Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary stenting reduces the rate of restenosis after angioplasty in patients with new coronary lesions. We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to determine whether intracoronary stenting, as compared with standard balloon angioplasty, reduces the recurrence of luminal narrowing in restenotic lesions. METHODS: A total of 383 patients who had undergone at least one balloon angioplasty and who had clinical and angiographic evidence of restenosis after the procedure were randomly assigned to undergo standard balloon angioplasty (192 patients) or intracoronary stenting with a Palmaz-Schatz stent (191 patients). The primary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis (defined as stenosis of more than 50 percent of the luminal diameter) at six months. The secondary end points were death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, and revascularization of the target vessel. RESULTS: The rate of restenosis was significantly higher in the angioplasty group than in the stent group (32 percent as compared with 18 percent, P= 0.03). Revascularization of the target vessel at six months was required in 27 percent of the angioplasty group but in only 10 percent of the stent group (P=0.001). This difference resulted from a smaller mean (+/-SD) minimal luminal diameter in the angioplasty group (1.85+/-0.56 mm) than in the stent group (2.04+/-0.66 mm), with a mean difference of 0.19 mm (P=0.01) at follow-up. Subacute thrombosis occurred in 0.6 percent of the angioplasty group and in 3.9 percent of the stent group. The rate of event-free survival at 250 days was 72 percent in the angioplasty group and 84 percent in the stent group (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Elective coronary stenting was effective in the treatment of restenosis after balloon angioplasty. Stenting resulted in a lower rate of recurrent stenosis despite a higher incidence of subacute thrombosis.     

Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS): immediate and long-term follow-up results

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare two strategies of revascularization in patients obtaining a good immediate angiographic result after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): elective stenting versus optimal PTCA. A good immediate angiographic result with provisional stenting was considered to occur only if early loss in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was documented at 30 min post-PTCA angiography. BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting reduces restenosis in lesions exhibiting early deterioration (>0.3 mm) in MLD within the first 24 hours (early loss) after successful PTCA. Lesions with no early loss after PTCA have a low restenosis rate. METHODS: To compare angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) of lesions treated with coronary stenting versus those treated with optimal PTCA, 116 patients were randomized to stent (n=57) or to optimal PTCA (n=59). After randomization in the PTCA group, 13.5% of the patients crossed over to stent due to early loss (provisional stenting). RESULTS: Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. At 7.6 months, 96.6% of the entire population had a follow-up angiographic study: 98.2% in the stent and 94.9% in the PTCA group. Immediate and follow-up angiographic data showed that acute gain was significantly higher in the stent than in the PTCA group (1.95 vs. 1.5 mm; p < 0.03). However, late loss was significantly higher in the stent than the PTCA group (0.63+/-0.59 vs. 0.26+/-0.44, respectively; p=0.01). Hence, net gain with both techniques was similar (1.32< or =0.3 vs. 1.24+/-0.29 mm for the stent and the PTCA groups, respectively; p=NS). Angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up (19.2% in stent vs. 16.4% in PTCA; p=NS) and TVR (17.5% in stent vs. 13.5% in PTCA; p=NS) were similar. Furthermore, event-free survival was 80.8% in the stent versus 83.1% in the PTCA group (p=NS). Overall costs (hospital and follow-up) were US $591,740 in the stent versus US $398,480 in the PTCA group (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of PTCA with delay angiogram and provisional stent if early loss occurs had similar restenosis rate and TVR, but lower cost than primary stenting after PTCA.     

The relation between multiple sleep latency test findings and the frequency of apneic events in REM and non-REM sleep

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. BACKGROUND: Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear. METHODS: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate. RESULTS: Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (> or =10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16+/-7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98+/-0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10+/-3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19+/-0.60 mm vs. 1.75+/-0.68 mm (p=0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p=0.046. CONCLUSIONS: Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions.     

Are directional coronary atherectomy and Palmaz-Schatz stent more efficacious than conventional balloon angioplasty for treating de novo coronary artery lesions?

It is unclear whether new devices such as directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) or Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation improve long-term outcomes compared with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with stable angina and de novo coronary artery lesions of type A or type B except for complete occlusive lesions investigated by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A total of 146 patients with stable angina and simple lesions were assigned to either conventional balloon angioplasty (62 patients), DCA (50 patients), or Palmaz-Schatz implantation (34 patients). The acute results and late outcomes were assessed by coronary angiography. The results of the three procedures were similar with respect to procedural success and complications. Patients who underwent stenting or DCA had a larger immediate increase in the diameter of the lumen and a larger luminal diameter immediately after the procedure than those who underwent balloon angioplasty. At six months follow-up, the patients treated by stenting continued to have a larger luminal diameter and a lower rate of restenosis than those treated with balloon angioplasty (2.30 +/- 0.66 vs 1.85 +/- 0.83 mm, p < 0.005; 5.9% vs 29%, p < 0.05) and DCA (2.30 +/- 0.66 vs 1.90 +/- 0.96 mm, p < 0.05; 5.9% vs 24%, NS). The patients treated with balloon angioplasty had a smaller late loss than those treated with DCA or Palmaz-Schatz stent. The patients treated with DCA had a larger loss index than those treated with balloon angioplasty or Palmaz-Schatz stent. Stenting was a significant factor in decreasing the rate of restenosis by logistic regression analysis, compared with balloon angioplasty. The angiographic outcomes were better in patients who received a stent than in those who received other treatments. This study suggests that even lesions stable for treatment by balloon angioplasty and DCA can also be treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents.     

Comparison of primary coronary stenting to primary balloon angioplasty with stent bailout for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction

This study compares the immediate and long-term outcomes of a primary coronary stenting strategy with primary balloon angioplasty with stent bailout in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). One hundred forty-seven consecutive patients who underwent primary balloon angioplasty with stent bailout (n = 94) or primary stenting (n = 53) for AMI were clinically followed for 8.1 +/- 5.7 and 8.5 +/- 4.5 months, respectively. Immediate results, as well as in-hospital and long-term ischemic events (death, reinfarction, and repeat revascularization) were compared between both groups. Angiographic success was 91.5% in the balloon angioplasty group and 94% in the stent group. In-hospital and late follow-up combined ischemic events were 22 of 94 (23%) versus 0 of 53 (0%); p < 0.001 and 33 of 78 (42%) versus 13 of 53 (25%), p = 0.04 for the balloon angioplasty and stent groups, respectively. At 6 months, the cumulative probability of repeat target lesion revascularization was higher in the balloon angioplasty group (47% vs 18%, p = 0.0006) as was the probability of late target revascularization (36% vs 18%, p = 0.046); the cumulative event-free survival after 6 months was significantly lower in the balloon angioplasty group (44% vs 80%, p = 0.0001). This study demonstrates that a primary stent placement strategy in patients with AMI is safe, feasible, and superior to primary balloon angioplasty with stent bailout. Primary stenting results in a larger postprocedural minimal luminal diameter, a lower early and late recurrent ischemic event rate, and a lower incidence of target lesion revascularization at follow-up.     

Primary stenting of de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: a prospective, pilot study

Technical advancement and new anti-thrombotic regimens have recently shown so much improvement in the results of coronary stenting that the conventional contra-indication for stenting in small coronary arteries (<3 mm) needs to be revised. We undertook a prospective pilot study of elective Palmaz-Schatz stenting in de novo lesions located in coronary arteries of less than 3 mm diameter. Fifty consecutive patients (63 +/- 9 years) with stable (n = 38) and unstable angina (n = 12) were included. Philips-DCI quantitative coronary analysis was used to measure reference diameter, minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis before PTCA, after stenting and at 6-month angiographic follow-up study. All measurements were performed after intracoronary injection of nitroglycerin (300 microg). All patients received ticlopidine (250 mg/day) and aspirin (100 mg/day). The mean lesion length was 9 +/- 3 mm. The balloon size used for stent delivery was 2.75 mm in 30 patients and 2.5 mm in 20 patients and the mean balloon inflation pressure used for stent deployment was 12 +/- 2 atm. All stents were deployed successfully. In-hospital complications occurred in two patients, diagonal branch occlusion at day 2 requiring emergency PTCA in one and a hematoma at the femoral puncture site requiring surgery in the other. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate remained 2% (nonfatal infarct in one). Follow-up angiography (n = 46, 92%) at 6 +/- 3 months showed a 30% restenosis rate. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate was 13%. We conclude that elective stenting in small coronary arteries is feasible and involves an acceptable risk of restenosis.     

Immobilization of domestic goats (Capra hircus) using orally administered carfentanil citrate and detomidine hydrochloride

A total of 147 stents were implanted (in overlapping manner in 76% of vessels) in a single coronary artery in 59 patients (60 vessels, 97 lesions, 2.45 stents/vessel) over a period of 18 mo using high pressure stent deployment without ultrasound guidance. The indications for stenting were suboptimal percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) result (45%), primary prevention of restenosis (44%), acute closure (10%), and restenosis after plain balloon angioplasty (1%). One patient required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (extensive dissection), and one required early intervention with plain balloon angioplasty and intracoronary urokinase for stent thrombosis. There were no deaths. Thirteen patients had recurrence of angina within 6 mo and angiograms were performed in all. These showed intrastent restenosis in nine (all had successful repeat plain balloon angioplasty), development of new disease in other vessels along with restenosis close to the stent in the target vessel in one (underwent elective CABG) and normal angiograms with widely patent stents in three. Forty-five patients (77%) remained free of recurrent angina and 25 of these had follow-up angiograms (56%) at a mean of 172 days, two showing restenosis. Thus, the restenosis rate per patient in the symptomatic group (angiographic follow-up in 100%) was 77% and in the asymptomatic group (angiographic follow-up in 56%) was 8%. The restenosis rate in the subgroup with bailout stenting (n = 6) was 20% (angiographic follow-up in 83%). The overall restenosis rate per patient was 32% (overall angiographic follow-up in 66%). During the 6-mo follow-up period, one patient underwent elective CABG (1.7%), one sustained a non-Q myocardial infarction (1.7%), nine had repeat PTCA to the target vessel (15.5%), and there were no deaths. The event-free survival rate was 77%. Multiple stent implantation aided by high pressure stent deployment without ultrasound guidance and with adjunctive optimal antiplatelet therapy without oral anticoagulation seems to be a useful and effective revascularisation strategy to deal with long lesions and acute dissections with a high procedural success rate. The restenosis rate is acceptable and is not appreciably high as reported in previous studies from the "warfarin era."     

Cytochrome P450 2E1 mRNA in the rat prostate: detection and quantitation by competitive reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction

Conventional balloon angioplasty treatment of aorto-ostial stenoses in native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts is associated with a low primary success rate, a high complication rate and a high incidence of restenosis. The short-term outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in aorto-ostial lesions was compared with that of balloon angioplasty. Thirteen patients underwent stent implantation for 13 de novo lesions (four in the left main coronary trunk, two in the right coronary artery, seven in the vein graft) between January 1994 and December 1995. Fourteen patients underwent balloon angioplasty for 14 de novo lesions (five in the left main coronary trunk, four in the right coronary artery, five in the vein graft between January 1986 and April 1992. Both groups had similar clinical characteristics. Initial success was obtained in all patients in the stent group, compared with 71% of the balloon angioplasty group. Insufficient dilation was the main cause for such failure in the balloon angioplasty group. Baseline reference diameters were similar (3.40 +/- 0.65 mm in the stent group vs 3.36 +/- 0.42 mm in the balloon angioplasty group) and there was no difference in baseline minimal luminal diameter (1.41 +/- 0.74 vs 1.08 +/- 0.56 mm). Minimal luminal diameter was significantly greater in the stent group than in the balloon angioplasty group at both post-procedure and follow-up examinations (post: 3.36 +/- 0.58 vs 2.69 +/- 0.45 mm, p < 0.01; follow-up: 2.33 +/- 0.96 vs 1.52 +/- 0.68 mm, p < 0.05). There was no subacute occlusion in either group. The overall angiographic restenosis rate (> 50% stenosis) was lower in the stent group (17%) than in the balloon angioplasty group: the restenosis rates of native lesions were 0% in the stent group and 40% in the balloon angioplasty group; those of saphenous vein graft lesions were 33% in the stent group and 50% in the balloon angioplasty group. Although the number of patients was limited, these results suggest that Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation may be a safe and effective strategy for treating aorto-ostial lesions in both native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts.     

Humoral nitric oxide levels and antibody immune response of symptomatic and indeterminate Chagas'' disease patients to commercial and autochthonous Trypanosoma cruzi antigen

Coronary balloon angioplasty is associated with a high incidence of restenosis in diabetics and of revascularisation of the culprit lesion and increased long-term mortality. The authors report the short and medium-term results of coronary stenting in diabetics. Between May 1995 and April 1997, 2,182 patients underwent coronary stenting. This population included 272 diabetics : 58 insulin-dependent and 214 non-insulin dependent (oral antidiabetics). Stents were implanted in vessels with mean diameters of 3 mm and over. During the hospital period, the complication rate (mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, emergency coronary bypass surgery, subacute thrombosis of the stent) was comparable in non-diabetics, insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetics (2.55, 0 and 2.0% respectively). One patient (0.5%) died and another (0.5%) had non-fatal myocardial infarction (thrombosis of the stent) in the non-insulin-dependent group. No complications were observed in the insulin-dependent diabetic group. The mean clinical follow-up of 13 months (3-26 months) was respected in 93 and 97% of diabetics. The non-fatal myocardial infarction rate and revascularisation of the culprit lesion were comparable in the insulin and non-insulin-dependent groups (0 versus 0.5% and 8.2 versus 10.5% respectively) but global mortality was higher in the insulin-dependent diabetics (9.3 versus 2.4%).     

Immediate and long-term effect of balloon angioplasty or stent implantation on the absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the immediate and long-term effects of PTCA on the coronary flow reserve. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 54 patients with 1-vessel disease and normal left ventricular function were studied after balloon angioplasty (n=34) or stent implantation (n=20). Distal coronary blood flow velocity reserve (CFR) was defined as the ratio of adenosine-induced hyperemic versus baseline blood flow velocity with a 0.014-in Doppler guidewire. The relative CFR was defined as the ratio of the distal CFR and the reference CFR measured in the normal adjacent coronary artery. Hemodynamic and angiographic measurements were performed before and directly after balloon angioplasty or stent implantation and at 6-month follow-up. CFR after PTCA 相似文献   

Evaluating the potential cost-effectiveness of stenting as a treatment for symptomatic single-vessel coronary disease. Use of a decision-analytic model

BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting appears to provide more predictable immediate results and lower rates of restenosis than conventional balloon angioplasty for selected lesion types, but its hospital costs are significantly higher. This study was designed to evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stenting relative to conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of patients with symptomatic, single-vessel coronary disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a decision-analytic model to predict quality-adjusted life expectancy and lifetime treatment costs for patients with symptomatic, single-vessel coronary disease treated by either Palmaz-Schatz stenting (PSS) or conventional angioplasty (PTCA). Estimates of the probabilities of overall procedural success (PTCA, 97%; PSS, 98%), abrupt closure requiring emergency bypass surgery (PTCA, 1.0%; PSS, 0.6%), and angiographic restenosis (PTCA, 37%; PSS, 20%) were derived from review of the literature published as of September 1993. Procedural costs were based on the true economic (ie, variable) costs of each procedure at Boston's Beth Israel Hospital. On the basis of these data, coronary stenting was estimated to result in a higher quality-adjusted life expectancy than conventional angioplasty but to incur additional costs as well. Compared with conventional angioplasty, stenting had an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $23,600 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Although the cost-effectiveness ratio for stenting changed with variations in assumptions about the relative costs and restenosis rates, it remained less than $40,000 per quality-adjusted year of life gained--and thus was similar to many other accepted medical treatments--unless the stent angiographic restenosis rate was > 23%, the angioplasty restenosis rate was < 34%, or the cost of stenting (including vascular complications) exceeded that of conventional angioplasty by more than $3000. The alternative strategy of secondary stenting (initial angioplasty followed by stenting only for symptomatic restenosis) was estimated to be both less effective and less cost-effective than primary stenting over a wide range of plausible assumptions and thus does not appear to be cost-effective when primary stenting is also an option. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-analytic modeling can be used to evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of new coronary interventions. Our analysis suggests that despite its higher cost, elective coronary stenting may be a reasonably cost-effective treatment for selected patients with single-vessel coronary disease. Primary stenting is unlikely to be cost-effective for lesions with a low probability of restenosis (eg, < 30%) or for patients for whom the cost of stenting is expected to be much higher than usual (eg, because of a high risk of vascular complications). Given the sensitivity of the cost-effectiveness ratios to even modest variations in the relative restenosis rates and cost estimates, future studies will be necessary to determine more precisely the cost-effectiveness of coronary stenting for specific patient and lesion subsets.     

Six-month clinical and angiographic outcome of the new, less shortening Wallstent in native coronary arteries

BACKGROUND: The new, less shortening, self-expanding Wallstent is characterized by longitudinal flexibility, a protective membrane, a low profile, and a customized range of diameters (3.5 to 6.0 mm). The recent modification of the braiding angle of the Wallstent has resulted in a new device with less shortening on expansion and a concomitant reduction in radial force. We hypothesized that the enforced mechanical remodeling produced by the selection of an oversized Wallstent might result in improved accommodation of subsequent reactive intimal hyperplasia and prevention of chronic recoil of the vessel. METHODS AND RESULTS: To prove this hypothesis, we recently implanted 44 new, less shortening Wallstents in 35 native coronary arteries in 35 patients with acute or threatened closure after balloon angioplasty, according to a strategy of oversizing of Wallstent diameter and complete coverage of the lesion length. The initial and 6-month follow-up angiograms were analyzed with a computer-based quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) system. Acute gain (minimal luminal diameter [MLD] post minus MLD pre) and late loss (MLD post minus MLD at follow-up) were examined. Stent deployment was successful in 44 of 44 attempts (100%). Nominal stent diameter used was 1.40 mm larger than the maximal vessel diameter. One patient (3%) with a dilated but unstented lesion proximal to the stented segment sustained a subacute occlusion on day 1 associated with myocardial infarction. Event-free survival at 30 days after stent implantation was 97% (34 of 35 patients). Of the 34 patients eligible for 6-month angiographic follow-up, 3 who were asymptomatic declined repeat angiography. MLD (and percent diameter stenosis [% DS]) changed from 0.83 +/- 0.50 mm (72%) pre through 3.06 +/- 0.48 mm (15%) post to 2.27 +/- 0.74 mm (28%) at follow-up. Acute gain was 2.23 +/- 0.63 mm, and late loss was 0.78 +/- 0.61 mm. Angiographic restenosis ( > 50% DS) was observed in 5 of 31 patients (16%) at 6 months, all of whom underwent repeat angioplasty. Thus, the overall event-free survival at 6-month follow-up was 83% (29 of 35 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The oversized Wallstent implantation with complete coverage of the lesion length conveyed a favorable 6-month clinical and angiographic outcome. The large acute gain obtained by the Wallstent afforded greater accommodation of the subsequent late loss. The enforced mechanical remodeling by oversized new Wallstents may result in prevention of acute and chronic recoil of the vessel wall and subsequently a lower restenosis rate at follow-up.     

Differences in restenosis propensity of devices for transluminal coronary intervention. A quantitative angiographic comparison of balloon angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stent implantation and excimer laser angioplasty. CARPORT, MERCATOR, MARCATOR, PARK, and BENESTENT Trial Groups

With the increasing clinical application of new devices for percutaneous coronary revascularization, maximization of the acute angiographic result has become widely recognized as a key factor in maintained clinical and angiographic success. What is unclear, however, is whether the specific mode of action of different devices might exert an additional independent effect on late luminal renarrowing. The purpose of this study was to investigate such a difference in the degree of provocation of luminal renarrowing (or 'restenosis propensity') by different devices, among 3660 patients, who had 4342 lesions successfully treated by balloon angioplasty (n = 3797), directional coronary atherectomy (n = 200), Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation (n = 229) or excimer laser coronary angioplasty (n = 116) and who also underwent quantitative angiographic analysis pre- and post-intervention and at 6-month follow-up. To allow valid comparisons between the groups, because of significant differences in coronary vessel size (balloon angioplasty = 2.62 +/- 0.55 mm, directional coronary atherectomy = 3.28 +/- 0.62 mm, excimer laser coronary angioplasty = 2.51 +/- 0.47 mm, Palmaz-Schatz = 3.01 +/- 0.44 mm; P < 0.0001), the comparative measurements of interest selected were the 'relative loss' in luminal diameter (RLoss = loss/vessel size) to denote the restenosis process, and the 'relative lumen at follow-up' (RLfup = minimal luminal diameter at follow up/vessel size) to represent the angiographic outcome. For consistency, lesion severity pre-intervention was represented by the 'relative lumen pre' (RLpre = minimal luminal diameter pre/vessel size) and the luminal increase at intervention was measured as 'relative gain' (relative gain = gain/ vessel size). Differences in restenosis propensity between devices was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Multivariate models were constructed to determine relative loss and relative lumen at follow-up, taking account of relative lumen pre-intervention, lesion location, relative gain, vessel size and the device used. In addition, model-estimated relative loss and relative lumen at follow-up at given relative lumen pre-intervention relative gain and vessel size, were compared among the four groups. Significant differences were detected among the groups both with respect to these estimates, as well as in the degree of influence of progressively increasing relative gain, on the extent of renarrowing (relative loss) and angiographic outcome (relative lumen at follow-up), particularly at higher levels of luminal increase (relative gain). Specifically, lesions treated by balloon angioplasty or Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation (the predominantly 'dilating' interventions) were associated with more favourable angiographic profiles than directional atherectomy or excimer laser (the mainly 'debulking' interventions). Significant effects of lesion severity and location, as well as the well known influence of luminal increase on both luminal renarrowing and late angiographic outcome were also noted. These findings indicate that propensity to restenosis after apparently successful intervention is influenced not only by the degree of luminal enlargement achieved at intervention, but by the device used to achieve it. In view of the clinical implications of such findings, further evaluation in larger randomized patient populations is warranted.     

Impact of diabetes mellitus on percutaneous revascularization (CAVEAT-I). CAVEAT-I Investigators. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial

We examined the relation between diabetes mellitus and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I), a randomized trial comparing treatment with either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or directional atherectomy for de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Acute success and complication rates, 6-month angiographic restenosis rates, and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing each procedure. Acute success rates between diabetic (n = 191) and nondiabetic (n = 821) patients were similar for both revascularization techniques. Except for the need for dialysis, complication rates were also similar. Six months after atherectomy, diabetic patients had significantly more angiographic restenosis than nondiabetics (59.7% vs 47.4%) and significantly smaller minimum luminal diameters (1.20 vs 1.40 mm). Diabetics undergoing atherectomy required more frequent bypass surgery (12.8% vs 8.5%) and more repeat percutaneous revascularizations (36.5% vs 28.1%) than nondiabetics undergoing atherectomy. Restenosis rates, minimum luminal diameters and repeat revascularizations between diabetics and nondiabetics undergoing angioplasty were similar. The higher restenosis and repeat revascularization rates and the smaller minimum luminal diameter at follow-up in diabetic patients suggest that atherectomy may provide only modest benefit for these patients. The increased restenosis rate in diabetics undergoing atherectomy (but not angioplasty) requires further evaluation.     

Excimer laser angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty in functional and total coronary occlusions

Registries of excimer laser coronary angioplasty have reported good results in the treatment of complex coronary artery disease, including total or subtotal coronary occlusions. One hundred three patients (103 lesions) with a functional or total coronary occlusion were included in a randomized trial (Amsterdam-Rotterdam [AMRO] trial, total of 308 patients), 49 patients were allocated to laser angioplasty and 54 patients to balloon angioplasty. The primary clinical end points were death, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, or repeated coronary angioplasty of the randomized segment during a 6-month follow-up period. The primary angiographic end point was the minimal lumen diameter at follow-up in relation to the baseline value (net gain), as determined by an automated contour-detection algorithm. Laser angioplasty was followed by balloon angioplasty in all procedures. The angiographic success rate was 65% in patients treated with excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty compared with 61% in patients treated with balloon angioplasty alone. No deaths occurred. There were no significant differences between the laser angioplasty group and the balloon angioplasty group in the incidence of myocardial infarctions (1 patient vs 3, respectively, p = 0.36), coronary bypass surgery (4 patients vs 2, respectively, p = 0.34), repeat angioplasty (10 patients vs 8, respectively, p = 0.46) or primary clinical end point (15 patients vs 12, respectively, p = 0.34). The net gain in minimal lumen diameter and restenosis rate (>50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) were 0.81 +/- 0.74 mm and 66.7%, respectively, in patients treated with laser angioplasty compared with 1.04 +/- 0.68 mm and 48.5%, respectively, in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (p = 0.59 and p = 0.15, respectively). Excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty demonstrated no benefit over balloon angioplasty with respect to initial and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in the treatment of patients with functional or total coronary occlusions of >10 mm in length.     

The feasibility of intracarotid adenosine for the manipulation of human cerebrovascular resistance

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting (CS) in a consecutive series of patients. BACKGROUND: Although stenting in highly selected patient groups reduces restenosis, the results of stenting in a heterogeneous patient group and the effects of clinical and procedural factors on stent restenosis are currently unclear. METHODS: We analyzed the 6-month angiographic outcome of 500 lesions in 463 consecutive patients undergoing successful CS. Clinical, qualitative and quantitative angiographic variables were correlated with restenosis assessed as both a binary and a continuous variable. RESULTS: Restenosis, defined as the presence of >50% diameter stenosis in the dilated segment, was present in 105 (26%) of the 405 lesions with angiographic follow-up. The mean late lumen loss during the follow-up period was 0.79+/-0.64 mm. Implantation of multiple stents (p < 0.0001) and a high acute gain (p < 0.0002) were independently associated with a higher late lumen loss. In contrast, the use of high inflation pressure (p < 0.02) and Palmaz-Schatz stents (p < 0.005) was independently associated with a lower late lumen loss. When restenosis was defined as a qualitative variable, implantation of multiple stents (p < 0.001), stenosis length (p < 0.01), small reference diameter (p < 0.02) and stent type other than Palmaz-Schatz (p < 0.01) were independent predictors of restenosis. None of the clinical variables tested was associated with restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stenting in an unselected patient group is associated with an acceptable restenosis rate. Although some risk factors were identified, the risk of restenosis was not related to most of the variables tested. This suggests that the superiority of CS over balloon angioplasty, in terms of restenosis, might also apply to subgroups of patients that were not included in the recent randomized studies.     

Short- and long-term clinical and quantitative angiographic results with the new, less shortening Wallstent for vessel reconstruction in chronic total occlusion: a quantitative angiographic study

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine whether oversized implantation of the new, less shortening Wallstent provides a more favorable long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in chronic total occlusions than does conventional coronary balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Restenosis and reocclusion remain major limitations of balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions. Enforced mechanical remodeling by implantation of the oversized Wallstent may prevent elastic recoil and improve accommodation of intimal hyperplasia. METHODS: Lumen dimension was measured by a computer-based quantitative coronary angiography system (CAAS II). These measurements (before and after intervention and at 6-month follow-up) were compared between the groups with Wallstent implantation (20 lesions, 20 patients) and conventional balloon angioplasty (266 lesions, 249 patients) for treatment of chronic total occlusion. Acute gain (minimal lumen diameter after intervention minus that before intervention), late loss (minimal lumen diameter after intervention minus that at follow-up) and net gain (acute gain minus late loss) were examined. RESULTS: Wallstent deployment was successful in all patients. High pressure intra-Wallstent balloon inflation (mean +/- SD 14 +/- 3 atm) was performed in all lesions. Although vessel size did not differ between the Wallstent and balloon angioplasty groups, acute gain was significantly greater in the Wallstent group (2.96 +/- 0.55 vs. 1.61 +/- 0.34 mm, p < 0.0001). Although late loss was also significantly larger in the Wallstent group (0.81 +/- 0.95 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.68 mm, p < 0.05), net gain was still significantly greater in this group (2.27 +/- 1.00 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.69 mm, p < 0.0001). Angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) occurred at 6 months in 29% of lesions in the Wallstent group and in 45% of those in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.5150). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the oversized Wallstent, with full coverage of the lesion length, ensures resetting of the vessel size to its original caliber before disease and allows greater accommodation of intimal hyperplasia and chronic vessel recoil. Wallstent implantation provides a more favorable short- and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome than does conventional balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions.     

Effect of nadroparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, on clinical and angiographic restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: the FACT study. Fraxiparine Angioplastie Coronaire Transluminale

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies suggest that the antiproliferative effect of heparin after arterial injury is maximized by pretreatment. No previous studies of restenosis have used a pretreatment strategy. We designed this study to determine whether treatment with nadroparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, started 3 days before the procedure and continued for 3 months, affected angiographic restenosis or clinical outcome after coronary angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, elective coronary angioplasty was performed on 354 patients who were treated with daily subcutaneous nadroparin (0.6 mL of 10,250 anti-Xa IU/mL) or placebo injections started 3 days before angioplasty and continued for 3 months. Angiography was performed just before and immediately after angioplasty and at follow-up. The primary study end point was angiographic restenosis, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography 3 months after balloon angioplasty. Clinical follow-up was continued up to 6 months. Clinical and procedural variables and the occurrence of periprocedural complications did not differ between groups. At angiographic follow-up, the mean minimal lumen diameter and the mean residual stenosis in the nadroparin group (1.37+/-0.66 mm, 51.9+/-21.0%) did not differ from the corresponding values in the control group (1.48+/-0.59 mm, 48.8+/-18.9%). Combined major cardiac-related clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization) did not differ between groups (30.3% versus 29.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin nadroparin continued for 3 months after balloon angioplasty had no beneficial effect on angiographic restenosis or on adverse clinical outcomes.     

Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II)

BACKGROUND: The multicentre, randomised Benestent-II study investigated a strategy of implantation of a heparin-coated Palmar-Schatz stent plus antiplatelet drugs compared with the use of balloon angioplasty in selected patients with stable or stabilised unstable angina, with one or more de-novo lesions, less than 18 mm long, in vessels of diameter 3 mm or more. METHODS: 827 patients were randomly assigned stent implantation (414 patients) or standard balloon angioplasty (413 patients). The primary clinical endpoint was event-free survival at 6 months, including death, myocardial infarction, and the need for revascularisation. The secondary endpoints were the restenosis rate at 6 months and the cost-effectiveness at 12 months. There was also one-to-one subrandomisation to either clinical and angiographic follow-up or clinical follow-up alone. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Four patients (one stent group, three angioplasty group) were excluded from analysis since no lesion was found. At 6 months, a primary clinical endpoint had occurred in 53 (12.8%) of 413 patients in the stent group and 79 (19.3%) of 410 in the angioplasty group (p=0.013). This significant difference in clinical outcome was maintained at 12 months. In the subgroup assigned angiographic follow-up, the mean minimum lumen diameter was greater in the stent group than in the balloon-angioplasty group, (1.89 [SD 0.65] vs 1.66 [0.57] mm, p=0.0002), which corresponds to restenosis rates (diameter stenosis > or =50%) of 16% and 31% (p=0.0008). In the group assigned clinical follow-up alone, event-free survival rate at 12 months was higher in the stent group than the balloon-angioplasty group (0.89 vs 0.79, p=0.004) at a cost of an additional 2085 Dutch guilders (US$1020) per patient. INTERPRETATION: Over 12-month follow-up, a strategy of elective stenting with heparin-coated stents is more effective but also more costly than balloon angioplasty.     

Coronary artery restenosis after balloon angioplasty in humans is associated with circumferential coronary constriction

Therapies that inhibit intimal hyperplasia do not prevent restenosis after coronary artery balloon angioplasty, suggesting that additional mechanisms may be responsible for restenosis in humans. Using an intravascular ultrasound (Hewlett-Packard Sonos Intravascular Imaging System). 3.5F, 30-MHz (Boston Scientific) monorail imaging catheter, we studied 17 patients with clinical and angiographic restenosis at an average (mean +/- SD) of 7 +/- 6 months after balloon angioplasty (13 men age, 71 +/- 10 years; 12 left anterior descending coronary arteries, 4 right coronary arteries, and 1 left circumflex coronary artery) The lumen area (L.A), vessel wall area (VWA), and total cross-sectional area (CSA) within the external elastic lamina were measured at the restenosis site and at proximal and distal reference sites, which were defined as adjacent segments with the least amount of plaque. Consistent with coronary angiography findings, decreased LA at the restenotic site was detected in all 17 patients. The unique finding was that total CSA at the restenotic site was significantly decreased compared with both proximal and distal reference sites (10.1 +/- 2.4 versus 14.8 +/- 3.2 mm2 and 10.1 +/- 2.4 versus 13.8 +/- 3.1 mm2, respectively, P < .001), whereas VWA (intima plus media) was slightly increased at the angioplasty site compared with both proximal and distal reference sites (8.0 +/- 2.3 versus 7.6 +/- 2.3 mm2 and 8.0 +/- 2.3 versus 6.7 +/- 2.3 mm2, respectively, P = NS). Eighty-three percent of the loss in LA at the restenotic site was due to constriction of the total CSA, while the increase in VWA at the restenotic site accounted for only a 17% loss in LA. We then compared these results with the morphology of coronary artery segments in 14 patients without restenosis. These coronary artery segments had been previously treated with balloon angioplasty (7 +/- 5 months). Unlike that in restenotic lesions, the total CSA within the external elastic lamina at the sites of previous angioplasty was similar to that in distal and proximal reference sites (P = NS). Significant and consistent reduction in arterial CSA, with a minor increase in VWA, characterizes human coronary lesions that cause angiographic restenosis. These data suggest that in humans, "recoil" and/or vascular contraction with healing in response to balloon injury is a major contributor to restenosis after balloon angioplasty.