A gradient inverse planning algorithm with dose-volume constraints

There are still some AV nodal reentrant tachycardias with unusual AV nodal properties that need further study to understand these complexities. Accordingly, the two-dimensional model with alpha and beta pathways in the AV nodal reentrant tachycardia circuit certainly is an oversimplification and does not explain adequately the anatomic and physiologic complexity of the AV junctional area. The modern concept suggests that this arrhythmia takes place in a highly complex three-dimensional model with nonuniform anisotropy and discontinuous conduction property in the AV junctional area. Application of radiofrequency energy within the AV junctional area should always be performed carefully to achieve a successful ablation procedure and to minimize possible injury of AV nodal conduction.     

Atrioventricular junctional tissue. Discrepancy between histological and electrophysiological characteristics

BACKGROUND: Previous work has demonstrated that cells with AV nodal-type action potentials are not confined to Koch's triangle but may extend along the AV orifices. The aim of this study was to examine the histological and electrophysiological characteristics of this tissue. METHODS AND RESULTS: Studies were performed in isolated, blood-perfused dog and pig hearts. Microelectrode recordings revealed cells with nodal-type action potentials around the tricuspid and mitral valve rings. These cells were found within 1 to 2 mm of the valve annuli. A zone of cells with intermediate action potentials, approximately 1 cm wide, separated cells with nodal-type action potentials from cells with atrial-type action potentials in the body of the atria. In cells with nodal-type action potentials, adenosine caused a reduction in action potential amplitude (49 +/- 2 versus 33 +/- 2 mV, mean +/- SE; P < .001), upstroke velocity (2.5 +/- 0.2 versus 2.0 +/- 0.2 V/s, P < .05), and duration (150 +/- 4 versus 96 +/- 8 ms, P < .001). The light microscopic appearance of AV junctional cells was similar to that of myocytes in the body of the atrium. A polyclonal antibody raised against connexin-43 bound to atrial and ventricular tissue but not to the AV junctional tissue or AV nodal region. The absence of connexin-43 correlated with the sites of cells with nodal-like action potentials. With pacing techniques, the AV junctional tissue in the region of the posterior AV nodal approaches could be electrically dissociated from atrial, AV nodal, and ventricular tissue. AV nodal echoes were induced with ventricular pacing in three dog hearts. In each case, retrograde conduction was through the slow pathway, and anterograde conduction was through the fast pathway. During echoes, activation of AV junctional cells preceded atrial activation during retrograde slow pathway conduction, but these cells were not activated during anterograde fast pathway conduction. CONCLUSIONS: AV junctional cells around both annuli are histologically similar to atrial cells but resemble nodal cells in their cellular electrophysiology, response to adenosine, and lack of connexin-43. The light microscopic appearance of AV junctional cells is a poor guide to their action potential characteristics. The AV junctional cells in the posterior AV nodal approaches appear to participate in slow pathway conduction. These cells may be the substrate of the slow "AV nodal" pathway.     

Catheter ablation for the common type of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway was attempted in 34 patients with common type of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Radiofrequency energy of 18-32 watts was applied for 30-60 seconds at sites exhibiting atrial-slow pathway potentials or slow potentials. These potentials were recorded at the mid or posterior septum, anterior to the coronary sinus ostium. A mean of two radiofrequency applications successfully eliminated AVNRT in all patients. The incidence of junctional ectopy was significantly higher during 34 effective applications of radiofrequency energy than during 36 ineffective applications (100% versus 17%). Thus, the recording of atrial-slow pathway potentials or slow potentials, and the development of junctional ectopy can be used as a marker for successful ablation. Slow AV nodal conduction was eliminated in 22 patients and persisted without inducible AVNRT in 12. None of the patients had recurrences of AVNRT over a mean follow-up interval of 12 months, and all had preserved AV conduction. Long-term follow-up studies with an electrophysiological method confirmed that the ablation was effective. Transient AV block was observed in only 1 patient, and no major complications were noted. Thus, radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway is highly effective and safe, with a low rate of complication, for the treatment of common type of AVNRT.     

Interferons and retinoids enhance and dexamethasone suppresses urokinase-mediated plasminogen activation in promyelocytic leukemia cells

BACKGROUND: The AV node is frequently the site of reentrant rhythms. These rhythms arise from a slow and a fast pathway for which the anatomic and functional substratum remain debated. This study proposes a new explanation for dual-pathway physiology in which the posterior nodal extension (PNE) provides the substratum for the slow pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: The anatomic and functional properties of the PNE were studied in 14 isolated rabbit heart preparations. A PNE was found in all studied preparations. It appeared as an elongated bundle of specialized tissues lying along the lower side of Koch's triangle between the coronary sinus ostium and compact node. No well-defined boundary separated the PNE, compact node, and lower nodal cell bundle. The electric properties of the PNE were characterized with a premature protocol and surface potential recordings from histologically controlled locations. The PNE showed cycle-length-dependent posteroanterior slow activation with a shorter refractory period (minimum local cycle length) than that of the compact node. During early premature beats resulting in block in transitional tissues, the markedly delayed PNE activation could propagate to maintain or resume nodal conduction and initiate reentrant beats. A shift to PNE conduction resulted in different patterns of discontinuity on conduction curves. Transmembrane action potentials recorded from PNE cells in 6 other preparations confirmed the slow nature of PNE potentials. CONCLUSIONS: The PNE is a normal anatomic feature of the rabbit AV node. It constitutes a cycle-length-dependent slow pathway with a shorter refractory period than that of the compact node. Propagated PNE activation can account for a discontinuity in conduction curves, markedly delayed AV nodal responses, and reentry. Finally, the PNE provides a substratum for the slow pathway in dual-pathway physiology.     

Adenosine-sensitive atrial reentrant tachycardia originating from the atrioventricular nodal transitional area

INTRODUCTION: Atrial tachycardia shows wide variations in its electrophysiologic properties and sites of origin. We report an atrial tachycardia with ECG manifestations and electrophysiologic characteristics similar to an atypical form of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: This supraventricular tachycardia was observed in 11 patients. It was initiated by atrial extrastimulation with an inverse relationship between the coupling interval of an extrastimulus and the postextrastimulus interval. Its induction was not related to a jump in the AH interval, and its perpetuation was independent of conduction block in AV node. Ventricular pacing during tachycardia demonstrated AV dissociation without affecting the atrial cycle length. A very small dose of adenosine triphosphate (mean 3.9 +/- 1.2 mg) could terminate the tachycardia. The earliest atrial activation during tachycardia was recorded at the low anteroseptal right atrium with a different intra-atrial activation sequence from that recorded during ventricular pacing, where the tachycardia was successfully ablated in 9 of 10 attempted patients. Bidirectional AV nodal conduction remained unaffected after successful ablation. CONCLUSION: There may be an entity of adenosine-sensitive atrial tachycardia probably due to focal reentry within the AV node or its transitional tissues without involvement of the AV nodal pathways. This tachycardia can be ablated without disturbing AV nodal conduction from the right atrial septum.     

Impact of severity of coronary artery stenosis and the collateral circulation on the functional outcome of dyssynergic myocardium after revascularization in patients with healed myocardial infarction and chronic left ventricular dysfunction

The inferoposterior region of the triangle of Koch is hypothesized to be the location of the atrial insertion of the slow atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathway. However, the actual site of conduction slowing in the slow AV nodal pathway is unknown. Entrainment mapping during AV nodal reentry can localize the reentrant pathway as follows: the AH interval measured from the mapping catheter = A'H (where A' is the exit site of the reentrant circuit) minus A'A (the conduction time from A' to the site of mapping); the SH interval during entrainment = SA' (the conduction time from stimulus into the reentry circuit) plus A'H. Thus, in all cases, the SH interval should be greater than or equal to the AH interval, and the deltaAH-SH should increase as distance and conduction time (SA' and A'A) from the reentry circuit increases. Fourteen patients with typical AV nodal reentry (cycle length 346 +/- 62 ms) and 1 with fast-slow (cycle length 430 ms) underwent activation and entrainment mapping from 8 to 12 sites in the triangle of Koch and coronary sinus. Pacing was performed at 2 to 3 mA above threshold, at a cycle length 10 ms shorter than tachycardia. A mapping site was defined as being in close proximity to the circuit if the deltaAH-SH was within 120% of the shortest 20th percentile deltaAH-SH value from all measured sites. In the 14 typical cases, 45 of 83 sites (54%) in the anatomic slow pathway region fulfilled criteria for close proximity to the reentry circuit compared with 13 of 50 sites (26%) outside of this region (p = 0.005). For these patients, the shortest SH interval measured from any entrainment site was 294 +/- 58 ms (89 +/- 10% of tachycardia cycle length, range 70% to 119%), indicating that the site of slow conduction in the slow pathway during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was distal to all mapped sites. Thus, during typical AV nodal reentry, the "slow" pathway does not conduct slowly, and its insertion is located at or within the inferoposterior or midseptal regions in most cases.     

Absence of junctional rhythm during successful slow-pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: The presence of junctional rhythm has been considered to be a sensitive marker of successful slow-pathway ablation. However, in rare cases, junctional rhythm was absent despite multiple radiofrequency applications delivered over a large area in the Koch's triangle, and successful ablation was achieved in the absence of a junctional rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 353 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (143 men and 210 women; mean age, 50+/-17 years) who underwent catheter ablation of the slow pathway. Combined anatomic and electrogram approaches were used to guide ablation. Inducibility of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was assessed after each application of radiofrequency energy. Successful sites were located in the posterior area in 18 (90%) of 20 patients without junctional rhythm during slow-pathway ablation compared with 200 (60%) of 333 patients with junctional rhythm (P<0.001). The fast-slow form of tachycardia was more common in patients without than in those with junctional rhythm (30% versus 3%; P=0.001). At the successful ablation sites, patients with junctional rhythm had a higher incidence of a multicomponent or slow-pathway potential (51% versus 10%; P<0.001), a longer duration of the atrial electrogram (64+/-8 versus 50+/-9 ms; P=0.04), and a smaller atrial/ventricular electrogram amplitude ratio (0.29+/-0.18 versus 0.65+/-0.27; P<0. 001) than those without junctional rhythm. Mean temperatures at successful sites (56+/-6 degreesC versus 58+/-9 degreesC; P=0.57) and incidence of transient AV block (2% versus 0%; P=0.86) were similar between patients with and without junctional rhythms. By multivariate analysis, location of ablation sites, atrial/ventricular electrogram amplitude ratio, absence of a multicomponent or slow-pathway potential, and occurrence of the fast-slow form of tachycardia were independent predictors of the absence of a junctional rhythm during successful slow-pathway ablation. CONCLUSIONS: In some rare cases, successful slow-pathway ablation is possible in the absence of a junctional rhythm.     

Malaise scores in adulthood of children and young people who have been in care

Junctional rhythm is commonly observed during radiofrequency catheter ablation of the fast or slow pathways of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, the origin of these beats remains unclear. We analyzed the retrograde atrial activation sequence of 16 patients (mean +/- SD: 41.2 +/- 18.9 years old) undergoing catheter ablation for typical AVNRT with detailed catheter mapping of the triangle of Koch. The earliest atrial activations were concordant during tachycardia and junctional rhythm in only 5 of 16 patients. The findings suggest that junctional rhythm is unlikely to represent direct stimulation of the atrioventricular (AV) node via a discrete slow pathway but rather results from enhanced automaticity from > or =1 sites in the AV nodal transitional zone. The ensuing atrial activation pattern results from anisotropic spread from these sites. In addition, these data imply that the original concept of the AV node comprising 2 anatomically defined pathways may not be valid, and that a functionally defined pathway model may be a more accurate representation.     

Cycle-length-dependent properties of AV nodal activation in rabbit hearts

Cycle-length-dependent changes in AV nodal cell activation were studied in isolated preparations from rabbit hearts. Transmembrane action potentials were recorded from the node while it was propagating impulses initiated in the atrium with an accelerating train of stimuli. This train consisting of five successive stimuli separated by progressively shorter intervals was uniformly repeated at every 10th basic beat, each time reproducing a sequence of five different increasing AV nodal delays. The AN and NH cells were found to contribute only slightly to the cycle-length-dependent AV nodal delay which developed mainly in the small N zone, located centrally in the AV node. With the increasing delay, the action potentials from this N zone typically dissociated into two components synchronous with late AN and early NH activity, respectively. The amplitude of the first component decreased, wheareas that of the second increased progressively in N cells activated progressively later. No cells were activated at an intermediate time between the two components. This dissociation was not accompanied by changes in the activation pattern of the AV node. The different nodal cells classified according to their response to the accelerating train delineated functional zones corresponding to different anatomic structures. The possible mechanisms which would explain the cycle-length-dependent AV nodal delay are discussed.     

Complex electrophysiological characteristics in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia with continuous atrioventricular node function curves

BACKGROUND: Although typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with discontinuous AV node function curves has been well studied, there has been a lack of any significant information about AVNRT without evidence of dual AV nodal pathway physiology during atrial extrastimulus testing or atrial pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Group 1 included 9 patients with continuous curves during atrial extrastimulus testing but without a jump (> or = 50 ms) of the atrial-His bundle (AH) interval during incremental atrial pacing. The maximal AH interval during atrial pacing (266 +/- 61 versus 168 +/- 27 ms, P = .007) or extrastimulus testing (290 +/- 60 versus 176 +/- 18 ms, P = .005) shortened significantly after ablation. Antegrade and retrograde AV node properties were similar before and after ablation. Group 2 included 14 patients with continuous curves and a jump of the AH interval during incremental atrial pacing. The atrial pacing cycle length with 1:1 AV conduction and effective refractory period (ERP) of the antegrade AV node increased significantly, whereas the maximal AH interval during atrial pacing (358 +/- 70 versus 203 +/- 28 ms, P = .001) or extrastimulus testing (338 +/- 75 versus 196 +/- 34 ms, P = .002) shortened significantly after ablation. Group 3 included 24 patients with discontinuous curves. The maximal AH interval during atrial pacing or extrastimulus testing and the ERP of the antegrade fast AV node shortened, whereas the ERP of the antegrade AV node increased significantly after ablation. The maximal AH interval before ablation, extent of decrease in maximal AH interval after ablation, ERP of the retrograde AV node before ablation, and tachycardia cycle length were significantly shorter in group 1 than groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: In AVNRT with continuous AV node function curves, dual AV nodal pathway physiology may or may not be demonstrated during atrial pacing. Significant shortening of the maximal AH interval during atrial pacing after radiofrequency ablation suggests successful elimination of AVNRT.     

High-resolution fluorescent imaging does not reveal a distinct atrioventricular nodal anterior input channel (fast pathway) in the rabbit heart during sinus rhythm

INTRODUCTION: We sought to determine the precise pathways of engagement of the AV node during sinus rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts were stained with 20 microM of the voltage-sensitive dye di-4-ANEPPS. Preparations containing the right atrium, sinoatrial (SA) and AV nodes, and interatrial septum were subsequently dissected and mapped in vitro using a 16 X 16 photodiode array with an adjustable resolution of 150 to 750 microns per diode. Motion artifacts were eliminated by using 15 mM 2,3-butanedione monoxime (BDM). Activation time-points were defined as (-dF/dt)max' where F = fluorescence. Isochronal maps of activation were plotted using the triangulation method. In all preparations, spontaneous activation began at the SA node, rapidly spread along the crista terminalis (CrT), entered the AV nodal region via the posterior "slow" pathway, and retrogradely spread to the septal region with a smaller conduction velocity compared to that along the CrT. Collision of anterograde and retrograde wavefronts was frequently observed in the mid-septum. Notably, there was no evidence for the presence of a distinct anterior entrance into the AV node. CONCLUSIONS: Fast pathway conduction during sinus rhythm results from a broad posterior wavefront that envelops the AV node with subsequent retrograde atrial septal activation.     

Induction of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia with adenosine: differential effect of adenosine on fast and slow atrioventricular node pathways

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the sensitivity of fast and slow atrioventricular (AV) node pathways to incremental doses of adenosine in patients with typical AV node reentrant tachycardia. BACKGROUND: Although adenosine is known to depress conduction through the AV node, the relative sensitivity to adenosine of the anterograde fast and slow pathways in patients with dual AV node pathways and typical AV node reentrant tachycardia has not previously been studied. METHODS: Sixteen patients with dual AV node physiology and typical AV node reentrant tachycardia and 10 control patients were given incremental doses of adenosine during atrial pacing. RESULTS: In 14 of 16 patients with dual-AV node physiology, administration of small doses of adenosine during atrial pacing led consistently to transient block of impulse conduction in the fast pathway before block in the slow pathway, resulting in abrupt prolongation of the AH interval with continued 1:1 AV conduction. The mean (+/- SD) doses of adenosine required to cause conduction block in the fast and slow pathways were 2.7 +/- 3.0 and 7.2 +/- 4.7 mg, respectively (p = 0.004). In 9 of 16 patients, administration of low dose adenosine led to initiation of AV node reentrant tachycardia. The control patients showed no abrupt increases in AH interval with administration of adenosine during atrial pacing. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients with dual AV node pathways and typical AV node reentrant tachycardia, the fast pathway is more sensitive than the slow pathway to the effects of adenosine.     

Narrow complex tachycardia with VA block: diagnostic and therapeutic implications

To review our experience with cases of narrow complex tachycardia with VA block, highlighting the difficulties in the differential diagnosis, and the therapeutic implications. Prior reports of patients with narrow complex tachycardia with VA block consist of isolated case reports. The differential diagnosis of this disorder includes: automatic junctional tachycardia, AV nodal reentry with final upper common pathway block, concealed nodofascicular (ventricular) pathway, and intra-Hissian reentry. Between June 1994 and January 1996, six patients with narrow complex tachycardia with episodes of ventriculoatrial block were referred for evaluation. All six patients underwent attempted radiofrequency ablation of the putative arrhythmic site. Three of six patients had evidence suggestive of a nodofascicular tract. Intermittent antegrade conduction over a left-sided nodofascicular tract was present in two patients and the diagnosis of a concealed nodofascicular was made in the third patient after ruling out other tachycardia mechanisms. Two patients had automatic junctional tachycardia, and one patient had atrioventricular nodal reentry with proximal common pathway block. Attempted ablation in the posterior and mid-septum was unsuccessful in patients with nodofascicular tachycardia. In contrast, those with atrioventricular nodal reentry and automatic junctional tachycardia readily responded to ablation. The presence of a nodofascicular tachycardia should be suspected if: (1) intermittent antegrade preexcitation is recorded, (2) the tachycardia can be initiated with a single atrial premature producing two ventricular complexes, and (3) a single ventricular extrastimulus initiates SVT without a retrograde His deflection. The presence of a nodofascicular pathway is common in patients with narrow complex tachycardia and VA block. Unlike AV nodal reentry and automatic junctional tachycardia, the response to ablation is poor.     

Ventriculophasic modulation of atrioventricular nodal conduction in humans

BACKGROUND: Baroreceptor-mediated phasic changes in vagal tone have been hypothesized to cause ventriculophasic sinus arrhythmia (VPSA). The objectives of this study were to demonstrate ventriculophasic modulation of AV nodal conduction and to substantiate the role of the baroreflex on ventriculophasic AV nodal conduction (VPAVN) by pharmacological perturbation of parasympathetic tone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve patients with infra-Hisian second-degree heart block and VPSA were studied. Incremental atrial pacing was performed until AV nodal Wenckebach block at baseline, after phenylephrine infusion, and after atropine. AV nodal conduction curves were constructed for each phase and compared. At baseline, VPAVN was present in 9 of 12 patients on the steep portion of the AV nodal conduction curves. Phenylephrine increased systolic blood pressure from 149+/-33 to 177+/-22 mmHg (P<0.001) and sinus cycle length from 844+/-169 to 1010+/-190 ms (P<0.001) and shifted the AV nodal conduction curves up and to the right. Phenylephrine induced VPAVN in 2 of 3 patients in whom it was not present at baseline and in 11 of 12 total. Atropine abolished both VPSA and VPAVN in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: VPAVN was demonstrated in patients with infra-Hisian second-degree AV block. It was accentuated by phenylephrine and abolished by atropine, suggesting a baroreflex mechanism for VPSA and VPAVN.     

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients with ventriculo-atrial conduction block

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the reversibility of retrograde ventriculo-atrial block by isoproterenol in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). DESIGN: Three case reports and their electrophysiological features. PATIENTS: Three patients with documented or suspected paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. INTERVENTIONS: At routine electrophysiology study, no supraventricular tachycardia was inducible in the baseline state. Infusion of isoproterenol (1 to 5 micrograms/min) was given and stimulation procedures were repeated. RESULTS: At baseline, all three patients had discontinuous antegrade atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction, but very poor (two patients) or absent (one patient) ventriculo atrial conduction prevented induction of AVNRT. During infusion of isoproterenol, retrograde conduction was enhanced so that 1:1 retrograde occurred to cycle lengths of 300, 340 and 260 ms. AVNRT was then inducible in all patients, reproducing their clinical symptoms. CONCLUSION: Absent or poor ventriculo-atrial conduction in patients with suspected AV node reentry does not preclude the development of tachycardia with sympathomimetic enhancement. Isoproterenol should be given to attempt reversal of retrograde block in these patients.     

A simple technique for selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVES: A simple technique was designed for radiofrequency ablation therapy of atrioventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia. BACKGROUND: This technique was based on the hypothesis that slow pathway conduction reflects conduction through the compact node and its posterior atrial input. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients were studied; there were 37 men and 63 women, with a mean age of 48 +/- 15 years. All 100 patients had induction of sustained tachycardia with (51 patients) or without (49 patients) administration of isoproterenol or atropine, or both. The ablation catheter was initially manipulated to record the largest His bundle deflection from the apex of Koch's triangle. It was then curved downward and clockwise to the area of the compact node when His deflection was no longer visible and the ratio of atrial to ventricular electrogram was < 1. The radiofrequency current was delivered from the 4-mm tip electrode a mean of 5 +/- 7 times at a power of 25 +/- 4 W for a duration of 21 +/- 4 s. The total fluoroscopic time was 19 +/- 11 min. RESULTS: Selective ablation (56 patients) or modification (26 patients) of the slow pathway without affecting anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction was achieved in 82 patients. Ablation or modification of both the retrograde fast pathway and the slow pathway but with preservation of anterograde fast pathway conduction was noted in 12 patients. Ablation or modification of the retrograde fast pathway alone or both anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction was noted in three patients. Complete AV node block occurred in three patients. Seventy-three patients had no induction of echo beats or tachycardia and 24 patients had induction of a single echo beat after ablation. Follow-up study was performed in 62 patients 76 +/- 18 days after ablation. Thirty-nine patients had no induction of echo beats or tachycardia, 22 had induction of echo beats alone and 1 patient had induction of sustained tachycardia. CONCLUSION: Selective ablation of the slow AV node pathway can be achieved by a simple procedure with a high success rate and few complications.     

Differential effect of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have shown that the fast pathway is more responsive to adenosine than the slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Little information is available regarding the effect of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effects of adenosine on anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction were evaluated in 116 patients (mean age 47 +/- 16 years) with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. Each patient received 12 mg of adenosine during ventricular pacing at a cycle length 20 msec longer than the fast pathway VA block cycle length and during sinus rhythm or atrial pacing at 20 msec longer than the fast pathway AV block cycle length. Anterograde block occurred in 98% of patients compared with retrograde fast pathway block in 62% of patients (P < 0.001). Unresponsiveness of the retrograde fast pathway to adenosine was associated with a shorter AV block cycle length (374 +/- 78 vs 333 +/- 74 msec, P < 0.01), a shorter VA block cycle length (383 +/- 121 vs 307 +/- 49 msec, P < 0.001), and a shorter VA interval during tachycardia (53 +/- 23 vs 41 +/- 17 msec, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Although anterograde fast pathway conduction is almost always blocked by 12 mg of adenosine, retrograde fast pathway conduction is not blocked by adenosine in 38% of patients with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. This indicates that the anterograde and retrograde fast pathways may be anatomically and/or functionally distinct. Unresponsiveness of VA conduction to adenosine is not a reliable indicator of an accessory pathway.     

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular junctional ("AV nodal") reentrant tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Catheter ablation of tachycardias has been undertaken successfully in patients with ICDs without damage to the ICD or lead. Ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway, however, is technically challenging because the lead of the ICD lies close to the ablation site. We report successful ablation of AV junctional reentrant tachycardia (AVJRT) in three patients with ICDs. In all cases, the ablation site was within a few millimeters of the ICD lead. The ablation was successful in all cases and did not cause damage to the ICD or lead. The patients have remained free of recurrence of AVJRT during a mean follow-up of 12 months.     

Posterior fast atrioventricular node pathways: implications for radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to present evidence that fast atrioventricular (AV) node pathways with posterior exit sites may participate in typical AV node reentry. BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of the slow AV node pathway in the posteroseptal right atrium is the preferred therapeutic approach in patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia. Despite the success achieved with this approach, electrophysiologic changes consistent with fast pathway ablation are occasionally observed. One potential explanation is the presence of an aberrant posterior fast pathway. METHODS: The location of fast and slow AV node pathways was determined by atrial activation mapping along the tricuspid valve annulus during tachycardia and was further confirmed by the effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation. RESULTS: Seven patients with AV node reentrant tachycardia had evidence of a posterior fast pathway near the coronary sinus os. Abolition of anterograde and retrograde fast pathway conduction followed radiofrequency ablation in the posteroseptal region in six patients. Consistent with fast pathway ablation, the AH interval increased from 70 +/- 24 to 195 +/- 35 ms (mean +/- SD), and tachycardia was no longer inducible. Selective slow pathway ablation was performed in one other patient with a posterior fast pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Functionally fast AV node pathways may be located in the posteroseptal right atrium, where slow pathway modification is performed. These data delineate the limitation of an anatomically guided slow pathway ablative approach and emphasize the importance of detailed mapping and localization of the retrograde fast pathway exit site before ablation. Failure to recognize the presence of posterior fast AV node pathways may account for sporadic examples of AV block, complicating posteroseptal ablation in patients with AV node reentry.