Estrogen-replacement therapy in younger women with breast cancer

Approximately 25% of breast cancers occur in premenopausal women. In addition to local therapy, surgery or surgery plus irradiation, systemic chemotherapy administration has become the standard of care for all node-positive and many node-negative patients. Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy can result in ovarian dysfunction or failure. This renders many women prematurely estrogen deficient. The consequences of menopause, genitourinary atrophy, bone loss, and increased risk of cardiovascular disease, have not been routinely assessed in clinical trials. The risks of estrogen deficiency have not been assessed in comparison to improved disease-free and overall survival benefits of adjuvantly treated premenopausal breast cancer patients. Estrogen-replacement therapy in postmenopausal women has been shown to prevent osteoporosis and reduce fracture risk. The majority of studies also show a marked reduction in cardiovascular disease and mortality. Estrogen-replacement therapy has been considered a disease-prevention strategy rather than a therapeutic intervention. The risks and benefits of estrogen-replacement therapy in women with primary breast cancer are unknown. It is unknown how the well-known benefits accrued from reduction in skeletal and cardiovascular morbidity/mortality compare with the potential risks of increased breast cancer morbidity/mortality. Carefully designed prospective clinical trials with well-defined objectives and endpoints are required to learn if more harm than good is done by the withholding of estrogen therapy in breast cancer patients.     

Hormone replacement therapy after treatment of breast carcinoma

A correct Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) guarantees a successful treatment of subjective symptoms of oestrogen deficiency and an efficient prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, of cardiovascular diseases and of M. Alzheimer. In non-substituted postmenopausal women, the risk to die from a myocardial infarction is ten times higher than the risk to die from a carcinoma of the breast or the consequences of a fracture of the femoral neck. In spite of this observation, the acceptance is still insufficient because of an unjustified fear of hormone-induced carcinomas. The incidence of a carcinoma of the breast is not higher in women profiting of a HRT by a correct combination of an oestrogen and a progestogen administered up to 5 years than in untreated controls. Although some but not all authors suspect a slight increase of the relative risk of a carcinoma of the breast to approximately 1.5 after > or = 10 years of HRT, the overall mortality of substituted women is clearly inferior to the one of a non-substituted population. However, the final goal of HRT is not prolongation of life, but a better quality of life. Quality of life is often miserable in women treated for breast cancer. The final answer to the question if women after treatment of breast cancer should be allowed to profit of HRT is still open because formal evidence is missing. However, a woman should not be denied HRT if she lived two years without relapse since her primary cancer and if she does not belong to the subgroup where adjuvant treatment by tamoxifen is appropriate. In the future, selective oestrogen receptor modulators may be used in women after breast cancer.     

Age-related deterioration in arterial structure and function in postmenopausal women: impact of hormone replacement therapy

Epidemiological evidence suggests that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) reduces morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases in postmenopausal women. In this study, indices of arterial function [total systemic arterial compliance (SAC) and carotid arterial distensibility coefficient (DC)], structure [carotid intima-media thickness (IMT)], and lipid profiles were compared in postmenopausal women on long-term HRT and aged-matched controls. One hundred nine women aged 44 to 77 years taking HRT and an age-matched group of 108 female controls were entered into the study. The two groups were similar for body mass index, smoking status, exercise level, alcohol intake, and blood pressure. Fasting cholesterol, low density lipoprotein, and lipoprotein(a) were reduced and high density lipoprotein increased in the HRT group. IMT increased with age; SAC and DC were reduced with age in both groups. The HRT group had a higher mean SAC (0.42+/-0.02 versus 0.34+/-0.02 U/mm Hg, P=0.0001) and a lower mean IMT (0.67+/-0.01 versus 0.74+/-0.02 mm, P=0.006) than did controls. Subgroup analysis for estrogen versus estrogen plus progestin revealed no differences for SAC and IMT; DC, however, was greater in estrogen-only users. Smokers on HRT had a higher mean SAC (0.41+/-0.02 versus 0.31+/-0.01 U/mm Hg, P=0.008) and a lower IMT (0.65+/-0.02 versus 0.75+/-0.03 mm, P=0.002) than did smokers not taking such therapy. A protective effect of long-term estrogen therapy on age-related changes in arterial structure and function in postmenopausal women was evident in smokers and nonsmokers alike. Progestin appeared to counteract the effects of estrogen on carotid compliance only. Long-term controlled trials are needed to determine the significance of these findings.     

Estrogen replacement to women treated for endometrial cancer

Oestrogen replacement therapy in women treated for endometrial cancer has long been considered contra-indicated. Based on a review of the literature, which shows a low risk of recurrence during oestrogen replacement therapy in women treated for low-risk endometrial cancer, we advocate that this group of patients could be offered oestrogen replacement therapy and be provided with the benefits of prevention of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. Further studies are needed to investigate the survival and recurrence rates of high-risk patients treated with oestrogen replacement therapy.     

The menopause and the cardiovascular system

Combining the wealth of epidemiological, metabolic and recent mechanistic data, it would appear biologically plausible that HRT, either oestrogen alone or in combination with progestogen, is cardioprotective. Further research is required, as information is lacking on cardiovascular effects of HRT instigated at an older age. There is a need to identify cardiovascular benefit, indirect and/or direct, of combined oestrogen/progestogen therapy using randomized trials. The various progestogen types and doses also need to be investigated. Studies are also required to investigate the effect of HRT use in higher risk patients with established CVD. There is scant information on the effect of HRT on blood pressure of patients with hypertension. Cardiovascular risk factor profiles and incidence surveys need to be conducted in developing countries to characterize their female population and to identify the prevalence of CVD; this needs to be undertaken before widespread recommendations on CVD prevention and the role of HRT can be made. If HRT is to be used effectively in the future treatment of heart disease in women these questions need to be addressed. At present HRT is indicated for the relief of menopausal symptoms and the prevention of osteoporosis. In women without these indications, ORT may be recommended in those who have had a premature menopause, and possibly in those who have established CHD or who are at high risk of developing CHD. It is too early to suggest a blanket recommendation for the use of HRT in the treatment of the symptoms of women with established CVD, but HRT after the menopause may at least be safely used in the secondary prevention of CHD.     

Hormone replacement therapy and hemostasis: principles of a complex interaction

Postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have been shown to be at reduced risk of arterial thrombotic disease. The risk of venous thrombosis appears not to be increased in HRT users in the absence of specific risk factors. However, while these data refer predominantly to women using conjugated equine estrogens, it is less clear whether the favourable impact on cardiovascular diseases may also be achieved by other preparations. Dose, as well as route of application and, particularly, the combination of steroids have been shown to affect both the clinical and the metabolic profile. With regard to cardiovascular diseases, differential effects on the hemostatic system are of particular interest. The principles of the interaction of steroids with the hemostatic system are reviewed. Also, the principal limitations of the assessment of the hemostatic system, as well as its interpretation, with regard to cardiovascular diseases are discussed. It is proposed to view the hemostatic system predominantly as a monitor of endothelial function rather than as a mediator of potential harmful effects on the cardiovascular system.     

Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer: revisiting the issues

OBJECTIVE: To assess current ideas about the benefits and risks of estrogen and hormone replacement therapy (ERT/HRT) in postmenopausal women. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE searches, supplemented by various texts, of the literature on HRT, ERT, and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): tamoxifen, toremifene, and raloxifene. DATA SYNTHESIS: HRT is primarily used for improving quality of life in women suffering from vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. HRT is beneficial in postmenopausal women for preventing cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of meta-analyses of clinical trials showed that ERT/HRT ever-users (patients who have ever used ERT/HRT) did not have an increased risk of breast cancer, but current users did have an increased risk, with some studies reporting increasing risk with duration of ERT. No relationship was found between dose or the addition of progestin to ERT and increased breast cancer risk. Overall breast cancer mortality rates associated with HRT were decreased in current users. In general, HRT does not increase the risk of breast cancer in women with a family history of the disease, compared with those without a family history. New HRT strategies that could potentially prevent breast cancer are now being developed. The SERMs tamoxifen and toremifene appear to have positive clinical effects on bone and serum lipids; they are currently being investigated for use as breast cancer chemopreventive agents. Raloxifene, a new SERM used for the prevention of osteoporosis, is an alternative for women who cannot tolerate HRT. Unfortunately, these SERMS have anti-estrogenic effects and thus cause vasomotor adverse effects such as hot flashes and vaginal dryness. In addition, SERMs do not protect against heart disease or prevent osteoporosis as well as does HRT. CONCLUSION: Presently, SERMs will not become first-line HRT, as the positive effects of ERT/HRT may outweigh any potentially increased risk of breast cancer. The development of new agents with pharmacodynamic profiles similar to that of ERT/HRT but lacking its adverse effects would be greatly beneficial for postmenopausal women.     

Estrogen replacement in women treated for breast cancer

Oestrogen replacement therapy in women with a history of breast cancer has long been considered contraindicated. However, the literature does not indicate an increased risk of recurrent breast cancer in postmenopausal women receiving oestrogen replacement therapy. We advocate that women with a history of breast cancer without nodal involvement could be offered oestrogen replacement therapy and thereby benefit from prevention of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. But the patients must accept a potentially increased risk of recurrence. We emphasize the need for randomized prospective studies.     

Selective estrogen receptor modulators as a new concept in preventing health risks of menopause

Long-term estrogen deficiency after menopause is responsible for different disorders, which not only make the quality of life in the older age worse but also are the major causes of women's mortality. It is especially the case for cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and dementia. The risk for these disorders can significantly be reduced by hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Unfortunately, the mean duration of the postmenopausal administration of HRT is too short to demonstrate its efficacy in preventing the mentioned diseases. In this review the new therapeutic possibilities are discussed, called selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs). These structurally heterogeneous compounds interact with estrogen receptors and act as either estrogen-agonists or--antagonists according to the type of organ and physiological context (i.e., dose, target tissue and hormone concentration in the tissue). The evaluation of the effects of these compounds led to the better understanding of both antiestrogens and the whole steroid signaling system. The research of the clinical properties of SERM showed their potential benefit in the long-term care of the women in their non-reproductive period of life and demonstrated the possibility to overcome some drawbacks of HRT.     

Hormone replacement therapy in women with breast cancer. Do the risks outweigh the benefits?

PURPOSE: To review critically the literature regarding effects of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT)/combined estrogen and progesterone replacement therapy (HRT) on the risk of breast cancer and on other health risks and benefits in postmenopausal women, with a focus on risks and benefits in women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer. METHOD: A literature search was conducted using Medline, Cancerline, and the bibliographies of reports published as of March 1995. All five published meta-analyses that examined the risk of breast cancer in relation to ERT/HRT in otherwise healthy women were critically reviewed. All known reports of women with a history of breast cancer given ERT/HRT subsequent to diagnosis and additional reports regarding the benefits of ERT/HRT were also reviewed. RESULTS: None of the five meta-analyses demonstrated a significantly increased risk of developing breast cancer in ever users compared with never users of ERT/HRT. Current use may be associated with a small increased risk. This increased risk should be balanced by the expected benefits of ERT/HRT on quality of life, bone metabolism, and cardiovascular function. Preliminary information does not suggest a major detrimental effect of ERT/HRT in women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer, but these reports include few women with limited follow-up data. There are no randomized trials in women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer. CONCLUSION: In healthy postmenopausal women, the benefits associated with ERT/HRT outweigh the risks. In women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer, the balance of risks and benefits should be explored in randomized controlled trials.     

Hormonal replacement therapy affects calcitonin gene-related peptide and atrial natriuretic peptide secretion in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: Menopause is associated with critical changes in the cardiovascular system, and the possible effect of hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) on these changes is under investigation. The aim of our study was to evaluate in postmenopausal women the effects of HRT and clonidine on the response of plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) to the upright posture test and the saline infusion test respectively. METHODS: CGRP and ANP levels were measured with specific radioimmunological assays and expressed in pmol/l (means +/- S.E.M). DESIGN: Postmenopausal women (age 46-53 years) (n = 18) were studied before and after 3 months of HRT (n = 13) or clonidine treatment (n = 5). RESULTS: After HRT or clonidine treatment plasma CGRP levels (14.9 +/- 1.6 and 15.9 +/- 3.8 pmol/l) were significantly higher than before (9.8 +/- 0.6 and 10.5 +/- 1.6 pmol/l) (P < 0.01). The assumption of upright posture caused no change in plasma CGRP levels before treatment, while after HRT, but not after clonidine treatment, an increase in plasma CGRP levels was observed (P < 0.01 at 5 and 20 min). Basal plasma ANP levels significantly decreased after both HRT and clonidine treatment (P < 0.01). In untreated women the saline infusion test did not induce any change in plasma ANP levels; a significant response to the test was restored after HRT but not after clonidine treatment (P < 0.01 at 90 and 120 min). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that some of the adaptive responses modified by menopausal changes are restored by HRT but not clonidine treatment, suggesting a modulatory role for sex steroid hormones in cardiovascular function and salt and water balance.     

Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on the lipoprotein profile in postmenopausal women with ESRD

BACKGROUND: Patients with ESRD have excessive cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In postmenopausal women with normal renal function, estrogen replacement therapy decreases cardiovascular mortality by 50%, in part because of their beneficial effects on the lipoprotein profile. Because of similarities in the lipoprotein profile between healthy, postmenopausal women, and women with ESRD, we examined the effects of estrogen replacement on lipoproteins in 11 postmenopausal women with ESRD. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study (8 week treatment arms) using 2 mg daily of oral, micronized estradiol, 11 postmenopausal women with ESRD were treated. Neither baseline lipid nor lipoprotein abnormalities were used as entry criteria for study participation. RESULTS: Blood estradiol levels were 19 +/- 4 with placebo and 194 +/- 67 pg/ml (P = 0.024) with estradiol treatment. Total HDL cholesterol concentrations increased from 52 +/- 19 mg/dl to 61 +/- 20 mg/dl (16%), with placebo and estradiol treatments, respectively (P = 0.002). Apolipoprotein A1 increased by 24.6% (P = 0.0002) with estradiol intervention. HDL2 concentrations were 19 +/- 13 with placebo and 24 +/- 16 with estradiol treatment (P = 0.046). There were no differences in total or LDL cholesterol, other lipoprotein fractions including Lp(a), and triglycerides with 2 mg daily estradiol treatment. No significant side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, using standard dosage regimens for estrogen replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with ESRD, HDL cholesterol is increased to an extent that would be expected to improve their cardiovascular risk profile. Further studies are needed to assess whether estrogen replacement therapy decreases the incidence or severity of cardiovascular disease in ESRD patients to a similar degree compared with other women.     

Bone marrow cell development and trabecular bone dynamics after ovariectomy in ddy mice

This review highlights recent progress in our understanding of the beneficial effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in cardiovascular disease (CVD). The fact that HRT is increasingly advocated has raised concern about possible adverse effects weighed against the potential benefits of HRT regimens. Both favourable and unfavourable effects of oestrogens and HRT regimens on CVD risk factors are increasingly recognized. Consequently, the picture on cardiovascular effects of oestrogen and HRT has become more complicated, and research in this field has extended to novel areas.     

The treatment of hypertension in women

More women than men eventually develop hypertension, but they suffer less cardiovascular damage as a consequence. Primary hypertension in women has a greater volume component, often related to commonly associated obesity. Most lifestyle modifications have more to offer women, but women respond in a similar manner to various antihypertensive drugs. However, women appear to receive less benefit from antihypertensive therapy, as measured by morbidity and mortality data in multiple large clinical trials. Women who take oral contraceptives typically have a small rise in blood pressure, and in a small percentage, the rise is sufficient to induce hypertension. The prevalence is likely lower with currently used low-dose estrogen formulations. The use of estrogen for postmenopausal replacement therapy almost never raises the blood pressure, so that concerns about hypertension should not interfere with the use of this valuable therapy.     

Mammography changes associated with hormone replacement therapy in post-menopausal patients

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in post-menopausal or ovariectomized women reduces mortality due to cardiovascular diseases, lowers morbidity due to osteoporosis and improves vasovagal symptoms. Long-term therapy, however, increase the risk of side-effects. HRT may decrease mammographic sensitivity, markedly increasing glandular density. Enlargement of pre-existing cysts and fibroadenomas has also been reported after HRT. The correlation between HRT and breast cancer is highly controversial. We examined 650 women: 550 of them (84.6%) received HRT (157 estrogens and 393 estrogens-progestins) and 100 (15.4%) refused treatment and were thus considered as a control group. All patients underwent mammography and DEXA before HRT and, during treatment, were followed-up yearly with mammography, often combined with US, and DEXA. Fisher's test was used for data analysis (confidence interval: 95%). The statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the HRT group and the control group only for the lumbar spine. Mammographic changes (Tab. II) were shown in 150 of 550 HRT patients. Increased breast density was the most frequent finding. Benign lesions arising de novo or increasing in size and/or number were observed in 41 of 150 patients (27.3%) in the HRT group, where 3 breast carcinomas were detected, versus 1 breast cancer only in the control group. HRT had a marked positive effect on bone mineral content (BMC) at 2 years' follow-up, but it remains debated if it reduces breast cancer risk. In conclusion, our results indicate that a yearly mammography is mandatory in long-term HRT subjects and US may be also needed in particularly dense breasts.     

The effect of postmenopausal estrogen therapy on the risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effect of postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy on the incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes in women. METHODS: Postmenopausal women aged 50 through 70 years (n=848) without diagnosed diabetes at baseline were followed for 10 to 15 years for incident diabestes. RESULTS: Over the average 11.5 year follow-ip, there were 105 new cases of diabetes. The age-adjusted relative-risk for development of diabetes was nonsignificantly lower for women with continuous estrogen replacement therapy use than for never users. After adjustment for major covariates, a nonsignificant linear trend with increasing duration of estrogen replacement therapy was reversed. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that previous results showing a reduced risk of diabetes in women using estrogen may have been due to selection bias regarding who is prescribed estrogen, confounding factors, or differential diagnostic efforts.     

Induction of Th2 cell differentiation in the primary immune response: dendritic cells isolated from adherent cell culture treated with IL-10 prime naive CD4+ T cells to secrete IL-4

Rates of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in women have varied substantially over the last 25 years. Data on the impact of recent recommendations for widespread use to prevent cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis and factors that influence use are needed. We attempted to (1) describe recent trends in HRT use, (2) investigate the relationship between HRT use and prepaid drug benefit, and (3) detail prescribing frequencies by provider specialty. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of annual HRT pharmacy dispensings from 1986 to 1995 in a large HMO to all female HMO members aged 45 years and older. HRT rates increased among all age categories, although the magnitude of change varied by age. Highest rates of use were found in those 50-59 years old. Although combined estrogen-progestin use increased, 57% of all estrogen users did not receive progestin in 1995. Unopposed estrogen use was largely limited to hysterectomized women. Women of all ages with no prepaid drug benefit as part of their HMO coverage had the lowest HRT rates. Internal medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, and family practice providers prescribed over 90% of HRT, and prescriber specialty varied with user age. HRT use increased in the HMO from 1986 to 1995, especially among younger women. In 1995, about half of women aged 50-64 years received one or more HRT dispensings. As the benefits, risks, and cost effectiveness of HRT depend on the duration of use, additional information on current use duration is needed. Combined estrogen-progestin use increased and appeared appropriate to hysterectomy status. Research is needed to determine if lower HRT use rates among women without a prepaid drug benefit indicate less prophylactic HRT use, particularly among younger women, for whom this lack of coverage was relatively common.     

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in postmenopausal women in developed countries. A possible cardioprotective role of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is suggested by epidemiologic studies of HRT and reduced risk of coronary heart disease, as well as by randomized trials of HRT and lipid subfractions. Estrogen has beneficial effects on the lipid profile, raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels each by approximately 10%. Other possible biologic mechanisms include beneficial effects on vascular function, oxidative status, endothelial-dependent vasodilation, intimal hyperplasia and insulin sensitivity. Estrogen's net effects on coagulation and fibrinolysis are less clear. Estrogen replacement therapy is associated with decreased atherosclerosis in several animal models. However, most of the available data on HRT derive from observational studies or small randomized trials assessing biologic intermediates rather than clinical events. Further research, including large-scale randomized clinical trials, are required to evaluate definitively the role of estrogen replacement therapy, especially given uncertainties about the effects of combined estrogen-progestin therapy and the balance of benefits and risk of this common intervention in postmenopausal women.