The impact of office chair features on lumbar lordosis,intervertebral joint and sacral tilt angles: a radiographic assessment

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine which office chair feature is better at improving spine posture in sitting. Method: Participants (n = 28) were radiographed in standing, maximum flexion and seated in four chair conditions: control, lumbar support, seat pan tilt and backrest with scapular relief. Measures of lumbar lordosis, intervertebral joint angles and sacral tilt were compared between conditions and sex. Results: Sitting consisted of approximately 70% of maximum range of spine flexion. No differences in lumbar flexion were found between the chair features or control. Significantly more anterior pelvic rotation was found with the lumbar support (p = 0.0028) and seat pan tilt (p < 0.0001). Males had significantly more anterior pelvic rotation and extended intervertebral joint angles through L1–L3 in all conditions (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: No one feature was statistically superior with respect to minimising spine flexion, however, seat pan tilt resulted in significantly improved pelvic posture.

Practitioner Summary: Seat pan tilt, and to some extent lumbar supports, appear to improve seated postures. However, sitting, regardless of chair features used, still involves near end range flexion of the spine. This will increase stresses to the spine and could be a potential injury generator during prolonged seated exposures.     

The determination of pressures and patterns for the male human buttocks and thigh in sitting utilizing conductive foam

Pressures and patterns for twelve male human buttocks and thighs in sitting in three different shaped seat pans were determined. Pressure was determined by multiple transducers situated geometrically on a conductive foam blanket which measured changes in resistance with an ohm meter as pressure was applied. The three chair seat pans consisted of a small round surgeons type stool, a standard biomechanic secretarial shaped chair, and a neutral posture chair which was a unique combination of a forward-sloping cultivator seat and an English saddle with wrap around leg trough support. Trunk-thigh posture angles of 90 and 127 deg for each chair were evaluated. The location of the maximum pressure points for all chair posture treatments had generally small tight patterns whose locations where consistent with the locations of the ischial tuberosities. The mean pressure was found to vary inversely with the total area. Thus, as the seat pan surface area decreased in total area in contact with the buttock-thigh, the larger the mean pressure became. Mean pressure values were also found to be in the same rank order and relative magnitude to subjective comfort for the buttock-thigh, conducted in related experiments on the chair-posture treatments. The neutral posture chair was found to reduce buttock-thigh maximum pressure from 118.94 mmHg (2.3 psi) to 62.06 mmHg (1.2 psi) and to reduce mean pressure by more than 50%.     

An evaluation of comfort of a bus seat

The aim of this research was to evaluate the comfort of a passenger seat for a new type of bus. A fuzzy set model of a multistage comfort scale (MCS) was adopted for the assessment of comfort, together with the techniques of human back shape and EMG measurements as well as posture analysis. The subjects were 30 university students. It is concluded that MCS is a rapid but comprehensive evaluation method for single chair evaluation. The overall rating of MCS is 0.532, which is acceptable under the conditions of the prototype evaluation. The seat profile fits better with the back curve of subjects who had higher comfort rating in the way that the upper profile of the seat coincides with the human back curve and the lower part of the profile intersects the human back curve in the lumbar region; here the human back curves were measured in the slumped sitting posture. There was a significant difference in the EMGs of back muscles between the two sitting postures (sitting upright and the slumped sitting posture) at all the seat heights.     

Comparison of four specific dynamic office chairs with a conventional office chair: impact upon muscle activation, physical activity and posture

Prolonged and static sitting postures provoke physical inactivity at VDU workplaces and are therefore discussed as risk factors for the musculoskeletal system. Manufacturers have designed specific dynamic office chairs featuring structural elements which promote dynamic sitting and therefore physical activity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of four specific dynamic chairs on erector spinae and trapezius EMG, postures/joint angles and physical activity intensity (PAI) compared to those of a conventional standard office chair. All chairs were fitted with sensors for measurement of the chair parameters (backrest inclination, forward and sideward seat pan inclination), and tested in the laboratory by 10 subjects performing 7 standardized office tasks and by another 12 subjects in the field during their normal office work. Muscle activation revealed no significant differences between the specific dynamic chairs and the reference chair. Analysis of postures/joint angles and PAI revealed only a few differences between the chairs, whereas the tasks performed strongly affected the measured muscle activation, postures and kinematics. The characteristic dynamic elements of each specific chair yielded significant differences in the measured chair parameters, but these characteristics did not appear to affect the sitting dynamics of the subjects performing their office tasks.     

A parametric investigation on seat/occupant contact forces and their relationship with initially perceived discomfort using a configurable seat

The present work investigates the contact forces between sitters and seat as well as their correlations with perceived discomfort. Twelve different economy class aeroplane seat configurations were simulated using a multi-adjustable experimental seat by varying seat pan and backrest angles, as well as seat pan compressed surface. Eighteen males and 18 females, selected by their body mass index and stature, tested these configurations for two sitting postures. Perceived discomfort was significantly affected by seat parameters and posture and correlated both with normal force distribution on the seat-pan surface and with normal forces at the lumbar and head supports. Lower discomfort ratings were obtained for more evenly distributed normal forces on the seat pan. Shear force at the seat pan surface was at its lowest when sitters were allowed to self-select their seat-pan angle, supporting that a shear force should be reduced but not zeroed to improve seating comfort.

Practitioner Summary: The effects of seat-pan and backrest angle, anthropometric dimensions and sitting posture on contact forces and perceived discomfort were investigated using a multi-adjustable experimental seat. In addition to preferred seat profile parameters, the present work provides quantitative guidelines on contact force requirement for improving seating comfort.     

Review of anthropometric considerations for tractor seat design

Tractor driving imposes a lot of physical and mental stress upon the operator. If the operator's seat is not comfortable, his work performance may be poor and there is also a possibility of accidents. The optimal design of tractor seat may be achieved by integrating anthropometric data with other technical features of the design. This paper reviews the existing information on the tractor seat design that considers anthropometry and biomechanical factors and gives an approach for seat design based on anthropometric data. The anthropometric dimensions, i.e. popliteal height sitting (5th percentile), hip breadth sitting (95th percentile), buttock popliteal length (5th percentile), interscye breadth (5th and 95th percentile) and sitting acromion height (5th percentile) of agricultural workers need to be taken into consideration for design of seat height, seat pan width, seat pan length, seat backrest width and seat backrest height, respectively, of a tractor. The seat dimensions recommended for tractor operator's comfort based on anthropometric data of 5434 Indian male agricultural workers were as follows: seat height of 380 mm, seat pan width of 420–450 mm, seat backrest width of 380–400 mm (bottom) and 270–290 mm (top), seat pan length of 370±10 mm, seat pan tilt of 5–7° backward and seat backrest height of 350 mm.

Relevance to industry

The approach presented in this paper for tractor seat design based on anthropometric considerations will help the tractor seat designers to develop and introduce seats suiting to the requirements of the user population. This will not only enhance the comfort of the tractor operators but may also help to reduce the occupational health problems of tractor operators.     

Estimation of various sitting postures using a load-cell-driven monitoring system

Maintaining correct sitting posture is highly likely by simply informing seated people of their current sitting postures. Few studies have simultaneously applied load distribution measurements and sitting posture feedback to measure bodily pressure distribution. Commercialization of sitting posture monitoring systems has been difficult due to high cost. This study tested a system that measures load on the seat pan and load transferred to the backrest using four load cells installed on the seat pan. Three body weight ratios were calculated and differences in body weight ratios were tested among six sitting postures. The results were considered highly reliable based on strong correlations among three instruments’ results despite differences in force plate and dead load between the results of the monitoring system and the load-measuring system. The findings encourage commercialization and future research that includes gender and physical characteristic differences.     

Seated buttock contours: a pilot study of Australian senior high-school students

Both posture and comfort of a chair are influenced by the contour and characteristics of the seat. Knowledge of seat contours of a student population could thus be useful in the design of school chairs. This study investigated seated buttock contours of senior high-school students in order to determine: (a) their general characteristics, (b) the effect of gender and sitting posture and (c) the relationship between the contours and selected anthropometric variables (stature and mass). A contour measurement device was developed and used to measure buttock contours in five sitting postures (typing, sitting up, sitting back, slumping and writing). Buttock contours were quantified by constructing anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral profiles from which six discrete profile dimension measurements were made. AP and lateral profiles were found to have a consistent shape across all participants. Five out of six profile dimensions were significantly different between genders, with just one significantly different between sitting postures (typing and sitting back). Correlations between anthropometric measures and profile dimensions were relatively low (r < 0.34) with no clear patterns evident. Overall results of this study suggest that buttock contours are influenced by gender to a greater extent than sitting posture.     

Lipoatrophia semicircularis and the relation with office work.

The relation between lipoatrophia semicircularis (LS--band-like circular depressions and isolated atrophy of the subcutaneous fatty tissue on the anterior thighs and sitting posture or pressure on the seat surface of office chairs was investigated in an office environment. A questionnaire was presented to 21 subjects and electromyographic measurements, video analysis and pressure measurements were performed. Remarkable posture differences between the LS group and the group without LS were found: less use of the lumbar support of the chair, static sitting postures and a too high seat surface of the office chair were characteristics of the subjects with LS. These observations were confirmed by higher pressure measurements for the subjects with LS. In addition, highly significant pressure differences were found between different chairs.     

Spinal shrinkage with three different types of chair whilst performing video display unit work

The aim of the study was to investigate the magnitude of spinal shrinkage during video display unit (VDU) work when subjects were sitting on chairs with different design with forward-sloping seats with or without backrest, armrest or knee support and when using a conventional chair with horizontal seat. Three different chairs were investigated: A “Conventional chair” with horizontal seat, B “Ullman chair” with front half of seat sloping forward and back half horizontal, and C “Balans chair” with forward-sloping seat plus knee support. Eight healthy subjects used to professional VDU work volunteered to participate in this field study, which was performed at their own workplaces. The median shrinkage after a three-hour period was 1.3, 1.8 and 3.1 mm for chairs A, B and C, respectively. All subjects shrank more (p < 0.05) when sitting on the chair with knee support (C) than when sitting on the conventional chair. There was no statistically significant difference in shrinkage between chairs A and B, or between chairs B and C.     

Transmission of vertical vibration through a seat: Effect of thickness of foam cushions at the seat pan and the backrest

The perception of vehicle ride comfort is influenced by the dynamic performance of full-depth foam used in many vehicle seats. The effects of the thickness of foam on the dynamic stiffness (i.e., stiffness and damping as a function of frequency) of foam cushions with three thicknesses (60, 80, and 100 mm), and the vibration transmitted through these cushions at the seat pan and the backrest were measured with 12 subjects (6 males and 6 females). With increasing thickness, the stiffness and the damping of the foam decreased. With increasing thickness of foam at the seat pan, the resonance frequencies around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the seat pan cushion and the backrest cushion decreased. For the conditions investigated, it is concluded that the thickness of foam at a vertical backrest has little effect on the vertical in-line or fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the foam at either the seat pan or the backrest. The frequencies of the primary resonances around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line transmissibility and the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of foam at the seat pan were highly correlated. Compared to sitting on a rigid seat pan with a foam backrest, sitting with foam at both the seat pan and the backrest reduced the resonance frequency in the vertical in-line transmissibility of the backrest foam and increased the associated transmissibility at resonance, while the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the backrest was little affected. Compared to sitting without a backrest, sitting with a rigid vertical backrest increased the resonance frequency of the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the seat pan cushion and increased the transmissibility at resonance.Relevance to industryThe transmissibility of a seat is determined by the dynamic properties of the occupant of the seat and the dynamic properties of the seat. This study shows how the thicknesses of foam at a seat pan and foam at a backrest affect the in-line and cross-axis transmissibilities of the foams at the seat pan and the backrest. The findings have application to the design of vehicle seats to minimise the transmission of vibration to the body.     

Human–seat interface analysis of upper and lower body weight distribution

The human–seat interfaces were analyzed to determine the differential distribution of the body weight to the components of seat. Fifteen volunteers were tested on a simulated seat system with two piezoelectric force platforms, one placed as chair seat pan and the other placed on the floor surface as footrest. The seated configurations included back inclines (75° and 80°), upright (90°) and reclines (95°, 105° and 115°), absence or presence of armrest (adjusted at 62–68 cm of height), forward and backward sloping of the seat pan, and supported and unsupported back. The armrest and backrest assemblies were isolated from the force platforms. The difference in the body weight (kgf) to the sum of forces recorded at seat pan and feet yielded the extent of weight transferred to other features (e.g., backrest and armrest). The weight distributed at seat was 10–12% less at back inclines (p<0.01) as compared to upright unsupported sitting. With the backrest reclined beyond 95°, the weight at seat gradually decreased by 9% at 115° recline. The load distributed at feet varied narrowly; however, it was significantly greater (p<0.01) at upright supported back, compared to unsupported back. The height of the armrest was optimized at 68 cm, since the weight distribution at seat pan consistently reduced by 12% at that height, as compared to the absence of armrest (F_(4,524)=8.80, p<0.05). The suggested height of the armrest corresponded to 40% of the body stature of the selected volunteers. The load distributed at feet was 18% greater with the presence of armrest, indicating that a part of the weight of the upper leg fell on the seat pan, when the armrest was absent. The weight fell on the seat in slouch posture was 5% less than in upright sitting, while the weight at feet was marginally higher in slouch than in upright posture. The study maintained that the horizontal as well as 5° forward slope of the seat might be the preferred choice, since the load distributed at seat was highest at backward sloping seat for all conditions of supported and unsupported back. The study reaffirms that the backrest and armrest have conjoint influence in reducing the load distributed at seat, which in turn might help in mitigating stress on the spinal and other paraspinal structures.

Relevance to Industry

The human–seat interface analysis and understanding of body weight distribution to the components of seat may be beneficial for ergo-design application in optimizing parameters for chair configurations that provide comfort and safety to the user.     

Background to sitting at work: research-based requirements for the design of work seats

The body's responses to sitting are complex and involve the anatomy and physiology of the sitter as well as the structure of the seat, the desk and the environment. In the light of recent research, the major reactions of the spine, the muscles and the spinal discs are discussed. Their interactions when adopting sitting postures are described. Reasons are given why certain sitting postures are to be preferred. The mechanisms that may give rise to muscle and disc damage, as well as back pain, as a result of adverse sitting postures are outlined. The design consequences of the research are then presented, showing how the seat shape arises from the previously described data. The influence of backrest design on sitting comfort and in the reduction of loading on the body is shown. Finally, a brief discussion of the influences from the work surface illustrates how the combination of seat and workplace can reduce the risks of injury by mitigating body loadings over the working day.     

Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part II): Relationships with and prediction from interface pressure

Pressure at the driver–seat interface has been used as an objective method to assess seat design, yet existing evidence regarding its efficacy is mixed. The current study examined associations between three subjective ratings (overall, comfort, and discomfort) and 36 measures describing driver–seat interface pressure, and identified pressure level, contact area, and ratio (local to global) variables that could be effectively used to improve subjective responses. Each of 27 participants was involved in six separate driving sessions which included combinations of two seats (from vehicles ranked high and low on overall comfort), two vehicle classes (sedan and SUV), and two driving venues (lab-based and field). Several pressure variables were identified as more effective for assessing sitting comfort and discomfort across a range of individual statures. Based on the results, specific approaches are recommended to improve the sitting experience: (1) lower pressure ratios at the buttocks and higher pressure ratios at the upper and lower back; and (2) balanced pressure between the bilateral buttocks, and between the lower and upper body. Finally, separate analyses supported that human–seat interface pressure was more strongly related with overall and comfort ratings than with discomfort ratings.

Relevance to industry

Several interface pressure variables were identified that showed associations with subjective responses during sitting. Use of these measures is suggested to improve the quality of car seats.     

Evaluation of a new work seat for industrial sewing operations: results of three field studies

A newly developed work seat for industrial sewing operations was compared with a traditional sewing work seat to evaluate the effectiveness of design features. The new seat was designed with special seat-pan and backrest features to accommodate the musculoskeletal geometry of a low sit-stand posture. The seat-pan consisted of a pelvic support which supported the ischial tuberosities and areas behind them, and a thigh support which maintained the thighs at a 15 degrees downward angle, resulting in a 105 degrees trunk-thigh angle. The backrest consisted of a lumbar support which preserved lumbar lordosis and a thoracic support which supported the upper back during backward leaning. The traditional work seat was similar to an office chair (i e, a large horizontal seat-pan and a wide backrest) with the exception of having a higher than normal seat-height. This investigation consisted of three studies to compare the seats: (1) A user comfort and acceptance experiment which compared the initial psychophysical responses of 50 industrial sewers when introduced to the new seat; (2) a backrest usage experiment which compared the duration of backrest use among 10 industrial sewers; and (3) a follow-up experiment to evaluate chair preference after extended use of the new seat. The results of the user comfort and acceptance experiment found that the new work seat had greater comfort and user preference; the results of the backrest usage experiment found that the new seat had greater backrest use than the traditional seat; the results of the follow-up experiment found that the preference for the new seat was maintained over time and not due to a Hawthorne Effect.     

Background to sitting at work: research-based requirements for the design of work seats

The body's responses to sitting are complex and involve the anatomy and physiology of the sitter as well as the structure of the seat, the desk and the environment. In the light of recent research, the major reactions of the spine, the muscles and the spinal discs are discussed. Their interactions when adopting sitting postures are described. Reasons are given why certain sitting postures are to be preferred. The mechanisms that may give rise to muscle and disc damage, as well as back pain, as a result of adverse sitting postures are outlined. The design consequences of the research are then presented, showing how the seat shape arises from the previously described data. The influence of backrest design on sitting comfort and in the reduction of loading on the body is shown. Finally, a brief discussion of the influences from the work surface illustrates how the combination of seat and workplace can reduce the risks of injury by mitigating body loadings over the working day.     

Effects of seat slope and hip flexion on spinal angles in sitting

Lumbar and thoracic spinal angles of 25 male and 25 female subjects were measured in four sitting postures, with standing angles used as reference. Subjects sat with either 90 deg or 65 deg of hip flexion on either flat or forward-sloping seats. Lumbar kyphosis was greatest when the flat seat/90-deg posture was adopted and least when the sloping seat/65-deg posture was adopted. The opposite was observed for the thoracic angles, and intermediate results were observed for the other two sitting postures. No statistically significant interactions were observed among seat slope, hip flexion, and subject sex. The findings are discussed with reference to the anatomy of sitting and factors influencing pelvic tilt and the implications for the ergonomic design of chairs.     

AN ANALYSIS OF SOME FACTORS INFLUENCING SEAT COMFORT

Abstract

This study presents a re-analysis by correlation and factor analysis of data on the relative comfort of six Air Force pilot and crew seats. On the basis of the results obtained, the following conclusions may be drawn:

1. Seats are rated in the same relative order of comfort after only 5 min of sitting time has elapsed as after 4 or more hours of sitting on the seats.

2. People tend to rate the overall comfort of a seat mainly on the basis of the comfort of their backs and buttocks. The comfort of the neck and shoulders plays a secondary role while thigh und leg comfort seems to have little relationship to judgements of the overall comfort of a seat.

It was found that the following seven types of measurements wore measures of the same quantity, Overall Comfort of a, sent:

(a) Actual time a subject is willing to sit in a scat (up to a maximum of seven hours).

(b) Ratings of overall comfort after 5 min of sitting.

(c) Predictions of total time he would be willing to sit in the seat made after 5 min of sitting.

(d)Time of onset of first signs of discomfort.

(e)Ratings of overall comfort after 4 to 7 honrs of sitting.

(f)Comfort of the back.

(g)Comfort of the buttocks.     

The Influence of Various Seat Design Parameters: A Computational Analysis

Nowadays, low back pain becomes a common healthcare problem. Poor or unsuitable seat design is related to the discomfort and other healthcare problems of users. The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of seat design variables on the compressive loadings of lumbar joints. A basis that includes a musculoskeletal human body model and a chair model has been developed using LifeMOD Biomechanics Modeller. Inverse and forward dynamic simulations have been performed for various seat design parameters. The results show that the inclination of backrest and seat pan may or may not decrease the compressive spinal joint forces, depending on other conditions. The medium‐level height and depth of seat pan and the medium‐level and high‐level height of backrest are found to cause the minimum compressive loads on lumbar joints. This work contributes to a better understanding of sitting biomechanics and provides some useful guidelines for seat design.     

Effects of differences in office chair controls, seat and backrest angle design in relation to tasks

In this study the influence of chair characteristics on comfort, discomfort, adjustment time and seat interface pressure is investigated during VDU and non-VDU tasks: The two investigated office chairs, both designed according to European and Dutch standards are different regarding: 1) seat cushioning and shape, 2) backrest angle and 3) controls. Thirty subjects in total, both male and female, participated in two experiments: twenty in the first and ten in the second.Significant differences are found for ease of adjustment and adjustment time of controls, independent of the tasks. Related to tasks, a significant difference was found for the backrest range of motion. For non-VDU tasks a larger range of backrest motion was preferred by 70% of the subjects. The chair design differences were most clear for comfort and adjustment time of controls, followed by comfort of backrest angle. No differences are found between seat pan comfort and discomfort, first impressions and peak interface pressure.