The Charing Cross Hospital experience with temozolomide in patients with gliomas

Temozolomide, a new oral cytotoxic agent, was given to 75 patients with malignant gliomas. The schedule used was for the first course 150 mg/m2 per day for 5 days (i.e. total dose 750 mg/m2), escalating, if no significant myelosuppression was noted on day 22, to 200 mg/m2 per day for 5 days (i.e. total dose 1000 mg/m2) for subsequent courses at 4-week intervals. There were 27 patients with primary disease treated with two courses of temozolomide prior to their radiotherapy and 8 (30%) fulfilled the criteria for an objective response. There were 48 patients whose disease recurred after their initial surgery and radiotherapy and 12 (25%) fulfilled the criteria for an objective response. This gave an overall objective response rate of 20 (27%) out of 75 patients. Temozolomide was generally well tolerated, with little subjective toxicity and predictable myelosuppression. However, the responses induced with this schedule were of short duration and had relatively little impact on overall survival. In conclusion, temozolomide given in this schedule has activity against high grade glioma. However, studies evaluating chemotherapy in primary brain tumours should include a quality-of-life/performance status evaluation in addition to CT or MRI scanning assessment.     

Mineral waters: instead of soap or better than soap?

Prolonged oral etoposide is an active regimen in small and nonsmall cell carcinoma of the lung, carcinomas of the breast and ovary, germ cell tumors, and in lymphoma. A Phase II trial was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group to determine its activity in endometrial carcinoma. Twenty-six patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma were entered into study; one patient was ineligible because of an incorrect cell type. The remaining eligible patients were treated with etoposide at a starting dose of 50 mg/m2/day (30 mg/m2/day with prior radiotherapy) for 21 days. Based on hematologic toxicity, a dose escalation to a maximum dose of 60 mg/m2/day was prescribed. Twenty-two patients were evaluable for response and 25 were evaluable for toxicity. Fourteen had received prior radiotherapy and 24 had received prior chemotherapy. A median of two courses were given (range, 1-10). Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia occurring in 52% was the most common complication (grade 3, 36%; grade 4, 16%). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 16% of patients. There were no objective responses including four patients with serous papillary carcinoma. This regimen is not significantly active as second-line therapy in endometrial carcinoma.     

Phase I study of tauromustine administered in a weekly schedule

Tauromustine was administered orally in weekly doses with interindividual dose escalation to patients with disseminated malignant melanoma. The dose in the first cohort of 6 patients was 20 mg/m2/week. The dose escalation was 5 mg/m2/week. The limit of tolerance was 55 mg/m2/week. 99 patients completed at least 8 weeks of treatment and eight dose levels were evaluated for toxicity. Reversible thrombocytopenia, and to a lesser degree leukopenia, were dose limiting. From a starting dose of 40 mg/m2/week, the long-term tolerated dose was 35 mg/m2/week, thus achieving a considerable increase of dose intensity without a significant increase of toxicity by employing this weekly schedule of tauromustine.     

Five days of oral topotecan (Hycamtin), a phase I and pharmacological study in adult patients with solid tumours

Topotecan is a specific inhibitor to topoisomerase I. An oral formulation of topotecan is available with a bioavailability of 32-44% in humans. A phase I and pharmacological study of the oral formulation of topotecan administered daily for 5 days every 21 days was performed in adult patients with solid tumours to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Adult patients with a WHO performance status < or = 2 adequate haematological, hepatic and renal functions, with malignant solid tumours refractory to standard forms were entered into the study. Pharmacokinetics were performed on days 1 and 4 of the first course using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic assay. 29 patients entered the study, all patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. The doses studied in the 29 patients were 1.2, 1.8, 2.3, 2.7 mg/m2/day and a fixed dose of 4 mg/day without surface area adjustment. A total of 109 courses were given. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at a dose of 2.7 mg/m2/day and consisted of CTC (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria) grade IV granulocytopenia. The regimen was well tolerated. Non-haematological toxicities were mild, including fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. A significant correlation was observed between the percentage decrease in white blood cells versus the area under the curve (AUC(t)) of topotecan lactone (R = 0.76 P < 0.01) which was modelled by a sigmoidal Emax function. The correlation coefficient between the absolute topotecan dose administered and the AUC(t) was R = 0.52 (P = 0.04). Pharmacokinetics of the fixed dose of 4 mg/day were comparable to the 2.3 mg/m2/day dose. DLT in this phase I study of five daily doses of oral topotecan every 21 days was granulocytopenia. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 2.3 mg/m2/day or alternatively, a fixed dose of 4 mg/day.     

Preclinical and phase I clinical studies with the nonclassical antifolate thymidylate synthase inhibitor nolatrexed dihydrochloride given by prolonged administration in patients with solid tumors

PURPOSE: A phase I, multicenter trial of the thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitor THYMITAQ (nolatrexed dihydrochloride; Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA) given by 5-day continuous infusion was performed to establish the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to investigate pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor effects. METHODS: In vitro and in vivo preclinical studies demonstrated increased activity with prolonged nolatrexed exposure. In 32 patients, nolatrexed was given as a 5-day infusion at 96 to 1,040 mg/m2/d for 5 days. Pharmacokinetics were determined from high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses of plasma and urine. In addition to studying toxicity, plasma deoxyuridine (UdR) elevations were measured as a marker of TS inhibition. RESULTS: The MTD was 904 mg/m2/d for 5 days and the recommended phase II dose is 800 mg/m2/d for 5 days. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia with clinically significant thrombocytopenia and mucositis. These antiproliferative toxicities of nolatrexed were predictable and reversible. A partial response that lasted 3 months occurred in a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer. Pharmacokinetics were nonlinear, with the median plasma clearance (CI) decreasing from 151 mL/min/m2 (range, 124 to 211) at 96 mg/m2/d for 5 days to 49 mL/min/m2 (range, 30 to 84) at 768 mg/ m2/d for 5 days. The half-life (t1/2) was 173 minutes (range, 43 to 784) and 18% (range, 9% to 35%) of the dose was excreted unchanged in the urine. Plasma UdR increased, but returned to pretreatment levels after the end of infusion. Hematologic toxicity was significantly related to nolatrexed plasma concentrations and dose. CONCLUSION: Nolatrexed can be safely administered to patients at a dose of 800 mg/m2/d over 5 days by continuous intravenous infusion and this schedule is associated with antitumor effects. The phase II evaluation of nolatrexed is ongoing.     

MRI of hyperpolarized 3He gas in human paranasal sinuses

Relapsed or refractory adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) carries a grave prognosis. The most promising strategy for curing these patients is through re-induction chemotherapy followed by successful allogeneic transplant. We studied a new high-dose induction regimen in order to improve the outcome for these patients. Eighteen adult patients with relapsed/refractory ALL were treated on a phase I study of high-dose cytarabine combined with a single escalating dose of idarubicin. Five patients had primary refractory disease and 13 were treated in refractory relapse. Nine patients (50%) had Ph+ ALL. The induction regimen was cytarabine 3 g/m2/day intravenously days 1-5 and idarubicin as a single intravenous dose on day 3. G-CSF 5 microg/kg subcutaneously every 12 h was started on day 7. The initial idarubicin dose was 20 mg/m2 with dose escalations of 10 mg m2. Cohorts of three patients were treated at each idarubicin dose level. Unacceptable toxicity was encountered at 50 mg/m2 with one death from infection and one death from cardiotoxicity in a patient with significant prior anthracycline exposure. There were no instances of grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity encountered at idarubicin doses of 20 mg/m2, 30 mg/m2, or 40 mg/m2. The data suggest a dose-response relationship for increasing doses of idarubicin with 0/3 complete responses (CR) at 20 mg/m2, 1/3 CR at 30 mg/m2, and 7/12 (58%) CR at idarubicin doses > or = 40 mg/m2. We conclude that concomitant administration of cytarabine 3 g/m2/day x 5 and high-dose idarubicin at 40 mg/m2 as a single dose on day 3 can be administered safely to patients with refractory and relapsed ALL.     

A phase II study of carboplatin, cisplatin, interferon-alpha, and tamoxifen for patients with metastatic melanoma

The purpose of this trial was to determine the toxicity and antineoplastic activity of cisplatin, carboplatin, tamoxifen, and interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) in patients with advanced melanoma. Eleven patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled. The patients received carboplatin 400 mg/m2 i.v. on day 0; cisplatin 25 mg/m2 i.v. on days 7, 14, and 21; tamoxifen 20 mg p.o. b.i.d. on days 0-27; and interferon-alpha 5 million units/m2 subcutaneously 3 times per week. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Patients were assessed for tumor response at the end of 2 cycles. Toxicity was severe, with 14 of 24 cycles given requiring some form of dose reduction. Carboplatin dose reductions were related to bone-marrow toxicity, whereas IFN-alpha caused fatigue, arthralgias, myalgias, and fever. The overall response rate was 18% (2 partial responses [PRs]). The combination of cisplatin, carboplatin, tamoxifen, and IFN-alpha is active in advanced melanoma; however, the toxicity is unacceptable.     

Phosphatidyl serine-dependent antiprothrombin antibody is exclusive to patients with lupus anticoagulant

In attempt to develop a new chemotherapeutic regimen including carboplatin (CBDCA), epirubicin (EPI), and VP-16 in extensive small cell lung cancer, with a higher dose intensity compared with previous experience of our group, we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VP-16 when administered in association with CBDCA (300 mg/ m2, i.v., day 1) and EPI (75 mg/m2, i.v., day 1), recycling chemotherapy every 3 weeks, with the support of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). A total of 15 patients received three dose levels of VP-16 (mg/m2, i.v., daily on days 1-3): 100 (three patients), 120 (six), and 140 (six). G-CSF was administered subcutaneously at the dose of 5 micrograms/kg/day on days 6-15 of each chemotherapy course. The MTD was established at 140 mg/m2 and myelotoxicity, grade 4 neutropenia with death for sepsis in one case and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in three cases, was dose limiting. The recommended dose of VP-16 for a phase II study is 140 mg/m2.     

Randomized phase II trial of BCDT [carmustine (BCNU), cisplatin, dacarbazine (DTIC) and tamoxifen] with or without interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) and interleukin (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in a randomized phase II trial the efficacy and toxicity of combination biochemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic melanoma. Sixty-five patients with metastatic melanoma (ECOG performance status 0 or 1) were randomized to receive intravenous BCNU 100 mg m(-2) (day 1, alternate courses), cisplatin 25 mg m(-2) (days 1-3), DTIC 220 mg m(-2) (days 1-3) and oral tamoxifen 40 mg (BCDT regimen) with (n = 35) or without (n = 30) subcutaneous interleukin 2 (IL-2) 18 x 10(6) iu t.d.s. (day - 2), 9 x 10(6) iu b.d. (day - 1 and 0) and interferon 2 alpha (IFN-alpha) 9 MU (days 1-3). Evidence for immune activation was determined by flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood lymphocytes. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks up to six courses depending on response. The overall response rate of BCDT with IL-2/IFN-alpha was 23% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10-40%] with one complete response (CR) and seven partial responses (PR), and for BCDT alone 27% (95% CI 12-46%) with eight PRs; the median durations of response were 2.8 months and 2.5 months respectively. Sites of response were similar in both groups. There was no difference between the two groups in progression-free survival or overall survival (median survival 5 months for BCDT with IL-2/IFNalpha and 5.5 months for BCDT alone). Although 3 days of subcutaneous IL-2 resulted in significant lymphopenia, evidence of immune activation was indicated by a significant rise in the percentage of CD56- (NK cells) and CD3/HLA-DR-positive (activated T cells) subsets, without any change in the percentage of CD4 or CD4 T-cell subsets. Toxicity assessment revealed a significantly higher incidence of severe thrombocytopenia in patients treated with combination chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone (37% vs 13%, P = 0.03) and a higher incidence of grade 3/4 flu-like symptoms (20% vs 10%) and fatigue (26% vs 13%). The addition of subcutaneous IL-2 and IFNalpha to BCDT chemotherapy in a randomized phase II trial resulted in immune activation but did not improve response rates in patients with metastatic melanoma, and indeed may increase some treatment-related toxicity.     

Dacarbazine-vindesine versus dacarbazine-vindesine-cisplatin in disseminated malignant melanoma. A randomised phase III trial

In a multicentre phase III study of disseminated malignant melanoma performed in Sweden and Norway, 326 patients were randomised to receive treatment with the combination dacarbazine [DTIC] (D) and vindesine (V) with or without the addition of cisplatin (P). D was given intravenously (i.v.) at a dose of 250 mg/m2 days 1-5 every 4 weeks and V was given i.v. at a dose of 3.0 mg/m2 day 1 weekly. P was given i.v. at a dose of 100 mg/m2 day 1 every 4 weeks. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the treatment arms (P = 0.22). Increased toxicity was observed in the treatment arm containing P of which leucopenia, alopecia and nausea/vomiting were the most pronounced. The median time to progression was significantly longer in patients treated with DVP (4.2 versus 2.2 months, P = 0.007). In conclusion, adding P to DV did not change overall survival but did significantly increase toxicity.     

Phase I study of docetaxel dose escalation in combination with fixed weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose of monthly docetaxel combined with fixed-dose weekly gemcitabine and describe the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with refractory solid tumors were treated with gemcitabine days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks at a fixed dose of 800 mg/m2. Two docetaxel administration schedules were studied, with the drug administered either day 1 or day 15 at doses of 45, 60, 75, and 100 mg/m2 per cycle. RESULTS: Forty patients received 132 cycles of chemotherapy. On the day-1 schedule, the maximum-tolerated docetaxel dose was the highest planned dose of 100 mg/m2 with two DLT episodes among 12 patients treated with 34 cycles at this dose level. On the day-15 schedule, delivery of the planned docetaxel doses was not feasible because of thrombocytopenia and hepatic dysfunction. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia in 16 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia; grades 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia in nine patients; and anemia that required RBC transfusions in 10 patients. For patients treated at the highest docetaxel dose level, myelosuppression was not dose limiting and only one of 34 cycles was complicated by febrile neutropenia. The most common nonhematologic toxicities were asthenia, flu-like symptoms, and fluid retention. Antineoplastic activity was noteworthy, with partial responses in nine of 21 patients with pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 43%; 95% confidence interval, 22 to 66), in four of seven patients with breast cancer, and in one patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 days 1,8, and 15 can be safely combined with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 day 1 of a 28-day cycle. The observed antitumor activity warrants phase II evaluation.     

Phase I study of UFT plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: a double modulation proposal

Twenty-six patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with UFT and leucovorin (LV). On day 1, patients received LV 500 mg/m2 in IV infusion, followed by 15 mg/12 h for 13 days. On days 1 to 14, patients took oral UFT twice daily. Three cycles were given every 28 days, unless grade III-IV toxicity appeared. The initial dose of UFT (200 mg/day) was increased until 800 mg/day. Dose limiting toxicities were stomatitis, diarrhea and epigastralgia. The maximum tolerated dose of UFT was 390 +/- 10 mg/m2. Three out of 24 evaluable patients achieved a partial response and 1 a complete response with UFT doses of 260 to 390 mg/m2. These results warrant confirmation in phase II studies.     

Clinical evaluation of Asaley

Asaley is an L-leucine derivative of sarcolysin which is more active against some rodent tumors. Studies in the USSR demonstrated activity in patients with ovarian and breast carcinoma, Hodgkin's disease, and multiple myeloma. This study in 73 evaluable patients indicated that an appropriate oral dose for patients with adequate bone marrow is 800 mg/M2/day X 4 days at 5-6 week intervals. The most common toxicities were myelosuppression, nausea, and vomiting. Antitumor activity was observed in 2 of 24 evaluable patients with melanoma, and stabilization of previously progressive disease was observed in patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon, multiple myeloma, lymphoma, breast carcinoma, and thyroid carcinoma. Responses were minimal and of short duration but most of the patients had received extensive prior therapy.     

Variability in the oral bioavailability of all-trans-retinoic acid

BACKGROUND: Orally administered all-trans-retinoic acid (all-trans-RA) can induce complete remission in a high proportion of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. A previous pharmacokinetic study in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia raised the possibility that the absorption of orally administered all-trans-RA is a saturable process that would have significant clinical impact on dosing strategies. PURPOSE: This study was specifically designed to examine the saturability of all-trans-RA absorption by measuring the effect of doubling the oral dose of all-trans-RA on plasma drug concentration in patients receiving long-term oral therapy. METHODS: Six patients with solid tumors received oral doses of 10-mg gelatin capsules of all-trans-RA. Patients were studied on 2 consecutive days after they received 28 days of all-trans-RA administered as two daily 78-mg/m2 doses. The study assigned the patients to two groups. Three patients took a 156-mg/m2 dose on day 28 and a 78-mg/m2 dose on day 29; the other three patients took the lower dose on day 28 and the double dose on day 29. Blood samples for the determination of all-trans-RA plasma concentration were obtained at 30-minute intervals starting just prior to drug administration and continuing for a total of 7 hours. The plasma concentration of all-trans-RA was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations following an oral dose of all-trans-RA were highly variable, with peak concentrations ranging from 0.07 to 1.2 microM for the 78-mg/m2 dose level. Doubling the dose from 78 to 156 mg/m2 increased plasma concentration in all six patients, but the increase was unpredictable and not related to dose, ranging from less than a 1.2-fold to more than a 10-fold increase. CONCLUSION: The current study does not support the hypothesis that the gastrointestinal absorption of all-trans-RA involves a saturable process but instead suggests that absorption is highly variable among patients. This wide interpatient variability suggests that pharmacokinetic drug monitoring may have an important role in the management of patients receiving all-trans-RA.     

Phase I study of daily times five topotecan and single injection of cisplatin in patients with previously untreated non-small-cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objectives were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity of topotecan in combination with cisplatin, to describe the principal toxicities, and to define the maximally-tolerated doses of the drugs in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was designed to evaluate escalated doses of topotecan (starting at 0.75 mg/m2/day) as a 30-minute infusion daily for five consecutive days with a fixed clinically-relevant dose of 75 mg/m2 cisplatin given on day 1, every three weeks. RESULTS: Fifteen chemotherapy-naive patients entered the study and 14 were evaluable for toxicity. All 11 patients treated at the first topotecan/cisplatin dose level of 0.75/75 mg/m2, experienced at least one episode of grade 4 neutropenia. For six patients, absolute neutrophil counts were below 500/ml for more than five days, and two of them developed a grade 4 thrombocytopenia. At the next higher topotecan/cisplatin dose level (1.0/75 mg/m2), grade 4 neutropenia lasting longer than five days occurred in all three evaluable patients, including one patient who expired due to a severe neutropenia associated with sepsis. Non-hematologic toxicities, predominantly nausea and vomiting, were mild to moderate in severity and manageable. Four patients had partial responses (30.7%; 95% confidence interval (9%-61%) of relatively short duration. CONCLUSION: Both severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia precluded dose escalation of topotecan and cisplatin administered on this schedule. In previously untreated patients, the first topotecan/cisplatin dose level (0.75/75 mg/m2), was associated with intolerable myelosuppression, and, therefore, the dose levels evaluated in this study cannot be recommended for subsequent phase II investigations. The high toxicity of this schedule and the recent understanding of the pharmacokinetic interaction between those drugs may encourage the investigation of the alternate sequence of cisplatin after TPT in phase II studies.     

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the oral platinum analogue JM216 given daily for 14 days

BACKGROUND: The oral bis (acetate) ammine dichloro cyclohexylamine platinum (IV) analogue (BMS-182751) was brought into clinical development because it was shown to be cytotoxic against some human tumour cell lines and to have an antitumor activity in murine tumours at least comparable to that of parenteral cisplatin and carboplatin. In early clinical studies in which the optimal schedule of treatment was daily for five consecutive days, dose-dependent nausea and vomiting occurred in about two-thirds of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To evaluate if the use of lower daily doses for longer periods of time could result in a better tolerability, JM216 was given once daily for 14 consecutive days every four to five weeks to adult patients with solid tumors. Oral antiemetics were given prophylactically only at the highest doses. The pharmacokinetics of total and ultrafiltrable platinum were studied on days 1 and 14 of the first cycle by Inductively Coupled-Mass-Spectrometry (ICP-MS). RESULTS: Forty-six patients were treated at doses ranging from 10 mg/m2/d to 50 mg/m2/d and 39 were evaluable for hematologic toxicity over 74 cycles. MTDs were reached at 45 mg/m2/d and 50 mg/m2/d x 14 repeated every five weeks in patients with extensive, or limited/no prior treatment, respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia which was delayed and variable among patients. Other non-hematological toxicities were severe vomiting (22% of cycles), diarrhea (28% of cycles) and drug-associated fever (32% of patients), controlled with paracetamol. Subjective improvement with disappearance of tumour-related pain was observed in one patient with chemotherapy-resistant metastatic prostate cancer and in one previously untreated patient with malignant mesothelioma. Cmax and AUC values of both total and ultrafiltrable platinum on days 1 and 14 were highly variable among patients. Only Cmax on day 1 was linearly related to the dose. Total and ultrafiltrable platinum were still detectable two weeks after the last dose. No relationship could be established between AUC values and toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Daily doses of JM216 of 40 mg/m2 and 45 mg/m2 for 14 consecutive days every five weeks with oral antiemetic prophylaxis are selected for phase II evaluation of single agent in patients with extensive or limited/no prior treatment, respectively. The administration of JM216 on a day x 14 schedule produced nausea and vomiting comparable to that observed with the day x 5 regimen but of longer duration. The variability of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, even though limited at the doses proposed for phase II evaluation of JM216 as single agent, recommend a careful monitoring of the patients.     

Oviposition and incubation environmental effects on embryonic diapause in a ground cricket

PURPOSE: Recent studies document the value of early combined modality therapy of small cell lung cancer, but also indicate that early thoracic radiation adds to myelosuppression and can complicate further chemotherapy. Other studies indicate that simultaneous use of growth factors with thoracic radiation may be deleterious. However, temporal separation of growth factor use from cytotoxic therapy may allow dose intensity to be maintained/enhanced during combined modality treatment. We sought to integrate filgrastim into a novel chemoradiation regimen for patients with limited small cell lung cancer using an approach that separated growth factor administration from both chemotherapy and thoracic radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-seven patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a Phase I trial of cisplatin, ifosfamide/mesna, oral etoposide, and thoracic radiation (1.5 Gy b.i.d. x 30 fractions days 1-19 cycle 1) +/- filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day). Filgrastim was given on days 20-25 of cycle 1 after completion of radiation and following completion of oral etoposide in subsequent cycles. The primary end point was determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of chemotherapy. Serial cohorts were treated with and without filgrastim. RESULTS: Because of dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, primarily, and nonhematologic toxicity, the MTDs with and without filgrastim were identical (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v., both given days 1-3, and etoposide 40 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14). Filgrastim use shortened the duration of neutropenia at the MTD (median 4 vs. 7 days), but was not associated with a reduction in febrile neutropenia. Although growth factor administration did not allow dose escalation of this regimen, it did allow chemotherapy doses to be maintained at the MTD more frequently through four cycles of therapy. In the 24 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 100% (71% partial and 29% complete). CONCLUSIONS: Despite careful attention to the timing of growth factor with chemoradiation, the administration of filgrastim with this regimen did not allow dose escalation. As in many other recent studies of hematopoietic growth factors given prophylactically with chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia at the MTD was shortened and the need for dose reduction throughout treatment was reduced in patients receiving filgrastim at the MTD.     

Multiple resistance modulators combined with carboplatin for resistant malignancies: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy resistance is probably multifactorial; hence, we assessed the feasibility of adding to carboplatin 6 concurrent resistance modulators in 53 patients with resistant cancers. METHODS: Pentoxifylline and dipyridamole were added to carboplatin 400 mg/m2 in cohort 1, and metronidazole was also given in cohort 2. Mannitol and saline were administered in each cohort with the theoretical objective of improving carboplatin delivery to tumors by reducing blood viscosity. Because of excessive toxicity in cohort 2, cohort 3 received the same modulators as in cohort 2 but with a reduced dose of carboplatin (200 mg/m2). Subsequent patients had the following drugs added to those in the previous cohort: novobiocin (cohort 4), tamoxifen (cohort 5), ketoconazole (cohort 6). Cohort 7 patients received the 6 cohort 6 modulators along with carboplatin 300 mg/m2. RESULTS: Thrombocytopenia was excessive in early cohorts with a carboplatin dose of 400 mg/m2, but was minimal at lower doses. Other toxicity was generally tolerable and reversible, particularly at carboplatin doses < or = 300 mg/m2, although gastrointestinal and neurological toxicity tended to worsen as additional modulators were added. No major responses (but 4 minor responses) were seen in this patient population with heavily pretreated or primarily resistant cancers. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable doses for phase II studies are carboplatin 300 mg/m2, 20% mannitol 250 ml plus normal saline 500 ml over 1 hr prior to carboplatin, pentoxifylline 700 mg/m2/day p.o. from 3 days before carboplatin to cessation of therapy, dipyridamole 100 mg/m2 p.o. q6h x 6 days starting 24 hr before carboplatin, metronidazole (750 mg/m2 p.o. 12 hr and immediately before, and 24 hr after carboplatin; 250 mg/m2 suppository p.r. 12 hr and immediately before, and 6 and 24 hr after carboplatin; and 500 mg/m2 i.v. right after carboplatin), novobiocin 600 mg/m2 p.o. q12h x 6 days starting 24 hr before carboplatin, and tamoxifen 100 mg/m2/day plus ketoconazole 700 mg/m2/day x 3 days starting the day before carboplatin, with oral dexamethasone and ondansetron as antimetics.     

A phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the new topoisomerase inhibitor GI147211 given as a 72-h continuous infusion

GI147211 is a novel, totally synthetic camptothecin with promising preclinical and early clinical activity. This study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of Gl147211 as a 72-h infusion and to describe its pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics on this schedule. In a single-arm, rising-dose study in patients with advanced cancer, eight cohorts of three or more patients received 72-h infusions of Gl147211 at doses ranging from 0.25 to 2.5 mg m(-2) day(-1). Forty-four patients received a total of 124 cycles. All patients had refractory tumours and 40 had received prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Whole-blood Gl147211 lactone, total blood and total concentrations were measured during and over the 12 h following the infusion. Myelosuppression was observed at all dose levels. Neutropenia was dose limiting at 2.0 mg m(-2) day(-1) in minimally pretreated patients, while both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were limiting at 1.5 mg m(-2) day(-1) in those more heavily pretreated. Phlebitis occurred with infusions through peripheral veins early in this study, necessitating the use of central venous access. Other toxicities included mild nausea and vomiting, fatigue, headache, central venous catheter infections and alopecia. Three partial and two minor responses lasting 8-34+ weeks were noted in patients with ovarian, colon and breast carcinomas and hepatoma. Mean steady-state concentrations of Gl147211 increased with dose over a range of 0.25-1.24 ng ml(-1). The mean terminal elimination half-life was 7.5 h, and the clearance averaged 1074 ml min(-1) m(-2) over the doses studied. The mean fractional excretion of unchanged drug in urine was 0.114. Gl147211 lactone exposure correlated with haematological toxicity. The recommended phase II doses for this regimen are 1.75 mg m(-2) day(-1) and 1.2 mg m(-2) day(-1) for minimally pretreated and heavily pretreated patients respectively. At these doses, steady-state Gl147211 concentrations within the range of those effective in vitro were achieved. Extensive phase II evaluation of this compound and further phase I trials evaluating more prolonged infusions are ongoing.     

Phase I study of the antipurine antifolate lometrexol (DDATHF) with folinic acid rescue

Lometrexol (5,10-dideazatetrahydrofolic acid) is a new antifolate that is highly selective in inhibiting the key enzyme of purine synthesis glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. The most promising preclinical features of lometrexol in animal models were its significant activity against a broad panel of solid tumors, the schedule dependency of its antitumor activity, and the availability of a rescue regimen with folinic or folic acid. In the present study, lometrexol was first given daily for 3 consecutive days, repeated every 4 weeks (part I). The occurrence of delayed myelotoxicity prompted the development of a rescue regimen with lometrexol given in a single dose on day 1, followed by oral folinic acid, 15 mg four times a day, from day 3 to day 5 (part II). Longer time intervals between administration of lometrexol and start of rescue were then evaluated (part III), and in the last part of the study (part IV), the maximum tolerated dose of single intermittent doses of lometrexol with folinic acid given from day 7 to day 9 was established. Sixty adult patients entered the study. In part I, the highest daily dose that could be safely given was 4 mg/m2, for a total dose of 12 mg/m2. Cumulative early stomatitis and delayed thrombocytopenia were dose limiting. The use of oral folinic acid made it possible to escalate the dose up to 60 mg/m2, and the maximum tolerated dose was reached at this dose when folinic was given from day 7 to day 9, with anemia being the dose-limiting toxicity. A shorter time interval between lometrexol and folinic acid administrations (from day 5 to day 7) is recommended for Phase II evaluations to optimize the antitumor effect. Anemia was normochromic and macrocytic, possibly due to a deficiency of folic acid. One partial response of 8 months' duration was reported in a patient with epithelial cancer of the ovary, relapsing after cisplatin and alkylating agents. The use of folic acid as rescue, proposed on the basis of experimental data and pharmacological considerations, has also allowed the repeated administration of lometrexol at doses higher than in the previous studies. The advantages of rescue with folinic acid over supplementation with folic acid, however, are difficult to define.