西丰县生态河道治理

阐述了河道治理的现状、治理理念,并根据辽宁省西丰县实际工程经验,针对城区生态治河,农村生态治河推出了新的治理模式,指出了生态治河与治水相统一的治河新方向。     

"以人为本"在北护城河综合治理实践中的应用

"以人为本"在近几年的北京治水实践中得到了逐步体现,清河、转河的治理是对"以人为本"治水理念的尝试、实践,而北护城河综合治理则是"以人为本"在治水实践中的升华与广泛应用。     

丰台区生态治理见成效

正近年来,在北京市及丰台区两级党委及政府的关怀重视下,丰台区水务工作步入快速发展阶段。针对有关丰台区社会经济发展和民生的涉水事务,丰台区按照首都中心城区西南部发展规划和城市功能新定位要求,凭借紧临永定河的优势,大力开展治水、治河、治污与治环境为重点的水生态文明建设。以"三湖一湿地"、马草河及小清河等为标志的河湖优美水环境,有力提升了丰台区建设与发展的整体环境品质,集中体现了丰台区坚持"人水和谐、人与自然和谐"的理念及修复水生态、改善水环境、治理中小河道和防治水污染的治水实践成果。展示     

潘季驯治理黄河实践与杰出贡献——纪念潘季驯500周年诞辰

本文全面分析了明代治河专家潘季驯四次主持治理黄河、淮河、运河的历史经过、历史挑战、治河主张和工程措施。总结了潘季驯在治河思想上的四大理论贡献:(1)提出了黄河治理必须抓住水少沙多、暴涨暴落的基本特征;(2)提出了解决黄河泥沙问题的三个理论(束水攻沙、蓄清刷黄、淤滩固堤)及其相应工程措施;(3)提出了治理清口为中心,建设洪泽湖水利枢纽,全面治理黄、淮、运的跨流域规划思想及相应工程措施;(4)提出了建设系统堤防的思想及其相应工程措施和管理制度。指出了潘季驯治河四个历史贡献:(1)推动治河工程从分流杀势到筑堤束水、固定河槽的根本转变;(2)推动了持续近200年的黄河下游堤防工程和洪泽湖枢纽的大建设;(3)基本保证了京杭运河的畅通;(4)相对减少了黄淮平原的洪水灾害破坏。同时指出,潘季驯治河具有鲜明的实践特征。     

桦甸生态治河技术研究与探索

吉林省中部、东部地区中小河流多采用工程治河,效果不理想,桦甸市通过多年实践探索,运用生态治河理念治理中小河流,建设生态堤脚、绿化堤身、林带巩固河堤,走出了生态治河的新路。生态治河比工程治河省时省力省资金,堤脚、堤防的长期抗侵蚀性能增强,实践应用效果较好,宜于吉林省中部、东部地区大力推广。     

大沽河流域综合治理模式分析

大沽河流域综合治理是青岛治河史上规模最大的建设项目,"水安全、水资源、水环境、水生态、水文化"的思想被充分地融入该项目河道治理工程实践和运行维护管理中。本文全面回顾了大沽河流域综合治理治河思想、建设内容、运行维护手段及取得的效益,系统总结了"治河、管河"的特色模式,提供了系统化思想、全局化布局的治理河道经验。     

东阿县洛神湖水利风景区建设

东阿县洛神湖水利风景区建设,按照新时期"人水和谐"的治水理念,坚持生态治河,文明治河,注重景观设计,在综合考虑风景区经济、社会、环境、生态效益的同时,将人造景观和历史文化进行了完美结合,取得了良好效果。     

北京市朝阳区推行河长制的实践与思考

北京市全面推行河长制的一年多来,城市河湖生态有了明显改善,管水治水效果良好。实践证明,河长制是破解我国现阶段管水治水困局的一把利器。朝阳区在推进河长制的过程中做了许多努力和尝试,发挥了较好的效果。但新制度的发展和成熟需要实践的检验,且需要不断的完善。随着河长制推行的逐步深入,暴露出基层治河、治水过程中的一些问题:如基层河长沟、渠治理理念不到位,沟、渠治理难度较大,沟、渠治理资金短缺等。为解决这些问题,应当加强基层河长的管理和培养,充分挖掘潜力,发挥群众的巨大力量,完善监管机制,强化考核手段,以逐步实现"河长治"。     

全面深化河长制 把“五水共治”进行到底

<正>习近平总书记在浙江工作时,对浙江发展作出"八八战略"重大决策部署,提出"绿水青山就是金山银山""腾笼换鸟、凤凰涅槃"等重要思想,专题研究浙东引水工程和南太湖开发治理工作,强调要用科学发展的理念和方法来研究用水治水节水工作,认真抓好安全饮水、科学调水、有效节水、治理污水等"四水工程"建设。党的十八大以来,习近平总书记多次就治水发表重要论述,深刻回答了我国水治理中的重大理论和现实问题,为我们开展治水工作提供了科学的思想武     

浅谈王化云同志的治河方略

大禹治水,传说甚广,王景治水,史载不详,只以治功见世。唯潘季驯与李仪祉在治河的理论和方法上作了比较科学地回答,并对后世治河产生较大的影响。他们都认为黄河为害的根源在于泥沙。潘季驯主张以水攻沙,而李仪祉提出了上中下游并治的思想。他们分别实现了由治水到治沙及治河由下游到上中下游的转变。只是潘季驯的认识影响了后世300余年的治河活动,而李仪祉的思想,后人理论探讨得多,但具体实践得少。 人民治黄的开拓者之一王化云同志经过长期     

对城市河道综合治理的思考

本文以北京市门头沟区永定河及其支流河道的治理工程为例,分析了旧河道治理模式中存在的问题,提出了河道治理建设的新思路,并介绍了这些新思路在河道治理工程中的应用方法。     

江河水沙变化与治理的新探索

随着人类活动的日益加剧和自然气候的变化,全球江河水沙过程发生了重大变异,对江河治理将产生深远的影响,一些河流的治理方略需随之做相应的调整。本文在分析全球主要江河水沙变化情势的基础上,针对我国江河治理新的探索和实践,提出了从局部治理走向全河治理、通过全河水沙调控协调水沙关系、江河治理与生态环境和经济社会发展紧密结合等江河治理的新理念,试图为新时期我国江河治理提供科技支撑。     

The evolution of water governance in France from the 1960s: disputes as major drivers for radical changes within a consensual framework

ABSTRACT

This paper provides a synthetic presentation of French water governance and its evolution since the 1960s. Through this French experience, it discusses the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) water governance cycle showing disputes as the main drivers of change. France has been a pioneer in introducing water river basin management some 50 years ago. It is also noted for its water services management by local authorities, leaving a significant role to private and public companies. But French water governance has not been frozen since the 1960s and continues to change radically within a framework based upon its unique history.     

河流生态修复技术和实践

河流生态修复的理念逐渐被人们所认知,一些符合生态修复理念的规划设计方法在工程建设中被逐步采用。在水利部科技创新项目和地方政府的支持下,一些河流生态修复示范工程取得了很好的建设效果并发挥了良好的示范效应。文中结合几个案例,介绍近几年在河流生态修复技术和实践方面所取得的部分进展。     

桐乡市河湖管护体制机制的创新

梳理桐乡市河湖管护现状,以问题与需求为导向,探索与破解河湖管护难题,提出了交界区域联动机制、"四位一体"长效保洁机制、"河长制"细化升级、水利管理应用平台建设等一系列创新思想,以期提升桐乡市河湖管护水平,同时也为全国平原河网地区河湖管理提供一定的参考借鉴。     

The European Community Approach to the Protection of Water

ABSTRACT

The integrated management of a natural resources system such as a river basin requires a through understanding of the system and its people. The development and implementation of such a plan of integrated management are not simple or straightforward. This article shows that such a plan should consist of at least several basic premises. These are; conceptual framework consisting of a vision; an analysis of the state of the environment including various trends; regional quantification; and information needs. Other factors that must be enumerated under these broader headings are; key concepts that must be adhered to; trend analysis of the environment; local partnerships; water rights; and how all these factors and concepts are brought together in the development and implementation of a basin-wide framework to manage a river basin. Two case examples are presented, one on the main stem of the Mississippi River showing that it will be extremely difficult to have a unified management concept that could be implemented on this entire basin. The other case example is on the Illinois River with a drainage area of about 29,000 square miles where such an integrated approach has been developed by a broad coalition of private citizens, local, state, and federal agencies; it shows why such an approach could be successful eventually.     

京津冀三地水资源协同保护现状及对策建议

京津冀协同发展是中央在新的历史时期提出的重大国家战略。2014年初和2017年初,习近平总书记先后两次在北京考察工作时就京津冀协同发展做出重要指示。近年来,京津冀三省市为京津冀水环境的共同改善,在跨省市水资源调配、水污染防治联动机制、跨省市流域综合治理等方面开展了大量工作,但是同时也面临着流域治理缺乏统一规划和综合治理理念、跨省市补偿机制尚未建立、流域管理机制不健全等制约三地持续健康发展的共同难题。针对上述问题,从制定统一水资源保护规划和空间管控规划,联手建设京津冀水资源保护区、建立省际生态水量水质补偿机制、完善流域机构职能、加强依法管理以及加强三地水环境科技协同等方面展开了分析研究,随之提出了一些政策性建议,可为今后京津冀三地水环境逐步改善,营造出人水和谐、生态友好、繁荣发展的美丽的京津冀提供技术支持。     

五大发展理念视角下的南流江流域综合管理研究

随着"创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享"五大发展理念的提出,广西壮族自治区在新时期对重要江河的流域管理方面有了新的要求。为了适应新的发展理念,以南流江流域为例,开展了流域综合管理方面的专项分析研究。研究发现,南流江流域存在着水文灾害多发、环境污染较严重、地下水超采、水土流失等一些自然问题以及法律法规不健全、流域管理机构单薄、规划不完善、忽视公众力量和缺乏新技术支撑等一些社会管理方面的问题,在这种背景下以前的流域管理模式显然已不再适用。因此,针对研究结果,基于五大发展理念,借鉴国外成功的经验并结合南流江流域的实际情况提出了一些相应的对策与建议,以提升流域的综合管理水平。     

珠江三角洲河涌整治思路探讨

分析了珠江三角洲河涌在水资源承载力、河道平面和空间、河流水质及流域管理方面存在的主要问题,从防洪排涝、截污治污、岸线保护、清淤除污、蓄引增容、系统重构等方面提出了治理思路。     

Regulated Rivers: Research & Management,Volume 17 Issue 4/5 ‘Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration’ by J.V. Ward,K. Tockner,U. Uehlinger and F. Malard.

The incorrect version of this article was published previously. Please find the correct version, which retains the original pagination, on the next page. The publisher wishes to apologise for this mistake Running water ecology is a young science, the conceptual foundations of which were derived largely from research conducted in Europe and North America. However, virtually all European river corridors were substantially regulated well before the science of river ecology developed. While regulation of North American river systems occurred later than in European systems, river ecology also developed later. Therefore, there is a general impression of rivers as being much less heterogeneous and much more stable than they actually are in the natural state. The thesis of this paper is that established research and management concepts may fail to fully recognize the crucial roles of habitat heterogeneity and fluvial dynamics owing to a lack of fundamental knowledge of the structural and functional features of morphologically intact river corridors. Until quite recently, most concepts in river ecology were based on the implicit assumption that rivers are stable, single‐thread channels isolated from adjacent floodplains. Unfortunately, many rivers are in just such a state, but it should be recognized that this is not the natural condition. This incomplete understanding constrains scientific advances in river ecology and renders management and restoration initiatives less effective. Examples are given of the high level of spatio‐temporal heterogeneity that may be attained in rivers where natural processes still operate on a large scale. The objective of this paper is to promulgate a broader and more integrative understanding of natural processes in river corridors as a necessary prelude to effective river conservation and management. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.