The conjoinability relation in Lambek calculus and linear logic

In 1958 J. Lambek introduced a calculusL of syntactic types and defined an equivalence relation on types: x y means that there exists a sequence x=x₁,...,x_n=y (n 1), such thatx _i x _i+1 or x_i+ x _i (1 i n). He pointed out thatx y if and only if there is joinz such thatx z andy z. This paper gives an effective characterization of this equivalence for the Lambeck calculiL andLP, and for the multiplicative fragments of Girard's and Yetter's linear logics. Moreover, for the non-directed Lambek calculusLP and the multiplicative fragment of Girard's linear logic, we present linear time algorithms deciding whether two types are equal, and finding a join for them if they are.The author was sponsored by project NF 102/62-356 (Structural and Semantic Parallels in Natural Languages and Programming Languages), funded by the Netherlands Organization for the Advancement of Research (N.W.O.).     

Computations in fragments of intuitionistic propositional logic

This article is a report on research in progress into the structure of finite diagrams of intuitionistic propositional logic with the aid of automated reasoning systems for larger calculations. Afragment of a propositional logic is the set of formulae built up from a finite number of propositional variables by means of a number of connectives of the logic, among which possibly non-standard ones like ¬¬ or which are studied here. Thediagram of that fragment is the set of equivalence classes of its formulae partially ordered by the derivability relation. N.G. de Bruijn's concept of exact model has been used to construct subdiagrams of the [p, q, , , ¬]-fragment.     

Obvious inferences

The notion of obvious inference in predicate logic is discussed from the viewpoint of proof-checker applications in logic and mathematics education. A class of inferences in predicate logic is defined and it is proposed to identify it with the class of obvious logical inferences. The definition is compared with other approaches. The algorithm for implementing the obviousness decision procedure follows directly from the definition.     

Analyzing the Core of Categorial Grammar

Even though residuation is at the core of Categorial Grammar (Lambek, 1958), it is not always immediate to realize how standard logical systems like Multi-modal Categorial Type Logics (MCTL) (Moortgat, 1997) actually embody this property. In this paper, we focus on the basic system NL (Lambek, 1961) and its extension with unary modalities NL() (Moortgat, 1996), and we spell things out by means of Display Calculi (DC) (Belnap, 1982; Goré, 1998). The use of structural operators in DC permits a sharp distinction between the core properties we want to impose on the logical system and the way these properties are projected into the logical operators. We will show how we can obtain Lambek residuated triple \, / and of binary operators, and how the operators and introduced by Moortgat (1996) are indeed their unary counterpart.In the second part of the paper we turn to other important algebraic properties which are usually investigated in conjunction with residuation (Birkhoff, 1967): Galois and dual Galois connections. Again, DC let us readily define logical calculi capturing them. We also provide preliminary ideas on how to use these new operators when modeling linguistic phenomena.     

Higher-Order and Modal Logic as a Framework for Explanation-Based Generalization

Certain tasks, such as formal program development and theorem proving, fundamentally rely upon the manipulation of higher-order objects such as functions and predicates. Computing tools intended to assist in performing these tasks are at present inadequate in both the amount of knowledge they contain (i.e., the level of support they provide) and in their ability to learn (i.e., their capacity to enhance that support over time). The application of a relevant machine learning technique—explanation-based generalization (EBG)—has thus far been limited to first-order problem representations. We extend EBG to generalize higher-order values, thereby enabling its application to higher-order problem encodings.Logic programming provides a uniform framework in which all aspects of explanation-based generalization and learning may be defined and carried out. First-order Horn logics (e.g., Prolog) are not, however, well suited to higher-order applications. Instead, we employ Prolog, a higher-order logic programming language, as our basic framework for realizing higher-order EBG. In order to capture the distinction between domain theory and training instance upon which EBG relies, we extend Prolog with the necessity operator of modal logic. We develop a meta-interpreter realizing EBG for the extended language, Prolog, and provide examples of higher-order EBG.     

Validating the PSL/Sugar Semantics Using Automated Reasoning

The Accellera organisation selected Sugar, IBMs formal specification language, as the basis for a standard to drive assertion-based verification in the electronics industry. Sugar combines regular expressions, Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) and Computation Tree Logic (CTL) into a property language intended for both static verification (e.g. model checking) and dynamic verification (e.g. simulation). In 2003 Accellera decided to rename the evolving standard to Accellera Property Specification Language (or PSL for short). We motivate and describe a deep semantic embedding of PSL in the version of higher-order logic supported by the HOL 4 theorem-proving system. The main goal of this paper is to demonstrate that mechanised theorem proving can be a useful aid to the validation of the semantics of an industrial design language.     

Implementing the ‘Fool's model’ of combinatory logic

This paper studies Fool's models of combinatory logic, and relates them to Hindley's D-completeness problem. A fool's model is a family of sets of formulas, closed under condensed detachment. Alternatively, it is a model ofCL in naive set theory. We examine Resolution; and the P-W problem. A sequel shows T is D-complete; also, its extensions. We close with an implementation FMO of these ideas.     

Relevant logic programming

In this paper we present a fragment of (positive) relevant logic which can be computed by a straightforward extension to SLD resolution while allowing full nesting of implications. These two requirements lead quite naturally to a fragment in which the major feature is an ambiguous user-level conjunction which is interpreted intensionally in query positions and extensionally in assertion positions. These restrictions allow a simple and efficient extension to SLD resolution (and more particularly, the PROLOG evaluation scheme) with quite minor loss in expressive power.     

Condensed detachment is complete for relevance logic: A computer-aided proof

The condensed detachment ruleD is a combination of modus ponens with a minimal amount of substitution. EarlierD has been shown to be complete for intuitionistic and classical implicational logic but incomplete forBCK andBCI logic. We show thatD is complete for the relevance logic. One of the main steps is the proof of the formula ((a a) a) a found in interaction with our resolution theorem prover. Various strategies of generating consequences of the axioms and choosing best ones for the next iteration were tried until the proof was found.     

Defaults as restrictions on classical Hilbert-style proofs

Since the earliest formalisation of default logic by Reiter many contributions to this appealing approach to nonmonotonic reasoning have been given. The different formalisations are here presented in a general framework that gathers the basic notions, concepts and constructions underlying default logic. Our view is to interpret defaults as special rules that impose a restriction on the juxtaposition of monotonic Hubert-style proofs of a given logicL. We propose to describe default logic as a logic where the juxtaposition of default proofs is subordinate to a restriction condition . Hence a default logic is a pair (L, ) where properties of the logic , like compactness, can be interpreted through the restriction condition . Different default systems are then given a common characterization through a specific condition on the logicL. We also prove cumulativity for any default logic (L, ) by slightly modifying the notion of default proof. We extend, in fact, the language ofL in a way close to that followed by Brewka in the formulation of his cumulative default system. Finally we show the existence of infinitely many intermediary default logics, depending on and called linear logics, which lie between Reiter's and ukaszewicz' versions of default logic.Work carried out in the framework of the agreement between Italian PT Administration and FUBLaforia, Université Paris VI Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 Place Jussieu,Tour 46, 75252 Paris, France     

An Algebraic Approach to Propositional Fuzzy Logic

We investigate the variety corresponding to a logic (introduced in Esteva and Godo, 1998, and called there), which is the combination of ukasiewicz Logic and Product Logic, and in which Gödel Logic is interpretable. We present an alternative (and slightly simpler) axiomatization of such variety. We also investigate the variety, called the variety of algebras, corresponding to the logic obtained from by the adding of a constant and of a defining axiom for one half. We also connect algebras with structures, called f-semifields, arising from the theory of lattice-ordered rings, and prove that every algebra can be regarded as a structure whose domain is the interval [0, 1] of an f-semifield , and whose operations are the truncations of the operations of to [0, 1]. We prove that such a structure is uniquely determined by up to isomorphism, and we establish an equivalence between the category of algebras and that of f-semifields.     

On Some Alleged Misconceptions about Fuzzy Logic

Entemann (2002) defends fuzzy logic by pointing to what he calls misconceptions concerning fuzzy logic. However, some of these ;misconceptions are in fact truths, and it is Entemann who has the misconceptions. The present article points to mistakes made by Entemann in three different areas. It closes with a discussion of what sort of general considerations it would take to motivate fuzzy logic.     

One Connection between Standard Invariance Conditions on Modal Formulas and Generalized Quantifiers

The language of standard propositional modal logic has one operator ( or ), that can be thought of as being determined by the quantifiers or , respectively: for example, a formula of the form is true at a point s just in case all the immediate successors of s verify .This paper uses a propositional modal language with one operator determined by a generalized quantifier to discuss a simple connection between standard invariance conditions on modal formulas and generalized quantifiers: the combined generalized quantifier conditions of conservativity and extension correspond to the modal condition of invariance under generated submodels, and the modal condition of invariance under bisimulations corresponds to the generalized quantifier being a Boolean combination of and .     

Dualities between alternative semantics for logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning

The Gelfond-Lifschitz operator associated with a logic program (and likewise the operator associated with default theories by Reiter) exhibits oscillating behavior. In the case of logic programs, there is always at least one finite, nonempty collection of Herbrand interpretations around which the Gelfond-Lifschitz operator bounces around. The same phenomenon occurs with default logic when Reiter's operator is considered. Based on this, a stable class semantics and extension class semantics has been proposed. The main advantage of this semantics was that it was defined for all logic programs (and default theories), and that this definition was modelled using the standard operators existing in the literature such as Reiter's operator. In this paper our primary aim is to prove that there is a very interestingduality between stable class theory and the well-founded semantics for logic programming. In the stable class semantics, classes that were minimal with respect to Smyth's power-domain ordering were selected. We show that the well-founded semantics precisely corresponds to a class that is minimal w.r.t. Hoare's power domain ordering: the well-known dual of Smyth's ordering. Besides this elegant duality, this immediately suggests how to define a well-founded semantics for default logic in such a way that the dualities that hold for logic programming continue to hold for default theories. We show how the same technique may be applied to strong autoepistemic logic: the logic of strong expansions proposed by Marek and Truszczynski.     

Adding a temporal dimension to a logic system

We introduce a methodology whereby an arbitrary logic system L can be enriched with temporal features to create a new system T(L). The new system is constructed by combining L with a pure propositional temporal logic T (such as linear temporal logic with Since and Until) in a special way. We refer to this method as adding a temporal dimension to L or just temporalising L. We show that the logic system T(L) preserves several properties of the original temporal logic like soundness, completeness, decidability, conservativeness and separation over linear flows of time. We then focus on the temporalisation of first-order logic, and a comparison is make with other first-order approaches to the handling of time.     

What holds in a context?

In order to establish that [A] = [B] follows from a set of assumptions often one provesA =B and then invokes the principle of substitution of equals for equals. It has been observed that in the ancillary proof ofA =B one is allowed to use, in addition to those assumptions of which are free for , certain (open) sentencesP which may not be part of and may not follow from , but are related to the context . We show that in an appropriate formal system there is a closed form solution to the problem of determining precisely what sentencesP can be used. We say that those sentenceshold in the context under the set of assumptions . We suggest how the solution could be exploited in an interactive theorem prover.     

Application of artificial neural network and fuzzy logic in a case-based system for initial process parameter setting of injection molding

Determination of initial process meters for injection molding is a highly skilled job and based on skilled operators know-how and intuitive sense acquired through long-term experience rather than a theoretical and analytical approach. Facing with the global competition, the current trial-and-error practice becomes inadequate. In this paper, application of artificial neural network and fuzzy logic in a case-based system for initial process meter setting of injection molding is described. Artificial neural network was introduced in the case adaptation while fuzzy logic was employed in the case indexing and similarity analysis. A computer-aided system for the determination of initial process meter setting for injection molding based on the proposed techniques was developed and validated in a simulation environment. The preliminary validation tests of the system have indicated that the system can determine a set of initial process meters for injection molding quickly without relying on experienced molding personnel, from which good quality molded parts can be produced.     

A modal contrastive logic: The logic of ‘but’

In this paper we present a modal approach to contrastive logic, the logic of contrasts as these appear in natural language conjunctions such as but. We use a simple modal logic, which is an extension of the well-knownS5 logic, and base the contrastive operators proposed by Francez in [2] on the basic modalities that appear in this logic. We thus obtain a logic for contrastive operators that is more in accord with the tradition of intensional logic, and that, moreover — we argue — has some more natural properties. Particularly, attention is paid to nesting contrastive operators. We show that nestings of but give quite natural results, and indicate how nestings of other contrastive operators can be done adequately. Finally, we discuss the example of the Hangman's Paradox and some similarities (and differences) with default reasoning. But but us no buts, as they say.Also partially supported by Nijmegen University, Toernooiveld, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands.     

Proving total correctness of nondeterministic programs in infinitary logic

Summary It is shown how the weakest precondition approach to proving total correctness of nondeterministic programs can be formalized in infinitary logic. The weakest precondition technique is extended to hierarchically structured programs by adding a new primitive statement for operational abstraction, the nondeterministic assignment statement, to the guarded commands of Dijkstra. The infinitary logic L ₁ is shown to be strong enough to express the weakest preconditions for Dijkstra's guarded commands, but too weak for the extended guarded commands. Two possible solutions are considered: going to the essentially stronger infinitary logic L ₁₁ and restricting the power of the nondeterministic assignment statement in a way which allows the weakest preconditions to be expressed in L ₁.     

Distributivity in Łℵ0 and Other Sentential Logics

Certain distributivity results for ukasiewicz's infinite-valued logic ₀ are proved axiomatically (for the first time) with the help of the automated reasoning program OTTER. In addition, nondistributivity results are established for a wide variety of positive substructural logics by the use of logical matrices discovered with the automated model-finding programs MACE and MAGIC.