Cryptosporidium parvum in children with diarrhea in Mexico

This study was designed to determine if fentanyl altered MAC-awake (the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane associated with eye opening to verbal command) in 30 healthy, ASA I patients. During anaesthesia, no other anaesthetics or drugs were given with the exception of sevoflurane. After surgery, end-tidal anaesthetic concentration was maintained constant for at least 15 min. If patients failed to respond to command, the end-tidal concentration was decreased and again maintained constant for 15 min. The anaesthetic concentration midway between the value permitting the response and that just preventing the response was recorded as MAC-awake. Fentanyl was administered at predicted plasma concentrations of 1 and 2 ng mg-1 using a computer-controlled continuous infusion and plasma concentrations of fentanyl were measured at the time of MAC-awake measurements. MAC-awake of the control group in which fentanyl was not administered was mean 0.67 (SD 0.12)% or 0.36 (0.03) MAC, being significantly higher than that of the fentanyl 2-ng ml-1 group (0.57 (0.09)% or 0.30 (0.04) MAC). In the fentanyl 1-ng ml-1 group, MAC-awake (0.65 (0.10)% or 0.34 (0.05) MAC) did not differ from that in the control group. Logistic regression analysis showed that increasing plasma concentration of fentanyl and increasing age significantly reduced the MAC-awake of sevoflurane. Because the reduction was very small relative to the overall scatter of the MAC-awake, a low plasma concentration of fentanyl did not significantly reduce the MAC-awake of sevoflurane.     

Oral clonidine premedication reduces minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane for tracheal intubation in children

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane is a useful anesthetic for inhalational induction in children because of its low solubility in blood and relatively nonpungent odor. Clonidine has sedative and anxiolytic properties and reduces the requirement for inhalation agents. Nitrous oxide (N2O) also decreases the requirement of inhaled anesthetics, but the effect is variable. The minimum alveolar concentration for tracheal intubation (MAC(TI)) of sevoflurane was assessed with and without N2O and clonidine premedication. METHODS: Seventy-two patients, aged 3-11 yr, were assigned to one of six groups (n = 12 each). They received one of three preanesthetic medications (two groups for each premedication): placebo (control), 2 microg/kg oral clonidine or 4 microg/kg oral clonidine. In one group of each premedication, anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane in oxygen; in the other group, anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane in the presence of 60% N2O. Each concentration of sevoflurane at which tracheal intubation was attempted was predetermined according to Dixon's up-and-down method and held constant for at least 20 min before the trial RESULTS: The MAC(TI) of sevoflurane in the absence of N2O (mean +/- SEM) was 3.2 +/- 0.2%, 2.5 +/- 0.1%, and 1.9 +/- 0.2% in the control, 2-microg/kg clonidine, and 4-microg/kg clonidine groups, respectively. Nitrous oxide (60%) decreased the MAC(TI) of sevoflurane by 26%, 24%, and 27% in the control, 2-microg/kg clonidine, and 4-microg/kg clonidine groups. CONCLUSIONS: Oral clonidine premedication decreased the MAC(TI) of sevoflurane. Nitrous oxide also decreased the MAC(TI). The combination of clonidine and N2O lessened the MAC(TI) of sevoflurane more than did either drug alone.     

Effects of xenon on hemodynamic responses to skin incision in humans

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the hemodynamic suppressive effects of xenon in combination with sevoflurane at skin incision in patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: Forty patients were assigned randomly to receive one of the following four anesthetics: 1.3 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane, 0.7 MAC xenon with 0.6 MAC sevoflurane, 1 MAC xenon with 0.3 MAC sevoflurane, or 0.7 MAC nitrous oxide with 0.6 MAC sevoflurane (n = 10 each group). Systolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured before anesthesia, before incision, and approximately 1 min after incision. RESULTS: The changes in hemodynamic variables in response to incision were less with sevoflurane in combination with xenon and nitrous oxide than with sevoflurane alone. Changes in heart rate (in beats/min) were 19+/-11 (+/- SD) for sevoflurane alone, 11+/-6 for 0.7 MAC xenon-sevoflurane, 4+/-4 for 1 MAC xenon-sevoflurane, and 8+/-7 for nitrous oxide-sevoflurane. Changes in systolic blood pressure were 35+/-18 mmHg for sevoflurane alone, 18+/-8 mmHg for 0.7 MAC xenon-sevoflurane, 16+/-7 mmHg for 1 MAC xenon-sevoflurane, and 14+/-10 mmHg for nitrous oxide-sevoflurane. CONCLUSIONS: Xenon and nitrous oxide in combination with sevoflurane can reduce hemodynamic responses to skin incision compared with sevoflurane alone. One probable explanation may be that xenon has analgesic properties similar to those of nitrous oxide, although the exact mechanism is yet to be determined.     

Effect of isoflurane and sevoflurane on evoked potentials and EEG

Evoked potentials and EEG are used to monitor the central nervous system and the depth of anesthesia in anesthetized patients. In this study, we examined EEG, VEP, SEP and ABR at various concentrations of isoflurane or sevoflurane, and evaluated the influence of volatile agents and their usefulness for the monitoring of the depth of anesthesia. With increasing concentrations of isoflurane and sevoflurane, AE (frequency which account for 80% of total voltage) showed dose-related reduction and EEG showed a trend toward a slower wave and higher amplitude. With increasing concentrations of isoflurane and sevoflurane, P100 of VEP showed a significant dose-related reduction in its amplitude and increase in its latency. So we could not record P100 at the level of the anesthesia of 1.0 MAC with 66% N2O. N20 of SEP can be easily recorded at any depth of anesthesia. And the trend showed consistent dose-related changes in amplitude and latency. With increasing concentrations of isoflurane and sevoflurane, wave III and V of ABR increased significantly in latency, but the changes were very small. In conclusion, the effect of isoflurane and that of sevoflurane on evoked potentials and EEG are similar with each other and with other volatile agents. SEP is the most consistent and reliable factor to monitor the depth of anesthesia neurophysiologically.     

A comparison of the effects of propofol and sevoflurane on the systemic toxicity of intravenous bupivacaine in rats

We compared the effects of propofol and sevoflurane on bupivacaine-induced central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity in rats. Thirty-four male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with 70% N2O/30% O2 plus the 50% effective dose (ED50) of propofol (propofol group, n = 12); 70% N2O/30% O2 plus ED50 of sevoflurane (sevoflurane group, n = 11); or 70% N2O/30% O2 (control group, n = 11). Bupivacaine was infused at a constant rate of 2 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) while electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, and invasive arterial pressure were continuously monitored. The cumulative doses of bupivacaine that induced dysrhythmias, seizures, and 50% reduction of heart rate were larger in the propofol and sevoflurane groups than in the control group. The cumulative dose of bupivacaine that induced a 50% reduction in the mean arterial blood pressure was larger in the propofol group than in the sevoflurane and control groups. The margin of safety, assessed by the time between the onset of dysrhythmias and 50% reduction of mean arterial blood pressure, was wider in the propofol group than in the sevoflurane group. We conclude that propofol and sevoflurane attenuate bupivacaine-induced dysrhythmias and seizures and that propofol has a wider margin of safety than sevoflurane. IMPLICATIONS: In anesthetized patients, dysrhythmias may be the only warning sign of intravascular injection of bupivacaine. Because propofol has a wider margin of safety than sevoflurane, life-threatening cardiovascular depression may be prevented by stopping the injection of bupivacaine at the onset of dysrhythmias during propofol anesthesia.     

Effects of thiopental and sevoflurane on hemodynamics during anesthetic management of electroconvulsive therapy

The effect of thiopental and sevoflurane (1 MAC, 2 MAC) on hemodynamics was assessed in a randomized study involving 38 adult patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Blood pressure, heart rate and electrocardiogram (ECG) were monitored during the ECT procedure. After oxygenation, hypnosis was induced with a bolus injection of thiopenal (TPS) 4 mg.kg-1. Muscle relaxation was achieved by succinylcholine, 1 mg.kg-1 intravenously before ECT procedure. Ventilation was assisted using a face mask with 100% oxygen (TPS group), 1.7% sevoflurane (1 MAC group) or 3.4% sevoflurane (2 MAC group), plus 50% nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen. Thereafter, an electrical stimulus was administered. A total of 150 treatment sessions were evaluated. The rate pressure product increased in every group right after ECT, but the use of sevoflurane (2 MAC) significantly diminished the response compared with sevoflurane (1 MAC) and thiopental. In the sevoflurane (2 MAC) group, no ventricular arrhythmias were observed. In general, it seems that sevoflurane (2 MAC) is as effective as thiopental and sevoflurane (1 MAC) as an induction agent for ECT.     

Effect of high dosages of fentanyl and piritramide upon haemodynamics, coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption (author's transl)

High dosages of narcotic analgesics are frequently utilized as the sole anaesthetic agents for patients requiring open-heart surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of high dosages of fentanyl and piritramide upon the cardiovascular system. In anaesthetized dogs (N2O:O2=2:1; 0.5 vol% halothane) 0.03 mg/kg fentanyl (=8) and 1.5 mg/kg piritramide (n=8) respectively were given intravenously as a bolus. After the administration of fentanyl there was a slight decrease in blood pressure (10%). The hypotension was the result of a decrease in cardiac output (thermodilution technique) by 13% due to bradycardia. Total peripheral resistance and myocardial contractility remained unaffected. Similar effects were only found late after injection of piritramide, since there was an initial cardiovascular response to piritramide characterized by a marked fall in blood pressure (29%). The major cause of arterial hypotension was peripheral vasodilatation. Load data and the decrease in max dp/dt however indicated also a slight myocardial depression. The altered haemodynamics led to a decrease in myocardial oxygen consumption with both narcotics, which was nearly paralleled by a reduction in coronary blood flow. The narrowing of arteriovenous oxygen difference of the heart proved coronary dilatatory properties of fentanyl and especially of piritramide. This study indicated that high dosages of fentanyl have advantages in comparison to high dosages of piritramide. The clinical implications of the results are discussed.     

A phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized, comparative study evaluating the effect of sevoflurane versus isoflurane on the maintenance of anesthesia in adult ASA class I, II, and III inpatients

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of sevoflurane and isoflurane when used for the maintenance of anesthesia in adult ASA I, II, and III inpatients undergoing surgical procedures of at least 1 hour's duration. DESIGN: Phase III, randomized, open-label clinical trial. SETTING: 12 international surgical units. PATIENTS: 555 consenting inpatients undergoing surgeries of intermediate duration. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received either sevoflurane (n = 272) or isoflurane (n = 283) as their primary anesthetic drug, each administered in nitrous oxide (N2O) (up to 70%) and oxygen (O2) after an intravenous induction using thiopental and low-dose fentanyl. The concentration of volatile drug was kept relatively constant but some titration in response to clinical variable was permitted. Comparison of efficacy was based on observations made of the rapidly and ease of recovery from anesthesia and the frequency of untoward effects for the duration of anesthesia in the return of orientation. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse experiences, hematologic and non-laboratory testing, and physical assessments. In 25% of patients (all patients 171 both treatment groups at selected investigational sites), plasma inorganic fluoride concentrations were determined preoperatively, every 2 hours during maintenance, at the end of anesthesia, and at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Emergence, response to commands, orientation, and the first request for postoperative analgesia were all more rapid following discontinuation of sevoflurane than following discontinuation of isoflurane (sevoflurane, 11.0 +/- 0.6, 12.8 +/- 0.7, 17.2 +/- 0.9, 46.1 +/- 3.0 minutes, respectively, versus isoflurane, 16.4 +/- 0.6, 18.4 +/- 0.7, 24.7 +/- 0.9, 55.4 +/- 3.2 minutes). The incidence of adverse experiences was similar for sevoflurane and isoflurane patients. Forty-eight percent of patients on the sevoflurane group had no untoward effect versus 39% in the isoflurane group. Three patients who received sevoflurane had serum inorganic fluoride levels 50 microM/I. or greater though standard tests indicated no evidence of associated renal dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane anesthesia, as compared with isoflurane, may be advantageous in providing a smoother clinical course with a more rapid recover.     

Halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane reduce postischemic adhesion of neutrophils in the coronary system

BACKGROUND: Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) contribute to postischemic reperfusion damage in many organs and tissues, a prerequisite being adhesion of PMNs to vascular endothelial cells. Because adhesion processes involve orderly interactions of membrane proteins, it appeared possible that "membrane effects" of volatile anesthetics could interfere. We investigated the effects of halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane on postischemic adhesion of human PMNs in the intact coronary system of isolated perfused guinea pig hearts. METHODS: The hearts (n = 7-10 per group) were perfused in the "Langendorff" mode under conditions of constant flow (5 ml/min) using modified Krebs-Henseleit buffer equilibrated with 94.4% oxygen and 5.6% carbon dioxide. Global myocardial ischemia was induced by interrupting perfusion for 15 min. In the second minute of reperfusion (5 ml/min), a bolus dose of 6 x 10(5) PMNs was injected into the coronary system. The number of cells reemerging in the coronary effluent was expressed as a percentage of the total number of applied PMNs. Halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane, each at 1 and 2 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC), were vaporized in the gas mixture and applied from 14 min before ischemia until the end of the experiment. RESULTS: Under nonischemic conditions, 24.7 +/- 1.3% of the injected neutrophils did not reemerge from the perfused coronary system. Subjecting the hearts to global ischemia augmented retention (36.4 +/- 2.8%, P < .05). Application of halothane reduced adhesion of neutrophils to 22.6 +/- 2.1% and 24.2 +/- 1.8% at 1 and 2 MAC, respectively (P < .05). Exposure to 1 and 2 MAC isoflurane was similarly effective, whereas basal adhesion was not significantly influenced. Sevoflurane-treated hearts (1 and 2 MAC) also showed decreased adhesion of PMNs (23 +/- 2.3% and 24.8 +/- 1.8%, respectively; P < .05) and an identical reduction resulted when sevoflurane (1 MAC) was applied only with the onset of reperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Although the mechanism of action of volatile anesthetics remains unclear in these preliminary studies, their inhibitory effect on ischemia-induced adhesion of PMNs may be beneficial for the heart during general anesthesia.     

Effects of sevoflurane or halothane on contractile responses of isolated canine basilar artery

Although volatile anesthetic is known as a cerebral vasodilator, its mechanism is not clear. The purpose of this study was to investigate effects of sevoflurane or halothane on contractions induced by high K+ and serotonin in the isolated canine basilar artery. Cylindrical segments of canine basilar artery were placed in Krebs solution oxygenated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 at 37 degrees C. They were then constricted with cumulative administration of 10 to 60 mM KCl, or with 10(-9) to 10(-6) M serotonin and exposed to either sevoflurane or halothane at concentration of 1.0 and 2.0 MAC. Halothane and sevoflurane at concentration of 1.0 and 2.0 MAC decreased contractile responses evoked by KCl to a similar degree. The attenuation by either of the two anesthetics at concentration of 2.0 MAC were equivalent to the inhibitions by diltiazem 2 x 10(-7) M. Contractile responses to serotonin above 3 x 10(-7) M were depressed by halothane 1.0 MAC, but not by sevoflurane 1.0 MAC. Sevoflurane and halothane at concentration of 2.0 MAC decreased contractile responses evoked by serotonin at concentrations above 3 x 10(-8) M and 10(-8) M. Removal of the endothelium did not alter the response of the basilar artery contracted by serotonin to either anesthetic. These findings suggest that sevoflurane and halothane depress the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels due to decreases of contractile responses to high K+. Our results also demonstrate that sevoflurane is a less potent vasodilator of the basilar artery contracted by serotonin than halothane.     

Evidence for regulation of the NADH peroxidase gene (npr) from Enterococcus faecalis by OxyR

To evaluate residual effects of inhalational anesthetics after reversal of neuromuscular blocking agent, neuromuscular function was monitored after halothane or sevoflurane anesthesia in thirty-seven patients (ASA physical status I or II) for elective surgery after obtaining informed consent. Electromyograph of the adductor pollicis muscle in response to train of four (TOF) stimulation was monitored throughout the study. The first twitch of TOF (T1; % of its control) and the ratio of the fourth twitch to the first twitch of TOF (T4/T1; TR) were recorded at 0, 2, 5, 10, and 15 min after reversal. The patients were divided into five groups; 1) the fentanyl group (n = 7) received fentanyl/N2O; 2) in the halothane stop group (n = 6), halothane was discontinued at least fifteen minutes before neostigmine administration; 3) in the halothane stable group (n = 7), 0.7% halothane was maintained until fifteen minutes after neostigmine; 4) in the sevoflurane stop group (n = 12), sevoflurane was discontinued fifteen minutes before the reversal; 5) in the sevoflurane stable group (n = 5), 3% sevoflurane was maintained until fifteen minutes after the reversal. Anesthesia was induced by thiopental 4 mg.kg-1 and suxamethonium 1 mg.kg-1 and the patients were intubated. After initial dose of vecuronium 0.1 mg.kg-1, the additional dose of 0.02 mg.kg-1 was administered to maintain T1 under 10% of the control value. At the end of the surgery atropine 0.015 mg.kg-1 and neostigmine 0.04 mg.kg-1 were administered to reverse vecuronium when T1 had recovered to 25% of its control. Halothane groups did not differ from fentanyl group. Recovery of T1 at 15 min was suppressed after discontinuation of sevoflurane (86.0 +/- 8.2%) in comparison with fentanyl (97.0 +/- 8.3%). Both T1 (75.4 +/- 12.2%) and TR (68.0 +/- 12.6%) at 15 min after the reversal during 3% sevoflurane inhalation were below those of the stable group. We conclude that the residual sevofulrane after discontinuation of inhalation may impair the neuromuscular transmission after the reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Neuromuscular function should be monitored after the end of anesthesia even though the patient is fully awake.     

The effects of sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane on hemodynamic responses during an inhaled induction of anesthesia via a mask in humans

A rapid increase in isoflurane or desflurane concentration induces tachycardia and hypertension and increases-plasma catecholamine concentration. Little information is available as to whether sevoflurane, halothane, and enflurane induce similar responses during anesthesia induction via mask. Fifty ASA physical status I patients, aged 20-40 yr, and scheduled for elective minor surgery, received one of four volatile anesthetics: sevoflurane, isoflurane, halothane, or enflurane. Anesthesia was induced with thiamylal, followed by inhalation of 0.9 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) of the anesthetic in 100% oxygen via mask. The inspired concentration of anesthetic was increased by 0.9 MAC every 5 min to a maximum of 2.7 MAC. Heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were measured before and every minute for 15 min during anesthetic inhalation. In the sevoflurane and isoflurane groups, venous blood samples were drawn to determine the concentrations of plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine 3 min after each increase in anesthetic concentration. Sustained increments in HR were observed after increases in inspired isoflurane concentration to 1.8 MAC and 2.7 MAC (peak changes of 15 +/- 3 and 17 +/- 3 bpm, respectively). Isoflurane also increased SBP transiently after the inspired concentration was increased to 2.7 MAC (peak change of 10 +/- 4 mm Hg). Enflurane increased HR after the inspired concentration was increased to 2.7 MAC (peak change of 9 +/- 2 bpm). In contrast, changes in sevoflurane and halothane concentrations did not induce hyperdynamic responses. Plasma norepinephrine concentration in the isoflurane group was significantly higher than that in the sevoflurane group during 2.7 MAC (P = 0.022). We propose that there is a direct relationship between airway irritation of the anesthetic and immediate cardiovascular change during an inhaled induction of anesthesia.     

Renal function in patients during and after hypotensive anesthesia with sevoflurane

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate renal function during and after hypotensive anesthesia with sevoflurane compared with isoflurane in the clinical setting. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective study. SETTING: Inpatient surgery at Rosai Hospital. PATIENTS: 26 ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for orthopedic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received isoflurane, nitrous oxide (N2O), and fentanyl (Group I = isoflurane group; n = 13) or sevoflurane, N2O, and fentanyl (Group S = sevoflurane group; n = 13). Controlled hypotension was induced with either isoflurane or sevoflurane to maintain mean arterial pressure at 60 mmHg for 120 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements included serum inorganic fluoride (previously speculated to influence renal function), creatinine clearance (CCr; to assess renal glomerular function), urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG; to assess renal tubular function), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum creatinine (as clinical renal function indices). Serum fluoride, CCr, and NAG were measured before hypotension, 60 minutes, and 120 minutes after the start of hypotension, 30 minutes after recovery of normotension, and on the first postoperative day. BUN and serum creatinine were measured preoperatively and on the third and seventh postoperative days. Minimum alveolar concentration times hour was 3.6 +/- 1.8 in Group I and 4.0 +/- 0.7 in Group S. In both groups, BUN and serum creatinine did not change, and CCr significantly decreased after the start of hypotension. In Group I, serum fluoride and NAG did not change. In Group S, serum fluoride significantly increased after the start of hypotension compared with prehypotension values and compared with Group I values. In addition, NAG significantly increased at 120 minutes after the start of hypotension and at 30 minutes after recovery of normotension, but returned to prehypotension values on the first postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: Two hours of hypotensive anesthesia with sevoflurane under 5 L/min total gas flow in patients having no preoperative renal dysfunction transiently increased NAG, which is consistent with a temporary, reversible disturbance of renal tubular function.     

Generalised mitochondrial cytopathy is an absolute contraindication to orthotopic liver transplant in childhood

OBJECTIVE: To compare mask anesthesia induction and recovery characteristics between 2 inhalant anesthetic agents: isoflurane and sevoflurane. ANIMALS: 16 clinically normal, young adult Beagles. PROCEDURE: Using a cross-over design, dogs were randomly selected to receive sevoflurane or isoflurane via a face mask and a circle anesthetic system. Vaporizer setting concentrations were increased in stepwise, equal minimum alveolar concentrations (MAC) for each anesthetic until the vaporizer setting of 2.6% for isoflurane or 4.8% for sevoflurane (2 MAC) was reached. Concentration was kept constant until the dog had a negative tail clamp response and was intubated. End-tidal concentration was maintained at 1.8 to 2.0% or 3.3 to 3.8% for isoflurane or sevoflurane, respectively (1.4 to 1.6 MAC) for 30 minutes. Dogs were allowed to recover with only tail clamp stimulation until a positive response was obtained. Extubation was performed when a spontaneous swallow reflex was observed. Dogs were allowed to achieve sternal recumbency and stand unassisted without further stimulation. RESULTS: Sevoflurane induction resulted in shorter time to loss of palpebral reflex, negative tail clamp response, and time to tracheal intubation, and was of better quality than isoflurane induction. Both anesthetics were associated with rapid and smooth recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane mask induction is faster and of better quality, compared with isoflurane, in adult dogs. Recovery time and quality are comparable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: On the basis of these results, sevoflurane is a suitable inhalant anesthetic for mask induction and recovery in adult dogs and appears to have some advantages over isoflurane, including faster and smoother mask induction.     

Clinical sevoflurane metabolism and disposition. I. Sevoflurane and metabolite pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has low blood and tissue solubility and is metabolized to free fluoride and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP). Although sevoflurane uptake and distribution and fluoride formation have been described, the pharmacokinetics of HFIP formation and elimination are incompletely understood. This investigation comprehensively characterized the simultaneous disposition of sevoflurane, fluoride, and HFIP. METHODS: Ten patients within 30% of ideal body weight who provided institutional review board-approved informed consent received sevoflurane (2.7% end-tidal, 1.3 MAC) in oxygen for 3 h after propofol induction, after which anesthesia was maintained with propofol, fentanyl, and nitrous oxide. Sevoflurane and unconjugated and total HFIP concentrations in blood were determined during anesthesia and for 8 h thereafter. Plasma and urine fluoride and total HFIP concentrations were measured during and through 96 h after anesthetic administration. Fluoride and HFIP were quantitated using an ion-selective electrode and by gas chromatography, respectively. RESULTS: The total sevoflurane dose, calculated from the pulmonary uptake rate, was 88.8 +/- 9.1 mmol. Sevoflurane was rapidly metabolized to the primary metabolites fluoride and HFIP, which were eliminated in urine. HFIP circulated in blood primarily as a glucuronide conjugate, with unconjugated HFIP < or = 15% of total HFIP concentrations. In blood, peak unconjugated HFIP concentrations were less than 1% of peak sevoflurane concentrations. Apparent renal fluoride and HFIP clearances (mean +/- SE) were 51.8 +/- 4.5 and 52.6 +/- 6.1 ml/min, and apparent elimination half-lives were 21.4 +/- 2.8 and 20.1 +/- 2.6 h, respectively. Renal HFIP and net fluoride excretion were 4,300 +/- 540 and 3,300 +/- 540 mumol. Compared with the estimated sevoflurane uptake, 4.9 +/- 0.5% of the dose taken up was eliminated in the urine as HFIP. For fluoride, 3.7 +/- 0.4% of the sevoflurane dose taken up was eliminated in the urine, which, because a portion of fluoride is sequestered in bone, corresponded to approximately 5.6% of the sevoflurane dose metabolized to fluoride. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane was rapidly metabolized to fluoride and HFIP, which was rapidly glucuronidated and eliminated in the urine. The overall extent of sevoflurane metabolism was approximately 5%.     

Synergistic antinociceptive interaction between sevoflurane and intrathecal fentanyl in dogs

This study determined the nature of the antinociceptive interaction between sevoflurane and intrathecal fentanyl on somatosympathetic reflexes in anaesthetized dogs. Afferent A delta- and C-fibre-mediated somatosympathetic reflexes, evoked by supramaximal electrical stimulation of tibial nerves, were recorded from renal sympathetic nerves. The effect of fentanyl alone, administered intrathecally (i.t.) in incremental doses from 2 to 64 micrograms, was compared with the effect of the same doses during the administration of 1.5% sevoflurane. The mean ED50s for the depressant effect of fentanyl (i.t.) on A delta and C reflexes were 35.6 micrograms and 14.2 micrograms while 1.5% sevoflurane, when administered alone, depressed them by 15.5% (P < 0.05) and 27.5% (P < 0.01) respectively. During the administration of 1.5% sevoflurane, the mean ED50s of fentanyl (i.t.) for the depression of A delta and C reflexes were reduced by 76% and 75%, to 8.5 micrograms and 3.5 micrograms respectively. The combined antinociceptive effects of sevoflurane and intrathecal fentanyl were not additive but exhibited a high degree of synergistic interaction.     

Reduction by fentanyl of the Cp50 values of propofol and hemodynamic responses to various noxious stimuli

BACKGROUND: Propofol and fentanyl infusion rates should be varied according to the patient's responsiveness to stimulation to maintain satisfactory anesthetic and operative conditions. However, somatic and autonomic responses to various noxious stimuli have not been investigated systematically for intravenous propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. METHODS: Propofol and fentanyl were administered via computer-assisted continuous infusion to provide stable concentrations and to allow equilibration between plasma-blood and effect-site concentrations. The propofol concentrations needed to suppress eye opening to verbal command and motor responses after 50-Hz electric tetanic stimulation, laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation, and skin incision in 50% or 95% of patients (Cp50 and Cp95) were determined at fentanyl concentrations of 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 ng/ml in 133 patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery. The ability of propofol with fentanyl to suppress hemodynamic reactions in response to various noxious stimuli also was evaluated by measuring arterial blood pressure and heart rate before and after stimulation. RESULTS: The various Cp50 values for propofol alone (no fentanyl) for the various stimuli increased in the following order: Cp50loss of consciousness, 4.4 microg/ml (range, 3.8-5.0); Cp50tetanus, 9.3 microg/ml (range, 8.3-10.4); Cp50laryngoscopy, 9.8 microg/ml (range, 8.9-10.8); Cp50skin incision, 10.0 microg/ml (range, 8.1-12.2); and Cp50intubation, 17.4 microg/ml (range, 15.1-20.1; 95% confidence interval). The reduction of Cp50loss of consciousness, with fentanyl was minimal; 11% at 1 ng/ml of fentanyl and 17% at 3 ng/ml of fentanyl. A plasma fentanyl concentration of 1 ng/ml (3 ng/ml) resulted in a 31-34% (50-55%) reduction of the propofol Cp50s for tetanus, laryngoscopy, intubation, and skin incision. Propofol alone depresses prestimulation blood pressure but had no influence on the magnitude blood pressure or heart rate increase to stimulation. Propofol used with fentanyl attenuated the systolic blood pressure increases to various noxious stimuli in a dose-dependent fashion. CONCLUSIONS: The authors successfully defined the propofol concentration required for various stimuli. Tracheal intubation was the strongest stimulus. The absence of somatic reactions for propofol does not guarantee hemodynamic stability without fentanyl. Propofol with fentanyl was able to suppress motor and hemodynamic reactions to various noxious stimuli.     

Comparison of the haemodynamic actions of desflurane/N2O and isoflurane/N2O anaesthesia in vascular surgical patients

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare heart rate and arterial blood pressure response to desflurane/N2O vs isoflurane/N2O anaesthesia in a randomized clinical trial performed in patients before vascular surgery. METHODS: To evaluate associated changes in the autonomic nervous system with maintenance of anaesthesia, we used power spectral analysis (PSA) of heart rate and blood pressure and measured plasma catecholamine concentrations. Twenty-five patients whose trachea had been intubated after propofol induction were given either desflurane or isoflurane at 1 and 1.5 MAC in N2O (60%) in a random manner. RESULTS: At an anaesthetic depth of up to 1.5 MAC, arterial blood pressure, indices of sympathetic activity derived from PSA, decreased with both anaesthetics, while heart rate and plasma catecholamine concentrations did not significantly change. Plasma renin activity significantly increased at 1.5 MAC anaesthesia in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that sympathetic hyperactivity previously reported during desflurane anaesthesia in healthy volunteers is not frequent in clinical practice in elderly vascular surgical patients under desflurane/N2O anaesthesia, since it occurs at an anaesthetic depth which cannot be reached in these patients because of the lowering arterial blood pressure effects of desflurane, which are similar to those of isoflurane.     

Isoflurane and pentobarbital reduce the frequency of transient ischemic depolarizations during focal ischemia in rats

Repetitive transient ischemic depolarizations (IDs) during focal cerebral ischemia are thought to contribute to ischemic damage. Isoflurane and pentobarbital reduce injury (versus the nonanesthetized state) after focal cerebral ischemia. The mechanism by which these drugs reduce injury is not known. This protective effect might be mediated by a reduction in the number of IDs. We measured the frequency of IDs during focal cerebral ischemia in animals anesthetized with isoflurane or pentobarbital and compared it with that in N2O/fentanyl anesthetized animals and in animals in which the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK801 (dizocilpine) was given. Focal cerebral ischemia was induced by the occlusion of the middle cerebral artery for a period of 2 h. Cortical infarct volumes were determined after 3 h of reperfusion by image analysis of 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium-stained coronal brain sections. The infarct volume was significantly greater in the N2O/fentanyl group than in the other three groups. Infarct volumes in the isoflurane, pentobarbital, and MK801 groups were similar. The frequency of IDs was significantly greater in the N2O/fentanyl group than in the other three groups, and was the least in the MK801 group. There was a direct correlation between the number of IDs and the volume of tissue injury. The data indicate that the protective effect of isoflurane and pentobarbital might, in part, be determined by their ability to reduce IDs during focal ischemia. However, the observation that the infarct volume was similar in the MK801, isoflurane, and pentobarbital groups, despite a greater frequency of IDs in the latter two groups, suggests that mechanisms other than a simple reduction in the number of IDs probably also play a role in anesthetic-mediated cerebral protection. Implications: Transient ischemic depolarizations during focal ischemia contribute to brain injury. Both isoflurane and pentobarbital reduced the frequency of these depolarizations. Isoflurane- and pentobarbital-mediated reduction in the frequency of depolarizations might, in part, mediate the previously documented neuroprotective effect of these drugs.     

Neuromuscular blockade with vecuronium and its reversal with edrophonium during total intravenous anesthesia, neuroleptanalgesia and sevoflurane anesthesia

The neuromuscular blocking effect of vecuronium and its reversibility ith edrophonium were studied under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and compared with those under NLA or sevoflurane anesthesia (SA) in 30 surgical patients. The degree of neuromuscular blockade was evaluated by acceleration of thumb adduction in response to supramaximal stimulation of the ulnar nerve using Accelograph (Biometer). TIVA was induced with droperidol 0.25 mg.kg-1, fentanyl 2-4 micrograms.kg-1 and ketamine 2 mg.kg-1, and maintained with continuous infusion of ketamine 2 mg.kg-1.h-1 with 30-35% O2 in air. NLA was induced with droperidol 0.25 mg.kg-1 and fentanyl 5-10 micrograms.kg-1 and maintained with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen. SA was induced with thiamylal 5 mg.kg-1 i.v. and maintained with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen supplemented with sevoflurane (1 MAC). A single bolus intravenous injection of vecuronium 0.1 mg.kg-1 was used for paralysis and reversed with edrophonium 0.75 mg.kg-1 followed by atropine 0.015 mg.kg-1 when the TOF ratio returned to 25%. The times required from administration of vecuronium to completion of maximal block with TIVA, NLA and SA were 196.5 +/- 52.2 sec, 182.5 +/- 47.6 sec and 166.0 +/- 69.0 sec, respectively. There was no significant difference among them. The times from completion of maximal block to 25% recovery of the twitch height in TIVA and NLA were 39.5 +/- 11.0 min and 37.4 +/- 5.8 min without significant difference. Those values, however, were significantly shorter than 64.5 +/- 35.2 min of SA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)