Evidence that an OX-2-positive cell can inhibit the stimulation of type 1 cytokine production by bone marrow-derived B7-1 (and B7-2)-positive dendritic cells

The present study was designed to compare the effects of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on extracellular dopamine (DA) levels in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and the nucleus accumbens (NAC), using in vivo microdialysis with dual probe implantation in awake, freely moving rats. Amperozide (2 and 10 mg/kg), clozapine (5 and 20 mg/kg), and olanzapine (10 mg/kg), all of which are atypical antipsychotics, produced greater increases in extracellular DA levels in the mPFC than in the NAC. Olanzapine (1 mg/kg), risperidone (0.1 and 1 mg/kg), also an atypical antipsychotic, and S-(-)-sulpiride (25 mg/kg), a typical antipsychotic, produced comparable increases in extracellular DA levels in the mPFC and the NAC. S-(-)-sulpiride (10 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.1 and 1 mg/kg), another typical antipsychotic, significantly increased extracellular DA levels in the NAC but not in the mPFC. The effects of the six antipsychotic drugs to increase extracellular DA levels in the mPFC relative to those in the NAC was positively correlated with the difference between their pKi values for serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT2A) and DA-D2 receptors and was inversely correlated to their pKi values for D2 or D3 receptors, but was not for 5-HT2A receptors alone. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the ability of antipsychotic drugs to produce a greater increase in prefrontal compared with NAC extracellular DA levels may be related, in part, to weak D2 and D3 receptor affinity relative to 5-HT2A receptor antagonism.     

Survey on the pharmacodynamics of the new antipsychotic risperidone

This review reports on the pharmacodynamics of the new antipsychotic risperidone. The primary action of risperidone is serotonin 5-HT2 receptor blockade as shown by displacement of radioligand binding (Ki: 0.16 nM), activity on isolated tissues (EC50: 0.5 nM), and antagonism of peripherally (ED50: 0.0011 mg/kg) and centrally (ED50: 0.014 mg/kg) acting 5-HT2 receptor agonists in rats. Risperidone is at least as potent as the specific 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ritanserin in these tests. Risperidone is also a potent dopamine D2 receptor antagonist as indicated by displacement of radioligand binding (Ki: 1.4 nM), activity in isolated striatal slices (IC50: 0.89 nM), and antagonism of peripherally (ED50: 0.0057 mg/kg in dogs) and centrally acting D2 receptor agonists (ED50: 0.056-0.15 mg/kg in rats). Risperidone shows all effects common to D2 antagonists, including enhancement of prolactin release. However, some central effects such as catalepsy and blockade of motor activity occur at high doses only. Risperidone is 4-10 times less potent than haloperidol as a central D2 antagonist in rats and it differs from haloperidol by the following characteristics: predominant 5-HT2 antagonism; LSD antagonism; effects on sleep; smooth dose-response curves for D2 antagonism; synergism of combined 5-HT2/D2 antagonism; pronounced effects on amphetamine-induced oxygen consumption; increased social interaction; and pronounced effects on dopamine (DA) turnover. Risperidone displays similar activity at pre- and postsynaptic D2 receptors and at D2 receptors from various rat brain regions. The binding affinity for D4 and D3 receptors is 5 and 9 times weaker, respectively, than for D2 receptors; interaction with D1 receptors occurs only at very high concentrations. The pharmacological profile of risperidone includes interaction with histamine H1 and alpha-adrenergic receptors but the compound is devoid of significant interaction with cholinergic and a variety of other types of receptors. Risperidone has excellent oral activity, a rapid onset, and a 24-h duration of action. Its major metabolite, 9-hydroxyrisperidone, closely mimics risperidone in pharmacodynamics. Risperidone can be characterized as a potent D2 antagonist with predominant 5HT2 antagonistic activity and optimal pharmacokinetic properties.     

5-HT1C receptor-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis in the rat choroid plexus after chronic treatment with clozapine

Chronic treatment with clozapine (14 days; 10 and 25 mg/kg/day) decreases 5-HT1C receptor density but not affinity in rat choroid plexus measured with [3H]mesulergine. We now report the effects of the same clozapine treatment regimens on the function of 5-HT1C receptors (measured by maximal stimulation of 5-HT1C receptor-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis) in relation to receptor changes in rat choroid plexus. Quantitative 5-HT1C receptor autoradiography indicated that chronic clozapine treatment decreased, in a dose-related manner, 5-HT1C receptor binding sites labeled by antagonist ([3H]mesulergine) and agonist ([125I](+/-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane, [125I]DOI) radioligands. However, only the higher dose of clozapine decreased statistically significantly the maximal 5-HT1C receptor-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis response. Chronic administration of haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg/day) did not change any of the 5-HT1C receptor parameters. In conclusion, chronic clozapine treatment is able to modulate the function of 5-HT1C receptors. This further strengthens the possibility that 5-HT1C receptors may contribute to some of the atypical effects of clozapine.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of the atypical neuroleptic clozapine in rats: tests with subtype selective receptor ligands

The interoceptive stimulus induced by clozapine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) has been characterized in an operant drug discrimination procedure in the rat using a wide range of receptor subtype-selective agonists and antagonists. Only the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine generalized fully to clozapine (>80%). Partial generalization (defined here as 40% maximal generalization) was seen with the D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (43% maximal generalization), the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (67%) and the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist methoxyidazoxan (42%). All other specific agents tested induced <25% maximal generalization, including the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine (24%), the histamine H1 receptor antagonist mepyramine (21%), the D2 antagonist typical neuroleptic haloperidol (23%), the D4 receptor antagonist L-745,870 (14%), the 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT1A) receptor agonist S-14506 (8%), the 5-HT2A receptor antagonists ketanserin (0%) and M100907 (12%), the 5-HT2B/2C receptor antagonists SB 200646A (8%) and SDZ SER 082 (6%), and the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron (0%). The clozapine discriminative stimulus was not blocked by the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390, or by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635, when given concomitantly with clozapine. Although the results suggest that muscarinic antagonism plays a major role in the clozapine cue, the results have to be considered in the light of the full generalization to clozapine seen with various antipsychotic agents which have very low affinity for muscarinic receptors, including zotepine, quetiapine, JL13 and PNU 96415 (a finding replicated in rats from the same breeding colony as those which generalized to scopolamine). Thus, generalization to clozapine for antipsychotics with multiple affinities but with low muscarinic affinity is probably mediated by additive or perhaps supra-additive actions at other receptors, although extensive studies with various combinations of drug mixtures are required to validate this hypothesis.     

Long-term treatment with haloperidol or clozapine does not affect dopamine D4 receptors in rat frontal cortex

We examined the effects of long-term treatment with haloperidol and clozapine on dopamine D4 receptors in rat frontal cortex. Dopamine D4 receptor binding sites were indirectly determined from the displacement experiments of [3H]clozapine binding using nemonapride. Three-weeks administration of haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg) or clozapine (10 mg/kg) did not significantly affect the D4 receptors in the frontal cortex. The density of D2 receptors, determined by [3H]spiperone binding to striatum, was increased by long-term treatment with haloperidol, but it was not significantly changed by that with clozapine.     

Differential effects of clozapine and haloperidol on dopamine receptor mRNA expression in rat striatum and cortex

The regulation of the dopamine (DA) receptors is of considerable interest, in part because treatment with antipsychotic drugs is known to upregulate striatal D2-like receptors. While previous studies have focused on the regulation of striatal DA receptors, less is known about the pharmacological regulation of cortical DA receptors. The purpose of this study was to examine the regulation of DA mRNA receptor expression in the cortex compared to the striatum following treatment with antipsychotic agents. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected daily with haloperidol (2 mg/kg/day), clozapine (20 mg/kg/day) or a control vehicle for a period of 14 days. Following treatment, brains were subjected to in situ hybridization for the mRNAs encoding the five dopamine receptors; only D1, D2, and D3 receptor mRNAs were detected in these regions. Haloperidol tended to either modestly upregulate or have no effect on dopamine receptor mRNAs detected in striatal structures, while clozapine generally downregulated these mRNAs. On the other hand, in the cortex, both drugs had striking effects on D1 and D2 mRNA levels. Cortical D1 mRNA was upregulated by haloperidol, but this effect was primarily restricted to cingulate cortex; clozapine also upregulated D1 mRNA, but primarily in parietal regions. Haloperidol downregulated D2 mRNA in the majority of cortical regions, but most dramatically in frontal and cingulate regions; clozapine typically upregulated this mRNA, but primarily in regions other than frontal and cingulate cortex. These results indicate that clozapine and haloperidol each have regionally-specific effects, and differentially regulate dopamine receptor mRNA expression in striatal and cortical regions of the rat brain.     

Identification of genetic markers associated with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome in an Afrikaner population

The noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists dizocilpine and phencyclidine cause behavioral changes in animals that can be blocked by antipsychotic agents, implicating NMDA receptors in the expression of schizophrenic symptoms. In the present study, we examined the effects of dizocilpine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg s.c.) on locomotor activity and on the expression of c-fos and hsp-70 immediate-early genes (IEGs) in mice. Results indicate that dizocilpine increases locomotor activity and selectively increases the expression of c-fos and hsp-70 in the posterior cingulate cortex. Haloperidol (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (0.6-1.25 mg/kg) block both the locomotor response and the increased IEG immunoreactivity induced by dizocilpine (0.6 mg/kg). The 5-HT2 antagonists ritanserin (0.06-0.25 mg/kg), ketanserin (0.03-0.12 mg/kg) and amesergide (0. 3-1.25 mg/kg) also significantly attenuated the locomotor response to dizocilpine. Haloperidol and clozapine suppressed the head weaving induced by dizocilpine, but ritanserin, as previously reported did not. Although some attenuation of the c-fos and hsp-70 immunoreactivity was seen with the 5-HT2 antagonists it was less pronounced than that induced by haloperidol or clozapine. In conclusion, 5-HT2 antagonists as well as antipsychotic compounds attenuate the locomotor response to dizocilpine in mice. Haloperidol and clozapine appear to be more effective, however, in attenuating the expression of c-fos and hsp-70 in the posterior cingulate gyrus than 5-HT2 antagonists ritanserin, ketanserin or amesergide. We thus have seen a dissociation in the capacity of compounds to alter the effects on behavior and IEG expression after dizocilpine administration.     

Clozapine, haloperidol, and the D4 antagonist PNU-101387G: in vivo effects on mesocortical, mesolimbic, and nigrostriatal dopamine and serotonin release

With in vivo microvoltammetry, the dopamine (DA) receptor antagonists, clozapine (D4/D2), haloperidol (D2) and the selective D4 antagonist, PNU-101387G, were evaluated for their effects on DA and serotonin (5-HT) release within A10 neuronal terminal fields [mesocortical, prefrontal cortex (PFC), mesolimbic, nucleus accumbens, (NAcc)] and within A9 neuronal terminal fields [nigrostriatal, caudate putamen (CPU)], in chloral hydrate anesthetized rats. Clozapine, which also has 5-HT2 receptor antagonist properties, significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within A10 terminal fields, PFC and NAcc; DA release was not increased by clozapine within A9 terminals, CPU. Serotonin release was significantly (p < 0.001) increased by clozapine within A10 and A9 terminal fields. Haloperidol significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within PFC, dramatically and significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within CPU, but not within NAcc; haloperidol had a small but statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase on 5-HT release within PFC [only at the highest dose studied (2.5 mg/kg)] and within CPU [only at the lowest dose studied 1.0 mg/kg) (p < 0.05)]. The selective D4 antagonist, PNU-101387G dramatically and significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within PFC, modestly, but significantly (p < 0.001) increased DA release within CPU, did not alter DA release within NAcc at the lowest dose studied (1.0 mg/kg) and significantly (p < 0.05) decreased DA release within NAcc at the highest dose studied (1.0 mg/kg). The selective D4 antagonist did not affect 5-HT release within either A10 or A9 terminal fields. The present data are discussed in terms of the neurochemistry, antipsychotic activity, and side effect profiles of clozapine and haloperidol, in order to provide comparative profiles for a selective D4 antagonist, PNU-101387G.     

Risperidone compared with new and reference antipsychotic drugs: in vitro and in vivo receptor binding

Risperidone and its active metabolite 9-OH-risperidone were compared to reference antipsychotic drugs (haloperidol, pipamperone, fluspirilene, clozapine, zotepine) and compounds under development (olanzapine, seroquel, sertindole, ORG-5222, ziprasidone) for in vitro binding to neurotransmitter receptors in brain tissue and on membranes of recombinant cells expressing cloned human receptors and for in vivo occupancy of neurotransmitter receptors in rat and guinea-pig brain following acute treatment (2 h., s.c.). An ex vivo autoradiography technique was applied to determine the receptor occupancy by the drugs administered in vivo. Of particular interest are the central 5HT2A receptors and D2-type receptors. Predominant 5HT2A receptor antagonism is supposed to add to an atypical profile of the antipsychotics (treatment of the negative symptoms, low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects). D2 antagonism is required the treatment of positive symptoms. A contribution of the new dopamine receptor subtypes D3 and in particular D4 receptors has been proposed. In vitro, all compounds, except the 'typical' antipsychotics haloperidol and fluspirilene, showed higher affinity for 5HT2A than for D2 receptors. Subnanomolar affinity for human 5HT2A receptors was observed for ORG-5222, sertindole, risperidone, 9-OH-risperidone and ziprasidone. Fluspirilene, ORG-5222, haloperidol, ziprasidone, risperidone, 9-OH-risperidone and zotepine displayed nanomolar affinity for human D2 receptors. Sertindole and olanzapine were slightly less potent. Pipamperone, clozapine and seroquel showed 2 orders of magnitude lower D2 affinity in vitro. Clozapine, but even more so pipamperone, displayed higher affinity for D4 than for D2 receptors. For most other compounds, D4 affinity was only slightly lower than their D2 affinity. Seroquel was totally devoid of D4 affinity. None of the compounds had nanomolar affinity for D1 receptors; their affinity for D3 receptors was usually slightly lower than for D2 receptors. In vivo, ORG-5222, risperidone, pipamperone, 9-OH-risperidone, sertindole, olanzapine, zotepine and clozapine maintained a higher potency for occupying 5HT2A than D2 receptors. Risperidone and ORG-5222 had 5HT2A versus D2 potency ratio of about 20. Highest potency for 5HT2A receptor occupancy was observed for ORG-5222 followed by risperidone and olanzapine. Ziprasidone exclusively occupied 5HT2A receptors. ORG-5222, haloperidol, fluspirilene and olanzapine showed the highest potency for occupying D2 receptors. No regional selectivity for D2 receptor occupancy in mesolimbic versus nigrostriatal areas was detected for any of the test compounds. Risperidone was conspicuous because of its more gradual occupancy of D2 receptors; none of the other compounds showed this property. The various compounds also displayed high to moderate occupancy of adrenergic alpha 1 receptors, except fluspirilene and ziprasidone. Clozapine, zotepine, ORG-5222 and sertindole occupied even more alpha 1 than D2 receptors. Clozapine showed predominant occupancy of H1 receptors and occupied cholinergic receptors with equivalent potency to D2 receptors. A stronger predominance of 5HT2A versus D2 receptor occupancy combined with a more gradual occupancy of D2 receptors differentiates risperidone and its 9-OH-metabolite from the other antipsychotic compounds in this study. The predominant 5HT2A receptor occupancy probably plays a role in the beneficial action of risperidone on the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, whereas maintenance of a moderate occupancy of D2 receptors seems adequate for treating the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. A combined 5HT2A and D2 occupancy and the avoidance of D2 receptor overblockade are believed to reduce the risk for extrapyra     

S 16924 ((R)-2-[1-[2-(2,3-dihydro-benzo[1,4] dioxin-5-Yloxy)-ethyl]-pyrrolidin-3yl]-1-(4-fluoro-phenyl)-ethanone), a novel, potential antipsychotic with marked serotonin (5-HT)1A agonist properties: I. Receptorial and neurochemical profile in comparison with clozapine and haloperidol

S 16924 showed a pattern of interaction at multiple (>20) native, rodent and cloned, human (h) monoaminergic receptors similar to that of clozapine and different to that of haloperidol. Notably, like clozapine, the affinity of S 16924 for hD2 and hD3 receptors was modest, and it showed 5-fold higher affinity for hD4 receptors. At each of these sites, using a [35S]GTPgammaS binding procedure, S 16924, clozapine and haloperidol behaved as antagonists. In distinction to haloperidol, S 16924 shared the marked affinity of clozapine for h5-HT2A and h5-HT2C receptors. However, an important difference to clozapine (and haloperidol) was the high affinity of S 16924 for h5-HT1A receptors. At these sites, using a [35S]GTPgammaS binding model, both S 16924 and clozapine behaved as partial agonists, whereas haloperidol was inactive. In vivo, the agonist properties of S 16924 at 5-HT1A autoreceptors were revealed by its ability to potently inhibit the firing of raphe-localized serotoninergic neurones, an action reversed by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100,635. In contrast, clozapine and haloperidol only weakly inhibited raphe firing, and their actions were resistant to WAY 100,635. Similarly, S 16924 more potently inhibited striatal turnover of 5-HT than either clozapine or haloperidol. Reflecting its modest affinity for D2 (and D3) autoreceptors, S 16924 only weakly blocked the inhibitory influence of the dopaminergic agonist, apomorphine, upon the firing rate of ventrotegmental area-localized dopaminergic neurones. Further, S 16924 only weakly increased striatal, mesolimbic and mesocortical turnover of dopamine (DA). Clozapine was, similarly, weakly active in these models, whereas haloperidol, in line with its higher affinity at D2 (and D3) receptors, was potently active. In the frontal cortex (FCX) of freely moving rats, S 16924 dose-dependently reduced dialysate levels of 5-HT, whereas those of DA and NAD were dose-dependently increased in the same samples. In contrast, although S 16924 also suppressed 5-HT levels in the striatum and nucleus accumbens, DA levels therein were unaffected. Clozapine mimicked this selective increase in DA levels in the FCX as compared to striatum and accumbens. In contrast, haloperidol modestly increased DA levels in the FCX, striatum and accumbens to the same extent. In distinction to S 16924, clozapine and haloperidol exerted little influence upon 5-HT levels. Finally, the influence of S 16924 upon FCX levels of 5-HT, DA (and NAD) was attenuated by WAY 100,635. In conclusion, S 16924 possesses a profile of interaction at multiple monoaminergic receptors comparable to that of clozapine and distinct to that of haloperidol. In addition, S 16924 is a potent, partial agonist at 5-HT1A receptors. Correspondingly, acute administration of S 16924 decreases cerebral serotoninergic transmission and selectively reinforces frontocortical as compared to subcortical dopaminergic transmission. In line with these actions, S 16924 shows a distinctive profile of activity in functional (behavioral) models of potential antipsychotic activity (companion paper).     

The power of support groups: influence on infant feeding trends in New Zealand

The effect of streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetes and a combination of chronic treatment with haloperidol (HPD) on dopamine (DA)D2, serotonin (5-HT) 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors was investigated in rat brain. Rats were randomly assigned to one of four groups: vehicle-vehicle, STZ-vehicle, vehicle-HPD, and STZ-HPD groups. Four weeks after single administration of STZ (65 mg/kg IV) or vehicle (citrate buffer), rats received depot HPD (4 mg/kg IM) or vehicle (sesame oil) once a week for 4 weeks. Sixteen days after the last injection of HPD or vehicle, rats were sacrificed, and the density of binding sites was determined using [3H]spiperone as ligand in the striatum (D2),[3H]8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propyl)-aminotetraline in the hippocampus (5-HT1A), and [3H]ketanserin in the frontal cortex (5-HT2A). The density of D2 receptors was significantly increased in the vehicle-HPD compared to vehicle-vehicle controls. However, striatal D2 receptor density of the STZ-HPD and the STZ-vehicle were not significantly different from the vehicle-vehicle group. A significant increase in cortical 5-HT2A receptor density was observed only in the group of STZ-vehicle. Treatment with STZ, HPD, or the combination thereof, did not affect the density of 5-HT1A receptors. The affinity constants for D2, 5-HT1A, and 5-HT2A receptors were not affected by any treatment. These results suggest that diabetic state may affect brain serotonergic activity via an increase in the density of 5-HT2A receptors. This may indicate an increased vulnerability to major depression in patients with diabetes. The lack of an effect of the combined chronic treatment with STZ and HPD on the D2 receptor density may correspond to the increased risk to develop tardive dyskinesia in patients with diabetes.     

NMDA receptor antagonists block stress-induced prolactin release in female rats at estrus

In order to evaluate the role of glutamate in prolactin secretion, we examined the effects of N-methyl-D,L-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonists on serum prolactin levels at both resting and restraint-stress conditions in female rats at estrus. NMDA increased basal serum prolactin levels. Administration of the selective NMDA receptor antagonist, cis-4-phosphonomethyl-2-piperidine carboxylic acid (CGS 19755) (5 and 10 mg/kg i.p.), to rats under resting conditions enhanced basal prolactin levels. A low dose of CGS 19755 (3 mg/kg) was unable to modify the hormone serum level. Under stress conditions the pretreatment with CGS 19755 (3 and 5 mg/kg) prevented the increase in serum prolactin levels. This effect was reversed by NMDA (60 mg/kg s.c.). The NMDA receptor antagonist (5 mg/kg) decreased the median eminence concentration of the dopamine metabolite, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), without modifying dopamine content. To examine the probable link between serotonin (5-HT) and glutamate in prolactin release, the 5-HT2A/5-HT2C receptor antagonist, ritanserin, was used. Under resting conditions, a dose of 5 mg/kg s.c. blocked the NMDA-induced prolactin release. In rats submitted to restraint, ritanserin decreased the prolactin response and NMDA was unable to correct the stress serum prolactin levels. The 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-hidroxypropyl-amino tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (3 mg/kg s.c.), increased basal serum prolactin levels and restored serum prolactin in stressed animals pretreated with CGS 19755 (5 mg/kg). The present data strongly suggest that the glutamatergic system participates in the regulation of prolactin secretion. A stimulation tone seems to be exerted via the tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic system, and the prolactin release evoked by restraint apparently involves glutamate/NMDA receptors linked to a serotoninergic pathway.     

In vivo electrophysiological characterization of 5-HT receptors in the guinea pig head of caudate nucleus and orbitofrontal cortex

The aim of the present study was to characterize in vivo the 5-HT receptor subtypes which mediate the effect of microiontophoretic applied 5-HT in the guinea pig head of caudate nucleus and orbitofrontal cortex. 5-HT and the preferential 5-HT2A receptor agonist DOI and the preferential 5-HT2C receptor agonist mCPP, suppressed the quisqualate (QUIS)-induced activation of neurons in both structures. The inhibitory effect of DOI and mCPP was not prevented by acute intravenous administration of the 5-HT1/2 receptor antagonist metergoline (2 mg/kg) and the 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist ritanserin (2 mg/kg) in the two regions nor by the selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL100907 (1 mg/kg) in the head of caudate nucleus. However, the inhibitory effect of DOI, but not that of mCPP, was antagonized by a 4-day treatment with metergoline and ritanserin (2 mg/kg/day; using minipumps implanted subcutaneously) in head of caudate nucleus, but not in orbitofrontal cortex. Microiontophoretic ejection of the 5-HT1A/7 receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT and of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 both suppressed the spontaneous and QUIS-activated firing activity of orbitofrontal cortex neurons. At current which did not affect the basal discharge activity of the neuron recorded, microiontophoretic application of WAY100635 and BMY7378 failed to prevent the inhibitory effect of 8-OH-DPAT. The inhibitory effect of gepirone, which is a 5-HT1A receptor agonist but devoid of affinity for 5-HT7 receptors, was also not antagonized by WAY100635. Altogether, these results suggest the presence of atypical 5-HT1A receptors in the orbitofrontal cortex. The present results also indicate that the suppressant effect of DOI may be mediated by 5-HT2A receptors in head of caudate nucleus and atypical 5-HT2 receptors in orbitofrontal cortex.     

Hexadecylphosphocholine and 2-modified 1,3-diacylglycerols as effectors of phospholipase D

The effects of mesulergine (100 and 200 microg/kg s.c.), SB 206553 (1 and 2.5 mg/kg i.p.), RP 62203 (2.5 and 4 mg/kg i.p.) and ritanserin (630 microg/kg i.p.) were studied on the extracellular concentration of dopamine (DA) and dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) in the nucleus accumbens of chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats, using intracerebral microdialysis. Mesulergine, a non selective serotonin2C/2B/2A (5-HT2C/2B/2A) receptor antagonist, significantly increased DA release, which reached a peak level (+ 20%) 60 min after drug injection and slowly returned back to baseline values. Mesulergine also caused a dose-dependent increase in DOPAC outflow. Pretreatment with mesulergine (200 microg/kg) did not change the inhibition of DA release induced by apomorphine (100 microg/kg), whereas it prevented the reduction of DOPAC outflow induced by apomorphine (100 microg/kg). Administration of SB 206553, a selective blocker of 5-HT2C/2B receptors, dose-dependently increased DA outflow. The dose of 2.5 mg/kg SB 206553 caused a linear increase of DA output which reached a peak (+75%) 40 min after injection, while 1 mg/kg induced a more gradual increase of DA release which peaked (+54%) 60 min after administration of the drug. Treatment with RP 62203, a selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, did not produce any significant effect on DA outflow. Administration of ritanserin, a mixed 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist, did not cause any significant change of DA and DOPAC outflow. Taken together, these data indicate that selective blockade of 5-HT2/2B receptor subtypes increases DA release in the rat nucleus accumbens.     

Evidence that RU 24969-induced locomotor activity in C57/B1/6 mice is specifically mediated by the 5-HT1B receptor

1. The behavioural effects of the 5-HT1B receptor agonists, RU 24969 and CGS 12066B, have been investigated in C57/B1/6 mice. 2. RU 24969 (1-30 mg kg-1) produced intense and prolonged hyperlocomotion and other behavioural changes. 3. CGS 12066B caused similar effects, but they were much less pronounced, inconsistent and transient irrespective of whether this drug was given i.p. (1-15 mg kg-1) or i.c.v. (0.2-40 micrograms). However, CGS 12066B (7.5 and 15 mg kg-1) caused a dose-related inhibition of RU 24969 (7.5 mg kg-1)-induced hyperlocomotion indicating that the former is a 5-HT1B partial agonist. 4. RU 24969 (7.5 mg kg-1 i.p.)-induced hyperlocomotion was inhibited by the (-)-, but not (+)-isomers of pindolol (4 mg kg-1) and propranolol (20 mg kg-1) but not by metoprolol (10 mg kg-1) or ICI 118,551 (5 mg kg-1), consistent with an involvement of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B receptors. 5. The response was not altered by the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100135 (5 mg kg-1, s.c.), the 5-HT2A/5-HT2C receptor antagonist, ritanserin (0.1 mg kg-1), the selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron (1 mg kg-1) or the non-selective 5-HT receptor antagonists methysergide (3 mg kg-1) and metergoline (3 mg kg-1). 6. Although spiroxatrine (0.1 mg kg-1) and ketanserin (1 mg kg-1) inhibited RU 24969-induced hyperlocomotion, these effects were probably due to antagonism of dopamine D2 receptors and alpha 1-adrenoceptors respectively. 7. Taken together, these results indicate that RU 24969-induced hyperlocomotion results specifically from activation of central 5-HTIB receptors.8. Lesioning of 5-HT neurones with 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (75 microg, i.c.v.) or depletion with pchlorophenylalanine(200 mg kg-1, i.p. for 14 days) had no effect on RU 24969-induced hyperlocomotiondemonstrating that the 5-HTIB receptors involved are postsynaptic and that they do not show super sensitivity.9. The involvement of other monoamine neurotransmitter systems in RU 24969-induced hyperlocomotionwas also examined. The response was inhibited by the al-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin(1 mg kg-1), the dopamine DI receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (0.05 mg kg-1) and the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, BRL 34778 (0.03 mg kg-1), but not by the M2-adrenoceptor antagonist, idazoxan(1 mg kg-1). Lesioning noradrenergic neurones with N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine(100 mg kg-1) markedly attenuated this behaviour. These results show that the hyperlocomotion is expressed via noradrenergic and dopaminergic neurones acting on alpha 1-adrenoceptors, DI and D2 receptors.10. RU 24969 decreased brain concentrations of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid whilst simultaneously increasing 5-HT, consistent with the reduction of 5-HT neuronal activity by activation of 5-HTlA and 5-HTIB autoreceptors. RU 24969 increased brain 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol, but not noradrenaline, concentrations which supports the involvement of noradrenergic neurones in the expression of hyperlocomotion. RU 24969 did not alter dopamine, dihydroxyphenylacetic acid or homovanillic acid concentrations in the nucleus accumbens suggesting that the dopaminergic neurones terminating there are not directly involved.     

Biological profile of L-745,870, a selective antagonist with high affinity for the dopamine D4 receptor

L-745,870,(3-([4-(4-chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl)-1H- pyrollo[2,3-b] pyridine, was identified as a selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist with excellent oral bioavailability and brain penetration. L-745,870 displaced specific binding of 0.2 nM [3H] spiperone to cloned human dopamine D4 receptors with a binding affinity (Ki) of 0. 43 nM which was 5- and 20-fold higher than that of the standard antipsychotics haloperidol and clozapine, respectively. L-745,870 exhibited high selectivity for the dopamine D4 receptor (>2000 fold) compared to other dopamine receptor subtypes and had moderate affinity for 5HT2, sigma and alpha adrenergic receptors(IC50 < 300 nM). In vitro, L-745,870 (0.1-1 microM) exhibited D4 receptor antagonist activity, reversing dopamine (1 microM) mediated 1) inhibition of adenylate cyclase in hD4HEK and hD4CHO cells; 2) stimulation of [35S] GTPgammaS binding and 3) stimulation of extracellular acidification rate, but did not exhibit any significant intrinsic activity in these assays. Although standard antipsychotics increase dopamine metabolism or plasma prolactin levels in rodents, L-745,870 (相似文献   

Clozapine and haloperidol block the induction of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine and associated genomic responses in rats

Behavioral sensitization resulting from repeated, intermittent exposure to psychostimulants such as amphetamine (Amp) is hypothesized to model pathophysiology of psychotic disorders. The present study was designed to characterize the effects of a typical and an atypical antipsychotic drug, haloperidol and clozapine, respectively, on the induction of context-independent sensitization to Amp. Peripheral Amp treatment for five days (2 mg/kg/day, s.c.) produced an augmented stimulant response to an acute Amp challenge (2 mg/kg, s.c.) given seven days after the last pretreatment injection. Interestingly, preexposure to high doses of either clozapine (20 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg) alone also led to a sensitized behavioral response to an acute Amp challenge. The cross-sensitization between Amp and high doses of the haloperidol and clozapine may have occluded any blockade of Amp behavioral sensitization by the antipsychotics. Indeed, administration of a lower dose of clozapine (4 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) with Amp during the preexposure phase clearly blocked the induction of behavioral sensitization. In addition to the behavioral sensitization, Amp-pretreated rats showed a reduction in the ability of the acute Amp challenge to induce c-fos mRNA in the medial prefrontal cortex and neurotensin/neuromedin N (NT/N) mRNA in the nucleus accumbens-shell. At doses that blocked the initiation of behavioral sensitization to Amp, clozapine fully and haloperidol partially restored the capacity of acute Amp to induce c-fos and NT/N gene expression. These data lend support to the psychostimulant-sensitization model of psychosis and a role of dopamine D2-like receptors in the phenomenon.     

Emergency coronary artery surgery after failed PTCA: myocardial protection with continuous coronary perfusion of beta-blocker-enriched blood

MK-801 (dizocilpine), a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, induces dystonia in monkeys at doses of 0.08 mg/kg. This syndrome was tested with the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist NNC 756, the DA D2 receptor antagonist raclopride, the atypical antipsychotic clozapine, the dopamine D1 receptor agonist SKF 81297, the dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist quinpirole, the anticholinergic biperiden, amphetamine, and the benzodiazepine midazolam in 7 Cebus apella monkeys previously treated with dopaminergic agents. NNC 756 (0.004 and 0.01 mg/kg), raclopride (0.004 and 0.01 mg/kg), SKF 81297 (0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg), quinpirole (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg), amphetamine (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), and biperiden (0.125 and up to 1.0 mg/kg), had no significant effect on MK-801-induced dystonia. In contrast, both clozapine (2.0 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.4 and 1.0 mg/kg) reduced the dystonia caused by MK-801. Dystonia induced by dopamine D1 and D2 antagonists is easily antagonized by biperiden and dopamine agonists, whereas these drugs had no significant effect on MK-801-induced dystonia. It has been proposed that dystonia may be caused by a sudden drop in the output from the basal ganglia that is primarily GABAergic. Midazolam's enhancing effect on the GABAergic tone is consistent with this hypothesis. The effect of clozapine is more difficult to explain, but this drug has a rich pharmacology and suggests an agonistic glutamatergic effect.     

Iodine-123-iodobenzamide SPECT assessment of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in riperidone-treated schizophrenic patients

The recently introduced neuroleptic, risperidone, was expected to block fewer dopamine D2 receptors than typical neuroleptics (e.g., haloperidol), but at comparable potency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of dopamine D2 receptor occupancy in relation to the neuroleptic dosage and to correlate the findings with the presence of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Additionally, the data were compared to previous iodobenzamide (IBZM) SPECT findings in patients treated with other neuroleptics, haloperidol and clozapine. METHODS: In 20 patients with schizophrenia [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Third Edition-Revised)] treated with mean daily doses of risperidone ranging from 0.029 to 0.128 mg/kg body weight, SPECT was performed 2 hr after intravenous injection of 185 MBq 123I-IBZM, a selective dopamine D2 receptor ligand. Striatal IBZM binding was assessed by calculating a striatal/frontal cortex ratio, expressed as a percentage of the control value. RESULTS: Selective dopamine D2 receptor binding of the ligand was reduced in all treated patients, with binding values ranging from 7% to 68%. The degree of occupancy displayed an exponential dose-response relationship (r = -0.86; p < 0.0001). The slope of the curve was between those of haloperidol and clozapine but was closer and more similar in shape to the curve of haloperidol. Extrapyramidal symptoms were observed in 8 of 20 patients with binding values between 7% and 47%. However, there was no clear relationship between the degree of receptor occupancy and the presence of EPS. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest an exponential dose-response relationship between the daily dosage of risperidone and the dopamine D2 receptor occupancy. The blockade of specific striatal IBZM binding found under therapy with risperidone is between those of haloperidol and clozapine. The dose-response curve for risperidone, however, shows greater similarity to that of haloperidol.     

Preferential involvement of D3 versus D2 dopamine receptors in the effects of dopamine receptor ligands on oral ethanol self-administration in rats

There is evidence that dopamine transmission is involved in reinforcement processes and the present study investigated the relative involvement of D3 versus D2 dopamine receptors in the effects of dopamine ligands on the reinforcing action of ethanol. Rats were trained to self-administer ethanol (10% v/v) orally in a free-choice two-lever operant task using a saccharin-fading procedure. When preference in responding for ethanol over water had developed the rats were tested with several dopamine agonists and antagonists. Pretreatment with the non-selective dopamine agonist, apomorphine (0.01-0.1 mg/kg), the preferential D2 agonist, bromocriptine (1-10 mg/kg) and the selective D3 agonists, 7-OH-DPAT (0.003-0.1 mg/kg), PD 128907 (0.1-3 mg/kg), (+)3PPP (0.3-3 mg/kg), quinelorane (0.0001-0.003 mg/kg) and quinpirole (0.003-0.03 mg/kg), resulted in dose-dependent decreases in responding for ethanol. The relative potencies of the dopamine agonists to decrease ethanol self-administration were highly correlated with their published potencies to produce in vitro functional D3 but not D2 responses. Active doses could be considered as those selectively stimulating receptors involved in the control of dopamine release, suggesting that reduction of dopamine transmission was associated with a decrease in ethanol-reinforced responding. This conclusion was further supported by the finding that pretreatment with the D2/D3 dopamine antagonists, haloperidol (0.1-0.4 mg/kg) and tiapride (10-60 mg/kg), decreased responding for ethanol at doses which have been shown previously to block dopamine transmission.