Comparative effect of lansoprazole/amoxicillin with omeprazole/amoxicillin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer

Lansoprazole, a potent antisecretory drug, possesses on an equimolar basis a 4-fold higher in vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity than omeprazole. In a prospective randomized study we compared lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. with omeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for 14 days followed by lansoprazole 30 mg q.d. or omeprazole 20 mg q.d. for 14 additional days in 50 H. pylori positive duodenal ulcer patients (14f, 36m, age 27-83 [mean 43] years). H. pylori infection was diagnosed by histology (3 antral biopsies and 2 from gastric body, H & E- and Giemsa stain), rapid urease test (CLO) and culture in 39 patients, or by histology and rapid urease test in 11 patients. Control endoscopy was performed 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment. For eradication, a negative result in all 3 diagnostic modalities was required. The eradication rate was 43% (9/21 patients) in both treatment groups. 8 patients were lost to follow-up. The ulcer healing rate was 100% in both groups. Nonsmokers had a significantly higher (p = 0.026) eradication rate than smokers. No relevant adverse effects of the therapy occurred. 24 patients with persistent H. pylori infection were subsequently treated with lansoprazole 60 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for 14 days. Eradication was achieved in 5/22 (23%) patients (3/14 smokers, 2/8 nonsmokers), while 2 patients were lost to follow-up. 17 patients with persistent H. pylori infection after the second treatment received quadruple therapy consisting of metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d., tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. bismuth-subcitrate 120 mg q.i.d. and lansoprazole 30 mg for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 12/15 patients (80%). In conclusion, lansoprazole plus amoxicillin was equal to omeprazole plus amoxicillin in the treatment of H. pylori infected duodenal ulcer patients. Patients with eradication failure after dual therapy were successfully treated by quadruple therapy. In contrast, high dose lansoprazole and amoxicillin therapy was effective in only 23% of patients with persistent infection after standard dual therapy.     

"Eight drugs in one day" chemotherapy in a nonfamilial bilateral retinoblastoma with recurrent cerebrospinal fluid metastases

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the addition of bismuth subnitrate to a dual oral therapy regimen with omeprazole plus amoxycillin could improve Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: Fifty consecutive Helicobacter pylori-positive patients were randomly enrolled to receive either (A) bismuth subnitrate (300 mg q.d.s.), omeprazole (20 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (500 mg q.d.s.), or (B) omeprazole (20 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (500 mg q.d.s.). Both groups (n=25 each) received the medication for 14 days. H. pylori status was reassessed 30 days after completion of the therapy in order to evaluate eradication rates. RESULTS: Six patients were lost to follow-up and therefore excluded from the study (three patients from each group). One patient from Group B withdrew from the study because of side-effects. The addition of bismuth subnitrate to omeprazole and amoxycillin significantly improved its efficacy in eradicating H. pylori, with 72% (18/25) eradication in Group A and 52% (13/25) in Group B (P=0.027). The addition of bismuth subnitrate to dual oral therapy was also capable of improving the healing of peptic ulcers when compared with dual oral therapy alone (100%, 8/8 vs. 58%, 4/7; P=0.021). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the addition of bismuth subnitrate to dual oral therapy enhances H. pylori eradication, and improves healing of peptic ulcers.     

Factors influencing Helicobacter pylori eradication with 2 week combination therapy of lansoprazole and amoxycillin: intragastric distribution of colonization and gastric mucosal atrophy

In Japan, gastric ulcers are often accompanied by marked gastric mucosal atrophy. We evaluated the dual therapy of double-dose lansoprazole and amoxycillin for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Japanese ulcer patients and investigated the effects of intragastric distribution of H. pylori colonization and gastric mucosal atrophy on eradication with this combination therapy. Seventy-six H. pylori-positive ulcer patients received lansoprazole (30 mg) plus amoxycillin (500 mg) twice daily for 2 weeks (LA-60 group), lansoprazole (30 mg once daily) plus amoxycillin (500 mg twice daily) for 2 weeks (LA-30 group) or lansoprazole (30 mg once daily) for 6 or 8 weeks (LPZ group). Infection was evaluated by light microscopy, culture and biopsy urease tests. Helicobacter pylori colonization was classified as localized to the corpus (localized type) or involving the antrum and corpus (whole type). Fundic mucosal atrophy was graded according to endoscopic and histological features. Eradication was achieved in 67.6% in the LA-60 group, 31.6% in the LA-30 group, and 0% in the LPZ group, and moderate or severe histological gastritis was improved in the LA-60 group. Eradication was better in localized-type colonization (92%) than whole-type (56%), and better with fundic mucosal atrophy (84%) than without, but poor in both whole-type colonization and scanty mucosal atrophy (47%). The LA-60 therapy achieves better eradication in Japanese ulcer patients with localized H. pylori colonization and/or gastric mucosal atrophy, which are likely to be important predictors for the successful eradication with dual therapy.     

High-dose proton pump inhibitor plus amoxycillin for the treatment or retreatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: The combination of 120 mg of omeprazole (40 mg t.d.s.) and amoxycillin has been reported to be effective for treating H. pylori infections. METHODS: Normal volunteers with H. pylori infection received high-dose omeprazole (40 mg t.d.s.) or lansoprazole (60 mg t.d.s.) plus amoxycillin 750 mg t.d.s. for 14 days. The studies were open label and not randomized as those receiving omeprazole plus amoxycillin had previously failed lower dose omeprazole (20 mg b.d.) plus amoxycillin therapy more than 6 months previously. Those receiving lansoprazole plus amoxycillin had not been previously treated. Four to 6 weeks after ending antimicrobial therapy, H. pylori status was determined by Genta stain of gastric mucosal biopsies. RESULTS: Forty-three volunteers entered the study and 41 completed it. The overall success with high-dose proton pump inhibitor plus amoxycillin was 34.9%. For the individual regimens the per-protocol results were 48% (95% CI = 28-69%) with lansoprazole and 12.5% (95% CI = 2-38%) with omeprazole. Compliance was > 95% for both regimens. Side-effects were experienced by four lansoprazole and three omeprazole subjects, and caused two omeprazole subjects to withdraw. Cure rates were similar among different races and ethnic groups, between men and women, and between smokers and non-smokers. The level of the pre-treatment urea breath test also did not predict outcome. CONCLUSION: High-dose proton pump inhibitor plus amoxycillin combinations for treatment of H. pylori infection yielded unacceptable results, as the 95% confidence intervals did not include an 80% cure rate. These combinations do not yield consistent results worldwide and cannot be recommended as primary therapy.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication and ulcer healing with daily lansoprazole, plus 1 or 2 weeks co-therapy with amoxycillin and clarithromycin

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor based combination therapy is one standard strategy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIM: To compare the eradication and duodenal ulcer healing efficacy of two 2-week, single dose, lansoprazole based combination therapies. METHODS: Healthy adult patients with endoscopically confirmed, H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease (3 mm > ulcer < 20 mm) were eligible for the study. All patients received a 14 day course of lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., and were randomized to receive either 7 or 14 days of amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. Patients were endoscoped at entry and 14-17 days later. Symptomatic, unhealed patients received a further 14 days of therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg o.m. Eradication was confirmed a minimum of 28 days after cessation of all therapy by urease reaction and histological assessment of gastric body and antral biopsies (three biopsies each site). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized to a treatment arm, of which 58 could be included in an intention-to-treat and key-point-available analysis. H. pylori eradication rates were identical, at 93% (95% CI: 73-98% (1 week), 78-99% (2 week)). In the combined group, all but 13 ulcers were healed at 2 weeks; six required further therapy because of symptoms, while six of the seven asymptomatic patients went on to heal. CONCLUSION: An eradication regimen, based on a 2-week course of single dose lansoprazole with 1 week of antibiotic co-therapy, is effective in eradicating H. pylori, while the 2 weeks of acid suppression is usually effective in duodenal ulcer healing.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication as a surrogate marker for the reduction of duodenal ulcer recurrence

OBJECTIVES: An abundance of data exists documenting the association of H. pylori eradication with the reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence. AIM: To evaluate the validity of using H. pylori eradication as a surrogate marker for the reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence using rigorously controlled studies. METHODS: Three controlled clinical trials were conducted in patients with uncomplicated, active duodenal ulcers. Patients were treated with various combinations of omeprazole and amoxycillin. Ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication were assessed. For patients whose duodenal ulcer healed, duodenal ulcer recurrence was determined over a 6-month period in patients with H. pylori eradication and those remaining positive for H. pylori at least 4 weeks after treatment. To support the data obtained from these clinical trials, a search of the medical literature was conducted to identify additional human clinical trials in which duodenal ulcer recurrence rates were measured and categorized by H. pylori status at least 1 month post-treatment. RESULTS: In 11 controlled trials, the overall 6-18-month duodenal ulcer recurrence rate was 54% among patients remaining positive for H. pylori at least 4 weeks after treatment compared to 6% among patients with H. pylori eradication following treatment. This finding was corroborated by the uncontrolled trials, in which the duodenal ulcer recurrence rate was 64% among patients found to be H. pylori-positive and 6% for patients found to be H. pylori-negative at least 4 weeks after treatment. A time course of duodenal ulcer recurrence rates using pooled data from both controlled and uncontrolled studies demonstrated that duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-negative patients persisted for up to 4 years following treatment. Duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-positive patients increased for the first year, then levelled off. A comparison of the duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for different treatment regimens revealed that eradication regimens based on omeprazole plus antibiotics and bismuth plus antibiotics exhibited similar duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-positive and -negative patients. CONCLUSION: Regardless of treatment regimens, H. pylori eradication produced a consistent and significant reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence. Therefore H. pylori eradication, 4 weeks post-therapy, can be used as a surrogate marker for reduced duodenal ulcer recurrence in investigational clinical trials.     

Lansoprazole. An update of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of acid-related disorders

Lansoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that reduces gastric acid secretion. It has proved effective in combination regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and as monotherapy to heal and relieve symptoms of gastric or duodenal ulcers and gastro-oesophageal reflux. After initial healing, it may be used to prevent recurrence of oesophageal erosions or peptic ulcers in patients in whom H. pylori is not the major cause of ulceration and to reduce basal acid output in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Usual dosages are 15 to 60 mg/day, although dosages of < or = 180 mg/day have been used in patients with hypersecretory states. In patients with duodenal or gastric ulcer, short term lansoprazole monotherapy was similar to omeprazole and superior to histamine H2 receptor antagonists in achieving healing rates > 90%. Lansoprazole was as effective a component of H. pylori eradication regimens as omeprazole, tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate (colloidal bismuth subcitrate) or ranitidine. Lansoprazole was superior to ranitidine in symptom relief and healing of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and tended to relieve symptoms more rapidly than omeprazole, although initial healing was similar. As maintenance treatment, lansoprazole was similar to omeprazole and superior to ranitidine in relieving symptoms and preventing relapse. Lansoprazole was also superior to ranitidine in healing and relieving symptoms of oesophageal erosions associated with Barrett's oesophagus; healing was maintained for a mean of 2.9 years in > or = 70% of patients. Lansoprazole was also superior to ranitidine in prophylaxis of redilatation of oesophageal strictures. After > or = 4 years of use in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, lansoprazole 60 to 180 mg/day effectively controlled basal acid output. Dosages may be reduced in some patients once healing and symptom relief has been achieved. Preliminary studies of lansoprazole in patients at risk of aspiration pneumonia or stress ulcers show promise. Although studies show lansoprazole is potentially effective in treating gastrointestinal bleeding, future studies should assess patients' H. pylori status. Lansoprazole has been well tolerated in clinical trials, with headache, diarrhoea, dizziness and nausea appearing to be the most common adverse effects. Tolerability of lansoprazole does not deteriorate with age and the drug is well tolerated in long term use (< or = 4 years) in patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or reflux disease. Thus, lansoprazole is an important alternative to omeprazole and H2 receptor antagonists in acid-related disorders. In addition to its efficacy in healing or maintenance treatment, it may provide more effective symptom relief than other comparator agents.     

Erosive duodenitis: prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and response to eradication therapy with omeprazole plus two antibiotics

OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with erosive duodenitis (ED), the associated gastric histological lesions and their response to eradication therapy with omeprazole plus two antibiotics. METHODS: A prospective study was made of 57 patients with ED (mean age 46 +/- 16 years, 72% males). At endoscopy, biopsies from gastric antrum and body were obtained for histological study (haematoxylin and eosin). A 13C-urea breath test was also performed. Omeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus two antibiotics (amoxycillin 1 g twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, metronidazole 500 mg twice daily) were administered for 1 week. Endoscopy and breath test were repeated 1 month after completing therapy, and the breath test was performed again at 6 months. RESULTS: All patients were H. pylori positive. Overall eradication was achieved in 86% (95% CI 75-93%). Duodenal erosion healing was obtained in 45 patients (79%). Healing was achieved in 86% (CI 73-93%) of cases with successful eradication therapy, but only in 3/8 (37%; CI 8.5-75%) patients with therapy failure (P < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, H. pylori eradication was the only variable which correlated with erosion healing (odds ratio 10; CI 2-51; P < 0.01). Histological improvement, in both the gastric antrum and body, was demonstrated when eradication was achieved (P < 0.001). Six months after diagnosis H. pylori absence was confirmed in all patients with initial therapy success (all of them asymptomatic), and infection was confirmed in the eight patients who were H. pylori positive after therapy (six of them symptomatic). At 6-month follow-up, endoscopy was normal in 6/7 H. pylori-negative patients with previously persistent ED, while erosions were still present in 4/5 H. pylori-positive patients with previously persistent ED. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence (100%) of H. pylori infection in patients with ED was observed. A 1-week twice daily therapy with omeprazole plus two antibiotics (clarithromycin plus amoxycillin or metronidazole) was very effective in H. pylori eradication, duodenal erosion healing, symptomatic improvement, and in disappearance of associated histological gastritis. These observations suggest that ED should be considered a variant form of duodenal ulcer disease and treated accordingly; that is, with H. pylori eradication therapy.     

Low- versus high-dose azithromycin triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: We report a clinical trial which evaluated the effectiveness of triple therapy containing low- and high-dose azithromycin to treat Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: From March 1997 to March 1998, patients infected with H. pylori were assigned to receive either: Treatment 1: ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) (400 mg b.d.) and amoxycillin (1 g b.d.) for 10 days with azithromycin 500 mg o.m. for 3 days: or Treatment 2: RBC and amoxycillin for 10 days with azithromycin 1 g o.m. for 3 days. H. pylori eradication was established by a urea breath test at least 4 weeks after therapy. Side-effects and compliance were assessed using a diary. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled. Fifty-seven per cent of patients were treated for active peptic ulcer disease or a history of peptic ulcer disease. Treatment 1 cured H. pylori in 44% and 44% by per protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, respectively. The corresponding eradication rates for Treatment 2 were 79% and 75%. Two patients taking Treatment 2 dropped out of the study because of side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: With RBC and amoxycillin for 10 days, azithromycin at a dose of 1 g/day for 3 days was significantly better at curing H. pylori infection than azithromycin 500 mg/day for 3 days.     

Resurfacing of the donor defect after wrap-around toe transfer with a free lateral forearm flap

BACKGROUND: One-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies are very popular in the US despite limited US data documenting efficacy. We assessed 1-week proton pump inhibitor triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori, and compared them to dual antibiotic therapies (to assess benefit of omeprazole) and to omeprazole-amoxycillin (to assess benefit of clarithromycin) in a large, randomized, US multicentre study. METHODS: Healthy subjects who were H. pylori-positive by rapid serological test and 13C-urea breath test were randomly assigned to (i) omeprazole (O) 20 mg b.d. + amoxycillin (A) 1 g t.d.s. for 14 days (OA); (ii) A 1 g b.d. + clarithromycin (C) 500 mg b.d. for 7 days (AC); (iii) C 250 mg b.d. + metronidazole (M) 500 mg b.d. for 7 days (CM); (iv) O 20 mg b.d. + C 250 mg b.d. + M 500 mg b.d. for 7 days (MOC); or (v) O 20 mg b.d. + C 500 mg b.d. + A 1 g b.d. for 7 days (OAC). Repeat breath tests were done at 6 weeks to assess H. pylori status. RESULTS: Three hundred and two H. pylori-positive subjects at 25 centres received medication. Intention-to-treat cure rate was significantly higher for OAC (82%) than for MOC (67%), CM (59%), AC (18%) or OA (58%), Per-protocol cure rates were 85% for OAC and 75% for MOC. Discontinuation of therapy due to a side-effect occurred in 0-3% of each study group. CONCLUSIONS: One-week twice-daily triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin provides the best rate of eradication of the five regimens studied. However, treatment in the US for 7 days may be unable to achieve eradication rates of > or = 90% with proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy.     

Proposed recommendations for research on biochemical markers for problematic drinking

Successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in children has required long treatment regimens that may result in noncompliance with failure to eradicate this organism. Despite full compliance with shorter therapeutic regimens, such as amoxycillin and omeprazole for 2 wk, the H. pylori eradication rate is poor in children. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of, and compliance with, a 2-wk treatment with metronidazole, omeprazole, and clarithromycin in eradicating H. pylori disease in children. METHODS: Over a 15-month period, children diagnosed to be H. pylori positive by Steiner's stain of gastric antral biopsy specimens were treated with metronidazole, omeprazole, and clarithromycin. Follow-up upper GI endoscopy was performed 6-8 wk after completion of therapy. RESULTS: Of 15 patients with H. pylori-positive antral gastritis, 11 had duodenal ulcer disease; three patients with severe abdominal pain and one with vomiting had H. pylori gastritis only. H. pylori eradication was seen in 11 of 11 (100%) patients with duodenal ulcer disease and in three of four (75%) with gastritis only; the overall success rate was 93%. Duodenal ulcer disease healed when H. pylori was eradicated in all but one patient, who at presentation had a penetrating ulcer with a duodenobiliary fistula. Fourteen of 15 patients (93%) were fully compliant, and no adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Two weeks of therapy with metronidazole, omeprazole, and clarithromycin is effective H. pylori therapy in children. It is well tolerated, and full compliance can be achieved.     

CT in Fournier''s gangrene

BACKGROUND: Few outcome studies directly compare Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with maintenance H2-antagonist therapy in duodenal ulcer disease. AIM: To examine prospectively the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy with ranitidine maintenance therapy over 1 year in patients with confirmed chronic duodenal ulcer. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with active H. pylori infection were randomized to receive ranitidine, 150 mg/day initially (58 patients), or omeprazole, 40 mg/day, amoxycillin 2 g/day and metronidazole 1.2 g/day for 14 days, or omeprazole 40 mg/day and clarithromycin 1.5 g/day, for 14 days (if penicillin-allergic). Symptoms were assessed using the Gastrointestinal System Rating Scale (GSRS) and SF36 quality of life index. RESULTS: 13C urea breath testing confirmed overall treatment success in 100% of patients (58/58) per protocol and 95.1% (58/61) on an intention-to-treat basis. At 4 and 12 months there were no differences in any GSRS symptoms between treatment groups. SF36 analysis showed a perceived health improvement at 4 and 12 months in patients who received H. pylori eradication. However, despite successful H. pylori eradication, one-fifth of patients still required antisecretory therapy. CONCLUSION: Following successful H. pylori eradication, chronic duodenal ulcer patients were at least as well symptomatically as when taking maintenance ranitidine. They perceived that their health had improved, but a subgroup was still acid-suppression dependent.     

Midazolam improves postoperative epidural analgesia with continuous infusion of local anaesthetics

BACKGROUND: A number of triple drug regimens using proton pump inhibitors and two antibiotics have been evaluated in the West and reported to achieve Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of over 90%. In developing countries however, these combinations have neither been well evaluated, nor the optimum treatment for H. pylori infection well defined. AIM: To compare the combination of a proton pump inhibitor with a nitroimidazole and another antibiotic in eradicating H. pylori infection and healing duodenal ulcer. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with active duodenal ulcer who were positive for H. pylori (by rapid urease test and 14C-urea breath test) were randomized into three treatments groups: (1) LAS (n=21): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., amoxycillin 500 mg q.d.s. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 2 weeks; (2) LCS (n=18): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 1 week; (3) LPS (n=21): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., pefloxacin 400 mg o.m. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 2 weeks. Urease and breath tests were performed at 0, 6 and 12 weeks to check for H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat eradication rates were as follows: LAS 86%, LCS 83%, LPS 71%; the overall ulcer healing rate was 90% at 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: High H. pylori eradication rates were achieved using the amoxycillin- and clarithromycin-based therapies. Fewer side-effects, better compliance and low cost favoured the amoxycillin-based therapy.     

Requirement of heavy neurofilament subunit in the development of axons with large calibers

The aim of treatment of Helicobacter pylori is eradication of the bacterium from the foregut. Treatment is difficult because of the bacterium's habitat and acquired resistance to commonly used antibiotics. Dual therapy, the 2 week combination of omeprazole or ranitidine bismuth citrate and either amoxycillin or clarithromycin, eradicates H. pylori in 50-80% of patients. Classical triple therapy is commonly associated with side effects, is highly dependent on patient's compliance, and is significantly less effective in the presence of metronidazole-resistant strains of H. pylori, where eradication may be 50%. One week, twice daily, proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy regimens eradicate about 90% of H. pylori and are associated with mild side effects. Second line regimens include 7 days treatment with omeprazole and 3 times daily amoxycillin and metronidazole or a PPI-based quadruple therapy regimen. In some cases, the bacterium defeats all attempts at eradication.     

One-week low-dose triple therapy vs. two-week medium-dose double therapy for H.pylori infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our study is to compare a short-term low-dose triple therapy with a long-term medium-dose double therapy for H.pylori eradication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ten consecutive patients, suffering from dyspeptic symptoms, with H.pylori infection, were randomly allocated to one of the following 2 groups with different therapeutic regimens: A) omeprazole 20 mg/day for 7 days, tinidazole 500 mg bid for 7 days, clarithromycin 250 mg bid for 7 days (55 pts, 20 with peptic ulcer); B) omeprazole 20 mg bid for 14 days, amoxycillin 1000 mg bid for 14 days (55 pts, 28 with peptic ulcer). The "H.pylori status" was evaluated by means of histology, culture and urease test, at entry and 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Two group A and one group B pts didn't complete the treatment. The H.pylori eradication was obtained in 38 pts of group A (71.69%) (C.I.95%: 55.19176-80.86293), in 31 of group B (58.49%) (C.I.95%: 42.32777-69.7017); on Intention-to-Treat analysis, the rate of eradication gave similar results. Side effects occurred in 9 pts of group A (16.98%), in 8 of group B (14.81%). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term low-dose triple therapy with omeprazole/tinidazole/clarithromycin has a better cost/benefit ratio than long-term dual therapy with omeprazole/amoxycillin in the H.pylori eradication, but it causes more side-effects.     

Combination amoxycillin and metronidazole with famotidine in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori--a randomized, double-blind comparison of a three times daily and twice daily regimen

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of a three times daily (t.i.d.) versus a twice daily (b.i.d.) regimen of combination amoxycillin and metronidazole and famotidine in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and the influence of metronidazole resistance on the outcome of treatment. PATIENTS: Patients selected had unequivocal evidence of H. pylori infection based on the urease test, culture and histology and had either peptic ulcer disease or non-ulcer dyspepsia. DESIGN: The study was a comparative and double-blind study and patients were randomized to receive either amoxycillin 750 mg t.i.d. and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. for 12 days or amoxycillin 1000 mg b.i.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d. for 12 days. Both groups also received famotidine 40 mg for 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients were assessed for successful eradication, defined as absence of bacteria in all tests, at least 4 weeks after completion of antibiotic therapy by repeat gastroscopy. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients were recruited for the study. Two patients defaulted follow-up, two patients were withdrawn from the study and six patients were found to be non-compliant with medications. The eradication rates of the t.i.d. regimen was higher than the b.i.d. regimen (per protocol (PP) analysis: 83.3% (50/60) vs. 76.3% (45/59), P=0.337; intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis: 78.5% (51/65) vs. 75.0% (48/64), P=0.642). Seventy-five patients had pre-treatment cultures checked for metronidazole resistance, 33 (44.0%) were found to be resistant. Acquired resistance occurred in 3/40 (7.5%) patients. Eradication rates of metronidazole-sensitive and metronidazole-resistant patients: t.i.d. regimen - 100% (17/17) and 88.2% (15/17), b.i.d. regimen - 19/21 (90.5%) and 11/15 (73.3%). Side effects were reported in up to 70% of patients but were mild and tolerable in the majority. Two patients were withdrawn from the study because of a fixed drug eruption in one and generalized macular rash in the other. CONCLUSION: Combination amoxycillin and metronidazole is effective in eradicating H. pylori. There was a tendency for the t.i.d. regimen to be better than the b.i.d. regimen and for metronidazole-resistant infections to be associated with a lower eradication rate but these differences did not reach statistical significance.     

One-week therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole or ornidazole, followed by 3 weeks' treatment with omeprazole, eradicates Helicobacter pylori equally and heals duodenal ulcer

OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the efficacy of 'triple' 1-week regimens--omeprazole, clarithromycin and a nitroimidazole (metronidazole or ornidazole)--followed by omeprazole, for an additional 3 weeks, on Helicobacter pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer (DU) healing, in a country with a high resistance rate of H. pylori to metronidazole. DESIGN: Open, prospective, two-centre study. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years with active duodenal ulcer (DU), diagnosed by endoscopy and found to be infected with H. pylori (modified Giemsa stain and CLO test, Delta West, Australia), were included in the study. Three triple-drug regimens, given for 7 days, were used. (1) omeprazole (Om) 20 mg once a day, plus clarithromycin (Cl) 250 mg twice daily, plus ornidazole (Or) 500 mg twice daily (O1COr); (2) Om 20 mg twice daily, plus Cl 250 mg twice daily, plus Or 500 mg twice daily (OCOr); and (3) Om 20 mg twice daily, plus Cl 250 mg twice daily, plus metronidazole (M) 500 mg twice daily (OCM). Two hundred and three consecutive H. pylori-positive patients were included in the study, randomly assigned as follows: 50 patients (group A1: 32 men, 18 women, age 23-77 years) on O1COr; 47 patients (group A2: 29 men, 18 women, age 27-77 years) on OCOr; and 106 (group B: 71 men, 35 women, age 18-83 years) on OCM. Ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication were assessed endoscopically, 8-9 weeks after the start of treatment. H. pylori was considered eradicated if both histology and rapid urease test (six biopsies, antrum-body) were negative. RESULTS: Eleven patients were lost to follow-up; 192 patients were analysed. Group A1: 48; group A2: 44; group B: 100. 'Per-protocol' analysis: H. pylori eradication, 90-93% (P = 0.901); ulcer healing, 90-98% (P = 0.300). 'Intention to treat' analysis: H. pylori eradication, 85-88% (P = 0.887); ulcer healing, 86-91% (P = 0.657). Compliance was excellent, no serious side effects were observed and no patients withdrew due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in the H. pylori eradication and the healing rate among the groups. It seems that twice daily omeprazole is no better than single daily dosage and that ornidazole is as effective as metronidazole. In addition, in the studied population which is believed to have a high prevalence of metronidazole resistance, all the regimens used were effective.     

Does Helicobacter pylori infection affect gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia?

The objectives of the study were first, to determine if gastric emptying was altered in patients with functional dyspepsia with and without Helicobacter pylori infection compared with normal healthy volunteers; and second, to determine if there were further alterations in gastric emptying when the infection was eradicated. Gastric emptying was measured using a 99mtechnetium radiolabelled solid meal and gastric emptying time was measured as t1/2, viz. time taken for half the radiolabelled meal to be emptied from the stomach. The mean gastric emptying time for H. pylori-positive patients (n=20) was 56.4+/-24.8 min; H. pylori-negative patients (n=19) 67.8+/-31.8 min; and normal controls (n=20) 58.8+/-18.8min. No significant difference was obtained between the groups (ANOVA; P=0.348). Thirteen of 18 H. pylori-positive patients successfully eradicated the infection following treatment with omeprazole 40 mg o.m. and amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s. for 2 weeks. The mean difference in the gastric emptying time before and after H. pylori eradication was 23.9+/-13.2 min (P= 0.556). There was no significant difference in the frequency of specific dyspeptic symptoms as well as the overall mean symptom score between the H. pylori-positive and -negative patients. Gastric emptying was not different between patients with functional dyspepsia and normal controls. Helicobacter pylori infection does not appear to affect gastric emptying in patients with functional dyspepsia.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori with lansoprazole, roxithromycin and metronidazole--an open pilot study

BACKGROUND: The most extensively studied Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen comprises omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole. Macrolide antibiotics other than clarithromycin should achieve similar efficacy, but they have not yet been thoroughly tested. AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of a triple therapy regimen using lansoprazole, roxithromycin, and metronidazole on the basis of multicentre outpatient care in an open pilot study. METHODS: 163 patients with duodenal ulcer and proven H. pylori infection received lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., roxithromycin 300 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. for 7 days followed by another 7 days of lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. H. pylori status was determined by urease quick test, histology, microbiology and 13C-urea breath test before starting and at least 4 weeks after completing treatment. RESULTS: 150 patients were available for evaluation; H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 84.7% (127/ 150) as determined by urease quick test, 78.0% (117/150) by histology, 81.3% (109/134) by 13C-urea breath test; and in 75.3% (113/150), at least two tests were negative. Side-effects were reported in 34 patients (most commonly diarrhoea and changes in liver function tests), in two cases the study medication was interrupted. Prior to treatment, 23% of the H. pylori isolates were resistant against metronidazole and 3.4% against roxithromycin. After unsuccessful treatment, 84% of the isolates were resistant against metronidazole and 21% against roxithromycin. Primary resistance to metronidazole increased the chance of treatment failure approximately sevenfold (7% vs. 53%). CONCLUSIONS: For H. pylori eradication, the combination of lansoprazole, roxithromycin and metronidazole proved to be as safe as other current triple therapy regimens, while a comparison of efficacy rates yet remains to be assessed in prospective controlled trials. The metronidazole-resistant H. pylori is not rare in Germany and, in the present study, has strongly influenced treatment success.     

One-week use of ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxycillin and clarithromycin for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors have been widely used in combination with amoxycillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. AIM: To study the effects of 1-week ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple therapy in the treatment of H. pylori-related duodenal ulcers. METHOD: Patients with duodenal ulcers and H. pylori infection were prospectively randomized to receive either RBC with amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (RAC), or omeprazole with amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (OAC). No additional ulcer healing drug was used after the 1-week medication. Patients were assessed for H. pylori eradication, ulcer healing and side-effects after receiving the therapies. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were recruited to this study, with 50 patients randomized to each treatment group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, duodenal ulcers were completely healed in 45 (90%) patients in the RAC group and 43 (89.6%) in the OAC group (P = 1.0). H. pylori eradication was confirmed in 47 (94%) in the RAC group and 42 (87.5%) in the OAC group (P = 0.31). There was no significant difference in the severity of side-effects experienced by the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: One-week RBC-based triple therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori-related duodenal ulcers. The therapeutic effects are comparable to a 1-week course of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy.