Acarbose in NIDDM patients with poor control on conventional oral agents. A 24-week placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of acarbose, compared with placebo, on the metabolic control of NIDDM patients inadequately controlled on maximal doses of conventional oral agents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this three-center double-blind study, 90 Chinese NIDDM patients with persistent poor glycemic control despite maximal doses of sulfonylurea and metformin were randomly assigned to receive additional treatment with acarbose 100 mg thrice daily or placebo for 24 weeks, after 6 weeks of dietary reinforcement. Efficacy was assessed by changes in HbA1c, fasting and 1-h postprandial plasma glucose and insulin levels, and fasting lipid levels. RESULTS: Acarbose treatment was associated with significantly greater reductions in HbA1c (-0.5 +/- 0.2% vs. placebo 0.1 +/- 0.2% [means +/- SEM], P = 0.038), 1-h postprandial glucose (-2.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/l vs. placebo 0.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/l, P < 0.001) and body weight (-0.54 +/- 0.32 kg vs. placebo 0.42 +/- 0.29 kg, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding changes in fasting plasma glucose and lipids or fasting and postprandial insulin levels. Flatulence was the most common side effect (acarbose vs. placebo: 28/45 vs. 11/44, P < 0.05). One patient on acarbose had asymptomatic elevations in serum transaminases that normalized in 4 weeks after acarbose withdrawal. Another patient on acarbose developed severe hypoglycemia; glycemic control was subsequently maintained on half the baseline dosage of sulfonylurea. CONCLUSIONS: In NIDDM patients inadequately controlled on conventional oral agents, acarbose in moderate doses resulted in beneficial effects on glycemic control, especially postprandial glycemia, and mean body weight. Additional use of acarbose can be considered as a useful alternative in such patients if they are reluctant to accept insulin therapy.     

Efficacy and safety of acarbose in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of acarbose compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and metformin (2,000 or 2,500 mg/day in divided doses). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study had a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group comparison design. The trial lasted 31 weeks and consisted of a 1-week screening period, a 6-week placebo pretreatment period, and a 24-week period of acarbose or placebo, with a forced titration from 25-50 mg t.i.d. and a titration of 50-100 mg tid that was based on glucose control. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from baseline in HbA1c. Secondary efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, serum insulin, and triglyceride levels. RESULTS: The addition of acarbose to patients on background metformin and diet therapy showed a statistically significant reduction in mean HbA1c of 0.65%. There were statistically significant reductions in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and serum insulin levels compared with placebo. Gastrointestinal side effects were more frequently reported in the acarbose-treated patients. No significant differences in liver transaminase elevations were observed between patients treated with acarbose and those treated with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the addition of acarbose to patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with metformin and diet is safe and generally well tolerated and that it significantly lowers HbA1c and fasting and postprandial glucose and insulin levels.     

Efficacy and safety of acarbose in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of acarbose compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group comparison study was conducted. The trial was 26 weeks with a 2-week screening period and a 24-week period of treatment with acarbose or placebo, with forced titration from 25 mg t.i.d. to 50 mg t.i.d. after 4 weeks, and titration of 50 mg t.i.d. to 100 mg t.i.d. after 12 weeks based on glucose control. The dosage of insulin was to remain stable. The primary efficacy variable was mean change from baseline in HbA1c, and secondary efficacy variables included mean changes in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and triglyceride levels. RESULTS: The addition of acarbose to the treatment of patients receiving background insulin and diet therapy resulted in a statistically significant reduction in mean HbA1c of 0.69% compared with placebo. There were statistically significant reductions in postprandial plasma glucose and glucose area under the curve, and in postprandial serum triglyceride levels in the acarbose-treated patients. Gastrointestinal side effects were more frequently reported in the acarbose-treated patients. There were no significant differences in hypoglycemic events or liver transaminase elevations between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the addition of acarbose to patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with insulin and diet is safe and generally well tolerated and that it significantly lowers HbA1c and postprandial glucose levels.     

The effect of metformin on the metabolic abnormalities associated with upper-body fat distribution. BIGPRO Study Group

OBJECTIVE: The constellation of anomalies associated with insulin resistance is a plausible additional cause of ischemic cardiovascular disease and of NIDDM. To test this hypothesis in a primary prevention trial, the effects of metformin as a potential candidate for intervention in the insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) were evaluated in 324 middle-aged subjects with upper-body obesity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Trial patients were selected on the basis of a high waist-to-hip ratio. They were randomly allocated to receive either metformin or placebo, following a double-blind procedure. After 1 year of treatment, the main clinical and biological parameters of the IRS were assessed and their evolution compared between treatment groups. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, metformin induced a significant weight loss, a better maintenance of fasting blood glucose, total and LDL cholesterol levels, and a greater decrease of fasting plasma insulin concentration. Moreover, tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen, a marker of fibrinolytic impairment, showed a significant decrease under metformin. By contrast, metformin treatment had no significant effect on blood pressure or serum triglyceride and HDL cholesterol concentrations. The main side effect of metformin was diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: The BIGuanides and Prevention of Risks in Obesity (BIGPRO1) results suggest that metformin would be a suitable candidate for long-term intervention for the prevention of diabetes but that its use in a trial of primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases requires either a reevaluation of its properties toward the most potentially atherogenic anomalies of the IRS or a better definition of the target population.     

A risk-benefit appraisal of acarbose in the management of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Acarbose is an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor proposed for the treatment of diabetic patients. It acts by competitively inhibiting the alpha-glucosidases in the intestinal brush border. The principal action of these enzymes is to convert nonabsorbable dietary starch and sucrose into absorbable monosaccharides (e.g. glucose). Enzyme inhibitors delay this conversion, slowing the formation and consequently the absorption of monosaccharides, and thus reducing the concentration of postprandial blood glucose. Both starch and sucrose are influenced, whereas lactose and glucose are not. Many studies in experimental animals, healthy volunteers and patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) have shown that acarbose decreases postprandial blood glucose, with a lesser reduction of fasting blood glucose, plasma triglycerides and postprandial insulin levels. In long term studies in NIDDM patients, acarbose significantly reduced glycosylated haemoglobin levels. Acarbose is only minimally absorbed from the gut and no systemic adverse effects have been demonstrated after long term administration. The drug allows undigested carbohydrates to pass into the large bowel where they are fermented causing flatulence, bloating and diarrhoea. These symptoms, which occur in approximately 30 to 60% of patients, tend to decrease with time and seem to be dose-dependent. They are minimised by starting therapy with low doses (such as 50mg 3 times daily) which may be effective in many patients. An increase in serum hepatic transaminases observed in earlier studies in the US, where doses of acarbose up to 900mg daily were used, has been not reported with the lower doses of the drug actually recommended [150 to 300mg (up to 600mg) daily]. In conclusion, acarbose may be useful in patients with NIDDM when diet alone is no longer able to maintain satisfactory blood glucose control. Furthermore, it may be a valid alternative to sulphonylurea or biguanide therapy when these drugs are contraindicated and insulin administration may be delayed. Acarbose seems also to be a useful adjunct to hypoglycaemic oral agents but its precise role in this field has not been fully clarified.     

The efficacy and safety of miglitol therapy compared with glibenclamide in patients with NIDDM inadequately controlled by diet alone

OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effects of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol (BAY m 1099), the sulfonylurea glibenclamide, and placebo on parameters of metabolic control and safety in patients with NIDDM that is inadequately controlled by diet alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 201 patients in 18 centers in 4 countries were randomized in a double-blind manner to miglitol (50 mg t.i.d., followed by 100 mg t.i.d.), glibenclamide (3.5 mg q.d/b.i.d.), or placebo for 24 weeks. Efficacy criteria were changes from baseline of HbA1c, fasting and postprandial blood glucose and insulin levels, body weight, and serum triglycerides. RESULTS: Efficacy was assessed in 119 patients who completed the full protocol, and the results were similar to those obtained in 186 patients who fulfilled the validity criteria for analysis. Compared with placebo, mean baseline-adjusted HbA1c decreased by 0.75% (P = 0.0021) and 1.01% (P = 0.0001) in the miglitol and glibenclamide treatment groups, respectively. Blood glucose decreased slightly in the fasting state and considerably in the postprandial state in both treatment groups but not in the placebo group. Fasting insulin levels increased slightly (NS) in all treatment groups; however, postprandial insulin levels decreased with miglitol, while increasing markedly with glibenclamide (P = 0.0001 between all treatment groups). Gastrointestinal side effects (flatulence and diarrhea) occurred mostly in the miglitol-treated patients, while some glibenclamide-treated patients had symptoms suggestive of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Miglitol monotherapy is effective and safe in NIDDM patients. Compared with glibenclamide, it reduced HbA1c less effectively and caused more gastrointestinal side effects. On the other hand, glibenclamide, unlike miglitol, tended to cause hypoglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and weight gain, which are not desirable in patients with NIDDM.     

New imidazoles as probes of the active site topology and potent inhibitors of beta-glucosidase

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol in the treatment of African-American patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 345 African-American type 2 diabetic patients (mean age 55.6 years, BMI 31.9 kg/m2, duration of diabetes 4.9 years, baseline HbA1C 8.7%) treated with either diet alone or sulfonylurea were randomized to 1 year of double-blind treatment with either placebo (n = 117) or miglitol (n = 228) at doses of 50 or 100 mg t.i.d., titrated based on tolerability. The primary efficacy criterion was change from baseline in HbA1C at the 6-month visit. Secondarily efficacy parameters included changes from baseline in plasma glucose and serum insulin (both fasting and 120 min after a standardized test meal), fasting lipids, and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Safety and tolerability evaluations were primarily based on reporting of adverse events and symptoms and on periodic laboratory analyses. RESULTS: Miglitol treatment was associated with a mean placebo-subtracted reduction in HbA1C from baseline of 1.19% at 6 months. Fasting and 120-min postprandial plasma glucose levels were reduced in parallel to HbA1C, in association with miglitol treatment. Significant reductions versus placebo in 120-min postprandial insulin levels, in LDL cholesterol, and in fasting triglycerides, were also seen in the miglitol group at individual study time points. Softer, more frequent stools and flatulence were significantly more common in the miglitol group. Urinary tract infections, hematuria, and herpes simplex infections were significantly more common in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Miglitol treatment appears to be at least as efficacious in the African-American type 2 population as in the U.S. type 2 population at large, with comparable tolerability. alpha-Glucosidase treatment may be an important therapeutic option in these patients in view of their greater risk for microvascular complications and the accumulating body of evidence that better glucose control reduces the risk of these complications.     

Does suppression of postprandial blood glucose excursions by the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol improve insulin sensitivity in diet-treated type II diabetic patients?

OBJECTIVE: Insulin sensitivity is impaired in patients with type II diabetes and is exacerbated by high mean blood glucose (BG). Potentially, large postprandial swings in BG could result in further decrements of insulin sensitivity. Because alpha-glucosidase inhibitors cause a marked reduction in the amplitude of BG changes, the aim of this study was to determine if such a BG-smoothing effect improves insulin sensitivity in well-controlled type II diabetic subjects treated with diet alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients received either miglitol (BAY m 1099) (50 mg three times daily) or placebo for 8 weeks in a randomized double-blind parallel study. The miglitol (9 men, 2 women) and placebo (7 men, 3 women) groups were well matched (mean +/- SD) for age, weight, and blood glucose control (fasting BG, 6.4 +/- 1.0 vs. 6.9 +/- 1.6 mmol/l; HbA1, 7.7 +/- 1.0 vs. 7.9 +/- 0.4%; fructosamine, 0.99 +/- 0.08 vs. 1.07 +/- 0.17 mmol/l). The glucose metabolic clearance rate was calculated during the last 30 min of a 150 min glucose/insulin sensitivity test (glucose, 6 mg . kg-1 . min-1; insulin, 0.5 U . kg-1 . min-1). RESULTS: There was no significant improvement in metabolic clearance rate (0.21 +/- 0.27 vs. 0.16 +/- 0.35 l . kg-1 . min-1) for the miglitol- and placebo-treated groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between miglitol and placebo for changes from baseline in BG (0.1 +/- 0.1 vs. -0.1 +/- 0.2 mmol/l), HbA1 (0.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.1%), and fructosamine (-0.06 +/- 0.02 vs. -0.03 +/- 0.02 mmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: Alpha-glucosidase-induced improvement in postprandial hyperglycemia does not result in increased insulin sensitivity.     

The effect of acarbose on insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of acarbose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, on postprandial plasma glucose and insulin and insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subjects with IGT were randomly treated in a double-blind fashion with placebo (n = 10) or acarbose (n = 8) at 100 mg t.i.d. for 4 months. All subjects were submitted before randomization and at the end of the study to a standardized breakfast and a 12-h daytime plasma glucose and plasma insulin profile, and insulin sensitivity was measured as steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) using the insulin suppression test. RESULTS: While placebo had no effect on postprandial plasma glucose and plasma insulin incremental area under the curve (AUC) (3.03 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.76 +/- 0.6 mmol.h-1.l-1, P = NS; 1,488 +/- 229 vs. 1,609 +/- 253 pmol.h-1.l-1, P = NS), acarbose resulted in a significant reduction for both glucose (1.44 +/- 0.3 vs. 4.45 +/- 0.9 mmol.h-1.l-1, P = 0.002) and insulin (626.7 +/- 104.3 vs. 1,338.3 +/- 220.5 pmol.h-1.l-1, P = 0.003). The reduction in 12-h plasma glucose and insulin AUC on acarbose (11.2 +/- 2.1 mmol.h-1.l-1 and 7.5 +/- 0.7 nmol.h-1.l-1) was significantly greater than that on placebo (4.0 +/- 1.6 mmol.h-1.l-1 and 0.8 +/- 0.4 nmol.h-1.l-1) (P = 0.014 and 0.041). While SSPG was not affected by placebo (13.9 +/- 0.4 vs. 13.8 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; P = NS), it was significantly improved by acarbose (10.9 +/- 1.4 vs. 13.1 +/- 1.5 mmol/l, P < 0.004) and was also significantly different from placebo at 4 months (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that in subjects with IGT, acarbose treatment decreases postprandial plasma glucose and insulin and improves insulin sensitivity. Acarbose may therefore be potentially useful to prevent the progression of IGT to NIDDM.     

No relationship between carbohydrate intake and effect of acarbose on HbA1c or gastrointestinal symptoms in type 2 diabetic subjects consuming 30-60% of energy from carbohydrate

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between carbohydrate intake and the effect of acarbose on HbA1c in subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with acarbose alone, acarbose plus sulfonylurea, acarbose plus metformin, or acarbose plus insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study in which subjects with diabetes in four treatment strata (77 on diet alone, 83 treated with metformin, 103 treated with sulfonylurea, and 91 treated with insulin) were randomized to treatment with placebo or acarbose for 12 months. Before randomization, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after randomization, fasting blood was obtained for HbA1c, and 3-day diet records were collected. Subjects who completed at least 6 months of acarbose therapy and provided at least three 3-day diet records were included. RESULTS: In the 114 subjects included in this analysis, carbohydrate intake varied from approximately 30-60% of energy There was no significant relationship between carbohydrate intake and change in HbA1c in any of the four treatment strata (diet: n=26, r=0.35, P=0.076; metformin: n=27, r=0.26, P=0.19; sulfonylurea: n=35, r=0.24, P=0.16; insulin: n=25, r=-0.27, P=0.19). In the 80 subjects consuming <50% of energy from carbohydrate, the fall in HbA1c (7.83 +/-0.17% at baseline to 6.72+/-0.13% on acarbose, P < 0.001) was no different from that of the 34 subjects consuming >50% of energy from carbohydrate (7.55+/-0.25% at baseline to 6.66+/-0.23% on acarbose, P < 0.001). There was no difference in carbohydrate intake between those who dropped out of the study because of gastrointestinal side effects and those who did not, and there was no relationship between severity of symptoms and the composition of the diet. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with type 2 diabetes consuming 30-60% of energy from carbohydrate, the effect of acarbose on HbA1c and gastrointestinal symptoms was not related to carbohydrate intake. Because most people consume at least 30% of energy from carbohydrate, we conclude that no special diet is needed for acarbose to be effective in improving blood glucose control in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.     

Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in endogenous hypercortisolism: shared features with metabolic syndrome X and NIDDM

Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism was cross-sectionally assessed in 16 patients with endogenous hypercortisolism (endogenous Cushing syndrome). Five patients (31%) had fasting glucose levels over 6.6 mmol/l and a HbA1C over 7.5%. Six patients (38%) had diabetes mellitus based on an abnormal 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and two additional patients (13%) had impaired glucose tolerance based on an OGTT. Compared to obese individuals, patients with Cushing syndrome had an elevated glucose but no elevated insulin response to the OGTT. Regression analysis showed positive correlations between 24-h urinary free cortisol (UFC) and fasting blood glucose (P < 0.0005), UFC and OGTT glucose area under the curve (AUC) (P < 0.01), and UFC and HbA1C (P < 0.005). UFC levels were negatively correlated (P < 0.05) with OGTT insulin AUC and insulin/glucose ratios. Eleven (69%) patients required anti-hypertensive therapy for blood pressure control. Total cholesterol and triglycerides were elevated in patients with Cushing syndrome compared to obese controls, while LDL and HDL cholesterol, and Lp(a) were similar in the two groups. We conclude that impaired glucose tolerance and/or diabetes in patients with endogenous Cushing syndrome is due to the hyperglycemic effects of cortisol with relative insulinopenia. Thus, Cushing syndrome shares features with both the Metabolic Syndrome X and NIDDM, including impaired glucose uptake, hyperlipidemia and hypertension. However, in Cushing syndrome, a relative insulinopenia occurs, while in Metabolic Syndrome X and NIDDM, insulin excess is observed. In Cushing syndrome, as the hypercortisolemia exacerbates, insulinopenia becomes more paramount, suggesting that cortisol exerts a direct or indirect "toxic" effect on the beta-cell.     

Hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance are associated with multiple abnormalities of lipoprotein subclasses in glucose-tolerant relatives of NIDDM patients. Botnia Study Group

We studied the subclasses of plasma lipoproteins in normolipidemic, glucose-tolerant male relatives of noninsulin dependent diabetic patients (NIDDM), who represented either the lowest (n = 14) or the highest (n = 18) quintiles of fasting plasma insulin. The higher plasma triglyceride level in the high insulin group (1.61 mmol/l vs. 0.87 mmol/l, P < 0.001) was due to multiple differences in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. The concentrations of larger VLDL1, smaller VLDL2 particles, and IDL particles were 3.8-fold, 2.5-fold, and 1.5-fold higher, respectively, in the high insulin group than in the low insulin group (P < 0.01 or less). In addition, hyperinsulinemic subjects had VLDL1, VLDL2, and IDL particles enriched in lipids and poor in protein. The lower plasma HDL cholesterol level in the high insulin group (1.20 mmol/l vs. 1.44 mmol/l, P < 0.01) compared to the low insulin group was a consequence of a 27% reduction of HDL2a concentration (P < 0.05) and a significantly reduced percentage of cholesterol in HDL3a, HDL3b, and HDL3c subclasses. On the other hand, the percentages of triglycerides in HDL2b, HDL2a, HDL3a, and HDL3b subclasses were 76%, 79%, 61%, and 50% higher, respectively, in the high insulin group than in the low insulin group (P < 0.01 or less). In the combined group, the concentration of VLDL1 and VLDL2 correlated positively with the concentrations of LDL2 and LDL3 and negatively with HDL2b and HDL2a subclasses (P < 0.05 or less). In conclusion, normolipidemic, glucose-tolerant but hyperinsulinemic relatives of NIDDM patients have qualitatively similar lipoprotein abnormalities as NIDDM patients. These abnormalities are not observed in insulin-sensitive relatives, suggesting that they develop in concert with insulin resistance.     

Relationship between gastric emptying and an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor effect on postprandial hyperglycemia in NIDDM patients

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between gastric emptying and the efficacy of an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor in NIDDM patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen NIDDM patients (4 patients treated with diet therapy alone and 12 receiving a sulfonylurea) were given 0.6 mg of voglibose daily for 4 weeks. The efficacy of voglibose was assessed by measurement of HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and 45- and 120-min postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) and serum insulin concentrations before and after the 4 weeks of voglibose therapy. Gastric emptying was evaluated using the proportional cumulative area under the absorption curve (% AUC) of plasma acetaminophen concentration at 60 min after ingestion of a liquid test meal containing 20 mg/kg of acetaminophen. These measurements were also taken before and after the therapy. RESULTS: The change in the 45-min PPG levels from the fasting state correlated significantly with the % AUC of the plasma acetaminophen concentrations (r = 0.625, P = 0.0096) before the voglibose administrations. The mean 45-min and 2-h PPG levels were reduced significantly after 4 weeks of voglibose (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Two-hour postprandial serum insulin concentrations were also significantly reduced at the end of the treatment period (P < 0.05). The changes in the PPG levels between pre- and posttreatment periods correlated significantly with the % AUC of the plasma acetaminophen concentrations before the treatment period (r = 0.499, P = 0.0490; r = 0.713, P = 0.0019, respectively). There was no significant difference in the plasma acetaminophen concentrations between pre- and posttreatment periods. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of gastric emptying affects the efficacy of voglibose therapy in NIDDM patients. Voglibose did not however alter the rate of gastric emptying.     

Clinical experience with an alpha glucosidase inhibitor (acarbose) in the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Acarbose, an alpha glucosidase inhibitor is a drug used in the treatment of non insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, that interferes with the intestinal absorption of monosaccharides. AIM: To study the effect of acarbose in non insulin dependent diabetic patients that had an inadequate metabolic control with diet and sulphonylureas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Diabetic patients received acarbose, 150 mg/day during four weeks and this dose was increased to 300 mg/day during 3 months. Afterwards, patients were followed for a period of 12 weeks without acarbose. Fasting and post-prandial blood glucose and glycosilated hemoglobin were measured sequentially during the study. RESULTS: Eighty five patients were recruited for the study but 64 complied with the treatment protocol. The age of these patients was 56 +/- 8.8 years old, their diabetes duration was 7.8 +/- 8.8 years and their body mass index was 27.6 +/- 3.6 kg/m2. During acarbose treatment, glycosilated hemoglobin decreased from 8.36 +/- 1.33 to 7.71+ 1.7% (p < 0.001), fasting blood glucose decreased from 173 +/- 48 to 159 +/- 59 mg/dl (p < 0.03) and post-prandial blood glucose decreased from 254 +/- 80 to 241 +/- 80 mg/dl (NS). After discontinuing acarbose glycosilated hemoglobin and blood glucose levels returned to basal levels. Body weight and blood pressure did not change during the treatment period. Fifty nine patients had gastrointestinal symptoms (meteorism, flatulence and abdominal distention) that were mild in 59% and moderate in 39%. Episodes of hypoglycemia were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Acarbose, associated to sulphonylureas is an effective drug to reduce blood glucose and glycosilated hemoglobin levels in patients with non insulin dependent diabetes.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of S(-)-methcathinone (CAT): a potent stimulant drug of abuse

Elevated circulating plasma nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) may contribute to the insulin resistance and hyperglycemia of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and decreasing plasma NEFA could provide a therapeutic benefit. A sustained-release preparation of acipimox, a lipolysis inhibitor, was used in an attempt to decrease circulating plasma NEFA levels long-term, and the effects on glycemic control, insulin resistance, and serum lipids were measured. Sixty NIDDM patients (43 males and 17 females) took part in a randomized controlled trial of acipimox or placebo for 12 weeks. Fasting plasma NEFA levels did not change in acipimox-treated patients (baseline v 12 weeks, 0.84 +/- 0.35 v 0.88 +/- 0.55 mmol x L(-1), mean +/- SD). Fasting blood glucose was unchanged (mean difference v placebo, -0.5 mmol x L(-1); 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.4 to 0.3 mmol x L[-1]), but serum fructosamine decreased (mean difference v placebo, -26 micromol x L(-1); 95% CI, -51 to 0 mmol x L[-1]), as did the standardized hemoglobin A1 ([HbA1] mean difference v placebo, -1.4%; 95% CI, -3.0% to -0.1%). Insulin resistance measured as steady-state plasma glucose during an insulin-dextrose infusion test was unchanged (mean difference v placebo, -1.4 mmol x L(-1); 95% CI, -3.2 to 0.5 mmol x L[-1]). Serum total cholesterol (mean difference v placebo, -0.4 mmol x L(-1); 95% CI, -0.6 to -0.1 mmol x L[-1]), serum apolipoprotein B ([apo B] mean difference v placebo, -0.19 g x L(-1); 95% CI, -0.3 to -0.1 g x L[-1]), and serum triglycerides (mean difference v placebo for pretreatment v posttreatment ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.88) were all lower with acipimox. Serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mean difference v placebo, 0.10 mmol x L(-1); 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.3 mmol x L[-1]), serum apo A1 (mean difference v placebo, 0.03 g x L(-1); 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.1 g x L[-1]), and serum lipoprotein(a) ([Lp(a)] acipimox v placebo, 154 (0 to 1,574) v 71 (0 to 1,009), median and range) were unchanged. Despite the lack of change in fasting plasma NEFA levels, acipimox caused a modest beneficial improvement in overall glycemic control and plasma lipids in NIDDM patients and could be a useful agent in the treatment of dyslipidemic NIDDM patients.     

Small weight loss on long-term acarbose therapy with no change in dietary pattern or nutrient intake of individuals with non-insulin-dependent diabetes

OBJECTIVES: To see if the long-term treatment of non-insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM) with the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose affects food intake and body weight. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design clinical trial of 12 months duration. SUBJECTS: Subjects with NIDDM in four treatment strata: 77 on diet alone, 83 also treated with metformin, 103 also treated with sulfonylurea and 91 also treated with insulin. MEASUREMENTS: Two 3 day diet records were obtained before randomization to acarbose or placebo therapy, and additional 3 day diet records were obtained at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomization. Body weight was also measured at these times. RESULTS: Of the 354 subjects randomized, 279 (79%) completed at least 9 months of therapy and, of these, 263 (94%) provided at least one diet record during the baseline period and two diet records during the treatment period. After one year, subjects on acarbose had lost 0.46 +/- 0.28 kg, which differed significantly from the 0.33 +/- 0.25 kg weight gain on placebo (P = 0.027). The difference in weight change between acarbose and placebo did not differ significantly in the different treatment strata. Being in the study had significant effects on diet, including a reduction in energy intake from 1760-1700 Kcal/d (P < 0.05), a reduction in simple sugars intake from 18.5-17.4% of energy (P < 0.001), and reductions in the number of different foods consumed (33-30, P < 0.001) and the number of meals eaten per day (4.7-4.3, P < 0.001). However, compared to placebo treatment, acarbose had no effect on energy intake, nutrient intakes, or dietary patterns. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with NIDDM on weight-maintaining diets, long-term acarbose therapy results in a small weight loss, but has no effect on energy or nutrient intakes. The weight loss induced by acarbose may be due partly to reduced doses of concomitant oral agents and insulin and partly to energy loss due to increased colonic fermentation.     

Modification of postprandial hyperglycemia with insulin lispro improves glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: Insulin lispro is a rapid-acting analog of human insulin that can be used to target the postprandial rise in plasma glucose. We designed an open-label randomized crossover study of type 2 diabetic patients with secondary failure of sulfonylurea therapy to determine whether improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia would affect total daily glucose control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five type 2 diabetic patients who were poorly controlled on a maximum dose of sulfonylureas were studied in a university hospital clinical research center. In one arm of the study, patients continued therapy with maximum-dose sulfonylureas. In the other arm, patients used a combination therapy with insulin lispro before meals and sulfonylureas. After 4 months, patients were crossed over to the opposite arm. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 1- and 2-h postprandial glucose (after a standardized meal), HbA1c, total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were measured at the end of each arm of the study. RESULTS: Insulin lispro in combination with sulfonylurea therapy significantly reduced 2-h postprandial glucose concentrations compared with sulfonylureas alone, from 18.6 to 14.2 mmol/l (P < 0.0001), and incremental postprandial glucose area from 617.8 to 472.9 mmol.min.1-1 (P < 0.0007). FPG levels were decreased from 10.9 to 8.5 mmol/l (P < 0.0001), and HbA1c values were reduced form 9.0 to 7.1% (P < 0.0001). Total cholesterol was significantly decreased in the lispro arm from 5.44 to 5.10 mmol/l (P < 0.02). HDL cholesterol concentrations were increased in the lispro arm from 0.88 to 0.96 mmol/l (P < 0.01). The patients weighed significantly more after lispro therapy than after sulfonylureas alone, but the difference was small in absolute terms (sulfonylurea therapy alone, 90.6 kg; lispro therapy, 93.8 kg; P < 0.0001). Two episodes of hypoglycemia (glucose concentrations, < 2.8 mmol/l) were reported by the patients while using lispro. CONCLUSIONS: Previously, it has not been possible to address the effect of treatment of postprandial hyperglycemia specifically. We have now shown that the treatment of postprandial hyperglycemia with insulin lispro markedly improves overall glucose control and some lipid parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of acarbose for the treatment of patients with insulin-requiring type II diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a forced titration of acarbose (from 50 to 300 mg three times daily) administered over a 24-week period, in conjunction with diet and insulin therapy, improves glycemic control and reduces daily insulin requirements in insulin-requiring type II diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was 36 weeks in duration. The trial consisted of a 6-week pretreatment period, a 24-week double-blind treatment period, and a 6-week post-treatment follow-up period. The primary efficacy variables were the mean change from baseline in HbA1c levels and the mean percentage change from baseline in total daily insulin dose. RESULTS: Treatment with acarbose was associated with significant reductions in HbA1c levels of 0.40% (P = 0.0001) and in total daily insulin dose of 8.3% (P = 0.0015). There were also significant reductions in all plasma glucose variables measured, including a 0.9 mmol/l reduction in fasting glucose (P = 0.0440), a 2.6 mmol/l reduction in glucose Cmax (P = 0.0001) and a 270 mmol.min-1.l-1 reduction in glucose area under the curve (P = 0.0002). Although acarbose treatment was associated with a greater incidence of adverse events than was placebo treatment, primarily flatulence and diarrhea, these events did not generally prevent patients from completing the study. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that acarbose is a safe and effective adjunct to diet and insulin therapy for the management of insulin-requiring type II diabetes.     

Plasma PAF acetylhydrolase in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and obesity: effect of hyperinsulinemia and lovastatin treatment

Insulin resistance is characterized principally by impaired insulin-mediated glucose uptake which provokes a compensatory increase in pancreatic beta-cell secretory activity. For a time this may produce well-controlled plasma glucose levels but as the insulin resistance worsens the augmented insulin production becomes inadequate to keep plasma glucose at euglycemia leading to the development of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), accompanied by hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. A number of metabolic defects are associated with NIDDM including obesity, hypercoagulability, cardiovascular disease risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia and these constitute the insulin resistance syndrome. The identity of the biochemical factor that might link all these defects is not yet known. We have hypothesized that platelet-activating factor (1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, PAF) may be such a link. In this study, we measured plasma acetylhydrolase (EC.1.1.48), which degrades PAF to the inactive metabolise lyso-PAF, as a surrogate for PAF activity in three groups of hypercholesterolemic subjects: lean controls (n = 9), non-diabetic obese (n = 6) and NIDDM subjects (n = 6). The ages and body mass indices of the subjects were 46 +/- 3.1 and 24.2 +/- 2.2 for the lean controls, 52 +/- 2.5 and 28.7 +/- 0.9 for the NIDDM subjects and 60 +/- 2 and 27.6 +/- 2.1 for the obese, non-diabetic subjects (mean +/- S.E.M.). The measurements were made before and after therapy with the cholesterol-lowering drug lovastatin, a 3-hydroxy 3 methylglutaryl (HMG) coenzyme. A reductase inhibitor (40 mg/day) for 3 months. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were 91 +/- 11, 96 +/- 3 and 146 +/- 11 mg/dl, for the lean, obese and NIDDM subjects, respectively, before therapy began. Lovastatin did not affect FPG in any of the three subject groups. Before treatment, the fasting plasma insulin (FPI) levels were 6.1 +/- 0.92, 10.83 +/- 2.03 and 14.68 +/- 3.64 mU/l for the lean, non-diabetic obese and NIDDM subjects, respectively. After lovastatin therapy only the obese group exhibited a significant change in FPI (15.35 +/- 2.47 mU/l) (P < 0.05). Total cholesterol levels were similar in all three groups both before and after lovastatin therapy but within each group lovastatin therapy significantly reduced the total cholesterol by 32, 29 and 34% in the lean, obese and NIDDM subject groups respectively (P < 0.0001). Lovastatin therapy reduced LDL-cholesterol levels by 40, 32 and 46% in the lean, obese and NIDDM subjects, respectively, but produced no significant effect on HDL or triglyceride levels. Before therapy, the plasma acetylyhydrolase activities were 104 +/- 7, 164 +/- 7 and 179 +/- 7 nmol/ml per min in the lean, obese and NIDDM subjects, respectively. Lovastatin therapy reduced plasma acetylhydrolase levels to 70 +/- 7, 87 +/- 6 and 86 +/- 7 nmol/ml per min in the lean, obese and NIDDM subjects, respectively. Plasma acetylhydrolase activity was predominantly (> 80%) associated with LDL cholesterol both before and after lovastatin treatment. Also, plasma acetylhydrolase activity significantly correlated with fasting plasma insulin levels before lovastatin therapy but not after. Taken together, this study clearly implicates PAF metabolism in three defects associated with the insulin resistance syndrome: hypercholesterolemia, obesity and NIDDM. Additionally, we conclude that chronic hyperinsulinemia may play a significant role in the production of plasma acetylhydrolase.     

Postprandial cholesteryl ester transfer and high density lipoprotein composition in normotriglyceridemic non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients

Altered postprandial HDL metabolism is a possible cause of defective reverse cholesterol transport and increased cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients with a normal fasting lipoprotein profile. Ten normolipidemic, normoponderal non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients and seven controls received a 980 kcal meal containing 78 g lipids with 100 000 IU vitamin A. Chylomicron clearance was not different, but area under the curve (AUC) for retinyl palmitate in chylimicron-free serum (remnant clearance) was greater in patients (P < 0.02). LCAT activity increased postprandially to the same extent in both groups. In control subjects, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity (CETA) also increased by 20% (P < 0.01 at 6 h) in parallel with a 20% decrease in HDL2-CE (r = -0.55, P = 0.009). In NIDDM patients, on the contrary, CETA which was 35% higher in the fasting state (P < 0.005), decreased postprandially yet HDL2-CE remained unchanged. Postprandial HDL3 of controls were enriched with phospholipid (PL) (30.3 +/- 2.6% at 6 h) with respect to fasting (25.6 +/- 2.5%, P < 0.01) and to NIDDM-HDL3 (25.8 +/- 1.7% at 6 h, P < 0.01). These results show that variation in plasma CETA has little impact on HDL2-CE in NIDDH subjects. They support the concept that, in controls, the combined enrichment of HDL3 with PL, increased LCAT and CETA create the conditions for stimulation of cell cholesterol efflux and CE transfer to apo B lipoproteins. In NIDDM, because of the lesser HDL3 enrichment with PL and of the inverse trend of CETA, these conditions fail to occur, depriving the patients of a potentially efficient mechanism of unesterified cholesterol (UC) clearance, despite their strictly normal preprandial profile.