Is Barrett's esophagus characterized by more pronounced acid reflux than severe esophagitis?

OBJECTIVE: Barrett's esophagus is related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, only a small fraction of patients with GERD develop Barrett's esophagus. We evaluated whether gastroesophageal acid reflux is more pronounced in Barrett's patients than in patients with moderate or severe endoscopic esophagitis. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of results of esophageal manometry and 24 hour ambulatory pH monitoring performed between 1990 and 1996 at the Leiden University Medical Center in those patients who also underwent endoscopy < or = 3 months before pH-metry. Included were 51 patients with Barrett's esophagus, 30 patients with severe esophagitis, 45 patients with moderate esophagitis, and 24 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Patients with Barrett's esophagus had significantly increased acid reflux time (p < 0.01-0.05) compared to patients with moderate, but not compared to patients with severe esophagitis. Distal esophageal body motility and LES pressure were significantly (p < 0.01-0.05) reduced in patients with Barrett's esophagus compared to patients with moderate esophagitis but not compared to those with severe esophagitis. CONCLUSION: Although acid reflux is increased in patients with Barrett's esophagus and esophageal motility is impaired, other factors apart from acid exposure and motility contribute to the development of Barrett's esophagus.     

Characteristic expression of 105-kDa heat shock protein (HSP105) in various tissues of nonstressed and heat-stressed rats

BACKGROUND: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the major mechanism permitting gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Little information is available on how anti-reflux surgery affects reflux mechanisms, especially TLESRs. We evaluated the effects of partial fundoplication (Belsey Mark IV) on reflux mechanisms. METHODS: Sixteen patients were prospectively studied before and after Belsey Mark-IV operation by endoscopy, 24-h esophageal pH-metry, and simultaneous recording of pH and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics by sleeve manometry. RESULTS: The operation was successful in 14 of 16 patients (87%). Fasting and postprandial reflux decreased significantly (P < 0.01) after the operation. Partial fundoplication significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the number of TLESRs per hour in the fasting and postprandial period from 3.2+/-0.4 and 5.6+/-0.5 to 1.7+/-0.3 and 2.8+/-0.4, respectively. The percentage of TLESRs associated with reflux also decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Basal LES pressure increased from 14.7+/-2.1 mmHg to 17.9+/-2.6 mmHg (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Partial fundoplication controls GER through a reduction in the number of TLESRs and by decreasing the number of relaxations associated with reflux.     

Physiology and biophysics in electrocardiography

Simultaneous esophageal and gastric manometry and intraesophageal pH monitoring were performed in 12 patients with gastroesophageal reflux diseases in order to compare the frequency and mechanism of reflux in upright and supine postures. It was found that there was no differences in the number of reflux episodes, acid clearance time and percentage time of pH below 4 (P > 0.05). Frequency of reflux associated with lower esophageal sphinter relaxation (LESR) and gastric press increase was similar in two postures (P > 0.05). The results suggest that upright reflux may be as important as supine reflux in the development of reflux esophagitis. The main machanism of reflux in the two postures is LESR. Increase of gastric press may be a factor leading to gastroesophageal reflux.     

Lower esophageal sphincter function in children with and without gastroesophageal reflux

Resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was assessed in infants and children 2 weeks to 12 years of age. There were 62 control subjects and 35 patients with reproducible gastroesophageal reflux (GER) determined radiologically. In control subjects without GER: (1) LES pressure was well developed by 2 weeks of age; (2) in children less than 1 year of age, mean LES pressure (43.3 +/- 2.4 mm Hg) was significantly greater than mean LES pressure (30.6 +/- 2.3 mm Hg) children older than 1 year of age; (3) LES sphincter length increased with age; and (4) bethanechol 0.1 mg per kg subcutaneously caused a rise in LES pressure that increased in magnitude as LES resting pressures increased. In patients with GER: (1) only 16 or 35 children had LES pressures below the normal range for their appropriate age group; (2) LES length was shorter than control values in children beyond 6 months of age; (3) GER usually occurred in the absence of hiatus hernia; (4) clinical improvement was common and in patients with low LES pressure was associated with a rise in LES pressures to normal, even in the presenece of hiatus hernia; and (5) bethanechol caused a change and an absolute rise in LES pressure that were not significantly different from those observed in controls. These results indicate that in infants and children low LES pressure is not the sole determinant of GER, and that pharmacological stimulation of the Les could prove to be a useful adjunct to the medical management of GER.     

The molecular pathology of urological malignancies

BACKGROUND: Effective esophageal peristalsis is a major determinant of esophageal clearance function. The relation of esophageal body function with a mechanically defective lower esophageal sphincter and the development of esophageal mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease is unclear. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed the relations among the manometrically determined esophageal clearance function, lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction, esophageal acid exposure, and the presence and severity of esophageal mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Normal values for the manometric assessment of esophageal clearance function were established in 50 normal volunteers and subsequently applied to 160 symptomatic patients with increased esophageal exposure to gastric juice and various grades of esophageal mucosal injury (no minimal surgery, esophagitis, stricture, and Barrett's esophagus). RESULTS: Defective clearance function was present in 47.5% of the patients; a defective lower esophageal sphincter was documented in 63.1%. Compromised esophageal clearance function was significantly more common in patients with a defective lower esophageal sphincter than in those with normal sphincter function (55% versus 33.8%). Esophageal acid exposure time and the prevalence and severity of esophageal mucosal injury were highest in patients with a defective sphincter and compromised clearance function. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that esophageal motor function deteriorates with increasing severity of mucosal injury. This appears to be due to persistent reflux of gastric juice across a mechanically defective lower esophageal sphincter. This may influence the choice and outcome of antireflux surgery. Surgical correction of a mechanically defective sphincter before the loss of esophageal body function is advocated.     

Manometric study of the effects of experimental fundoplication in rats

BACKGROUND: The manometric effects of surgical repair of gastroesophageal reflux remain largely unknown, making the interpretation of the changes in the esophagogastric high pressure zone after fundoplication difficult. AIM: To measure in a murine model the transdiaphragmatic pressure gradients, intraabdominal esophageal length, and lower esophageal sphincter pressure and length after Nissen fundoplication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult Wistar rats were divided into two groups Control group (n = 10): in which measurements were made after laparotomy and intraabdominal esophageal dissection. Nissen Group (n = 15): in which measurements were made at baseline, after fundoplication and 1 week after surgery. We considered the following variables: end-inspiratory and end-expiratory transdiaphragmatic gradient (TDIG and TDEG respectively), lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) length (LESL), and length of the intraabdominal segment of the esophagus (LIAS). RESULTS: The LIAS increased significantly after esophagogastric dissection in the control group (11.38 +/- 3.22 mm vs 16.02 +/- mm, p < 0.05). No differences between pre- and postoperative status were found in TDIG, TDEG, LESP and LESL in the control group. However, LESP increased significantly after fundoplication (14.22 +/- 13.3 vs 32.96 +/- 7.8 mmHg, p < 0.05) and these differences were still present one week later (30.72 +/- 6.73 mmHg, p < 0.05). LESL was also increased (1.91 +/- 1.76 mm vs 7.68 +/- 1.83 mm) after fundoplication (p < 0.05), and reached 7.02 +/- 2.18 mm (p < 0.05) 1 week later. No differences were found in pre- and postoperative TDIG, TDEG and LIAS in the Nissen Group. CONCLUSION: In this murine experimental model, intraabdominal esophageal dissection increased the length of the intraabdominal esophagus without modifying the esophagogastric high pressure zone, while Nissen fundoplication increased lower esophageal sphincter pressure and length, without modifying the length of the intraabdominal esophagus or the transdiaphragmatic pressure gradients.     

Re: Second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and unconjugated oestriol after early transvaginal multifetal pregnancy reduction

BACKGROUND: There is a certain amount of controversy regarding the need to divide the short gastric vessels (SGV) in laparoscopic fundoplication for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In addition, there is often difficulty in identifying the crural fibers when encircling the lower esophagus. METHODS: We determine whether it is necessary to divide the SGV by trying to appose the gastric fundus to the anterior abdominal wall intraoperatively. If this could be done easily, the SGV are preserved. When their division is required, a posterior gastric approach is employed. We have also found that the injection of methylene blue into the left crural fibers anterior to the esophagus is helpful in identifying the left side when dissection posterior to the gastroesophageal junction is difficult. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 1995 we performed 20 laparoscopic fundoplications for GERD. All patients had at least grade 3 esophagitis (Savary-Miller scale), increased esophageal exposure to acid (median DeMeester score of 195), and decreased lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. The median operative time was 175 min. There were no conversions to open surgery, and there was no mortality. Three patients developed transient postoperative dysphagia and one patient had pneumonia. The median hospital stay was 3 days; all patients were free of reflux symptoms at follow-up ranging from 7 to 42 months. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the techniques described by us aid in intraoperative decision making and allow laparoscopic fundoplication to be both simple and effective.     

Effect of pneumatic dilation on gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia

The aims of this study were to assess the effect of pneumatic dilation on gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia, differentiate esophageal acid due to lactate from acid due to gastroesophageal reflux, and determine if chest pain and heartburn are reliable indicators of gastroesophageal reflux. Eight untreated achalasia patients underwent pre- and postdilation esophageal fluid/food residue lactate and pH analysis, esophageal manometry, 24-hr pH monitoring, and symptom assessment. All patients had a successful clinical outcome and a decrease in lower esophageal sphincter pressure from 29.1 +/- 12.7 to 14.7 +/- 3.8 mm Hg (mean +/- SD; P = 0.04). Abnormal acid exposure was present in two patients before and two patients after dilation. Postdilation acid exposure was mild. Lactate was detected before dilation in all patients. A lactate concentration >2 mmol/liter was associated with acidic residue and one abnormal 24-hr pH profile. There was no correlation between an abnormal 24-hr pH test and age, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, or duration of symptoms prior to treatment. Chest pain and heartburn were unrelated to drops in pH. Gastroesophageal reflux is rare in untreated achalasia and esophageal acidity may result from ingestion of acidic foods or production of lactate. Mild gastroesophageal reflux occurs after dilation but is of no clinical significance. Chest pain and heartburn are not indicators of acid reflux in achalasia.     

Incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after hyperbaric subarachnoid anesthesia with 5% lidocaine and 5% prilocaine

Laparoscopy causes an increase in intraabdominal pressure and may lead to an increase in gastroesophageal reflux (GER). We designed this study to assess and compare the frequency of GER and tracheal contamination in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and gynecological laparoscopy (LG). We studied 20 LC and 17 LG patients. The pH was measured using monocrystalline antimony pH electrodes positioned in the middle to upper esophagus and on the posterior wall of the trachea distal to the tip of the endotracheal tube. Acid reflux was defined as a decrease in esophageal pH to 4.0 or less. Alkaline reflux was defined as an abrupt increase in esophageal pH of more than 1.0, not associated with previous acid reflux. More than 80% of all patients at baseline had a gastric pH < or = 2. Overall, acid GER alone occurred in 47% patients in the LG group and in 15% patients in the LC group. During recovery, a larger proportion of patients had acid reflux in the LG group (47%) than in the LC group (10%). In contrast, alkaline reflux occurred in 75% of LC patients and 11.7% of LG patients. After cholecystectomy, there is an acute increase in the incidence of alkaline reflux. This alkaline reflux may be due to duodenogastric reflux resulting in an alkaline gastric shift. IMPLICATIONS: We studied the incidence of reflux of stomach contents in patients undergoing laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery for cholecystectomy or gynecology, using pH probes in the esophagus (gullet) and the trachea (windpipe). Acid reflux was very common but did not pass into the trachea. After gallbladder removal, the refluxed material became alkaline.     

Effect of gastrin-17 on lower esophageal sphincter characteristics in man

We studied the effect of gastrin-17 on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics in man. Nine healthy volunteers participated in two experiments performed in random order during continuous infusion of saline (control) or gastrin-17 (15 pmol/kg/hr). LES pressure (LESP) and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESR), as most the important reflux mechanism, were measured with intraesophageal sleeve manometry combined with pH metry. Infusion of gastrin-17 resulted in plasma gastrin levels comparable to those reached after a mixed meal. During continuous gastrin infusion, LESP decreased significantly (P < 0.05) compared to control. The rate and duration of TLESR was not influenced by gastrin-17. Gastroesophageal reflux and the number of TLESR associated with reflux were significantly (P < 0.05) increased during gastrin infusion. These results suggest that in humans gastrin at physiological postprandial plasma concentrations decreases LESP, does not influence TLESR, but increases the percentage of TLESR associated with reflux.     

Reflux esophagitis: manometry and Ph measurement

Manometry and pH-metry are essential in the examination of functional disturbances of the esophagus. Proven indications for manometry are dysphagia of unknown origin and noncardiac chest pain; in reflux esophagitis manometry is used for measuring pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter and detecting motility disorders of the esophageal body, pH-metry is used as long-term pH-metry to quantify gastroesophageal reflux during day and night; furthermore long-term pH-metry is important in the classification of atypical esophagitis. Recording gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility may influence planning of therapy and predict prognosis. Before antireflux surgery manometry and pH-metry are useful in judging the clearance mechanisms of the esophagus. Used critically, manometry and pH-metry can be very helpful as cost-effective diagnostic tools in the long-term therapy of reflux esophagitis.     

Mechanisms underlying the antireflux effect of Nissen fundoplication in children

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: It is reported that the main mechanism responsible for gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation in children. However, the effect of Nissen fundoplication on transient LES relaxation has not been investigated in children. This study examined the effect of Nissen fundoplication on motor patterns of the LES in children with pathological GER. METHODS: Esophageal manometry and pH were recorded concurrently for 2 hours after administration of apple juice (10 mL/kg). In seven children documented to have pathological GER by prolonged esophageal pH monitoring (%time pH less than 4.0>5.0), studies were performed preoperatively and 1 to 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Nissen fundoplication virtually eliminated reflux in all patients. Percentage of time pH was less than 4.0 reduced from 15+/-9 to 0+/-0. Basal LES pressure did not change significantly (pre, 21+/-10 mm Hg v post, 27+/-9 mm Hg). The number of transient LES relaxation reduced significantly from 13+/-4 to 7+/-7, and the mean nadir LES pressures during swallow-induced LES relaxation and transient LES relaxation increased significantly from 1+/-1 mm Hg to 13+/-5 mm Hg and from 0+/-0 mm Hg to 11+/-7 mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the antireflux effects of Nissen fundoplication may be based on changes of LES motor patterns that result in incomplete LES relaxation and reduction of the number of transient LES relaxation.     

Esophagitis in Sprague-Dawley rats is mediated by free radicals

Free radical-mediated esophagitis was studied during duodenogastroesophageal reflux (mixed reflux) or acid reflux in rats. The influence of reflux on esophageal glutathione levels was also examined. Mixed reflux caused more gross mucosal injury than acid reflux. Gross mucosal injury occurred in the mid-esophagus. Total glutathione (GSH) in the esophageal mucosa of control rats was highest in the distal esophagus. The time course of esophageal GSH in rats treated by mixed reflux showed a significant decrease 4 hr after initiation of reflux, followed by a significant increase from the 12th hour on. Mucosal GSH was increased in both reflux groups after 24 hr but significantly more so in the mixed than in the acid reflux group. The free radical scavenger superoxide dismutase (SOD) prevented esophagitis and was associated with decreased GSH levels. GSH depletion by buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) prevented esophagitis and stimulated SOD production in the esophageal mucosa. It is concluded that gastroesophageal reflux is associated with oxidative stress in the esophageal mucosa. The lower GSH levels in the mid-esophagus may predispose to damage in this area. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux causes more damage than pure acid reflux. Oxidative stress leads to GSH depletion of the esophageal mucosa in the first few hours following damage but then stimulates GSH production. GSH depletion by BSO does not worsen esophagitis since it increases the esophageal SOD concentration.     

Esophageal function in systemic sclerosis: a prospective evaluation of motility and acid reflux in 36 patients

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a connective tissue disorder which frequently involves the esophagus, with severe gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and dysphagia as clinical consequences of esophageal dysmotility. The relationship between the severity and extent of esophageal acid exposure and the specific manometric disturbances has received little attention. Similarly, a paucity of manometric data exists regarding pharyngeal/upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function in SSc patients. We prospectively studied 36 SSc patients using computerized solid-state manometric and ambulatory dual-pH (upper and lower esophageal) monitoring, to define further the relationship between esophageal dysmotility and severity of GER in these patients. Patients were separated for analysis into two subgroups based on the absence (group 1, N = 25) or presence (group 2, N = 11) of distal esophageal peristalsis. SSc disease variant (diffuse vs. limited) and duration of illness were inaccurate predictors of the presence and severity of esophageal involvement. The mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure for the SSc patients (15.8 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, mean +/- SE) was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than that for a control group (26.0 +/- 2.1 mm Hg). There was no significant difference between the mean LES pressure for group 1 (15.0 +/- 1.6 mm Hg) and group 2 (17.5 +/- 1.6 mm Hg) patients. Although distal esophageal aperistalsis was noted in 70% of patients, normal proximal esophageal contraction pressures were documented in all cases. Mean UES pressure was significantly (p < 0.01) lower in group 1 (52.5 +/- 4.6 mm Hg) than in group 2 (80.5 +/- 10.6 mm Hg). The mean duration of UES relaxation and the mean time interval between the onset of UES relaxation and onset of pharyngeal contraction were significantly (p < 0.05) shorter for group 1 than group 2 patients. Pharyngeal pressures, peristalsis, and other aspects of pharyngeal/UES coordination were normal. Excessive distal esophageal acid exposure was often seen in patients in both subgroups, but it was significantly (p < 0.01) greater in group 1. Excessive proximal esophageal acid exposure was documented only in patients with absent distal peristalsis. Linear regression analysis revealed a poor correlation between the severity of esophageal acid exposure and the LES pressure. Thus, the severity and extent of GER in SSc is most closely related to the integrity of distal esophageal peristalsis.     

Relationship of cervical and abdominal vagal activity to lower esophageal sphincter function

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of electrical stimulation of the abdominal and cervical portions of the vagus on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure in the anesthetized opossum. Unilateral or bilateral abdominal vagotomy gave no significant change in basal LES pressure or in the sphincteric response to swallowing. Electrical stimulation of the peripheral end of the sectioned cervical vagus gave a frequency-related decrease in LES pressure with a maximum reduction of 93.5 +/- 2.5% at 10 HZ, 10 V. Stimulation of the central end of the cervical vagus increased LES pressure, with a maximum response of 34.0 +/- 1.9 mm Hg. Neither peripheral nor central stimulation of the sectioned abdominal vagus had significant effect on LES pressure (P greater than 0.05). Additionally, LES relaxation in response to swallowing or cervical vagal stimulation was intact after bilateral abdominal vagotomy. These studies suggest that whereas the cervical portion of the vagus mediates inhibitory and excitatory changes in LES pressure, the abdominal vagus has no demonstrable role in the control of LES function.     

Effects of barium on stimulus-induced changes in [K+]o and field potentials in dentate gyrus and area CA1 of human epileptic hippocampus

Congenital para-oesophageal hiatal hernia (PEHH) is a rare problem in infancy, however, it constitutes a clinical entity that mandates surgical repair once the diagnosis is made. In the paediatric age group, acquired PEHH has been described as a major complication in a number of patients who were treated surgically for gastro-oesophageal reflux (GER) by Nissen fundoplication. PEHH is a frequently encountered condition in elderly patients; it accounts for 5% of diaphragmatic hiatal hernias. In both paediatric and adult patients PEHH, whether congenital or acquired in origin, is usually associated with potentially lethal complications such as gastric volvulus, incarceration, and perforation. In clinical practice true PEHH is extremely rare. The term has been expanded to include large gastric hiatal hernias where most of the stomach and the gastro-oesophageal junction are in the chest. Six infants with congenital PEHH are presented, together with an attempt to understand its possible aetiology and a review of its current surgical management.     

Should adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment be administered in esophageal cancer?

The Nissen fundoplication is not the proper antireflux procedure for patients with poor esophageal peristalsis as it does not strengthen impaired esophageal peristalsis. The aim of this study was to investigate if tailoring of antireflux surgery according to esophageal contractility is an effective treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with a low incidence of postoperative dysphagia. The Toupet fundoplication was laparoscopically performed on 32 patients with poor esophageal peristalsis and the Nissen fundoplication on 17 patients with normal peristalsis. After a median follow-up of 15 months, only 1 of the 49 patients (2.04%) complained of heartburn. Acute esophagitis was found in none of them on endoscopy. Of 40 patients tested postoperatively, 2 (5%) underwent pathologic esophageal pH monitoring. Postoperative dysphagia was found in two patients (4.1%) compared with 25 (51%) preoperatively (p < 0.05). There was a significant reduction of dysphagia following the Toupet fundoplication. Both procedures increased the resting pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) significantly, which was more pronounced following the Nissen fundoplication. Relaxation of the LES was significantly better following the Toupet than after the Nissen fundoplication. There was significant improvement of esophageal peristalsis following the Toupet fundoplication. Tailored antireflux surgery is an effective strategy for treatment of GERD. The incidence of postoperative dysphagia is low owing to improvement of impaired esophageal peristalsis following the Toupet fundoplication. It may be due to the fact that the Toupet fundoplication causes less esophageal outflow resistance than the Nissen fundoplication.     

Continuous positive airway pressure and gastroesophageal reflux: an experimental study

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) often occurs in babies receiving respiratory assistance for neonatal distress. The authors examined the lower esophageal sphincter and the thoracic and abdominal pressure conditions in rats under progressively higher continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to test the efficacy of the antireflux barrier under such conditions. Intrathoracic and intraabdominal pressures were recorded within the esophagus and within the inferior vena cava in 10 anaesthesized 250-g male rats. Pull-through techniques were used for lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and length (LESL) studies, and the length of the intraabdominal segment of the esophagus (LIASE) was also determined. Measurements were performed in baseline conditions and at CPAP levels of 0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 cm H2O. The respiratory effort progressively increased with prolonged expiration and decreased frequency. LESP and LESL did not change significantly, but the antireflux barrier was weakened by a progressive shortening of LIASE. Successive CPAP increases led to increasingly negative thoracic pressures during inspiration, and increasingly positive abdominal pressures during expiration yielded progressively greater transdiaphragmatic pressure gradients. The authors suggest that CPAP weakens the antireflux barrier and, at the same time, increases the gastroesophageal pressure gradient, thus increasing the risk of GER. Although transpolation of experimental data to the clinical setting is always hazardous, the authors believe this issue should be investigated in infants.     

Clinical and manometric results of laparoscopic partial (Toupet) and complete (Rosetti-Nissen) fundoplication

It is unclear whether a partial or complete gastric fundoplication done laparoscopically will offer the best control of reflux with the fewest side effects. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic Rosetti-Nissen (360) and Toupet (180) fundoplication was performed with assessment of clinical and manometric data. METHODS: Patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux referred for surgical correction underwent preoperative motility and upper endoscopy. A Rosetti-Nissen or Toupet fundoplication was then performed laparoscopically. Short gastrics were not divided. No bougie was used in the Toupet, which was sutured intracorporeally. A 2-cm, loose, floppy wrap about a 50-Fr bougie was performed in the Nissen. Eleven patients underwent Rosetti-Nissen and 11 Toupet fundoplication. Mean ages, duration symptoms, weight, and baseline LES, were not different. Preop esophagitis grades were similar, as were Visick Scores and presence of dysphagia. RESULTS: Visick scores at 6 months were better in the Toupet group than the Rosetti-Nissen (P = 0.07). Persistent Dysphagia in four, Gas-Bloat in two, and Odynophagia in one within the Rosetti-Nissen group accounted for the difference, and were not seen in Toupets. LES pressures differed significantly pre and postop (P < 0.001). The change in LES pressure was significantly different between Toupet and Rosetti-Nissen (chart). Seven patients had postop 24-h pH tests; all had no reflux. Three Rosettis have required revision to Toupet, with resolution of their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe GERD, laparoscopic Toupet and Rosetti-Nissen control symptoms and esophageal pH similarly. LES pressures are higher postop in the Rosetti-Nissen. Dysphagia and gas-bloat are more prevalent in the Nissen group. Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication may be superior to Rosetti-Nissen in reducing the frequency of side effects frequently associated with antireflux surgery, yet with equal control of reflux.     

Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease with poor esophageal body motility

Impaired esophageal body motility is a complication of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In patients with this disease, a 360-degree fundoplication may result in severe postoperative dysphagia. Forty-six patients with GERD who had a weak lower esophageal sphincter pressure and a positive acid reflux score associated with impaired esophageal body peristalsis in the distal esophagus (amplitude <30 mm Hg and >10% simultaneous or interrupted waves) were selected to undergo laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication. They were compared with 16 similar patients with poor esophageal body function who underwent Nissen fundoplication. The patients who underwent Toupet fundoplication had less dysphagia than those who had the Nissen procedure (9% vs.44%; P=0.0041). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory pH monitoring and esophageal manometry were repeated in 31 Toupet patients 6 months after surgery. Percentage of time of esophageal exposure to pH <4.0, DeMeester reflux score, lower esophageal pressure, intra-abdominal length, vector volume, and distal esophageal amplitude all improved significantly after surgery. Ninety-one percent of patients were free of reflux symptoms. The laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication provides an effective antireflux barrier according to manometric, pH, and symptom criteria. It avoids potential postoperative dysphagia in patients with weak esophageal peristalsis and results in improved esophageal body function 6 months after surgery.