Self‐assembled structures in blends of disordered and lamellar block copolymers: SAXS,SANS and TEM study

BACKGROUND: The phase behaviour of copolymers and their blends is of great interest due to the phase transitions, self‐assembly and formation of ordered structures. Phenomena associated with the microdomain morphology of parent copolymers and phase behaviour in blends of deuterated block copolymers of polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), i.e. (dPS‐block‐dPMMA)₁/(dPS‐block‐PMMA)₂, were investigated using small‐angle X‐ray scattering, small‐angle neutron scattering and transmission electron microscopy as a function of molecular weight, concentration of added copolymers and temperature. RESULTS: Binary blends of the diblock copolymers having different molecular weights and different original micromorphology (one copolymer was in a disordered state and the others were of lamellar phase) were prepared by a solution‐cast process. The blends were found to be completely miscible on the molecular level at all compositions, if their molecular weight ratio was smaller than about 5. The domain spacing D of the blends can be scaled with M_n by D ～ M_n^2/3 as predicted by a previously published postulate (originally suggested and proved for blends of lamellar polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene copolymers). CONCLUSIONS: The criterion for forming a single‐domain morphology (molecularly mixed blend) taking into account the different solubilization of copolymer blocks has been applied to explain the changes in microdomain morphology during the self‐assembling process in two copolymer blends. Evidently the criterion, suggested originally for blends of lamellar polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene copolymers, can be employed to a much broader range of block copolymer blends. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effects of tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile on the interfacial properties of polycarbonate and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) blends

Tetramethylpolycarbonate‐block‐poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (TMPC‐block‐SAN) block copolymers containing various amounts of acrylonitrile (AN) were examined as compatibilizers for blends of polycarbonate (PC) with poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) copolymers. To explore the effects of block copolymers on the compatibility of PC/SAN blends, the average diameter of the dispersed particles in the blend was measured with an image analyzer, and the interfacial properties of the blends were analyzed with an imbedded fibre retraction technique and an asymmetric double‐cantilever beam fracture test. Reduction in the average diameter of dispersed particles and effective improvement in the interfacial properties was observed by adding TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymers as compatibilizer of PC/SAN blend. TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was effective as a compatibilizer when the difference in the AN content of SAN copolymer and that of SAN block in TMPC‐block‐SAN copolymer was less than about 10 wt%. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

AB‐ and ABC‐type di‐ and triblock copolymers of poly[styrene‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)] and poly[styrene‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)‐block‐lactide]: synthesis,characterization and thermal studies

Polystyrene terminated with benzyl alcohol units was employed as a macroinitiator for ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone and L ‐lactide to yield AB‐ and ABC‐type block copolymers. Even though there are many reports on the diblock copolymers of poly(styrene‐block‐lactide) and poly(styrene‐block‐lactone), this is the first report on the poly(styrene‐block‐lactone‐block‐lactide) triblock copolymer consisting of two semicrystalline and degradable segments. The triblock copolymers exhibited twin melting behavior in differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis with thermal transitions corresponding to each of the lactone and lactide blocks. The block derived from ε‐caprolactone also showed crystallization transitions upon cooling from the melt. In the DSC analysis, one of the triblock copolymers showed an exothermic transition well above the melting temperature upon cooling. Thermogravimetric analysis of these block copolymers showed a two‐step degradation curve for the diblock copolymer and a three‐step degradation for the triblock copolymer with each of the degradation steps associated with each segment of the block copolymers. The present study shows that it is possible to make pure triblock copolymers with two semicrystalline segments which also consist of degradable blocks. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis and surface properties of polydimethylsiloxane‐based block copolymers: poly[dimethylsiloxane‐block‐ (ethyl methacrylate)] and poly[dimethylsiloxane‐block‐(hydroxyethyl methacrylate)]

A polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) macroazoinitiator was synthesized from bis(hydroxyalkyl)‐terminated PDMS and 4,4′‐azobis‐4‐cyanopentanoic acid by a condensation reaction. The bifunctional macroinitiator was used for the block copolymerization of ethyl methacrylate (EMA) and 2‐(trimethylsilyloxy)ethyl methacrylate (TMSHEMA) monomers. The poly(DMS‐block‐EMA) and poly(DMS‐block‐TMSHEMA) copolymers thus obtained were characterized using Fourier transform infrared and ¹H NMR spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. After the deprotection of trimethylsilyl groups, poly(DMS‐block‐HEMA) and poly(DMS‐block‐EMA) copolymer film surfaces were analysed using scanning electron microscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The effects of the PDMS concentration in the copolymers on both air and glass sides of films were examined. The PDMS segments oriented and moved to the glass side in poly(DMS‐block‐EMA) copolymer film while orientation to the air side became evident with increasing DMS content in poly(DMS‐block‐HEMA) copolymer film. The block copolymerization technique described here is a versatile and economic method and is also applicable to a wide range of monomers. The copolymers obtained have phase‐separated morphologies and the effects of DMS segments on copolymer film surfaces are different at the glass and air sides. Copyright © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis of block copolymers with thermodynamically compatible chain segments: di‐ and triblock copolymers of polystyrene and poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide)

Mono‐ and bifunctional poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO) macroinitiators for atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) were prepared by esterification of mono‐ and bishydroxy telechelic PPO with 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. The macroinitiators were used for ATRP of styrene to give block copolymers with PPO and polystyrene (PS) segments, namely PPO‐block‐PS and PS‐block‐PPO‐block‐PS. Various ligands were studied in combination with CuBr as ATRP catalysts. Kinetic investigations revealed controlled polymerization processes for certain ligands and temperature ranges. Thermal analysis of the block copolymers by means of DSC revealed only one glass transition temperature as a result of the compatibility of the PS and PPO chain segments and the formation of a single phase; this glass transition temperature can be adjusted over a wide temperature range (ca 100–199 °C), depending on the composition of the block copolymer. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

Synthesis of polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐polystyrene‐block‐polydimethylsiloxane via polysiloxane‐based macroinitiator in supercritical CO2

Polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐polystyrene‐block‐polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS‐b‐PS‐b‐PDMS) was synthesized by the radical polymerization of styrene using a polydimethylsiloxane‐based macroazoinitiator (PDMS MAI) in supercritical CO₂. PDMS MAI was synthesized by reacting hydroxy‐terminated PDMS and 4,4′‐azobis(4‐cyanopentanoyl chloride) (ACPC) having a thermodegradable azo‐linkage at room temperature. The polymerization of styrene initiated by PDMS MAI was investigated in a batch system using supercritical CO₂ as the reaction medium. PDMS MAI was found to behave as a polyazoinitiator for radical block copolymerization of styrene, but not as a surfactant. The response surface methodology was used to design the experiments. The parameters used were pressure, temperature, PDMS MAI concentration and reaction time. These parameters were investigated at three levels (?1, 0 and 1). The dependent variable was taken as the polymerization yield of styrene. PDMS MAI and PDMS‐b‐PS‐b‐PDMS copolymers obtained were characterized by proton nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopy. The number‐ and weight‐average molecular weights of block copolymers were determined by gel permeation chromatography. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene blends

An approach to achieve confined crystallization of ferroelectric semicrystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was investigated. A novel polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS) triblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom‐transfer radical polymerization method and blended with PVDF. Miscibility, crystallization and morphology of the PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends were studied within the whole range of concentration. In this A‐b‐B‐b‐C/D type of triblock copolymer/homopolymer system, crystallizable PVDF (D) and PMMA (B) middle block are miscible because of specific intermolecular interactions while A block (PDMS) and C block (PS) are immiscible with PVDF. Nanostructured morphology is formed via self‐assembly, displaying a variety of phase structures and semicrystalline morphologies. Crystallization at 145 °C reveals that both α and β crystalline phases of PVDF are present in PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends. Incorporation of the triblock copolymer decreases the degree of crystallization and enhances the proportion of β to α phase of semicrystalline PVDF. Introduction of PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS triblock copolymer to PVDF makes the crystalline structures compact and confines the crystal size. Moreover, small‐angle X‐ray scattering results indicate that the immiscible PDMS as a soft block and PS as a hard block are localized in PVDF crystalline structures. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

Selective distribution of interacting magnetic nanoparticles into block copolymer domains based on the facile inversion of micelles

We demonstrate a simple methodology to incorporate interacting magnetic nanoparticles (mNPs) into cylinder forming block copolymer templates. Poly(styrene-block-isoprene) (PS-b-PI) with PI cylinders and poly(styrene-block-4vinylpyridine) (PS-b-P4VP) with PS cylinders were used as the block copolymer templates and γ-Fe₂O₃ NPs coated with oleic acids were pre-synthesized for the interacting mNPs. Regardless of the template block copolymers, the selective location of mNPs and the size of mNP aggregates are clearly altered by changing casting solvents. When good solvents for both blocks were used as casting solvents, mNPs are readily aggregated during the solvent evaporation. In contrast, under selective casting solvents for the minor blocks, the mNPs were selectively trapped into the cylinder domains through the facile inversion of micelles during solvent evaporation. The interplay between mNPs and block copolymers was also tested with different molecular weights of block copolymers.     

Ab initio emulsion RAFT polymerization of vinylidene chloride mediated by amphiphilic macro‐RAFT agents

An amphiphilic copolymer poly(acrylic acid)‐block‐poly(styrene) (PAA‐b‐PS) with a trithiocarbonate reactive group was used in the ab initio reversible addition‐fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) emulsion polymerization of vinylidene chloride (VDC). The fast polymerization and high conversion were achieved. The parameters for a good control over the formation of well‐defined PAA‐b‐PS‐b‐PVDC amphiphilic block copolymers and self‐stabilized latexes were identified. To improve the emulsion stability and prevent the desorption of water‐soluble initiating radicals, the acid groups of PAA‐b‐PS were neutralized by NaOH at the later stage of polymerization. The PAA‐b‐PS‐b‐PVDC block copolymer with a high molar mass of 30 kg mol⁻¹ and the stable latex with 30 wt % solid content was obtained. The kinetics of RAFT emulsion copolymerization of VDC in a living manner was first investigated. The as‐prepared PAA‐b‐PS‐b‐PVDC latex particles were further used as seeds in the emulsion polymerization of styrene, enabling the preparation of novel PAA‐b‐PS‐b‐PVDC‐b‐PS tetra‐block copolymers with a molar mass of 76 kg mol⁻¹ and a relatively low molecular weight distribution of 1.6. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40391.     

Synthesis of poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐polystyrene and poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐[polystyrene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)] through atom transfer radical polymerization

A new graft copolymers poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐polystyrene (PSF‐g‐PS) and poly(aryl ether sulfone)‐graft‐[polystyrene‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)] (PSF‐g‐(PS‐b‐PMMA)) were successfully prepared via atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) catalyzed by FeCl₂/isophthalic acid in N,N‐dimethyl formamide. The products were characterized by GPC, DSC, IR, TGA and NMR. The characterization data indicated that the graft copolymerization was accomplished via conventional ATRP mechanism. The effect of chloride content of the macroinitiator on the graft copolymerization was investigated. Only one glass transition temperature (T_g) was detected by DSC for the graft copolymer PSF‐g‐PS and two glass transition temperatures were observed in the DSC curve of PSF‐g‐(PS‐b‐PMMA). The presence of PSF in PSF‐b‐PS or PSF‐g‐(PS‐b‐PMMA) was found to improve thermal stabilities. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Preparation and morphology of amphiphilic polystyrene–poly (2‐vinylpyridine) heteroarm star copolymers prepared by ATRP

BACKGROUND: The self‐assembly of amphiphilic copolymers has been demonstrated to be a powerful route towards supramolecular objects with novel architectures, functions and physical properties. In this study, the synthesis and morphology of amphiphilic linear polystyrene (PS)‐block‐poly(2‐vinylpyridine) (P2VP) and heteroarm star PS‐star‐P2VP copolymers are studied. The dispersion of silver nanoparticles with the prepared PS‐block‐P2VP and PS‐star‐P2VP copolymers is also discussed. RESULTS: Amphiphilic copolymers with different P2VP chain lengths were successfully synthesized using atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). The copolymers prepared had low polydispersity indices. Various aggregate morphologies, including spheres, vesicles, rods, large compound micelles, two‐dimensional ring‐like and three‐dimensional hollow structures, were formed by varying the hydrophilic coil length and the selective solvent content. Silver nanoparticles showed good dispersion behavior in both types of copolymers. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, it will be possible to prepare metal/copolymer nanocomposites by direct mixing. Further, the PS‐block‐P2VP and PS‐star‐P2VP copolymers prepared can be used in the preparation of nanoporous films as templates and nanoparticles as nanoreactors. They can also be applied in terms of oil recovery, paints and cosmetics formulations, as well as in pharmaceutical and medical applications as rheological agents. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Surface microphase separation in PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films

Well‐defined poly(dimethylsiloxane)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(2,2,3,3,4,4,4‐heptafluorobutyl methacrylate) (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA) triblock copolymers were synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP). Surface microphase separation in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films was investigated. The microstructure of the block copolymers was investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Surface composition was studied by X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The chemical composition at the surface was determined by the surface microphase separation in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films. The increase of the PHFBMA content could strengthen the microphase separation behavior in the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymer films and reduce their surface tension. Comparison between the PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PHFBMA triblock copolymers and the PDMS‐b‐PHFBMA diblock copolymers showed that the introduction of the PMMA segments promote the fluorine segregation onto the surface and decrease the fluorine content in the copolymers with low surface energy. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Amphiphilic block copolymer poly(lactic acid)‐block‐(glycidylazide polymer)‐block‐polystyrene: synthesis and self‐assembly

The triblock energetic copolymer poly(lactic acid)‐block‐(glycidylazide polymer)‐block‐polystyrene (PLA‐b‐GAP‐b‐PS) was synthesized successfully through atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) of styrene and ring‐opening polymerization of d,l ‐lactide. The energetic macroinitiator GAP‐Br, which was made from reacting equimolar GAP with α‐bromoisobutyryl bromide, firstly triggered the ATRP of styrene with its bromide group, and then the hydroxyl group on the GAP end of the resulting diblock copolymer participated in the polymerization of lactide in the presence of stannous octoate. The triblock copolymer PLA‐b‐GAP‐b‐PS had a narrow distribution of molecular weight. In the copolymer, the PS block was solvophilic in toluene and improved the stability of the structure, the PLA block was solvophobic in toluene and served as the sacrificial component for the preparation of porous materials, and GAP was the basic and energetic material. The three blocks of the copolymer were fundamentally thermodynamically immiscible, which led to the self‐assembly of the block copolymer in solution. Further studies showed that the concentration and solubility of the copolymer and the polarity of the solvent affected the morphology and size of the micelles generated from the self‐assembly of PLA‐b‐GAP‐b‐PS. The micelles generated in organic solvents at 10 mg mL^?1 copolymer concentration were spherical but became irregular when water was used as a co‐solvent. The spherical micelles self‐assembled in toluene had three distinct layers, with the diameter of the micelles increasing from 60 to 250 nm as the concentration of the copolymer increased from 5 to 15 mg L^?1. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compatibilization of low-density polyethylene/polystyrene blends by segmented EB(PS-block-EB) n block copolymers

Hydrogenated segmented poly[butadiene-block-(styrene-block-butadiene)_n] block copolymers, which were developed by use of a polymeric iniferter technique, were tested on their compatibilizing effectiveness for (10/90) LDPE/PS blends. They were found to be effective compatibilizers for this mixture, already giving a pronounced improvement in both tensile strength and strain of the blend at block copolymer concentrations of one percent. A concentration of five weight percent of segmented block copolymer provided a tenfold improvement in blend toughness. The effectiveness of the segmented block copolymers was found be dependent on the block copolymer composition. Block copolymer compositions of close to 50 : 50 EB : PS gave the best results. Received: 23 September 1996/Revised: 4 November 1996/Accepted: 7 November 1996     

Influence of semi‐crystalline poly(ε‐caprolactone) and non‐crystalline polylactide blocks on the thermal properties of polydimethylsiloxane‐based block copolymers

Poly(A)‐block‐poly(B), poly(A)‐block‐poly(B)‐block‐poly(A) and B(A)₂ block copolymers were prepared through coordinated anionic ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone (CL) and lactic acid (LA) using hydroxy‐terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) as initiator. A wide range of well‐defined combinations of PDMS‐block‐PCL and PDMS‐block‐PLA diblock copolymers, PCL‐block‐PDMS‐block‐PCL and PLA‐block‐PDMS‐block‐PLA triblock copolymers and star‐PDMS(PCL)₂ copolymers were thus obtained. The number‐average molar masses and the structure of the synthesized block copolymers were identified using various analytical techniques. The thermal properties of these copolymers were established using differential scanning calorimetry. Considering PDMS‐block‐PCL copolymers, the results demonstrate the complex effect of polymer architecture and PCL block length on the ability of the PDMS block to crystallize or not. In the case of diblock copolymers, crystallization of PCL blocks originated from stacking of adjacent chains inducing the extension of the PDMS block that can easily crystallize. In the case of star copolymers, the same tendency as in triblock copolymers is observed, showing a limited crystallization of PDMS when the length of the PCL block increases. In the case of PDMS‐block‐PLA copolymers, melting and crystallization transitions of the PLA block are never observed. Considering the diblock copolymers, PDMS sequences have the ability to crystallize. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compatibilizing effect of poly(styrene)‐block‐poly(isoprene) copolymers in heterogeneous poly(styrene)/natural rubber blends

Compatibility of poly(styrene) (PS)/natural rubber (NR) blend is improved by the addition of diblock copolymer of poly(styrene) and cis‐poly(isoprene) (PS‐b‐PI). The compatibilizing effect has been investigated as a function of block copolymer molecular weight, composition and concentration. The effect of homopolymer molecular weight, processing conditions and mode of addition on the morphology of the dispersed phase have also been investigated by means of optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. A sharp decrease in phase dimensions is observed with the addition of a few percent of block copolymers. The effect levels off at higher concentrations. The leveling off could be an indication of interfacial saturation. For concentrations below the critical value, the particle size reduction is linear with copolymer volume fraction and agrees well with the prediction of Noolandi and Hong. The addition of the block copolymer improves the mechanical properties of the blend. An attempt is made to correlate the mechanical properties with the morphology of the blends. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

A new synthetic approach to asymmetric amphiphilic ABA′ block copolymers by ATRP and click reactions

Well‐defined asymmetric amphiphilic ABA′ block copolymers composed of poly(ethylene oxide) monomethylene ether (MPEO) with different molecular weights as A or A′ block and poly(styrene) (PS) as B block were synthesized by the combination of atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) and click reactions. First, bromine‐terminated diblock copolymer poly(ethylene oxide) monomethylene ether‐block‐poly(styrene) (MPEO‐PS‐Br) was prepared by ATRP of styrene initiated with macroinitiator MPEO‐Br, which was prepared from the esterification of MPEO and 2‐bromoisobutyryl bromide. Then, the azido‐terminated diblock copolymers MPEO‐PS‐N₃ were prepared through the bromine substitution reaction with sodium azide. Propargyl‐terminated MPEO with a different molecular weight was prepared under the basic condition from propargyl alcohol and p‐toluenesulfonyl‐terminated MPEO, which was prepared through the esterification of MPEO and p‐toluenesulfochloride using pyridine as solvent. Asymmetric amphiphilic ABA′ block copolymers, with a wide range of number–average molecular weights from 1.92 × 10⁴ to 2.47 × 10⁴ and a narrow polydispersity from 1.03 to 1.05, were synthesized via a click reaction of the azido‐terminated diblock copolymers and the propargyl‐terminated MPEO in the presence of CuBr and 1,1,4,7,7‐pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (PMDETA) catalyst system. The structures of these ABA′ block copolymers and corresponding precursors were characterized by NMR, IR, and GPC. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Effect of cross‐linker on morphology,catalytic activity,and recyclability of immobilized palladium chloride

Two kinds of immobilized palladium (Pd) catalysts were prepared by reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer polymerization of pyridine‐containing monomer followed by immobilizing palladium chloride (PdCl₂) on block copolymers. Namely, one of them includes the cross‐linking structure of maleic anhydride with 1,6‐diaminohexane (cross‐linker), polystyrene‐block‐poly(4‐(4‐vinylbenzyloxy)butylpicolinate‐alt‐maleic anhydride)‐Pd (PS‐b‐P(VBP‐alt‐MAn)‐Pd), and the other is its non‐cross‐linking counterpart, polystyrene‐block‐poly(4‐(4‐vinylbenzyloxy) butylpicolinate)‐Pd (PS‐b‐PVBP‐Pd). From transmission electron microscopy images, it could be observed that they both assembled into micelles in the selective solvents. The Pd of PS‐b‐P(VBP‐alt‐MAn)‐Pd located in the core of micelles, whereas the Pd of PS‐b‐PVBP‐Pd was on the shell of the micelles. The PS‐b‐P(VBP‐alt‐MAn)‐Pd can be continuously used for five times without any appreciable loss of activity in the aqueous Suzuki‐coupling reaction. However, the catalytic activities of the PS‐b‐PVBP‐Pd decreased sharply with the increase in the recycle times. Thus, this promising cross‐linking strategy not only greatly restrained the loss of Pd in the catalytic cycles, but also effectively maintained the immobilized Pd catalyst's high activity. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Controllable self‐assembly of polystyrene‐block‐poly(2‐vinylpyridine)

Block copolymers can form various ordered structures by self‐assembly, and their composites with inorganic materials may give surprising properties. This review summarizes recent developments in the preparation, mechanism and application of various types of self‐assembly of polystyrene‐block‐poly(2‐vinylpyridine) (PS‐b‐P2VP). The focus of the review is on how to control the self‐assembly of the dynamic and ordered structure of PS‐b‐P2VP based materials by applying effective factors such as thermal annealing, solvent annealing, block composition and blending. Moreover, the combination of the self‐assembly of PS‐b‐P2VP and various nanoparticles, with potentials in drug delivery, sensors and catalysis, is highlighted. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compatibilization of poly(vinyl chloride) with polyamide and with polyolefin by using poly(lauryllactam‐random‐caprolactam‐block‐caprolactone)

The compatibilization of various poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blends was investigated. The blend systems were PVC‐polyamide 12 (PA12), PVC‐polypropylene (PP), and PVC‐ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber (EPDM) with a new compatibilizing agent, random‐block terpolymer poly(ω‐lauryllactam‐random‐?‐caprolactam‐block‐?‐caprolactone) or systems containing these copolymers. The results were compared to those obtained in previous studies using poly(ω‐lauryllactam‐block‐?‐caprolactone) copolymer. The new block copolymer was specially synthesized by reactive extrusion. Observation by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that compatibilized blends had a finer morphology than the noncompatibilized blends. Addition of 10 weight percent (wt%) of block copolymer proved to be sufficient to give a significant improvement of the mechanical properties of the immiscible PVC blends at room temperature and at high temperatures that were above the glass transition temperature of PVC. For polyolefins, a three‐component compatibilizing system including maleated polypropylene, polyamide 12, and block copolymer was used. It was found that poly(ω‐lauryllactam‐random‐?‐caprolactam‐block‐?‐caprolactone) was the more efficient compatibilizing agent for the modification of PVC‐polyamide 12, PVC‐polypropylene, and PVC‐ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber blends. J. VINYL. ADDIT. TECHNOL., 11:95–110, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers