Thermophysical Properties of ZrB2 and ZrB2–SiC Ceramics

Thermophysical properties were investigated for zirconium diboride (ZrB₂) and ZrB₂–30 vol% silicon carbide (SiC) ceramics. Thermal conductivities were calculated from measured thermal diffusivities, heat capacities, and densities. The thermal conductivity of ZrB₂ increased from 56 W (m K)⁻¹ at room temperature to 67 W (m K)⁻¹ at 1675 K, whereas the thermal conductivity of ZrB₂–SiC decreased from 62 to 56 W (m K)⁻¹ over the same temperature range. Electron and phonon contributions to thermal conductivity were determined using electrical resistivity measurements and were used, along with grain size models, to explain the observed trends. The results are compared with previously reported thermal conductivities for ZrB₂ and ZrB₂–SiC.     

Thermal and Electric Properties in Hot-Pressed ZrB2–MoSi2–SiC Composites

The thermal and electrical properties of MoSi₂ and/or SiC-containing ZrB₂-based composites and the effects of MoSi₂ and SiC contents were examined in hot-pressed ZrB₂–MoSi₂–SiC composites. The thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity of the ZrB₂–MoSi₂–SiC composites were measured at room temperature by a nanoflash technique and a current–voltage method, respectively. The results indicate that the thermal and electrical conductivities of ZrB₂–MoSi₂–SiC composites are dependent on the amount of MoSi₂ and SiC. The thermal conductivities observed for all of the compositions were more than 75 W·(m·K)⁻¹. A maximum conductivity of 97.55 W·(m·K)⁻¹ was measured for the 20 vol% MoSi₂-30 vol% SiC-containing ZrB₂ composite. On the other hand, the electrical conductivities observed for all of the compositions were in the range from 4.07 × 10–8.11 × 10 Ω⁻¹·cm⁻¹.     

Solution-Based Synthesis of Submicrometer ZrB2 and ZrB2–TaB2

Zirconium diboride and a zirconium diboride/tantalum diboride mixture were synthesized by solution-based processing. Zirconium n -propoxide was refluxed with 2,4-pentanedione to form zirconium diketonate. This compound hydrolyzed in a controllable fashion to form a zirconia precursor. Boria and carbon precursors were formed via solution additions of phenol–formaldehyde and boric acid, respectively. Tantalum oxide precursors were formed similarly as zirconia precursors, in which tantalum ethoxide was used. Solutions were concentrated, dried, pyrolyzed (800°–1100°C, 2 h, flowing argon), and exposed to carbothermal reduction heat treatments (1150°–1800°C, 2 h, flowing argon). Spherical particles of 200–600 nm for pure ZrB₂ and ZrB₂–TaB₂ mixtures were formed.     

A Study of the Phase Relations of ZrO2–TiO2 and ZrO2–TiO2–SiO2

The phase relations of the systems ZrO₂–TiO₂ and ZrO₂–TiO₂–SiO₂ were investigated. X-ray diffraction techniques served as the principal means of analysis. The binary system ZrO₂–TiO₂ was found to be one of partial solid solutions with no intermediate compounds. A eutectic point was found to exist at 50 to 55 weight % ZrO₂ and 1600°C. A preliminary investigation of the ternary system ZrO₂–TiO₂–SiO₂, although not extensive, resulted in a better understanding of this system, with a fairly accurate location of some of its boundary lines. A eutectic point was located at 2% ZrO₂, 10% TiO₂, and 88% SiO₂ at approximately 1500°C.     

Properties of (Y)ZrO2–Al2O3 and (Y)ZrO2–Al2O3–(Ti or Si)C Composites

The effect of Al₂O₃ and (Ti or Si)C additions on various properties of a (Y)TZP (yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal)–Al₂O₃–(Ti or Si)C ternary composite ceramic were investigated for developing a zirconia-based ceramic stronger than SiC at high temperatures. Adding Al₂O₃ to (Y)TZP improved transverse rupture strength and hardness but decreased fracture toughness. This binary composite ceramic revealed a rapid loss of strength with increasing temperature. Adding TiC to the binary ceramic suppressed the decrease in strength at temperatures above 1573 K. The residual tensile stress induced by the differential thermal expansion between ZrO₂ and TiC therefore must have inhibited the t - → m -ZrO₂ martensitic transformation. It was concluded that a continuous skeleton of TiC prevented grain-boundary sliding between ZrO₂ and Al₂O₃. In contrast, for the ternary material containing β-SiC in place of TiC, the strength decreased substantially with increasing temperature because of incomplete formation of the SiC skeleton.     

Properties of a Pressureless-Sintered ZrB2–MoSi2 Ceramic Composite

A ZrB₂-based composite was fully densified by pressureless sintering at 1850°C with addition of 20 vol% MoSi₂. The microstructure was very fine, with mean dimensions of ZrB₂ grains around 2.5 μm. The four-point flexural strength in air was in excess of 500 MPa up to 1500°C.     

Reactive Hot Pressing of ZrB2–SiC Composites

A ZrB₂–SiC composite was prepared from a mixture of zirconium, silicon, and B₄C via reactive hot pressing. The three-point bending strength was 506 ± 43 MPa, and the fracture toughness was 4.0 MPa·m^1/2. The microstructure of the composite was observed via scanning electron microscopy; the in-situ -formed ZrB₂ and SiC were found in agglomerates with a size that was in the particle-size ranges of the zirconium and silicon starting powders, respectively. A model of the microstructure formation mechanism of the composite was proposed, to explain the features of the phase distributions. It is considered that, in the reactive hot-pressing process, the B and C atoms in B₄C will diffuse into the Zr and Si sites and form ZrB₂ and SiC in situ , respectively. Because the diffusion of Zr and Si atoms is slow, the microstructure (phase distributions) of the obtained composite shows the features of the zirconium and silicon starting powders.     

Pressureless Sintering of High-Density ZrB2–SiC Ceramic Composites

Ultra-high-temperature ceramic composites of ZrB₂ 20 wt%SiC were pressureless sintered under an argon atmosphere. The starting ZrB₂ powder was synthesized via the sol–gel method with a small crystallite size and a large specific surface area. Dry-pressed compacts using 4 wt% Mo as a sintering aid can be pressureless sintered to ∼97.7% theoretical density at 2250°C for 2 h. Vickers hardness and fracture toughness of the sintered ceramic composites were 14.82±0.25 GPa and 5.39±0.13 MPa·m^1/2, respectively. In addition to the good sinterability of the ZrB₂ powders, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy results showed that Mo formed a solid solution with ZrB₂, which was believed to be beneficial for the densification process.     

Stabilization of Tetragonal ZrO2 in ZrO2–SiO2 Binary Oxides

Gel-glasses of various compositions in the x ZrO₂^.(10 – x )SiO₂system were fabricated by the sol–gel process. Precipitation due to the different reactivities between tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and zirconium(IV) n -propoxide has been eliminated through the use of 2-methoxyethanol as a chelating agent. Thermal treatment of these gels produced crystalline ZrO₂particles. While monoclinic is the stable crystalline phase of zirconia at low temperatures, the metastable tetragonal phase is usually the first crystalline phase formed on heat treatment. However, stability of the tetragonal phase is low, and it transforms to the monoclinic phase on further heat treatment. In this study, it has been found that the transformation temperature increases as the SiO₂content in the ZrO₂–SiO₂ binary oxide increases. The most significant results were from samples containing only 2 mol% SiO₂, where the metastable tetragonal phase formed at low temperatures and remained stable over a broad temperature range. X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were used to elucidate the structure of these binary oxides as a function of temperature.     

Low-Fire Processing of ZrO2–SnO2–TiO2 Ceramics

Effects of a liquid-phase-sintering aid, BaCuO₂+ CuO (BCC), on densification and microwave dielectric properties of (Zr_0.8Sn_0.2)TiO₄ (ZST) ceramics have been investigated. The densification kinetics of ZST are greatly enhanced with the presence of 2.5–5 wt% BCC, but become retarded when the amount of BCC increases further. At a given BCC content, moreover, slower densification kinetics are observed with a larger particle size of ZST. The above results are attributed to a chemical reaction taking place at the interface of BCC/ZST during firing. The ZST dissolves into BCC, forming crystalline phases of ZrO₂, SnO₂, CuO, and BaTi₈O₁₆ which reduce the amount of BCC flux available for liquid-phase sintering. The crystallization kinetics become more significant, compared with densification kinetics, with increasing the amount of BCC and the particle sizes of ZST. For samples with 2.5–5 wt% BCC, a high relative sintered density is obtained at 1000°C and the resulting microwave ceramics have a dielectric constant and a value of Q at 7 GHz in the ranges of 35–38 and 2800–5000, respectively.     

Fabrication and Characterization of ZrB2-Based Ceramic Using Synthesized ZrB2–LaB6 Powder

ZrB₂–LaB₆ powder was obtained by reactive synthesis using ZrO₂, La₂O₃, B₄C, and carbon powders. Then ZrB₂–20 vol% SiC–10 vol% LaB₆ (ZSL) ceramics were prepared from commercially available SiC and the synthesized ZrB₂–LaB₆ powder via hot pressing at 2000°C. The phase composition, microstructure, and mechanical properties were characterized. Results showed that both LaB₆ and SiC were uniformly distributed in the ZrB₂ matrix. The hardness and bending strength of ZSL were 17.06±0.52 GPa and 505.8±17.9 MPa, respectively. Fracture toughness was 5.7±0.39 MPa·m^1/2, which is significantly higher than that reported for ZrB₂–20 vol% SiC ceramics, due to enhanced crack deflection and crack bridging near SiC particles.     

Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Ca2SiO4–CaZrO3 Composites

Three types of dicalcium silicate (Ca₂SiO₄–calcium zirconate (CaZrO₃) composites were fabricated and their microstructures correlated with their mechanical properties. In the first type, Ca₂SiO₄ was added as a minor phase. The second type consisted of a 50 vol% Ca₂SiO₄-50 vol% CaZrO₃ mixture, while in the third type, CaZrO₃ constituted the minor phase. Pure CaZrO₃ was also studied as a control and found to have a toughness which depended on its grain size. In composites with Ca₂SiO₄ as the minor phase, a toughness increase was observed and found to be a function of matrix grain size. The composite with the second type of microstructure had the highest toughness of about 4.0 Mpa. m^1/2, which was about double that of the monolithic CaZrO₃. No evidence was found for transformation toughening by the orthorhombic (β) to monoclinic (γ) transformation in Ca₂SiO₄. The main toughening mechanisms identified were crack deflection and crack branching. Microstructural observations indicated the existence of weak grain boundaries in CaZrO₃ agglomerates as well as weak interfaces between the two phases.     

Immiscibility Area in the System TiO2–ZrO2–SiO2

A furnace for use in conjunction with the X-ray spectrometer was developed which was capable of heating small powdered specimens in air to temperatures as high as 1850°C. This furnace was also used for the heating and quenching of specimens in air from temperatures as high as 1850°C. An area of two liquids coexisting between 20 and 93 weight % TiO₂ above 1765°± 10°C. was found to exist in the system TiO₂–SiO₂, which is in substantial agreement with the previous work of other investigators. The area of immiscibility in the system TiO₂–SiO₂ was found to extend well into the system TiO₂–ZrO₂–SiO₂. The two liquids were found to coexist over a major portion of the TiO₂ (rutile) primary-phase area with TiO₂ (rutile) being the primary crystal beneath both liquids. The temperature of two-liquid formation in the ternary was found to fall about 80°C. with the first additions of ZrO₂ up to 3%. With larger amounts of ZrO₂ the change in the temperature of the boundary of the two-liquid area was so slight as to be within the limits of error of the temperature measurement. Primary-phase fields for TiO₂ (rutile), tetragonal ZrO₂, and ZrTiO₄ were found to exist in the system TiO₂–ZrO₂–SiO₂. SiO₂ as high cristobalite is known to exist in the system TiO₂–ZrO₂–SiO₂.     

Phase Stability and Physical Properties of Cubic and Tetragonal ZrO2 in the System ZrO2–Y2O3–Ta2O5

The cubic ( c -ZrO₂) and tetragonal zirconia ( t -ZrO₂) phase stability regions in the system ZrO₂–Y₂O₃–Ta₂O₅ were delineated. The c -ZrO₂ solid solutions are formed with the fluorite structure. The t -ZrO₂ solid solutions having a c/a axial ratio (tetragonality) smaller than 1.0203 display high fracture toughness (5 to 14 MPa · m^1/2), and their instability/transformability to monoclinic zirconia ( m -ZrO₂) increases with increasing tetragonality. On the other hand, the t -ZrO₂ solid solutions stabilized at room temperature with tetragonality greater than 1.0203 have low toughness values (2 to 5 MPa · m^1/2), and their transformability is not related to the tetragonality.     

Chemical Interactions Promoting the ZrO2 Tetragonal Stabilization in ZrO2–SiO2 Binary Oxides

Metastable tetragonal ZrO₂ phase has been observed in ZrO₂–SiO₂ binary oxides prepared by the sol–gel method. There are many studies concerning the causes of ZrO₂ tetragonal stabilization in binary oxides such as Y₃O₂–ZrO₂, MgO–ZrO₂, or CaO–ZrO₂. In these binary oxides, oxygen vacancies cause changes or defects in the ZrO₂ lattice parameters, which are responsible for tetragonal stabilization. Since oxygen vacancies are not expected in ZrO₂–SiO₂ binary oxides, tetragonal stabilization should just be due to the difficulty of zirconia particles growing in the silica matrix. Furthermore, changes in the tetragonal ZrO₂ crystalline lattice parameters of these binary oxides have recently been reported in a previous paper. The changes of the zirconia crystalline lattice parameters must result from the chemical interactions at the silica–zirconia interface (e.g., formation of Si–O–Zr bonds or Si–O⁻ groups). In this paper, FT-IR and ²⁹Si NMR spectroscopy have been used to elucidate whether the presence of Si–O–Zr or Si–O⁻ is responsible for tetragonal phase stabilization. Moreover, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy have also been used to study the crystalline characteristics of the samples.     

Vibrational Spectra of HfO2–ZrO2 Solid Solutions

Vibrational spectra were measured and analyzed for HfO₂–ZrO₂ solid solutions. Some Raman bands in the high–wave–number region shift almost linearly with changes in ZrO₂ concentration between the pure end–members; their band locations can be used to determine ZrO₂ concentrations in annealed solid solutions. The Raman bands of pure ZrO₂ and HfO₂ can be correlated using the band shifts of the solid solutions. Induced stress causes band shifts for the solid solutions.     

Properties of ZrB2–SiC Ceramics by Pressureless Sintering

Pressureless sintering was used to densify ZrB₂–SiC ultra-high temperature ceramics. The physical, mechanical, thermal, electrical, and high temperature properties were investigated. This comprehensive set of properties was measured for ZrB₂ containing 20 vol% SiC in which B₄C and C were used as the sintering aids. The three-point flexural strength was 361±44 MPa and the elastic modulus was 374±25 GPa. The Vickers hardness and fracture toughness were 14.7±0.2 GPa and 4.0±0.5 MPa·m^1/2 respectively. Scanning electron microscopy studies of the microstructure of ZrB₂–SiC showed that SiC particles were distributed homogenously in the ZrB₂ matrix with little residual porosity.     

Phase Equilibrium in the System PbO-TiO2–ZrO2

Phase equilibrium relations in the system PbO–TiO₂–ZrO₂ were studied by quenching in the range where the PbO content is 50 mole % and more. Isotherms were examined at 1100°, 1200°, and 1300°C and tie lines were determined between the liquid and solid solution in equilibrium. The incongruent melting point of PbZrO₃ was 1570°C and the equilibrium between liquid, PbO-type solid, and PbZrO₃ is peritectic. Pb(Zr,Ti)O₃ solid solutions containing more than 14 mole % PbZrO₃ decomposed to liquid, ZrO₂, and Pb(Zr,Ti)O₃ and the decomposition temperature rises from 1340° to 1570°C with increasing PbZrO₃ content. The system PbTiO₃–PbZrO₃ should not be treated as a binary, but as a section of the ternary system.