Crystallization behavior and crystal structure of poly(ethylene‐co‐trimethylene terephthalate)s

A series of random copolymers were synthesized by the bulk polycondensation of dimethyl terephthalate with ethylene glycol (EG) and propane‐1,3‐diol (PDO) in various compositions. Their composition and thermal properties were investigated. The copolymers with 57.7 mol % or more PDO or 14.4 mol % or less PDO were crystallizable, but those with 36–46.2 mol % PDO were amorphous. The nonisothermal crystallization behavior was investigated with varying cooling rates by DSC. Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) homopolymers have relatively lower activation energy than their copolymers. PET‐rich copolymers (EG > 85.9%) exhibited PET crystal structure, and exhibited no PTT crystal structure; and PTT‐rich copolymers (PDO > 41.7%) exhibited PTT crystal structure, and exhibited no PET crystal structure. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Synthesis and characterization of poly(ethylene‐co‐trimethylene terephthalate)s

Taking advantage of a melt polycondensation process, a series of copolyesters composed of pure terephthalate acid (PTA), ethylene glycol (EG), and 1,3‐propanediol (1,3‐PDO) were synthesized. The component, molecular weight, molecular weight distribution, and thermal properties of the copolymers were characterized. The results show that the contents of trimethylene terephthalate (TT) units in the resulting copolyesters are higher than PDO compositions in original diol. Oligomer content in the copolyesters varies with the compositions and attains a minimum value when the TT ingredient is 49.52 mol %. The glass transition temperature (T_g) of the copolyesters varies from 78.5°C for PET (polyethylene terephthalate) to 43.5°C for PTT (polytrimethylene terephthalate) and decreases monotonically with the components. The copolyesters are amorphous copolymers when TT content is in the range of 32.4–40.8 mol %, as calculated from the melting enthalpy (ΔH_m) measured via differential scanning calorimetry. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1511–1521 2006     

Synthesis and non‐isothermal crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene phthalate‐co‐terephthalate)s

A series of poly(ethylene phthalate‐co‐terephthalate)s were synthesized by melt polycondensation of ethylene glycol (EG) with dimethyl phthalate (DMP) and dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) in various proportions. The DMT‐rich polymers were obtained with reasonably high molecular weights, whereas the DMP‐rich polymers were synthesized with relatively low molecular weights due to steric effects associated with the highly kinked DMP monomer. The compositions and thermal properties of the polymers were determined. The copolymers containing DMP in amounts of ≤ 21 mol% were crystallizable, whereas the other polymers were not. All the polymers exhibited a single glass transition temperature. Analysis of the measured glass transition temperatures and crystal melting temperatures confirmed that the DMT‐rich copolymers are random copolymers. The non‐isothermal crystallization behaviors of the DMT‐rich copolymers were investigated by calorimetry and modified Avrami analysis. The Avrami exponents n were found to range from 2.7 to 3.8, suggesting that the copolymers crystallize via a heterogeneous nucleation and spherulitic growth mechanism; that is, the incorporation of DMP units as the minor component does not change the growth mechanism of the copolymers. In addition, the activation energies of the crystallizations of the copolymers were determined; the copolymers were found to have higher activation energies than the PET homopolymer. Polym. Eng. Sci. 44:1682–1691, 2004. © 2004 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Crystallization of 2‐methyl‐1,3‐propanediol substituted poly(ethylene terephthalate). I. Thermal behavior and isothermal crystallization

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to evaluate the thermal behavior and isothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) copolymers containing 2‐methyl‐1,3‐propanediol as a comonomer unit. The addition of comonomer reduces the melting temperature and decreases the range between the glass transition and melting point. The rate of crystallization is also decreased with the addition of this comonomer. In this case it appears that the more flexible glycol group does not significantly increase crystallization rates by promoting chain folding during crystallization, as has been suggested for some other glycol‐modified PET copolyesters. The melting behavior following isothermal crystallization was examined using a Hoffman–Weeks approach, showing very good linearity for all copolymers tested, and predicted an equilibrium melting temperature (T_m⁰) of 280.0°C for PET homopolymer, in agreement with literature values. The remaining copolymers showed a marked decrease in T_m⁰ with increasing copolymer composition. The results of this study support the claim that these comonomers are excluded from the polymer crystal during growth. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 2592–2603, 2006     

Crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of poly[(trimethylene terephthalate)‐co‐(29 mol % ethylene terephthalate)] copolyester

The copolyester was characterized as having 71 mol % trimethylene terephthalate units and 29 mol % ethylene terephthalate units in a random sequence according to the NMR spectra. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) was used to investigate the isothermal crystallization kinetics in the temperature range (T_c) from 130 to 170°C. The melting behavior after isothermal crystallization was studied using DSC and temperature‐modulated DSC by varying the T_c, the crystallization time, and the heating rate. The DSC thermograms and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction patterns reveal that the complex melting behavior involves melting‐recrystallization‐remelting and different lamellar crystals. As the T_c increases, the contribution of recrystallization gradually falls and finally disappears. A Hoffman‐Weeks linear plot yields an equilibrium melting temperature of 198.7°C. The kinetic analysis of the growth rates of spherulites and the change in the morphology from regular to banded spherulites indicate that a regime II→III transition occurs at 148°C. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Thermal behavior and tensile properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐ethylene isophthalate)

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene isophthalate) (PEI) homopolymers were synthesized by the two‐step melt polycondensation process of ethylene glycol (EG) with dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) and/or dimethyl isophthalate (DMI), respectively. Nine copolymers of the above three monomers were also synthesized by varying the mole percent of DMI with respect to DMT in the initial monomer feed. The thermal behavior was investigated over the entire range of copolymer composition by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The glass transition (T_g), cold crystallization (T_cc), melting (T_m), and crystallization (T_c) temperatures have been determined. Also, the gradually increasing proportion of ethyleno‐isophthalate units in the virgin PET drastically differentiated the tensile mechanical properties, which were determined, and the results are discussed. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 78: 200–207, 2000     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(1,4‐butylene‐co‐ethylene terephthalate)

The crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and their copolymers poly(1,4‐butylene‐co‐ethylene terephthalate) (PBET) containing 70/30, 65/35 and 60/40 molar ratios of 1,4‐butanediol/ethylene glycol were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at crystallization temperatures (T_c) which were 35–90 °C below equilibrium melting temperature . Although these copolymers contain both monomers in high proportion, DSC data revealed for copolymer crystallization behaviour. The reason for such copolymers being able to crystallize could be due to the similar chemical structures of 1,4‐butanediol and ethylene glycol. DSC results for isothermal crystallization revealed that random copolymers had a lower degree of crystallinity and lower crystallite growth rate than those of homopolymers. DSC heating scans, after completion of isothermal crystallization, showed triple melting endotherms for all these polyesters, similar to those of other polymers as reported in the literature. The crystallization isotherms followed the Avrami equation with an exponent n of 2–2.5 for PET and 2.5–3.0 for PBT and PBETs. Analyses of the Lauritzen–Hoffman equation for DSC isothermal crystallization data revealed that PBT and PET had higher growth rate constant G_o, and nucleation constant K_g than those of PBET copolymers. © 2001 Society of Chemical Industry     

Nonisothermal crystallization behavior of biodegradable poly(butylene terephthalate‐co‐butylene adipate‐co‐ethylene terephthalate‐co‐ethylene adipate) copolyester

A series of biodegradable aliphatic‐aromatic copolyester, poly(butylene terephthalate‐co‐butylene adipate‐co‐ethylene terephthalate‐co‐ethylene adipate) (PBATE), were synthesized from terephthalic acid (PTA), adipic acid (AA), 1,4‐butanediol (BG) and ethylene glycol (EG) by direct esterification and polycondensation. The nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PBATE copolyesters was studied by the means of differential scanning calorimeter, and the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics were analyzed via the Avrami equation modified by Jeziorny, Ozawa analysis and Z.S. Mo method, respectively. The results show that the crystallization peak temperature of PBATE copolyesters shifted to lower temperature at higher cooling rate. The modified Avrami equation could describe the primary stage of nonisothermal crystallization of PBATE copolyesters. The value of the crystallization half‐time (t_1/2) and the crystallization parameter (Z_c) indicates that the crystallization rate of PBATE copolyesters with more PTA content was higher than that with less PTA at a given cooling rate. Ozawa analysis was not suitable to study the nonisothermal crystallization process of PBATE copolyesters, but Z.S. Mo method was successful in treatingthis process. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Preparation and biodegradation of copolyesters based on poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene glycol)/oligo(lactic acid) by transesterification

The poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐ethyleneoxide‐co‐DL ‐lactide) copolymers were successfully prepared by the melt reaction between poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(ethylene glycol), and DL ‐oligo(lactic acid) without any catalysts. The transesterification between ethylene terephthalate, ethyleneoxide, and lactide segments during the reaction was confirmed by the ¹H NMR analysis. The effect of reaction temperatures and the starting feed ratios on the molecular microstructures, molecular weights, solubility, thermal properties, and degradability of the copolyesters was extensively studied. The values of crystallization temperature, melting temperature, crystallization, and melting enthalpy of the copolyesters were found to be influenced by the reaction temperatures, starting feed ratios, etc. The copolyesters showed good tensile properties and were found to degrade in the soil burial experiments during the period of 3 months. The morphology of the copolyester films were also investigated by scanning electron microscopy during soil burial degradation. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate) copolyesters obtained from ethylene terephthalate and isophthalate oligomers

A series of poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate) copolyesters containing upto 50%‐mole of isophthalic units were prepared by polycondensation from ethylene terephthalate and ethylene isophthalate fractions of linear oligomers containing from 5 to 6 repeating units in average. The polyesters were obtained in good yields and with high‐molecular‐weights. The microstructure of the copolyesters was studied as a function of reaction time by ¹³C‐NMR showing that a random distribution of the comonomers was achieved since the earlier stages of polycondensation. The melting temperature and enthalpy of the copolyesters decreased with the content of isophthalic units so that copolyesters containing more than 25% of these units were amorphous. Isothermal crystallization studies made on crystalline copolyesters revealed that the crystallization rate of copolyesters decreased with the content in isophthalic units. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Synthesis of novel biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) copolyesters composing of isosorbide and poly(ethylene glycol)

A series of biodegradable isosorbide‐based copolyesters poly(butylene succinate‐co‐isosorbide succinate‐co‐polyethyleneoxide succinate) (PB_xI_yE_zS) were synthesized via bulk polycondensation in the presence of dimethyl succinate (DMS), 1,4‐butanediol (BDO), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and isosorbide (ISO). The crystallization behaviors, crystal structure and spherulite morphology of the copolyesters were analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD) and polarizing optical microscopy (POM), respectively. The results indicate that the crystallization behavior of the copolyesters was influenced by the content of isosorbide succinate (IS) and polyethyleneoxide succinate (PEOS) units, which further tuned the mechanical and biodegradable properties of the copolyesters. The PB_xI_yE_zS copolyesters, compared to pure poly(butylene succinate), showed lower crystallization temperature, melting temperature, degree of crystallinity and degradation rate while a significant increase in glass transition temperature with increasing isosorbide content. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Synthesis and thermal characterization of random poly(butylene terephthalate‐co‐2‐methyl‐ethylene terephthalate) copolyesters

Poly(butylene terephthalate‐co‐2‐methyl‐ethylene terephthalate) (PBT/MET) was synthesized by incorporating 1,2‐propandiol(1,2‐PDO) into PBT chains. The molar composition and chemical structure of PBT/MET copolyesters were confirmed by means of FT‐IR and ¹H‐NMR. To investigate the effect of 1,2‐PDO on the thermal properties of PBT/MET copolyesters, the copolymerizations were carried out by varying various contents of MET units, and the prepared materials were evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. Results suggested that with the increase of the content of 1,2‐PDO, the amount of crystallinity and the melting temperature decline, while the glass transition temperature increases and the copolyesters become more transparent and brittle with respect to PBT homopolymer. In addition, the T_g‐composition and T_m‐composition data are well subjected to the Wood equation and Flory's equation, respectively. All these copolyesters are found to consist of the general trend displayed by copolymers reported elsewhere. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Multiple melting and partial miscibility of ethylene‐vinyl acetate copolymer/low density polyethylene blends

Multiple melting behaviors and partial miscibility of ethylene‐vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer/low density polyethylene (LDPE) binary blend via isothermal crystallization are investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). Crystallization temperature T (°C) is designed as 30, 50, 70, 80°C with different crystallization times t (min) of 10, 30, 60, 300, 600 min. The increase of crystallization temperature and time can facilitate the growth in lateral crystal size, and also the shift of melting peak, which means the completion of defective secondary crystallization. For blends of various fractions, sequence distribution of ethylene segments results in complex multiple melting behaviors during isothermal crystallization process. Overlapping endothermic peaks and drops of equilibrium melting points of LDPE component extrapolated from Hoffman–Weeks plots clarify the existence of partial miscibility in crystalline region between EVA and LDPE. WAXD results show that variables have no perceptible influence on the predominant existence of orthorhombic crystalline phase structure. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Synthesis and properties of poly(trimethylene terephthalate‐co‐2‐methyl‐ethylene terephthalate) random copolyesters

Poly(trimethylene terephthalate‐co‐2‐methyl‐ ethylene terephthalate) random copolymers of various compositions were synthesized via traditional two‐step polycondensation by incorporating of 1,2‐propanediol. The molar composition of trimethylene terephthalate and 2‐methyl‐ethylene terephthalate units and chemical structure were confirmed by means of ¹H‐NMR and Fourier transform infrared. The thermal properties of the copolyesters were evaluated by DSC and TGA. As far as the thermal properties is concerned, the main effect of incorporation of 1,2‐propanediol was a lowering in the melting temperature, and an increment of glass transition temperature compared to homopolymer PTT. Due to the effect of the lateral methyl groups in the polymeric chain, the thermal stability is slightly decreased as the amount of the MET units is increased. Furthermore, the crystals of PTT/MET copolyesters were observed by hot‐stage optical polarizing microscopy at the indicated crystallization temperatures. As expected, the incorporation of MET units in the polymer chain of PTT was found to decrease the dimension of the crystals. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Melting,crystallization behaviors,and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PET/PTT/PBT ternary blends

The melting, crystallization behaviors, and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of the ternary blends composed of poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) and poly(buthylene terephthalate) (PBT) were studied with differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). PBT content in all ternary blends was settled invariably to be one‐third, which improved the melt‐crystallization temperature of the ternary blends. All of the blend compositions in amorphous state were miscible as evidenced by a single, composition‐dependent glass transition temperature (T_g) observed in DSC curves. DSC melting thermograms of different blends showed different multiple melting and crystallization peaks because of their various polymer contents. During melt‐crystallization process, three components in blends crystallized simultaneously to form mixed crystals or separated crystals depending upon their content ratio. The Avrami equation modified by Jeziorny and the Ozawa theory were employed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of two selected ternary blends. The results spoke that the Avrami equation was successful in describing the nonisothermal crystallization process of the ternary blends. The values of the t_1/2 and the parameters Z_c showed that the crystallization rate of the ternary blends with more poly(ethylene terephthalate) content was faster than that with the lesser one at a given cooling rate. The crystal morphology of the five ternary blends investigated by polarized optical microscopy (POM) showed different size and distortional Maltese crosses or light spots when the PTT or poly(ethylene terephthalate) component varied, suggesting that the more the PTT content, the larger crystallites formed in ternary blends. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Biodegradable poly(ethylene succinate) blends and copolymers containing minor amounts of poly(butylene succinate)

Poly(ethylene succinate) (PES), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), and PES‐rich copolyesters were synthesized using an effective catalyst, titanium tetraisopropoxide. PES was blended with minor amounts of PBS for the comparison. The compositions of the copolyesters and the blends were determined from NMR spectra. Their thermal properties were studied using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), a temperature modulated DSC (TMDSC), and a thermogravimetric analyzer. No significant difference exists among the thermal stabilities of these polyesters and blends. For the blends, the reversible curves of TMDSC showed a distinct glass‐rubber transition temperature (T_g), however, the variation of the T_g values with the blend compositions was small. Isothermal crystallization kinetics and the melting behavior after crystallization were examined using DSC. Wide‐angle X‐ray diffractograms (WAXD) were obtained for the isothermally crystallized specimens. The results of DSC and WAXD indicate that the blends have a higher degree of crystallinity and a higher melting temperature than those of the corresponding copolymers. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Crystallization of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene octene) blends: Isothermal crystallization

Poly(ethylene‐octene) (POE), maleic anhydride grafted poly(ethylene‐octene) (mPOE), and a mixture of POE and mPOE were added to poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) to prepare PBT/POE, PBT/mPOE, and PBT/mPOE/POE blends by a twin‐screw extruder. Observation by scanning electron microscopy revealed improved compatibility between PBT and POE in the presence of maleic anhydride groups. The melting behavior and isothermal crystallization kinetics of the blends were studied by wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimeter; the kinetics data was delineated by kinetic models. The addition of POE or mPOE did not affect the melting behavior of PBT in samples quenched in water after blending in an extrude. Subsequent DSC scans of isothermally crystallized PBT and PBT blends exhibited two melting endotherms (T_mI and T_mII). T_mI was the fusion of the crystals grown by normal primary crystallization and T_mII was the melting peak of the most perfect crystals after reorganization. The dispersed second phase hindered the crystallization; on the other hand, the well dispersed phases with smaller size enhanced crystallization because of higher nucleation density. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Modification of the thermal properties and crystallization behaviour of poly(ethylene terephthalate) by copolymerization

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) is a widely used polyester, which can be crystallized from the melt over a wide range of supercooling conditions or, alternatively, quenched into the amorphous state and, subsequently, crystallized by thermal treatment above the glass‐transition temperature. It is well known that the crystallization of PET can be hindered by means of copolymerization or reactive blending. The incorporation of comonomeric units into the polymer backbone leads to an irregular chain structure and thereby inhibits regular chain packing for crystallization. The crystallization of PET copolyesters is strongly influenced by the chain microstructure regarding comonomer distribution, randomness and length of the crystallizable ethylene terephthalate sequences. This paper is mainly devoted to the thermally induced crystallization behaviour of PET and to reviewing the efforts that have been made in the last decade to modify the glass‐transition and melting temperatures, the crystallinity and the crystallization rate of this polyester. Furthermore, some illustrative experimental data obtained from isothermal and non‐isothermal crystallization of PET are included in this study. © 2003 Society of Chemical Industry     

Implementing plant‐derived isosorbide and isomannide as comonomers for polyester synthesis: Effects of crystallization properties on optical properties

This article describes the implementation of plant‐derived isosorbide (IS) and isomannide (IM) in the copolymerization modification of poly(ethylene terephthalate). The effects of the two comonomers on the optical, crystallization, and thermal properties of the resulting copolyesters were studied using the following analytical methods: proton nuclear magnetic resonance; differential scanning calorimetry; X‐ray diffraction; thermogravimetry; and ultraviolet‐visible spectroscopy. As comonomers, IS and IM increased the transmittance and reduced the haze of the copolyesters. Moreover, while IM improved the optical properties more than did IS, both monomers improved the optical properties of the copolyesters by lowering its crystallization ability. After the copolymerization modification, the crystallization rate of the copolyesters was reduced, decreasing the crystallinity and crystal size and thereby reducing the light transmission interference. The comonomers also altered the light absorption properties of the copolyesters and conferred a substantial increase in the transmittance of near‐infrared (NIR) wavelengths. These changes in optical properties exhibit the potential of these comonomers for applications in optical materials and NIR detectors. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017 , 134, 45444.