Low molecular weight heparin: a critical analysis of clinical trials

LMWHs are an important new class of antithrombotic agents. They differ from UFH in having relatively more anti-Xa activity, greater bioavailability at low doses, longer half-life, and more predictable anticoagulant response when administered in fixed doses. These properties allow LMWHs to be administered QD or at most BID and without laboratory monitoring. The incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia also appears to be lower with an LMWH than with heparin. Given their favorable pharmacological profile, it was of interest to critically appraise clinical trials of thromboprophylaxis and treatment with these new agents. In orthopedic trials, it was noted that LMWH provided safe and effective thromboprophylaxis for patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery of the lower limb. In those having hip arthroplasty, LMWH was as effective as low-intensity warfarin therapy, but its use was associated with more wound hematomas. In those having total knee arthroplasty, LMWH was more effective than warfarin and did not increase bleeding. However, the prevalence of DVTs complicating this procedure as well as acute hip fracture remains unacceptably high, and additional studies of LMWH in combination with other prophylactic methods, such as external pneumatic compression, are needed. Only one adequately designed trial found less bleeding resulted from LMWH prophylaxis administered at an equivalent antithrombotic dose to UFH. In general medical patients, LMWH appeared to be as effective as UFH and had the advantages of less frequent injections and fewer injection site hematomas. In general surgical patients, there was a lower risk of thromboembolism but a trend toward an increase in bleeding events. Subjects with strokes and spinal cord injuries benefited from fewer thrombotic events, and the latter had fewer bleeding complications. Other potential indications for LMWH, such as cardiopulmonary bypass, hemodialysis, and preservation of graft patency, are presently under study. Perhaps the most impressive benefits of LMWH will be realized when it is used for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. The meta-analysis presented in this review showed a trend toward greater efficacy with LMWH and fewer major bleeding events in comparison with adjusted-dose intravenous UFH. Also, during the months following the thrombotic event, there was significantly less mortality in patients receiving LMWH. A further advantage was the subcutaneous route of administration and lack of requirement for laboratory monitoring. Additional treatment trials are presently in progress and may establish LMWH as the treatment of choice for patients with thromboembolic disorders.     

Low molecular weight heparin and unfractionated heparin for prevention of thrombo-embolism in general surgery: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), unfractionated heparin (UFH) and warfarin were compared with respect to efficacy and safety in the prevention of thrombo-embolism in general surgery. Meta-analysis (MA) with a priori definition of the MA protocol was used to combine the results from randomised trials with patients who underwent general surgery and deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis with LMWH, UFH or warfarin. Forty-four studies were identified for assessment and 33 were included, however, none for warfarin. For efficacy (DVT and pulmonary embolism) and major bleeding, no significant difference between the LMWH- and UFH-treated groups was demonstrated. The relative risk of minor bleedings for LMWH versus UFH was 0.75 (0.64-0.88; 95% confidence interval) and is significant (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of the MA, LMWH and UFH did not differ significantly in terms of prevention of thrombo-embolism, but LMWH had a significantly better safety profile. On this basis, LMWH may be preferable to UFH in the prevention of thrombo-embolism in general surgery.     

Efficacy of a low molecular weight heparin administered intravenously or subcutaneously in comparison with intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Certoparin-Study Group

BACKGROUND: The main objective of the study presented was to test if thrombus regression can be improved by treatment with an intravenously or subcutaneously administered low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Patients with acute deep vein thrombosis were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous UFH (131 patients), intravenous (i.v.) LMWH (128 patients), or 8000 IU of the same LMWH bid subcutaneously (s.c.) (128 patients). All patients were treated with heparin for 14 to 16 days. Vitamin-K-antagonist prophylaxis was started between Day 12 and Day 14 after enrollment into the study. METHODS: Phlebographies and perfusion/ventilation lung scans were performed at baseline and on Days 12 to 16. Primary endpoint of the study was a reduction of the phlebographic Marder score. Secondary endpoints were recurrent thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE), major and minor bleedings and the rate of PE at inclusion and at the end of the study assessed by ventilation/perfusion scans. RESULTS: The Marder score improved by at least 30% in 32.4% (95% CI: 22.6 ... 42.2) of the patients receiving UFH, in 34.0% (95% CI: 24.9 ... 44.0) receiving LMWH i.v. and in 42.6% (95% CI: 32.8 ... 52.8) treated with the low molecular weight heparin s.c. The difference between LMWH s.c. and UFH was 10.2% (95% CI: -3.7% ... +24.5%) (p = 0.11). PE with clinical signs confirmed by objective methods occurred in three patients of the UFH group, one of whom died and was not observed in patients of the i.v. or s.c. LMWH-groups. During the first 15 days no patient receiving UFH or i.v. LMWH, and one patient on s.c. LMWH had a recurrent thrombosis. Major bleedings were observed in four patients receiving i.v. UFH compared to nine patients on i.v. LMWH (one of these patients died) and one patient on s.c. LMWH. Perfusion ventilation lung scans were obtained from 287 patients at baseline and from 246 patients on Days 12-16. PE, defined according to PIOPED-criteria as intermediate or high probability scans, was observed in 38.0% of the patients entering the study and in 18.3% on Days 12 to 16. New asymptomatic PE occurred less frequently in the groups on LMWH (7.1%, 7.5%, respectively) than in the UFH-group (12.6%) (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: S.c. treatment with a LMWH (certoparin) (b.i.d.) is at least as effective as UFH i.v. The hypothesis of increased efficacy of subcutaneous LMWH in resolving venous thrombi will have to be confirmed by an independent study comparing s.c. LMWH with UFH. The i.v. continuous infusion of the LMWH for 12 to 16 days does not result in a higher venous re-opening rate than intravenous standard heparin.     

Thrombophilia, anticoagulant therapy and pregnancy

Thromboembolic complications during pregnancy are the most common causes of maternal death. Here we report on thromboembolic prophylaxis of 60 pregnancies of 32 pregnant women with familial thrombophilia. Long-term Fraxiparine (Sanofi-Chinoin) as thromboprophylaxis was applied in 26 cases throughout pregnancy. UFH (Heparin-Ca inj.) was used in 11 cases, and there were 23 pregnancies without thromboembolic prophylaxis in our patient's case histories. Artificial abortions were not included in this paper. The ratio of successful pregnancies were: with Fraxiparine: 24/26 (92.3%), with UFH (Heparin-Ca): 8/11 (72.7%), without prophylaxis: 4/23 (17.4%). In the patient group treated with Fraxiparine there were no foetopathy, thrombocytopenia or bleeding complication. LMWH is recommended for pregnant women with familial thrombophilia. According to literature data and our own experiences the doses of LMWH in patients with familial thrombophilia, and -antiphospholipid syndrome, and -artificial heart value are suggested.     

The acute coronary ischemic syndromes--the central role of thrombosis

The postulate that thrombotic coronary occlusion was the underlying pathophysiologic event in the acute coronary ischemic syndromes was developed over the years 1912-60. This concept prompted the development of anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapies and the use of acetylsalicylic acid in such patients. A central role for coronary thrombus came to be questioned in the 1970s and the use of anticoagulants dramatically decreased and thrombolytic therapy was little used. Coronary angiographic studies among patients during the early hours of evolving myocardial infarction re-established the etiologic role of coronary thrombosis in the acute coronary ischemic syndromes, and were supplemented by careful autopsy studies. The concepts of meta-analysis lead to more accurate interpretations of earlier randomized, controlled trials of anticoagulant, antiplatelet and thrombolytic therapies. Large clinical trials have provided confirmatory evidence and have established the benefits of antiplatelet and thrombolytic agents in the acute ischemic syndromes. The benefit of long term anticoagulation following myocardial infarction has been demonstrated, although the benefit during the acute in-hospital phase of myocardial infarction is still uncertain. Currently, clinical trials are evaluating new antithrombins, antiplatelet agents, and thrombolytic agents and regimens among patients with unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction, and undergoing angioplasty for complex coronary lesions.     

Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin for treatment of Trousseau's syndrome

We report the case of a 76-year-old man with recurrent thromboses despite oral anticoagulation with phenprocoumon and low-grade chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation. Workup revealed a bronchial carcinoma (NSCCL) with hilar and mediastinal lymph node metastases. The clinical condition was consistent with Trousseau's syndrome. Based on reports in the literature, the therapy was changed to intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), which was effective in controlling the thrombotic coagulopathy. For practical reasons, despite a lack of evidence of its effectiveness in Trousseau's syndrome, therapy with UFH was changed to subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH, nadroparine) in therapeutic doses of 100 IU/ kg body wt. 12 hourly. On an outpatient basis, five chemotherapy cycles were administered, and after metastases of the brain had been detected radiotherapy was initiated. Following 7.5 months of progressive neoplastic disease the patient died. He had remained free of thromboembolic complications under continued LMWH therapy during the last 6.5 months of his life. LMWH might be a convenient alternative to the established therapy with UFH in Trousseau's syndrome.     

Treatment of deep venous thrombosis at home: evolution from ideas to medical practice

The diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) by duplex ultrasound is absolutely possible out of specialized centers. Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWH) allow to obtain a greater efficacy and safety compared to Unfractionated Heparin (UFH). The control of LMWH is very reduced. Two studies have just been published on the topic of treatment of DVT at home. The group of patients treated at home with LMWH is not presenting more complications than the group of patients initially treated at the hospital with UFH. Nevertheless, these studies concern a very selective population of patients. Our center has been proceeding to a study for 4 years (1993-1997) in comparing the treatment at home of proximal DVT by LMWH then oral anticoagulant, to the initial treatment (10 days) in hospital by also using LMWH then oral anticoagulant. The first results show that there is no difference between both groups in terms of end-points: death, extension or recurrence of the thrombus, pulmonary embolism, bleeding. Therefore, the treatment of some type of proximal DVT is possible at home. Nevertheless, it is necessary to be very cautions as the population studied so far is a selected one. Etiologies of DVT are a constant obsessive fear. DVT or pulmonary embolism represents a real general disease which is going to progress along life. The intervention of a specialized center is always necessary. It is a work in team which must get the upper hand compared to an isolated medical action.     

Induction of the acute-phase reaction increases heparin-binding proteins in plasma

We have previously demonstrated that the nonspecific binding of unfractionated heparin (UFH) to plasma proteins has a marked modulating effect on its anticoagulant activity. Since some heparin-binding proteins are also acute-phase-reactant proteins, we explored the possibility that the induction of the acute-phase response can increase the plasma concentrations of heparin-binding proteins. The recovery of a fixed amount of UFH or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) added in vitro to rat plasma samples obtained at various time intervals after the administration of intravenous endotoxin or subcutaneous turpentine was compared with that of saline-treated control animals. The anti-factor Xa activity was measured in the plasma samples before and after the addition of a chemically modified low-affinity heparin (LAH) to displace the proportion of the added heparin that is reversibly bound to plasma proteins. Our results show that at 6 hours post-endotoxin and at 24 hours post-turpentine treatment, virtually no anti-factor Xa activity could be measured in the plasma samples, while the expected levels were obtained for control plasma. After the addition of LAH to displace protein-bound UFH, essentially the same anti-factor Xa levels were measured in the plasma from all three treatment groups. These results indicate that induction of the acute-phase reaction can dramatically increase the levels of heparin-binding proteins in rat plasma. In addition, we compared the anti-factor Xa recovery of UFH with that of an LMWH from the plasma of endotoxin- and saline-treated rats and demonstrated that LMWH binds less to plasma proteins than UFH, even in plasma in which the levels of heparin-binding proteins are markedly elevated. The recovery of a fixed amount of UFH added in vitro to human plasma from septic patients was also reduced, but not to the same extent as seen in rat plasma. Removal of candidate heparin-binding and acute-phase proteins by immunodepletion indicated that vitronectin plays an important role in the nonspecific binding of UFH in patient plasma.     

Bleeding complications with new antithrombotics used in ischaemic heart disease

Despite adjunctive therapy with heparin and aspirin, patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) continue to be at risk of abrupt vessel closure and acute ischaemic events. In an attempt to overcome the limitations of traditional antithrombotics, more potent agents have been developed, including direct thrombin inhibitors (e.g., hirudin and hirulog) and new antiplatelet agents [e.g., the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor c7E3 Fab (ReoProTM)]. Initial phase-III trials of hirudin in patients with acute coronary syndromes identified an excess incidence of major bleeding complications. Some of these trials have been recommenced using lower doses. Reports on phase-III trials of hirulog should be forthcoming soon. Of the new agents, the chimeric monoclonal antibody fragment c7E3 Fab has the most extensive available data. In the phase-III evaluation of 7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications trial, the administration of a c7E3 Fab bolus plus c7E3 Fab infusion reduced the rate of major ischaemic events by 35% at 30 days (p = 0.008) in patients undergoing high-risk PTCA. Major bleeding episodes occurred more frequently with this regimen than with placebo, although rates of intracranial haemorrhage or surgery for bleeding did not differ between groups. The findings suggest that the risk of bleeding complications might be reduced, without compromising efficacy, by administering heparin on a weight-adjusted basis in patients treated with c7E3 Fab.     

Advances in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes

Many advances in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes have been realized over recent years. In ST elevation myocardial infarction, new aggressive thrombolytic regimens improve early reperfusion and improve survival. The current focus is on bolus thrombolysis, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, and low-molecular-weight heparin as adjuncts. In unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, two major advances are IIb/IIIa inhibition and low-molecular-weight heparin, each of which significantly improves the outcome of patients and which have just been approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration. Following acute coronary syndromes, cholesterol lowering with statin drugs has a major effect, even in the large group of patients with average cholesterol levels. Use of clopidogrel, a more potent antiplatelet agent than aspirin, appears to decrease recurrent ischemic events, which has highlighted the potential benefits of oral IIb/IIIa inhibitors, which are much more potent antiplatelet agents. An additional focus has been on ensuring that patients actually receive the currently available medications. With a great number of new medical treatments, the outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes has improved and will continue to improve as we enter the next millennium.     

Impaired platelet production of nitric oxide predicts presence of acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND: Thrombus formation within a coronary vessel is the acute precipitating event in most acute coronary syndromes. Recently, constitutive nitric oxide synthase (cNOS) has been identified in human platelets, and platelet-derived nitric oxide has been shown to inhibit platelet recruitment after aggregation. However, its role in regulating platelet responses under normal or pathologic conditions has not yet been elucidated. METHODS and RESULTS: We examined nitric oxide (NO) production by platelets isolated from 87 patients undergoing coronary angiography, 37 with stable angina and 50 with unstable angina or a myocardial infarction within 2 weeks. After stimulation with 5 micromol/L ADP, platelet aggregation and NO production were simultaneously measured with an NO-selective microelectrode adapted for use in a standard platelet aggregometer. Mean (+/-SEM) platelet-derived NO production was 1.78+/-0.36 pmol/10(8) and 0.26+/-0.05 pmol/10(8) platelets in coronary patients with stable angina and acute coronary syndromes, respectively (P=0. 0001). By logistic regression analysis, heparin treatment (odds ratio 6.6, CI 1.9 to 22.8, P=0.003), lower platelet-NO production (odds ratio 4.0, CI 1.3 to 11.5, P=0.01), and extent of atherosclerosis (odds ratio 1.5, CI 1.1 to 2.0, P=0.02) were independent predictors of an acute coronary syndrome. In the subset of patients with angiographic evidence of atherosclerosis (n=83), logistic regression demonstrated that platelet NO production (odds ratio 3.9, CI 1.3 to 11.1, P=0.01) and heparin treatment (odds ratio 6.4, CI 1.9 to 22.0, P=0.004) were independent predictors of an acute coronary syndrome, whereas extent of atherosclerosis was not. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, aggregating platelets from patients with acute coronary syndromes produce less NO. Since platelet aggregation and thrombus formation are implicated in unstable angina and myocardial infarction, impaired platelet-derived NO production may contribute to the development of acute coronary syndromes.     

Abciximab. An updated review of its use in ischaemic heart disease

Abciximab is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist that has proven to be of significant clinical value in improving patient outcome after percutaneous coronary revascularisation. Primarily, the drug inhibits platelet aggregation, but it may also have anticoagulant activity and other beneficial effects, such as inhibiting migration and promoting apoptosis of smooth muscle cells. Large well designed studies have found administration of abciximab (as an adjunct to heparin and aspirin) during percutaneous coronary revascularisation to significantly reduce the incidence of ischaemic complications occurring in the 30 days after the procedure. Significant benefit, particularly on the incidence of myocardial infarction, was still evident after 6 months in 2 of 4 major trials. Abciximab provides particular benefit in patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction who are undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularisation. The benefits of the drug are additive to those achieved with coronary stenting. Very preliminary data suggest that abciximab may improve coronary blood flow after myocardial infarction and allow reperfusion to be achieved with reduced thrombolytic doses. Caution is required to minimise the risk of bleeding complications with the use of abciximab in combination with heparin and aspirin. Careful patient selection, use of an appropriate heparin regimen, early vascular sheath removal and meticulous femoral artery access site care are recommended. Thrombocytopenia can occur with abciximab treatment, but severe cases are uncommon (< 2% of patients) and can be treated with platelet transfusions. The high acquisition cost of abciximab may be partly or fully offset by the costs averted by the reduced incidence of ischaemic complications and need for urgent and/or repeat revascularisation in high risk patients who receive the drug. However, if bleeding complications occur, this adds to treatment costs. Cost effectiveness analyses generally support the use of abciximab in high risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab can be recommended for the prevention of acute ischaemic events in most patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularisation, but careful patient selection and strict adherence to the recommended treatment protocol are required to reduce the risk of bleeding complications and thrombocytopenia. Its use in high risk patients is largely supported by pharmacoeconomic data. Further pharmacoeconomic information is needed to establish the drug as a standard of care for all patient groups. The indications for abciximab are likely to expand as more data on its use in acute coronary syndromes become available.     

Low-molecular-weight heparins

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) are a new group of parenteral anticoagulants. They represent a major clinical advance in anticoagulation since the identification of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in 1922 and the introduction of the synthetic coumarin derivative, warfarin, in 1948. Their predictable pharmacokinetics, increased bioavailability, and longer plasma half-life allow for once- or twice-daily dosing and eliminate the need for routine laboratory monitoring. This simplified administration stands to alter the clinical practice of anticoagulation. This review high-lights recent clinical trials and focuses on studies comparing LMWH with the other two major anticoagulants: UFH and coumadin.     

New anticoagulant strategies

The limitations of standard heparin have prompted the development of a variety of newer antithrombotic agents. In fact, a LMWH preparation has recently been approved for clinical use in North America. Of these novel preparations, LMWH, the direct thrombin inhibitors, and inhibitors of GPIIb-IIIa have been used clinically and are in advanced stages of evaluation. Not only is LMWH effective in the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in high-risk patients, but its more predictable dose response makes it an ideal candidate for the treatment of venous thrombosis. Further studies are needed to determine whether LMWH is superior to standard heparin as adjunctive therapy in patients undergoing coronary thrombolysis or angioplasty. Particularly promising in the setting of arterial thrombosis are hirudin, hirulog, and 7E3. With the encouraging results reported to date, it is likely that these agents will soon find their way into the treatment armamentarium of arterial thrombosis.     

Low-molecular-weight heparins in the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics and clinical efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) in the treatment of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). Adverse effects, dosing, and cost issues are also discussed. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (January 1984-October 1997) was used to identify pertinent French and English literature, including clinical trials and reviews on LMWHs and their use in DVT. STUDY SELECTION: Trials comparing dalteparin, enoxaparin, tinzaparin, and nadroparin with UFH were selected. As studies were numerous, only randomized trials including more than 50 patients were reviewed. Moreover, all patients studied had a first episode of symptomatic DVT confirmed by objective tests (i.e., venography, duplex ultrasonography, impedance plethysmography). Clinical efficacy and safety of LMWHs were assessed in these trials. DATA EXTRACTION: Results pertaining to venographic assessment, recurrent thromboembolism, total mortality, and bleeding complications were extracted from the selected studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Compared with UFH, LMWHs have a longer plasma half-life, better subcutaneous bioavailability, more predictable anticoagulant response, and require less intense laboratory monitoring. Most trials demonstrate comparable effects on thrombus extension and incidence of recurrent thromboembolism. Compared with UFH, LMWHs do not alter total mortality. Although animal trials predict a lower hemorrhagic potential for LMWHs, the incidence of bleeding complications is generally similar to that observed with UFH. Outpatient management of DVT with LMWHs has shown comparable safety and efficacy with inpatient UFH use but a shorter hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Because LMWHs are as safe and as effective as UFH, and because of their more convenient method of administration, they can be considered valuable alternatives for the treatment of DVT. Savings generated by less intensive laboratory monitoring and the possibility of early hospital discharge and outpatient therapy may outweight the higher acquisition cost of LMWHs.     

Potential impact of evidence-based medicine in acute coronary syndromes: insights from GUSTO-IIb. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes trial

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study to determine whether use of cardiac medications reflects evidence-based recommendations for patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. BACKGROUND: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research practice guidelines for unstable angina recommend the use of cardiac medications based on evidence from randomized trials. It is unknown whether practitioners in the U.S., Canada and Europe follow these recommendations in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. METHODS: We studied 7,743 patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes enrolled in the international Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes trial. The use of aspirin, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blocking agents was determined at discharge for all patients and "ideal" patients (those with indications and no contraindications). Using published estimates of relative mortality reductions with these drugs, we calculated the lives that could have been saved at 1 year if discharge medication use had better matched guideline recommendations. RESULTS: Overall, guideline adherence at discharge in "ideal" patients was 85.6% for aspirin, 59.1% for beta-blockers and 51.7% for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Calcium channel blockers were given to 26.7% of patients with a contraindication to these drugs. These rates were similar across locations of enrollment. Women and older patients less often received aspirin when "ideal," and younger patients more often received calcium channel blockers when they were contraindicated. If medication use had been more evidence-based, 1-year mortality might have been reduced by a relative 22%. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant room for improvement in the use of recommended drugs in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Medication use that more closely follows recommendations could reduce mortality in this population.     

IgG antibodies to chlamydial and mycoplasma infection plus C-reactive protein related to poor outcome in unstable angina

This postal survey among 174 UK palliative physicians, aimed to assess current practice and perceived problems within the management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with advanced cancer. The questionnaire was returned by 131 out of 174 (74%) of the doctors surveyed. The most common estimated incidence of patients with VTE was 1-5%. The diagnosis of VTE is usually confirmed by further investigation and in general, outpatients are more likely to be anticoagulated than inpatients. Problems with anticoagulation include bleeding, international normalized ratio instability, appropriateness of anticoagulation, practical difficulties associated with monitoring, and recurrent VTE. Although probably less effective, 77 out of 128 (60%) of respondents use subtherapeutic regimes in order to minimize the risks. Patients with advanced malignancy and VTE are anticoagulated, if considered appropriate, by the vast majority of palliative physicians in the UK. Warfarin has been abandoned in favour of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) by 26%. LMWH provides anticoagulation with no need for monitoring, has no significant drug interactions and is not affected by liver dysfunction. Theoretically, LMWH is more effective than warfarin in the secondary prevention of VTE with less risk of bleeding.     

Low molecular weight heparins: a valuable tool in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes

Standard heparin, low molecular weight heparin and aspirin are at present the only antithrombotic agents of proven value in the initial treatment of patients with an acute coronary syndrome. The combined use of aspirin and one of the heparins for at least 6 days should be considered for all such patients. With their high bio-availability after subcutaneous injection and prolonged half-life, low molecular weight heparins simplify short-term treatment in the acute phase and enable long-term therapy to be maintained on an outpatient basis without the need for repeated laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant effects. Such long-term therapy would appear to be beneficial, at least in high-risk patients, in the light of increasing evidence that the underlying lesion in acute coronary syndromes resolves over a period of weeks or months.     

C-reactive protein as a marker for acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND: For several years, acute coronary syndromes have been perceived as causing the most hospital admissions, and even hospital mortality. The syndrome of unstable angina frequently progresses to acute myocardial infarction but its pathogenesis is poorly understood, and prognosis determination is still problematic. We tested the hypothesis that measurement of the C-reactive protein in patients admitted for chest pain could be a marker for acute coronary syndromes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 110 patients admitted with suspected ischaemic heart disease, but without elevated serum creatine-kinase levels at the time of hospital admission. Patients were subsequently divided into two groups based on their final diagnosis: group 1 comprised patients with unstable angina; group 2 patients with acute myocardial infarction. We measured the C-reactive protein at the time of hospital admission. The concentration of C-reactive protein was elevated in 59% of the patients with a final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, and in 5% of the patients with a final diagnosis of unstable angina, (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that C-reactive protein levels measured at the time of admission in patients with suspected ischaemic heart disease could be a marker for acute coronary syndromes, and helpful in identifying patients at high risk for acute myocardial infarction. Measurement of C-reactive protein may have practical clinical significance in the management of patients hospitalized for suspected acute coronary syndromes.     

Metastatic carcinoma of the prostate mimicking primary carcinoid tumor of the lung and mediastinum

AIMS: To investigate the current use of thrombolytic therapy in the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction and to determine the potential for an increased use of thrombolysis or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). METHODS AND RESULTS: All hospitalised cases of acute myocardial infarction were identified in three health districts in the UK (population of 960,000) in patients under the age of 76 years during a 2-year period; 2439 patients had acute myocardial infarction, of whom 1264 (52%) received thrombolytic therapy. Failure to administer thrombolytic therapy was a result of the absence of diagnostic electrocardiograms in 712 (29.2%) patients, late presentation in 127 (5.2%), therapeutic error in 112 (4.6%), presence of a bleeding risk in 139 (5.7%) and other miscellaneous reasons in 80 (3.3%) patients. Thirty-eight of the 139 patients in whom bleeding risk was reported as a contra-indication could, in retrospect, have received thrombolytic therapy and a further 76 would have been suitable for primary PTCA. CONCLUSIONS: The potential for increasing the use of thrombolytic therapy seems to be limited and is unlikely to make a major impact on the in-hospital mortality from acute myocardial infarction. However, primary PTCA should be considered in those who are ineligible for thrombolysis because of bleeding risk as a contra-indication.