耗能梁段长度对高强钢组合Y型偏心支撑框架受力性能影响的研究

采用ABAQUS有限元软件对高强钢组合Y型偏心支撑框架进行有限元分析,分别对5种不同长度的耗能梁段的进行单调加载和循环加载,研究耗能梁段长度对框架受力性能的影响。分析表明,高强钢组合Y型偏心支撑框架的耗能能力较强;耗能梁段长度越长,结构的耗能能力也就越强,但长度增加到一定程度时,结构的承载能力明显降低。     

Y型偏心支撑钢框架的受力性能研究

Y型偏心支撑钢框架是最近发展起来的一种新型抗侧力结构体系,具有很好的抗震性能。可以通过改变耗能梁段的截面尺寸和支撑的布置形式来优化结构的抗震性能。本文基于我国现行《抗震规范》建立三个系列的一榀Y型偏心支撑钢框架平面模型,并运用有限元分析软件sap2000对结构进行pushover分析计算,研究了Y型偏心支撑钢框架的耗能梁段长度、腹板高厚比和耗能支撑的布置形式等参数对Y型偏心支撑钢框架结构抗震性能的影响,提出了相应的抗震设计建议。     

高层高强钢组合Y型偏心支撑钢框架结构抗震性能研究

伴随高强钢组合Y型偏心支撑钢框架结构的不断发展与更大范围的运用,为更好地掌握此类框架结构的抗震性能与综合表现,本文围绕该问题进行一系列的深入探究.在具体的分析过程中,首先通过ABAQUS有限元软件创建了相应的运算模型,并和试验结果展开对比分析,明确计算模型的可靠性.然后借助有限元分析软件ETABS建立了10层Y型钢框架...     

偏心支撑钢框架耗能梁段的设计

偏心支撑钢框架既具有较大的抗侧刚度,同时在大震作用下又具有很好的延性,介绍了偏心支撑钢框架中重要构件耗能梁段的设计方法。     

基于性能设计的高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能研究

Y形偏心支撑钢框架结构中耗能梁段置于框架梁之外,耗能梁段变形不会对主体结构和楼板造成损害,震后易于修复更换。为了保证耗能梁段充分发挥塑性变形进行耗能,非耗能构件(框架梁、框架柱)截面设计往往过大,浪费钢材且限制了偏心支撑钢框架的应用。高强钢组合偏心支撑框架结构是指耗能梁段采用普通钢材(Q345钢),而框架梁、柱等非耗能构件采用高强度钢材(如Q460),不仅有效减小构件截面,而且可以推动高强钢在抗震设防区的应用,经济效益显著。采用基于性能的抗震设计方法设计了5层、10层、15层和20层的Y形偏心支撑钢框架结构,算例模型包括高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架和传统普通钢Y形偏心支撑钢框架,通过Pushover分析和时程分析研究该结构形式的承载力、抗侧刚度、层间侧移分布及破坏模式。研究表明:相同设计条件下,高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架结构与普通钢Y形偏心支撑钢框架结构的承载能力相近,但抗侧刚度略低,罕遇地震作用下二者具有相似的层间侧移分布和破坏模式。     

耗能梁段长度对K形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能的影响

分析了K形偏心支撑钢框架中耗能梁段的受力特性,利用非线性有限元程序探讨了耗能梁段长度对K形偏心支撑钢框架刚度、延性及耗能性能的影响,提出了初步设计时耗能梁段长度的取值范围。     

耗能梁段长度对K形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能的影响

分析了K形偏心支撑钢框架中耗能梁段的受力特性,利用非线性有限元程序探讨了耗能梁段长度对K形偏心支撑钢框架刚度、延性及耗能性能的影响,提出了初步设计时耗能梁段长度的取值范围.     

D型偏心支撑钢框架耗能梁段性能研究

通过对具有不同耗能梁段长度的D型偏心支撑钢框架的滞回性能及耗能梁段耗能性能的非线性有限元分析,表明耗能梁段的长度对偏心支撑钢框架的侧向刚度、延性和耗能能力有较大影响。随着耗能梁段长度的增加,D型偏心支撑钢框架的强度、刚度、延性和耗能性能均产生了不同程度的退减现象;耗能梁段越短,其塑性变形越大,进而导致耗能梁段过早塑性破坏的可能性增大。根据有限元模拟结果提出了对耗能梁段长度的设计建议。     

可替换钢-聚氨酯组合耗能梁段研究

基于聚氨酯材料的优良性能,在箱梁内灌注聚氨酯,提出了可替换钢-聚氨酯组合耗能梁段。运用有限元分析软件ABAQUS分别建立了可替换的传统H型耗能梁段、箱型耗能梁段和钢-聚氨酯组合耗能梁段的偏心支撑框架,对比分析框架在滞回荷载作用下的抗震性能和耗能能力。结果表明:可替换钢-聚氨酯组合耗能梁段的耗能能力与抗震性能优于传统可替换耗能梁段,且加工工艺相对简单,在工程实践中可以推广使用。     

多层高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能试验研究

为研究高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑钢框架结构的抗震性能,进行了一个1∶2缩尺模型的三层结构试件的低周往复加载试验,从结构的承载能力、刚度退化、位移延性、耗能能力及破坏模式等方面评价了结构的抗震性能,试验采用三质点倒三角形比例加载。研究结果表明：高强钢组合Y形偏心支撑结构具有较高的承载能力、较好的位移延性和耗能能力,屈服强度较低的耗能连梁的弹塑性变形耗散了大部分地震能量,而高强钢非耗能构件基本处于弹性受力状态,保证了极限状态下结构的完整性。框架梁与耗能连梁连接节点处受力复杂、应力集中严重,加之楼板对框架梁的约束,该节点处变形较大,使得试件最终在此位置破坏。     

耗能梁段与带楼板RC框架梁连接节点滞回性能的有限元分析

基于文献[1]所进行的耗能梁段与带楼板RC框架梁连接节点的低周往复加载试验研究,采用非线性有限元程序ABAQUS对试件B-2进行模拟验证,并以B-2为BSAE试件,设计了U型板侧边注胶、螺杆强度、螺杆布置位置、螺杆直径等6个系列12个试件.对影响连接节点性能的主要设计参数进行分析,研究了此类连接节点的承载力、刚度及滞回性能,提出了相应的设计建议.     

3种偏心支撑钢框架的塑性设计方法

偏心支撑钢框架是在中心支撑钢框架的基础上发展起来的一种新型结构体系,它能够有效改善钢框架在大震作用下的抗震性能。本文基于已有耗能梁段的塑性设计模型,考虑钢材的应变硬化效应影响,提出了一种改进的偏心支撑耗能梁段塑性模型,并基于此模型对不同形式的偏心支撑钢框架在弯矩、剪力共同作用下的屈服模型进行了研究,推导出其塑性设计公式。     

梁贯通式支撑钢框架体系的强度折减系数研究

基于强度折减系数的抗震设计方法,将增量动力分析（IDA）和能力谱法（CSM）结合,对典型梁贯通式支撑钢框架结构的强度折减系数进行研究。采用结构试验校准后的有限元分析模型对结构进行分析,得到结构性能点。通过比较按照设防烈度弹性设计的基底剪力Ve和按照小震设计的基底剪力Vd得到强度折减系数R。分析表明：支撑与框架柱的配置比例及布置方式会对此类结构的强度折减系数产生影响;适用于7度设防烈度的典型两层结构两种支撑配置比例（CASE1和CASE2一层与二层支撑配置比例分别为3∶1和2∶1）梁贯通式支撑钢框架结构体系的强度折减系数可分别取为3.02和2.54。最后建议了该新型结构体系考虑强度折减系数并基于我国现行规范进行抗震设计的地震作用取值范围。     

V型偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能非线性时程分析

针对V型偏心支撑钢框架的不同耗能梁段长度,运用有限元分析软件SAP2000对相应的算例进行非线性时程分析。通过对构件内力、节点位移等计算结果的分析,并与D型和K型偏心支撑钢框架非线性时程分析的结果进行比较,得到了一些结论,以供工程设计人员参考。     

D型偏心支撑钢框架抗震性能非线性时程分析

针对D型偏心支撑钢框架的不同耗能梁段长度,运用有限元分析软件SAP2000对相应的算例进行非线性时程分析。通过对构件内力、节点位移等计算结果的分析得到了一些结论,以供工程设计人员参考。     

高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架抗震性能对比分析

为研究不同强度组合的高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架结构的抗震性能,设计了一组不同强度(Q345、Q460、Q690钢材)组合的5层K形偏心支撑框架结构算例Q345-5、Q460-5和算例Q690-5,选取10条地震动记录对其进行动力时程分析,得到各算例在不同水准地震作用下的耗能梁段转角和层间位移角。研究表明:8度罕遇地震作用下,高强钢组合K形偏心支撑框架的层间位移角比传统K形偏心支撑钢框架大,各算例耗能梁段全部进入塑性变形阶段;塑性层间位移角到达规范限值时,算例Q460-5框架梁开始进入塑性变形阶段,算例Q690-5框架柱、框架梁和支撑均处于弹性变形阶段,还可以承受更大的地震作用;达到定义的极限状态时,与传统偏心支撑钢框架相比,算例Q460-5能够承受的地震作用和耗能梁段转角更小;算例Q690-5承受的地震作用和耗能梁段转角更大。     

Seismic performance of Y‐type eccentrically braced frames combined with high‐strength steel based on performance‐based seismic design

In the Y‐type eccentrically braced frame structures, the links as fuses are generally located outside the beams; the links can be easily repairable or replaceable after earthquake without obvious damage in the slab and beam. The non‐dissipative member (beams, braces, and columns) in the Y‐type eccentrically braced frames are overestimated designed to ensure adequate plastic deformation of links with dissipating sufficient energy. However, the traditionally code design not only wastes steel but also limits the application of eccentrically braced frames. In this paper, Y‐type eccentrically braced steel frames with high‐strength steel is proposed; links and braces are fabricated with Q345 steel (the nominal yield stress is 345 MPa); the beams and columns are fabricated with high‐strength steel. The usage of high‐strength steel effectively decreases the cross sections of structural members as well as reduces the construction cost. The performance‐based seismic design of eccentrically braced frames was proposed to achieve the ideal failure mode and the same objective. Based on this method, four groups Y‐type eccentrically braced frames of 5‐story, 10‐story, 15‐story, and 20‐story models with ideal failure modes were designed, and each group includes Y‐type eccentrically braced frames with ordinary steel and Y‐type eccentrically braced frames with high‐strength steel. Nonlinear pushover and nonlinear dynamic analyses were performed on all prototypes, and the near‐fault and far‐fault ground motions are considered. The bearing capacity, lateral stiffness, story drift, link rotations, and failure modes were compared. The results indicated that Y‐type eccentrically braced frames with high‐strength steel have a similar bearing capacity to ordinary steel; however, the lateral stiffness of Y‐type eccentrically braced frames with high‐strength steel is smaller. Similar failure modes and story drift distribution of the prototype structures designed using the performance‐based seismic design method are performed under rare earthquake conditions.     

Seismic testing and numerical analysis of Y‐shaped eccentrically braced frame made of high‐strength steel

In eccentrically braced frame made of high‐strength steel (HSS‐EBF), link and brace are made from conventional steel whereas other structural members use high‐strength steel. Using HSS for beams and columns in EBF can reduce steel consumption and increase economic efficiency. In this paper, one shake table test of a 1:2 scaled three‐story Y‐shaped HSS‐EBF (Y‐HSS‐EBF) specimen was carried out to study its seismic behavior underground motions with different peak ground accelerations. The dynamic properties, base shear force, displacement, and strain responses of the specimen were obtained from this test. In addition, the finite element models of two 10‐story Y‐HSS‐EBF buildings and one 10‐story conventional Y‐EBF building were evaluated for seismic effects. Nonlinear pushover and dynamic analyses were conducted to compare their seismic performance and economy. The results indicated that the specimen exhibited sufficient lateral stiffness and safety but suffered some localized damages. During the high seismic intensity earthquakes, the links of the test specimen were in inelastic to dissipate the earthquake energy, whereas other structural members remained in the elastic state. Under the same design conditions, Y‐HSS‐EBF used less steel than that of conventional Y‐EBF, which could reduce the amount of steel used in Y‐HSS‐EBF. The Y‐HSS‐EBF is a safe, dual system with reliable seismic performance.