The Complexity of Reasoning with Global Constraints

Constraint propagation is one of the techniques central to the success of constraint programming. To reduce search, fast algorithms associated with each constraint prune the domains of variables. With global (or non-binary) constraints, the cost of such propagation may be much greater than the quadratic cost for binary constraints. We therefore study the computational complexity of reasoning with global constraints. We first characterise a number of important questions related to constraint propagation. We show that such questions are intractable in general, and identify dependencies between the tractability and intractability of the different questions. We then demonstrate how the tools of computational complexity can be used in the design and analysis of specific global constraints. In particular, we illustrate how computational complexity can be used to determine when a lesser level of local consistency should be enforced, when constraints can be safely generalized, when decomposing constraints will reduce the amount of pruning, and when combining constraints is tractable.     

On the Exact Complexity of Evaluating Quantified k -CNF

We relate the exponential complexities 2 ^s(k)n of $\textsc {$k$-sat}$ and the exponential complexity $2^{s(\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf}))n}$ of $\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf})$ (the problem of evaluating quantified formulas of the form $\forall\vec{x} \exists\vec{y} \textsc {F}(\vec {x},\vec{y})$ where F is a 3-cnf in $\vec{x}$ variables and $\vec{y}$ variables) and show that s(∞) (the limit of s(k) as k→∞) is at most $s(\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf}))$ . Therefore, if we assume the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis, then there is no algorithm for $\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf})$ running in time 2 ^cn with c<1. On the other hand, a nontrivial exponential-time algorithm for $\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf})$ would provide a $\textsc {$k$-sat}$ solver with better exponent than all current algorithms for sufficiently large k. We also show several syntactic restrictions of the evaluation problem $\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf})$ have nontrivial algorithms, and provide strong evidence that the hardest cases of $\textsc {eval}(\mathrm {\varPi }_{2} 3\textsc {-cnf})$ must have a mixture of clauses of two types: one universally quantified literal and two existentially quantified literals, or only existentially quantified literals. Moreover, the hardest cases must have at least n?o(n) universally quantified variables, and hence only o(n) existentially quantified variables. Our proofs involve the construction of efficient minimally unsatisfiable $\textsc {$k$-cnf}$ s and the application of the Sparsification lemma.     

Complexity of Clausal Constraints Over Chains

We investigate the complexity of the satisfiability problem of constraints over finite totally ordered domains. In our context, a clausal constraint is a disjunction of inequalities of the form x≥d and x≤d. We classify the complexity of constraints based on clausal patterns. A pattern abstracts away from variables and contains only information about the domain elements and the type of inequalities occurring in a constraint. Every finite set of patterns gives rise to a (clausal) constraint satisfaction problem in which all constraints in instances must have an allowed pattern. We prove that every such problem is either polynomially decidable or NP-complete, and give a polynomial-time algorithm for recognizing the tractable cases. Some of these tractable cases are new and have not been previously identified in the literature.     

The Complexity of Compressed Membership Problems for Finite Automata

In this paper, a compressed membership problem for finite automata, both deterministic (DFAs) and non-deterministic (NFAs), with compressed transition labels is studied. The compression is represented by straight-line programs (SLPs), i.e. context-free grammars generating exactly one string. A novel technique of dealing with SLPs is employed: the SLPs are recompressed, so that substrings of the input word are encoded in SLPs labelling the transitions of the NFA (DFA) in the same way, as in the SLP representing the input text. To this end, the SLPs are locally decompressed and then recompressed in a uniform way. Furthermore, in order to reflect the recompression in the NFA, we need to modify it only a little, in particular its size stays polynomial in the input size. Using this technique it is shown that the compressed membership for NFA with compressed labels is in NP, thus confirming the conjecture of Plandowski and Rytter (Jewels Are Forever, pp. 262–272, Springer, Berlin, 1999) and extending the partial result of Lohrey and Mathissen (in CSR, LNCS, vol. 6651, pp. 275–288, Springer, Berlin, 2011); as this problem is known to be NP-hard (in Plandowski and Rytter, Jewels Are Forever, pp. 262–272, Springer, Berlin, 1999), we settle its exact computational complexity. Moreover, the same technique applied to the compressed membership for DFA with compressed labels yields that this problem is in P, and this problem is known to be P-hard (in Markey and Schnoebelen, Inf. Process. Lett. 90(1):3–6, 2004; Beaudry et al., SIAM J. Comput. 26(1):138–152, 1997).     

The Relative Complexity of Approximate Counting Problems

Two natural classes of counting problems that are interreducible under approximation-preserving reductions are: (i) those that admit a particular kind of efficient approximation algorithm known as an FPRAS, and (ii) those that are complete for #P with respect to approximation-preserving reducibility. We describe and investigate not only these two classes but also a third class, of intermediate complexity, that is not known to be identical to (i) or (ii). The third class can be characterised as the hardest problems in a logically defined subclass of #P.     

The Relative Complexity of Approximate Counting Problems

Two natural classes of counting problems that are interreducible under approximation-preserving reductions are: (i) those that admit a particular kind of efficient approximation algorithm known as an “FPRAS”, and (ii) those that are complete for #P with respect to approximation-preserving reducibility. We describe and investigate not only these two classes but also a third class, of intermediate complexity, that is not known to be identical to (i) or (ii). The third class can be characterised as the hardest problems in a logically defined subclass of #P.     

The Complexity of Bottleneck Labeled Graph Problems

We study bottleneck labeled optimization problems arising in the context of graph theory. This long-established model partitions the set of edges into classes, each of which is identified by a unique color. The generic objective is to construct a subgraph of prescribed structure (such as an s-t path, a spanning tree, or a perfect matching) while trying to minimize the maximum (or, alternatively, maximize the minimum) number of edges picked from any given color.     

Sample Complexity for Computational Classification Problems

In a statistical setting of the classification (pattern recognition) problem the number of examples required to approximate an unknown labelling function is linear in the VC dimension of the target learning class. In this work we consider the question of whether such bounds exist if we restrict our attention to computable classification methods, assuming that the unknown labelling function is also computable. We find that in this case the number of examples required for a computable method to approximate the labelling function not only is not linear, but grows faster (in the VC dimension of the class) than any computable function. No time or space constraints are put on the predictors or target functions; the only resource we consider is the training examples. The task of classification is considered in conjunction with another learning problem - data compression. An impossibility result for the task of data compression allows us to estimate the sample complexity for pattern recognition.     

PSL可满足问题的计算复杂度

PSL是一种用于描述并行系统的属性规约语言,包括线性时序逻辑FL和分支时序逻辑OBE两部分。由于OBE就是CTL,因此论文重点研究FL逻辑。理论上已证明许多难解的问题都可多项式变换为“可满足性”问题,“可满足性”问题是研究时序逻辑的核心问题之一,并已成为程序验证的一种有力工具;而计算复杂度是“可满足性”问题需要解决的最深刻的方向之一,其研究意义在于它可作为解决一类问题的难度的标准。文中在利用“铺砖模型”基础上,推导并得出FL的“可满足性”问题的计算复杂度为EXPSPACE—hard,这对正确评价解决该问题的各种算法的效率,进而确定对已有算法的改进余地具有重要的指导意义。     

PSL可满足问题的计算复杂度

PSL是一种用于描述并行系统的属性规约语言,包括线性时序逻辑FL和分支时序逻辑OBE两部分。由于OBE就是CTL,因此论文重点研究FL逻辑。理论上已证明许多难解的问题都可多项式变换为“可满足性”问题,“可满足性”问题是研究时序逻辑的核心问题之一,并已成为程序验证的一种有力工具;而计算复杂度是“可满足性”问题需要解决的最深刻的方向之一,其研究意义在于它可作为解决一类问题的难度的标准。文中在利用“铺砖模型”基础上,推导并得出FL的“可满足性”问题的计算复杂度为EXPSPACE—hard,这对正确评价解决该问题的各种算法的效率,进而确定对已有算法的改进余地具有重要的指导意义。     

The Update Complexity of Selection and Related Problems

We present a framework for computing with input data specified by intervals, representing uncertainty in the values of the input parameters. To compute a solution, the algorithm can query the input parameters that yield more refined estimates in the form of sub-intervals and the objective is to minimize the number of queries. The previous approaches address the scenario where every query returns an exact value. Our framework is more general as it can deal with a wider variety of inputs and query responses and we establish interesting relationships between them that have not been investigated previously. Although some of the approaches of the previous restricted models can be adapted to the more general model, we require more sophisticated techniques for the analysis and we also obtain improved algorithms for the previous model. We address selection problems in the generalized model and show that there exist 2-update competitive algorithms that do not depend on the lengths or distribution of the sub-intervals and hold against the worst case adversary. We also obtain similar bounds on the competitive ratio for the MST problem in graphs.     

The Complexity of Counting Problems in Equational Matching

We introduce a class of counting problems that arise naturally in equational matching and investigate their computational complexity. If E is an equational theory, then #E-Matching is the problem of counting the number of most general E-matchers of two given terms. #E-Matching is a well-defined algorithmic problem for every finitary equational theory. Moreover, it captures more accurately the computational difficulties associated with finding minimal complete sets of E-matchers than the corresponding decision problem for E-matching does.In 1979, L. Valiant developed a computational model for measuring the complexity of counting problems and demonstrated the existence of #P-complete problems, i.e., counting problems that are complete for counting non-deterministic Turing machines of polynomial-time complexity. Using the theory of #P-completeness, we analyze the computational complexity of #E-matching for several important equational theories E. We establish that if E is one of the equational theories A, C, AC, I, U, ACI, Set, ACU, or ACIU, then #E-Matching is a #P-complete problem. We also show that there are equational theories, such as the restriction of AC-matching to linear terms, for which the underlying decision matching problem is solvable in polynomial time, while the associated counting matching problem is #P-complete.     

Complexity of Approximating CSP with Balance / Hard Constraints

We study two natural extensions of Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs). Balance-Max-CSP requires that in any feasible assignment each element in the domain is used an equal number of times. An instance of Hard-Max-CSP consists of soft constraints and hard constraints, and the goal is to maximize the weight of satisfied soft constraints while satisfying all the hard constraints. These two extensions contain many fundamental problems not captured by CSPs, and challenge traditional theories about CSPs in a more general framework. Max-2-SAT and Max-Horn-SAT are the only two nontrivial classes of Boolean CSPs that admit a robust satisfibiality algorithm, i.e., an algorithm that finds an assignment satisfying at least (1 ? g(ε)) fraction of constraints given a (1 ? ε)-satisfiable instance, where g(ε) → 0 as ε → 0, and g(0) = 0. We prove the inapproximability of these problems with balance or hard constraints, showing that each variant changes the nature of the problems significantly (in different ways). For instance, deciding whether an instance of 2-SAT admits a balanced assignment is NP-hard, and for Max-2-SAT with hard constraints, it is hard to find a constant-factor approximation even on (1 ? ε)-satisfiable instances (in particular, the version with hard constraints does not admit a robust satisfiability algorithm). We also study hardness results for a certain CSP over a larger domain capturing ordering constraints: we show that hard constraints rule out constant-factor approximation algorithms. All our hardness results are almost optimal — they completely rule out algorithms with certain properties, or can be matched by simple extensions to existing algorithms.     

The Complexity of Linear and Stratified Context Matching Problems

We give algorithms for linear and for general context matching and discuss how the performance in the general case can be improved through the use of information derived from approximations that can be computed in polynomial time. We investigate the complexity of context matching with respect to the stratification of variable occurrences, where our main results are that stratified context matching is NP-complete, but that stratified simultaneous monadic context matching is in P. SSMCM is equivalent to stratified simultaneous word matching. We also show that the linear and the Comon-restricted cases are in~P and of time complexity O(n³), and that varity 2 context matching, where variables occur at most twice, is NP-complete.     

Fixed-Parameter Complexity of Minimum Profile Problems

The profile of a graph is an integer-valued parameter defined via vertex orderings; it is known that the profile of a graph equals the smallest number of edges of an interval supergraph. Since computing the profile of a graph is an NP-hard problem, we consider parameterized versions of the problem. Namely, we study the problem of deciding whether the profile of a connected graph of order n is at most n−1+k, considering k as the parameter; this is a parameterization above guaranteed value, since n−1 is a tight lower bound for the profile. We present two fixed-parameter algorithms for this problem. The first algorithm is based on a forbidden subgraph characterization of interval graphs. The second algorithm is based on two simple kernelization rules which allow us to produce a kernel with linear number of vertices and edges. For showing the correctness of the second algorithm we need to establish structural properties of graphs with small profile which are of independent interest. A preliminary version of the paper is published in Proc. IWPEC 2006, LNCS vol. 4169, 60–71.     

Parameterized Complexity of Eulerian Deletion Problems

We study a family of problems where the goal is to make a graph Eulerian, i.e., connected and with all the vertices having even degrees, by a minimum number of deletions. We completely classify the parameterized complexity of various versions: undirected or directed graphs, vertex or edge deletions, with or without the requirement of connectivity, etc. The collection of results shows an interesting contrast: while the node-deletion variants remain intractable, i.e., W[1]-hard for all the studied cases, edge-deletion problems are either fixed-parameter tractable or polynomial-time solvable. Of particular interest is a randomized FPT algorithm for making an undirected graph Eulerian by deleting the minimum number of edges, based on a novel application of the color coding technique. For versions that remain NP-complete but fixed-parameter tractable we consider also possibilities of polynomial kernelization; unfortunately, we prove that this is not possible unless NP?coNP/poly.