Combination chemotherapy with Tegafur. Uracil (UFT), etoposide, adriamycin and cisplatinum (UFT-EAP) for advanced gastric cancer

Thirty-four patients with advanced gastric cancer were treated with combination chemotherapy employing Tegafur-Uracil (UFT), etoposide, Adriamycin, and Cisplatinum (CDDP) (UFT-EAP therapy). An objective partial response was obtained in 16 patients (47%) and the median duration of remission was 12.2 months. The 50% survival time for all 34 patients was 10 months. Patients with moderately or well differentiated adenocarcinoma responded well (13/19, 68%), while those with undifferentiated adenocarcinoma showed a poor response (3/15, 20%). Six responding patients were noted to have no evidence of viable cancer at the primary site by endoscopic biopsy, and underwent gastrectomies. The resected specimens showed complete disappearances of the primary tumors in four patients. The median survival time for the patients receiving gastrectomies was 24 months. The regimen was very well tolerated, apart from moderate bone marrow suppression. Our results suggest that patients with advanced gastric cancer can be effectively treated with UFT-EAP chemotherapy.     

The effect of intraperitoneal and intra-aortic chemotherapy for unresectable gastric cancer

Regional chemotherapy was given 16 unresectable gastric cancer patients. Two types of the chemotherapy, intraperitoneal (IP) and intraaortic (IA) administration, were carried out. The control group was comprised of 17 patients. The response of the chemotherapy for primary tumor was 36.4% in the IP group and 20% in the IA one. Among these patients, 2 of 11 in IP and 1 of 5 in IA were able to resect the primary tumor. The 50% survival time of IP, IA and control was 347, 227 and 78 days, respectively. One-year survival rates of IP, IA and control were 68%, 29% and 0%, respectively. IP showed a significantly longer survival rate than controls (p < 0.001). All but one patient was able to stay at home. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy showed both local and systemic effects in unresectable gastric cancer.     

Analysis of clinical effects of a concurrent CDDP/5-FU therapy on inoperable colon cancer

The mechanisms of synergic effects on cancer cells, the rational dose schedules resulting from these action mechanisms, and actual clinical results for inoperable colon cancer patients by a concurrent CDDP/5-FU therapy, are described. We analyzed the clinical results on the basis on the literature dealing with concurrent CDDP/5-FU therapy for inoperable colon cancer patients. This analysis suggested that some modified dose schedules of CDDP and 5-FU for inoperable colon cancer patients made no difference in response rates, survival times or adverse effects. Concurrent low-dose CDDP/5-FU therapy for inoperable colon cancer patients is now awaited in Japan.     

Ovarian metastases from primary gastrointestinal malignancies: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience and implications for adjuvant treatment

We investigated the pattern and frequency of ovarian metastases in patients with primary gastrointestinal malignancies and evaluated the response to surgery, chemotherapy and in three cases radiotherapy. The literature reports that this group of patients have a poor prognosis, but no report has specifically addressed the response to chemotherapy. Using a database which is generated prospectively, we analysed 51 patients with primary gastrointestinal malignancies and ovarian metastases. All patients received chemotherapy but only 36 were evaluable for response; five had adjuvant treatment and ten had non-measurable disease. Seventeen patients had surgical oophorectomy and three patients received radiotherapy. The overall response rate to chemotherapy was 22%; eight partial responses and no complete responses. When stratified according to site of response, 11 (31%) patients had a partial response at sites of extraovarian metastases and only five (14%) had a partial response in the ovaries. Seven patients with primary colorectal cancer had a differential response in favour of extraovarian sites. The median survival was 9 months for the 51 patients. Three premenopausal women with resected gastric carcinoma received adjuvant chemotherapy and relapsed only in the ovaries. In primary colorectal tumours the response of ovarian metastases to chemotherapy is less than that for other sites. Therefore, the ovary may be a sanctuary site for metastases which has important implications for adjuvant chemotherapy in women. These women could be followed up regularly by transvaginal ultrasonography to detect such metastases at an early stage when they would be amenable to surgical resection. Surgery should be considered for selected patients who develop metachronous metastases, as patients may be rendered disease free for several months.     

A specific conformation of the territory of chromosome 17 locates ERBB-2 sequences to a DNase-hypersensitive domain at the nuclear periphery

Oesophageal and gastric cancers are common tumors that represent a number of challenges for oncologists, gastroenterologists and surgeons. The prognosis remains poor with the majority of patients presenting with advanced disease. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy has demonstrated a survival benefit in patients with loco-regional oesophageal cancer compared to radiotherapy alone. In an interim analysis we have observed a 62% response rate using a chemoradiation regimen based on protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin combined with radiotherapy in patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer. Improved outcomes with loco-regional disease has rekindled interest in preoperative therapy. In a trial comparing preoperative chemoradiation to surgery alone in patients with operable oesophageal adenocarcinoma, survival was improved with multimodality treatment. In addition, a study including both adeno- and squamous carcinomas demonstrated a trend towards improved survival. A complete pathological response to chemoradiation was associated with significantly improved survival. Gastric cancer is one of the most chemosensitive solid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract with the majority of patients being suitable for palliative chemotherapy. The ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil) regimen was developed in the Gastrointestinal unit of the Royal Marsden Hospital and first reported in 1991. In a prospective randomised trial including 274 patients ECF has been compared with the standard combination of 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and methotrexate (FAMTX) in patients with previously untreated gastric cancer. Overall response rate, failure-free and overall survival were significantly improved with ECE, ECF also demonstrated improved quality of life and cost effectiveness when compared to the FAMTX regimen. ECF should now be regarded as the standard treatment for advanced oesophago-gastric cancer against which new therapies should be compared. In addition the Medical Research Council are conducting a trial randomising patients between surgery alone and perioperative chemotherapy using the ECF regimen in operable gastric cancer.     

Chemotherapy of colorectal carcinoma

The benefit of adjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) has been provided in clinical studies that have demonstrated reduction of up to 30% in a 5-year overall mortality in patients (pts.) with TNM stage III (Dukes' stage C) carcinoma. Patients with metastatic CRC are usually in a relatively good condition despite their advanced disease. Therefore, some clinicians wished to withheld the toxicity of chemotherapy until the disease became symptomatic. Others, however, felt it appropriate to treat patients early in the course of the disease. Four clinical trials may be cited addressing this clinical uncertainty (Table 1). Patients receiving chemotherapy had a significantly longer median survival in comparison with only best supportive care. The delay of the carrying out of systemic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic disease decreases the symptom free interval (2 vs. 10 months, p < 0.001), time to disease progression (3 vs. 8 months, p < 0.001) and median survival (14 versus 9 months, p < 0.02) compared to an early start of therapy [7C. Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer benefit from early chemotherapy in terms of survival and quality of life. It is clear that survival is determined by prognostic factors, mainly the performance status, which is a highly significant predictor of therapeutic response and overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Some authors suggests that the response is a potent and independent prognostic factor of survival, and that response can be used as surrogate marker of survival. Stable disease is a category in therapy response evaluation which is not included in the overall response rate. In many studies with a response rate below 20%, chemotherapy almost doubles the survival of patients. In most chemotherapy trials in advanced colorectal cancer patients, about 30-50% had stable disease. One of the possible reasons may be that in colorectal cancer stabilization of disease is a clinically relevant effect of chemotherapy. If we accept that disease stabilization is a clinically relevant effect of chemotherapy, should we continue with chemotherapy after 3 or 4 courses, and for how long, or should we stop treatment according to rules for stable disease, i.e. following 4 courses? The results of on study, which we performed in 99 patients with advanced colorectal cancer, indicate that under category of "stable disease" there are two different subpopulations of patients with quite different symptom responses as an effect of chemotherapy, different time to progression and possible different survival (Graph 1 and Graph 2). It seems that stable disease patients with clinical benefit could be a target group for policy "to treat until disease progression". The tumour response is likely to be positively correlated with improvement in quality of life when a patient is a symptomatic from cancer before the treatment. Stable disease patients without symptom improvement have no benefit from further chemotherapy and in these patients treatment should be stopped. Such selection would spare from toxicity stable disease patients without clinical benefit. We have no data whether different number of chemotherapy cycles in the groups of patients with and without clinical benefit could lead to a bias in survival estimation. Patients who achieved also a stable disease, but who were asymptomatic from the beginning of chemotherapy, and who are still asymptomatic after 4 chemotherapy courses, make a group for which is hard to make decision either to continue or to stop chemotherapy. We have treated and followed-up these stable disease patients as patients without clinical benefit. We have no answer if they could reach better time to progression and/or survival if they had been treated for more than 4 courses. Careful studies in the evaluation of the quality of life in connection with treatment effects for all stable disease subpopulations of patients are warranted. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)     

Retrospective comparison of infusional 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin-C (modified FAM) combination chemotherapy versus palliative therapy in treatment of advanced gastric cancer

About one-third of patients with gastric cancer are unresectable at the time of diagnosis. Their median survival is < 6 months, with a grave prognosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a modified FAM (mFAM) regimen in advanced gastric cancer. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 409 advanced gastric cancer patients who had not received curative surgery. Among 409 patients, 202 patients were treated with an mFAM regimen (infusional 5-FU + doxorubocin + mitomycin-C), and 207 patients received no chemotherapy (control group). No differences were found in clinical parameters between the two groups. The 1-year survival rates were 34.1% for the mFAM-treated group and 22.5% for the control group (p = 0.0135). In subset analysis, a higher 1-year survival rate was demonstrated in patients with mFAM and palliative surgery. Of the 154 evaluable patients in the mFAM-treated group, the response rate was 17.5%. In these patients, median response duration was 30 weeks, and progression-free survival was 23 weeks. Overall toxicity of mFAM regimen was relatively tolerable and reversible. In conclusion, FAM combination chemotherapy, which has been used as a standard therapy, prolonged survival after modification of the administration schedule and combination with palliative surgery. A prospective randomized study is warranted to confirm this conclusion from our retrospective study.     

Evaluation of intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of intraarterial infusion chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer, its side effect and patient prognosis, in comparison with systemic infusion. Of 125 cases of advanced gastric cancer, 41 cases received intraarterial chemotherapy (A group) and the rest were given systemic infusion (S group). Protocols of chemotherapy were 5-FU + MTX in 49 cases, 5-FU + cisplatin in 62, and 5-FU + MMC in 14. Location of the disease was the peritoneum in 69 cases, nodes in 59, liver in 38, and other sites, 33. The response rate of A group was significantly higher than that of S group, at 31% and 13% respectively. Although 41% of cases showed side effects (> or = grade 2), there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The median survival period and 1-year survival rate were 8.4 months and 35%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. In cases with liver metastasis, the prognosis of A group was better than that of S group. The results suggest that intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy is an effective treatment for liver metastasis from gastric cancer.     

Diet supplemented with yoghurt or milk fermented by Lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 stimulates growth and brush-border enzyme activities in mouse small intestine

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapeutic principles have in recent years received increasing attention in the management of patients with carcinoma of the upper gastrointestinal tract. A series of randomized prospective trials has demonstrated that adjuvant postoperative radiation or chemotherapy does not result in a convincing survival advantage after complete tumor resection in gastric or esophageal cancer. The available data on the role of neoadjuvant preoperative therapy in these patients as yet permit no conclusion. While neoadjuvant therapy may reduce the tumor mass in a substantial portion of patients, a series of randomized controlled trials has shown that, compared to primary resection, a multimodal approach does not result in a survival benefit in patients with loco-regional, i.e. potentially resectable, tumors. In contrast, in patients with locally advanced tumors, i.e. tumors for which complete removal with primary surgery appears unlikely, neoadjuvant therapy increases the chance for complete tumor resection on subsequent surgery. However, only patients with objective histopathologic response to preoperative therapy appear to benefit from this approach. Compared to preoperative chemotherapy alone, combined radio-chemotherapy increases the rate of response, particularly in squamous cell esophageal cancer, but may also increase postoperative morbidity and mortality. Neoadjuvant therapy should therefore currently only be performed in experienced centers within the context of prospective clinical trials. The identification of factors that would allow prediction of response to neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy is the focus of ongoing studies.     

Hepatic arterial chemotherapy for liver cancer over a period of 8 years

Hepatic arterial chemotherapy was performed for 27 patients with primary (3), metastatic liver cancer (21), and 3 other cases, over a period of 8 years. Chemotherapy was performed by intermittent hepatic arterial infusion of 5-FU or FAM (in case of metastatic tumor from colorectal cancer), FAM (from gastric cancer), and CDDP or Farmorubicin (HCC). Hepatic resection was performed in 10 cases of metastatic tumor from colorectal cancer, and 8 cases of 10 were curative operation. The 5-year survival rates of curative liver resection group, and non-curative liver resection or non-resection group were 57.1% and 12.5%, respectively. As is the case with metastatic cancer from gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the prognosis was poor except for one CR case of HCC. We concluded that hepatic arterial chemotherapy may be recommended for a curative resected case of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer.     

Adjuvant therapy after curative resection for gastric cancer: meta-analysis of randomized trials

PURPOSE: An overview is presented of reports published since 1980, in which postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is compared with surgery alone for patients with gastric cancer. A MEDLINE literature review yielded 123 reports, 14 of which were relevant randomized trials; data from 11 of these trials were (or became) available for analysis of crude mortality odds. These 11 trials included 2,096 patients. METHODS: Odds ratios were calculated by comparing the adjuvant treatment arm with the observation-only arm. Those odds ratios that could be considered homogeneous yielded an estimated common odds ratio of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.08), which was slightly, but far from significantly, in support of adjuvant treatment. RESULTS: The results confirm the common opinion that the adjuvant chemotherapy regimens prescribed in these trials, although effective in phase II studies, do not improve survival. Furthermore they indicate that postoperative chemotherapy in general offers no additional survival benefit for patients with curatively resected gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, at present, postoperative chemotherapy cannot be considered as standard adjuvant treatment. New trials of adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer must include a no-treatment control arm.     

Two cases of advanced gastric cancer effectively treated with chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin and cytarabine

We reported two cases of advanced gastric cancer effectively treated with chemotherapy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin (CDDP) and cytarabine (Ara-C), 5-FU (300-350 mg/body) was given by continuous intravenous infusion. Ara-C (20-40 mg/body) by continuous infusion and CDDP (15-20 mg/body) were added intravenously for 3-6 days. For case 1, epirubicin (30 mg/body) was also given on the first day of each therapy course. Case 1 was a 62-year-old female who had gastric cancer with liver metastasis, ovarian metastasis and peritonitis carcinomatosa. After 3 courses of the chemotherapy, reduction of ovarian metastasis greater than 75% was observed. The value of CA125 decreased from 6,800 U/ml to 527 U/ml and ascites disappeared. Case 2 was a 54-year-old male who had type 3 advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases. He received 6 courses of the therapy. Both primary and metastatic tumors showed over 50% reduction in tumor size. These suggested that this combination therapy was effective for inoperable advanced gastric cancers.     

Postoperative chemotherapy including intraperitoneal and intradermal administration of the streptococcal preparation OK-432 for patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal dissemination: a prospective randomized study

We studied the effects on survival time of postoperative immuno-chemotherapy, including the streptococcal preparation OK-432, in patients with gastric cancer and synchronous peritoneal dissemination. The patients were prospectively randomized and a valid statistical assessment could be made for 109. Patients randomized to group B received therapy that is widely used in Japan to treat patients with gastric cancer: mitomycin C (MMC) and UFT, a combination of tegafur and uracil in a molar ratio of 1:4, for 1 year. Patients randomized to group A received the same drugs as were given to group B patients plus OK-432 i.p. for 7 days, beginning on postoperative day 0, and OK-432 by intradermal injection for 1 year, at 2-week intervals. There were no differences between the two groups in any known prognostic factor or in the dose of any drug administered except for OK-432. There was no difference in the toxicity rate between the groups. In this negative trial, there was no improvement in survival time with the addition of OK-432 to MMC and UFT for patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal dissemination.     

Differences between Japan and the west in treatment strategy for gastrointestinal cancer--gastric cancer

Diagnosis, staging, and treatment strategies for gastric cancer were reviewed with regard to differences between Japan and the West. In Japan, detection of early gastric cancer is common due to mass screening and widespread use of endoscopy. Treatment options for gastric cancer vary from endoscopic mucosal resection to the super-extended lymphadenectomy. Correct selection from the available options requires meticulous staging including endoscopy with indigocarmine spray, double contrast barium meal study, endoscopic ultrasonography, CT, abdominal ultrasound, and sometimes barium enema to detect possible peritoneal seeding. Western gastric cancer patients are, on average, 10 years older, more obese, have more cardiopulmonary disease, and more advanced tumors than Japanese patients. Because of the high proportion of patients with extensive disease at presentation in the West, laparoscopic staging is frequently used to avoid non-curative surgery. In Japan, D2 lymphadenectomy is the standard, and now a more extended surgery (D4) is being evaluated in a randomized controlled study, while D2 lymphadenectomy has been reported to be associated with high morbidity and mortality in European studies. Adjuvant chemotherapy is more commonly used in Japan, mostly with oral fluorouracil. However, no regimen has been shown effective in the adjuvant setting in either Japanese and Western studies.     

Primary lung cancer in patients under 40 years of age

There seems to be a resistance of patients and physicians towards aggressive diagnostic evaluation of the symptoms of lung cancer in young people. We here review nine series of young patients with primary lung cancer. Patients below 40 years of age represent between 1.2 and 5% of the total lung cancer population. The distribution of sex and histopathologic findings is different, there being more women, fewer cases of squamous cell and more cases of small anaplastic and adenocarcinoma in the young group. Between 87 and 96% are smokers. There is a delay from the debut of symptoms to the first contact with a general physician of 2.4 to 10.8 months. There is a wide variation concerning tendency to operate with a frequency of curative resection of between 15 and 57%. Based on the survival of young patients who are treated by curative surgical resection, the outcome of surgical treatment for young patients does not differ from the general experience concerning resection in patients of all ages. Young patients who are found inoperable have worse survival than the older patients. Seventy to 90%, more than in the group of patients of all ages, have stadium II or III at the time of diagnosis. In conclusion, physicians should be aggressive with respect to the diagnostic evaluation even of young patients with symptoms suggestive of lung cancer.     

New combination therapy with FTM [5-FU, pirarubicin (THP) and MMC] for treatment of inoperable advanced gastric cancer

Clinical usefulness of a new combination FTM therapy consisting of 5-FU, Pirarubicin (THP) and MMC for the treatment of advanced gastric cancers was investigated. 5-FU, THP or MMC was administered at a dose of 600 mg/m2 on day 1, 8, 22 and 29, 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22, and 10 mg/m2 on day one only of each course, respectively. Eighteen patients with inoperable advanced gastric cancer were treated with FTM. All drugs were investigated by intravenously by one shot. The tumor response rate was 50% [9 of 18 showed PR]. The survival rate was higher in responders than in nonresponders (18.1% vs 11.1%) (p < 0.05). Side effects in the gastrointestinal tract were minimal. Cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity were not detected, but myelosuppression was prominent in most cases. G-CSF was given in sixteen patients (88%), and platelet transfusion was performed in two patients (11%). New combination FTM therapy is an effective treatment regimen even for advanced inoperable gastric cancer.     

Retrospective study on palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer

A retrospective analysis included 119 patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer confirmed in histological examination. This group of patients was treated in Memorial Cancer Institute Cracow Branch between 1950 and 1993. The study revealed that a palliative operation (gastroduodenostomy, cholangioenterostomy or cholangiogastrostomy) was the factor of great influence on the time of survival. The average survival in operated versus not operated patients was 7.5 months and 4.0 months, respectively. Another factor exerting influence on the survival appeared to be the progression of the neoplastic process. The average survival in case of locally advanced versus disseminated disease was 6.9 and 2.3 months, respectively. Although the survival in the group of patients who underwent chemotherapy was longer, the significance of this method of treatment can not be estimated as the group was not numerous enough. The time from the beginning of symptoms and from the first physical examination to establishing diagnosis has prolonged in the last decade.     

Cardiovascular disease prevention in eastern Europe

A phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by methotrexate (MTX) (with leucovorin (LV) rescue) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced (inoperable) or metastatic gastric carcinoma. From July 1993 through August 1996, 36 patients with advanced gastric carcinoma received a regimen that consisted of: MTX 200 mg/m2 diluted in 250 ml normal saline by intravenous infusion over 20 minutes at hour 0; 5-FU 1,200 mg/m2 intravenous push injection at hour 20. Beginning 24 hours after MTX administration all patients received LV 15 mg/m2 intramuscularly every 6 hours for six doses. Cycles were repeated every 15 days. One patient was not assessable for response. Objective regression was observed in 15 of 37 patients (43%; 95% confidence interval, 26%-60%). One patient (3%) achieved complete response and 14 (40%) achieved partial response. No change was recorded in 14 patients (40%) and progressive disease was noted in six patients (17%). The median time to treatment failure was 7 months and the median survival was 12 months. Toxicity was within acceptable limits but one therapy-related death resulting from severe leukopenia occurred. The dose-limiting toxicity was mucositis. Five episodes of grade 3 or 4 stomatitis were observed and caused dosage modifications of MTX and 5-FU. Biochemical modulation of 5-FU by MTX appears as an attractive modality in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Further investigation both in experimental and clinical fields is needed to clearly define its role and to design the best modulatory strategy.     

Chemotherapy for cervical carcinoma: factors determining response and implications for clinical trial design

PURPOSE: To identify characteristics that predict response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1986 and May 1996, 190 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix not amenable to curative radiation therapy or surgery were treated on 14 different chemotherapy protocols at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Patient's charts were retrospectively reviewed for patient demographics, tumor and treatment characteristics, and patterns of response and survival. RESULTS: Of 190 patients, 22 had advanced or persistent disease and 168 had recurrent disease. Patients were treated with platinum-based (n=95) and non-platinum-based (n=95) regimens. The overall response rate was 20.0% (4.2% complete response; 15.8% partial response), with a median response duration of 4.8 months. Race, socioeconomic class, tumor stage and grade, mode of primary treatment, time from primary diagnosis to disease recurrence, initial performance status, and use of platinum-based therapy were not significant predictors of response. Age at time of chemotherapy (P=.001) and site of recurrence (P=.044) were significant determinants by multivariate analysis. Patients who were older were more likely to respond to therapy, and the response rate for patients in whom disease recurred outside the irradiated field was 25.2%, compared with a 5.3% response rate for patients with recurrent disease limited to a previously irradiated field. CONCLUSION: The site of disease recurrence and patient age should be taken into account when designing chemotherapy trials and also when considering chemotherapy in the patient with recurrent cervix cancer.     

The role of neoadjuvant therapy in surgically resectable esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of neoadjuvant therapy (NT) (preoperative chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or both) in surgically resectable esophageal cancer. DESIGN: A retrospective review over a 20-year period. SETTING: A tertiary academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All patients undergoing surgical resection for esophageal cancer (N = 316) over this time period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative morbidity and mortality, local and distant recurrences, and overall survival. RESULTS: Patients undergoing NT (n = 106) had prognostic factors similar to those treated with surgery alone (n = 210). No increase was noted in surgical morbidity with NT (anastomotic leaks, reoperation rates, complications, or extended hospital stays). Overall survival was not improved by NT (median survival, 14 months) except in the subset of patients (11/83) who responded completely (100% histological necrosis) to preoperative chemotherapy (median survival, 79.2 months; P < .02). Complete response to radiation therapy alone was not associated with improved survival. Partial necrosis of the primary tumor was seen in 13 (15%) of 83 patients but conferred no survival advantage. Complete response to preoperative chemotherapy was associated with squamous cell pathological features and excellent performance status as measured by preanesthesia evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of NT did not increase perioperative morbidity or mortality. Only the subset of patients who had a complete response to preoperative chemotherapy showed a survival advantage. Excellent performance status and squamous cell pathological features were associated with an increased chance of complete pathological response following preoperative chemotherapy.