共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
小麦生长期长,需肥量大,根据小麦的营养特点和地力产量水平,设计出小麦专用肥的养分配比为15—6—4,按标准施用,完全可以达到目标产量水平。 相似文献
2.
3.
小麦除草专用肥的研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
通过逐步对小麦综合栽培技术、基本N、P配方、成型专用肥配方mz4到除草专用肥配方等系列研究,优选出mz4-C2(基肥)和mz4-C3(追肥)2个小麦除草专用肥配方,其总株防效分别为79.45%(65d)和75.25%(65d),增产9.74%-22.10%,且对后茬油菜安全。 相似文献
4.
科学施肥是提高小麦产量的关键技术,根据小麦的需肥规律、目标产量、化肥利用率、土壤养分及原料选择,提出碳铵基小麦专用肥的养分配比,施用量及达到的目标产量。 相似文献
5.
南阳德润公司复肥厂利用对辊冷压造粒设备,开发出碳铵基小麦专用肥,取得了明显的施用效果。1氮、磷、钾比例参数的确定小麦生长期长,需肥量多,每生产100 kg小麦籽粒,需从土壤中吸收N 3 kg、P2O51.25 kg、K2O 2.5kg。小麦不同产量水平适宜N、P比与施氮量见表1。表1小麦不同产量水平适宜氮磷比与施氮量667 m2产量水平/kg适宜经验m(N)∶m(P2O5)667 m2产量水平/kg施N量/kg<200 1∶1<300 9~11200~400 1∶0.5 300~400 12~14>400 1∶0.25 400~600 14~16全县土壤平均碱解氮为56 m g/kg,速效磷为16m g/kg,速效钾为125 m g/kg。与大田作物地力分… 相似文献
6.
通过养分释放和吸湿性试验指出:采用包膜肥能使复混肥中氮、磷、钾养分缓慢释放,避免了养分随水流失,达到充分利用养分的目的;包膜肥的吸湿性比同一配方的常规复混肥低,温度愈高则愈显著。 相似文献
7.
8.
太化集团公司化肥厂复肥分厂自1987年投产以来,一直从事复混肥的生产与施肥效果的研究,尤其近几年来,与市、县农科部门密切配合,共同协作,开发了十几个专用肥品种,小麦专用肥就是其中一种。 1 生产工艺及主要质量指标 1.1 原料来源 相似文献
9.
有机-无机烟草专用肥的生产与应用 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
试验研究了有机-无机烟草专用肥养分配比与生产工艺,及其对烟叶产量和品质的影响。与等养分S-NPK农田试验对比结果,烟叶明显增产,每667m2增值168元,中上等烟叶比例增加12.1%。 相似文献
10.
11.
养分资源综合管理与肥料创新——探索化肥行业发展之道 总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7
通过数据,阐明美国以最廉价的生产方法生产化肥,以养分综合利用、合理的种植结构,尽可能减少化肥用量,从而达到化肥高效利用、农业高产、保护环境的多重目标。我国与美国存在较大差距。介绍了中国农业大学资源与环境学院所进行的“养分资源管理”研究项目,从理论到实践上把传统观念中施肥为增产的单一目标,转变到实现高产、优质、资源高效利用和生态环境保护的多重目标。这是缩小我国与美国在化肥施用上差别的最佳途径之一。 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Agronomic and economic evaluation of site-specific nutrient management for irrigated wheat in northwest India 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Harmandeep S. Khurana Steven B. Phillips Bijay-Singh Marcus M. Alley Achim Dobermann Ajmer S. Sidhu Yadvinder-Singh Shaobing Peng 《Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems》2008,82(1):15-31
Similar to other regions of Asia, irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield increases in Punjab, India, have slowed in recent years. Future yield increases may occur in smaller increments
through fine-tuning of crop management mainly by accounting for the large spatial and temporal variation in soil characteristics.
On-farm experiments were conducted from 2002–03 to 2004–05 on 56 irrigated wheat farms (hereafter referred to as ‘sites’)
in six key irrigated rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat regions of Punjab to evaluate an approach for site-specific nutrient management (SSNM). Site-specific N–P–K applications
were calculated by accounting for the indigenous nutrient supply, yield targets, and nutrient demand as a function of the
interactions between N, P, and K. The performance of SSNM was tested for two wheat crops. Compared with the current farmers’
fertilizer practice (FFP), average grain yield increased from 4.2 to 4.8 Mg ha−1, while plant N, P, and K accumulations increased by 12–20% with SSNM. The gross return above fertilizer cost (GRF) was about
13% greater with SSNM than with FFP. Improved timing and/or splitting of fertilizer N increased N recovery efficiency from
0.17 kg kg−1 in FFP plots to 0.27 kg kg−1 in SSNM plots. The agronomic N use efficiency was 63% greater with SSNM than with FFP. As defined in our study, SSNM has
potential for improving yields and nutrient use efficiency in irrigated wheat. Future research must build on the present approach
to develop a more practical way for achieving similar benefits across large areas without site-specific modeling and with
minimum crop monitoring. 相似文献
17.
V. Murugappan G. V. Kothandaraman S. P. Palaniappan T. S. Manickam 《Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems》1988,18(2):117-126
The conventional deduction procedure of computation of soil () and fertilizer () nutrient efficiencies for the amount of fertilizer required for specified yield targets does not make provision of the amount of soil nutrient derived by crops from the available pool of soil nutrients not accounted for in the amount extracted by a soil test procedure. The derivation of two mathematical models, viz., Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Model I [TNAU Model I] and Model II [TNAU Model II] is reported in this paper which aim at computing the soil () and fertilizer () nutrient efficiencies not accounted for by the conventional method.In the case of TNAU Model I, the relationship between the nutrient uptake (U) and the soil (S) and the fertilizer (F) nutrients was established by assuming a functional relationship of the type U =S +F such that 0 1 and 0 1. In TNAU Model II the same relationship was established as U =S +F + such that 0 1, 0 1 and > 0. The term in the latter model is a measure of the amount of soil nutrient the crop absorbs from a slowly available pool of nutrients not accounted for in the amounts extracted by the soil test procedure employed or applied through fertilizer.The field verification of these models is reported elsewhere. 相似文献
18.