Effects of urea fertigation of apple trees on soil pH,exchangeable cations and extractable manganese in a sandy loam soil in New Zealand

Changes in soil pH, exchangeable aluminium (Al), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and potassium (K) and extractable manganese (Mn) were investigated after urea fertigation of a sandy loam soil in an apple orchard in New Zealand. Urea at three rates (0, 25, 50 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1 or 0, 16.9, 33.8 g N emitter^–1 yr^–1) was applied in 4 equal fertigations. Soil cores at 4 profile depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–40 and 40–60 cm) directly below and 20 cm from the emitter were sampled approximately 4 weeks after each fertigation and in the following winter. Results obtained showed that the largest changes in soil pH and cations occurred in soils directly below the emitter in the 50 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1 treatment where the soil pH decreased by 1.6 pH units at all soil depths. The lowest pH of 4.3 was observed at a depth of 27 cm. Exchangeable Al and extractable Mn levels increased to 11 meq kg^–1 and 78µg g^–1 respectively. Estimated losses of Ca, Mg and K from the upper soil profile depth (0–10 cm) represented 23, 63 and 27% of their respective total exchangeable levels. At lower profile depths (>20 cm), accumulation of displaced K was evident. Variable, and generally non-significant, chemical changes recorded in soils 20 cm from the emitter were attributed to restricted lateral water movement, and therefore urea movement, down the profile.The present study showed that one season of urea fertigation by trickle emitters, applied to a sandy loam, at half the rate conventionally applied to apple orchards (50 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1) resulted in pH and mineral element imbalances which were potentially and sufficiently severe to inhibit tree growth.     

Principles of fertilizer use for trickle irrigated crops

Under trickle irrigation only a portion of the soil volume around each plant is usually wetted. Typically this is an eliptically shaped volume directly below the emitter. Crop root growth is essentially restricted to this volume of soil and nutrient reserves within that volume can become depleted by crop uptake and/or leaching below the root zone.If nutrients are applied outside the wetted soil volume they are generally not available for crop use. Fertilizer placement is therefore an important consideration for trickle irrigated crops. Thus, applications banded close to the emitters are preferable to broadcast applications. In general, injection of nutrients into the irrigation water (fertigation) gives a better crop response than either banded or broadcast applications. Fertigation gives a flexibility of fertilization which enables the specific nutritional requirements of the crop to be met at different stages of its growth. In comparison with conventional methods of irrigation and fertilization it appears that trickle fertigation can, under some conditions, produce comparable or higher crop yields with substantial savings (of up to 50 percent) in fertilizer useage.Fertilizer materials used for fertigation must be completely soluble in water and must not react with substances in the irrigation water to form insoluble precipitates. An uneven distribution of nutrients within the crop rooting zone occurs under fertigation since immobile nutrients such as phosphate become concentrated around the emitter while mobile ions such as nitrate and potassium move downward and outward with the wetting front and accumulate at the periphery of the wetted soil volume. Plants, however, appear to have the ability to adapt to spatial variability of available nutrients in soils.     

Fate of Fertilizer15N applied as urea and ammonium sulphate in opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) grown under greenhouse conditions

Laboratory incubation and greenhouse experiments were conducted to investigate the comparative effectiveness of urea and ammonium sulphate in opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) using¹⁵N dilution techniques. Fertilizer treatments were control (no N), 600 mg N pot^–1 and 1200 mg N pot^–1 (12 kg oven dry soil) applied as aqueous solution of urea or ammonium sulphate. Fertilizer rates, under laboratory incubation study were similar to that under greenhouse conditions. A fertilizer¹⁵N balance sheet reveals that N recovery by plants was 28–39% with urea and 35–45% with ammonium sulphate. Total recovery of¹⁵N in soil-plant system was 77–82% in urea. The corresponding estimates for ammonium sulphate were 89–91%. Consequently the unaccounted fertilizer N was higher under urea (18–23%) as compared to that in ammonium sulphate (9–11%). The soil pH increased from 8.2 to 9.4 with urea whereas in ammonium sulphate treated soil pH decreased to 7.3 during 30 days after fertilizer application. The rate of NH₃ volatilization, measured under laboratory conditions, was higher with urea as compared to the same level of ammonium sulphate. The changes in pH of soil followed the identical trend both under laboratory and greenhouse conditions.     

Laboratory study of soil acidification and leaching of nutrients from a soil amended with various surface-incorporated acidifying agents

Granular S, finely-ground S, iron sulphate and aluminium sulphate were added at two rates to the surface (0–6 cm) of a soil and acidification and leaching of nutrients were measured over 12 months in a laboratory study. Iron and aluminium sulphate both rapidly lowered soil pH in the top 0–6 cm of the soil. There was little difference in soil pH after 3 and 12 months reaction of these two amendments. In contrast, for granular S and finely-ground S there were clear decreases in soil pH between 3 and 12 months reaction with the soil. Finely-ground S was oxidized in the soil faster than granular S and therefore had a more acidifying effect. The top 0–6 cm of the soil was acidified by all the agents used but the deeper soil was less affected. The only treatments which lowered the pH of the 12–18 cm layer below pH 6 were the high rates of iron and aluminium sulphate. Soil acidification resulted in a decrease in exchangeable Ca, Mg and K, an increase in exchangeable Al and a decrease in effective CEC in the acidified soil layers.At both levels of addition, total ionic strength of percolates from the soil followed the order: aluminium sulphate = iron sulphate > finely gound S > granular S > control and was higher at the higher rate of addition. The pH values of percolates followed the order: control > granular S > finely ground S > iron sulphate = aluminium sulphate and were lower at the higher rate of addition. For the amended soils there was a very close relationship between the pattern and total amounts of SO ₄ ^2- and Ca²⁺ leached.It was concluded that granular S is not an effective acidifying agent since it is oxidized very slowly in the soil and that acidfying agents should be incorporated to the depth that acidification is required.     

Yield response and nitrogen utilization efficiency by drip-irrigated potato

Two field experiments were conducted in the Jordan Valley to evaluate potato response to N fertigation. Nitrogen as ammonium sulphate was supplied through irrigation water (fertigation) at rates of 0, 35, 70 and 105 mg N l^-1. Soil N application treatment equivalent to the fertigation treatment of 70 mg N l^-1 was included. ¹⁵N labelled ammonium sulphate was used to evaluate the N recovery and utilization efficiency. Yield increased by the N rate. The soil N application gave higher yield than the zero N and lower than the fertigated treatments. The increase in yield was due to the increase in the size of the tubers. The specific gravity was the highest with the zero N. The index ratios of potato tubers were similar with all treatments. The N derived from fertilizers by both tubers and shoots, increased with the N rate regardless of the method of application. The soil application treatments had fertilizer utilization as high as the fertigation treatments and produced total tuber yield not significantly different from that obtained by the fertigation treatment with similar rate. This might be attributed to the poor fertilizer distribution in the root zone in the fine textured soil. The low value of the fertilizer utilization of the plant receiving the ¹⁵N in the preceding season suggested possibilities of rapid transformation and immobilization by the soil microorganisms.     

The effect of fertiliser type and application rate on denitrification losses from cut grassland in Northern Ireland

Denitrification losses were measured using the acetylene inhibition technique adapted for a coring procedure. Two soils under a cut ryegrass sward were used. One soil was a freely-drained clay loam receiving under 900 mm rainfall annually, the other soil being a poorly-drained silty clay receiving over 1100 mm rainfall annually. Swards at each site received up to 300 kg N ha^–1 yr^–1 of calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN), urea or a new fertiliser mixture GRANUMS (30% ammonium nitrate, 30% urea, 10% ammonium sulphate, 30% dolomite). For both soils the rate of denitrification exceeded 0.1 kg N ha^–1 day^–1 only when the air-filled porosity of the soil was < 30% v/v and soil nitrate was > 2 mg N kg^–1 in the top 10cm of the profile and when soil temperature at 10 cm was > 4°C. When the soils dried such that their air-filled porosity was > 30% v/v, denitrification rates decreased to < 0.08 kg N ha^–1 day^–1. Highest rates (up to 3.7 kg N ha^–1 day^–1) were observed on the clay soil following application of 94 kg N ha^–1 CAN to soil near field capacity in early summer 1986. Losses from CAN were approximately 3 times those from urea for a given application. Denitrification losses from the GRANUMS treatment were, overall, intermediate between those from CAN and urea but the daily losses more closely resembled those from the CAN treatment. The impeded drainage on the clay soil, where soil moisture contents remained close to field capacity throughout the year, showed denitrification losses roughly 3 times those observed on the more freely drained clay-loam for any given treatment. Over a 12-month period, N losses arising from denitrification were 29.0 and 10.0 kg N ha^–1 for plots receiving 300 kg N ha^–1 CAN and urea, respectively, on the well drained clay-loam and 79.0 and 31.1 kg N ha^–1 respectively, for identical plots on the poorly drained clay soil. Annual denitrification losses from control plots were < 1 kg N ha^–1 on both soils.     

Ammonia volatilization from urea and ammoniacal fertilizers surface applied to winter wheat and grassland

Ammonia volatilization from urea, diammonium phosphate, ammonium sulphate and calcium ammonium nitrate surface applied to winter wheat and grassland was determined with windtunnels. The fertilizers were applied at a rate of 8–12 g N m^–2 to plots on a non-calcareous sandy loam. Five experiments were carried out during March to June 1992, each experiment including 2 to 4 treatments with two or three replications. The daily ammonia loss rate was measured during 15 to 20 days. Cumulated daily loss of ammonia from urea followed a sigmoidal expression, while the cumulated ammonia loss from diammonium phosphate showed a logarithmic relationship with time from application. For ammonium sulphate and calcium ammonium nitrate no significant loss could be determined, because daily loss of ammonia were at the detection limit of the wind tunnels. Mean cumulated ammonia loss from plots receiving urea, diammonium phosphate, ammonium sulphate and calcium ammonium nitrate were 25%, 14%, <5% and <2%, respectively, during a 15–20 day measuring period.     

Nutrient cycling in a cropping system with potato, spring wheat, sugar beet, oats and nitrogen catch crops. II. Effect of catch crops on nitrate leaching in autumn and winter

The Nitrate Directive of the European Union (EU) forces agriculture to reduce nitrate emission. The current study addressed nitrate emission and nitrate-N concentrations in leachate from cropping systems with and without the cultivation of catch crops (winter rye: Secale cereale L. and forage rape: Brassica napus ssp. oleifera (Metzg.) Sinksk). For this purpose, ceramic suction cups were used, installed at 80 cm below the soil surface. Soil water samples were extracted at intervals of ca 14 days over the course of three leaching seasons (September – February) in 1992–1995 on sandy soil in a crop rotation comprising potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and oats (Avena sativa L.). Nitrate-N concentration was determined in the soil water samples. In a selection of samples several cations and anions were determined in order to analyze which cations primarily leach in combination with nitrate. The water flux at 80 cm depth was calculated with the SWAP model. Nitrate-N loss per interval was obtained by multiplying the measured nitrate-N concentration and the calculated flux. Accumulation over the season yielded the total nitrate-N leaching and the seasonal flux-weighted nitrate-N concentration in leachate. Among the cases studied, the total leaching of nitrate-N ranged between 30 and 140 kg ha^–1. Over the leaching season, the flux-weighted nitrate-N concentration ranged between 5 and 25 mg L^–1. Without catch crop cultivation, that concentration exceeded the EU nitrate-N standard (11.3 mg L^–1) in all cases. Averaged for the current rotation, cultivation of catch crops would result in average nitrate-N concentrations in leachate near or below the EU nitrate standard. Nitrate-N concentrations correlated with calcium concentration and to a lesser extent with magnesium and potassium, indicating that these three ion species primarily leach in combination with nitrate. It is concluded that systematic inclusion of catch crops helps to decrease the nitrate-N concentration in leachate to values near or below the EU standard in arable rotations on sandy soils.     

Nutrient availability under trickle irrigation — phosphate fertilization

The effect of fertilization on the distribution of Bray No. 1 phosphate, total soil phosphate, iron, calcium, manganese and aluminium were studied in a trickle irrigated vineyard.Placement of superphosphate (9% P, 12% S, 20% Ca) at the trickle outlet increased phosphate availability to at least 22 cm depth, and the volume of soil containing more readily available phosphate increased with increasing application rate (18, 36.5 and 73 g per vine). Adding lime to the superphosphate increased P availability below the trickle outlet, but had little effect elsewhere.Placement of 73 g of P at the trickle outlet more than doubled total phosphate to between 20 and 40 cm below the surface. There was a significant linear relationship between P application rate and P concentration in vine leaves.The distribution of aluminium and manganese around the outlet did not change, and most of the calcium from the superphosphate was retained within 5 cm of the application point. Applying P reduced total iron in a region extending to at least 35–40 cm below the surface and to between 15 and 45 cm from the outlet. Reducing conditions in the soil during the irrigation cycle probably caused dissolution of iron which then moved into the profile in association with the P. Loss of iron would also have reduced the capacity of the soil to absorb phosphate, increasing its availability and enhancing its penetration to 25–35 cm.The results show placement of small quantities of superphosphate near the trickle outlet is a satisfactory alternative to broadcasting. (deceased)     

Movement and distribution of fertilizer nitrogen as affected by depth of placement in wetland rice

Experiments were conducted to monitor the movement and distribution of ammonium-N after placement of urea and ammonium sulfate supergranules at 5, 7.5, 10, and 15 cm. By varying depths of fertilizer placement, it is possible to determine the appropriate depth for placement machines. There were no significant differences in grain yields with nitrogen placed 5 and 15 cm deep. However, grain yields were significantly higher with deep placement of nitrogen than with split application of the fertilizer. The lower yields with split-applied nitrogen were due to higher nitrogen losses from the floodwater. The floodwater with split application had 78–98µg N ml^–1 and that with deep-placed nitrogen had a negligible nitrogen concentration.Movement of NH ₄ ⁺ -N in the soil was traced for various depths after fertilizer nitrogen application. The general movement after deep-placement of the ammonium sulfate supergranules was downward > lateral > upward from the placement site. Downward movement was prevalent in the dry season: fertilizer placed at 5–7.5 cm produced a peak of NH ₄ ⁺ -N concentration at 8–12 cm soil depth; with placement at 15 cm, the fertilizer moved to 12–20 cm soil depth. Fertilizer placed at 10 cm tended to be stable. In the wet season, deep-placed N fertilizer was fairly stable and downward movement was minimal.A substantially greater percentage of plant N was derived from¹⁵N-depleted fertilizer when deep-placed in the reduced soil layer than that applied in split doses. The percent N recovery with different placement depths, however, did not vary from each other. The results suggest that nitrogen placement at a 5-cm soil depth is adequate for high rice yields in a clayey soil with good water control. In farmers' fields where soil and water conditions are often less than ideal, however, it is desirable to place nitrogen fertilizer at greater depths and minimize NH ₄ ⁺ -N concentration in floodwater.     

Effects of applied nitrogen on soil nitrate-nitrogen content after harvest of winter barley

Seven field trials were conducted on winter barley to define relationships between rate of applied N, the amount of nitrate-N present in the soil after harvest and the ratio of soil nitrate-N to grain yield. Applying N up to the economic optimum rate (estimated from yield and N rate data from individual trials) was associated with small increases in soil nitrate-N after harvest (the mean increase was 4 kg N ha^–1). Where the optimum N rate was exceeded, soil nitrate-N levels increased to a greater extent. In every trial, the ratio of soil nitrate-N to yield showed a minimum at a fertilizer N rate below the economic optimum. However, the value of the ratio was always lower at the optimum N rate (mean value 6.0 kg N t^–1) than at the zero-N treatment (mean value 8.9 kg N t^–1) and the difference between the minimum value (mean 5.6 kg N t^–1) and that found at the optimum N rate was small.Overall, application of fertilizer N up to the economic optimum rate for practical purposes could be regarded as consistent with the objective of minimising the risk of nitrate leaching per hectare and per tonne of grain in the trials.     

Fate and efficiency of nitrogen fertilizers applied to wetland rice. II. Punjab,India

Two modified urea products (urea supergranules [USG] and sulfur-coated urea [SCU]) were compared with conventional urea and ammonium sulfate as sources of nitrogen (N), applied at 58 kg N ha^–1 and 116 kg N ha^–1, for lowland rice grown in an alkaline soil of low organic matter and light texture (Typic Ustipsamment) having a water percolation rate of 109 mm day^–1. The SCU and USG were applied at transplanting, and the whole dose of nitrogen was¹⁵N-labeled; the SCU was prepared in the laboratory and was not completely representative of commercial SCU. The SCU was broadcast and incorporated, whereas the USG was point-placed at a depth of 7–8 cm. The urea and ammonium sulfate applications were split: two-thirds was broadcast and incorporated at transplanting, and one-third was broadcast at panicle initiation. All fertilizers except the last one-third of the urea and ammonium sulfate were labeled with¹⁵N so that a fertilizer-N balance at flowering and maturity stages of the crop could be constructed and the magnitude of N loss assessed.At all harvests and N rates, rice recovered more¹⁵N from SCU than from the other sources. At maturity, the crop recovered 38 to 42% of the¹⁵N from SCU and only 23 to 31% of the¹⁵N from the conventional fertilizers, urea and ammonium sulfate, whose recovery rates were not significantly different. In contrast, less than 9% of the USG-N was utilized. Fertilizer nitrogen uptake was directly related to the yield response from the different sources. Most of the fertilizer N was taken up by the time the plants were flowering although recovery did increase up to maturity in some treatments.Analysis of the soil plus roots revealed that less than 1% of the added¹⁵N was in the mineral form. Between 20 and 30% of the¹⁵N applied as urea, SCU, and ammonium sulfate was recovered in the soil plus roots, mainly in the 0–15 cm soil layer. Only 16% of the¹⁵N applied as USG was recovered in the soil, and this¹⁵N was distributed throughout the soil profile to a depth of 70 cm, which was the lowest depth of sampling.Calculations of the¹⁵N balance showed that 46 to 50% of the urea and ammonium sulfate was unaccounted for and considered lost from the system. Only 27 to 38% of the¹⁵N applied as SCU was not recovered at maturity, but 78% of the USG application was unaccounted for. The extensive losses and poor plant recovery of USG at this site are discussed in relation to the high percolation rate, which is atypical of many ricegrowing areas.     

Distribution of acid extractable P and exchangeable K in a grassland soil as affected by long-term surface application of N, P and K fertilizers

Information on the fate and distribution of surface-applied fertilizer P and K in soil is needed in order to assess their availability to plants and potential for water contamination. Distribution of extractable P (in 0.03 M NH₄F + 0.03 M H₂SO₄ solution) and exchangeable K (in neutral 1.0 M ammonium acetate solution) in the soil as a result of selected combinations of 30 years (1968–1997) of N fertilization (84–336 kg N ha^–1), 10 years of P fertilization (0–132 kg P ha^–1), and 14 years of K fertilization (0 and 46 kg K ha^–1) was studied in a field experiment on a thin Black Chernozem loam under smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) at Crossfield, Alberta, Canada. Soil samples were taken at regular intervals in October 1997 from 0–5, 5–10, 10–15, 15–30, 30–60, 60–90 and 90–120 cm layers. Soil pH decreased with N rate and this declined with soil depth. Increase in extractable P concentration in the soil reflected 10 years of P fertilization relative to no P fertilization, even though it had been terminated 20 years prior to soil sampling. The magnitude and depth of increase in extractable P paralleled N and P rates. The extractable P concentration in the 0–5 cm soil layer increased by 2.2, 20.7, 30.4 and 34.5 mg P kg^–1 soil at 84, 168, 280 and 336 kg N ha^–1, respectively. The increase in extractable P concentration in the 0–15 cm soil depth was 1.5 and 12.8 mg P kg^–1 soil with application of 16 and 33 kg P ha^–1 (N rate of 84 N ha^–1 for both treatments), respectively; and it was 81.6 and 155.2 mg P kg^–1 soil with application of 66 and 132 kg P ha^–1 (N rate of 336 N ha^–1 for both treatments), respectively. The increase in extractable P at high N rates was attributed to N-induced soil acidification. Most of the increase in extractable P occurred in the top 10-cm soil layer and almost none was noticed below 30 cm depth. Surface-applied K was able to prevent depletion of exchangeable K from the 0–90 cm soil, which occurred with increased bromegrass production from N fertilization in the absence of K application. As only a small increase of exchangeable K was observed in the 10–30 cm soil, 46 kg K ha^–1 year^–1 was considered necessary to achieve a balance between fertilization and bromegrass uptake for K. The potential for P contamination of surface water may be increased with the high N and P rates, as most of the increase in extractable P occurred near the soil surface.     

Nitrogen transformations near urea in soil: Effects of nitrification inhibition,nitrifier activity and liming

A laboratory incubation experiment was conducted to gain a better understanding of N transformations which occur near large urea granules in soil and the effects of dicyandiamide (DCD), nitrifier activity and liming. Soil cores containing a layer of urea were used to provide a one-dimensional approach and to facilitate sampling. A uniform layer of 2 g urea or urea + DCD was placed in the centre of a 20 cm-long soil core within PVC tubing. DCD was mixed with urea powder at 50 mg kg^–1 urea and enrichment of soil with nitrifiers was accomplished by preincubating Conestogo silt loam with 50 mg NH ₄ ⁺ -N kg^–1 soil. Brookston clay (pH 5.7) was limited with CaCO₃ to increase the pH to 7.3. The cores were incubated at 15°C and, after periods of 10, 20, 35 and 45 days, were separated into 1-cm sections. The distribution of N species was similar on each side of the urea layer at each sampling. The pH and NH ₄ ⁺ (NH₃) concentration were very high near the urea layer but decreased sharply with distance from it. DCD did not influence urea hydrolysis significantly. Liming of Brookston clay increased urea hydrolysis. The rate of urea hydrolysis was greater in Conestogo silt loam than limed Brookston clay. Nitrite accumulate was relatively small with all the treatments and occurred near the urea layer (0–4 cm) where pH and NH ₄ ⁺ (NH₃) concentration were high. The nitrification occurred in the zone where NH ₄ ⁺ (NH₃) concentration was below 1000µgN g^–1 and soil pH was below 8.0 and 8.7 in Brookston and Conestogo soils, respectively. DCD reduced the nitrifier activity (NA) in soil thereby markedly inhibiting nitrification of NH ₄ ⁺ . Nitrification was increased significantly with liming of the Brookston soil or nitrifier enrichment of the Conestogo soil. There was a significant increase in NA during the nitrification of urea-N. The (NO ₂ ^– + NO ₃ ^– )-N concentration peaks coincided with the NA peaks in the soil cores.A practical implication of this work is that large urea granules will not necessarily result in NO ₂ ^– phytotoxicity when applied near plants. A placement depth of about 5 cm below the soil surface may preclude NH₃ loss from large urea granules. DCD is a potential nitrification inhibitor for use with large urea granules or small urea granules placed in nests.     

A microplot study of the fate of15N-labelled ammonium nitrate and urea applied at two rates to ryegrass in spring

Confined microplots were used to study the fate of¹⁵N-labelled ammonium nitrate and urea when applied to ryegrass in spring at 3 lowland sites (S1, S2 and S3). Urea and differentially and doubly labelled ammonium nitrate were applied at 50 and 100 kg N ha^–1. The % utilization of the¹⁵N-labelled fertilizer was measured in 3 cuts of herbage and in soil to a depth of 15 cm (soil_0–15).Over all rates, forms and sites, the % utilization values for cuts 1, 2, 3 and soil_0–15 were 52.4, 5.3, 2.4 and 16.0% respectively. The % utilization of¹⁵N in herbage varied little as the rate of application increased but the % utilization in the soil_0–15 decreased as the rate of application increased. The total % utilization values in herbage plus soil_0–15 indicated that losses of N increased from 12 to 25 kg N ha^–1 as the rate of N application was increased from 50 to 100 kg N ha^–1.The total % utilization values in herbage plus soil_0–15 over both rates of fertilizer N application were 84.1, 80.8 and 81.0% for urea compared with 74.9, 72.5 and 74.4% for all ammonium nitrate forms at S1, S2 and S3 respectively. Within ammonium nitrate forms, the total % utilization values in herbage plus soil_0–15 over both rates and all sites were 76.7, 69.4 and 75.7% for¹⁵NH₄NO₃, NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ and¹⁵NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ respectively. The utilization of the nitrate moiety of ammonium nitrate was lower than the utilization of the ammonium moiety.The distribution of labelled fertilizer between herbage and soil_0–15 varied with soil type. As the total utilization of labelled fertilizer was similar at all sites the cumulative losses due to denitrification and downward movement appeared to account for approximately equal amounts of N at each site.     

Comparison of several nitrogen fertilisers applied in surface irrigation systems. I. Crop response

The effect of several N carriers applied in the surface irrigation water on the growth, yield and N status of maize was studied in 2 seasons. The carriers applied in the water included anhydrous ammonia, ammonium sulphate, ammonium nitrate, potassium nitrate and urea and they were compared with a preplant band application of anhydrous ammonia and a control treatment. All N treatments received 100 kg N ha^–1. The site used in the second experiment was less responsive to N fertiliser than the first site and the crop growth in the second season was affected by an attack of charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina).Urea, as a N source for fertigation, was superior to the ammonium forms, while the nitrate carriers were the least efficient. Water-run urea increased the maize yield by 27% when compared with the band application in the first season but was 6% lower in the second season. Fertigation allowed N to be applied during the grand period of growth when N stress was most likely to occur. This technique for applying N fertiliser to surface irrigated crops has been adopted by commercial growers.     

Initial and residual effects of nitrogen fertilizers on grain yield of a maize/bean intercrop grown on a Humic Nitosol and the fate and efficiency of the applied nitrogen

Initial and residual effects of nitrogen (N) fertilizers on grain yield of a maize/bean intercrop grown on a deep, well-drained Humic Nitosol (66% clay, 3% organic carbon) were evaluated. Enriched (¹⁵N) N fertilizer was used to study the fate of applied N in two seasons: using urea (banded) at 50 kg N ha^–1 in one season, and¹⁵N-enriched urea (banded), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN, banded), and urea supergranules (USG, point placement) were applied in the other season (different field) at 100 kg N ha^–1. Nitrogen fertilizer significantly (P = 0.05) increased equivalent maize grain yield in each season of application with no significant differences between N sources, i.e., urea, CAN, and USG. Profitmaximizing rates ranged from 75 to 97 kg N ha^–1 and value: cost ratios ranged from 3.0 to 4.8. Urea gave the highest value: cost ratio in each season. Most (lowest measurement 81%) of the applied N was accounted for by analyzing the soil (to 150 cm depth) and plant material. Measurements for urea, CAN, and USG were not significantly different. The high N measurements suggest low losses of applied N fertilizer under the conditions of the study. Maize plant recovery ranged from 35 to 55%; most of this N (51–65%) was in the grain. Bean plant recovery ranged from 8 to 20%. About 34–43% of the applied N fertilizer remained in the soil, and most of it (about 70%) was within the top soil layer (0–30 cm). However, there were no significant equivalent maize grain increases in seasons following N application indicating no beneficial residual effect of the applied fertilizers.     

Nitrogen-15 balances and nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency in upland rice

Field experiments were conducted in the 1984 and 1985 wet seasons to determine the effect of N fertilizer application method on¹⁵N balances and yield for upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) on an Udic Arguistoll in the Philippines. The test cultivars were IR43 and UPLRi-5 in 1984 and IR43 in 1985. Unrecovered¹⁵N in¹⁵N balances for 70 kg applied urea-N ha^–1, which represented N fertilizer losses as gases and movement below 0.5 m soil depth, ranged from 11–58% of the applied N. It was lowest (11–13%) for urea split applied at 30 days after seeding (DS) and at panicle initiation (PI), and highest (27–58%) for treatments receiving basal urea in the seed furrows. In all treatments with basal-applied urea, most N losses occurred before 50 DS.Heavy rainfall in 1985 before rice emergence resulted in large losses of native soil N and fertilizer N by leaching and possibly by denitrification. During the week of seeding, when rainfall was 492 mm, 91 kg nitrate-N ha^–1 disappeared from the 0.3-m soil layer in unfertilized plots. Although rainfall following the basal N application was less in 1984 than in 1985, the losses from basal applied urea-N were comparable in the two years. Daily rainfall of 20–25 mm on 3 of the 6 days following basal N application in 1984 may have created a moist soil environment favorable for ammonia volatilization.In both years, highest grain yield was obtained for urea split-applied at 30 DS and at PI. Delayed rather than basal application of N reduced losses of fertilizer N and minimized uptake of fertilizer N by weeds.     

Effect of source and nest size of N fertilizers and temperature on nitrification in a coarse textured, alkaline soil

Nitrification occurring in an alkaline sandy loam soil fertilized with urea, ammonium sulphate (AS) and ammonium chloride (AC) was studied in the laboratory at 20°C and 40°C for 30 days. Nitrogen fertilizers were applied as nest of sizes 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 g. Unfertilized control and soil mixed with 50 mg N kg^-1 were also included as treatments.Nitrification in all the fertilizer treatments decreased markedly with increasing nest size. At 20°C, differences among the three N sources were not significant at 5 days after incubation but marked differences appeared thereafter. All the N was nitrified by 30 days in case of fertilizers mixed into the soil. In nest placement, nitrification ranged from 30.1 to 75.5%, 28.3 to 74.6% and 35.3 to 88.7% for urea, AC and AS, respectively. When equal amounts of fertilizers were placed in a nest, nitrification occurred at a slower rate with urea than with AC and AS. Rates of nitrification were significantly higher at 40°C than at 20°C. At 20 days, nitrification from different nest sizes ranged from 8.4 to 64.9% and from 24.9 to 87.0% at 20°C and 40°C, respectively. The difference in nitrification at two temperatures were more pronounced at higher nest sizes than at smaller nest sizes. While nitrification with the three N sources decreased linearly with increase in N concentration (nest size) in soil at 40°C, it showed a quadratic relationship at 20°C. At equal N concentration, the highest rate of nitrification occurred with urea and the lowest with AC. At the same rate of applied N (50–2000 mg kg^-1), AC and AS increased electrical conductivity of soil by 1.3–9 times that of urea. Apparent mineral N recovery of applied N decreased with the increase in nest size.     

Evaluation of ammonium thiosulfate as a soil urease inhibitor

Interest in use of ammonium thiosulfate (ATS) in conjunction with urea as a fertilizer has been stimulated by recent reports that this compound retards hydrolysis of urea by soil urease and thereby reduces volatilization of urea N as ammonia from soils fertilized with urea. We evaluated ATS as a soil urease inhibitor by studying its effects on urea hydrolysis, seed germination, and early seedling growth in soil. We found that ATS significantly retarded urea hydrolysis only when applied at rates as high as 2,500 or 5,000µg g^–1 soil, whereasN-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) (a patented inhibitor of urea hydrolysis in soil) caused substantial retardation of urea hydrolysis when applied at rates as low as 1µg g^–1 soil. We also found that ATS had an adverse effect on germination of corn or wheat seeds in soil when applied at the rate of 2,500 or 5,000µg g^–1 soil and caused a dramatic reduction of early seedling growth of corn or wheat when applied at the rate of 1,000, 2,500, or 5,000µg g^–1 soil. These findings indicate that ATS has little, if any, potential value for retarding hydrolysis of urea fertilizer in soil.