Adenosine-sensitive atrial reentrant tachycardia originating from the atrioventricular nodal transitional area

INTRODUCTION: Atrial tachycardia shows wide variations in its electrophysiologic properties and sites of origin. We report an atrial tachycardia with ECG manifestations and electrophysiologic characteristics similar to an atypical form of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: This supraventricular tachycardia was observed in 11 patients. It was initiated by atrial extrastimulation with an inverse relationship between the coupling interval of an extrastimulus and the postextrastimulus interval. Its induction was not related to a jump in the AH interval, and its perpetuation was independent of conduction block in AV node. Ventricular pacing during tachycardia demonstrated AV dissociation without affecting the atrial cycle length. A very small dose of adenosine triphosphate (mean 3.9 +/- 1.2 mg) could terminate the tachycardia. The earliest atrial activation during tachycardia was recorded at the low anteroseptal right atrium with a different intra-atrial activation sequence from that recorded during ventricular pacing, where the tachycardia was successfully ablated in 9 of 10 attempted patients. Bidirectional AV nodal conduction remained unaffected after successful ablation. CONCLUSION: There may be an entity of adenosine-sensitive atrial tachycardia probably due to focal reentry within the AV node or its transitional tissues without involvement of the AV nodal pathways. This tachycardia can be ablated without disturbing AV nodal conduction from the right atrial septum.     

Atypical atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia with atrioventricular block mimicking atrial tachycardia: electrophysiologic properties and radiofrequency ablation therapy

INTRODUCTION: Fast-intermediate form AV nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) sometimes may mimic atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter and render the diagnosis difficult when the tachycardia rate is fast and AV block occurs during tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 45-year-old woman with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia was referred to this institution. Initially, the tachycardia was thought to be an atrial tachycardia because of: (1) a short cycle length of the tachycardia with 2:1 and Wenckebach AV block; (2) a difference in the atrial activation sequence during tachycardia and during ventricular pacing; and (3) failure of burst ventricular pacing to affect the atrial rate and the atrial activation sequence during tachycardia. An accurate diagnosis of fast-intermediate form AVNRT was subsequently made based on the finding that the tachycardia was induced following delivery of a third ventricular extrastimulus, which showed a sequence of V-A-H and a change on atrial activation sequence of the induced beat. Successful radiofrequency ablation was achieved only after accurate diagnosis of the tachycardia was made. CONCLUSION: Fast-intermediate form AVNRT sometimes may masquerade as atrial tachycardia. Accurate diagnosis is mandatory for successful ablation therapy.     

Effects of pharmacological autonomic blockade on dual atrioventricular nodal pathways physiology in patients with slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

The purpose of this study was to investigate the atrioventricular AV nodal physiology and the inducibility of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) under pharmacological autonomic blockade (AB). Seventeen consecutive patients (6 men and 11 women, mean age 39 +/- 17 years) with clinical recurrent slow-fast AVNRT received electrophysiological study before and after pharmacological AB with atropine (0.04 mg/kg) and propranolol (0.2 mg/kg). In baseline, all 17 patients could be induced with AVNRT, 5 were isoproterenol-dependent. After pharmacological AB, 12 (71%) of 17 patients still demonstrated AV nodal duality. AVNRT became noninducible in 7 of 12 nonisoproterenol dependent patients and remained noninducible in all 5 isoproterenol dependent patients. The sinus cycle length (801 +/- 105 ms vs 630 +/- 80 ms, P < 0.005) and AV blocking cycle length (365 +/- 64 ms vs 338 +/- 61 ms, P < 0.005) became shorter after AB. The antegrade effective refractory period and functional refractory period of the fast pathway (369 +/- 67 ms vs 305 +/- 73 ms, P < 0.005; 408 +/- 56 ms vs 350 +/- 62 ms, P < 0.005) and the slow pathway (271 +/- 30 ms vs 258 +/- 27 ms, P < 0.01; 344 +/- 60 ms vs 295 +/- 50 ms, P < 0.005) likewise became significantly shortened. However, the ventriculoatrial blocking cycle length (349 +/- 94 ms vs 326 +/- 89 ms, NS) and effective refractory period of retrograde fast pathway (228 +/- 38 ms vs 240 +/- 80 ms, NS) remained unchanged after autonomic blockade. Pharmacological AB unveiling the intrinsic AV nodal physiology could result in the masking of AV nodal duality and the decreased inducibility of clinical AVNRT.     

Induction of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia with adenosine: differential effect of adenosine on fast and slow atrioventricular node pathways

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the sensitivity of fast and slow atrioventricular (AV) node pathways to incremental doses of adenosine in patients with typical AV node reentrant tachycardia. BACKGROUND: Although adenosine is known to depress conduction through the AV node, the relative sensitivity to adenosine of the anterograde fast and slow pathways in patients with dual AV node pathways and typical AV node reentrant tachycardia has not previously been studied. METHODS: Sixteen patients with dual AV node physiology and typical AV node reentrant tachycardia and 10 control patients were given incremental doses of adenosine during atrial pacing. RESULTS: In 14 of 16 patients with dual-AV node physiology, administration of small doses of adenosine during atrial pacing led consistently to transient block of impulse conduction in the fast pathway before block in the slow pathway, resulting in abrupt prolongation of the AH interval with continued 1:1 AV conduction. The mean (+/- SD) doses of adenosine required to cause conduction block in the fast and slow pathways were 2.7 +/- 3.0 and 7.2 +/- 4.7 mg, respectively (p = 0.004). In 9 of 16 patients, administration of low dose adenosine led to initiation of AV node reentrant tachycardia. The control patients showed no abrupt increases in AH interval with administration of adenosine during atrial pacing. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with dual AV node pathways and typical AV node reentrant tachycardia, the fast pathway is more sensitive than the slow pathway to the effects of adenosine.     

Posterior fast atrioventricular node pathways: implications for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to present evidence that fast atrioventricular (AV) node pathways with posterior exit sites may participate in typical AV node reentry. BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of the slow AV node pathway in the posteroseptal right atrium is the preferred therapeutic approach in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia. Despite the success achieved with this approach, electrophysiologic changes consistent with fast pathway ablation are occasionally observed. One potential explanation is the presence of an aberrant posterior fast pathway. METHODS: The location of fast and slow AV node pathways was determined by atrial activation mapping along the tricuspid valve annulus during tachycardia and was further confirmed by the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation. RESULTS: Seven patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia had evidence of a posterior fast pathway near the coronary sinus os. Abolition of anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction followed radiofrequency ablation in the posteroseptal region in six patients. Consistent with fast pathway ablation, the AH interval increased from 70 +/- 24 to 195 +/- 35 ms (mean +/- SD), and tachycardia was no longer inducible. Selective slow pathway ablation was performed in one other patient with a posterior fast pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Functionally fast AV node pathways may be located in the posteroseptal right atrium, where slow pathway modification is performed. These data delineate the limitation of an anatomically guided slow pathway ablative approach and emphasize the importance of detailed mapping and localization of the retrograde fast pathway exit site before ablation. Failure to recognize the presence of posterior fast AV node pathways may account for sporadic examples of AV block, complicating posteroseptal ablation in patients with AV node reentry.     

New evidence that AV node slow pathway conduction directly influences fast pathway function

INTRODUCTION: Shortening of the AV node fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) following successful slow pathway ablation may be a nonspecific effect of energy application at the AV junction or may be due to elimination of a direct effect of slow pathway conduction on the fast pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six consecutive patients (20 women and 6 men; mean age 45 +/- 3 years) with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia who underwent successful slow pathway ablation (defined as complete elimination of dual AV node physiology) were studied. The fast pathway ERP (at a drive train cycle length of 600 msec) was determined prior to ablation (baseline) and following unsuccessful and successful ablation attempts. Successful slow pathway ablation shortened the fast pathway ERP significantly (317 +/- 9 msec; P < 0.001) compared to baseline (386 +/- 12 msec), whereas unsuccessful ablations had no effect (376 +/- 11 msec). Sinus cycle length, the AH interval, and blood pressure were unchanged following successful ablation. Shortening of the fast pathway ERP did not correlate with the number of energy applications or with two measures of the proximity between the slow and the fast pathway. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that shortening of the fast pathway ERP following slow pathway ablation is due to elimination of a direct effect of slow pathway conduction on fast pathway function rather than a nonspecific effect of repeated energy delivery at the AV junction.     

Catheter ablation for the common type of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway was attempted in 34 patients with common type of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Radiofrequency energy of 18-32 watts was applied for 30-60 seconds at sites exhibiting atrial-slow pathway potentials or slow potentials. These potentials were recorded at the mid or posterior septum, anterior to the coronary sinus ostium. A mean of two radiofrequency applications successfully eliminated AVNRT in all patients. The incidence of junctional ectopy was significantly higher during 34 effective applications of radiofrequency energy than during 36 ineffective applications (100% versus 17%). Thus, the recording of atrial-slow pathway potentials or slow potentials, and the development of junctional ectopy can be used as a marker for successful ablation. Slow AV nodal conduction was eliminated in 22 patients and persisted without inducible AVNRT in 12. None of the patients had recurrences of AVNRT over a mean follow-up interval of 12 months, and all had preserved AV conduction. Long-term follow-up studies with an electrophysiological method confirmed that the ablation was effective. Transient AV block was observed in only 1 patient, and no major complications were noted. Thus, radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway is highly effective and safe, with a low rate of complication, for the treatment of common type of AVNRT.     

Malaise scores in adulthood of children and young people who have been in care

Junctional rhythm is commonly observed during radiofrequency catheter ablation of the fast or slow pathways of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, the origin of these beats remains unclear. We analyzed the retrograde atrial activation sequence of 16 patients (mean +/- SD: 41.2 +/- 18.9 years old) undergoing catheter ablation for typical AVNRT with detailed catheter mapping of the triangle of Koch. The earliest atrial activations were concordant during tachycardia and junctional rhythm in only 5 of 16 patients. The findings suggest that junctional rhythm is unlikely to represent direct stimulation of the atrioventricular (AV) node via a discrete slow pathway but rather results from enhanced automaticity from > or =1 sites in the AV nodal transitional zone. The ensuing atrial activation pattern results from anisotropic spread from these sites. In addition, these data imply that the original concept of the AV node comprising 2 anatomically defined pathways may not be valid, and that a functionally defined pathway model may be a more accurate representation.     

Ventriculophasic modulation of atrioventricular nodal conduction in humans

BACKGROUND: Baroreceptor-mediated phasic changes in vagal tone have been hypothesized to cause ventriculophasic sinus arrhythmia (VPSA). The objectives of this study were to demonstrate ventriculophasic modulation of AV nodal conduction and to substantiate the role of the baroreflex on ventriculophasic AV nodal conduction (VPAVN) by pharmacological perturbation of parasympathetic tone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve patients with infra-Hisian second-degree heart block and VPSA were studied. Incremental atrial pacing was performed until AV nodal Wenckebach block at baseline, after phenylephrine infusion, and after atropine. AV nodal conduction curves were constructed for each phase and compared. At baseline, VPAVN was present in 9 of 12 patients on the steep portion of the AV nodal conduction curves. Phenylephrine increased systolic blood pressure from 149+/-33 to 177+/-22 mmHg (P<0.001) and sinus cycle length from 844+/-169 to 1010+/-190 ms (P<0.001) and shifted the AV nodal conduction curves up and to the right. Phenylephrine induced VPAVN in 2 of 3 patients in whom it was not present at baseline and in 11 of 12 total. Atropine abolished both VPSA and VPAVN in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: VPAVN was demonstrated in patients with infra-Hisian second-degree AV block. It was accentuated by phenylephrine and abolished by atropine, suggesting a baroreflex mechanism for VPSA and VPAVN.     

Absence of junctional rhythm during successful slow-pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: The presence of junctional rhythm has been considered to be a sensitive marker of successful slow-pathway ablation. However, in rare cases, junctional rhythm was absent despite multiple radiofrequency applications delivered over a large area in the Koch's triangle, and successful ablation was achieved in the absence of a junctional rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 353 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (143 men and 210 women; mean age, 50+/-17 years) who underwent catheter ablation of the slow pathway. Combined anatomic and electrogram approaches were used to guide ablation. Inducibility of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was assessed after each application of radiofrequency energy. Successful sites were located in the posterior area in 18 (90%) of 20 patients without junctional rhythm during slow-pathway ablation compared with 200 (60%) of 333 patients with junctional rhythm (P<0.001). The fast-slow form of tachycardia was more common in patients without than in those with junctional rhythm (30% versus 3%; P=0.001). At the successful ablation sites, patients with junctional rhythm had a higher incidence of a multicomponent or slow-pathway potential (51% versus 10%; P<0.001), a longer duration of the atrial electrogram (64+/-8 versus 50+/-9 ms; P=0.04), and a smaller atrial/ventricular electrogram amplitude ratio (0.29+/-0.18 versus 0.65+/-0.27; P<0. 001) than those without junctional rhythm. Mean temperatures at successful sites (56+/-6 degreesC versus 58+/-9 degreesC; P=0.57) and incidence of transient AV block (2% versus 0%; P=0.86) were similar between patients with and without junctional rhythms. By multivariate analysis, location of ablation sites, atrial/ventricular electrogram amplitude ratio, absence of a multicomponent or slow-pathway potential, and occurrence of the fast-slow form of tachycardia were independent predictors of the absence of a junctional rhythm during successful slow-pathway ablation. CONCLUSIONS: In some rare cases, successful slow-pathway ablation is possible in the absence of a junctional rhythm.     

Architecture of the atrial musculature in and around the triangle of Koch: its potential relevance to atrioventricular nodal reentry

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies suggest that atrial fibers in the approaches to the AV node form part of the dual pathways recognized electrophysiologically in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Our aim was to determine, by gross dissection, the arrangement of the superficial musculature in the area of the triangle of Koch in normal hearts and in hearts with documented AVNRT, hoping to ascertain anatomic features that might contribute to the debate. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used blunt dissection to study the architecture of the superficial atrial musculature in 16 autopsied hearts from adults who died of noncardiac disease. A well-defined pattern of architecture of muscle fibers was found in the region of the triangle of Koch, showing marked variations in 7 of the 16 specimens. The relationship of these fibers to the histologically specialized AV node was confirmed by histology in three cases. Two hearts from patients with known AVNRT, treated by ablation in one, were examined further histologically. These sections showed that the site of ablation was well distant from the histologically discrete AV node. CONCLUSION: The variability in the arrangement of the superficial atrial muscle fibers in the area of the triangle of Koch may be one of the factors influencing the route for impulses entering the AV node. Lesions that ablate nodal reentry are within these atrial fibers rather than the histologically specialized AV node.     

Radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia: comparison between fast (anterior) and slow (posterior) pathway ablation

OBJECTIVES: We compared the electrophysiologic effects on atrioventricular (AV) node physiology of selective "fast" versus selective "slow" pathway radiofrequency ablation in 42 patients with drug-resistant AV node reentrant tachycardia who underwent 51 ablation attempts to prevent tachycardia recurrence while preserving AV conduction. BACKGROUND: The recent introduction of radiofrequency ablation to treat AV node reentrant tachycardia allows the opportunity to study the effects of selective elimination of the different limbs involved in AV node reentrant tachycardia. METHODS: Selective fast pathway ablation was attempted in 13 patients by delivering radiofrequency energy anteriorly across the tricuspid valve anulus. Selective slow pathway ablation was attempted in 29 patients by delivering radiofrequency energy posteriorly across the tricuspid valve anulus at sites where putative slow pathway potentials were recorded. RESULTS: Selective fast pathway ablation eliminated AV node reentrant tachycardia without AV block in 6 (46%) of 13 patients after one ablation session and in an additional 3 patients (69% of total) after repeat ablation sessions. Slow pathway ablation eliminated AV node reentrant tachycardia without AV block in 26 (90%) of 29 patients after one radiofrequency ablation session and in an additional 2 patients (97% of total) after repeat ablation sessions. Selective fast pathway ablation increased the PR interval (140 to 220 ms, p = 0.0001) and AH interval (66 to 153 ms, p = 0.0001), whereas slow pathway ablation did not change these intervals. Fast pathway radiofrequency ablation caused retrograde block in 7 (64%) of 11 patients, whereas no patients undergoing slow pathway ablation developed selective retrograde block. Single AV node echo beats were commonly induced after slow but not fast pathway ablation (17 of 29 patients vs. 1 of 11 patients, respectively, p = 0.01) and did not predict recurrence of AV node reentrant tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: Successful selective radiofrequency ablation of fast or slow pathways in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia resulted in different electrophysiologic properties after ablation. Slow pathway ablation produced more successful outcomes, with a decreased prevalence of recurrent AV node reentrant tachycardia or AV block.     

Tachycardia-induced change of atrial refractory period in humans: rate dependency and effects of antiarrhythmic drugs

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been shown to shorten the atrial effective refractory period (ERP) and make the atrium more vulnerable to AF. This study investigated the effect of atrial rate and antiarrhythmic drugs on ERP shortening induced by tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy adult patients without structural heart disease were included. For the first part of the study, right atrial ERP was measured with a drive cycle length of 500 ms before and after 10 minutes of rapid atrial pacing using five pacing cycle lengths (450, 400, 350, 300, and 250 ms) in 10 patients. For the second part of the study, the remaining 60 patients were included to study the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on changes in atrial ERP induced by AF. Atrial ERP was measured with a drive cycle of 500 ms before and after an episode of pacing-induced AF. After the patients were randomized to receive one of six antiarrhythmic drugs (procainamide, propafenone, propranolol, dl-sotalol, amiodarone, and verapamil), atrial ERP was measured before and after another episode of pacing-induced AF. In the first part of the study, atrial ERP shortened significantly after 10 minutes of rapid atrial pacing, and the degree of shortening was correlated with pacing cycle length. The second part of the study showed that atrial ERP shortened after conversion of AF (172+/-15 versus 202+/-14 ms, P<0.0001) and that ERP shortening was attenuated after verapamil infusion (-4.6+/-1.2% versus -15.1+/-3.4%, P<0.001) but was unchanged after infusion of the other antiarrhythmic drugs. Furthermore, all of these antiarrhythmic drugs could decrease the incidence and duration of secondary AF. CONCLUSIONS: The atrial ERP shortening induced by tachycardia was a rate-dependent response. Verapamil, but not other antiarrhythmic drugs, could markedly attenuate this effect. However, verapamil and the other drugs could decrease the incidence and duration of secondary AF.     

Impact of severity of coronary artery stenosis and the collateral circulation on the functional outcome of dyssynergic myocardium after revascularization in patients with healed myocardial infarction and chronic left ventricular dysfunction

The inferoposterior region of the triangle of Koch is hypothesized to be the location of the atrial insertion of the slow atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway. However, the actual site of conduction slowing in the slow AV nodal pathway is unknown. Entrainment mapping during AV nodal reentry can localize the reentrant pathway as follows: the AH interval measured from the mapping catheter = A'H (where A' is the exit site of the reentrant circuit) minus A'A (the conduction time from A' to the site of mapping); the SH interval during entrainment = SA' (the conduction time from stimulus into the reentry circuit) plus A'H. Thus, in all cases, the SH interval should be greater than or equal to the AH interval, and the deltaAH-SH should increase as distance and conduction time (SA' and A'A) from the reentry circuit increases. Fourteen patients with typical AV nodal reentry (cycle length 346 +/- 62 ms) and 1 with fast-slow (cycle length 430 ms) underwent activation and entrainment mapping from 8 to 12 sites in the triangle of Koch and coronary sinus. Pacing was performed at 2 to 3 mA above threshold, at a cycle length 10 ms shorter than tachycardia. A mapping site was defined as being in close proximity to the circuit if the deltaAH-SH was within 120% of the shortest 20th percentile deltaAH-SH value from all measured sites. In the 14 typical cases, 45 of 83 sites (54%) in the anatomic slow pathway region fulfilled criteria for close proximity to the reentry circuit compared with 13 of 50 sites (26%) outside of this region (p = 0.005). For these patients, the shortest SH interval measured from any entrainment site was 294 +/- 58 ms (89 +/- 10% of tachycardia cycle length, range 70% to 119%), indicating that the site of slow conduction in the slow pathway during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was distal to all mapped sites. Thus, during typical AV nodal reentry, the "slow" pathway does not conduct slowly, and its insertion is located at or within the inferoposterior or midseptal regions in most cases.     

Effects of enhanced parasympathetic tone on atrioventricular nodal conduction during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

The effects of various physiologic and pharmacologic stimuli on the anterograde slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia are well characterized. We sought to further characterize the nature of anterograde and retrograde conduction during tachycardia and to define the differential input of the parasympathetic nervous system to these pathways. A custom-made neck suction collar was placed to stimulate the carotid body baroreceptors during supraventricular tachycardia. Neck suction at -60 mm Hg was applied and changes in tachycardia cycle length, AH, and ventriculoatrial intervals were measured in 20 patients. These measurements were repeated after intravenous administration of 10 mg of edrophonium to enhance vagal tone. We observed a 15 +/- 6 ms increase in tachycardia cycle length from baseline (p <0.0001) and a 14 +/- 6 ms increase in AH interval (p <0.0001), but no change in the VA interval with neck suction alone. The tachycardia cycle length prolonged 26 +/- 55 ms (p <0.0001) with edrophonium and an additional 12 +/- 43 ms (p <0.001) with neck suction after edrophonium. There was no change in the VA interval before or after edrophonium during neck suction. There were 10 tachycardia terminations in 8 patients during anterograde slow pathway block during neck suction, with tachycardia cycle length prolongation and mean AH prolongation before termination of 45 +/- 37 ms (vs 15 +/- 7 ms increase in AH interval without tachycardia termination, p = 0.10). There were 12 tachycardia terminations in 4 patients with retrograde block during neck suction, only after edrophonium, without any preceding change in tachycardia cycle length during 11 episodes. We conclude that anterograde slow pathway demonstrates gradual conduction slowing with parasympathetic enhancement, whereas retrograde fast pathway responds with abrupt block.     

Importance of endocardial ECG for successful AV-node modulation in patients with AV-node reentry tachycardia

In 49 patients undergoing slow pathway (SP) ablation for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) the local electrograms of successful and non-successful radiofrequency current applications taken from the mapping/ablation catheter in the posteroseptal space were retrospectively analyzed with respect to the following parameters: 1) ratio of local atrial (A) to local ventricular (V) electrogram amplitude (A/V-ratio), 2) presence of fractionated atrial activity (FAA) or SP potential (SPP), 3) duration of local A electrogram. Ablation sites were classified in 3 groups: group I: no FAA/SPP, A/V-ratio > or = 0.25; group 2: FAA/SPP or A/V-ratio < 0.25; group 3: FAA/SPP and A/V-ratio < 0.25. RESULTS: In all patients SP ablation was successful after 4.6 +/- 4.4 applications. Successful ablation sites had a significantly smaller A/V-ratio than non-successful ones (0.2 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.44 +/- 0.06, p = 0.023). The local A electrogram duration was not significantly different (72.3 +/- 2.14 vs. 71 +/- 1.35 ms, p = n. s.). CONCLUSIONS: 1) In SP ablation of AVNRT the local A/V-ratio is significantly smaller in successful compared to non-successful ablation sites. 2) Local A electrogram duration does not correlate with ablation success. 3) A local A/V-ratio of < 0.25 and the presence of a SPP or FAA are correlated with ablation success.     

Atrioventricular junctional tissue. Discrepancy between histological and electrophysiological characteristics

BACKGROUND: Previous work has demonstrated that cells with AV nodal-type action potentials are not confined to Koch's triangle but may extend along the AV orifices. The aim of this study was to examine the histological and electrophysiological characteristics of this tissue. METHODS AND RESULTS: Studies were performed in isolated, blood-perfused dog and pig hearts. Microelectrode recordings revealed cells with nodal-type action potentials around the tricuspid and mitral valve rings. These cells were found within 1 to 2 mm of the valve annuli. A zone of cells with intermediate action potentials, approximately 1 cm wide, separated cells with nodal-type action potentials from cells with atrial-type action potentials in the body of the atria. In cells with nodal-type action potentials, adenosine caused a reduction in action potential amplitude (49 +/- 2 versus 33 +/- 2 mV, mean +/- SE; P < .001), upstroke velocity (2.5 +/- 0.2 versus 2.0 +/- 0.2 V/s, P < .05), and duration (150 +/- 4 versus 96 +/- 8 ms, P < .001). The light microscopic appearance of AV junctional cells was similar to that of myocytes in the body of the atrium. A polyclonal antibody raised against connexin-43 bound to atrial and ventricular tissue but not to the AV junctional tissue or AV nodal region. The absence of connexin-43 correlated with the sites of cells with nodal-like action potentials. With pacing techniques, the AV junctional tissue in the region of the posterior AV nodal approaches could be electrically dissociated from atrial, AV nodal, and ventricular tissue. AV nodal echoes were induced with ventricular pacing in three dog hearts. In each case, retrograde conduction was through the slow pathway, and anterograde conduction was through the fast pathway. During echoes, activation of AV junctional cells preceded atrial activation during retrograde slow pathway conduction, but these cells were not activated during anterograde fast pathway conduction. CONCLUSIONS: AV junctional cells around both annuli are histologically similar to atrial cells but resemble nodal cells in their cellular electrophysiology, response to adenosine, and lack of connexin-43. The light microscopic appearance of AV junctional cells is a poor guide to their action potential characteristics. The AV junctional cells in the posterior AV nodal approaches appear to participate in slow pathway conduction. These cells may be the substrate of the slow "AV nodal" pathway.     

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients with ventriculo-atrial conduction block

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the reversibility of retrograde ventriculo-atrial block by isoproterenol in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). DESIGN: Three case reports and their electrophysiological features. PATIENTS: Three patients with documented or suspected paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. INTERVENTIONS: At routine electrophysiology study, no supraventricular tachycardia was inducible in the baseline state. Infusion of isoproterenol (1 to 5 micrograms/min) was given and stimulation procedures were repeated. RESULTS: At baseline, all three patients had discontinuous antegrade atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction, but very poor (two patients) or absent (one patient) ventriculo atrial conduction prevented induction of AVNRT. During infusion of isoproterenol, retrograde conduction was enhanced so that 1:1 retrograde occurred to cycle lengths of 300, 340 and 260 ms. AVNRT was then inducible in all patients, reproducing their clinical symptoms. CONCLUSION: Absent or poor ventriculo-atrial conduction in patients with suspected AV node reentry does not preclude the development of tachycardia with sympathomimetic enhancement. Isoproterenol should be given to attempt reversal of retrograde block in these patients.     

Effects on cardiac performance of atrioventricular node catheter ablation using radiofrequency current for drug-refractory atrial arrhythmias

Patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF) are candidates for radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the atrioventricular (AV) node with the aim being to control heart rate. As patients with AF can have markedly impaired ventricular function, information concerning the hemodynamic effects of AV node ablation using RF current would be valuable. Fourteen consecutive patients (mean age 65 +/- 3 years) with drug-resistant AF underwent AV node catheter ablation with RF current and had permanent pacemaker implantation. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) by two-dimensional echocardiography immediately before ablation was 42 +/- 3% (range 14%-54%) and their mean exercise time was 4.4 +/- 0.4 minutes. Complete AV block was achieved in all 14 patients with 6 +/- 2 RF applications (range 1-18). There was no evidence of any acute cardiodepressant effect associated with delivery of RF current, and EF 3 days after ablation was 44 +/- 4%. By 6 weeks after ablation, the left ventricular EF was significantly improved compared to baseline (47 +/- 4% postablation vs 42 +/- 3% preablation; P < 0.05), and this modest increase in EF was accompanied by an improvement in exercise time (5.4 +/- 0.4 min). In conclusion, delivery of RF current for AV node catheter ablation in patients with AF and reduced ventricular function is not associated with any acute cardiodepressant effect. On the contrary, improved control of rapid heart rate following successful AV node ablation is associated with a modest and progressive improvement in cardiac performance.     

Randomized comparison of anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches to ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare in random fashion an anatomic and an electrogram mapping approach for ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia. BACKGROUND: Ablation of the slow pathway in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia can be performed by using either an anatomic or an electrogram mapping approach to identify target sites for ablation. These two approaches have never been compared prospectively. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with typical AV node reentrant tachycardia were randomly assigned to undergo either an anatomic or an electrogram mapping approach for ablation of the slow AV node pathway. In 25 patients randomly assigned to the anatomic approach, sequential radiofrequency energy applications were delivered along the tricuspid annulus from the level of the coronary sinus ostium to the His bundle position. In 25 patients assigned to the electrogram mapping approach, target sites along the posteromedial tricuspid annulus near the coronary sinus ostium were sought where there was a multicomponent atrial electrogram or evidence of a possible slow pathway potential. If the initial approach was ineffective after 12 radiofrequency energy applications, the alternative approach was then used. RESULTS: The anatomic approach was effective in 21 (84%) of 25 patients, and the electrogram mapping approach was effective in all 25 patients (100%) randomly assigned to this technique (p = 0.1). The four patients with an ineffective anatomic approach had a successful outcome with the electrogram mapping approach. On the basis of intention to treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the electrogram mapping approach and the anatomic approach with respect to the time required for ablation (28 +/- 21 and 31 +/- 31 min, respectively, mean +/- SD, p = 0.7) duration of fluoroscopic exposure (27 +/- 20 and 27 +/- 18 min, respectively, p = 0.9) or mean number of radiofrequency applications delivered (6.3 +/- 3.9 vs. 7.2 +/- 8.0, p = 0.6). With both the anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches, the atrial electrogram duration and number of peaks in the atrial electrogram were significantly greater at successful target sites than at unsuccessful target sites. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches for ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway are comparable in efficacy and duration. If the anatomic approach is initially attempted and fails, the electrogram mapping approach may be successful at sites outside the areas targeted in the anatomic approach. With both the anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches, there are significant differences in the atrial electrogram configuration between successful and unsuccessful target sites.