Radiofrequency ablation for atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia: comparison between fast (anterior) and slow (posterior) pathway ablation

OBJECTIVES: We compared the electrophysiologic effects on atrioventricular (AV) node physiology of selective "fast" versus selective "slow" pathway radiofrequency ablation in 42 patients with drug-resistant AV node reentrant tachycardia who underwent 51 ablation attempts to prevent tachycardia recurrence while preserving AV conduction. BACKGROUND: The recent introduction of radiofrequency ablation to treat AV node reentrant tachycardia allows the opportunity to study the effects of selective elimination of the different limbs involved in AV node reentrant tachycardia. METHODS: Selective fast pathway ablation was attempted in 13 patients by delivering radiofrequency energy anteriorly across the tricuspid valve anulus. Selective slow pathway ablation was attempted in 29 patients by delivering radiofrequency energy posteriorly across the tricuspid valve anulus at sites where putative slow pathway potentials were recorded. RESULTS: Selective fast pathway ablation eliminated AV node reentrant tachycardia without AV block in 6 (46%) of 13 patients after one ablation session and in an additional 3 patients (69% of total) after repeat ablation sessions. Slow pathway ablation eliminated AV node reentrant tachycardia without AV block in 26 (90%) of 29 patients after one radiofrequency ablation session and in an additional 2 patients (97% of total) after repeat ablation sessions. Selective fast pathway ablation increased the PR interval (140 to 220 ms, p = 0.0001) and AH interval (66 to 153 ms, p = 0.0001), whereas slow pathway ablation did not change these intervals. Fast pathway radiofrequency ablation caused retrograde block in 7 (64%) of 11 patients, whereas no patients undergoing slow pathway ablation developed selective retrograde block. Single AV node echo beats were commonly induced after slow but not fast pathway ablation (17 of 29 patients vs. 1 of 11 patients, respectively, p = 0.01) and did not predict recurrence of AV node reentrant tachycardia. CONCLUSIONS: Successful selective radiofrequency ablation of fast or slow pathways in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia resulted in different electrophysiologic properties after ablation. Slow pathway ablation produced more successful outcomes, with a decreased prevalence of recurrent AV node reentrant tachycardia or AV block.     

A simple technique for selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVES: A simple technique was designed for radiofrequency ablation therapy of atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia. BACKGROUND: This technique was based on the hypothesis that slow pathway conduction reflects conduction through the compact node and its posterior atrial input. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients were studied; there were 37 men and 63 women, with a mean age of 48 +/- 15 years. All 100 patients had induction of sustained tachycardia with (51 patients) or without (49 patients) administration of isoproterenol or atropine, or both. The ablation catheter was initially manipulated to record the largest His bundle deflection from the apex of Koch's triangle. It was then curved downward and clockwise to the area of the compact node when His deflection was no longer visible and the ratio of atrial to ventricular electrogram was < 1. The radiofrequency current was delivered from the 4-mm tip electrode a mean of 5 +/- 7 times at a power of 25 +/- 4 W for a duration of 21 +/- 4 s. The total fluoroscopic time was 19 +/- 11 min. RESULTS: Selective ablation (56 patients) or modification (26 patients) of the slow pathway without affecting anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction was achieved in 82 patients. Ablation or modification of both the retrograde fast pathway and the slow pathway but with preservation of anterograde fast pathway conduction was noted in 12 patients. Ablation or modification of the retrograde fast pathway alone or both anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction was noted in three patients. Complete AV node block occurred in three patients. Seventy-three patients had no induction of echo beats or tachycardia and 24 patients had induction of a single echo beat after ablation. Follow-up study was performed in 62 patients 76 +/- 18 days after ablation. Thirty-nine patients had no induction of echo beats or tachycardia, 22 had induction of echo beats alone and 1 patient had induction of sustained tachycardia. CONCLUSION: Selective ablation of the slow AV node pathway can be achieved by a simple procedure with a high success rate and few complications.     

Induction of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia with adenosine: differential effect of adenosine on fast and slow atrioventricular node pathways

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the sensitivity of fast and slow atrioventricular (AV) node pathways to incremental doses of adenosine in patients with typical AV node reentrant tachycardia. BACKGROUND: Although adenosine is known to depress conduction through the AV node, the relative sensitivity to adenosine of the anterograde fast and slow pathways in patients with dual AV node pathways and typical AV node reentrant tachycardia has not previously been studied. METHODS: Sixteen patients with dual AV node physiology and typical AV node reentrant tachycardia and 10 control patients were given incremental doses of adenosine during atrial pacing. RESULTS: In 14 of 16 patients with dual-AV node physiology, administration of small doses of adenosine during atrial pacing led consistently to transient block of impulse conduction in the fast pathway before block in the slow pathway, resulting in abrupt prolongation of the AH interval with continued 1:1 AV conduction. The mean (+/- SD) doses of adenosine required to cause conduction block in the fast and slow pathways were 2.7 +/- 3.0 and 7.2 +/- 4.7 mg, respectively (p = 0.004). In 9 of 16 patients, administration of low dose adenosine led to initiation of AV node reentrant tachycardia. The control patients showed no abrupt increases in AH interval with administration of adenosine during atrial pacing. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with dual AV node pathways and typical AV node reentrant tachycardia, the fast pathway is more sensitive than the slow pathway to the effects of adenosine.     

Randomized comparison of anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches to ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare in random fashion an anatomic and an electrogram mapping approach for ablation of the slow pathway of atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia. BACKGROUND: Ablation of the slow pathway in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia can be performed by using either an anatomic or an electrogram mapping approach to identify target sites for ablation. These two approaches have never been compared prospectively. METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with typical AV node reentrant tachycardia were randomly assigned to undergo either an anatomic or an electrogram mapping approach for ablation of the slow AV node pathway. In 25 patients randomly assigned to the anatomic approach, sequential radiofrequency energy applications were delivered along the tricuspid annulus from the level of the coronary sinus ostium to the His bundle position. In 25 patients assigned to the electrogram mapping approach, target sites along the posteromedial tricuspid annulus near the coronary sinus ostium were sought where there was a multicomponent atrial electrogram or evidence of a possible slow pathway potential. If the initial approach was ineffective after 12 radiofrequency energy applications, the alternative approach was then used. RESULTS: The anatomic approach was effective in 21 (84%) of 25 patients, and the electrogram mapping approach was effective in all 25 patients (100%) randomly assigned to this technique (p = 0.1). The four patients with an ineffective anatomic approach had a successful outcome with the electrogram mapping approach. On the basis of intention to treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the electrogram mapping approach and the anatomic approach with respect to the time required for ablation (28 +/- 21 and 31 +/- 31 min, respectively, mean +/- SD, p = 0.7) duration of fluoroscopic exposure (27 +/- 20 and 27 +/- 18 min, respectively, p = 0.9) or mean number of radiofrequency applications delivered (6.3 +/- 3.9 vs. 7.2 +/- 8.0, p = 0.6). With both the anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches, the atrial electrogram duration and number of peaks in the atrial electrogram were significantly greater at successful target sites than at unsuccessful target sites. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches for ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway are comparable in efficacy and duration. If the anatomic approach is initially attempted and fails, the electrogram mapping approach may be successful at sites outside the areas targeted in the anatomic approach. With both the anatomic and electrogram mapping approaches, there are significant differences in the atrial electrogram configuration between successful and unsuccessful target sites.     

Dimension and related anatomical distance of Koch's triangle in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION: The dimension of Koch's triangle in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia has not been well described. Understanding the dimension and anatomical distance related to Koch's triangle might be useful in avoiding accidental AV block during ablation of the slow pathway. The purposes of this study were to define the dimension of Koch's triangle and its related anatomical distance and correlate these parameters with the successful ablation sites in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 218 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The distance between the presumed proximal His-bundle area and the base of the coronary sinus orifice (DHis-OS) measured in the right anterior oblique view was used to define the dimension of Koch's triangle. The distance of the proximal His-bundle recording site from the successful ablation site (DHis-Ab) and the distance as a fraction of the entire length of Koch's triangle (DHis-Ab/DHis-Os) were determined. The mean DHis-Os and DHis-Ab were 25.9 +/- 7.9 and 13.4 +/- 3.8 mm, respectively. DHis-Os negatively correlated with patient age (r = -0.41, P < 0.0001) and body mass index (r = -0.18, P = 0.004). Among the patients with successful ablation sites in the medial area, DHis-Os was longer (27.2 +/- 6.6 vs 24.6 +/- 8.4 mm, P < 0.005), DHis-Ab was similar (12.9 +/- 3.1 vs 13.9 +/- 4.0, P > 0.05) and DHis-Ab/DHis-Os was smaller (0.48 +/- 0.04 vs 0.74 +/- 0.11, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the patients with successful ablation sites in the medial location needed more radiofrequency pulse numbers than those in the posterior location (6 +/- 4 vs 4 +/- 3, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The site of successful slow pathway ablation was consistently about 13 mm from the site recording the proximal His-bundle deflection in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia despite marked variability in the dimensions of Koch's triangle; therefore, patients with large triangles required ablation in the medial region rather than the posterior region. Care should be taken when delivering radiofrequency energy to the posteroseptal area in patients with shorter DHis-Os to avoid injury to AV node.     

Complex electrophysiological characteristics in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with continuous atrioventricular node function curves

BACKGROUND: Although typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with discontinuous AV node function curves has been well studied, there has been a lack of any significant information about AVNRT without evidence of dual AV nodal pathway physiology during atrial extrastimulus testing or atrial pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Group 1 included 9 patients with continuous curves during atrial extrastimulus testing but without a jump (> or = 50 ms) of the atrial-His bundle (AH) interval during incremental atrial pacing. The maximal AH interval during atrial pacing (266 +/- 61 versus 168 +/- 27 ms, P = .007) or extrastimulus testing (290 +/- 60 versus 176 +/- 18 ms, P = .005) shortened significantly after ablation. Antegrade and retrograde AV node properties were similar before and after ablation. Group 2 included 14 patients with continuous curves and a jump of the AH interval during incremental atrial pacing. The atrial pacing cycle length with 1:1 AV conduction and effective refractory period (ERP) of the antegrade AV node increased significantly, whereas the maximal AH interval during atrial pacing (358 +/- 70 versus 203 +/- 28 ms, P = .001) or extrastimulus testing (338 +/- 75 versus 196 +/- 34 ms, P = .002) shortened significantly after ablation. Group 3 included 24 patients with discontinuous curves. The maximal AH interval during atrial pacing or extrastimulus testing and the ERP of the antegrade fast AV node shortened, whereas the ERP of the antegrade AV node increased significantly after ablation. The maximal AH interval before ablation, extent of decrease in maximal AH interval after ablation, ERP of the retrograde AV node before ablation, and tachycardia cycle length were significantly shorter in group 1 than groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: In AVNRT with continuous AV node function curves, dual AV nodal pathway physiology may or may not be demonstrated during atrial pacing. Significant shortening of the maximal AH interval during atrial pacing after radiofrequency ablation suggests successful elimination of AVNRT.     

Malaise scores in adulthood of children and young people who have been in care

Junctional rhythm is commonly observed during radiofrequency catheter ablation of the fast or slow pathways of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, the origin of these beats remains unclear. We analyzed the retrograde atrial activation sequence of 16 patients (mean +/- SD: 41.2 +/- 18.9 years old) undergoing catheter ablation for typical AVNRT with detailed catheter mapping of the triangle of Koch. The earliest atrial activations were concordant during tachycardia and junctional rhythm in only 5 of 16 patients. The findings suggest that junctional rhythm is unlikely to represent direct stimulation of the atrioventricular (AV) node via a discrete slow pathway but rather results from enhanced automaticity from > or =1 sites in the AV nodal transitional zone. The ensuing atrial activation pattern results from anisotropic spread from these sites. In addition, these data imply that the original concept of the AV node comprising 2 anatomically defined pathways may not be valid, and that a functionally defined pathway model may be a more accurate representation.     

Differential effect of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown that the fast pathway is more responsive to adenosine than the slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Little information is available regarding the effect of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effects of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction were evaluated in 116 patients (mean age 47 +/- 16 years) with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Each patient received 12 mg of adenosine during ventricular pacing at a cycle length 20 msec longer than the fast pathway VA block cycle length and during sinus rhythm or atrial pacing at 20 msec longer than the fast pathway AV block cycle length. Anterograde block occurred in 98% of patients compared with retrograde fast pathway block in 62% of patients (P < 0.001). Unresponsiveness of the retrograde fast pathway to adenosine was associated with a shorter AV block cycle length (374 +/- 78 vs 333 +/- 74 msec, P < 0.01), a shorter VA block cycle length (383 +/- 121 vs 307 +/- 49 msec, P < 0.001), and a shorter VA interval during tachycardia (53 +/- 23 vs 41 +/- 17 msec, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Although anterograde fast pathway conduction is almost always blocked by 12 mg of adenosine, retrograde fast pathway conduction is not blocked by adenosine in 38% of patients with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. This indicates that the anterograde and retrograde fast pathways may be anatomically and/or functionally distinct. Unresponsiveness of VA conduction to adenosine is not a reliable indicator of an accessory pathway.     

Transcatheter radiofrequency ablation. Early experience with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias related to accessory atrioventricular and dual atrioventricular nodal pathways

OBJECTIVE: To describe our initial experience with transcatheter radiofrequency ablation, a useful new treatment for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias related to the presence of an accessory atrioventricular (AV) pathway or dual atrioventricular nodal pathways. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and ten patients, including 77 with accessory pathways, 32 with dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways and one with both, underwent electrophysiological studies and were treated with transcatheter radiofrequency ablation in a large metropolitan teaching hospital. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (86%) were without evidence of accessory pathway conduction or inducible supraventricular tachycardia and were free of symptoms after a mean follow-up of 13 months (range, 3.0-51 months). Sixty-six of 79 accessory pathways (83.5%) were ablated including 42 of 46 left-sided (91%), 14 of 21 posteroseptal (66%), six of seven anteroseptal (86%), three of four right-sided and one of one midseptal pathways. Thirty-one patients with AV nodal reentry were successfully treated by ablation of either the slow (12 patients) or fast (19 patients) conducting AV nodal pathway. There was a progressive improvement in the success rate of the first procedure from 17% to 64% with the use of large-tip catheters and from 64% to 91% when a purpose-built radiofrequency generator was employed. Complications occurred in nine patients: cardiac tamponade (two patients); mild mitral regurgitation (four); subclavian vein thrombosis (one); transient cerebral ischaemic attack (one); and non-thrombocytic purpuric rash (one). These occurred predominantly during the early experience and were without long-term sequelae. Late in our experience, one patient developed complete atrioventricular block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In this institution, radiofrequency catheter ablation has been a safe and effective treatment strategy for patients with life-threatening or highly symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmias.     

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways in children and young adults

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation for reentrant tachyarrhythmias in children and young adults. SETTING: A tertiary cardiac referral centre. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Over a 16 month period 22 patients aged less than 20 years (median age 16.5 years) underwent 26 radiofrequency ablation procedures for atrioventricular reentry tachycardia through an accessory pathway. The results of radiofrequency ablation were compared with those in a group of 16 patients (median age 14 years) who had had surgical ablation for atrioventricular reentry tachycardia over a preceding six year period. RESULTS: Ablation of an accessory atrioventricular pathway was accomplished for 18 (76%) of 25 pathways in 16 (73%) of 22 patients. There were no procedure-related complications. Surgery was eventually curative in 15/16 patients (94%). However, three patients required a second open heart surgical procedure because tachyarrhythmia recurred. There were no surgical deaths. Failures for radiofrequency ablation were related to accessory pathway location, and were greater for right free wall and posteroseptal pathways (success rate of 50% and 57% respectively). Recurrence after surgery was also associated with pathways in these locations. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter radiofrequency current ablation was safe and achieved a cure with less patient morbidity and improved cost efficiency. It is an attractive alternative to long-term drug therapy or surgery in older children and adolescents. A higher success rate may be expected with increased experience.     

New evidence that AV node slow pathway conduction directly influences fast pathway function

INTRODUCTION: Shortening of the AV node fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) following successful slow pathway ablation may be a nonspecific effect of energy application at the AV junction or may be due to elimination of a direct effect of slow pathway conduction on the fast pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six consecutive patients (20 women and 6 men; mean age 45 +/- 3 years) with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia who underwent successful slow pathway ablation (defined as complete elimination of dual AV node physiology) were studied. The fast pathway ERP (at a drive train cycle length of 600 msec) was determined prior to ablation (baseline) and following unsuccessful and successful ablation attempts. Successful slow pathway ablation shortened the fast pathway ERP significantly (317 +/- 9 msec; P < 0.001) compared to baseline (386 +/- 12 msec), whereas unsuccessful ablations had no effect (376 +/- 11 msec). Sinus cycle length, the AH interval, and blood pressure were unchanged following successful ablation. Shortening of the fast pathway ERP did not correlate with the number of energy applications or with two measures of the proximity between the slow and the fast pathway. CONCLUSION: These results support the hypothesis that shortening of the fast pathway ERP following slow pathway ablation is due to elimination of a direct effect of slow pathway conduction on fast pathway function rather than a nonspecific effect of repeated energy delivery at the AV junction.     

Adenosine-sensitive atrial reentrant tachycardia originating from the atrioventricular nodal transitional area

INTRODUCTION: Atrial tachycardia shows wide variations in its electrophysiologic properties and sites of origin. We report an atrial tachycardia with ECG manifestations and electrophysiologic characteristics similar to an atypical form of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: This supraventricular tachycardia was observed in 11 patients. It was initiated by atrial extrastimulation with an inverse relationship between the coupling interval of an extrastimulus and the postextrastimulus interval. Its induction was not related to a jump in the AH interval, and its perpetuation was independent of conduction block in AV node. Ventricular pacing during tachycardia demonstrated AV dissociation without affecting the atrial cycle length. A very small dose of adenosine triphosphate (mean 3.9 +/- 1.2 mg) could terminate the tachycardia. The earliest atrial activation during tachycardia was recorded at the low anteroseptal right atrium with a different intra-atrial activation sequence from that recorded during ventricular pacing, where the tachycardia was successfully ablated in 9 of 10 attempted patients. Bidirectional AV nodal conduction remained unaffected after successful ablation. CONCLUSION: There may be an entity of adenosine-sensitive atrial tachycardia probably due to focal reentry within the AV node or its transitional tissues without involvement of the AV nodal pathways. This tachycardia can be ablated without disturbing AV nodal conduction from the right atrial septum.     

Catheter ablation for the common type of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway was attempted in 34 patients with common type of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Radiofrequency energy of 18-32 watts was applied for 30-60 seconds at sites exhibiting atrial-slow pathway potentials or slow potentials. These potentials were recorded at the mid or posterior septum, anterior to the coronary sinus ostium. A mean of two radiofrequency applications successfully eliminated AVNRT in all patients. The incidence of junctional ectopy was significantly higher during 34 effective applications of radiofrequency energy than during 36 ineffective applications (100% versus 17%). Thus, the recording of atrial-slow pathway potentials or slow potentials, and the development of junctional ectopy can be used as a marker for successful ablation. Slow AV nodal conduction was eliminated in 22 patients and persisted without inducible AVNRT in 12. None of the patients had recurrences of AVNRT over a mean follow-up interval of 12 months, and all had preserved AV conduction. Long-term follow-up studies with an electrophysiological method confirmed that the ablation was effective. Transient AV block was observed in only 1 patient, and no major complications were noted. Thus, radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway is highly effective and safe, with a low rate of complication, for the treatment of common type of AVNRT.     

Quantitative analysis of carcinoembryonic antigen messenger RNA in peripheral venous blood and portal blood of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the long-term efficacy of slow-pathway catheter ablation in patients with spontaneous, documented paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) and dual atrioventricular (AV) node pathways but without inducible tachycardia. BACKGROUND: The lack of reproduction of clinical PSVT by programmed electrical stimulation, which is not uncommon in AV node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), is a dilemma in making the decision of the therapeutic end point of radiofrequency catheter ablation. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (group A) with documented but noninducible PSVT and with dual AV node pathways were prospectively studied. Programmed electrical stimulation could induce a single AV node echo beat in 12 patients, double echo beats in 4 patients and none in 11 patients at baseline or during isoproterenol infusion. Of the patients in group A, 16 underwent slow-pathway catheter ablation and 11 did not. The clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics of the 27 patients were compared with those of patients with dual AV node pathways and inducible AVNRT (group B, n = 55) and patients with dual AV node pathways alone without clinical PSVT (group C, n = 47). RESULTS: During 23+/-13 months of follow-up, none of the 16 patients with slow-pathway catheter ablation had recurrence of PSVT. However, 7 of the 11 patients without ablation had PSVT recurrence at 13+/-14 months of follow-up (p < 0.03 by Kaplan-Meier analysis). Compared with groups B and C, group A consisted predominantly of men who had better retrograde AV node conduction and a narrower zone for anterograde slow-pathway conduction. CONCLUSIONS: Slow-pathway catheter ablation is highly effective in eliminating spontaneous PSVT in which the tachycardia is not inducible despite the presence of dual AV node pathways.     

Absence of junctional rhythm during successful slow-pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: The presence of junctional rhythm has been considered to be a sensitive marker of successful slow-pathway ablation. However, in rare cases, junctional rhythm was absent despite multiple radiofrequency applications delivered over a large area in the Koch's triangle, and successful ablation was achieved in the absence of a junctional rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 353 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (143 men and 210 women; mean age, 50+/-17 years) who underwent catheter ablation of the slow pathway. Combined anatomic and electrogram approaches were used to guide ablation. Inducibility of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was assessed after each application of radiofrequency energy. Successful sites were located in the posterior area in 18 (90%) of 20 patients without junctional rhythm during slow-pathway ablation compared with 200 (60%) of 333 patients with junctional rhythm (P<0.001). The fast-slow form of tachycardia was more common in patients without than in those with junctional rhythm (30% versus 3%; P=0.001). At the successful ablation sites, patients with junctional rhythm had a higher incidence of a multicomponent or slow-pathway potential (51% versus 10%; P<0.001), a longer duration of the atrial electrogram (64+/-8 versus 50+/-9 ms; P=0.04), and a smaller atrial/ventricular electrogram amplitude ratio (0.29+/-0.18 versus 0.65+/-0.27; P<0. 001) than those without junctional rhythm. Mean temperatures at successful sites (56+/-6 degreesC versus 58+/-9 degreesC; P=0.57) and incidence of transient AV block (2% versus 0%; P=0.86) were similar between patients with and without junctional rhythms. By multivariate analysis, location of ablation sites, atrial/ventricular electrogram amplitude ratio, absence of a multicomponent or slow-pathway potential, and occurrence of the fast-slow form of tachycardia were independent predictors of the absence of a junctional rhythm during successful slow-pathway ablation. CONCLUSIONS: In some rare cases, successful slow-pathway ablation is possible in the absence of a junctional rhythm.     

Novel form of atrial tachycardia originating at the atrioventricular annulus

We report two patients with reentrant atrial tachycardia that originated at the AV annulus. Atrial tachycardia originated in the posterior portion of mitral annulus in one patient (case 1) and the posterolateral portion of tricuspid annulus in one patient (case 2). Tachycardia was successfully eliminated by RF catheter ablation in both patients, with the catheter placed underneath the mitral valve in case 1 and on the tricuspid annulus in case 2. Spiky potentials were recorded in the diastolic phase of the atrium during tachycardia at the sites of successful ablation. Spiky potentials were also recorded after atrial electrogram during sinus rhythm, and showed decremental properties during atrial pacing. An accelerated atrial rhythm was observed during RF application, and tachycardia could not be induced after ablation in either patient. Tachycardia in these patients seemed to be due to reentrant tachycardia originating in the accessory AV node (Mahaim fiber) without ventricular connection.     

Impact of severity of coronary artery stenosis and the collateral circulation on the functional outcome of dyssynergic myocardium after revascularization in patients with healed myocardial infarction and chronic left ventricular dysfunction

The inferoposterior region of the triangle of Koch is hypothesized to be the location of the atrial insertion of the slow atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway. However, the actual site of conduction slowing in the slow AV nodal pathway is unknown. Entrainment mapping during AV nodal reentry can localize the reentrant pathway as follows: the AH interval measured from the mapping catheter = A'H (where A' is the exit site of the reentrant circuit) minus A'A (the conduction time from A' to the site of mapping); the SH interval during entrainment = SA' (the conduction time from stimulus into the reentry circuit) plus A'H. Thus, in all cases, the SH interval should be greater than or equal to the AH interval, and the deltaAH-SH should increase as distance and conduction time (SA' and A'A) from the reentry circuit increases. Fourteen patients with typical AV nodal reentry (cycle length 346 +/- 62 ms) and 1 with fast-slow (cycle length 430 ms) underwent activation and entrainment mapping from 8 to 12 sites in the triangle of Koch and coronary sinus. Pacing was performed at 2 to 3 mA above threshold, at a cycle length 10 ms shorter than tachycardia. A mapping site was defined as being in close proximity to the circuit if the deltaAH-SH was within 120% of the shortest 20th percentile deltaAH-SH value from all measured sites. In the 14 typical cases, 45 of 83 sites (54%) in the anatomic slow pathway region fulfilled criteria for close proximity to the reentry circuit compared with 13 of 50 sites (26%) outside of this region (p = 0.005). For these patients, the shortest SH interval measured from any entrainment site was 294 +/- 58 ms (89 +/- 10% of tachycardia cycle length, range 70% to 119%), indicating that the site of slow conduction in the slow pathway during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was distal to all mapped sites. Thus, during typical AV nodal reentry, the "slow" pathway does not conduct slowly, and its insertion is located at or within the inferoposterior or midseptal regions in most cases.     

Narrow complex tachycardia with VA block: diagnostic and therapeutic implications

To review our experience with cases of narrow complex tachycardia with VA block, highlighting the difficulties in the differential diagnosis, and the therapeutic implications. Prior reports of patients with narrow complex tachycardia with VA block consist of isolated case reports. The differential diagnosis of this disorder includes: automatic junctional tachycardia, AV nodal reentry with final upper common pathway block, concealed nodofascicular (ventricular) pathway, and intra-Hissian reentry. Between June 1994 and January 1996, six patients with narrow complex tachycardia with episodes of ventriculoatrial block were referred for evaluation. All six patients underwent attempted radiofrequency ablation of the putative arrhythmic site. Three of six patients had evidence suggestive of a nodofascicular tract. Intermittent antegrade conduction over a left-sided nodofascicular tract was present in two patients and the diagnosis of a concealed nodofascicular was made in the third patient after ruling out other tachycardia mechanisms. Two patients had automatic junctional tachycardia, and one patient had atrioventricular nodal reentry with proximal common pathway block. Attempted ablation in the posterior and mid-septum was unsuccessful in patients with nodofascicular tachycardia. In contrast, those with atrioventricular nodal reentry and automatic junctional tachycardia readily responded to ablation. The presence of a nodofascicular tachycardia should be suspected if: (1) intermittent antegrade preexcitation is recorded, (2) the tachycardia can be initiated with a single atrial premature producing two ventricular complexes, and (3) a single ventricular extrastimulus initiates SVT without a retrograde His deflection. The presence of a nodofascicular pathway is common in patients with narrow complex tachycardia and VA block. Unlike AV nodal reentry and automatic junctional tachycardia, the response to ablation is poor.     

Self-monitoring of blood pressure at home: how many measurements are needed?

Inappropriate sinus tachycardia and atrial arrhythmias have been reported after radiofrequency ablation. Previous studies have suggested that cardiac denervation is a possible explanation for these rhythm disturbances. The aim of this study was to investigate possible alterations in autonomic innervation of the heart after ablation using the techniques of heart rate variability (HRV) analysis and metaiodobenzylguanidine (I-123 MIBG) scintigraphy. The subjects of this study were 30 consecutive patients aged 25 to 40 years, without structural heart disease, who underwent radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal slow pathways, and posteroseptal and left lateral accessory pathways because of symptomatic recurrent reentrant tachycardias. Time and frequency domain analysis of HRV after ablation revealed a significant reduction in the indexes of the mean of all 5-minute standard deviation of RR intervals (p = 0.042), low frequency (p = 0.0005), and total frequency (p = 0.008) compared with preablation values in the group of patients who underwent atrioventricular nodal slow pathway ablation. Patients who underwent ablation of a posteroseptal accessory pathway also had significant attenuation of the indexes of standard deviation about the mean RR interval (p = 0.03), standard deviation of 5-minute mean RR intervals (p = 0.006), and low-frequency (p <0.0001), and high-frequency (p <0.0001) components. Significant I-123 MIBG map defects, indicating efferent cardiac sympathetic denervation, were also found in the same groups of patients: atrioventricular nodal group (p = 0.0024), posteroseptal accessory pathway group (p = 0.0007). None of the above changes in HRV and 123-I MIBG scintigraphy were seen in patients who underwent ablation of left lateral accessory pathways. We conclude that radiofrequency ablation in the anterior, mid-, and posterior regions of the low intraatrial septum may disrupt sympathetic fibers located in these regions, causing cardiac sympathetic denervation. The density of these fibers appear to be less along the left atrioventricular groove.     

Effects of enhanced parasympathetic tone on atrioventricular nodal conduction during atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

The effects of various physiologic and pharmacologic stimuli on the anterograde slow pathway in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia are well characterized. We sought to further characterize the nature of anterograde and retrograde conduction during tachycardia and to define the differential input of the parasympathetic nervous system to these pathways. A custom-made neck suction collar was placed to stimulate the carotid body baroreceptors during supraventricular tachycardia. Neck suction at -60 mm Hg was applied and changes in tachycardia cycle length, AH, and ventriculoatrial intervals were measured in 20 patients. These measurements were repeated after intravenous administration of 10 mg of edrophonium to enhance vagal tone. We observed a 15 +/- 6 ms increase in tachycardia cycle length from baseline (p <0.0001) and a 14 +/- 6 ms increase in AH interval (p <0.0001), but no change in the VA interval with neck suction alone. The tachycardia cycle length prolonged 26 +/- 55 ms (p <0.0001) with edrophonium and an additional 12 +/- 43 ms (p <0.001) with neck suction after edrophonium. There was no change in the VA interval before or after edrophonium during neck suction. There were 10 tachycardia terminations in 8 patients during anterograde slow pathway block during neck suction, with tachycardia cycle length prolongation and mean AH prolongation before termination of 45 +/- 37 ms (vs 15 +/- 7 ms increase in AH interval without tachycardia termination, p = 0.10). There were 12 tachycardia terminations in 4 patients with retrograde block during neck suction, only after edrophonium, without any preceding change in tachycardia cycle length during 11 episodes. We conclude that anterograde slow pathway demonstrates gradual conduction slowing with parasympathetic enhancement, whereas retrograde fast pathway responds with abrupt block.