Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer: revisiting the issues

OBJECTIVE: To assess current ideas about the benefits and risks of estrogen and hormone replacement therapy (ERT/HRT) in postmenopausal women. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE searches, supplemented by various texts, of the literature on HRT, ERT, and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): tamoxifen, toremifene, and raloxifene. DATA SYNTHESIS: HRT is primarily used for improving quality of life in women suffering from vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. HRT is beneficial in postmenopausal women for preventing cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of meta-analyses of clinical trials showed that ERT/HRT ever-users (patients who have ever used ERT/HRT) did not have an increased risk of breast cancer, but current users did have an increased risk, with some studies reporting increasing risk with duration of ERT. No relationship was found between dose or the addition of progestin to ERT and increased breast cancer risk. Overall breast cancer mortality rates associated with HRT were decreased in current users. In general, HRT does not increase the risk of breast cancer in women with a family history of the disease, compared with those without a family history. New HRT strategies that could potentially prevent breast cancer are now being developed. The SERMs tamoxifen and toremifene appear to have positive clinical effects on bone and serum lipids; they are currently being investigated for use as breast cancer chemopreventive agents. Raloxifene, a new SERM used for the prevention of osteoporosis, is an alternative for women who cannot tolerate HRT. Unfortunately, these SERMS have anti-estrogenic effects and thus cause vasomotor adverse effects such as hot flashes and vaginal dryness. In addition, SERMs do not protect against heart disease or prevent osteoporosis as well as does HRT. CONCLUSION: Presently, SERMs will not become first-line HRT, as the positive effects of ERT/HRT may outweigh any potentially increased risk of breast cancer. The development of new agents with pharmacodynamic profiles similar to that of ERT/HRT but lacking its adverse effects would be greatly beneficial for postmenopausal women.     

Hormone replacement therapy in women with breast cancer. Do the risks outweigh the benefits?

PURPOSE: To review critically the literature regarding effects of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT)/combined estrogen and progesterone replacement therapy (HRT) on the risk of breast cancer and on other health risks and benefits in postmenopausal women, with a focus on risks and benefits in women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer. METHOD: A literature search was conducted using Medline, Cancerline, and the bibliographies of reports published as of March 1995. All five published meta-analyses that examined the risk of breast cancer in relation to ERT/HRT in otherwise healthy women were critically reviewed. All known reports of women with a history of breast cancer given ERT/HRT subsequent to diagnosis and additional reports regarding the benefits of ERT/HRT were also reviewed. RESULTS: None of the five meta-analyses demonstrated a significantly increased risk of developing breast cancer in ever users compared with never users of ERT/HRT. Current use may be associated with a small increased risk. This increased risk should be balanced by the expected benefits of ERT/HRT on quality of life, bone metabolism, and cardiovascular function. Preliminary information does not suggest a major detrimental effect of ERT/HRT in women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer, but these reports include few women with limited follow-up data. There are no randomized trials in women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer. CONCLUSION: In healthy postmenopausal women, the benefits associated with ERT/HRT outweigh the risks. In women with a previous diagnosis of breast cancer, the balance of risks and benefits should be explored in randomized controlled trials.     

The role of hormone replacement therapy in the risk for breast cancer and total mortality in women with a family history of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are of considerable interest and importance, especially in terms of whether they differ among subsets of women. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether HRT is associated with increased risks for breast cancer and total mortality in women with a family history of breast cancer. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Population-based sample of midwestern post-menopausal women enrolled in an observational study of risk factors for cancer. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 41,837 female Iowa residents 55 to 69 years of age. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence rates of and relative risks for breast cancer (n = 1085) and total mortality (n = 2035) through 8 years of follow-up were calculated by using data from the State Health Registry of Iowa and the National Death Index. RESULTS: A family history of breast cancer was reported by 12.2% of the cohort at risk. Among women with a family history of breast cancer, those who currently used HRT and had done so for at least 5 years developed breast cancer at an age-adjusted annual rate of 61 cases per 10,000 person-years (95% CI, 28 to 94 cases); this rate was not statistically significantly higher than the rate in women who had never used HRT (46 cases per 10,000 person-years [CI, 36 to 55 cases]). Among women with a family history, those who used HRT had a significantly lower risk for total mortality than did women who had never used HRT (relative risk, 0.67 [CI, 0.51 to 0.89]), including total cancer-related mortality (relative risk, 0.75 [CI, 0.50 to 1.12]). The age-adjusted annual mortality rate for women using HRT for at least 5 years was 46 deaths per 10,000 person-years (CI, 19 to 74 deaths); this is roughly half the rate seen in women who had never used HRT (80 deaths per 10,000 person-years [CI, 69 to 92 deaths]). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that HRT use in women with a family history of breast cancer is not associated with a significantly increased incidence of breast cancer but is associated with a significantly reduced total mortality rate.     

The effects of tamoxifen treatment on the endometrium

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between tamoxifen and endometrial cancer. BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen is a nonsteroidal antiestrogenic drug that has been used successfully for 15 years in the treatment of all stages of breast carcinoma. In light of the positive results, several studies are now being conducted to test prolonged tamoxifen treatment as a prophylaxis against breast cancer in high-risk women. Although tamoxifen was thought to have only a few side effects, reports indicate that it is associated with an increased incidence of proliferative and neoplastic changes in the endometrium. As the current trend is to administer tamoxifen for prolonged periods and for more indications, the detrimental effects on the endometrium have vast implications. METHODS: Review of the current literature. RESULTS: Tamoxifen treatment is associated with an increased incidence of proliferative and neoplastic changes in the endometrium, with a 1.3 to 7.5 relative risk of developing endometrial carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The results of tamoxifen treatment in breast carcinoma override the risk of developing endometrial carcinoma. Any vaginal bleeding in women treated with tamoxifen should be investigated carefully and promptly. In the future it may be necessary to advise these women to undergo routine uterine cavity examination.     

Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk

PURPOSE: Previous studies of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have used detection methods that may underestimate the actual frequency of mutations and have analyzed women using heterogeneous criteria for risk of hereditary cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 238 women with breast cancer before age 50 or ovarian cancer at any age and at least one first- or second-degree relative with either diagnosis underwent sequence analysis of BRCA1 followed by analysis of BRCA2 (except for 27 women who declined analysis of BRCA2 after a deleterious mutation was discovered in BRCA1). Results were correlated with personal and family history of malignancy. RESULTS: Deleterious mutations were identified in 94 (39%) women, including 59 of 117 (50%) from families with ovarian cancer and 35 of 121 (29%) from families without ovarian cancer. Mutations were identified in 14 of 70 (20%) women with just one other relative who developed breast cancer before age 50. In women with breast cancer, mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were associated with a 10-fold increased risk of subsequent ovarian carcinoma (P = .005). CONCLUSION: Because mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women with breast cancer are associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, analysis of these genes should be considered for women diagnosed with breast cancer who have a high probability of carrying a mutation according to the statistical model developed with these data.     

Effect of smoking on breast cancer in carriers of mutant BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes

BACKGROUND: Smoking has carcinogenic effects, and possibly antiestrogenic effects as well, but it has not been found to be a risk factor for breast cancer in women in the general population. However, hereditary breast cancer is primarily a disease of premenopausal women, and interactions between genes and hormonal and environmental risk factors may be particularly important in this subgroup. METHODS: We conducted a matched case-control study of breast cancer among women who have been identified to be carriers of a deleterious mutation in either the BRCA1 or the BRCA2 gene. These women were assessed for genetic risk at one of several genetic counseling programs for cancer in North America. Information about lifetime smoking history was derived from a questionnaire routinely administered to women who were found to carry a mutation in either gene. Smoking histories of case subjects with breast cancer and age-matched healthy control subjects were compared. Odds ratios for developing breast cancer were determined for smokers versus nonsmokers by use of conditional logistic regression for matched sets after adjustment for other known risk factors. RESULTS: Subjects with BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations and breast cancer were significantly more likely to have been nonsmokers than were subjects with mutations and without breast cancer (two-sided P = .007). In a multivariate analysis, subjects with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who had smoked cigarettes for more than 4 pack-years (i.e., number of packs per day multiplied by the number of years of smoking) were found to have a lower breast cancer risk (odds ratio = 0.46, 95% confidence interval = 0.27-0.80; two-sided P = .006) than subjects with mutations who never smoked. CONCLUSIONS: This study raises the possibility that smoking reduces the risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations.     

Interim analysis of the incidence of breast cancer in the Royal Marsden Hospital tamoxifen randomised chemoprevention trial

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen, a drug with antioestrogenic effects, is predicted to prevent the occurrence of breast cancer. We have undertaken a trial of tamoxifen in healthy women who are at increased risk of breast cancer because of family history. We report a planned interim analysis. METHODS: Between October, 1986, and April, 1996, we accrued 2494 healthy women aged between 30 and 70 with a family history of breast cancer. They have been randomised (double blind) to receive tamoxifen 20 mg per day orally or placebo for up to 8 years. Follow-up included clinical assessment, annual mammography, and assessment of toxicity and compliance. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of breast cancer, which was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis with a survival curve. FINDINGS: With a median follow-up of 70 months, 2471 women (tamoxifen 1238, placebo 1233) were suitable for analysis. The groups were evenly matched at baseline, and compliance was good. The overall frequency of breast cancer is the same for women on tamoxifen or placebo (tamoxifen 34, placebo 36, relative risk 1.06 [95% CI 0.7-1.7], p=0.8). Participants who were already on hormone-replacement therapy when they entered the study had an increased risk of breast cancer compared with non-users. Those participants who started such therapy while on trial had a significantly reduced risk. The safety profile of tamoxifen was as expected. INTERPRETATION: We have been unable to show any effect of tamoxifen on breast-cancer incidence in healthy women, contrary to the report from the NSABP-P1 study showing a 45% reduction in healthy women given tamoxifen versus placebo. Differences in the study populations for the two trials may underlie these conflicting findings: eligibility in our trial was based predominantly on a strong family history of breast cancer whereas in the NSABP trial was mostly based on non-genetic risk factors. The importance of oestrogen promotion may vary between such populations.     

Is there a basis for prevention of breast cancer with drugs?

The anti-oestrogen drug tamoxifen has led to one of the most important improvements in therapy for breast cancer patients achieved during the last decades. Tamoxifen reduces risk of relapse and improves survival in women with breast cancer. In addition, tamoxifen has favourable effects on the lipoprotein metabolism, reduces morbidity and death from myocardial infarction, and stabilizes bone density in women after menopause. Owing to the good therapeutic results in breast cancer patients and the additional favourable effects of tamoxifen, studies were started among healthy women with elevated risk of breast cancer. The intention was to examine whether tamoxifen could reduce the risk of breast cancer development in healthy women. Recent studies, however, have demonstrated higher risk of endometrium cancer in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen, and higher risk of histological abnormalities in the endometrium in healthy women. Prevention trials, when tamoxifen is given to healthy women, are disputed, owing to the apparent carcinogenic effect of tamoxifen.     

A mild form of Proteus syndrome

An increased level of serum estrogen is one marker of breast cancer risk. We have recently reported that increased risk of advanced breast cancer is associated with a common allele of the cytochrome P450c17alpha gene (CYP17), designated A2. We now show that CYP17 genotype is associated with serum hormone levels among 83 young, nulliparous women. Serum estradiol (E2) levels measured around day 11 of the menstrual cycle were 11 and 57% higher (P = 0.04), respectively, among women hetero- and homozygous for the CYP17 A2 allele compared to A1/A1 women. Similarly, around cycle day 22, E2 levels were 7 and 28% higher (P = 0.06), and progesterone levels were 24 and 30% higher (P = 0.04), respectively. These data provide direct evidence of genetic control of serum hormone levels.     

Detection of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in environmental waters by PCR

We analyzed cancer incidence and mortality in a cohort of 22,597 Swedish women who were prescribed replacement hormones. After 13 years of follow-up in national registries, 2,330 incident cancer cases and 848 cancer deaths were observed. Overall, our results were reassuring since incidence rate ratios (SIRs) for 16 cancer sites and mortality ratios (SMRs) for all 10 examined sites were at, or lower than, unity. However, we found that exposure to an estrogen-progestin combined brand was associated with an increasing relative risk of breast cancer with follow-up time, the SIR reaching 1.4 (95% CI 1.1-1.8) after 10 years of follow-up. The relative risk of endometrial cancer was substantially increased, with the highest SIR of 5.0 (95% CI 1.6-5.9) in women prescribed estrogens alone, whereas those given an estrogen-progestin combination showed no elevation in risk. The risk estimates for liver and biliary tract cancers and for colon cancer were reduced by about 40%, notably in women prescribed the estradiol-progestin compound. Further detailed analyses revealed no evidence of adverse or protective effects on the risk of ovarian, uterine cervical, vulvar/vaginal, rectal, pancreatic, renal, lung, thyroid and other endocrine cancers, brain tumors, malignant melanoma or other skin cancers. Hormone replacement therapy was not associated with an increase in mortality for any cancer site, at this time of follow-up. For breast and endometrial cancers, SMRs were below baseline but tended to increase with follow-up time. We conclude that hormone replacement increases the endometrial-cancer risk after unopposed estrogens and the breast-cancer risk-notably after estrogen-progestin combined therapy-and tentatively suggest that it exerts a protective effect against colon and liver cancer risks.     

Estrogen replacement in women treated for breast cancer

Oestrogen replacement therapy in women with a history of breast cancer has long been considered contraindicated. However, the literature does not indicate an increased risk of recurrent breast cancer in postmenopausal women receiving oestrogen replacement therapy. We advocate that women with a history of breast cancer without nodal involvement could be offered oestrogen replacement therapy and thereby benefit from prevention of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis. But the patients must accept a potentially increased risk of recurrence. We emphasize the need for randomized prospective studies.     

Revision ulnar neuroplasty

The most important factors in the evaluation and treatment of breast pain consist of a thorough history, physical, and radiologic evaluation. These can be used to reassure the patient that she does not have breast cancer. In the 15% of mastalgia patients who have life-altering pain and still request treatment, therapy may consist of a well-fitting bra, a decrease in dietary fat intake, and discontinuance of oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy. Those women still resistant to therapy may experience relief from evening primrose oil supplements, bromocriptine, tamoxifen, or GnRH analogues. Predicting which treatment will be most useful for any particular woman may be challenging. No differences in success rates were found to be associated with factors such as reproductive history, presenting complaint, personal or family history of breast disease, or subsequent need for breast surgery. The peak (but not basal) serum prolactin levels in response to thyrotropin releasing hormone stimulus has been predictive of success for hormonal treatment but is relatively invasive. A survey of treatments actually used was obtained from 276 consultant surgeons in Britain in 1990. Of those, 75% prescribed danazol. Others used analgesia (21%), diuretics (18%), local excision (18%), bromocriptine (15%), evening primrose oil (13%), tamoxifen (9%), a well-fitting bra (3%), and no treatment (10%). Breast specialists were more likely to begin treatment with primrose oil, tamoxifen, vitamin B6, and analgesia, reserving other hormonal therapies for more difficult cases. To further evaluate the women who have severe mastalgia but do not complete treatment regimens, a questionnaire was sent to 79 patients who failed to return to the Longmore Breast Unit of Western General Hospital, Edinburgh. Seventy-one women responded. Of these, 36 said they felt better, 19 said they felt no more could be done, 18 learned to live with it, 14 were not worried even if the pain recurred, 2 were pregnant, 10 were postmenopausal, and 5 were still taking the medications previously prescribed. The prognosis for women with breast pain is not always predictable. Women with cyclic breast pain often are relieved by events that alter their hormonal milieu, whereas noncyclic breast pain may last only 1 to 2 years. Sitruk-Ware and colleagues conducted a study of French women with fibroadenomas. They found an association between fibroadenomas and cyclic mastalgia occurring more than 1 year prior to the first full-term pregnancy. A retrospective, case-control study to determine if cyclic mastalgia was a risk factor for breast cancer was conducted on 210 newly diagnosed women with breast cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Germline BRCA1 mutations and loss of the wild-type allele in tumors from families with early onset breast and ovarian cancer

The BRCA1 gene on human chromosome 17q21 is responsible for an autosomal dominant syndrome of inherited early onset breast/ovarian cancer. It is estimated that women harboring a germline BRCA1 mutation incur an 85% lifetime risk of breast cancer and a greatly elevated risk of ovarian cancer. The BRCA1 gene has recently been isolated and mutations have been found in the germline of affected individuals in linked families. Previous studies of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in breast tumors have been carried out on sporadic tumors derived from individuals without known linkage to BRCA1 and on tumors from linked families. Loss of large regions of chromosome 17 has been observed, but these LOH events could not be unequivocally ascribed to BRCA1. We have studied 28 breast and 6 ovarian tumors from families with strong evidence for linkage between breast cancer and genetic markers flanking BRCA1. These tumors were examined for LOH using genetic markers flanking and within BRCA1, including THRA1, D17S856, EDH17B1, EDH17B2, and D17S183. Forty-six percent (16/34) of tumors exhibit LOH which includes BRCA1. In 8 of 16 tumors the parental origin of the deleted allele could be determined by evaluation of haplotypes of associated family members; in 100% of these cases, the wild-type allele was lost. In some of these families germline mutations in BRCA1 have been determined; analyses of tumors with LOH at BRCA1 have revealed that only the disease-related allele of BRCA1 was present. These data strongly support the hypothesis that BRCA1 is a tumor suppressor gene.     

Dietary fat, calories, and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a prospective population-based study

We tested the hypothesis that a high-fat diet increases the risk of breast cancer in a population-based study of 590 women aged 40-79 years who were without known breast cancer when they provided a quantitative 24-hour diet recall. Fifteen postmenopausal women were diagnosed with incident breast cancer during the next 15 years (approximately 7600 person-years of follow-up). These women had significantly higher age-adjusted intake of all fats (monounsaturated, polyunsaturated, and saturated), and oleic, linoleic, and linolenic acids, with a stepwise increase in risk across tertiles of intake. Fat intake was associated with total calories, protein, and carbohydrates, and women with incident breast cancer consumed more calories, protein, and carbohydrates than did other subjects. When each nutrient variable (calories, fats, protein, and carbohydrates) was adjusted for age, body mass index, age at menopause, parity, and alcohol consumption, the strongest risks for incident breast cancer were associated with total calories (relative risk per standard deviation = 2.72, 95% confidence interval = 1.51-4.89, p = 0.002) and total fats (relative risk per standard deviation = 2.01, 95% confidence interval = 1.19-3.41, p = 0.01). Fat composition of the diet, expressed either as percent of energy or as fat intake adjusted for calories by regression analysis, was not significantly associated with risk of breast cancer. These results support the hypothesis that total calorie consumption, as well as dietary fat consumption, is a risk factor for breast cancer in postmenopausal women, and parallel observations in animal models.     

Alterations in eighteen-carbon saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acid peroxisomal oxidation in mouse brain during development and aging

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To provide an update on the breast cancer genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 and to review available primary preventive options. DATA SOURCES: Published articles, abstracts, and clinical experience. DATA SYNTHESIS: While genetic testing will help identify a cadre of women at high risk for breast cancer development, it also will raise many psychosocial and ethical issues, including if and when to be tested and what patients and healthcare professional should do with the information. CONCLUSIONS: The only currently available putative form of primary prevention is prophylactic mastectomy. Diet and the use of tamoxifen remain areas for future research. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses can play an important role in educating patients who face difficult decisions surrounding genetic testing and primary prevention modalities. Nurses also can design and conduct much needed research in these areas.     

Women's decisions about hormone replacement therapy after education and bone densitometry

BACKGROUND: The decisions that postmenopausal women make about whether to start hormone replacement therapy may depend on the potential risks and benefits of such therapy as well as their risk for osteoporosis-related fractures. This study examined the decisions made by women at risk for osteoporosis-related fractures who were educated about hormone replacement therapy and who were given information about their bone mineral density. METHODS: The study employed a prospective cohort design. Thirty-seven post--menopausal women with risk factors for osteoporosis-related fractures were recruited from an orthopedic clinic at a teaching hospital in Hamilton, Ont. The women were given an education kit (consisting of an audio tape and a work-book) to clarify the benefits and risks of hormone replacement therapy. Two to 4 weeks later, densitometry of the hip and the lumbar spine was performed. A summary of the risks, the densitometry findings and decisions about hormone replacement therapy were given to the women's family physicians for follow-up. Outcome measures included decisions about hormone replacement therapy, as well as use of such therapy and other medications at 12 months. RESULTS: After the education component alone, 10 (27%) of the women requested hormone replacement therapy. After densitometry testing, 4 more requested hormone replacement therapy (for a total of 14 women [38%]). At 12 months, 2 (5%) of the women had been lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 35, 6 (17%) were receiving hormone replacement therapy, 7 (20%) were using bisphosphonates, and 24 (68%) were taking calcium supplements. INTERPRETATION: These preliminary findings suggest that the combination of education about hormone therapy and feedback about bone density is associated with an increase in the use of hormone replacement therapy and other preventive medications by women at risk for osteoporosis-related fractures. However, the observed increase was small and so the clinical significance must be confirmed and clarified.     

Three-year experience with modular stent-graft devices for endovascular AAA treatment

This article reviews recent advances in the effects of estrogen on bone and other body systems. The effect of estrogen use for the prevention of osteoporosis is no longer a matter of debate. Some issues are still discussed, however, especially with regard to the magnitude of its protection (especially for hip fracture), which would be dependent on the time at which estrogen therapy is initiated with respect to menopause as well as its total duration of use. The mechanisms of estrogen's action on bone also remains poorly understood. Controversy persists concerning the specific contribution of an indirect action through the modulation of calciotropic hormones and a direct action on bone cells in which estrogen receptors have been identified. Estrogens have been shown to reduce osteoclastogenesis by modulating the production of cytokines (interleukins, tumor necrosis factor) and transforming growth factor from bone marrow and bone cells. In addition to its effects on bone, a great number of observational studies have evaluated the relationship between estrogen use and coronary heart disease. The overall risk of coronary disease is estimated to be reduced by 50% in women who use estrogen replacement therapy. This reduction would be even greater in women with previous atherosclerosis. Moreover, recent data suggest that estrogen use could be associated with delayed onset and reduced risk for Alzheimer's disease. Overall, estrogen treatment in postmenopausal women has several proven benefits. Conversely, the potential risks of long-term estrogen therapy include a slightly increased risk of breast cancer, which would be associated with long-term use. Although the individual decision for a postmenopausal woman to start estrogen replacement therapy must take into account this risk:benefit ratio, current evidence suggests a clear advantage for estrogen's benefits over its risks.     

BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer

BACKGROUND: To define the incidence of BRCA1 mutations among patients seen in clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer, we analyzed DNA samples from women seen in this setting and constructed probability tables to provide estimates of the likelihood of finding a BRCA1 mutation in individual families. METHODS: Clinical information, family histories, and blood for DNA analysis were obtained from 263 women with breast cancer. Conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing were used to identify BRCA1 mutations. RESULTS: BRCA1 mutations were identified in 16 percent of women with a family history of breast cancer. Only 7 percent of women from families with a history of breast cancer but not ovarian cancer had BRCA1 mutations. The rates were higher among women from families with a history of both breast and ovarian cancer. Among family members, an average age of less than 55 years at the diagnosis of breast cancer, the presence of ovarian cancer, the presence of breast and ovarian cancer in the same woman, and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry were all associated with an increased risk of detecting a BRCA1 mutation. No association was found between the presence of bilateral breast cancer or the number of breast cancers in a family and the detection of a BRCA1 mutation, or between the position of the mutation in the BRCA1 gene and the presence of ovarian cancer in a family. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with breast cancer and a family history of the disease, the percentage with BRCA1 coding-region mutations is less than the 45 percent predicted by genetic-linkage analysis. These results suggest that even in a referral clinic specializing in screening women from high-risk families, the majority of tests for BRCA1 mutations will be negative and therefore uninformative.     

Alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer: the Framingham Study revisited

Although many studies report that moderate-to-heavy alcohol intake increases breast cancer risk, the effect of light alcohol consumption remains controversial, and a consistent pattern of association with different types of alcoholic beverages is not evident. The authors examined the relation of average alcohol consumption and of different beverages to the risk of breast cancer in the Framingham Study (Framingham, Massachusetts). Of 2,764 women followed more than 40 years in the Original Cohort from 1948 to 1993 and 2,284 followed up to 24 years in the Offspring Cohort from 1971 to 1993, 221 and 66 incident breast cancer cases occurred, respectively. Breast cancer incidence decreased from 3.60 per 1,000 person-years to 2.47, 2.30, and 2.33 in increasing categories of average alcohol consumption (none, < 5.0, 5.0-< 15.0, and > or = 15.0 g/day) among the Original Cohort and from 3.07 to 1.26, 1.24, and 2.22, respectively, among the Offspring Cohort. With the two cohorts combined, multivariate-adjusted rate ratios of breast cancer in each increased category of alcohol consumption were 1.0 (nondrinkers), 0.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6-1.1), 0.7 (95% CI 0.5-1.1), and 0.7 (95% CI 0.5-1.1), respectively. Breast cancer was not associated with wine, beer, or spirits consumption when assessed separately. The findings suggest that the light consumption of alcohol or any type of alcoholic beverage is not associated with increased breast cancer risk.