Comparison between of TRISS and ASCOT methods--in Tainan area. Trauma and Injury Severity Score. A Severity Characterization of Trauma

In this study, we compare the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT) models by using NCKUH trauma registry to assess the performance of correct prediction in terms of sensitivity, specificity and misclassification rate. The database has accumulated to 5,672 cases, NCKUH 2,490; Chi-Mei 3,182 respectively. Blunt trauma mechanism was composed of 4, 892 (86.2%) while 552 (9.7%) were pertinent to penetrating. The male/female ratio is 2.4:1. Traffic accident is the major cause of injury (3, 472-(61.2%)), followed by work injury (723-(12.7%)); fall (702-(12.4%)) and burn injuries (160-(2.8%)). The category of traffic accident is comprised of motorcycle-related, (1,257-(69.14%)), followed by automobile-related was (301-(16.56%)) and bicycle injuries (123-(6.8%)). The category of working injury comprised by machine crushed cases (332-(45.92%)) followed by cutting (148-(20.47%)) and impacts (69-(9.5%)). The overall mortality rate in our registry was 8.3%. ASCOT and TRISS were compared using sensitivity, specificity and misclassification rates. Each method had disadvantages in predicting outcomes of particular subgroups of patients. ASCOT tends to underestimate the probability of survival among patients with head/spinal injuries; while TRISS had a similar effect on multiple trauma victims. In conclusion, ASCOT is superior to TRISS in correctly predicting severe head trauma cases. However, both methods have their limitations in terms of accurate prediction. It is our hope to develop a mixed, revised model to better predict patients survival probability. Therefore, it is feasible to adopt ASCOT methodology in prediction of trauma patients in Taiwan. Expanded database and better methodology need to be developed in further study.     

Multicenter, randomized, prospective trial of early tracheostomy

OBJECTIVES: Determine the effect of early (days 3-5) or late (days 10-14) tracheostomy on intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), frequency of pneumonia, and mortality, and evidence of short-term or long-term pharyngeal, laryngeal, or tracheal injury in head trauma, non-head trauma, and critically ill nontrauma patients. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, prospective. SETTING: Five Level I trauma centers. METHODS: Data were obtained prospectively and included Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score (AIII), Glasgow Coma Scale score, Emergency Room Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, Acute Injury Score, type of endotracheal tube or tracheostomy, level of positive end-expiratory pressure, and peak inspiratory pressure. Patients were to undergo laryngoscopy for detection of injury according to the Lindholm criteria at the time of endotracheal tube or tracheostomy removal and be reevaluated at 3 to 5 months after discharge. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients were entered, 127 to early randomization (3-5 days) and 28 to late randomization (10-14 days); however, only 112 patients with early and 14 with late randomization had completed data forms for the primary study goals. An additional 22 patients from the early entry groups were rerandomized late. Early randomization data: the AIII score was higher (p < 0.05) in the head trauma tracheostomy (65 +/- 4) than in the nontracheostomy group (51 +/- 4) and in the nontrauma tracheostomy (92 +/- 6) than in the nontracheostomy group (68 +/- 7), but was equivalent in the non-head trauma group. Glasgow Coma Scale score, Emergency Room Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, Acute Injury Score, positive end-expiratory pressure, and peak inspiratory pressure were not significantly different in any of the groups. There were no significant differences in ICU LOS, frequency of pneumonia, or death in any of the groups after either early or late tracheostomy compared with continued endotracheal intubation. Only 83 patients underwent postextubation laryngoscopy. There were no significant differences between the groups; however, there were trends to more vocal cord ulceration and subglottic inflammation in the continued intubation group. No patient was seen in this study with late vocal cord or laryngeal stenosis; there were no tracheal-innominate artery fistulae. Seven of the patients with abnormal findings at extubation had normal 3- to 5-month postextubation laryngoscopy. CONCLUSION: Physician bias limited patient entry into the study. Although there were higher AIII scores in the head trauma early tracheostomy patients, there were no differences in the primary end points of ICU LOS, pneumonia, or death in any of the groups studied. Long-term endoscopic follow-up was poor, but no known late tracheal stenosis was seen.     

Intestinal permeability correlates with severity of injury in trauma patients

BACKGROUND: Increased intestinal permeability (IP) and the release of toxic intraluminal materials have been implicated in the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiple organ failure (MOF) observed in patients after severe trauma. Previous studies of intestinal permeability have failed to demonstrate a correlation between early measurements of IP and indicators of injury severity. This study examines the relationship between standard measures of injury severity and the early (day 1) and delayed (day 4) changes in IP. Associations between IP and the development of SIRS, MOF, and infectious complications were also studied. METHODS: The metabolically inactive markers lactulose (L) and mannitol (M) were used to measure IP in 29 consecutive patients who sustained injuries that required admission to the surgical intensive care unit and in 10 healthy control subjects. Measurements were made within 24 hours of admission and on hospital day 4. Severity of injury was assessed by A Severity Characterization of Trauma (ASCOT), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. Postinjury infections and parameters of SIRS and MOF were recorded. RESULTS: The IP of healthy volunteers (L/M, 0.025 +/- 0.008) was within the normal range (L/M < or = 0.03), whereas the average IP in injured patients was increased both within 24 hours (L/M, 0.139 +/- 0.172) and on the fourth hospital day (L/M, 0.346 +/- 0.699). No significant correlation between severity of injury and increased IP was seen within 24 hours of injury. A significant correlation was seen on hospital day 4, however, with all severity indices measured (ASCOT: r = 0.93, R2 = 0.87, p < 0.001; TRISS: r = 0.93, R2 = 0.87, p < 0.001; ISS: r = 0.84, R2 = 0.70, p < 0.001; RTS: r = 0.68, R2 = 0.47, p = 0.002; APACHE II score: r = 0.51, R2 = 0.26, p = 0.04). Patients with markedly increased IP (L/M > or = 0.100) experienced a significant increase in the development of SIRS (83 vs. 44%; p = 0.03) and subsequent infectious complications (58 vs. 13%; p = 0.01) and showed close correlation with the multiple organ dysfunction scores (r = 0.87, R2 = 0.76, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These observations demonstrate that the increased IP observed after trauma correlates with severity of injury only after 72 to 96 hours and not within the initial 24 hours of injury. A large increase in IP is associated with the development of SIRS, multiple organ dysfunction, and an increased incidence of infectious complications.     

Avoiding false positives in colony PCR

BACKGROUND: The Injury Severity Score (ISS) does not take into account multiple injuries in the same body region, whereas a New ISS (NISS) may provide a more accurate measure of trauma severity by considering the patient's three greatest injuries regardless of body region. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ISS and NISS in patients with blunt trauma. METHODS: Consecutive individuals treated from January of 1992 to September of 1996 at one institution were included if they had sustained blunt trauma and satisfied triage standards (n = 2,328). For each patient, we computed the ISS and the NISS to determine how often the two scores were identical or discrepant. Discrepant cases were then further analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves to determine which score better predicted short-term mortality. RESULTS: The mean ISS was 25 +/- 13, and the mean NISS was 33 +/- 18. The two predictive scores were identical in 32% of patients and discrepant in 68% of patients. Patients with identical scores had a lower mortality rate than patients with discrepant scores (10% vs. 13%; p < 0.02). In patients with discrepant scores, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was greater for the NISS than the ISS (0.852 vs. 0.799; p < 0.001), and greater amounts of discrepancy were associated with increasing rates of mortality (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The NISS often increases the apparent severity of injury and provides a more accurate prediction of short-term mortality. The benefit associated with using the NISS rather than the ISS must be weighed against the disadvantages of changing a scoring system and the potential for still greater improvements.     

A comparison of the association of helicopter and ground ambulance transport with the outcome of injury in trauma patients transported from the scene

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensive emergency medical services and helicopter aeromedical transport systems have been developed based on the principle that early definitive care improves outcome. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between patients transported by helicopter and those transported by ground. METHODS: Data were obtained from the North Carolina Trauma Registry for the period between 1987 and 1993 on all patients transported by helicopter and ground admitted to one of the eight state designated trauma centers. Study patients included only those who were transported directly from the scene of injury to the trauma center (interhospital transfers were excluded). Mortality (outcome) was compared after patient stratification by injury severity and transport time, using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistics and logistic regression-derived probabilities of survival. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred forty-six patients (7.3% of the total) were transported from scene to trauma center by helicopter and 17,144 were transported by ground. In patients transported by helicopter, the mean Trauma Score was lower (12 +/- 3.6) versus 14.3 +/- 3.6 (p < 0.001) and the mean Injury Severity Score was higher (17 +/- 11.1) versus 10.8 +/- 8.4 (p < 0.001). A trend toward increased survival was observed among patients transported by helicopter with a higher Injury Severity Score. Statistical significance was achieved only for patients with a Trauma Score between 5 and 12 and Injury Severity Score between 21 and 30. CONCLUSION: The large majority of trauma patients transported by both helicopter and ground ambulance have low injury severity measures. Outcomes were not uniformly better among patients transported by helicopter. Only a very small subset of patients transported by helicopter appear to have any chance of improved survival based on their helicopter transport. This study suggests that further effort should be expended to try to better identify patients who may benefit from this expensive and risky mode of transport.     

Regional audit of pedestrian accident care

In all, 160 serious pedestrian accidents (ISS > 15 or death), were recorded during a 12-month prospective study of all trauma in a population of 3.2 million. Of these, 35 died at scene, 125 arrived at hospital alive and 68 (54 per cent) subsequently died. There were 35 (22 per cent) children, and 62 per cent (39) were more than 60 years of age. Prehospital care significantly delayed transfer to hospital. In the accident and emergency department, only 38 per cent of those unconscious had a cervical collar applied, and only 67 per cent were intubated. Of those transferred for neurosurgical care, 34 per cent were not intubated. The Median Injury Severity Score for each outcome group was similar between age groups. The Revised Trauma Score and APACHE II score showed significant differences between those who lived and died. TRISS analysis revealed that 32 per cent of deaths and 12 per cent of survivors were unexpected. ATLS treatment protocols should be instituted for prehospital care and in all accident and emergency departments (A&E).     

Outcome of blunt thoracic aortic injury in a level I trauma center: an 8-year review

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience with blunt thoracic aortic injury and identify factors predictive of outcome. METHODS: Hospital charts, trauma registry data, and autopsies of 64 patients with blunt thoracic aortic injury from 1988 to 1995 were reviewed. RESULTS: Patients were identified and segregated based on admission physiology. Group 1 patients (n = 19) arrived in arrest. Group 2 patients (n = 10) arrived in shock with systolic BP 90. Group 3 patients (n = 35) arrived with systolic BP>90. All patients in groups 1 and 2 expired. Injury Severity Scores for nonsurvivors in group 3 (n = 12) were significantly higher than survivors. There were no significant differences when comparing time of injury to repair or arrival between groups, or in mortality or paralysis comparing repair techniques or clamp/bypass times. Double lumen endotracheal tubes caused significant operative delays compared to single lumen tubes. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of survivability were hemodynamic stability on arrival and lower Injury Severity Scores. In thoracic aortic injury patients arriving hemodynamically stable, Injury Severity Score correlated with mortality but not paralysis.     

Value of thoracic computed tomography in the first assessment of severely injured patients with blunt chest trauma: results of a prospective study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate whether early thoracic computed tomography (TCT) is superior to routine chest x-ray (CXR) in the diagnostic work-up of blunt thoracic trauma and whether the additional information influences subsequent therapeutic decisions on the early management of severely injured patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective study of 103 consecutive patients with clinical or radiologic signs of chest trauma (94 multiple injured patients with chest trauma, nine patients with isolated chest trauma), an average Injury Severity Score of 30 and an average Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax score of 3, initial CXR and TCT were compared after initial assessment in our emergency department of a Level I trauma center. RESULTS: In 67 patients (65%) TCT detected major chest trauma complications that have been missed on CXR (lung contusion (n = 33), pneumothorax (n = 27), residual pneumothorax after chest tube placement (n = 7), hemothorax (n = 21), displaced chest tube (n = 5), diaphragmatic rupture (n = 2), myocardial rupture (n = 1)). In 11 patients only minor additional pathologic findings (dystelectasis, small pleural effusion) were visualized on TCT, and in 14 patients CXR and TCT showed the same pathologic results. Eleven patients underwent both CXR and TCT without pathologic fundings. The TCT scan was significantly more effective than routine CXR in detecting lung contusions (p < 0.001), pneumothorax (p < 0.005), and hemothorax (p < 0.05). In 42 patients (41%) the additional TCT findings resulted in a change of therapy: chest tube placement, chest tube correction of pneumothoraces or large hemothoraces (n = 31), change in mode of ventilation and respiratory care (n = 14), influence on the management of fracture stabilization (n = 12), laparotomy in cases of diaphragmatic lacerations (n = 2), bronchoscopy for atelectasis (n = 2), exclusion of aortic rupture (n = 2), endotracheal intubation (n = 1), and pericardiocentesis (n = 1). To evaluate the efficacy of all those therapeutic changes after TCT the rates of respiratory failure, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and mortality in the subgroup of patients with Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax score of > 2 were compared with a historical control group, consisting of 84 patients with multiple trauma and with blunt chest trauma Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax score of > 2, prospectively studied between 1986 and 1992. Age (38 vs. 39 years), average Injury Severity Score (33 vs. 38), and the rate of respiratory failure (36 vs. 56%) were not statistically different between the two groups, but the rates of adult respiratory distress syndrome (8 vs. 20%; p < 0.05) and mortality (10 vs. 21%; p < 0.05) were significantly reduced in the TCT group. CONCLUSIONS: TCT is highly sensitive in detecting thoracic injuries after blunt chest trauma and is superior to routine CXR in visualzing lung contusions, pneumothorax, and hemothorax. Early TCT influences therapeutic management in a significant number of patients. We therefore recommend TCT in the initial diagnostic work-up of patients with multiple injuries and with suspected chest trauma because early and exact diagnosis of all thoracic injuries along with sufficient therapeutic consequences may reduce complications and improve outcome of severely injured patients with blunt chest trauma.     

Modeling injury outcomes using time-to-event methods

BACKGROUND: Mortality is an important measurement of injury outcomes, but measurements reflecting disability or cost are also important. Hospital length of stay (LOS) has been used as an outcome variable, but reduced LOS could be achieved either by improved care or by increased mortality. A solution to this statistical problem of "competing risks" would enable injury outcomes based on LOS to be modeled using time-to-event methods. METHODS: Time-to-event methodology was applied to 2,106 cases with complete data from the 1991-1994 registry of a regional trauma center. LOS was used as the outcome variable, modified by assigning an arbitrarily long LOS to any fatal case. A combination of proportional hazards and logistic regression models was used to explore the effects of potential predictive variables, including Trauma Score (TS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), components of TS or ISS, age, sex, alcohol use, and whether a patient was transferred. RESULTS: The "TRISS" combination of TS, ISS, and age previously shown to predict mortality also predicted "modified LOS" (Wald p value less than 0.001 for each variable). Models using only age and certain components of ISS or TS fit our data even better, with fewer parameters. Other variables were not predictive. Modified Kaplan-Meier plots provided easily interpreted graphical results, combining both mortality and LOS information. CONCLUSIONS: With a simple modification to allow for competing risks, time-to-event methods enable more informative modeling of injury outcomes than binary (lived/died) methods alone. Such models may be useful for describing and comparing groups of hospitalized trauma patients.     

Review of liver trauma management in Tasmania: an analysis of risk factors for mortality and morbidity

A review of liver trauma treated by the major trauma care facilities of Tasmania in the 5 year period between 1989 and 1993 is presented. The aim of this retrospective review was to provide an audit of the management of liver trauma in the island of Tasmania and to analyse the risk factors contributing to mortality and major morbidity. Thirty-seven patients were treated with a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 14 (range 9-34). The overall mortality rate of this series was 5.8%. Age, mechanism of injury (blunt or penetrating), delay prior to hospital presentation and modality of treatment (operative or non-operative) were not significant risk factors for mortality and morbidity; however, transfusion requirement of over 10 units of blood (P < 0.005), ISS score of over 20 (P < 0.0005), haemodynamic instability at presentation (P < 0.05) and a Hepatic Injury Score (HIS) grade of 3 or more (P < 0.05) were statistically significant risk factors.     

Bioavailability of iron in cottonseed meal, ferric sulfate, and two ferrous sulfate by-products of the galvanizing industry

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of severe blunt trauma in children receiving prehospital care from either physician-staffed advanced life support (ALS) units, or from basic life support (BLS) units staffed by emergency medical technicians. METHODS: The records of 288 children with severe blunt trauma who required intensive care in the regional level 1 trauma center or who died from their injuries were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were excluded if resuscitation at the scene was not attempted, if the level of prehospital care was unspecified, or if arrival at the level 1 trauma center was delayed beyond 150 minutes. Seventy-two patients met the inclusion criteria of BLS-, and 49 the criteria of ALS-prehospital care. RESULTS: A reduced mortality rate (22.4% v 31.9%) was seen in the ALS group, which was more apparent in a "salvageable but high-risk" subgroup, characterized by Glasgow Coma of Scale 4 through 8, Pediatric Trauma Score of 0 through 5, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 25 through 49. However, a statistically significant difference was only seen when trauma severity was evaluated by the ISS. CONCLUSION: An improved outcome in children with severe blunt trauma has been demonstrated when prehospital care is provided by physician-staffed ALS units compared with BLS units.     

Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the brains of scrapie-infected mice

Thoracic trauma in the elderly population constitutes a major challenge for both thoracic and trauma surgeons as their presentation and outcomes differ from the adult population in addition to their high morbidity and mortality. One hundred and one patients, 60 years of age or older, with thoracic trauma were treated at Dicle University School of Medicine during a 6-year period. Eighty-five per cent were male and 15% were female with a mean age of 64.5 years. The cause of thoracic injury was blunt in 77.2% and penetrating in 22.8% of the patients. Sixty-two patients (61.4%) had isolated thoracic injuries. The median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 23. The morbidity rate was 23.8%. The mortality rate was 16.8%. Seven of 10 patients (70%) who had an ISS greater than 25 died, whereas six of 24 (25%) patients with an ISS between 17 and 25, and four of 67 (5.9%) patients with an ISS less than 16 died. In the elderly the morbidity and mortality rates were higher for blunt trauma compared with penetrating trauma. For ISS greater than 25 the mortality rate was 71.4% for blunt and 66.6% for penetrating trauma. As the morbidity and mortality rate are significantly higher in the elderly patients the approach to these patients should include recognition of their high risk for morbidity and mortality, especially for those who had an ISS greater than 25.     

Trauma in pregnancy: the role of interpersonal violence

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine what role interpersonal violence as intentional injury plays in the pregnant trauma victim. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective review of medical records. RESULTS: During a 9-year period in a single university medical and trauma center, 203 pregnant women were treated for a physically traumatic event. Sixty-four women (31.5%) were victims of intentional injury, in most cases by the husband or boyfriend. Although the mean Injury Severity Score was higher in women with fetal death than in women with successful pregnancy outcomes (7.25 vs 1.74, respectively; p < 0.01), 5 of the 8 women with fetal losses incurred these despite an apparent absence of physical injury (maternal Injury Severity Score = 0). CONCLUSIONS: Interpersonal violence during pregnancy is a frequent and increasingly common cause of maternal injury. The inconsistent relationship between Injury Severity Score and serious fetal injury or death is underscored by the loss of 5 fetuses despite an Injury Severity Score of 0.     

Retinal detachment with vitreous hemorrhage

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of prehospital advanced life support (PALS) on the survival of victims of severe trauma in our hospital. During a period of 24 months, 46 patients with severe trauma were admitted to our Emergency Department after receiving PALS; this included endotracheal intubation and ventilatory support (IVS) in 35 cases, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in 11. The severity of the trauma in this group of patients was confirmed by assessing the clinical condition on admission and the Glasgow Coma Scale score (mean = 4.0, median = 3), the Revised Trauma score (mean = 4.1, median = 4) and the Injury Severity Score (mean = 44.5 and median = 41 in blunt trauma; mean = 58.3 and median = 75 in penetrating trauma). The overall survival was 41%. The survival rate was 48% in patients with prehospital IVS rate and 18% in those receiving CPR. We conclude that PALS in severe trauma was able to save the lives of many patients at high risk of dying before reaching hospital.     

Prevention of abdominal compartment syndrome by absorbable mesh prosthesis closure

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prevention of the abdominal compartment syndrome after celiotomy for trauma justifies the use of absorbable mesh prosthesis closure in severely injured patients. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of case series from July 1, 1989, to July 31, 1996. SETTING: University-based level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Seventy-three consecutive trauma patients requiring celiotomy who received absorbable mesh prosthesis closure and 73 control patients matched for injury severity and trauma type who received celiotomy without a mesh prosthesis closure. INTERVENTIONS: Absorbable mesh prosthesis closure was used in cases of excessive fascial tension, abdominal compartment syndrome, necrotizing fasciitis, traumatic defect, or planned reoperation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, Injury Severity Score, Abdominal Trauma Index, highest abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale score, number of abdominal/pelvic injuries, highest head Abbreviated Injury Scale score, shock, indication for mesh closure, complications, number of operations and time required for closure, days in the intensive care unit, length of stay, and mortality were determined. The highest abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale score was multiplied by the number of abdominal/pelvic injuries to calculate the abdominal pelvic trauma score. RESULTS: Group 1 consisted of 47 patients who received mesh at initial celiotomy, and group 2, 26 patients who received mesh at a subsequent celiotomy. These 2 groups were statistically similar in demographics, injury severity, and mortality. However, group 2 had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative abdominal compartment syndrome (35% vs 0%), necrotizing fasciitis (39% vs 0%), intra-abdominal abscess/peritonitis (35% vs 4%), and enterocutaneous fistula (23% vs 11%) compared with group 1 (P < .001). Group 1 patients with preoperative abdominal compartment syndrome had more abdominal/ pelvic injuries and higher abdominal trauma index than matched controls (P < .05). There was a trend toward higher abdominal pelvic trauma score in patients who developed abdominal compartment syndrome. The Pearson coefficient of correlation between the abdominal trauma index and the more easily calculated abdominal pelvic trauma score was 0.91 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The use of absorbable mesh prosthesis closure in severely injured patients undergoing celiotomy was effective in treating and preventing the abdominal compartment syndrome.     

Epidemiology of immediate and early trauma deaths at an urban Level I trauma center

The objective of this study is to identify and differentiate the injury patterns and causes of death among patients who died within the 1st hour and those in the period between 1 and 48 hours after hospital admission. Information was collected from the 1994 to 1996 trauma data base at an urban Level I trauma center. The records of 155 trauma patients who died within the 1st hour (immediate trauma death, ITD) and between 1 and 48 hours (early trauma death, ETD) were examined retrospectively. Total and constituent Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma Score (TS), and Glasgow Coma Score were analyzed. ITDs constituted 49 per cent of all deaths within 48 hours. Blunt mechanisms accounted for 37 per cent of ITDs and 40 per cent of ETDs (not significant), whereas penetrating trauma accounted for 59 per cent of ITDs and 56 per cent of ETDs (not significant). Exsanguination most commonly caused death among ITDs (54%) and head injury (51%) among ETDs (P < 0.01). Patients who died within the 1st hour had higher ISS (42.6 +/- 23.2, P < 0.03), lower TS (1.7 +/- 1.9, P < 0.0001), and lower Glasgow Coma Score (3.1 +/- 1.1, P < 0.0001) than those who died after the 1st hour. Patients with ITD had a significantly worse chest ISS than those with ETD (47.4 +/- 28.6 vs 19.0 +/- 19.1, P < 0.0001). We conclude that 1) ITD is caused primarily by exsanguination, whereas ETD is largely due to the sequelae of severe neurologic injury; 2) ITD has a significantly lower TS and higher ISS than ETD; and 3) thoracic injuries are more severe among patients with ITDs than among those with ETDs. The severity of thoracic injury among ITDs suggests that rapid surgical intervention is critical during the resuscitation of these severely injured patients.     

Is colostomy always necessary in the treatment of open pelvic fractures?

BACKGROUND: Wound management in open pelvic fractures has used fecal diversion, debridement, and closure by secondary intention to prevent pelvic sepsis. Colostomy care and takedown adds to the morbidity and resource utilization of this approach. We reviewed our experience to determine if a selective approach to fecal diversion based on wound location was possible. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients admitted to a Level I trauma center during an 8-year period. Fractures were classified as open if the fracture was in continuity with the wound. Wounds were classified as perineal if they involved the rectum, ischiorectal fossa, or genitalia, and as nonperineal if they involved the pubis anteriorly, iliac crest, or anterior thigh. Pelvic sepsis was defined as cellulitis, fasciitis, or infection of a pelvic hematoma. Diversion consisted of loop or end colostomy. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with open fractures were identified. Four died from closed head injury and blood loss. The remaining 14 were treated as follows. Five patients with perineal wounds had diversion of their fecal stream. Their Injury Severity Score was 34 +/- 8.3 and their Revised Trauma Score was 7.69 +/- 0.15. No patient developed pelvic sepsis. Nine patients with nonperineal wounds did not undergo diversion. Their Injury Severity Score was 28.6 +/- 5.3 and their Revised Trauma Score was 7.36 +/- 0.45. No patients developed pelvic sepsis in the nondiverted group. CONCLUSION: No patients with anterior wounds and an intact fecal stream developed pelvic sepsis. Colostomy may not be necessary in all patients with open pelvic fracture. Protocols using fecal diversion based on wound location appear to be safe and may decrease resource utilization and subsequent morbidity related to colostomy closure.     

Differences in mortality between elderly and younger adult trauma patients: geriatric status increases risk of delayed death

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients suffer higher mortality rates after trauma than younger patients. This increased mortality is attributable to age, preexisting disease, and complications as well as injury severity. METHODS: Records from 5,139 adult patients from a Level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), early mortality (<24 hours), and late mortality (>24 hours) were determined for elderly (> or =65 years) and younger (16-64 years) patients. Preexisting diseases and complications were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis coding. RESULTS: Mortality in elderly patients was twice that in younger patients despite equivalent injury severity (p < 0.001), and elderly patients were more likely to suffer later death than younger patients (p < 0.005). The prevalence of preexisting disease was greater in the elderly, as was the incidence of complications. Using logistic regression, ISS, RTS, preexisting cardiovascular or liver disease, the development of cardiac, renal, or infectious complications, and geriatric status were all independently predictive of late mortality (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Elderly trauma patients more frequently suffer late mortality than younger patients because of the combination of injury and increased preexisting disease and complications after injury. Aggressive treatment of the elderly trauma patient is warranted; however, in the face of significant preexisting disease or complications, survival is less likely. Predictive models of survival can be developed, taking into account preexisting disease and complications as well as admission parameters such as age, ISS, and RTS, and specific risk of mortality quantitated.     

Basic life support versus advanced life support for injured patients with an injury severity score of 10 or more

To study the value of advanced life support (ALS) compared with basic life support (BLS) for penetrating and motor vehicle crash (MVC) patients, data were collected from eight hospitals over 24 months on 781 consecutive patients with Injury Severity Scores > or = 10 as well as on a subset of 219 hypotensive patients. Initial prehospital Revised Trauma Scores (RTSs) were compared with initial emergency department RTSs. Scene times, total prehospital times, and the use of a pneumatic antishock garment (PASG), intravenous fluids, and endotracheal intubation were also documented. A modified TRISS method was used to compare mortality rates. The MVC ALS patients showed improvement in mean RTSs between prehospital and the emergency department while MVC BLS patients did not. Mean changes in blood pressure (BP) and the percentage of patients with improved BP were significantly higher among patients who received ALS; ALS was associated with increased use of PASGs and IV fluids. There were no differences between groups with respect to observed versus predicted mortality. Similar results were found in the hypotensive subset of patients. No benefit from the use of ALS for trauma patients with total prehospital times of less than 35 minutes was documented.     

Acute and long-term outcomes of extremely injured blunt trauma victims

Long-term outcomes after blunt trauma remain poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to document such outcomes in extremely injured adults (Injury Severity Score > or = 50). From April 1990 to June 1993, 76 patients (5% of all trauma victims) had an ISS > or = 50 at a single trauma center. Thirty-five (46%) survived to hospital discharge. The mean duration of hospital stay was longer for survivors than for nonsurvivors (92 days versus 16 days, p < 0.001). Of the 35 survivors, 26% were discharged directly home, 60% to a rehabilitation hospital, 8% to a chronic care facility, and 6% to an acute care hospital. After a mean follow-up of 27 months, 6% had died, 9% refused participation, and the remaining 30 patients (91% of long-term survivors) demonstrated significant residual disabilities in physical, emotional, and mental health status. We suggest that extremely injured patients comprise a small proportion of blunt trauma victims, consume substantial acute care hospital resources, often survive, and yet frequently have residual disability. A reduction in this long-term disability may represent the greatest challenge in modern trauma care.