Amygdala efferents mediating electrically evoked startle-like responses and fear potentiation of acoustic startle.

One-pulse stimulation of the ventral amygdalofugal pathway (VAF), ventrolateral midbrain, or medial medulla evoked startle-like responses. Refractory periods tested by 2-pulse stimulation ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 msec in both midbrain and medulla sites and from 0.4 to 0.8 msec in VAF sites. Symmetric collision effects between midbrain and medulla sites suggest that fast-conducting axons between the sites mediate the response. Asymmetric collision effects between VAF and midbrain suggest that strong synapses between these sites mediate the response, with a transmission time of 1 msec. No collision was observed between contralateral sites. Bilateral lesions of midbrain sites blocked VAF responses and fear-conditioned startle, but failed to block acoustic startle, and partially blocked medulla responses. A new neural model of fear-potentiated startle is proposed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The CCKB antagonist, L-365,260, attenuates fear-potentiated startle

The neuropeptide cholecystokinin (CCK), via the CCKB receptor, increases behaviors associated with anxiety in laboratory animals and humans. The present experiment assessed the role of endogenous CCKB function in fear-potentiated startle, a test of "anxiety" in rats. The amplitude of the acoustic startle response is potentiated if preceded by a stimulus that has been previously paired with shock. Pretreatment with the CCKB antagonist L-365,260 (0, 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mg/kg, IP) did not affect baseline acoustic startle amplitudes, but dose-dependently decreased fear-potentiated startle. These results indicate that the specific attenuation of fear-potentiated startle induced by L-365,260 was not due to a general decrease in motor responsivity. The present findings are consistent with the effects of CCKB antagonists in other tests measuring anxiety in animals.     

Fear-potentiated startle in two strains of inbred mice.

The fear-potentiated startle paradigm has been used with great success to examine conditioned fear in both rats and humans. The purpose of this study was to examine fear-potentiated startle in inbred mice. One-month-old C57BL/6J (C57) and DBA/2J (DBA) mice were given tone?+?foot shock training trials. The amplitude of the acoustic startle reflex was measured in the presence and absence of the tone both before and after training. Both strains showed fear-potentiated startle after training as evidenced by larger startle amplitudes in the presence of the tone than in its absence. However, the magnitude of fear-potentiated startle was greater in DBA mice than in C57 mice. These results not only demonstrate fear-potentiated startle in mice for the first time but also suggest that fear-potentiated startle can be influenced by characteristics of the mouse strain. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Involvement of the dorsal periaqueductal gray in the loss of fear-potentiated startle accompanying high footshock training.

The amplitude of acoustic startle is markedly enhanced by cues signaling moderately intense footshocks but, surprisingly, not by cues signaling higher intensity footshocks. Previous findings suggest that the ineffectiveness of high footshock training may involve activation of the dorsal periaqueductal gray (PAG). As a means of evaluating this possibility, rats trained with moderate (0.6 mA) footshocks were later tested after intra-PAG infusion of an excitatory nontoxic dose of kainic acid. Kainic acid significantly reduced fear-potentiated startle relative to vehicle controls. In a 2nd experiment, the effect of dorsal PAG lesions on fear-potentiated startle to cues paired with 0.6-mA and 1.6-mA footshocks was evaluated. Dorsal PAG lesions prevented the disruptive effects of high footshock training. Together, these results suggest that dorsal PAG activation mediates the loss of potentiated startle accompanying high footshock training. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Muscimol in the deep layers of the superior colliculus/mesencephalic reticular formation blocks expression but not acquisition of fear-potentiated startle in rats.

Deposits of the retrograde tracer Fluoro-Gold into the ventrolateral nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis labeled neurons in the deep layers of the superior colliculus/mesencephalic reticular formation (deep SC/Me). To test the involvement of this area in the fear-potentiated startle effect, rats were implanted with cannulas into the deep SC/Me and trained for fear-potentiated startle after infusion of the GABAA agonist muscimol (0.1 μg/0.5 μl). Two days later, they were tested for fear-potentiated startle. Rats then received a 2nd training session without any infusions, and 2 days later they were reinfused with muscimol (0.1 μg/0.5 μl) and tested for fear-potentiated startle. Local infusion of muscimol into the deep SC/Me completely blocked the expression but not the acquisition of fear-potentiated startle. These results indicate that a synapse in the midbrain is critical for the expression of fear-potentiated startle. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Pharmacological and anatomical analysis of fear conditioning using the fear-potentiated startle paradigm.

Pharmacological and anatomical analyses of fear conditioning using the fear-potentiated startle paradigm are reviewed. This test measures conditioned fear by an increase in the amplitude of a simple reflex (the acoustic startle reflex) in the presence of a cue previously paired with a shock. This paradigm offers a number of advantages as an alternative to most animal tests of fear or anxiety because it involves no operant and is reflected by an enhancement rather than a suppression of ongoing behavior. Fear-potentiated startle is selectively decreased by drugs such as diazepam, morphine, and buspirone that reduce fear or anxiety clinically. By combining behavioral, anatomical, physiological, and pharmacological approaches, it should soon be possible to determine each neural pathway that is required for a stimulus signaling fear to alter startle behavior. Once the exact structures are delineated, it should be possible to determine the neurotransmitters that are released during a state of fear and how this chemical information is relayed along these pathways so as to affect behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Evidence of contextual fear after lesions of the hippocampus: a disruption of freezing but not fear-potentiated startle

The roles of the dorsal hippocampus and the central nucleus of the amygdala in the expression of contextual fear were assessed using two measures of conditioned fear: freezing and fear-potentiated startle. A discriminable context conditioning paradigm was developed that demonstrated both conditioned freezing and fear-potentiated startle in a context paired previously with foot shock, relative to a context in which foot shock had never been presented. Post-training lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala completely blocked both contextual freezing and fear-potentiated startle. Post-training lesions of the dorsal hippocampus attenuated contextual freezing, consistent with previous reports in the literature; however, these same lesions had no effect on fear-potentiated startle, suggesting preserved contextual fear. These results suggest that lesions of the hippocampus disrupt the freezing response but not contextual fear itself.     

Delayed development of fear-potentiated startle in rats.

Examined the developmental emergence of fear-potentiated startle in rats ranging in age from 16 to 75 days. In Exp 1, a pure tone served as the CS and an acoustic startle pulse served as the unconditioned stimulus (UCS) for fear conditioning. Fear-potentiated startle by the tone CS was observed in rats 23 days of age and older but not in rats 16 days of age. In Exp 2, a light served as the CS. Rats 30 days of age and older showed fear-potentiated startle, whereas 23-day-old rats did not. The final experiment demonstrated that another behavioral index of fear, stimulus-elicited freezing, was observed earlier in development than fear-potentiated startle, confirming the effectiveness of the training procedure for conditioning fear. Results suggest that fear-potentiated startle is a relatively late-emerging response system, parallelling the development of conditioned autonomic changes (e.g., heart rate) rather than that of freezing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Electrolytic lesions of the amygdala block acquisition and expression of fear-potentiated startle even with extensive training but do not prevent reacquisition.

Lesions of the amygdala have been shown to block the expression of fear-potentiated startle (increased acoustic startle in the presence of a cue previously paired with shock). In the present study, bilateral lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala given after extensive training totally blocked the expression of fear-potentiated startle but did not prevent reacquisition. In contrast, when the lesions were made before any training, the lesioned rats did not show potentiated startle even with extensive training. Thus, the central nucleus of the amygdala normally seems to be required for the initial acquisition and expression of potentiated startle regardless of the degree of learning. However, reacquisition of potentiated startle can occur without the central nucleus, which implies the presence of a secondary brain system that can compensate for the loss of the central nucleus of the amygdala under some circumstances. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

N-methyl-D-aspartate lesions of the lateral and basolateral nuclei of the amygdaloid block fear-potentiated startle and shock sensitization of startle.

Destroyed cell bodies in the lateral and basolateral amygdaloid nuclei by local infusion of N-methyl-{d}-aspartate. Adjacent areas, such as the central amygdaloid nucleus, were largely spared. Lesions were carried out before training and testing (Exp 1) or after training but before testing (Exp 2). In both cases, the lesions completely blocked fear-potentiated startle (increased acoustic startle in the presence of a light previously paired with footshock). They also blocked increased startle after a series of footshocks, provided they damaged the most anterior part of the basolateral nucleus. It is suggested that the lateral or basolateral amygdaloid nuclei (or both) relay visual information to the central amygdaloid nucleus, which is also critical for fear-potentiated startle. In addition, activation of the most anterior part of the basolateral nucleus may be critical for processing shock information during fear conditioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Double dissociation between the involvement of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and the central nucleus of the amygdala in startle increases produced by conditioned versus unconditioned fear

The amplitude of the acoustic startle response is reliably enhanced when elicited in the presence of bright light (light-enhanced startle) or in the presence of cues previously paired with shock (fear-potentiated startle). Light-enhanced startle appears to reflect an unconditioned response to an anxiogenic stimulus, whereas fear-potentiated startle reflects a conditioned response to a fear-eliciting stimulus. We examine the involvement of the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala, the central nucleus of the amygdala, and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in both phenomena. Immediately before light-enhanced or fear-potentiated startle testing, rats received intracranial infusions of the AMPA receptor antagonist 2, 3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulphamoylbenzo(F)-quinoxaline (3 microg) or PBS. Infusions into the central nucleus of the amygdala blocked fear-potentiated but not light-enhanced startle, and infusions into the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis blocked light-enhanced but not fear-potentiated startle. Infusions into the basolateral amygdala disrupted both phenomena. These findings indicate that the neuroanatomical substrates of fear-potentiated and light-enhanced startle, and perhaps more generally of conditioned and unconditioned fear, may be anatomically dissociated.     

Cocaine enhances the expression of fear-potentiated startle: Evaluation of state-dependent extinction and the shock-sensitization of acoustic startle.

Cocaine's effects on fear extinction and on the shock-sensitization of acoustic startle were examined. Following fear acquisition, rats exposed to the nonreinforced CS after cocaine administration demonstrated significant levels of fear-potentiated startle when evaluated in the drug-free state. The CS also increased startle amplitudes in subjects extinguished and tested with cocaine, indicating that mechanisms other than state-dependent learning are involved in the extinction deficit. The presentation of 10 footshocks augmented acoustic startle, and the shock enhancement was unaffected by cocaine preexposure. These data indicate that the aversive consequences of footshock relevant to the acquisition of conditional fear are not sensitized by the drug. It was suggested that cocaine reinforces fear responding to a threatening stimulus. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Lesions of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis block sensitization of the acoustic startle reflex produced by repeated stress, but not fear-potentiated startle

1. The effects of lesions of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST) on the acquisition of conditioned fear were examined. In Experiment 1, BST lesions did not block acquisition of fear-potentiated startle to an explicit visual conditioned stimulus (CS) over 20 days of training. However, BST lesions blocked a gradual elevation in baseline startle also seen over the course of training. 2. The gradual increase in baseline startle was replicated in Experiment 2 without the presence of an explicit CS, using unoperated subjects. Experiment 2 showed that the elevation was due to repetitive exposure to shock, because unshocked control subjects did not show any elevation over sessions. 3. In Experiment 3, lesions of the BST did not disrupt rapid sensitization of the startle reflex by footshock, showing that different neural substrates underlie sensitization of startle by acute and chronic exposure to footshock. 4. These data indicate that the BST, despite its anatomical continuity with the amygdala, is not critically involved in the acquisition of conditioned fear to an explicit CS. Nevertheless, the BST is involved in mediating a stress-induced elevation in the startle reflex. This suggests that the BST and the CeA, which constitute part of the "extended amygdala" have complementary roles in responses to stress.     

Posttraining lesions of the amygdala interfere with fear-potentiated startle to both visual and auditory conditioned stimuli in C57BL/6J mice.

The fear-potentiated startle paradigm has been used with great success to examine conditioned fear in both rats and humans. The purpose of the present experiment was to extend the authors' previous findings and further validate the fear-potentiated startle paradigm in mice. In Experiments 1 and 2, C57BL/6J mice were given Pavlovian fear conditioning with either an auditory or a visual conditioned stimulus. Similar to data collected with rats, fear-potentiated startle was observed for both stimulus modalities. In Experiment 3, posttraining lesions of the amygdala disrupted fear-potentiated startle in both conditioned stimulus modalities. These data are consistent with amygdala lesion studies in rats and suggest that fear-potentiated startle in mice requires an intact amygdala. Together, these results extend the authors' previous results and provide the basis for using this well-understood behavioral paradigm for examining the molecular mechanisms of conditioned fear in transgenic and knockout mice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Contribution of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons to expression of conditional fear: Effects of electrical stimulation, excitotoxin lesions, and quinpirole infusion on potentiated startle in rats.

Potentiated startle was used in this study to determine the fear-motivational functions of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in rats. In Experiment 1, electrical stimulation of the VTA increased acoustic startle amplitudes. In subsequent experiments fear-potentiated startle was assessed following axon-sparing N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) lesions of the VTA and after bilateral intra-VTA infusion of the dopamine (DA) D2/3 receptor agonist quinpirole. The NMDA lesions produced substantial cell loss in the medial ventral tegmentum and suppressed fear expression. Similarly, inhibition of DA neuronal activity associated with locally administered quinpirole blocked fear-potentiated startle. It was suggested that VTA neurons and their forebrain DA projections regulate levels of aversive emotional arousal within the amygdala-based fear system. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Lack of a temporal gradient of retrograde amnesia in rats with amygdala lesions assessed with the fear-potentiated startle paradigm.

It is well known that lesions of the hippocampal formation produce a temporally graded retrograde amnesia for certain types of memory. A similar pattern of results has been reported with amygdaloid lesions in avoidance learning (K. C. Liang et al, 1982). The present study examined the effects of posttraining amygdaloid lesions using a Pavlovian conditioning task, fear-potentiated startle, in which the amplitude of the acoustic startle reflex is increased when elicited in the presence of a cue (e.g., a light) previously paired with footshock. Electrolytic lesions of the amygdala given either 6 or 30 days after training blocked the expression of potentiated startle, indicating no temporal gradient of amnesia over these intervals in this test paradigm. The effects of amygdaloid lesions on different measures of aversive learning are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Lesions of the central nucleus of the amygdala block conditioned excitation, but not conditioned inhibition of fear as measured with the fear-potentiated startle effect.

Lesions of the amygdala block the expression of fear-potentiated startle following either moderate or extensive light?+?shock training. The present experiment assessed whether lesions of the amygdala would also block the expression of conditioned inhibition of fear. Rats were given conditioned inhibition training in which a light was paired with shock and a noise and light compound was presented in the absence of shock. Then half of the rats were given bilateral electrolytic lesions of the amygdala and the remaining rats were sham operated. Lesions of the amygdala blocked the expression of fear-potentiated startle to the light. To assess whether conditioned inhibition was disrupted, rats were retrained with light?+?shock pairings with no further conditioned inhibition training. Amygdala lesioned rats reacquired fear-potentiated startle to the light (Kim & Davis, 1993). Importantly, the noise conditioned inhibitor retained its ability to inhibit fear-potentiated startle to the retrained light. These results indicate that areas of the amygdala critical for initial performance of fear-potentiated startle are not critical for the expression of conditioned inhibition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Involvement of NMDA receptors within the amygdala in short- versus long-term memory for fear conditioning as assessed with fear-potentiated startle.

Pretraining intra-amygdala infusions of the NMDA receptor antagonist, D,L-AP5, block fear-potentiated startle in rats tested 24+ hr after training. This may reflect a failure of either acquisition or retention. To evaluate these alternatives, rats were tested for fear-potentiated startle during fear conditioning (30 light-shock pairings [0.6 mA shock]), as well as 1–30 min and 48 hr after fear conditioning. Amygdala lesions abolishes fear-potentiated startle at all train-test intervals. Intra-amygdala AP5 infusions (25 nmol/side) abolished fear-potentiated startle during the long-term test and had partial effects at shorter train-test intervals. When the level of fear-potentiated startle during the short-term test was lowered to that of the 48-hr test (i.e., by training rats with a lower, 0.3 mA footshock), AP5 abolished fear-potentiated startle at each timepoint. Thus, amygdala NMDA receptors appear to participate in the initial acquisition of fear memories. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Normal conditioning inhibition and extinction of freezing and fear-potentiated startle following electrolytic lesions of medial prefrontal cortex in rats.

The authors investigated the role of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in the inhibition of conditioned fear in rats using both Pavlovian extinction and conditioned inhibition paradigms. In Experiment 1, lesions of ventral mPFC did not interfere with conditioned inhibition of the fear-potentiated startle response. In Experiment 2, lesions made after acquisition of fear conditioning did not retard extinction of fear to a visual conditioned stimulus (CS) and did not impair "reinstatement" of fear after unsignaled presentations of the unconditioned stimulus. In Experiment 3, lesions made before fear conditioning did not retard extinction of fear-potentiated startle or freezing to an auditory CS. In both Experiments 2 and 3, extinction of fear to contextual cues was also unaffected by the lesions. These results indicate that ventral mPFC is not essential for the inhibition of fear under a variety of circumstances. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Affective individual differences and startle reflex modulation.

Potentiation of startle has been demonstrated in experimentally produced aversive emotional states, and clinical reports suggest that potentiated startle may be associated with fear or anxiety. To test the generalizability of startle potentiation across a variety of emotional states as well as its sensitivity to individual differences in fearfulness, the acoustic startle response of 17 high- and 15 low-fear adult Ss was assessed during fear, anger, joy, sadness, pleasant relaxation, and neutral imagery. Startle responses were larger in all aversive affective states than during pleasant imagery. This effect was enhanced among high fear Ss, although follow-up testing indicated that other affective individual differences (depression and anger) may also be related to increased potentiation of startle in negative affect. Startle latency was reduced during high- rather than low-arousal imagery but was unaffected by emotional valence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)