking water. Higher release of soil-derived-N in 1997 also meant WHO limits were exceeded for 6 weeks longer than in 1996. In conclusion, the application of ¹⁵N fertilizer in autumn directly contributed only a small proportion of the total amount of N leached in this cultivated soil. However, the apparent priming effect of autumn applied-N fertilizer has importance on the overall environmental impact of this production system, as the amount of N leached, and extent to which health limits were exceeded, was largely determined by the factors which controlled the release of soil-derived-N.     

The effect of plant residues on plant uptake and leaching of soil and fertilizer nitrogen in a tropical red earth soil

Two field experiments, in which differing amounts and types of plant residues were incorporated into a red earth soil, were conducted at Katherine, N.T., Australia. The aim of the work was to evaluate the effect of the residues on uptake of soil and fertilizer N by a subsequent sorghum crop, on the accumulation and leaching of nitrate, and on losses of N.Stubble of grain sorghum applied at an exceptionally high rate (~ 18 000 kg ha^–1) reduced uptake of N by sorghum by 13% and depressed the accumulation of nitrate under a crop and particularly under a fallow.Loss of fertilizer N, movement of nitrate down the profile, and uptake by the crop was studied in another experiment after application of N as¹⁵NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ to field microplots. By four weeks after fertilizer application 14% had been lost from the soil-plant system and by crop maturity 36 per cent had been lost. The pattern of¹⁵N distribution in the profile suggested that losses below 150 cm had occurred during crop growth. The recovery of¹⁵N by the crop alone ranged from 16 to 32 per cent. There was an apparent loss of N from the crop between anthesis and maturity. Residue levels common to sorghum crops in the region (~ 2000 kg ha^–1) did not significantly affect uptake by a subsequent sorghum crop, N losses, or distribution of nitrate in the profile.     

Recovery of15N-labelled urea: Influence of zero tillage,and time and method of application

The availability of N fertilizer to the crops under zero tillage versus conventional tillage may be affected by position of applied N, N immobilization and N loss from soil. The objectives of this study was to determine the influence of tillage, time of application and method of placement on the recovery of¹⁵N-labelled urea in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) plants and in soil. Field experiments were conducted during 1984–85 at two locations (Rimbey and Ellerslie) in north-central Alberta. The lowest N recovery in barley plants occurred with surface broadcasting on zero tillage or with incorporation on conventional tillage. Placing urea in bands (23 or 46 cm lateral spacing) or nests (at poits 23 or 46 cm apart) increased the plant N recovery substantially. The plant N recovery was markedly lower with fall application than spring-applied N. For spring broadcast application, the N recovery in the plant was lower under zero tillage than conventional tillage. The¹⁵N recovery in soil (immobilized N) at harvest was greater with broadcast compared to bands or nests, and immobilized N was much greater with fall rather than spring application. The ratios of recoveries of¹⁵N in plant:soil with banding or nesting tended to be higher on zero tillage compared to conventional tillage. In all, placing urea in bands or nests increased the recovery of applied N in plants and decreased the amount of immobilized N under both zero and conventional tillage. The plant N recovery was inferior with fall application, but less so with bands or nests on zero tillage.(Scientific Paper No. 647)