The value of obturator canal bypass. A review

OBJECTIVE: To review the value of obturator canal bypass with respect to long-term results. DESIGN: Case series and literature review. SETTING: University of Vienna Medical School in Austria. PATIENTS/METHODS: Personal experience with 34 consecutive patients and 125 cases published since 1982 with respect to patient data, patency, and survival are compared and jointly analyzed retrospectively. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received obturator canal bypass for lesions of the pelvic or common femoral vessels precluding orthotopic reconstruction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The rates of patient survival, limb salvage, and graft patency were analyzed. RESULTS: The postoperative mortality rate in the present series was 14.7%. The limb salvage rate after 5 years was 76.5%. One- and 5-year secondary patency rates were 75.3% and 54.9%, respectively. All grafts in patients without atherosclerosis were patent at a median of 34 months. For 57 cases documented in the literature, 1- and 5-year patency rates were 70.8% and 59.7%, respectively. Combined analysis of 90 obturator canal bypasses revealed rates of 72.7% and 56.9% of patent grafts at 1- and 5-years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of obturator canal bypass is recommended in deep groin infections and especially in patients with lesions of the pelvic vessels due to other occlusive vascular disease.     

Preferred strategies for secondary infrainguinal bypass: lessons learned from 300 consecutive reoperations

PURPOSE: To determine the optimal surgical strategies in reoperative infrainguinal bypass, we reviewed our results in 300 consecutive secondary bypasses in 251 patients operated on between Jan. 1, 1975, and Nov. 1, 1993. METHODS: There were 168 men (67%) and 83 women (33%), with a mean age of 64.8 years and a typical distribution of risk factors including smoking (76.4%), diabetes (33.7%), and coronary artery disease (47.1%). The indications for surgery were limb-threatening ischemia in 83.5% and severe claudication in 16.5% of patients. The majority of conduits (n = 213) were autogenous vein and were composed of a single segment of greater saphenous vein in 121 bypasses (57%) and various alternative veins including composite, arm, and lesser saphenous vein in 92 bypasses (43%). Prosthetic conduits included 69 polytetrafluoroethylene, 16 umbilical vein, and two Dacron grafts. RESULTS: There was one perioperative death (0.3%) and a 25% total morbidity rate including a 1.7% myocardial infarction rate. There was a 28.6% early (< 30 days) graft failure and 10.7% early amputation rate for prosthetic bypass grafts compared with 13.6% early graft failure and 5.6% early amputation rates for vein grafts. Autogenous vein bypasses had higher 5-year secondary patency rates than had prosthetic grafts (51.5% +/- 4.6% vs 27.4% +/- 6.1%, p < 0.001). Results with autogenous vein bypass improved significantly from the 1975 to 1984 to the 1985 to 1993 interval with 5-year secondary patency rates increasing from 38.3% +/- 6.9% to 59.1% +/- 5.8% (p = 0.017) and 5-year limb-salvage rates increasing from 40.4% +/- 7.6% to 72.4% +/- 6.6% (p < 0.001). Vein grafts to the popliteal and tibial outflow levels had equivalent long-term results. Vein grafts completed for claudication demonstrated results superior to those for limb salvage, with a 5-year secondary patency rate of 75.8% +/- 8.1% versus 52.3% +/- 7.9% (p = 0.048). Secondary autogenous vein bypass grafting performed after early primary graft failure (< 3 months) did particularly poorly, with only a 27.2% +/- 7.7% 4-year secondary patency rate. Greater saphenous veins tended to perform better than alternative vein bypasses, with a 5-year secondary patency rate of 68.5% +/- 6.0% compared with 48.3% +/- 10.5% (p = 0.09) and a 5-year limb-salvage rate of 77.8% +/- 7.4% versus 54.2% +/- 11.8% (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: When patients suffer a recurrence of limb-threatening ischemia at the time of infrainguinal graft failure, aggressive attempts at secondary revascularization with autogenous vein are warranted based on the low surgical morbidity and mortality rates and the improved patency and limb salvage rates that are currently attainable.     

Impact of inflow reconstruction on infrainguinal bypass

PURPOSE: This study assessed whether multisegmental disease that is severe enough to require an inflow procedure adversely affects infrainguinal bypass patency, limb salvage, or patient survival rates. METHODS: The records of 495 patients who underwent 551 infrainguinal bypass grafting procedures were reviewed. Saphenous vein and prosthetic grafts were evaluated separately. Graft patency rates, patient limb salvage rates, and patient survival rates in those grafts that arose from a reconstructed inflow source were compared with those that arose from normal, nonreconstructed inflow sources. When grafts had either hemodynamic failure or occlusion, the cause of failure was identified. RESULTS: Four-year primary patency rates in vein grafts that arose from a reconstructed inflow sources were lower than those in grafts that arose from nonreconstructed inflow sources (41% vs 54%; p = 0.006). Assisted primary patency rates and secondary patency rates, however, were similar (62% vs 74% and 64% vs 77%, respectively). The 4-year primary patency rate (45% vs 55%), assisted primary patency rate (60% vs 60%), and secondary patency rate (60% vs 61%) in prosthetic grafts did not vary based on inflow source. The most common cause of graft failure was inflow failure, except in the vein grafts that did not require an inflow procedure, in which the most common cause of failure was graft failure. Inflow failure occurred in 24% and 22% of the vein and prosthetic grafts with multisegmental disease, respectively, but in only 7% (p < 0.001) and 10% (p < 0.05), respectively, of those that arose from normal nonreconstructed inflow. The presence of an inflow procedure did not affect limb salvage rates or patient survival rates, regardless of graft material. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term patency rates, patient limb salvage rates, and survival rates in patients with a reconstructed inflow source were similar to those of patients with a normal nonreconstructed inflow. A major cause of occlusion is inflow failure, and this occurs in a greater proportion of patients with multisegmental disease. These patients, in particular, may benefit from patient surveillance to screen for progression of their inflow disease and to allow for intervention before infrainguinal graft occlusion.     

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of limb threatening ischemia: do the results justify an attempt before bypass grafting?

PURPOSE: Results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in selected cases have been reported to be equal or superior to those of arterial bypass graft surgery, with a lower morbidity and mortality. We performed PTA of stenotic or occlusive lesions in patients with limb-threatening ischemia, hoping to improve our overall success and decrease morbidity in this group of patients. The results of PTA in the limb-salvage setting was evaluated. METHODS: From 1992 to 1995, 307 PTAs were performed in 257 patients. One hundred sixty-one (63%) patients had diabetes mellitus, and 32 (12%) patients had renal failure. All patients were evaluated by means of pulse volume recordings and ankle brachial indices at 1 and 6 weeks after PTA and at 3 month intervals thereafter. Seventeen patients (9%) were lost to follow-up. The continued success or failure of PTA was defined by means of noninvasive vascular laboratory criteria, patency by means of pulse examination, the need for subsequent bypass grafting across the index lesion, and limb salvage. RESULTS: The 1-year patency rates for external iliac PTAs (56%) were significantly lower (P <.05) than those for common iliac PTAs (87%). Infrainguinal PTAs at the femoral, popliteal, and tibial level had 1-year patency rates of less than 15%. CONCLUSION: Common iliac artery PTA is justified in most cases in which it is feasible. However, when PTAs are performed below the inguinal ligament, the results are markedly worse. One-year patency rates of PTA in this group of patients with threatened limbs are inferior to the patency rates of arterial bypass grafts, even when these bypasses are performed with a prosthetic material. PTA should not be considered as a primary treatment modality for patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease who also have limb-threatening ischemia, except in unusual circumstances.     

Management of failed and infected axillofemoral grafts

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review the treatment of patients with failed or infected axillofemoral bypass grafts and to determine the efficacy of remedial procedures in maintaining graft patency and limb preservation. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with 37 failed or infected axillofemoral grafts were retrospectively reviewed. In nine cases there was no attempt at revascularization, and in the remaining 28 cases, a total of 52 remedial procedures was performed. Nine were performed in patients with graft infection and 43 in patients with graft thrombosis. In patients with axillofemoral graft failure, 21 thrombectomies, 13 graft revisions, and 9 secondary reconstructions were performed. Eighty-eight percent of patients were monitored at least 2 years or until graft failure. RESULTS: Eight of nine patients receiving no remedial procedure required major amputation. The limb salvage rate was 64% +/- 11% at 30 months in the 25 patients undergoing remedial procedures. Twenty-eight percent of failed axillofemoral grafts remained patent at 2 years after initial failure with single or multiple thrombectomies or revisions. Life-table primary patency after secondary reconstructions (81% +/- 10.9% at 24 months) was significantly better than after thrombectomy alone (10% +/- 4.2% at 24 months) or graft revision (16% +/- 10.6% at 24 months) by log-rank test (p < 0.001 and p < 0.005, respectively). Patients undergoing reconstruction with descending thoracic aorta to femoral artery bypass had an 89% +/- 11% patency rate at 24 months. Graft infection resulted in a perioperative mortality rate of 22% and amputation in 57% of survivors. CONCLUSION: Axillofemoral graft failure most often results in limb loss without remedial procedures. Thrombectomy and revision procedures had poor long-term patency rates and salvaged only a minority of grafts despite multiple procedures. Reconstruction by use of an alternate source of inflow such as the descending thoracic aorta resulted in better long-term patency rates in patients well enough to tolerate a major reoperative procedure.     

Surgical treatment of threatened reversed infrainguinal vein grafts

PURPOSE: Current information concerning the results of surgical revision of threatened infrainguinal vein grafts is largely limited to in situ conduits. Infrainguinal grafts may be threatened by intrinsic graft lesions or significant stenosis in the adjacent inflow or outflow arteries. To assess the results of operative revision of infrainguinal reversed vein grafts, we reviewed our experience with surgical revision of threatened infrainguinal reversed vein grafts identified through a program of postoperative clinical and vascular laboratory graft surveillance. METHODS: All patients who underwent surgical revision of a threatened but patent infrainguinal reversed vein graft from January 1987 through April 1993 were identified through review of our vascular registry. Data were analyzed for type of vein used, date of original reversed vein graft, clinical and vascular laboratory findings leading to reversed vein graft revision, results of preoperative angiography, patient risk factors, operative techniques and complications, and long-term assisted primary graft patency and limb salvage. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients with 100 infrainguinal reversed vein grafts (69) femoral-popliteal, 31 femoral-tibial) underwent 117 surgical vein graft revisions or inflow procedures during the study period. Eighty-one percent of the original reversed vein grafts consisted of a single segment of greater saphenous vein. All revised grafts had at least a 50% stenosis in the graft itself or the proximal or distal artery. A single revision was performed in 85 grafts, two revisions in 13 grafts, and three revisions in two grafts. There were nine (8%) isolated inflow procedures, eight (7%) vein patch angioplasties, 62 (53%) interposition vein grafts, and 29 (25%) vein graft extensions to a new distal anastomotic site. The remaining nine (8%) procedures consisted of combinations of the above. Median time to primary graft revision after initial graft implantation was 15 months (range 2 days to 316 months). Mean time to secondary revision after primary revision was 21 months. Operative mortality was 0.9%. Cumulative assisted primary patency of the original grafts revised for stenotic lesions was 99%, 96%, and 92% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Limb salvage was 99%, 97%, and 97% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although surgical revision of reversed vein graft requires much use of alternative vein sources, these procedures can be performed with minimum mortality and provide excellent assisted primary graft patency and limb salvage.     

Carotid artery repair for radiation-associated atherosclerosis is a safe and durable procedure

OBJECTIVE: The development of carotid atherosclerosis after neck irradiation is well documented. There has been concern about the safety and durability of carotid artery repair through a radiated field. The objective of this report is to describe the immediate and long-term results of a series of cases collected in a 13-year interval. METHODS: From 1984 to 1997, 24 patients underwent 26 carotid artery operations. All the patients had undergone prior radiation therapy at a mean interval of 17 years, with an average radiation dose of 6300 rad. Severe scarring of the skin or radiation fibrosis were present in two thirds of the patients, with 4 patients having permanent tracheostomies. The indications for carotid surgery included cerebral or monocular transient ischemic attack (58%), asymptomatic high-grade stenosis (27%), prior stroke (12%), and tumor invasion of the carotid artery (4%). General anesthesia was used with selective shunting on the basis of carotid artery back pressure or electroencephalography monitoring. Patch angioplasty closure was used in 79% of the patients. The operations included standard carotid endarterectomy (n = 20), external carotid endarterectomy (n = 2), carotid patch angioplasty alone (n = 2), aortocarotid bypass grafting (n = 1), and carotid interposition grafting (n = 1). Four patients required skin grafting or myocutaneous flaps. RESULTS: No deaths or strokes occurred within 30 days of the operations. Six patients had transient cranial nerve palsy, and two had wound infections. The patients were followed from 1 to 156 months, with six patients being followed for longer than 18 months. No strokes were seen at late follow-up examination. Duplex scan examination documented one occlusion, in a patient with primary closure, and two restenoses, one of which necessitated reoperation. The remainder of the grafts were widely patent. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid surgery after neck irradiation is safe and durable. The long-term patency rates and the protection against subsequent neurologic events are similar to the results obtained in the absence of radiation therapy. Problems of wound healing were not found in this series.     

Prospective comparison of infrainguinal bypass grafting in patients with and without antiphospholipid antibodies

PURPOSE: The antiphospholipid antibodies (APL)-anticardiolipin antibodies (ACL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA)-are widely believed to be associated with decreased lower extremity bypass graft patency rates. To date, no prospective cohort study has confirmed this assumption. A prospective comparison of the result of infrainguinal revascularization procedures performed since 1990 in patients with and without APL forms the basis of this report. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective infrainguinal bypass procedures from 1990 to 1994 were evaluated for hypercoagulable states (ACL, LA, protein C, protein S, and antithrombin III). Patient data were prospectively entered in a computerized vascular registry, and postoperative follow-up was maintained for life. Graft patency, limb salvage, and patient survival rates were calculated by life-table methods. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-seven lower extremity bypass grafting procedures were performed in 262 patients. APLs were present in 83 patients (32%); 70 patients (84%) had ACLs only, 11 patients (13%) had LA only, and two patients (3%) had both ACLs and LA. There was no significant difference between APL-positive and APL-negative patients with respect to demographics, associated medical conditions, indication for operations, and type of procedures performed. More patients who had APLs had warfarin treatment after surgery (43% vs 24%, p = 0.002). Life table 4-year primary patency rates showed minimal difference (APL-positive, 43%; APL-negative, 59%; p = 0.087), and no significant difference was noted in assisted primary patency rates (APL positive, 72%; APL negative, 73%; p = NS), limb salvage rates (APL positive, 79%; APL negative, 88%; p = NS), and patient survival rates (APL positive, 67%; APL negative, 66%; p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: APLs were found in a surprising one third of the patients who underwent leg bypass grafting procedures. The majority of APLs identified were ACLs (87%). There was minimal difference in graft primary patency rates, and no difference in assisted primary patency, limb salvage, and survival rates between patients with and without APLs who underwent leg bypass grafting procedures. The extreme morbidity rate associated with APLs in previous reports is not confirmed by this prospective study. APLs should not be regarded as a contraindication to indicated leg bypass grafting procedures.     

Very distal bypass for salvage of the severely ischemic extremity

Forty-six bypass grafts to tibial arteries distal to the ankle were performed in 35 patients for salvage of extremities threatened by gangrene or nonhealing ulcers (grade III, category 5) or ischemic rest pain (grade II, category 4). Most patients (80%) were diabetic, with severely calcified arteries, whom previously we would have considered as candidates for primary amputation. All reconstructions were performed with autologous saphenous vein. Inflow was from the common femoral artery in 5 (11%), the popliteal artery in 25 (54%), or the mid-tibial arteries in 16 (35%). Life-table analysis was used to calculate primary patency and limb salvage. Results were analyzed according to origin of inflow, outflow, or configuration of the conduit (in situ saphenous vein, n = 29 [63%], reversed saphenous vein, n = 11 [24%], or nonreversed saphenous vein, n = 6 [13%]). Overall cumulative primary graft patency at 2 years for all grafts was 72%, and the cumulative limb salvage rate was 89% for the same interval. No significant differences were seen in comparing grafts originating from the femoral or popliteal level with those arising from the tibial arteries. No significant differences were noted in graft patency or limb salvage among grafts with a posterior tibial, dorsalis pedis, or plantar artery outflow. No significant difference was noted between in situ saphenous vein grafts and reversed saphenous vein grafts. A significant decreased primary patency was noted for grafts performed with nonreversed, translocated saphenous vein. We conclude that bypass grafts to the ankle or foot vessels are beneficial and should be considered for limb salvage in extremities with gangrene, ischemic ulceration, or ischemic rest pain. In our experience, in situ saphenous vein grafts or reversed saphenous vein grafts performed similarly, whereas nonreversed saphenous vein grafts have a poorer prognosis. Vessel wall calcification requires a modification in technique for performance of these grafts but did not affect long-term performance or limb salvage, and thus should not be considered a contraindication to vascular reconstruction. The operative microscope was used in 61% (28 of 46) of these cases and found useful in creating these delicate anastomoses. Additional follow-up is needed to document the long-term results of these very distal reconstructions.     

Age specific prostate specific antigen reference ranges: population specific

BACKGROUND: Anastomosis of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery without sternotomy and without cardiopulmonary bypass is a standard approach in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. To expand the indications for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting from one-vessel disease to two-vessel disease, we began to perform anastomosis of the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) to the right coronary artery (RCA). METHODS: From February to November 1996, an RGEA graft was used in 25 of the 100 patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting at our clinic. Eleven of the patients had only RCA disease and 14 had both RCA and left anterior descending artery disease. One of the operations was a redo coronary artery bypass grafting. The RGEA was anastomosed to the RCA through a laparotomy incision and the left internal thoracic artery was anastomosed to the left anterior descending artery through a left anterior thoracotomy. In 5 patients, the RGEA was lengthened by venous grafting. RESULTS: All patients underwent angiography after operation; 82.6% of the RGEA grafts and all the left internal thoracic artery grafts were functioning well. In three of the four nonvisualized RGEA grafts, the percentage of proximal stenosis of the RCA seen on postoperative angiography was not critical (40%, 50%, and 50%, respectively), allowing significant competitive flow through the native bypassed RCA. The patency of all the RGEA grafts without competitive flow was 95%, with a 95% confidence interval of 75.1% to 99.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The indications for minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting could be extended to primary operations in patients with left anterior descending artery and RCA lesions by using both the left internal thoracic artery and the RGEA.     

Angiographic 20-year follow-up of 61 consecutive patients with internal thoracic artery grafts

OBJECTIVE: To assess the behavior of internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts versus venous grafts in repeated angiograms up to 20 years. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Use of ITA grafts to bypass left anterior descending artery stenosis has been shown to be associated with improved survival in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: Sixty-one consecutive patients who received one or two ITA grafts and who underwent surgery from Oct. 5, 1971, to Dec. 18, 1973, in Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland, were included in this prospective follow-up series. Fifty-six of the patients (92%) also received at least one venous graft. The number of distal anastomoses was 157, of which 47.7% (75) were performed with ITA grafts. The median age of the patients was 47.7 years (range 30.0 to 63.1), and 85% (52) were men. RESULTS: After 20 years of follow-up, 18/20 (90%) of the survivors underwent angiography; the patency rate was 88.9% for ITA grafts and 47.8% for venous grafts. Cumulative graft patency at 20 years, using all the information obtained from repeated angiographic examinations and autopsies, was also calculated to eliminate selection bias. The cumulative 20-year patency rate was 81% for ITA-left anterior descending artery anastomoses, 53.8% for venous graft-right coronary artery anastomoses, and 48.5% for venous graft-left circumflex artery anastomoses. In paired comparisons between anastomoses, the patency time of the ITA-left anterior descending artery anastomoses was on average 2.8 years longer than the venous graft-left circumflex artery patency time and 2.6 years longer than the venous graft-right coronary artery. CONCLUSIONS: Internal thoracic artery grafts, especially in left anterior descending artery anastomoses, should be considered as a primary solution in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with >10 years of life expectancy; if venous grafting is preferred, further evidence is needed.     

Infrainguinal arterial reconstruction for claudication: is it worth the risk? An analysis of 409 procedures

PURPOSE: Infrainguinal reconstruction traditionally has been reserved for patients with limb-threatening ischemia. Surgery for debilitating claudication, however, has been discouraged as a result of the perceived fear of bypass graft failure, limb loss, and significant perioperative complications that may be worse than the natural history of the disease. In this study, the results of infrainguinal reconstructions for claudication performed during the past 10 years were evaluated for bypass graft patency, limb loss, and long-term survival rates. METHODS: Data were collected and reviewed from the vascular registry, the office charts, and the hospital records for patients who underwent infrainguinal bypass grafting for claudication. RESULTS: From 1987 to 1997, 409 infrainguinal reconstructions were performed for claudication (9% of all infrainguinal reconstructions in our unit). The patient population had the following demographics: 73% men, 28% with diabetes, 54% smokers, and an average age of 64 years (range, 24 to 91 years). Inflow was from the following arteries: iliac artery/graft, 10%; common femoral artery, 52%; superficial femoral artery, 19%; profunda femoris artery, 16%; and popliteal artery, 2%. The outflow vessels were the following arteries: 165 above-knee popliteal arteries (40%), 150 below-knee popliteal arteries (37%), and 94 tibial vessels (23%). The operative mortality rate was 0%, and one limb was lost in the series from distal embolization. The primary patency rates were 62%, 77%, and 86% for above-knee popliteal artery, below-knee popliteal artery, and tibial vessel reconstructions at 4 years, and the secondary patency rates were 64%, 81%, and 90%, respectively. Cumulative patient survival rates were 93% and 80% at 4 and 6 years as compared with 65% and 52%, respectively, for infrainguinal reconstructions performed for limb salvage. CONCLUSION: Infrainguinal arterial reconstruction for disabling claudication is a safe and durable procedure in selected patients. These data indicate that concern for limb loss, death, and limited life span of the patients with this disease may not be warranted.     

Bacteria-specific lymphocyte proliferation in peripheral blood in reactive arthritis and related diseases

The inferior epigastric artery has been proposed as a suitable conduit for myocardial revascularization but its mid-term patency rate has not been assessed. A prospective clinical and angiographic study on the use of the inferior epigastric artery as an additional arterial conduit together with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting was conducted in 38 patients. No deaths or major postoperative complications occurred. Twenty-three patients underwent repeat angiography after an average of 21.2 months. The left and right internal thoracic artery grafts patency rate was 95.6% (44/46), while inferior epigastric artery patency rate was 52.2% (12/23). By relating patency to the grafted coronary branch, the following results were obtained: 100% for the left anterior descending (3/3), right coronary (1/1) and ramus medianus (1/1); 40% (4/10) and 37.5% (3/8) for diagonals and obtuse marginals respectively. The low patency rates observed when the inferior epigastric artery is used on diagonals and obtuse marginals indicate that this vessel cannot be considered a suitable conduit for extensive application of arterial revascularization. We suggest that the inferior epigastric artery should only be used in patients presenting with contraindications to bilateral internal thoracic artery or right gastroepiploic artery grafting, or exhibiting unsuitable saphenous veins.     

Femorotibial and femoroperoneal bypass vein grafts. A 15-year experience

Results with 111 femoral-infrapopliteal vein grafts in 105 patients were subjected to life-table analysis. The overall five-year cumulative graft patency rate of 46% was associated with a 60% limb salvage rate. In cases in which the infrapopliteal graft represented the initial operative procedure, the five-year limb salvage and patency rates (69% and 56%, respectively) were significantly higher (P less than .05) than those achieved with secondary grafts (38% and 22%, respectively). Most limbs (79%) with failed intrapopliteal grafts, without further attempts at reconstruction, required major amputation within six months. The site of the distal anastomosis (anterior tibial, posterior tibial, or peroneal arteries) proved not to be a significant factor in determining long-term limb salvage or graft patency rates. Furthermore, the differences between five-year salvage and patency rates in diabetics (45% and 32%, respectively) and nondiabetics (65% and 53%, respectively) approached but did not reach statistical significance. It is believed these observations support the established but controversial role of infrapopliteal bypass in advanced peripheral occlusive diseases.     

Iliofemoral venous stenoses: effectiveness of treatment with metallic endovascular stents

PURPOSE: To assess effectiveness of metallic endovascular stents in treatment of venous stenoses and occlusions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stents were placed intravenously in 56 patients (59 stenoses or occlusions) over a 6-year period. Stent sites included the inferior vena cava (n = 10) and common iliac (n = 31), external iliac (n = 46), common femoral (n = 27), and superficial femoral veins (n = 4). Indications for stent placement included stenoses from pelvic malignancy and its treatment; trauma, surgery, or pregnancy; and idiopathic stenoses. Patients underwent anticoagulation therapy for 3-6 months after stent placement. Follow-up was performed with duplex ultrasound. RESULTS: With use of life-table analysis, overall primary and secondary 1-year patency rates were 50% and 81%, respectively. Primary and secondary 4-year patency rates were and 50% and 75%, respectively. Five patients died of primary disease progression within 6 months after stent placement. Major complications occurred in 6.8% of cases. One-year secondary patency rates were statistically significantly lower (P = .05) for patients with malignant disease, although primary patency rates were comparable. Overall sustained decrease in symptoms (P < .0001) was observed 1 year later. CONCLUSION: Endovascular stent placement is a nonsurgical alternative for reestablishment of venous flow and sustained relief of symptoms in patients with malignant or benign pelvic venous disease.     

Anesthesia type does not influence early graft patency or limb salvage rates of lower extremity arterial bypass

PURPOSE: The effect of anesthesia type on 30-day graft patency and limb salvage rates was evaluated in patients who underwent femoral to distal artery bypass. METHODS: Of 423 patients randomly assigned to receive general, spinal, or epidural anesthetic, 76 did not meet protocol standards and 32 had inadequate anesthesia. A chart review of the remaining 315 patients was undertaken to obtain surgical information not recorded in the original study. All patients were monitored with radial and pulmonary artery catheters. After surgery, patients were in a monitored setting for 48 to 72 hours and had graft function assessments hourly during the first 24 hours and then every 8 hours until discharge. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were lost to follow-up (15 general, 22 spinal, 14 epidural). Baseline clinical characteristics were similar for the three groups except prior carotid artery surgery, which was more common in the spinal group. Indications for surgery were also similar except for a higher incidence of nonhealing ulcer in the epidural group. There were no differences among groups for 30-day graft patency with or without reoperation, 30-day graft occlusion, death, amputation, or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the type of anesthetic given for femoral to distal artery bypass does not significantly affect 30-day occlusion rate, limb salvage rate, or hospital length of stay.     

Infrapopliteal bypasses to severely calcified, unclampable outflow arteries: two-year results

PURPOSE: Although severe, circumferential calcification of distal outflow vessels is frequently encountered, its effect on bypass graft patency rates has not been well established. METHODS: Using a computerized vascular registry database, we conducted a retrospective review of 1957 bypass grafts with distal anastomoses to infrapopliteal vessels performed at a single institution between 1990 and 1995. Of these cases, 101 procedures involved outflow arteries classified by the operating surgeon as severely calcified and unclampable (requiring intraluminal occluders for vascular control), whereas in 105 cases the outflow arteries had no calcification present at the distal anastomotic site. The remaining cases had varying intermediate degrees of calcification and were not analyzed. Indication for bypass procedure was limb-threatening ischemia in 90% of severe calcification cases and in 84% of cases without calcification. Atherosclerotic risk factors were similar except for the presence of diabetes (92% vs 74%, p < 0.001), creatinine level > 2.0 mg/dl (21% vs 8%, p < 0.01), and dialysis dependency (17% vs 3%, p < 0.001), all of which were more prevalent in the severe calcification group. Infrapopliteal distal anastomotic location and type of conduit ( > 90% autogenous vein) were comparable between groups. RESULTS: Primary patency, secondary patency, and foot salvage rates at 24 months were 60%, 65%, and 77% for the severe calcification group and 74%, 82%, and 93% for the no calcification group, respectively. With secondary procedures comprising 26% of cases in each group, data from the 150 primary procedures were reanalyzed separately. In this primary procedure group, 24-month primary patency, secondary patency, and foot salvage rates were 66%, 69%, and 77% for the severe calcification group and 84%, 90%, and 96% for the no calcification group, respectively. Although patency and salvage rates were consistently lower for the severe calcification group in all analyses, these differences did not achieve significance by log-rank life-table analysis at 2-year follow-up. Perioperative 30-day mortality (0.99% severe calcification vs 0.95% no calcification) and 24-month survival rates (84% severe calcification vs 83% no calcification) were also similar between groups. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that effective techniques exist to perform infrapopliteal bypasses to severely calcified, unclampable outflow arteries with results comparable with those obtained with clampable, uncalcified vessels. The finding of severe, circumferential calcification of outflow target arteries should not dissuade vascular surgeons from distal bypass for limb salvage indications.     

Gastroepiploic artery graft in 400 patients

The right gastroepoploic artery (GEA) has been used for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 400 patients of a total of 1359 undergoing the same procedure during an 8-year period. There were 327 males and 73 females with a mean age of 59 years. Single-, double- and triple-vessel and left main disease were noted in 4, 51, 283 and 62 patients, respectively. Previous myocardial infarction was noted in 208 patients and 40 patients had undergone previous CABG. Internal thoracic artery (ITA) and inferior epigastric artery grafts were concomitantly used in 388 (97%) and 30 (8%) patients, respectively. The mean number of grafts was 3.2 including vein grafts, and 2.3 coronary arteries were bypassed with arterial grafts. The sites of GEA grafting were 43 anterior descending, 6 diagonal, 71 circumflex, and 287 right coronary arteries with 376 in situ and 24 free grafts including 7 sequential grafts. There were eight (2%) early and five (1.3%) late deaths. New Q waves were noted in six (1.5%) patients. Warm body circulation is thought to be favorable with a lower incidence of the need for intra-aortic balloon pump (0.6% vs 6.0%). Postoperative angiography revealed 94% (253/268) early (2 months) and 94% (47/50) late (2-5 years) patency of GEA grafts. In conclusion. GEA is a safe and effective arterial conduit for CABG.     

Angiographic predictors of graft patency and disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting with arterial and venous grafts

BACKGROUND: There are few data about angiographic determinants of functional graft patency and native artery disease progression after coronary artery bypass grafting operation with arterial grafts compared with venous grafts. METHODS: Baseline and follow-up coronary angiograms at a mean of 2 years after operation in 91 patients with 194 arterial and 204 venous graft anastomoses were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of the arterial and 87% of the venous graft anastomoses were patent at follow-up angiography (p = 0.05, odds ratio = 2.63). Unlike that of arterial grafts, the patency rate of venous graft anastomoses correlated negatively with decreasing severity of the bypassed lesion. In contrast to venous grafts, in which angiographic graft function was basically dichotomous (fully patent or occluded), compromised flow of the arterial graft anastomoses was registered in 12%. Progression of the disease was more common in segments bypassed with venous grafts than with arterial grafts (p = 0.001, odds ratio = 2.03). CONCLUSIONS: Angiographic determinants of functional graft patency and progression of occlusive changes in the bypassed artery segments are different for arterial and venous grafts.     

Results of bypass to the popliteal and tibial arteries with alternative sources of autogenous vein

PURPOSE: The goal of an all-autogenous policy for infrainguinal arterial bypass requires that many bypasses be performed with alternative autogenous veins (AAV) because an adequate length of ipsilateral or contralateral greater saphenous vein (GSV) is not available. The durability and efficacy of infrainguinal vein bypasses constructed of venous conduits other than a single segment of greater saphenous vein (SSGSV) is, however, questioned. METHODS: AAV and GSV bypasses were reviewed from 1980 through 1994. Patients who required bypass to the popliteal or a tibial artery were compared for vascular surgical history and vascular disease risk factors and life-table survival. AAV and SSGSV procedures were compared for indications for surgery, morbidity and mortality rates, limb salvage rates in patients who underwent surgery for limb-salvage indications, subsequent need for revision, and life-table-assisted primary patency. RESULTS: Nine hundred nineteen autogenous vein bypasses were performed to the popliteal or a tibial artery--187 (20%) with AAVs, including whole or partial arm vein conduits in 144 grafts (77%). One hundred fourteen AAVs (61%) required vein splicing. The mortality rate was 2% for SSGSV bypasses and 1% for AAV bypasses. The morbidity rate was higher for GSV surgery as a result of increased wound complications (11% vs 5%; p=0.02). Sixty-seven percent of patients with AAV bypass extremities had undergone previous ipsilateral arterial surgery, compared with 20% of patients with SSGSV bypasses (p0.0005). AAV bypasses were more likely to be to a tibial artery (71% vs 45%; p<0.0001). Twelve percent of SSGSV and 15% of AAV popliteal bypasses required revision (p=NS). The 5-year assisted primary patencies were 82%, 77%, and 63%, with limb salvage rates of 91%, 86%, and 74% for ipsilateral SSGSV, contralateral SSGSV, and AAV femoropopliteal bypasses, respectively. Twelve percent of SSGSV and 30% of AAV tibial bypasses required revision (p=0.0001). The 5-year assisted primary patencies were 74%, 82%, and 72%, with limb salvage rates of 84%, 92% and 78% for ipsilateral SSGSV, contralateral SSGSV, and AAV femorotibial bypasses, respectively. CONCLUSION: AAV bypasses can provide overall results comparable with SSGSV bypasses.