Genotype and growing environment influence chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seed composition

BACKGROUND: As a first step towards genetic improvement of seed quality in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), seven desi and nine kabuli varieties were grown at multiple sites to assess the affect of environment on seed yield, weight and selected seed constituents. The sites were chosen to represent a range of environments in chickpea production areas of the Canadian prairies. RESULTS: Genotype × environment interaction effects on starch, amylose and protein (desi only) concentrations and seed yield were significant, suggesting that the varieties did not perform consistently relative to each other in the different environments. Starch concentration was negatively correlated (r_kabuli = ?0.25, P < 0.05; r_desi = ?0.16, P < 0.05) with protein concentration in both chickpea market classes. However, repeatability estimates of starch, amylose and protein concentrations were low and inconsistent across chickpea market classes, possibly owing to complex biosynthetic pathways for these constituents. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that testing for seed constituent traits over a range of environments will be required to improve seed quality in individual chickpea varieties. The best selection strategies for seed constituent improvement in chickpea will be influenced by genotype and genotype × environment interaction for these traits. The negative relationship between seed constituents and yield indicates that selection for chickpea cultivars with desired seed composition may require compromise and indirect selection. Copyright © 2009 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Biochemistry and technology of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds

Chickpea is an important source of proteins, carbohydrates, B-group vitamins, and certain minerals, particularly to the populations of developing nations. India contributes over 75% of the chickpea production in the world where it is mostly consumed as dhal, whole seeds, and several types of traditional, fermented, deep fried, sweetened, and puffed products. In this review, the world production and distribution, genetic background, biochemical and nutritional quality, and developments in storage and processing technology of chickpea are discussed. Future research needs, to improve the utilization of chickpea as human food, are addressed.     

Protein quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) protein hydrolysates

Chickpea protein isolate (CPI) was used as the starting material in the production of chickpea protein hydrolysates (CPHs). To obtain a highly extensive hydrolysate with a degree of hydrolysis higher than 50%, a sequential utilisation of endoprotease (Alcalase) and exoprotease (Flavourzyme) was necessary. Molecular weight patterns of CPHs were determined by gel filtration chromatography. As a result of the enzymatic activity, differences in the chromatographic pattern of CPHs were observed. Although significant (P⩽0.05) decreases of Phe and Arg were observed after hydrolysis, adequate amounts of essential amino acids in relation to the reference pattern of FAO (FAO/WHO/ONU, 1985. Energy and requirements. Technical report series No. 724. Geneva) were found. In vitro protein digestibility of CPHs (95%) were similar to that of the starting material (CPI), and TIA was not detected in any case. A high increase of solubility in CPHs, with respect to CPI, was observed, one CPH being totally soluble over a wide pH range (2–10) when the enzymes were added sequentially. Due to their high protein quality and solubility, CPHs might be considered as potential ingredients in the food industry.     

Extrusion and iron bioavailability in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

The effect of extrusion cooking (14% moisture and 130°C processing temperature) and of home-cooking on chickpea iron bioavailability was studied by the hemoglobin regeneration method in anemic rats. The iron pool was calculated from hemoglobin concentration and animal weight, and iron bioavailability from the relationship between iron pool gain (Δ pool) and mg of ingested iron. Iron bioavailability relative to ferrous sulfate was calculated by the following equation: Y=63.989 e^−0.0458X [Y= % absorbed; X=ingested Fe (mg)] on the basis of the results of control groups. The results showed that there was no significant difference between groups (extruded and cooked) in terms of mean percentage of iron bioavailability relative to Fe₂SO₄. We conclude that chickpea is a good source of iron and extrusion cooking is a process comparable to home-cooking in terms of iron bioavailability.     

Milling and physicochemical properties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties

BACKGROUND: Physical characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds such as grain size, weight and hull content are important from a milling and marketing point of view. Chemical characteristics provide the information on nutritional status of grains. Chickpea of Desi (cv. A1) and Kabuli (cv. L550) cultivars were analyzed for their physicochemical, milling and milled flour quality characteristics. RESULTS: Between dry and wet milling, higher yield of dhal was obtained from wet milling, which was found to be true in both cultivars. An extra yield of 2–4% was obtained in wet milling. Between the cultivars, Desi was found to be the higher dhal‐yielding cultivar in both dry and wet milling methods. Fat, ash and protein contents were found to be higher in Kabuli than in Desi and the values were respectively 5.3%, 3.5% and 24.9% for Kabuli and 4.3%, 2.2% and 22.6% for Desi. CONCLUSION: The chickpea cultivars Desi and Kabuli vary significantly in their physical properties such as seed color, size, 100‐seed weight and 100‐seed volume. Between the dry and wet milling, a higher yield (2–4%) of dhal was obtained from wet milling. Between the cultivars, electronic nose analysis of chickpea flour indicated the possibility of differentiating the variations associated with varietal difference and milling. The gel electrophoresis pattern of chickpea showed as many as 15 protein bands in flours from both the cultivars, either in phosphate or SDS buffer. The Rapid Visco Analyzer profile did not show a significant difference between the two cultivars. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry     

Protein isolates from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): chemical composition,functional properties and protein characterization

Two types of protein isolates were prepared from ground chickpea seeds by alkaline extraction, with (Isolate-B) and without (Isolate-A) sodium sulphite, and acid precipitation of the proteins at the isoelectric point (pI 4.3). The percentage of protein recovered from chickpea flour in the preparation of Isolates-A and B were 65.9 and 62.1%, respectively. Chemical composition, main functional properties and protein composition of chickpea flour and protein isolates were determined. Isolates-A and B contained 78 and 88.1% of protein, respectively, and had a balanced content of essential amino acids, with respect to the FAO pattern. The in vitro protein digestibility ranged between 95.6 and 96.1%. Isolate-A showed a partial dissociation of the 11S protein because of the high pH used for the protein extraction, and this probably explains the differences observed in the functional characteristics of both isolates.     

Hypocholesterolaemic and antioxidant activities of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) protein hydrolysates

BACKGROUND: Some dietary proteins possess biological properties which make them potential ingredients of functional or health‐promoting foods. Many of these properties are attributed to bioactive peptides that can be released by controlled hydrolysis using exogenous proteases. The aim of this work was to test the improvement of hypocholesterolaemic and antioxidant activities of chickpea protein isolate by means of hydrolysis with alcalase and flavourzyme. RESULTS: All hydrolysates tested exhibited better hypocholesterolaemic activity when compared with chickpea protein isolate. The highest cholesterol micellar solubility inhibition (50%) was found after 60 min of treatment with alcalase followed by 30 min of hydrolysis with flavourzyme. To test antioxidant activity of chickpea proteins three methods were used: β‐carotene bleaching method, reducing power and 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical‐scavenging effect since antioxidant activity of protein hydrolysates may not be attributed to a single mechanism. Chickpea hydrolysates showed better antioxidant activity in all assays, especially reducing power and DPPH scavenging effect than chickpea protein isolate. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed the good potential of chickpea protein hydrolysates as bioactive ingredients. The highest bioactive properties could be obtained by selecting the type of proteases and the hydrolysis time. Copyright © 2012 Society of Chemical Industry     

Polar lipids of defatted chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) flour and protein isolates

Polar lipid composition of defatted chickpea flour and protein isolates was studied. The main compounds were phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylethanolamine. Other compounds, in lower amounts, were sterol glucosides, esterified sterol glucosides and digalactosyldiglycerides. Palmitic, oleic and linoleic acid were the main fatty acids in polar lipids. A reduction in the content of phosphatidylinositol and sterol glucosides in the protein isolates with respect to the defatted flour was observed, indicating that these compounds are more sensitive to the chemical treatment of the protein isolates. However, unsaturated fatty acids and unsaturated sterols content decreased in the protein isolates probably undergoing oxidative degradation.     

Empirical and diffusion models to describe water transport into chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

To describe water transport in a porous media, a mathematical model is usually used. Among the models available in the literature, empirical and diffusive ones can be cited. In this paper, Page and diffusion models are used to describe drying and soaking of chickpea. In addition, new empirical equation is proposed to describe the mentioned processes. According to the results, the two empirical models well describe drying and soaking, but the proposed one gives the best statistical indicators. The use of the diffusion model to describe the drying process makes it possible to determine the effective diffusivities (7.13 × 10^?11, 10.39 × 10^?11 and 13.78 × 10^?11 m² s^?1 for the drying air at 40, 50 and 60 °C, respectively) and also the activation energy associated with the process (27.9 kJ mol^?1).     

Amino acid composition of storage proteins of a promising chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) cultivar

The amino acid compositions of flours made from the cotyledons and from the whole seeds of a disease-resistant, stable and high-yielding cultivar of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L) cv H75–35, known locally as Gaurav, have been analysed. These, together with similar analyses of the albumin, globulin, legumin and vicilin protein fractions, have been compared with those of other legumes. Seed protein content was 19·8 % with globulin constituting 62·4 % of the total seed protein. The ratios of albumin to globulin and legumin to vicilin were 1:4 and 6:1, respectively. The proportion of basic amino acids in the albumin was low whereas the reverse was true in the globulin. The legumin fraction seems to be superior in terms of total essential amino acids to those from other sources. Sulphur amino acids were the most limiting, followed by tryptophan or threonine depending on the fraction. However, the ratio of methionine to cystine was high (2·76:1). The extent of the sulphur amino acid deficiency was assessed, and possible approaches for its improvement are outlined.     

Evaluation of rapid methods for the estimation of protein in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Protein content in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) was determined by the following rapid procedures: (a) colorimetric estimation of ammonia with phenol-hypochlorite reagents using the Technicon auto-analyzer (TAA) method, (b) dye-binding capacity (DBC) method using acid orange-12 dye, and (c) modified biuret methods of Pinckney (B1) and Johnson and Craney (B2). Results obtained with the above procedures were compared statistically with the standard microKjeldahl (MKJ) procedure. Correlation of MKJ protein values with TAA, DBC, B1 and B2 methods were 0.99, 0.98, 0.96 and 0.95, respectively. Standard errors of estimation obtained by methods B1 (0.99) and B2 (0.95) were high when compared to the TAA (0.55) and DBC (0.69) methods. Possible interference of seed-coat pigments, effect of flour particle size, and time of shaking on protein estimation by the DBC and B1 methods were also studied. Implications of these results are discussed with reference to adapting any of these rapid methods as a routine screening procedure for the estimation of protein in large numbers of chickpea samples in a breeding programme.     

Effect of ripening stage and technological treatments on the lipid composition,lipase and lipoxygenase activities of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Lipid composition, lipase and lipoxygenase activities of chickpea seeds were determined in the green (Malana) and fully ripe (dry) chickpea seeds for Giza 1 and Giza 2 cultivars before and after some technological treatments (decortication, cooking and parching). Ripening resulted in marked increase in the content of triglycerides, phosphatidyl choline and phosphatidyl ethanolamine as major components of chickpea lipids. Also, there was a marked rise in lipase and lipoxygenase activities with slight changes in fatty acid composition of chickpea lipids. Minor changes in lipid composition owing to the decortication process applied to the two tested chickpea cultivars (Giza 1 and 2) were also noticed. Cooking and parching caused only slight changes in lipid classes and fatty acids composition, but yielded a significant increase in peroxide value of chickpea lipids. There was a marked drop in lipoxygenase activity with complete inhibition of lipase activity due to cooking and parching.     

Chemical composition,functional properties and microstructural characteristics of three kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as affected by different cooking methods

Chickpea is an important food legume and is a major ingredient in many human diets. Chemical composition, physical parameters, functional properties and microstructural characteristics of three kabuli chickpea cultivars and the effects of three cooking methods were investigated. Carbohydrate and protein were two major components in all seeds. Cooking increased fibre, total carbohydrate and total and resistant starch contents, but decreased ash content. Protein and oil levels of the cooked samples either decreased or did not change significantly. Seed weight and density decreased with cooking. Hydration and swelling capacities as well as water absorption and holding capacities of cooked chickpeas were higher than raw samples, with the largest increases in the pressure‐cooked seeds. Seed weights were highly correlated with hydration (r = 0.89) and swelling (r = 0.76) rates. Emulsifying activity, emulsifying stability and foaming capacity of cooked chickpea flours decreased, while foaming stability increased. Chickpea flours had pronounced morphological changes after cooking.     

Subunit,amino acid composition and in vitro digestibility of protein isolates from Chinese kabuli and desi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars

The subunit, amino acid composition and in vitro digestibility of the two protein isolates (GCPI and ZCPI) from one kabuli and one desi chickpea cultivars, grown extensively in Xinjiang Autonomous Region of China, were investigated and compared with those of soy protein isolate (SPI). SDS–PAGE showed that GCPI and ZCPI had almost the same band components under the reduced and unreduced conditions, with only minor difference in relative quantity for some bands, but different from that of SPI. The sulphur-containing amino acids were the first limiting amino acids for all three protein isolates of GCPI (2.11 g/100 g), ZCPI (2.20 g/100 g) and SPI (1.99 g/100 g). Amino acid score of the three protein isolates could reach the FAO/WHO requirement (1990) for the essential amino acids for preschool children. The order of in vitro digestibility was GCPI (87.47%) > ZCPI (80.82%) > SPI (71.04%). Our results indicated that, compared with soybean protein isolate, Chinese kabuli and desi chickpea protein isolates had higher digestibility value, and chickpea protein, especially for kabuli protein, could be utilized as a good source of protein for human nutrition.     

Effect of cooking on the composition of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)

The effect of cooking on levels of nutrients and anti-nutritional factors in beans and chickpeas was investigated. Significant (p < 0.05) variation existed among the beans and chickpeas with respect to their crude protein, starch, soluble dietary fiber (SDF), insoluble dietary fiber (IDF), total dietary fiber (TDF), resistant starch (RS), trypsin inhibitor activity (TIA), mineral, phytic acid, tannin, sucrose and oligosaccharide (raffinose, stachyose and verbascose) contents. Cooking beans and chickpeas in water significantly increased protein, starch, SDF, IDF, TDF, Mn and P contents (on a dry weight basis), whereas reduced ash, K, Mg, TIA, tannin, sucrose and oligosaccharide contents were observed. Colored beans (black, cranberry, dark red kidney, pinto and small red bean) contained tannins, whereas little tannin in white-colored beans (great northern and white pea bean) and chickpeas (Desi and Kabuli type) was detected.     

Composition and properties of starches from Virginia‐grown kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars

Composition and properties of seeds and starches from five Virginia‐grown kabuli chickpea cultivars were investigated. The seeds had the average weight of 4.48 g per 10 g and volume of 641.2 mm³, and were rich in carbohydrate with starch as a principal constituent (59.2–70.9%). Resistant starch accounted for 7.7–10.4% of the total starch content. The composition and properties of the starches among the five cultivars were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05). All starches had a C‐type crystalline structure. The degree of crystallinity ranged from 21.1% to 27.4%, gelatinisation temperature from 7.97 to 11.2 °C and gelatinisation enthalpies from 2.18 to 3.76 J g^?1, and water absorption capacities from 90.7% to 117.5%. Different shapes and granule sizes were observed. Molecular weight of amylopectin was in the range of 6.35 × 10⁸–11.6 × 10⁸ Da. Cultivar ‘HB‐14’ was superior to the other cultivars, when combining larger seed size, higher resistant starch level and better properties.     

Kinetics of roasting of split chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

The effects of three roasting temperatures on rates of moisture loss, size reduction and increase in bulk density in roasting chickpea dhal in a small rotary roaster mostly followed first order kinetics. Electrical energy use was more efficient at 150 than 125 or 100°C.