Does vitamin fortification affect light oxidation in fluid skim milk?

Off-flavors in milk related to light oxidation form due to photoxidation of native riboflavin and tetrapyrroles, resulting in an array of lipid oxidation compounds. Recent work has established that fortification with water-dispersible vitamin A can result in off-flavors in fluid skim milk caused by vitamin A degradation products in the vitamin premix. The objective of this study was to determine the role of vitamin fortification on light oxidation of high temperature, short time pasteurized fluid skim milk. First, the aroma profiles and aroma-active volatile compounds in light-exposed vitamin premixes were determined by exposing the premixes to fluorescent (FL) or light-emitting diode (LED) light at 2,000 lx at 4°C for 0, 2, 4, 8, or 24 h. A trained panel (n = 6) documented aroma profiles of each vitamin premix at each time point. Headspace solid-phase microextraction followed by gas chromatography-olfactometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) were performed to characterize aroma-active compounds in light-exposed vitamin premixes. In the second experiment, commercial vitamin premixes (vitamin A and vitamin D in oil and water matrices) were used to fortify skim milk (vitamin A: 3,000 IU/946 mL; vitamin D: 600 IU/946 mL). Skim milk was pasteurized, homogenized, and packaged in 946-mL high-density polyethylene jugs. Milks were exposed to FL or LED light at 2,000 lx at 4°C for 4, 12, 24, or 48 h. Controls with and without vitamins and light shielding were included. Riboflavin and vitamin A and D degradation were quantified via ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. A trained panel (n = 8) documented sensory profiles of milks at each time point. Lipid oxidation volatile compounds were quantified via solid-phase microextraction with GC-MS. Vitamin degradation volatile compounds were quantified via solvent-assisted sorptive stir bar extraction with GC-MS. Riboflavin, vitamin A, and vitamin D degradation were consistent with that reported in previous studies. We found no effect of vitamin fortification on development of typical light oxidation–related off-flavors (cardboard and mushroom) or lipid oxidation–related volatiles (hexanal and heptanal). A perfumey/floral flavor was documented in the oil-based vitamin A-fortified milk, suggesting that light exposure affected the off-flavors contributed by water- versus oil-based vitamin fortification. These results show no evidence that vitamin fortification at current levels provides any protection against light oxidation–related off-flavors in fluid milk.     

Vitamin Fortification of Fluid Milk

Vitamin concentrates with vitamins A and D are used for fortification of fluid milk. Although many of the degradation components of vitamins A and D have an important role in flavor/fragrance applications, they may also be source(s) of off‐flavor(s) in vitamin fortified milk due to their heat, oxygen, and the light sensitivity. It is very important for the dairy industry to understand how vitamin concentrates can impact flavor and flavor stability of fluid milk. Currently, little research on vitamin degradation products can be found with respect to flavor contributions. In this review, the history, regulations, processing, and storage stability of vitamins in fluid milk are addressed along with some hypotheses for the role of vitamin A and D fortification on flavor and stability of fluid milk.     

Vitamin D content and variability in fluid milks from a US Department of Agriculture nationwide sampling to update values in the National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference

This study determined the vitamin D₃ content and variability of retail milk in the United States having a declared fortification level of 400 IU (10 μg) per quart (qt; 1 qt = 946.4 mL), which is 25% daily value per 8 fluid ounce (236.6 mL) serving. In 2007, vitamin D₃ fortified milk (skim, 1%, 2%, whole, and 1% fat chocolate milk) was collected from 24 statistically selected supermarkets in the United States. Additionally, 2% milk samples from an earlier 2001 USDA nationwide collection were reanalyzed. Vitamin D₃ was determined using a specifically validated method involving HPLC with UV spectroscopic detection and vitamin D₂ as an internal standard. Quality control materials were analyzed with the samples. Of the 120 milk samples procured in 2007, 49% had vitamin D₃ within 100 to 125% of 400 IU (10 μg)/qt (label value), 28% had 501 to 600 IU (12.5-15 μg)/qt, 16% had a level below the label amount, and 7% had greater than 600 IU (15 μg)/qt (>150% of label). Even though the mean vitamin D₃ content did not differ statistically between milk types, a wide range in values was found among individual samples, from nondetectable [<20 IU (0.5 μg)/qt] for one sample to almost 800 IU (20 μg)/qt, with a trend toward more samples of whole milk having greater than 150% of the labeled content. On average, vitamin D₃ in 2% milk was higher in 2007 compared with in 2001 [473 vs. 426 IU (11.8 vs. 10.6 μg)/qt].     

Fortification of cheese with vitamin D(3) using dairy protein emulsions as delivery systems

Vitamin D is an essential vitamin that is synthesized when the body is exposed to sunlight or after the consumption of fortified foods and supplements. The purpose of this research was to increase the retention of vitamin D(3) in Cheddar cheese by incorporating it as part of an oil-in-water emulsion using a milk protein emulsifier to obtain a fortification level of 280 IU/serving. Four oil-in-water vitamin D emulsions were made using sodium caseinate, calcium caseinate, nonfat dry milk (NDM), or whey protein. These emulsions were used to fortify milk, and the retention of vitamin D(3) in cheese curd in a model cheesemaking system was calculated. A nonemulsified vitamin D(3) oil was used as a control to fortify milk. Significantly more vitamin D(3) was retained in the curd when using the emulsified vitamin D(3) than the nonemulsified vitamin D(3) oil (control). No significant differences were observed in the retention of vitamin D(3) when emulsions were formulated with different emulsifiers. Mean vitamin D(3) retention in the model system cheese curd was 96% when the emulsions were added to either whole or skim milk compared with using the nonemulsified oil, which gave mean retentions of only 71% and 64% when added to whole and skim milk, respectively. A similar improvement in retention was achieved when cheese was made from whole and reduced-fat milk using standard manufacturing procedures on a small scale. When sufficient vitamin D(3) was added to produce cheese containing a target level of approximately 280 IU per 28-g serving, retention was greater when the vitamin D(3) was emulsified with NDM than when using nonemulsified vitamin D(3) oil. Only 58±3% of the nonemulsified vitamin D(3) oil was retained in full-fat Cheddar cheese, whereas 78±8% and 74±1% were retained when using the vitamin D(3) emulsion in full-fat and reduced-fat Cheddar cheese, respectively.     

Fluid milk vitamin fortification compliance in New York State

Current US regulations, as specified in the Pasteurized Milk Ordinance, require vitamin A fortification of all reduced fat fluid milk products. The addition of vitamin D is optional in all fluid products. Acceptable vitamin concentrations in fortified milks are 2000 to 3000 International units per quart for vitamin A and 400 to 600 International units per quart for vitamin D. Vitamin A and D levels were analyzed in fortified milk products collected over a 4-yr period in New York State. Samples of whole fat, 2% fat, 1% fat, and nonfat milks were collected twice per year from up to 31 dairy processing plants. For vitamin A, 44.5% of 516 samples were in compliance with current regulations, and 47.7% of 648 samples were within the acceptable range for vitamin D. Most milk samples that were out of compliance were underfortified.     

Short communication: Comparison of 3 rapid methods for analysis of vitamin degradation compounds in fluid skim milk

Vitamin fortification of dairy products, including fluid milk and fortified whey protein beverages, is an industry standard but can lead to the development of off-flavor compounds that are difficult to extract and detect by instrumental methods. Previous work has identified these compounds and their specific role in off-flavors in skim milk, but efficient extraction and quantification of these compounds remains a challenge. Three rapid methods (stir bar sorptive extraction, solvent-assisted stir bar sorptive extraction, and solid-phase microextraction) were compared for their ability to effectively recover vitamin degradation volatiles from fluid skim milk. The performance of the 3 methods for detecting and quantifying vitamin degradation-related volatile compounds was determined by linear regression of standard curves prepared from spiked standards of 5 vitamin degradation volatiles, the reproducibility on the same day and between days as measured by the average relative standard deviation of each standard curve, and the limits of detection and quantitation. Measurement of vitamin degradation compounds in commercial pasteurized fortified skim milks was also conducted using each method. Detection of selected vitamin degradation volatiles was linear in skim milk (0.005–200 μg/kg). Coefficient of determination values differed between methods and compounds. Within-day and between-day percentage of relative standard deviation also varied with compound and method. Limits of detection and quantitation values for all methods except solid-phase microextraction were lower than concentrations of selected volatile compounds typically found in commercial milk. Solvent-assisted stir bar sorptive extraction with a 10-mL sample volume provided the most consistent detection of selected compounds in commercial milks. Based on linearity, relative standard deviation, and limits of detection and quantitation, cyclohexane solvent-assisted stir bar sorptive extraction with 10-mL sample volume is recommended for the quantitation of vitamin degradation-related volatiles in fluid skim milk.     

Impact of fortification with iron salts and vitamin A on the physicochemical properties of laboratory‐pasteurised toned milk and bioaccessibility of the added nutrients

The sensory and physicochemical attributes of pasteurised milk fortified with soluble ferric pyrophosphate (FPP) (25 mg/L iron) and vitamin A (2500 IU) were comparable to unfortified control samples. The heat coagulation time (HCT) of fortified milks was comparable to the control and exhibited a type A curve with HCT–pH maxima at the acidic side of the natural pH. The distribution pattern of iron in different milk fractions was similar in control and fortified milk samples. The bioaccessibility of iron, estimated through in vitro digestibility of milk fortified with vitamin A and iron, was found to be slightly higher than that of milk fortified with iron alone.     

Influence of milk fat, milk solids, and light intensity on the light stability of vitamin A and riboflavin in lowfat milk

Retinyl palmitate and riboflavin were quantified in milk samples exposed to fluorescent light. Effects of compositional factors were determined by comparing rates of loss of riboflavin and vitamin A in milks with different amounts of milk fat and milk solids. Upon exposure to fluorescent light, rates of vitamin A and riboflavin loss were lower in whole milk than in skim milk. Riboflavin degraded more slowly in skim milk with 1% added nonfat dry milk than in skim milk with no added solids. No additional protective effect for riboflavin was found when added solids were increased from 1 to 3%. Compared with milk with no added solids, 1% added nonfat dry milk did not increased protection for vitamin A, but a protective effect was noted when the skim milk was fortified with 3% nonfat dry milk. Increasing light intensity increased the rates of loss of both vitamins, and riboflavin was lost at a greater rate.     

Effect of Carrier Type and Amount on Vitamin A Light Degradation in Fortified Lowfat and Skim Milks

Effects of type and amount of retinyl palmitate carrier on light stability of all-trans retinyl palmitate in fortified lowfat milks were investigated. Skim and 2% fat milks were fortified with retinyl palmitate using butter, coconut, corn, or peanut oil as the vitamin carrier. After pasteurization and homogenization, fortified milk samples were exposed to light in glass tubes. At regular intervals, samples were removed from light and analyzed for all-trans retinyl palmitate using high performance liquid chromatography. Less light-induced loss of all-trans retinyl palmitate occurred in skim and 2% fat milks fortified using butter or coconut oil than those using corn or peanut oil. Amount of coconut or corn oil used to incorporate retinyl palmitate also played a role in its light-induced degradation rate. At a carrier concentration of .001% (vol/vol) in skim milk, light degradation of all-trans retinyl palmitate proceeded approximately twice as fast as .01 or .1% (vol/vol). Addition of Tween 80 as an emulsifier had negligible effect on retinyl palmitate light degradation in fortified skim milk.     

A survey of vitamin A and D contents of fortified fluid milk in Ontario

High performance liquid chromatographic methods for measuring the concentration of vitamins A and D in fluid milk were validated and used to assess the level of these nutrients in Ontario retail milk samples. Thirteen and fifteen fortified milk samples were tested for vitamins A and D, respectively. Repeatability relative standard deviation values for vitamins A and D in milk were generally less than 10%. Recoveries varied from 87 to 107%. Vitamin D results indicated that only 20% of skim, 40% of 2% fat milk, and 20% of whole milk contained the recommended levels, whereas 46% of skim, and 77% of 2% fat milk had the required levels of vitamin A. The results indicate that vitamin level varies widely in Ontario retail milk.     

Short communication: Production of cottage cheese fortified with vitamin D

The availability of alternative food products fortified with vitamin D could help decrease the percentage of the population with vitamin D deficiency. The objective of this study was to fortify cheese with vitamin D. Cottage cheese was selected because its manufacture allows for the addition of vitamin D after the draining step without any loss of the vitamin in whey. Cream containing vitamin D (145 IU/g of cream) was mixed with the fresh cheese curds, resulting in a final concentration of 51 IU/g of cheese. Unfortified cottage cheese was used as a control. As expected, the cottage cheese was fortified without any loss of vitamin D in the cheese whey. The vitamin D added to cream was not affected by homogenization or pasteurization treatments. In cottage cheese, the vitamin D concentration remained stable during 3 weeks of storage at 4°C. Compared with the control cheese, the cheese fortified with vitamin D showed no effects of fortification on cheese characteristics or sensory properties. Cottage cheese could be a new source of vitamin D or an alternative to fortified drinking milk.     

Children's perceptions of fluid milk with varying levels of milkfat

Schools participating in federal meal programs are limited to serving skim or low-fat (≤1%) flavored and unflavored milk. Few studies have directly addressed child perceptions and preferences for milk containing different amounts of milkfat. The objective of this study was to determine whether children can differentiate between flavored and unflavored fluid milk containing varying levels of milkfat and whether preferences for certain levels of milkfat exist. Flavored and unflavored milks containing 4 different percentages of milkfat (≤0.5, 1, 2, and 3.25%) were high-temperature, short-time processed, filled into half-gallon light-shielded milk jugs, and stored at 4°C in the dark. Milks were evaluated by children (ages 8–13 yr) following 7 d at 4°C. Acceptance testing and tetrad difference testing were conducted on flavored and unflavored milks with and without visual cues to determine if differences were driven by visual or flavor or mouthfeel cues. Child acceptance testing (n = 138 unflavored; n = 123 flavored) was conducted to evaluate liking and perception of selected attributes. Tetrad testing (n = 127 unflavored; n = 129 flavored) was conducted to determine if children could differentiate between different fat levels even in the absence of a difference in acceptance. The experiment was replicated twice. When visual cues were present, children had higher overall liking for 1% and 2% milks than skim for unflavored milk and higher liking for chocolate milks containing at least 1% milk fat than for skim. Differences in liking were driven by appearance, viscosity, and flavor. In the absence of visual cues, no differences were observed in liking or flavor or mouthfeel attributes for unflavored milk but higher liking for at least 1% milk fat in chocolate milk compared with skim was consistent with the presence of visual cues. From tetrad testing, children could visually tell a difference between all unflavored pairs except 2% versus whole milk and could not detect consistent differences between milkfat pairs in the absence of visual cues. For chocolate milk, children could tell a difference between all milk fat pairs with visual cues and could tell a difference between skim versus 2% and skim versus whole milk without visual cues. These results demonstrate that in the absence of package-related flavors, school-age children like unflavored skim milk as well as milk with higher fat content in the absence of visual cues. In contrast, appearance as well as flavor and mouthfeel attributes play a role in children's liking as well as their ability to discriminate between chocolate milks containing different amounts of fat, with chocolate milk containing at least 1% fat preferred. The sensory quality of school lunch milk is vital to child preference, and processing efforts are needed to maximize school milk sensory quality.     

Physical properties of yogurt fortified with various commercial whey protein concentrates

The effects of whey protein concentrates on physical and rheological properties of yogurt were studied. Five commercial whey protein concentrates (340 g kg^?1 protein nominal) were used to fortify milk to 45 g protein kg^?1. Fermentation was performed with two different starters (ropy and non‐ropy). Resulting yogurts were compared with a control yogurt enriched with skim milk powder. The water‐holding capacity of the yogurt fortified with skim milk powder was 500 g kg^?1 and ranged from 600 to 638 g kg^?1 when fortified with whey protein concentrates. Significant rheological differences have been noticed between the yogurts fortified with different whey protein concentrates, independent of the starter used. Three whey protein concentrates generated yogurts with a behavior similar to the control. The two others produced yogurt with lower firmness (15 g compared with 17 g), lower Brookfield viscosity (6 Pa s compared with 9 Pa s), lower yield stress (2 Pa compared with 4 Pa), lower complex viscosity (13 Pa s compared with 26 Pa s), and lower apparent viscosity (0.4 Pa s compared with 1 Pa s) than the control, respectively. The yogurts with the lowest firmness and viscosity were produced with concentrates which contained the highest amount of non‐protein nitrogen fraction (160 g kg^?1 versus 126 g kg^?1 of the total nitrogen), and the highest amount of denaturation of the whey protein (262 versus 200 g kg^?1 of the total nitrogen). Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

甘氨酸螯合铁纳米脂质体对铁强化牛奶氧化稳定性和感官质量的影响

研究了以甘氨酸螯合铁纳米脂质体作为铁强化剂对牛奶氧化稳定性和感官质量的影响。通过反相蒸发法以蛋黄卵磷脂为主要壁材制备出了具有良好球形结构和均匀粒径分布的甘氨酸螯合铁纳米脂质体,将其加入牛奶中进行铁强化。分别用硫代巴比妥酸法、色差分析、粘度测定和浊度测定对牛奶铁强化前后及其贮藏期间的氧化稳定性和感官质量进行评价。结果表明:与以硫酸亚铁和甘氨酸螯合铁作为铁强化剂相比,以甘氨酸螯合铁纳米脂质体为铁强化剂的强化奶的脂质氧化程度更低,组织状态更稳定。