Sequential changes of esophageal motility after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy or variceal ligation for esophageal variceal bleeding: a scintigraphic study

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and variceal ligation are two popular endoscopic methods used to treat esophageal variceal hemorrhage. These two methods have not been compared with regard to esophageal dysfunction after treatment. This is a prospective investigation of esophageal dysmotility after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and variceal ligation. METHODS: Sequential changes of esophageal motility after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (n = 25) and variceal ligation (n = 25) were investigated in 50 cirrhotic patients with recent variceal bleeding. Another 22 cirrhotics without esophageal varices were included as controls. Radionuclide esophageal transit tests were performed before initial endoscopic treatment, and 1 and 3 months after variceal eradication. RESULTS: The baseline esophageal transit time was longer in both the sclerotherapy (n = 25, 7.8 +/- 1.4 s) and ligation groups (n = 25, 8.2 +/- 1.8 s) than in controls (n = 22, 6.7 +/- 0.7 s, p < 0.005). The transit time was longer in patients with large varices than in those with small varices (8.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.7 s, p < 0.05). In the sclerotherapy group, the transit time was prolonged 1 month after variceal eradication, compared with its pretreatment state (n = 20, 7.6 +/- 1.5 vs. 10.0 +/- 2.2 s, p < 0.0001) but was shortened at 3 months compared with 1 month after variceal eradication (n = 12, 10.7 +/- 1.5 vs. 8.6 +/- 2.2 s, p < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that the number of treatment sessions required to eradicate varices was the only significant factor associated with prolonged transit time (p < 0.05). In the ligation group, the transit time changed little at 1 month or 3 months after variceal eradication. CONCLUSIONS: Impairment of esophageal motility can be significant with endoscopic injection sclerotherapy but is reversible. However, endoscopic variceal ligation exerts no significant impact on esophageal motility.     

Transabdominal extensive oesophagogastric devascularization with gastro-oesophageal stapling in the management of acute variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND: Operation is required for patients with portal hypertension who have failed to respond to emergency sclerotherapy for control of acute variceal bleeding. This study evaluates the role of transabdominal extensive oesophagogastric devascularization combined with gastro-oesophageal stapling for control of acute variceal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension of different aetiologies. METHODS: Transabdominal extensive oesophagogastric devascularization combined with gastrooesophageal stapling was performed in 65 patients (28 with cirrhosis, 17 with non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis and 20 with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction) in whom emergency endoscopic sclerotherapy, and/or pharmacotherapy and balloon tamponade had failed. The Sugiura procedure was modified to minimize operating time and to reduce the operative difficulties due to oesophageal wall necrosis after sclerotherapy. RESULTS: The operative mortality rate was higher in patients with cirrhosis (P = 0.0003); sepsis was the leading cause of death (in nine of 18). A high mortality rate (12 of 15) was seen in patients with Child grade C cirrhosis. Control of bleeding was achieved in all patients. The procedure-related complication rate was 17 per cent with a 6 per cent oesophageal leak rate; four of 47 surviving patients developed oesophageal stricture. During a mean follow-up of 33 months, residual varices, recurrent varices and rebleeding were seen in three, two and three of 47 survivors. CONCLUSION: Transabdominal extensive oesophagogastric devascularization combined with gastrooesophageal stapling is an effective and safe procedure for control of acute variceal haemorrhage with satisfactory long-term control, especially in patients without cirrhosis and low-risk patients with cirrhosis.     

Anti-inflammatory drugs and variceal bleeding: a case-control study

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can have severe gastrointestinal effects and cause peptic ulcers to bleed. Acute bleeding from oesophageal varices is a major complication of cirrhosis of the liver. AIMS: To investigate the role, using a case-control study, of NSAIDs in first bleeding episodes associated with oesophageal or cardial varices in cirrhotic patients. Patients/METHODS: A structured interview was conducted of 125 cirrhotic patients with bleeding mainly related to oesophageal varices and 75 cirrhotic controls with oesophageal varices who had never bled. RESULTS: Cirrhotic patients who were admitted for bleeding related to portal hypertension were more likely to have used NSAIDs during the week before the index day (31 of 125 (25%)) than the cirrhotic controls (eight of 75 (11%); odds ratio = 2.8, p = 0.016). Use of aspirin alone or combined with other NSAIDs was also more prevalent in the cases (21 of 125 (17%)) than in the controls (three of 75 (4%); odds ratio = 4.9, p = 0.007). Logistic regression analysis showed that NSAID use (p = 0.022, odds ratio = 2. 9, 95% confidence interval = 1.8 to 4.7) and variceal size (p<0.001, odds ratio = 4.0, 95% confidence interval = 1.4 to 11.5) were the only variables independently associated with the risk of bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin, used alone or combined with other NSAIDs, was associated with a first variceal bleeding episode in patients with cirrhosis. Given the life threatening nature of this complication, the possible benefit of this treatment should be weighed against the risk shown here. No firm conclusions could be drawn on non-aspirin NSAIDs used alone.     

Prevalence of hypothalamic-pituitary imaging abnormalities in impotent men with secondary hypogonadism

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Combining endoscopic sclerotherapy with ligation has been proposed to hasten variceal eradication. A randomized trial was performed comparing combination ligation plus sclerotherapy with ligation alone in patients with major bleeding from esophageal varices. METHODS: Forty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive ligation or ligation plus 1 mL 1.5% tetradecyl injected just above each band. Treatment was repeated weekly until varices were eradicated. Repeat endoscopy was performed for rebleeding and every 3 months after eradication. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between combined therapy and ligation in rebleeding (29% vs. 30%), blood transfused (3.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.8 U), hospital days (9.3 +/- 2.1 vs. 7.5 +/- 1.2), complications (29% vs. 10%), or deaths (14% vs. 15%) during a mean follow-up period of 28 weeks. Combined therapy required significantly more sessions to achieve eradication (4.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.4) and greater time per treatment session (18.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 13.3 +/- 0.5 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Combined ligation plus sclerotherapy does not reduce the number of treatment sessions required for variceal eradication as compared with ligation alone. Combined therapy lengthens the time required for treatment without improving efficacy or decreasing complications. Thus, combined ligation and sclerotherapy should not be used to treat patients with bleeding esophageal varices.     

Nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate compared with sclerotherapy for the prevention of variceal rebleeding

BACKGROUND: Patients who have bleeding from esophageal varices are at high risk for rebleeding and death. We compared the efficacy and safety of endoscopic sclerotherapy with the efficacy and safety of nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate for the prevention of variceal rebleeding. METHODS: Eighty-six hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and bleeding from esophageal varices diagnosed by endoscopy were randomly assigned to treatment with repeated sclerotherapy (43 patients) or nadolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate (43 patients). The primary outcomes were rebleeding, death, and complications. The hepatic venous pressure gradient was measured at base line and after three months. RESULTS: Base-line data were similar in the two groups, and the median follow-up was 18 months in both. Eleven patients in the medication group and 23 in the sclerotherapy group had rebleeding. The actuarial probability of remaining free of rebleeding was higher in the medication group for all episodes related to portal hypertension (P = 0.001) and variceal rebleeding (P = 0.002). Four patients in the medication group and nine in the sclerotherapy group died (P = 0.07 for the difference in the actuarial probability of survival). Seven patients in the medication group and 16 in the sclerotherapy group had treatment-related complications (P = 0.03). Thirty-one patients in the medication group underwent two hemodynamic studies; 1 of the 13 patients with more than a 20 percent decrease in the hepatic venous pressure gradient had rebleeding, as compared with 8 of the 18 with smaller decreases in the pressure gradient (P = 0.04) for the actuarial probability of rebleeding at two years). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with sclerotherapy, nadolol plus isosorbide mononitrate significantly decreased the risk of rebleeding from esophageal varices.     

Longterm outcome after injection sclerotherapy for oesophageal varices in children with extrahepatic portal hypertension

A consecutive series of 36 children with bleeding from oesophageal varices secondary to extrahepatic portal hypertension was successfully treated by endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and followed up over a mean period of 8.7 years after variceal obliteration. There were no deaths from portal hypertension or its treatment and morbidity related to oesophageal sclerotherapy was minimal. Endoscopic injection sclerotherapy alone proved safe and effective in controlling variceal bleeding from portal hypertension in over 80% of the children. Recurrent variceal bleeding developed in 10 (31%) patients but half of these were effectively treated by further sclerotherapy. Gastric variceal bleeding unresponsive to sclerotherapy necessitated successful portosystemic shunt surgery in four (13%) patients. Two children required splenectomy for painful splenomegaly. In most children injection sclerotherapy is the best treatment for the primary management of bleeding oesophageal varices, reserving portosystemic shunting or other surgical procedures for those with bleeding from gastrointestinal varices.     

Sclerotherapy versus sclerotherapy and propranolol in the prevention of rebleeding from oesophageal varices: a randomised study

BACKGROUND: This trial was carried out to assess the value of propranolol in the prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding when combined with longterm endoscopic sclerotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred patients (161 male, 39 female, age range 20-68 years) with portal hypertension resulting mainly from schistosomal periportal fibrosis or posthepatitic cirrhosis presenting with their first episode of haematemesis or melena, or both were included. This was confirmed endoscopically to result from ruptured oesophageal varices. After initial control of bleeding, patients were randomised into two groups: group 1 treated with endoscopic sclerotherapy alone and group 2 treated with sclerotherapy plus propranolol. They were followed up for two years. RESULTS: Group (2) had a lower rebleeding rate (14.3% v 38.6% in group 1), lower variceal recurrence after obliteration (17% v 34% in group 1), longer period between variceal obliteration and recurrence (36 weeks v 21 weeks in group 1); but no change in mortality (12% in both groups). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with sclerotherapy should be given propranolol for longterm management.     

Medical prophylaxis of haemorrhage from oesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis

Haemorrhage from oesophageal varices is a life-threatening event in patients with liver cirrhosis. About 40-80% of patients surviving the first bleeding suffer a recurrence within 1 year. This high recurrence rate substantially contributes to the mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Therefore, various treatment regimens in both primary and secondary prophylaxis were studied. Most experience in medical primary prophylaxis was collected with beta-blockers, mainly propranolol. Treating patients with oesophageal varices with propranolol significantly reduces the incidence of first variceal bleeding. However, the effect on mortality is marginal, and primary prophylaxis is generally not recommended in these patients. Several studies support the hypothesis that medical prophylaxis with beta-blockers is more effective in reducing the rate of first oesophageal bleeding in patients with a high risk of haemorrhage, such as those with very large varices with red spots. A score to assess an individual patient's risk of variceal bleeding would be helpful, but until such a score has been validated, no general rule for this treatment decision can be given. In secondary prophylaxis, both beta-blockers and endoscopic therapy (sclerotherapy or ligation of the varices) are effective in lowering the rate of rebleeding. However, the effect on mortality was not significant in most studies. Several studies comparing the efficacy of medical prophylaxis and endoscopic treatment showed advantages of the endoscopic therapy with a greater reduction in recurrent bleeding episodes. However, medical prophylaxis with beta-blockers has the important advantage of being immediately effective, whereas endoscopic procedures provide the best protection against recurrent bleeding after complete obliteration of the varices. Therefore, in the first weeks and months of endoscopic therapy, additional treatment with beta-blockers may further reduce the risk of rebleeding. Only half of all studies on this topic reported a significant advantage with this combined therapy. Therefore, it seems reasonable to restrict this approach to patients with a high risk of rebleeding, such as patients with large sclerotherapy-derived oesophageal ulcers.     

A prospective randomized trial comparing somatostatin and sclerotherapy in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding

Somatostatin and endoscopic sclerotherapy are widely used in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding. Although objective evidence does exist about the advantages of either treatment, data comparing both procedures are scarce. In order to compare the effectiveness and safety of somatostatin and sclerotherapy in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding, 70 consecutive cirrhotic patients suffering from esophageal variceal hemorrhage and meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to treatment with somatostatin (35 patients) or sclerotherapy (35 patients). No differences in age, sex, alcohol intake, etiology of cirrhosis and severity of liver failure were found between groups. Failure of treatment (defined as persistence of bleeding despite therapy or subsequent rebleeding within the 48-hr trial period) occurred in seven patients (20%) in the somatostatin group and in six (17.1%) in the sclerotherapy group (NS). Early rebleeding occurred in seven of 28 patients (25%) in the somatostatin group and in five of 29 (17.2%) in the sclerotherapy group (NS). Mortality within the first 6 wk was no different between both groups: 10 (28.5%) and eight (22.8%) in the somatostatin and sclerotherapy groups, respectively. Sclerotherapy, but not somatostatin, was associated with major complications in five cases (14.2%) (p = 0.026), two of which resulted in patient's death. These results suggest that somatostatin is safer, and as effective as sclerotherapy, in controlling acute variceal bleeding until an elective treatment can be established.     

Sclerotherapy versus ligation in hemorrhage caused by rupture of esophageal varices. Direct meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVES: To compare the advantages of endoscopic ligation and endoscopic sclerotherapy for bleeding esophageal varices, published randomized clinical trials were critically reviewed by meta-analysis. Only ten clinical trials concerning a history of recent or active bleeding esophageal varices were included. METHODS: The methodology, population, treatment and outcomes of each relevant trial were evaluated by duplicate independent review. RESULTS: Endoscopic sclerotherapy compared to banding ligation significantly increased the rate of rebleeding (OR: 1.6; 95% IC: 1.1-2.3) without increasing early mortality compared to endoscopic banding ligation (OR: 1.3; 95% IC: 0.8-1.9). The rate of varice eradication associated with these two types of treatment was not different (OR: 0.9; 95% IC: 0.6-1.3) but was obtained more quickly with endoscopic banding ligation (3.8 +/- 1.6 versus 5.8 +/- 2.2; P < 0.05). The rate of complications was higher after sclerotherapy (OR: 2.5; 95% IC: 1.7-3.7), in those cases with a positive heterogeneity test. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows a lower morbidity with endoscopic banding ligation in patients with variceal hemorrhage. The most important advantage of endoscopic banding ligation was the reduction of the rate of rebleeding.     

Endoscopic variceal ligation in prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high-risk esophageal varices

To determine the efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) in prophylaxis on the rate of first esophageal variceal bleeding, we conducted a prospective, randomized trial in 126 cirrhotic patients with no history of previous upper gastrointestinal bleeding and with esophageal varices endoscopically judged to be at high risk of hemorrhage. The end-points of the study were bleeding and death. Life-table curves showed that prophylactic EVL significantly diminished the rate of variceal hemorrhage (12/62 [19%] vs. 38/64 [60%]; P = .0001) and overall mortality (17/62 [28%] vs. 37/64 [58%]; P = .0011). The 2-year cumulative bleeding rate was 19% (12/ 62) in the EVL group and 60% (38/64) in the control group. The 2-year cumulative mortality rate was 28% (17/62) in the EVL group and 58% (37/64) in the control group. Comparison of Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to death of both groups showed significantly lower mortality in the ligation group (P = .001). Patients undergoing EVL had few treatment failures and died mainly of hepatic failure. The lower risk in the EVL group was attributed to a rapid reduction of variceal size. Prophylactic EVL was more efficient in preventing first bleeding in patients with good condition (Child A) than in those with decompensated disease (Child B and C). We conclude that prophylactic EVL can decrease the incidence of first variceal bleeding and death over a period of 2 years in cirrhotic patients with high-risk esophageal varices.     

Endoscopic variceal ligation. Experience in 78 patients

Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is a new alternative to sclerotherapy in the treatment of esophageal variceal hemorrhage, which results in strangulation, necrosis and scar formation of varices without systemic or local adverse effect. From May 1, 1991 through July 1, 1992, EVL was performed in 78 consecutive patients, in 35 of them it was performed during active massive bleeding, and active bleeding was controlled by the initial session in 31 patients. With repeated EVL treatment, 32 patients had their varices obliterated. The varices had reduced in size in other patients. No ligation-related complications were observed. This procedure is a safe, effective and rather simple method to treat esophageal varices, especially in patients with poor liver function and recurrent bleeding after devascularization or shunt surgery.     

Randomised trial of octreotide for long term management of cirrhosis after variceal haemorrhage

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of long term octreotide as adjuvant treatment to programmed endoscopic sclerotherapy after acute variceal haemorrhage in cirrhotic portal hypertension. DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECTS: 32 patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension. INTERVENTIONS: Programmed injection sclerotherapy with subcutaneous octreotide 50 micrograms twice daily for 6 months, or programmed injection sclerotherapy alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Episodes of recurrent variceal bleeding and survival. RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients receiving combined octreotide and sclerotherapy had episodes of recurrent variceal bleeding compared with patients given sclerotherapy alone (1/16 v 7/16; P = 0.037, Fisher's exact test), and their survival was significantly improved (P < 0.02, log rank test); this improvement was maintained for 12 months after the end of the study. Combined treatment also resulted in a sustained decrease in portal pressure (median decrease -6.0 mm Hg, interquartile range -10 to -4.75 mm Hg, P = 0.0002) compared with sclerotherapy alone (median increase 1.5 mm Hg, interquartile range 0.25 to 3.25 mm Hg), as well as a significant improvement in liver function as assessed by plasma concentrations of bilirubin, albumin, and alanine aminotransferase and by hepatocyte metabolism of aminopyrine labelled with carbon-14. CONCLUSION: Long term octreotide may be a valuable adjuvant to endoscopic sclerotherapy for acute variceal haemorrhage in cirrhotic portal hypertension.     

Bivalent hapten-bearing peptides designed for iodine-131 pretargeted radioimmunotherapy

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared vasoactive drugs with endoscopic sclerotherapy in the control of acute variceal haemorrhage. Octreotide is widely used for this purpose, but its value remains undetermined. AIMS: To compare octreotide with endoscopic sclerotherapy for acute variceal haemorrhage. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with acute variceal haemorrhage. METHODS: Patients were randomised at endoscopy to receive either a 48 hour intravenous infusion of 50 pg/h octreotide (n = 73), or emergency sclerotherapy (n = 77). RESULTS: Overall control of bleeding and mortality was not significantly different between octreotide (85%, 62 patients) and sclerotherapy (82%, 63 patients) over the 48 hour trial period (relative risk of rebleeding 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38 to 1.82), irrespective of Child's grading or active bleeding at endoscopy. One major complication was observed in the sclerotherapy group (aspiration) and two in the octreotide group (pulmonary oedema, severe paralytic ileus). During 60 days of follow up there was an overall trend towards an increased mortality in the octreotide group which was not statistically significant (relative risk of dying at 60 days 1.91, 95% CI 0.97 to 3.78, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that intravenous octreotide is as effective as injection sclerotherapy in the control of acute variceal bleeding, but further controlled trials are necessary to evaluate the safety of this treatment.     

The Saeed Six-Shooter: a prospective study of a new endoscopic multiple rubber-band ligator for the treatment of varices

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Rubber-band ligation is superior to sclerotherapy, and is considered to be the endoscopic treatment of choice for bleeding varices. The single-shot mechanism of the ligation device generally used is inherently inefficient, and makes the procedure tedious. It also requires overtube placement, associated with discomfort and complications. This study describes the Saeed Six-Shooter, a multiple ligation device. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients with variceal bleeding were prospectively studied. After initial endoscopic ligation, subsequent sessions were every 7-10 days. The parameters studied were the ease of use, the ability to control active bleeding and eradicate varices, survival, and complications. RESULTS: Active bleeding was controlled in all seven (100%) patients. Esophageal varices were eradicated in 70% (3.2 +/- 1.2 sessions), and gastric varices in 88% of patients (2 +/- 1.2 sessions). Five patients re-bled, two from esophageal varices, two from gastric varices, and one from treatment-induced ulcer. There were four deaths, none due to exsanguination. A single complication, esophageal stricture, resolved with balloon dilation. Intubation was no more difficult with the endoscope loaded with the Six-Shooter than with the endoscope alone (P > 0.3). Six ligations were performed in 39% of cases within 60 seconds, and in 74% of cases within 90 seconds. For gastric varices, the device was effectively used with the endoscope retroflexed. CONCLUSIONS: The Saeed Six-Shooter is a safe and efficient instrument for the endoscopic ligation of varices, and has overcome the limitations of the single-shot ligator.     

Management of esophageal varices in children by endoscopic variceal ligation

Endoscopic variceal sclerotherapy (EVS) has been considered the mainstay of therapy for bleeding esophageal varices in adults. However, recent data have shown that endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is just as efficacious and has fewer complications than EVS. Although there are many reports concerning EVL in adults, only a few studies have been done in children. This report describes experience with EVL in 22 children with esophageal variceal hemorrhage. Eighty-seven EVL procedures were performed during a 9-year period in 22 children. The causes of portal hypertension were biliary atresia (10), portal vein thrombosis (8), chronic active hepatitis (1), cirrhosis secondary to cystic fibrosis (2), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (1). The age range at the onset of variceal bleeding was 8 months to 19 years. Twelve patients had EVS before EVL treatment was begun. Distal esophageal varices (one to four per session) were mechanically ligated using an elastic band ligature device attached to a flexible endoscope. The aim of therapy was obliteration of distal esophageal varices by EVL, every 2 to 4 weeks, until eradication. Subsequent EVL was dictated by the status of the varices. Outcome was assessed with respect to survival, rebleeding, status of varices, and complications. The patients underwent a mean of four sessions of EVL (range, one to eight). Four patients subsequently underwent liver transplantation. Of the 18 patients remaining (average follow-up period, 5.3 years), 12 had their varices eradicated (average of four EVL sessions), four are still in treatment, one has not been evaluated in the past 4 years, and one died of liver failure. Complications included bleeding between sessions (6 patients), cervical esophageal perforation (1 patient), and transient fever (2 patients). No child has experienced symptoms of esophageal stenosis or gastroesophageal reflux. Two patients died of liver disease, unrelated to bleeding from portal hypertension. EVL is effective in controlling variceal hemorrhage in children with portal hypertension, regardless of etiology. The complication rate is low, and EVL is an acceptable and perhaps preferable alternative to EVS in children with esophageal varices.     

Guidance of intracoronary radiation therapy based on dose-volume histograms derived from quantitative intravascular ultrasound

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The risk factors for esophageal variceal rebleeding are little known. Variceal pressure is one of the major determinants of variceal rupture, but the relationship between variceal pressure and variceal rebleeding during maintenance sclerotherapy has not been determined. This study was undertaken to evaluate the relationship between variceal pressure/gradient change and variceal rebleeding during maintenance sclerotherapy. METHODS: Patients with liver cirrhosis and recent esophageal variceal hemorrhage underwent consecutive variceal pressure measurements by direct puncture of the varices before each elective sclerotherapy. RESULTS: In 46 patients, the initial variceal pressure was no different regardless of age, sex, underlying etiology or hepatic reserve. Variceal pressure was higher in large varices, varices with more severe red wale markings, and varices with slower reduction in size during maintenance sclerotherapy. A larger volume of sclerosant was required to eradicate large varices, varices with more severe red wale markings, and varices with slower reduction in size during maintenance sclerotherapy. There was a positive correlation between initial variceal pressure and total amount of sclerosant (r=0.485, p=0.001). Initial variceal pressure was not related to rebleeding. Variceal pressure increased more in patients with rebleeding from varices per se (n=7) than in those without rebleeding (n= 24). There was no difference in pressure change between patients without rebleeding (n=24) and those with rebleeding from variceal ulcers (n=7). CONCLUSIONS: Large varices, severe red color signs and slow reduction in variceal size were associated with higher initial variceal pressure, and more sclerosant was required to eradicate the varices. An increase in variceal pressure during maintenance sclerotherapy indicates a higher risk of variceal rebleeding, but not of variceal ulcer rebleeding.     

Endoscopic ligation with elastic bands in the prevention of hemorrhage recurrence caused by esophageal varices. Study of 45 patients

The aim of the present study was to determine the usefulness of elastic band ligation in the prevention of hemorrhage recurrence by esophageal varices. Forty-five patients without known hepatocarcinoma who had survived a hemorrhagic variceal episode were included in the study. Seventeen patients (38%) were Child-Pugh A, 22 (49%) B, and 6 (13%) C, with the hepatitis C virus and alcohol being the etiology of cirrosis in 55 and 20% of the cases, respectively. The first ligation session was performed between the third and fifth days after the hemorrhagic episode and the posterior sessions were carried out at intervals of 2-4 weeks. The ligation sessions were performed without antibiotic prophylaxis and with placement of an overtube. A mean of 4 +/- 2 bands were placed per session (range, 1-8) and the mean number of sessions required per patient to achieve erradication of the varices was 3.5 +/- 1.5 (range, 2-8). The rate of bleeding recurrence was 17.7% (9 episodes, five by variceal rupture and four by ulcer secondary to ligation). All the episodes of bleeding recurrence occurred between the sessions, with the mortality being 11% (5/45 patients). In the 40 remaining patients the varices were erradicated although 19 (47.5%) required one or two additional sessions of sclerotherapy. The accumulated percentage of patients free of bleeding recurrence was 82% during a mean follow-up of 10.2 +/- 6.7 months. Ten lesions of dislaceration of the esophageal mucosa caused by placement of the were observed overtube. In conclusion, endoscopic elastic band ligation is a useful technique for the erradication of esophageal varices an in the prevention of bleeding recurrence.     

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Treatment of patients with recurrent bleeding from esophageal varices

We report the results of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure in six patients with liver cirrhosis and recurrent bleeding or acute intractable bleeding from oesophageal varices in spite of multiple sessions of sclerotherapy. Median follow-up was 15 months (range 1-24 months). The procedure was technically successful in all patients without procedure-related morbidity or mortality. Four of the procedures were performed electively and two as an emergency procedure. The portosystemic pressure gradient decreased to below 12 mmHg following TIPS implantation and the shunt bloodflow was one quarter to three-quarters of the portal bloodflow determined by Doppler ultrasound. Recurrent bleeding occurred in one patient but was amenable to endoscopic sclerotherapy. In this patient the shunt had developed a stenosis that was treated by balloondilatation and insertion of an additional stent six months following the initial procedure, and no further bleeding occurred. The remaining five patients had no rebleeding episodes. Repeated Doppler examinations in the followup period demonstrated patency of all shunts. None of the patients developed portosystemic encephalopathy. One patient died of cerebral haemorrhage, unrelated to TIPS, 16 months following implantation. Another patient died 14 months following TIPS due to acute mesenteric occlusion and septicaemia. We conclude that TIPS is feasible and effective in selected patients with liver cirrhosis and persistent or recurrent variceal bleeding following repeated endoscopic therapy.     

Prophylactic endoscopic sclerosing treatment of the esophageal wall in varices -- a prospective controlled randomized trial

From January 1, 1978 to January 1, 1980 a controlled randomized trial comparing conservative treatment with prophylactic sclerotherapy of esophageal varices prior to hemorrhage was carried out. In all 71 patients liver cirrhosis was histologically confirmed. The two randomly assigned groups were comparable. Indications of endoscopic treatment were the existence of varices III-IV bearing erosions, varices II-IV without erosions but coagulation factors below 30%, or both. Six patients left the trial. In group Ia -- treatment by conservative means -- a high rate of variceal bleeding and death was observed. Comparing these results with those of group Ib treated by sclerotherapy, bleeding and death rates were found to be highly significantly lower. -- Thus the investigated criteria for predicting a recent variceal hemorrhage are confirmed. Prophylactic sclerotherapy in esophageal varices with erosions and/or poor coagulation reserve of the liver can largely prevent an esophageal hemorrhage from varices, and prolongs the life of these chronically ill patients.