Unilateral asymptomatic carotid disease does not require surgery

If a stimulus (e.g. tone or light) is repeatedly pre-exposed without consequences, it subsequently shows retarded conditioning when paired with a reinforcer (e.g. footshock) compared with a non-pre-exposed stimulus. This is latent inhibition (LI). Haloperidol-treated animals show potentiated LI, and it has been suggested that this is due to retarded switching to respond according to the stimulus-reinforcer contingency. Recently, it has been argued that the slowed control of behaviour by the stimulus-reinforcement contingency is due to a haloperidol-induced decrease in the impact, or salience, of the reinforcer, and thus should be antagonized by increasing the impact of reinforcement. Two experiments tested this prediction. In both, LI was assessed using an off-baseline conditioned emotional response procedure in rats licking for water. In Experiment 1, rats were given 10 light pre-exposures and conditioned with two footshocks of either a low (0.5 mA) or a high (1 mA) intensity. In Experiment 2, rats were given 30 pre-exposures and conditioned with either two or five footshocks of 1 mA. In Experiment 1, no-drug controls did not show LI at both shock intensities. Haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) was ineffective in potentiating LI at low-intensity shock, but produced LI when shock level was increased. In Experiment 2, no-drug controls showed LI with two but not five conditioning trials. Haloperidol was ineffective in potentiating LI with two conditioning trials, but produced LI with five conditioning trials. Although the effect of haloperidol on LI could thus be modified by manipulating shock intensity or the number of conditioning trials, the direction of such modification indicates that the potentiating effect of haloperidol on LI is not in general antagonized by increasing the impact of reinforcement.     

Cigarette smoking predicts development of depressive symptoms among U.S. adolescents

Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its nonreinforced preexposure. LI is impaired in acute schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Neuroleptic drugs enhance LI, and this effect is selective and specific for this class of drugs. The present experiments tested the proposition that neuroleptic-induced enhancement of LI stems from decreased capacity of stimulus-preexposed animals to switch responding according to the new stimulus-reinforcement contingency in the conditioning stage. LI was assessed using an off-baseline conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: preexposure to the-to-be conditioned stimulus, tone; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with a foot-shock; and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' degree of suppression of licking during tone presentation. Whereas in previous studies that demonstrated LI enhancement by neuroleptics, preexposure consisted of 10 to 40 tones, and conditioning included two tone-shock pairings, the present experiments used 40 tone preexposures, followed by an extended conditioning stage with five tone-shock pairings. It was expected that under these conditions no LI effect would be evident in untreated animals, but that animals treated with a neuroleptic drug, either during the entire LI procedure or only in conditioning, would show LI. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that LI was obtained in rats treated with haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg in experiment 1, 0.03 and 0.2 mg/kg in experiment 2) but not in the untreated controls. Experiment 3 showed that the same outcome was obtained when haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) administration was confined to the conditioning stage. Experiment 4 showed that clozapine (5 mg/kg)-treated animals showed LI when the drug was confined to conditioning, but not to the preexposure stage. The implications of these results for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs are discussed.     

Latent inhibition and overshadowing in conditioned emotional response conditioning with rats.

Tested whether unreinforced preexposure to one element of a compound CS would prevent that element from overshadowing the other element, using 64 male hooded COBS rats. Groups of Ss were given 20 preexposure trials to a light prior to conditioned emotional response (CER) conditioning or were given no pre-exposure. In CER conditioning, Ss received either a noise plus light or a noise followed by shock. In Ss given no pre-exposure, the presence of the light significantly attenuated conditioned suppression to the noise CS. However, in the pre-exposed compound-cue group no reduction in suppression to the noise CS was observed after 4 CER trials. After 8 CER trials, suppression to the noise CS was significantly attenuated. Latent inhibition temporarily reduced the extent to which the light CS overshadowed the noise CS. Overshadowing of the noise in the pre-exposed compound-cue group after 8 CER trials was not accompanied by any increase in suppression to the light CS. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Increased extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of the rat during associative learning of neutral stimuli

Brain microdialysis was used to study changes in dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and the dorsal striatum during associative learning between two neutral stimuli, flashing light and tone, presented on a paired schedule during stage 1 of a sensory preconditioning paradigm. The tone was subsequently paired with mild footshock using standard aversive conditioning procedures and the formation of a conditioned association between the flashing light and the tone in stage 1 was assessed by measuring the ability of the flashing light to elicit the same conditioned response as the tone when presented at test. The first experiment used behavioural monitoring only, to establish stimulus parameters for subsequent microdialysis experiments. Animals receiving paired presentation of the light and tone in stage 1 showed a conditioned suppression of licking to the light as well as to the tone, indicating that associative learning between the flashing light and the tone had occurred during stage 1, whilst in a separate group of animals given the same stimuli over the same time period but on an explicitly non-paired schedule, the conditioned emotional response was seen to the tone, but not to the light, showing that no association had been formed between the two stimuli during stage 1. In dialysis experiments using the same procedure, we measured a two-fold rise in dopamine in the nucleus accumbens during paired presentation of flashing light and tone, but not during non-paired presentation of the two stimuli. On subsequent test presentation of the two stimuli, we saw increases in accumbal dopamine on presentation of the tone in both groups, reflecting the formation of an association with the footshock in both. However the flashing light elicited an increase in dopamine only in the group which had received paired presentation at stage 1. Thus accumbal dopamine release at test is correlated to the ability of the stimulus to evoke a conditioned response measured behaviourally. Hypotheses of the behavioural function of the mesolimbic dopamine system centre on its role in mediating the effects of biological reinforcers, both rewarding and aversive, conditioned and unconditioned. The present results, showing increases in extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens when an association is formed between two stimuli of which neither is a biological reinforcer nor, prior to formation of the association, affects dopamine levels, suggest a role for accumbal dopamine in the modulation of associative learning in general, not only that involving reinforcement.     

Role of primary motivation in stimulus preexposure effects.

It is currently a matter of debate whether the deficit in conditioning observed after stimulus preexposure is one of acquisition or one of performance. The major criticism of performance-based theories is their inability to specify what is learned during nonreinforced preexposure that may influence subsequent acquisition of conditioned responding. Experiments 1 and 2 used an excitatory appetitive conditioning procedure and Experiment 3 used an inhibitory appetitive conditioning procedure, with rats as subjects, and consistently found that the effects of preexposure to a stimulus transferred to conditioning only when the reinforcer was relevant to the motivational state in which that preexposure was conducted. This finding suggests that during preexposure, rats learn that a stimulus is unrelated to events of relevance to their current motivational state. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Modulation of the Effective Salience of a Stimulus by Direct and Associative Activation of Its Representation.

In 2 experiments, rats received exposure to presentations of a footshock preceded by a given cue. In the PRf (partial reinforcement) condition, this cue also occurred in the absence of the shock; in the CRf (continuous reinforcement) condition, it did not. Subsequent testing in which a new stimulus was used to signal the shock (Experiment 1) showed that the shock was more effective as a reinforcer for the PRf than for the CRf group. In Experiment 2, the shock was used as a conditioned stimulus signaling food delivery, and it was found that conditioning occurred more readily in the PRf than in the CRf group. These results accord with the hypothesis that preexposure to the shock results in a decline in its effective salience but that experience of a cue that signals shock in the absence of the shock itself attenuates this effect and helps maintain stimulus salience. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

An immediate-shock freezing deficit with discrete cues: A possible role for unconditioned stimulus processing mechanisms.

Five experiments with C57BL/6 mice (Mus musculus) investigated whether failures in shock processing might contribute to deficits in freezing that occur after an animal receives a shock immediately on exposure to a conditioning context. Experiment 1 found that more contextual freezing resulted from delayed shocks than from immediate shocks across 4 shock intensities. Experiment 2 extended the immediate-shock freezing deficit to discrete stimuli. Experiment 3 found that preexposure to the to-be-conditioned cue did not facilitate immediate cued conditioning. Experiment 4 found that context preexposure enhanced context-evoked fear after an immediate shock. Experiment 5 found that context preexposure also enhanced immediate cued conditioning. These findings are problematic for current theories of the immediate-shock freezing deficit that focus exclusively on processing of the conditioned stimulus, and they suggest that failures in shock processing may contribute to the deficit. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Stimulus competition between a discrete cue and a training context: Cue competition does not result from the division of a limited resource.

Several associative learning theories explain cue competition as resulting from the division of a limited resource among competing cues. This leads to an assumption that behavioral control by 2 cues competing with each other should always reflect a tradeoff, resulting in apparent conservation of total reinforcer value across all competing cues. This assumption was tested in 3 conditioned lick suppression experiments with rats, investigating the effects of changing the conditioned stimulus (CS) duration (Experiment 1), administering pretraining exposures to the CS (Experiment 2), and presenting nonreinforced CSs during the intertrial interval (Experiment 3) on Pavlovian conditioned responding to both the CS and the conditioning context. Fear conditioned to the context and to the CS decreased when the CS was of longer duration, massively preexposed before being paired with the reinforcer, or presented alone during the intertrial interval. These observations are problematic for the theories that explain cue competition as the division of a limited resource and suggest that the total reinforcer value across competing cues is not always fixed for a given reinforcer. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition, and habituation: Associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues.

Rats were used as subjects in four experiments to investigate the transfer of learning from one context to another. Subjects received two sessions of training each day, one in each of two different contexts. Experiment 1 showed that the habituation of the unconditioned response to a stimulus presented in one context was left intact when the stimulus was presented in another context, but that latent inhibition was attenuated when preexposure and conditioning phases occurred in different contexts. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated that a conditioned response made on the basis of an appetitive reinforcer was diminished when conditioning and testing occurred in different contexts, but that aversive conditioning was not influenced by the context in which testing occurred. In Experiment 4, the presence of an aversive reinforcer during training did not preclude the occurrence of context-specific conditioning on the basis of an appetitive reinforcer. Associative and retrieval-based interpretations of the results are explored. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Role of stimulus ambiguity in conditional learning.

Three experiments using rats and the conditioned emotional response procedure examined the notion that when a conditioned stimulus (CS) is paired with a reinforcer (US), that CS must be ambiguous if the CS–US association is to become the target of conditional control. CS ambiguity was manipulated by varying whether the CS had been preexposed prior to conditioning. In Experiments 1 and 2, it was demonstrated that a cue that accompanied pairings of a CS and shock acquired conditional control over the CS–shock association when that CS had been preexposed, but not when it was novel. The measure of conditional control in Experiments 1 and 2 was the ability of the (conditional) cue to enhance responding to the target CS. Experiment 3 used a blocking procedure to show that this enhancement reflected an amplification of the target CS's effective associative strength. These findings extend existing knowledge of the conditions required for conditional cue formation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Assessments of Changes in the Effective Salience of Stimulus Elements as a Result of Stimulus Preexposure.

Rats received exposure to 3 flavor compounds, AX and BX, presented in alternation, and CX, presented on a separate block of trials. The hypothesis that this treatment would leave B effectively more salient than C was tested in 3 ways. Experiment 1 showed that the unconditioned response evoked by B was stronger than that evoked by C. Experiment 2 showed that B was more effective than C when used as a reinforcer in a sensory preconditioning procedure. Experiment 3 showed that B was learned about more readily than C as a conditioned stimulus in flavor aversion conditioning. Alternating preexposure to 2 similar stimuli may protect their distinctive features from the loss of salience normally produced by nonreinforced exposure to a stimulus. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of ethanol on encoding, consolidation, and expression of extinction following contextual fear conditioning.

Studies of contextual fear conditioning have found that ethanol administered prior to a conditioning session impairs the conditioned freezing response during a test session the next day. The present experiments examined the effects of ethanol on extinction, the loss of conditioned responding that occurs as the animal learns that a previously conditioned context no longer signals shock. Ethanol (1.5 g/kg) administered prior to single (Experiment 1) or multiple (Experiment 2) extinction sessions impaired extinction. Ethanol administered prior to a test session disrupted the expression of freezing after extinction (Experiments 3-5). There was some evidence that ethanol served as an internal stimulus signaling the operation of conditioning or extinction contingencies (Experiments 4-5). In Experiment 6, postsession injections of 1.5 g/kg ethanol had no effect on extinction with brief (3 min) or long (24 min) exposures to the context, but injections of 3 g/kg after long exposures impaired extinction. Together, these results indicate that ethanol affects extinction by acting on multiple learning and performance processes, including attention, memory encoding, and memory expression. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Motor cortex lesions do not affect learning or performance of the eyeblink response in rabbits.

The possible modulatory role of motor cortex in classical conditioning of the eyeblink response was examined by ablating anterior neocortex in rabbits and training them with an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) and an airpuff unconditioned stimulus (US) in either a delay (Experiment 1) or a trace (Experiment 2) conditioning paradigm. Topographic measures such as amplitude and onset latency were assessed during conditioning sessions for conditioned responses (CRs) and on separate test days for unconditioned responses (URs) by using a range of US intensities. No lesion effects were observed for learning or performance measures in acquisition or retention of either delay or trace conditioning. During trace conditioning, lesioned rabbits did, however, exhibit a trend toward impairment and demonstrated significantly longer CR latencies. Damage to motor and frontal cortex does not significantly affect eyeblink response performance or learning in either a delay or a trace conditioning paradigm. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Extending conditioned stimuli before versus after unconditioned stimuli: Implications for real-time models of conditioning.

In four experiments using the conditioned suppression procedure with rats, we compared the effects of extending conditioned stimuli (CSs) before versus after reinforcement (called B vs. A extensions). In Experiments 1 and 2, Group 0 (no extension) received 2-min noise CS trials (3 per day in Experiment 1, 1 per day in Experiment 2) that terminated with a 1-s grid shock unconditioned stimulus (US). For Group B, the CS began 12 min before the US; for Group A, the CS began 2 min before the US but persisted for 10 min past US termination. In Experiments 3 and 4, similar trials (3 per day in Experiment 3, 1 per day in Experiment 4) included a 2-min light CS that always terminated with the US; thus the noise CS became a systematically manipulated context cue in which light-shock pairings were embedded. In Experiments 1 and 2 we found asymmetrical effects of CS extensions: B extensions weakened conditioning more than did A extensions. In Experiments 3 and 4 we found symmetrical effects: A and B extensions weakened context conditioning equally. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Novel factors contributing to the expression of latent inhibition.

Behavioral and neural correlates of latent inhibition (LI) during eyeblink conditioning were studied in 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) were conditioned after 8 days of tone conditioned stimulus (CS) presentations or 8 days of context-alone experience. LI was seen in the CS-preexposed rabbits when a relatively intense (5 psi) airpuff unconditioned stimulus was paired with the CS. In Experiment 2, rabbits were given 0, 4, or 8 days of CS preexposures or context-alone experience. Hippocampal activity was monitored from the 8-day CS- or context-exposure rabbits. The LI effect was seen only in rabbits given 4 days of CS preexposure, thus suggesting that LI depended largely on the rate of acquisition in the context-preexposed control group. The neural recordings showed that the hippocampus was sensitive to the relative novelty of the stimuli and the overall context, regardless of whether exposure to stimuli and context promoted LI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Blocked and overshadowed stimuli are weakened in their ability to serve as blockers and second-order reinforcers in Pavlovian fear conditioning

The ability of a blocked or overshadowed conditioned stimulus (CS) to serve as (a) blocker or (b) a 2nd-order reinforcer in Pavlovian fear conditioning was tested in 152 albino rats. CS-evoked suppression of barpressing for food was the index of conditioned fear. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that an overshadowed CS was weakened in its ability to serve as a blocker. In Experiment 2, a blocked CS was similarly weakened. Experiment 3 showed that an overshadowed and blocked CS was weakened in its ability to serve as a 2nd-order reinforcer. Experiments 4 and 5 failed to restore the blocking ability of blocked (Experiment 4) or overshadowed (Experiment 5) CSs by extinguishing the CSs that had blocked or overshadowed them. Results favor a learning-deficit view of blocking and overshadowing.     

Morphine attenuation of conditioned autoanalgesia: Implications for theories of situation-specific tolerance to morphine analgesia.

The effect of morphine administration on the development of conditioned autoanalgesia was investigated in four experiments. Animals were administered either morphine or saline and then either exposed or not exposed to nociceptive stimulation. In Experiments 1, 2, and 4 the nociceptive stimulus to which animals were exposed was electric footshock, and in Experiment 3 it was thermal stimulation produced by exposure to a hot plate. It was found that morphine administration attenuated the development of conditioned autoanalgesia produced by exposure to 1 mA shock for 45 s when tests for conditioned autoanalgesia were conducted when animals were under the influence of saline or morphine (Experiments 1 and 2). Morphine also attenuated the conditioned autoanalgesia arising from exposure to 1 mA shock for 15 s, but only when the conditions for the development and expression of conditioned autoanalgesia were made optimal (Experiment 4). Morphine failed to block conditioning when animals were exposed to 2.5 mA shock for 180 s (Experiment 1). Morphine also attenuated conditioned autoanalgesia when animals were exposed to thermal stimulation (Experiment 3), with the degree of attenuation increasing as a function of the intensity of the nociceptive stimulus. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for theories of situation-specific tolerance to the analgesic effect of morphine. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Stimulus intensity in sensory preconditioning of rats.

Examined the sensory preconditioning (SPC) analogs to UCS and CS intensity in 2 experiments with male hooded rats (N= 144). In Exp. I, Ss received S1-S2 (light and tone, counterbalanced) pairings with 1 of 3 different intensities of S2, followed by conditioned emotional response (CER) training to S2. Suppression of drinking by S1 (SPC groups) and S2 (CER groups) was tested. Amount of SPC was not significantly affected by S2 intensity, but the strength of the CER was an increasing function of S2 (CS) intensity. In Exp. II, amount of SPC was a monotonically increasing function of S1 intensity. Results are interpreted in terms of the similarities and differences between SPC and classical conditioning. (French summary) (16 ref.) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Context conditional flavor preferences in the rat based on fructose and maltodextrin reinforcers.

In three experiments, rats were exposed to a flavor preference procedure in which flavor A was paired with the reinforcer and flavor B presented alone in Context 1, while in Context 2 flavor A was presented alone and flavor B with the reinforcer. With fructose as the reinforcer both two- and one-bottle training procedures produced a context-dependent preference (Experiments 1 and 2). With maltodextrin as the reinforcer two-bottle training produced a context-dependent preference (Experiment 1). Following one-bottle training with maltodextrin reinforcement rats demonstrated a context-dependent preference when the conditioned stimulus (CS)- was presented with a dilute solution of the reinforcer during training (Experiment 3B) but not when the CS- was presented alone (Experiments 2 and 3A). The pattern of results with maltodextrin reinforcement suggests that there was competition between the cue flavors and the taste of the maltodextrin as predictors of the postingestive consequences of the maltodextrin reinforcer. The fact that rats were able to display context-dependent flavor preferences is consistent with the idea that learned flavor preferences rely on the sort of cue-consequence associations that underpin other forms of conditioning which produce accurate performance on biconditional tasks. The differences between fructose- and maltodextrin-based preferences are discussed in terms of configural and elemental learning processes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)