Blur and contrast as pictorial depth cues

OBJECTIVE: Infusion of GH secretagogues appears to be a novel endocrine approach to reverse the catabolic state of critical illness, through amplification of the endogenously blunted GH secretion associated with a substantial IGF-I rise. Here we report the dynamic characteristics of spontaneous nightly TSH and PRL secretion during prolonged critical illness, together with the concomitant effects exerted by the administration of GH-secretagogues, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) in particular, on night-time TSH and PRL secretion. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: Twenty-six critically ill adults (mean +/- SEM age: 63 +/- 2 years) were studied during two consecutive nights (2100-0600 h). According to a weighed randomization, they received 1 of 4 combinations of infusions, within a randomized, cross-over design for each combination: placebo (one night) and GHRH (the next night) (n = 4); placebo and GHRP-2 (n = 10); GHRH and GHRP-2 (n = 6); GHRP-2 and GHRH + GHRP-2 (n = 6). Peptide infusions (duration 21 hours) were started after a bolus of 1 microgram/kg at 0900 h and infused (1 microgram/kg/h) until 0600 h. MEASUREMENTS: Serum concentrations of TSH and PRL were determined by IRMA every 20 minutes and T4, T3 and rT3 by RIA at 2100 h and 0600 h in each study night. Hormone secretion was quantified using deconvolution analysis. RESULTS: During prolonged critical illness, mean night-time serum concentrations of TSH (1.25 +/- 0.42 mlU/l) and PRL (9.4 +/- 0.9 micrograms/l) were low-normal. However, the proportion of TSH and PRL that was released in a pulsatile fashion was low (32 +/- 6% and 16 +/- 2.6%) and no nocturnal TSH or PRL surges were observed. The serum levels of T3 (0.64 +/- 0.06 nmol/l) were low and were positively related to the number of TSH bursts (R2 = 0.32; P = 0.03) and to the log of pulsatile TSH production (R2 = 0.34; P = 0.03). GHRP-2 infusion further reduced the proportion of TSH released in a pulsatile fashion to half that during placebo infusion (P = 0.02), without altering mean TSH levels. GHRH infusion increased mean TSH levels and pulsatile TSH production, 2-fold compared to placebo (P = 0.03) and 3-fold compared to GHRP-2 (P = 0.008). The addition of GHRP-2 to GHRH infusion abolished the stimulatory effect of GHRH on pulsatile TSH secretion. GHRP-2 infusion induced a small increase in mean PRL levels (21%; P = 0.02) and basal PRL secretion rate (49%; P = 0.02) compared to placebo, as did GHRH and GHRH + GHRP-2. CONCLUSIONS: The characterization of the specific pattern of anterior pituitary function during prolonged critical illness is herewith extended to the dynamics of TSH and PRL secretion: mean serum levels are low-normal, no noctumal surge is observed and the pulsatile fractions of TSH and PRL release are reduced, as was shown previously for GH. Low circulating thyroid hormone levels appear positively correlated with the reduced pulsatile TSH secretion, suggesting that they have, at least in part, a neuroendocrine origin. Finally, the opposite effects of different GH-secretagogues on TSH secretion further delineate particular linkages between the somatotrophic and thyrotrophic axes during critical illness.     

UK study of intrapartum care for low risk primigravidas: a survey of interventions

GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs) and their non-peptidly mimetics are synthetic molecules which possess marked, dose-related and reproducible GH-releasing effect even after oral administration. Their potent stimulatory effect on GH secretion suggested that GHRP could be useful as provocative test on the diagnosis of GH deficiency. We compared the GH response to the maximal effective dose of Hexarelin (2 micrograms/kg i.v.), an hexapeptide belonging to GHRP family, with that of GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) alone and combined with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.), which likely acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. We studied 6 prepubertal (4 boys and 2 girls, age 2.6-12.2 yr) and 6 pubertal children with normal short stature (3 boys and 3 girls, age 10.3-14.4 yr) as well as 12 normal young adults (6 males and 6 females, age 22-30 yr) and 12 normal elderly subjects (6 males and 6 females, age 53-79 yr). In prepubertal children, the GH response to HEX (19.0 +/- 4.6 micrograms/l; 611.5 +/- 121.4 micrograms/l/h) was lower than that to GHRH (27.4 +/- 12.7 micrograms/l; 1209.0 +/- 590.9 micrograms/l/h) but this difference did not attain statistical significance. Both these responses were, in turn, lower (p < 0.05) than that to ARG + GHRH (57.9 +/- 15.1 micrograms/l; 2483.6 +/- 696.6 micrograms/l/h). In pubertal children, the GH response to HEX (67.6 +/- 12.7 micrograms/l; 2755.3 +/- 547.3 micrograms/l/h) was higher than that to ARG + GHRH (49.1 +/- 8.9 micrograms/l; 2554.1 +/- 356.6 micrograms/l/h) but this difference did not attain statistical significance; both these responses were, in turn, clearly higher (p < 0.05) than that to GHRH alone (23.1 +/- 7.9 micrograms/l; 1004.8 +/- 214.3 micrograms/l/h). In young adults, the GH response to HEX 60.9 +/- 8.0 micrograms/l; 2401.0 +/- 376.2 micrograms/l/h) was similar to that to ARG + GHRH (68.9 +/- 11.7 micrograms/l; 3035.7 +/- 466.6 micrograms/l/h) and both were clearly higher (p < 0.001) than that to GHRH alone (21.6 +/- 3.6 micrograms/l; 790.0 +/- 137.0 micrograms/l/h). In elderly subjects, the GH response to HEX (22.4 +/- 4.9; 855.0 +/- 199.0 micrograms/l/h) was higher (p < 0.01) than that to GHRH (3.6 +/- 0.8 micrograms/l; 151.8 +/- 24.6 micrograms/l/h) but lower (p < 0.05) than that to ARG + GHRH (48.1 +/- 4.6 micrograms/l; 1758.2 +/- 149.1 micrograms/l/h). In conclusion, GHRPs are a powerful stimulus of GH secretion in pubertal children and young adults only. On the other hand, the age-related variations in the GH response to GHRPs probably limit their reliability for the evaluation of GH releasable pool in prepubertal children and elderly subjects.     

The growth hormone response to hexarelin in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome

Hexarelin (Hex) is a synthetic hexapeptide with potent GH-releasing activity in both animals and men. Aim of this study was to evaluate the GH response to a maximal dose of Hex and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in a group of patients with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). Seven patients (4 boys and 3 girls, age 2.4-14.2 yr) with PWS, 10 prepubertal obese children (7 boys and 3 girls, age 7.5-12.0 yr), and 24 prepubertal short normal children (11 boys and 13 girls, age 5.9-13 yr) with body weight within +/- 10% of their ideal weight were studied. All subjects were tested on two occasions with GHRH 1-29 at the dose of 1 microgram/Kg i.v., and with Hex at the dose of 2 micrograms/Kg i.v. In the PWS patients the GH response to GHRH (peak = 6.4 +/- 2.0 micrograms/l, p < 0.0001; AUC = 248 +/- 70 micrograms min/l, p < 0.0001) was significantly lower than that observed in the short normal children and similar to that observed in the obese children. In the PWS children the GH response to Hex (peak = 7.5 +/- 1.6 micrograms/l; AUC = 309 +/- 53) was similar to that observed after GHRH and significantly lower than that observed in the obese children (p < 0.05). The results of this study show that PWS patients have a blunted GH response to the administration of a maximal dose of Hex. Whether these findings reflect a more severe pituitary GH deficiency in PWS than in obese children or a deranged hypothalamic regulation of GH secretion need further investigation.     

Pancreatic enzymes: secretion and luminal nutrient digestion in health and disease

Leptin is a hormone secreted by the adipocytes that regulates food intake and energy expenditure. It is known that growth hormone (GH) secretion is markedly influenced by body weight, being suppressed in obesity and cachexia, and recent data have demonstrated that GH release is regulated by leptin levels. Although one of the sites of action of leptin is likely to be the hypothalamus, since leptin receptor mRNA is particularly abundant in several hypothalamic nuclei, the mechanisms by which leptin regulates GH secretion are not yet known. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether leptin could act at the hypothalamic level modulating somatostatin and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) expression. The administration of anti-GHRH serum (500 microl, i.v.) completely blocked leptin-induced GH release in fasting rats. In contrast, the treatment with anti-somatostatin serum (500 microl, i.v.) significantly increased GH release in this condition. Furthermore, leptin administration (10 microg, i.c.v.) to intact fasting animals reversed the inhibitory effect produced by fasting on GHRH mRNA levels in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, and increased somatostatin mRNA content in the periventricular nucleus. Finally, leptin administration (10 microgram, i.c.v.) to hypophysectomized fasting rats increased GHRH mRNA levels, and decreased somatostatin mRNA content, indicating an effect of leptin on hypothalamic GHRH- and somatostatin-producing neurons. These findings suggest a role for GHRH and somatostatin as mediators of leptin-induced GH secretion.     

Hot water swallows improve symptoms and accelerate esophageal clearance in esophageal motility disorders

The mechanism of action of the synthetic growth hormone (GH)releasing peptide hexarelin is not yet fully understood. Although a direct effect on pituitary cells has been demonstrated, the peptide is also active at hypothalamic level, where specific binding sites have been found. The observation that hexarelin acts synergistically with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in releasing GH has suggested that it might suppress endogenous somatostatin secretion. As somatostatin is also inhibitory on TSH secretion, to verify the occurrence of modifications of the somatostatinergic tone induced by hexarelin, we studied its effects on TRH-induced TSH secretion. Seven normal subjects (4 women and 3 men aged 24-29 years) underwent the following tests on 3 different days: a) TRH (200 micrograms/l i.v.) + placebo; b) hexarelin (1 microgram/Kg bw i.v.) + placebo c) combined TRH + hexarelin administration. Hexarelin induced significant and similar increases in serum GH levels when given in combination either with placebo or with TRH (1217 +/- 470 vs 986 +/- 208 micrograms/min/l p:NS), while no modifications of GH levels were seen after TRH + placebo. Serum TSH levels were unmodified by hexarelin + placebo injection. The TSH increase elicited by hexarelin + TRH was superimposable to that elicited by TRH + placebo (1124 +/- 530 and 1273 +/- 380 mU/min/l respectively). Circulating PRL levels slightly increased after hexarelin + placebo too (897 micrograms/min/l), and the PRL response to hexarelin + TRH was slightly, although not significantly, greater than that observed after TRH + placebo (2680 +/- 1517 and 2243 +/- 1108 micrograms/min/l, respectively). In conclusion, our data show that hexarelin does not alter basal and TRH-stimulated TSH secretion, thus suggesting that it does not inhibit somatostatin release. Furthermore a modest PRL-releasing effect of this peptide has been confirmed.     

The diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma]

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the existence of an opioid stimulatory tone on growth hormone (GH) secretion in the human male. DESIGN: Seven healthy male volunteers, aged 19-30, were studied in the Endocrine Unit of the University of Sassari. GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), 100 micrograms as an intravenous (IV) bolus, as administered with and without preadministration of IV naloxone, 2 mg as a bolus followed by a constant infusion of 2 mg/h. Blood samples were taken for 120 minutes after GHRH administration. RESULTS: Naloxone significantly blunted the GH response to GHRH, measured either as mean peak value (at times 30 to 90) or as integrated concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone is able to decrease the effect of a maximal dose of GHRH, thus suggesting the existence of an opioid stimulatory tone on GH secretion.     

Mechanisms of action of growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 in bovine pituitary cells

We investigated the desensitization caused by growth hormone (GH)-releasing peptide-2 (D-Ala-D-beta Nal-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2; GHRP-2) in vivo using calves. The GHRP-2 (12.5 micrograms.kgBW-1.h-1) or GH-releasing factor (GRF; .125 microgram.kgBW-1.h-1) were infused for 180 min into four calves, each followed by either GHRP-2 (12.5 micrograms/kg BW) or GRF (.125 microgram/kg BW) injection after 60 min. All treatments were given to all of the calves. The continuous infusion of GHRP-2 did not attenuate the GH secretion caused by a GRF bolus, and vice versa. Continuous exposure to GHRP-2 attenuated the GH secretion caused by a GHRP-2 bolus. In an additional experiment, two repetitive injections of GHRP-2 (12.5 micrograms/kg BW) at 1-, 2-, 3-, or 4-h intervals were administered. Attenuation of the GH response caused by GHRP-2 was maintained until 4 h. These results suggest that GHRP-2 is not cross-desensitized with GRF and that the mechanisms by which they cause GH release may be different in calves.     

Ipamorelin, the first selective growth hormone secretagogue

The development and pharmacology of a new potent growth hormone (GH) secretagogue, ipamorelin, is described. Ipamorelin is a pentapeptide (Aib-His-D-2-Nal-D-Phe-Lys-NH2), which displays high GH releasing potency and efficacy in vitro and in vivo. As an outcome of a major chemistry programme, ipamorelin was identified within a series of compounds lacking the central dipeptide Ala-Trp of growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP)-1. In vitro, ipamorelin released GH from primary rat pituitary cells with a potency and efficacy similar to GHRP-6 (ECs) = 1.3+/-0.4nmol/l and Emax = 85+/-5% vs 2.2+/-0.3nmol/l and 100%). A pharmacological profiling using GHRP and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) antagonists clearly demonstrated that ipamorelin, like GHRP-6, stimulates GH release via a GHRP-like receptor. In pentobarbital anaesthetised rats, ipamorelin released GH with a potency and efficacy comparable to GHRP-6 (ED50 = 80+/-42nmol/kg and Emax = 1545+/-250ng GH/ml vs 115+/-36nmol/kg and 1167+/-120ng GH/ml). In conscious swine, ipamorelin released GH with an ED50 = 2.3+/-0.03 nmol/kg and an Emax = 65+/-0.2 ng GH/ml plasma. Again, this was very similar to GHRP-6 (ED50 = 3.9+/-1.4 nmol/kg and Emax = 74+/-7ng GH/ml plasma). GHRP-2 displayed higher potency but lower efficacy (ED50 = 0.6 nmol/kg and Emax = 56+/-6 ng GH/ml plasma). The specificity for GH release was studied in swine. None of the GH secretagogues tested affected FSH, LH, PRL or TSH plasma levels. Administration of both GHRP-6 and GHRP-2 resulted in increased plasma levels of ACTH and cortisol. Very surprisingly, ipamorelin did not release ACTH or cortisol in levels significantly different from those observed following GHRH stimulation. This lack of effect on ACTH and cortisol plasma levels was evident even at doses more than 200-fold higher than the ED50 for GH release. In conclusion, ipamorelin is the first GHRP-receptor agonist with a selectivity for GH release similar to that displayed by GHRH. The specificity of ipamorelin makes this compound a very interesting candidate for future clinical development.     

Longtime administration of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) does not restore the reduced efficiency of GHRH on sleep endocrine activity in 2 old-aged subjects--a preliminary study

Aging results in a more shallow sleep accompanied by a blunted growth hormone (GH) secretion. In young male normal controls repetitive administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) at the beginning of the night results in an increased secretion of GH, a blunting of cortisol and a stimulation of slow-wave sleep (SWS). In healthy elderly men and women, however, GHRH exerts only weak effects on sleep-endocrine activity. In a previous report continuous treatment of healthy elderly males by repetitive administration of GHRH (during 12 days administration with 100 micrograms GHRH i.v. at 9.00 h every second day, "priming") enhanced GHRH stimulated GH secretion at daytime markedly. We tested if priming with GHRH results in a more distinct modulation of the nocturnal hormone secretion and of the sleep EEG than acute administration of the peptide. Two elderly male controls spent first three consecutive nights in the sleep laboratory, the first of which served for adaptation to laboratory conditions. During the two other nights (at days 1 and 2) sleep EEG was recorded and blood was sampled for determining the secretion of GH, cortisol and ACTH. In one of the nights the subjects received 50 micrograms GHRH hourly between 22.00 h and 1.00 h (4 x 50 micrograms) or placebo. The next examination followed after the priming period at day 14 and the last was performed two weeks after treatment at day 28. After the baseline administration of 4 x 50 micrograms GHRH before priming no clear changes of sleep EEG towards improved sleep were detectable, whereas GH secretion was increased. After priming sleep period time and SWS time were lower compared to the baseline night with GHRH administration, whereas REM time duration increased. GHRH induced GH secretion was not enhanced after priming. ACTH secretion was markedly enhanced compared to baseline stimulation. We conclude that priming with GHRH has no sleep improving effect and does not change hormone secretion in elderly normal subjects. Hence in the elderly priming with GHRH is not capable to induce a rejuvenation of sleep endocrine activity.     

Leptin levels in protracted critical illness: effects of growth hormone-secretagogues and thyrotropin-releasing hormone

Prolonged critical illness is characterized by feeding-resistant wasting of protein, whereas reesterification, instead of oxidation of fatty acids, allows fat stores to accrue and associate with a low-activity status of the somatotropic and thyrotropic axis, which seems to be partly of hypothalamic origin. To further unravel this paradoxical metabolic condition, and in search of potential therapeutic strategies, we measured serum concentrations of leptin; studied the relationship with body mass index, insulin, cortisol, thyroid hormones, and somatomedins; and documented the effects of hypothalamic releasing factors, in particular, GH-secretagogues and TRH. Twenty adults, critically ill for several weeks and supported with normocaloric, continuously administered parenteral and/or enteral feeding, were studied for 45 h. They had been randomized to receive one of three combinations of peptide infusions, in random order: TRH (one day) and placebo (other day); TRH + GH-releasing peptide (GHRP)-2 and GHRP-2; TRH + GHRH + GHRP-2 and GHRH + GHRP-2. Peptide infusions were started after a 1-microgram/kg bolus at 0900 h and infused (1 microgram/kg.h) until 0600 h the next morning. Serum concentrations of leptin, insulin, cortisol, T4, T3, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-binding protein-3 and the acid-labile subunit (ALS) were measured at 0900 h, 2100 h, and 0600 h on each of the 2 study days. Baseline leptin levels (mean +/- SEM: 12.4 +/- 2.1 micrograms/L) were independent of body mass index (25 +/- 1 kg/m2), insulin (18.6 +/- 2.9 microIU/mL), cortisol (504 +/- 43 mmol/L), and thyroid hormones (T4: 63 +/- 5 nmol/L, T3: 0.72 +/- 0.08 nmol/L) but correlated positively with circulating levels of IGF-I [86 +/- 6 micrograms/L, determination coefficient (R2) = 0.25] and ALS (7.2 +/- 0.6 mg/L, R2 = 0.32). Infusion of placebo or TRH had no effect on leptin. In contrast, GH-secretagogues elevated leptin levels within 12 h. Infusion of GHRP-2 alone induced a maximal leptin increase of +87% after 24 h, whereas GHRH + GHRP-2 elevated leptin by up to +157% after 24 h. The increase in leptin within 12 h was related (R2 = 0.58) to the substantial rise in insulin. After 45 h, and having reached a plateau, leptin was related to the increased IGF-I (R2 = 0.37). In conclusion, circulating leptin levels during protracted critical illness were linked to the activity state of the GH/IGF-I axis. Stimulating the GH/IGF-I axis with GH-secretagogues increased leptin levels within 12 h. Because leptin may stimulate oxidation of fatty acids, and because GH, IGF-I, and insulin have a protein-sparing effect, GH-secretagogue administration may be expected to result in increased utilization of fat as preferential substrate and to restore protein content in vital tissues and, consequently, has potential as a strategy to reverse the paradoxical metabolic condition of protracted critical illness.     

Effects of growth hormone secretagogues on prolactin release in anesthetized dwarf (dw/dw) rats

In addition to stimulating GH release, GH secretagogues such as GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) stimulate small amounts of ACTH and PRL release. Although the effects on ACTH have recently been studied, there is little information about the effects of GHRP-6 on PRL. We have now studied GHRP-6-induced GH and PRL release and their regulation by estrogen (E2) in anesthetized male and female rats and in GH-deficient dwarf (dw/dw) rats that maintain high pituitary PRL stores and show elevated hypothalamic GH secretagogue receptor expression. Whereas GHRP-6 (0.1-2.5 microg, i.v.) did not induce PRL release in normal male or female rats, significant PRL responses were observed in dw/dw females. These responses were abolished by ovariectomy and could be strongly induced in male dw/dw rats by E2 treatment. These effects could be dissociated from GHRP-6-induced GH release in the same animals, but not from PRL release induced by TRH, which was also abolished by ovariectomy and induced in males by E2 treatment. However, the effects of GHRP-6 on PRL were unlikely to be mediated by TRH because in the same animals, TSH levels were unaffected by GHRP-6 whereas they were increased by TRH. The increased PRL response could reflect an increase in GH secretagogue receptor expression that was observed in the arcuate and ventromedial nuclei of E2-treated rats. Our results suggest that the minimal PRL-releasing activity of GHRP-6 in normal rats becomes prominent in GH-deficient female dw/dw rats and is probably exerted directly at the pituitary; these GHRP-6 actions may be modulated by E2 at both hypothalamic and pituitary sites.     

Alcoholism abolishes the growth hormone response to sumatriptan administration in man

To assess the possible influence of alcoholism on serotonergic control of growth hormone (GH) secretion, 6 mg of the 5-HT1D serotonergic receptor agonist, sumatriptan, was injected subcutaneously in a group of nine normal controls (aged 32 to 49 years) and in nine age-matched nondepressed male alcoholic subjects after 10 to 25 days of abstinence from alcohol. During the same period, subjects were also tested with GH-releasing hormone ([GHRH] 1 microgram/kg body weight in an intravenous [i.v.] bolus) and L-arginine, which releases GH from somatostatin inhibition (50 g in 50 mL normal saline over 30 minutes) to determine whether GH secretion in response to alternate secretagogues is preserved in alcoholics. A control test with administration of normal saline instead of drug treatments was also performed. Plasma GH levels were recorded over 2 hours in all tests. Administration of placebo did not change plasma GH levels in any subject. Similar GH responses were observed in normal controls and alcoholic subjects when GHRH or arginine were administered. A significant GH increase was observed in normal controls after sumatriptan injection; in contrast, GH secretion was not modified by sumatriptan administration in alcoholic patients. These data show that alcoholism is associated with an impairment in the serotonergic-stimulatory regulation of GH secretion, whereas GH responses to direct pituitary stimulation with GHRH or to release from somatostatinergic inhibition with arginine appear to be preserved in alcoholics.     

In obesity, glucose load loses its early inhibitory, but maintains its late stimulatory, effect on somatotrope secretion

Glucose load has a biphasic effect on GH secretion. In fact, in normal subjects, glucose load has a prompt inhibitory and a late stimulatory effect on both spontaneous and GHRH-induced GH levels. The mechanism underlying the inhibitory effect is probably mediated by the increase in hypothalamic somatostatin, whereas that underlying the stimulatory effect is unclear. On the other hand, in obesity, a reduced somatotrope responsiveness to all GH secretagogues is well known, whereas recently, we found that glucose load, but not pirenzepine and somatostatin, fails to inhibit the GHRH-induced GH rise. Thus, the inhibitory effect of hyperglycemia on GH secretion is selectively lacking in obesity. The aim of the present study was to verify whether in obesity the late stimulatory effect of glucose on GH secretion is preserved. We studied 15 female obese patients (OB; age, 33.9 +/- 2.6 yr; body mass index, 36.4 +/- 1.5 kg/m2; waist/hip ratio, 0.9 +/- 0.1) and 12 normal female subjects (NS; 26.5 +/- 1.0 yr; 21.4 +/- 0.3 kg/m2) as controls. Two studies were performed. In study A (six OB and six NS) we evaluated the somatotrope response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg, i.v., at 0 min) alone or preceded by oral glucose (OGTT; 100 g, orally, at -45 min). In study B (nine OB and six NS) we studied the somatotrope response to OGTT (100 g, orally, at 0 min), saline plus GHRH (1 microgram/kg, iv, at 150 min), and OGTT plus GHRH. In study A, the GHRH-induced GH rise in NS was higher (P < 0.01) than that in OB. OGTT blunted the GHRH-induced GH rise in NS (0-90 min area under the curve, 318.9 +/- 39.1 vs. 696.3 +/- 110.8 micrograms/min-L; P < 0.05), but failed to modify it in OB (289.1 +/- 51.7 vs. 283.9 +/- 44.0 micrograms/min-L). In study B, the GHRH-induced GH rise in NS was higher (P < 0.01) than that in OB. OGTT induced a late GH increase in both NS (150-240 min area under the curve, 249.6 +/- 45.2 micrograms/min-L) and OB (103.2 +/- 31.4 micrograms/min-L). Moreover, OGTT enhanced the GHRH-induced GH rise in NS as well as in OB [1433.0 +/- 202.0 vs. 967.9 +/- 116.3 micrograms/min-L (P < 0.03) and 763.8 +/- 131.0 vs. 278.1 +/- 52.3 micrograms/min-L (P < 0.01), respectively]. The GH responses to OGTT alone and combined with GHRH in OB were lower (P < 0.03) than those in NS. Our data show that in human obesity, the oral glucose load loses its precocious inhibitory effect on the GHRH-induced GH rise but maintains its late stimulatory effect on somatotrope secretion. These findings suggest that the inhibitory and stimulatory effects of glucose load on GH secretion are unlikely to be due to biphasic modulation of hypothalamic somatostatin release, which seems selectively refractory to stimulation by hyperglycemia in obesity.     

Growth hormone responses to growth hormone-releasing hormone and clonidine before and after erythropoietin therapy in CAPD patients

Correction of anemia with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in patients with end-stage renal disease has been associated with improvement of several abnormalities in hypothalamo-hypophyseal functions. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the growth hormone (GH) responses to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and clonidine stimulation, as well as the baseline concentrations of insulin-like growth factor I(IGF-I), before and after the correction of anemia with rhEPO in a group of uremic patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Nine clinically stable patients (1 male, 8 female; mean age 55.4 years; mean duration of CAPD 14.1 months) were studied. Twelve normal volunteers were studied as controls. GHRH and clonidine stimulation tests were performed prior to starting rhEPO and again after partial correction of anemia with rhEPO therapy (60-130 U/kg/week, s.c., for 12 weeks). Blood samples for GH were collected during 2 h after GHRH (100 micrograms i.v. in bolus) or clonidine (0.15 mg/m2, p.o.) administration. In basal plasma samples IGF-I concentrations were also measured. Mean (+/- SEM) blood hemoglobin concentration rose from 5.32 +/- 0.25 to 7.22 +/- 0.25 mmol/l (p < 0.001) after rhEPO treatment. GH responses to GHRH were characterized by marked differences in single patients when compared with the control group. However, the GH peak and the area under the secretory curves (AUC) of GH responses in CAPD patients (9.89 +/- 4.01 micrograms/l and 15.06 +/- 6.02 micrograms.h/l, respectively) did not differ from those obtained in control subjects (14.58 +/- 3.25 microgram/l and 16.94 +/- 4.31 microgram.h/l, respectively). The study after correction of anemia showed an evident potentiation of GH values that reached statistically significant values at 60 and 90 min. GH AUC after rhEPO therapy rose to 25.61 +/- 9.25 micrograms.h/l (p = 0.01). In control subjects, clonidine administration was followed by a GH release that reached a maximum at 90 min (7.67 +/- 2.24 micrograms/l). However, CAPD patients exhibited a blunted response to clonidine both before (2.00 +/- 0.78 microgram/l) and after (2.78 +/- 0.76 microgram/l, NS) correction of the anemia with rhEPO. On the other hand, IGF-I concentrations after rhEPO therapy (32.05 +/- 5.52 nmol/l) were not significantly different from those found prior to starting therapy (38.13 +/- 8.44 nmol/l). In conclusion, these results suggest that correction of the anemia with rhEPO therapy potentiates GH responses to direct pituitary stimulation with GHRH although it is unable to restore the blunted response of GH to clonidine that is found in CAPD patients.     

Host defense within the urinary tract. I. Bacterial adhesion initiates an uroepithelial defense mechanism

The reliability and reproducibility of provocative stimuli of growth hormone (GH) secretion in the diagnosis of GH deficiency are still controversial both in childhood and in adulthood. The combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and arginine (ARG), which likely acts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, is one of the most potent stimuli known so far and has been proposed recently as the best test to explore the maximal somatotrope capacity of somatotrope cells. However, it is well known that, usually, provocative stimuli of GH secretion suffer from poor reproducibility and that of the GHRH + ARG test has still to be verified. We aimed to verify the between- and within-subject variability of the GH response to the GHRH + ARG test in normal subjects during their lifespan as well as in hypopituitaric patients with GH deficiency (GHD). In 10 normal children (C: six male and four female, age 12.3 +/- 0.9 years, body mass index (BMI) = 16.6 +/- 0.7 kg/m2, pubertal stages I-III), 18 normal young adults (Y: ten male and eight female, age 31.1 +/- 1.3 years, BMI = 21.4 +/- 0.4 kg/m2), 12 normal elderly subjects (E: two male and ten female, age 74.4 +/- 1.8 years, BMI= 22.6 +/- 0.6 kg/m2) and 15 panhypopituitaric GH-deficient patients (GHD: nine male and six female, age 40.9 +/- 4.1 years, BMI= 22.7 +/- 1.0 kg/m2), we studied the inter- and intra-individual variability of the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v.) + ARG (0.5 g/kg i.v.) in two different sessions at least 3 days apart. The GH responses to GHRH + ARG in C (1st vs 2nd session: 61.6 +/- 8.1 vs 66.5 +/- 9.4 microg/l), Y (70.4 +/- 10.1 vs 76.2 10.7 microg/l) and E (57.9 14.8 vs 52.1 +/- 8.0 microg/l) were similar and reproducible in all groups. The somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH + ARG also showed a limited within-subject variability (r = 0.71, 0.90 and 0.89 and p < 0.02, 0.0005 and 0.0005 for C, Y and E, respectively). Similarly in GHD, the GH response to the GHRH + ARG test showed a good inter- (1st vs 2nd session: 2.3 +/- 0.5 vs 2.2 +/- 0.6 microg/l) and intra-individual reproducibility (r = 0.70, p < 0.005). The GHRH + ARG-induced GH responses in GHD were markedly lower (p < 0.0005) than those in age-matched controls and no overlap was found between GH peak responses in GHD and normal subjects. In normal subjects, the GH response to GHRH + ARG is very marked, independent of age and shows limited inter- and intra-individual variability. The GH response to the GHRH + ARG test is strikingly reduced in panhypopituitaric patients with GHD, in whom the low somatotrope responsiveness is reproducible. Thus, these findings strengthen the hypothesis that GHRH + ARG should be considered the most reliable test to evaluate the maximal secretory capacity of somatotrope cells and to distinguish normal subjects from GHD patients in adulthood.     

Favourable effect of olive oil in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. The effect on blood pressure, blood glucose and lipid levels of a high-fat diet rich in monounsaturated fat compared with a carbohydrate-rich diet

The aim of the study was to elucidate the role of the neuropeptide galanin in the regulation of somatotropic and gonadotropic function in normal women. Thirteen normally ovulating (aged 28 to 40 years), non-obese (body mass index, 18.4 to 27.1 kg/m2) women with infertility due to a tubal or male factor were studied. Each woman underwent three tests: (1) bolus intravenous (IV) injection of growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone (GHRH) (1-29)NH2 1 microgram/kg plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) 100 micrograms at time 0; (2) IV infusion of porcine galanin 500 micrograms in 100 mL saline from -10 minutes; and (3) bolus IV injection of GHRH(1-29)NH2 1 microgram/kg plus GnRH 100 micrograms at time 0 plus IV infusion of porcine galanin 500 micrograms in 100 mL saline from -10 to +30 minutes. All results are expressed as the mean +/- SEM. GH peak after GHRH was 14 +/- 5 micrograms/L; porcine galanin significantly increased serum GH (GH peak, 7.3 +/- 1.2) with respect to baseline levels. No significant differences were observed between either GH peak or GH absolute values after galanin as compared with GHRH alone. Porcine galanin significantly enhanced GH response to GHRH (peak, 31.4 +/- 4.4 micrograms/L) with respect to either GHRH or galanin alone. Luteinizing hormone (LH)/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) peaks after GnRH were 16.5 +/- 5.3 and 17.4 +/- 4 IU/L, respectively. Porcine galanin did not cause significant increases in serum LH and FSH levels with respect to baseline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Television advertising for health

In 1985, Losa et al reported that an i.v. bolus injection of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) was able to paradoxically stimulate PRL secretion in more than half of their acromegalic patients. However, this observation was not generally accepted since several other investigators have concluded that such an anomalous PRL response to GHRH was an extremely rare phenomenon in acromegaly. Therefore, in this study we examined a large number (51 patients) of active acromegalics in order to obtain more reliable data on the incidence of the paradoxical PRL response to GHRH in this disorder. Each patient underwent i.v. bolus injections of GHRH (100 micrograms) and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH, 500 micrograms) on separate days, and plasma levels of GH and PRL were measured. The plasma PRL response to GHRH was considered positive (a paradoxical increase) when an increase over baseline of at least 50% occurred. We found that only 6 patients (12%) showed a positive PRL response to GHRH. These PRL-responders to GHRH had higher GH responses to this peptide than PRL-non-responders to GHRH. Although PRL-responders and non-responders to GHRH had a similar PRL responsiveness to TRH, the GH response to TRH was lower in PRL-responders to GHRH than PRL-non-responders to this peptide. In addition, PRL-non-responders to GHRH had lower basal GH and higher basal PRL levels than PRL-responders to GHRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Direct effects of growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) and GH-releasing factor (GRF) on GH secretion from cultured porcine somatotropes

Growth hormone (GH)-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) belongs to the expanding family of synthetic GH secretagogues (GHSs). Previous studies have shown that non-peptidyl GHRP-6 analogues stimulate GH release in vivo in pigs, and interact synergistically with GH-releasing factor (GRF), but its direct effects on porcine somatotropes have not been addressed hitherto. In the present study, we have evaluated the response of cultured porcine pituitary cells to GHRP-6, and its interaction with GRF and somatostatin (SRIF). Secretory response of somatotropes was assessed by using two distinct techniques. GH released by monolayer cell cultures was evaluated by enzyme immunoassay, whereas that secreted by individual somatotropes was measured by immunodensitometry using a cell blotting assay. Our results demonstrate that both GHRP-6 and GRF stimulated GH release from monolayer cultures at doses equal to or above 10(-9) M. Use of cell immunoblot assay demonstrated that, like GRF, the hexapeptide acts directly upon porcine somatotropes to exert its action. Moreover, regardless of the technique applied, combined administration of GHRP-6 (10(-6) or 10(-9) M) and GRF (10(-8) M) resulted in an additive, but not synergistic, stimulatory GH response. Finally, SRIF (10(-7) M) inhibited the stimulatory effect of GHRP-6 alone or in combination with GRF. These results indicate that GHRP-6 directly and effectively stimulates GH secretion from porcine somatotropes in vitro, and acts additively when coadministered with GRF. Therefore, the synergistic stimulatory effect of GHSs and GRF reported in vivo in this species might require additional factors that are lacking in the in vitro situation.     

Psychoneuroendocrinology of depression. Growth hormone

The release of growth hormone (GH) from the anterior pituitary is regulated by hypothalamic peptides especially GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin, which in turn are controlled by classic neurotransmitters such as noradrenaline, dopamine, and acetylcholine, as well as negative feedback from GH and insulin-like growth factor-1. There has been extensive investigation of this axis in patients with depression. The most consistently reported abnormality is in noradrenergic-mediated GH release, which probably occurs via GHRH containing neurones. ACh-induced GH release through the somatostatin system, GABA, and also GHRH-stimulated release are reported as abnormal by some researchers.     

Differential effect of insulin-like growth factor-1 and growth hormone on hypothalamic regulation of growth hormone secretion in the rat

Pharmacological administration of either growth hormone (GH) or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) were reported to inhibit endogenous GH release in humans and in the laboratory animal. We have evaluated the short-term differential mechanisms whereby the two hormones affect hypothalamic regulation of GH secretion. Wistar male rats (90 days old) were injected i.p. with either GH (recombinant GH NIAMDD, Baltimore, MD, USA), rIGF-1 (Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan) or saline. Animals were sacrificed at 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes following injection. Hypothalami were dissected and extracted immediately and the levels of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin were determined using specific antisera. Trunk blood was collected for GH and IGF-1 determination by RIA. Administration of IGF-1 or GH markedly decreased hypothalamic somatostatin stores by 77% and 54% respectively, within 15 minutes. Concomitantly, the wide range of GH levels found in the control group was reduced in the IGF-1 treated group suggesting that the pulsatile pattern of GH secretion was suppressed. Growth hormone administration induced an increase in hypothalamic GHRH stores (60% at 120 minutes). During this period serum IGF-1 levels were not altered. It is suggested that short term modulation of hypothalamic neurohormones by GH and IGF-1 is mediated by rapid stimulation of somatostatin release by both hormones, and inhibition of GHRH release is induced only by GH.