Case History of Geosynthetic Reinforced Segmental Retaining Wall Failure

A geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall was collapsed during a monsoon season in Korea, three months after the completion of wall construction. The circular type global slope failure was the dominant failure mode. The as-built design was examined for its appropriateness in meeting the current design requirements and the global slope stability. A comprehensive stress-pore pressure-coupled finite-element analysis was additionally conducted with due consideration of both positive and negative pore pressures in saturated and unsaturated zones. A number of relevant tests were also carried out on the backfill and the reinforcement collected from the site. The investigation revealed among other things that the inappropriate design and the low-quality backfill were mainly responsible for the wall failure, although the primary triggering factor was the rainfall infiltration. The results of the stress-pore pressure-coupled finite-element analysis provided sound evidences as to the wall performance over the rainfall period, supporting the field observation. Practical implications of the findings from this study are also discussed in view of reinforced wall design.     

Geosynthetic Reinforced Multitiered Walls

Current design of mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls shows that the tensile stress in the reinforcement increases rapidly with height. To take advantage of both the aesthetics and the economics of MSE walls while considering high heights, multitiered walls are often used. In such walls, an offset between adjacent tiers is used. If the offset is large enough, the tensile stress in the reinforcement in lower tiers is reduced. However, a rational design methodology for multitiered MSE walls that accurately predicts wall performance is lacking. AASHTO 98 design guidelines are limited to two-tiered walls with zero batter. In fact, this design is purely empirical using “calibrated” lateral earth pressures adopted from limited guidelines developed for metallic strip walls. Empirical data available for multitiered walls is limited and it seems to be nonexistent for geosynthetic walls. In fact, generation of an extensive database for tiered walls is a major challenge since there are practically limitless configurations for such systems. As an alternative, this study presents the results of parametric studies conducted in parallel using two independent types of analyses: One is based on limiting equilibrium (LE) and one on continuum mechanics. The premise of this work is that if the two uncoupled analyses produce similar results, an acceptable level of confidence in the results can be afforded. This confidence stems from the fact that LE is currently being used for design of reinforced and unreinforced slopes (i.e., having a slope angle less than 70°); the agreement with continuum mechanics facilitates its extrapolation to use in MSE walls. Parametric studies were carried out to assess the required tensile strength as a function of reinforcement length and stiffness, offset distance, the fill and foundation strength, water, surcharge, and number of tiers. It is concluded that LE analyses may be extended to the analysis of multitiered walls.     

On Global Equilibrium in Design of Geosynthetic Reinforced Walls

Common design of MSE walls is based on a lateral earth pressure approach. A key aspect in design is the determination of the reactive force in each reinforcement layer so as to maintain the system in equilibrium. This force leads to the selection of reinforcement with adequate long term strength. It is also used to calculate the pullout resistive length needed to ensure the capacity of each layer to develop strength. Lateral earth pressures used in design may or may not satisfy basic global equilibrium of the reinforced soil mass. Hence, the present work establishes a benchmark test using a simple statically determinate approach, in order to check if different design procedures satisfy equilibrium. Basic statics indicate that such a test is necessary, but not sufficient, to ascertain the validity of the calculated reactive force. Three existing design methods are examined: AASHTO, National Concrete Masonry Association, and Ko-stiffness. AASHTO, which is the simplest to apply and generally considered conservative, satisfies the benchmark test. However, it may yield very conservative results if one considers the facing to play a major role. NCMA is likely satisfactory if one explicitly accounts for the facing shear resistance in assessing the reaction in the reinforcement. The emerging Ko-stiffness approach, which is empirical, may violate statics potentially leading to underestimation of the reinforcement force.     

Required Unfactored Strength of Geosynthetic in Reinforced Earth Structures

Current reinforced earth structure designs arbitrarily distinguish between reinforced walls and slopes, that is, the batter of walls is 20° or less while in slopes it is larger than 20°. This has led to disjointed design methodologies where walls employ a lateral earth pressure approach and slopes utilize limit equilibrium analyses. The earth pressure approach used is either simplified (e.g., ignoring facing effects), approximated (e.g., considering facing effects only partially), or purely empirical. It results in selection of a geosynthetic with a long-term strength that is potentially overly conservative or, by virtue of ignoring statics, potentially unconservative. The limit equilibrium approach used in slopes deals explicitly with global equilibrium only; it is ambiguous about the load in individual layers. Presented is a simple limit equilibrium methodology to determine the unfactored global geosynthetic strength required to ensure sufficient internal stability in reinforced earth structures. This approach allows for seamless integration of the design methodologies for reinforced earth walls and slopes. The methodology that is developed accounts for the sliding resistance of the facing. The results are displayed in the form of dimensionless stability charts. Given the slope angle, the design frictional strength of the soil, and the toe resistance, the required global unfactored strength of the reinforcement can be determined using these charts. The global strength is then distributed among individual layers using three different assumed distribution functions. It is observed that, generally, the assumed distribution functions have secondary effects on the trace of the critical slip surface. The impact of the distribution function on the required global strength of reinforcement is minor and exists only when there is no toe resistance, when the slope tends to be vertical, or when the soil has low strength. Conversely, the impact of the distribution function on the maximum unfactored load in individual layers, a value which is typically used to select the geosynthetics, can result in doubling its required long-term strength.     

Deformation Patterns of Reinforced Foundation Sand at Failure

While the stability of foundation soils has been written about extensively, the ultimate loads on reinforced soils is a subject studied to a much lesser degree. There is convincing experimental evidence in the literature that metal strips or layers of geosynthetic reinforcement can significantly increase the failure loads on foundation soils. Laboratory tests were performed to investigate the kinematics of the collapse of sand reinforced with a layer of flexible reinforcement. Sequential images of the deformation field under a model footing were digitally recorded. A correlation-based motion detection technique was used to arrive at an incremental displacement field under a strip footing model. Color-coded displacements are presented graphically. The mechanism retains some of the characteristic features of a classical bearing capacity pattern of failure, but the reinforcement modifies that mechanism to some extent. The strips of geotextile used as model reinforcement give rise to the formation of shear bands in a narrow layer adjacent to the geosynthetic. Reinforcement restrains the horizontal displacement of the soil and alters the collapse pattern. The mechanism of deformation identified in the tests will constitute a basis for limit analysis of reinforced foundation soils.     

Seismic Displacement of Slopes Reinforced with Piles

The seismic stability of slopes reinforced with a row of piles is analyzed using the kinematic theorem of limit analysis within the framework of the pseudostatic approach. An existing method which is based on the theory of plasticity is used to determine the lateral forces provided by the piles. Expressions for calculating the yield acceleration coefficient are derived. Then, based on Newmark’s sliding block concept, the permanent displacement induced by an earthquake shocking can be calculated by the integrals of seismic records. An example is investigated to illustrate the validity of this method and the effects of piles on a restraining slope’s dynamic deformation.     

Lateral Resistance of Single Pile Located Near Geosynthetic Reinforced Slope

An extensive program of laboratory tests was carried out to study the effect of reinforcing an earth slope on the lateral behavior of a single vertical pile located near the slope. Layers of geogrid were used to reinforce a sandy slope of 1 (V):1.5 (H) made with sands of three different unit weights representing dense, medium dense, and loose relative densities. Several configurations of geogrid reinforcement with different numbers of layers, vertical spacing, and length were investigated. The experimental program also included studies of the location of pile relative to the slope crest, relative density of sand, and embedment length of pile. The results indicate that stabilizing a soil slope has a significant benefit of improving the lateral load resistance of a vertical pile. The improvement in pile lateral load was found to be strongly dependent on the number of geogrid layers, layer size, and relative density of the sand. It was also found that soil reinforcement is more effective for piles located closer to the slope crest. Based on test results, critical values are discussed and recommended.     

Displacements of Reinforced Slopes Subjected to Seismic Loads

Traditional analyses of stability of slopes subjected to seismic loads entail global equilibrium considerations with seismic influence included as a quasi-static force. Such an analysis does not reflect the earthquake shaking process, and it does not provide any information about permanent displacements that may have occurred as a result of that process. Earthquake events in recent years have brought about renewed interest in analyses of slopes subjected to seismic loads. This paper focuses on displacement calculations of reinforced slopes. Design of reinforced slopes using the quasi-static approach may lead to an unrealistically long reinforcement for large ground accelerations. If slopes are allowed to move by even a small displacement, then the reinforcement length can be reduced significantly. Two mechanisms of failure of reinforced slopes subjected to seismic conditions are considered: (1) Rotational collapse; and (2) sliding directly over the bottom layer of reinforcement. Yield accelerations and integrals of seismic records are presented in charts for easy use in practical applications. An example is shown to illustrate the method.     

Strains Preceding Failure in Infinite Slopes

An analysis is presented of the strains and displacements that take place in an infinite slope, consisting of an elastic‐plastic Mohr‐Coulomb material, due to the increase of the water table level. In particular, an attempt is made to establish a relationship between the displacements before failure and the slope safety factor. It is also shown that, for a slope of given geometry and mechanical properties, the strains and displacements before failure are significantly influenced by the ratio between the stress components parallel and normal to the slope. The initial state of stress plays a major role in defining the thickness of the shear zone within which the shear and volumetric plastic strains concentrate before failure.     

Quasi-Monte Carlo Simulation with Low-Discrepancy Sequence for Reinforced Soil Slopes

This paper describes a precise numerical technique to compute the limit state exceedance probability of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) slopes with normally distributed backfill and foundation soils by using the low-discrepancy sequence Monte Carlo (LDSMC) and importance sampling with LDSMC (ISLDSMC) methods. The LDSMC and ISLDSMC methods can effectively compute an accurate limit state exceedance probability of GRS slopes with a limited number of simulations. By using importance sampling, random variables can be generated in an expected failure region, thereby enabling enumeration by the Monte Carlo simulation. The failure region can be searched by the conventional first-order reliability method. To increase the computational efficiency, a low-discrepancy sequence, which is a sequence of quasi-random numbers with uniform distribution, is adopted in this study. The numerical simulation in this study revealed that the LDSMC and ISLDSMC methods can effectively compute an accurate limit state exceedance probability of GRS slopes by performing comparatively fewer simulations than the conventional crude Monte Carlo simulation.     

Centrifuge Model Studies of the Seismic Response of Reinforced Soil Slopes

Centrifuge tests were used to study the dynamic behavior of soil slopes reinforced with geosynthetics and metal grids. The main objectives were to determine the failure mechanism and amount of deformations under seismic loading and to identify the main parameters controlling seismically induced deformations. Geosynthetically reinforced soil slopes (2V:1H) and vertical walls reinforced with metallic mesh strips were subjected to earthquake motions with maximum foundation accelerations of up to 1.08g. The experimental results show that slope movement can occur under relatively small base accelerations, and significant lateral and vertical deformations can occur within the reinforced soil mass under strong shaking. However, no distinct failure surfaces were observed, and the magnitude of deformations is related to the backfill density, reinforcement stiffness and spacing, and slope inclination.     

Evaluating the Long-Term Performance of Geosynthetic Clay Liners Exposed to Freeze-Thaw

An important consideration for landfill liners and covers constructed in the frost zone of cold climates is the possible deterioration in performance due to freeze-thaw cycling over the design life of the liner or cover system. Several examples in the literature show that geosynthetic clay liners can withstand a limited number of freeze-thaw events, but data on long-term freeze-thaw performance are lacking. The objective of this study was to examine the long-term performance of geosynthetic clay liners exposed to repeated freeze-thaw cycles, encompassing their application as a final cover as well as a bottom liner. Measurements of hydraulic conductivity were performed after as many as 150 freeze-thaw cycles, with no appreciable increases observed.     

矿山边坡破环模式分析

地质不连续面及开挖面对岩体的切割方式确定了开挖边坡的破坏模式,本文按此思路讨论了识别破坏模式的简化判据和方法问题。重点地举出了四个不同的滑坡实例,分析了它们的破坏模式,并初步探讨了它们的破坏机制问题。     

Thickness and Hydraulic Performance of Geosynthetic Clay Liners Overlying a Geonet

Experimental results from physical testing are reported to examine the thickness and hydraulic performance of three geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) overlying a geonet when subjected to vertical stresses (e.g., as may be found in a secondary leachate collection layer or hydraulic control layer in solid waste landfills). The GCL was found to intrude into the underlying geonet and the effects of GCL type and water content, temperature, applied pressure, and test duration on the final GCL thickness are examined. The results are consistent with GCL deformation from the beneficial consolidation of bentonite as opposed to lateral extrusion of bentonite. Results from fixed ring flow tests suggest that the indentations in the GCL caused by intrusion into the underlying geonet do not appear to negatively impact the hydraulic performance (permittivity or resistance to internal erosion) of the particular GCLs tested for the conditions examined. The flow capacity of the geonet in these tests was found to depend not only on the amount of GCL intrusion but also on the orientation of the geonet relative to the flow direction.     

Implementation of a Critical State Two-Surface Model to Evaluate the Response of Geosynthetic Reinforced Pavements

A finite-element model was developed using ABAQUS software package to investigate the effect of placing geosynthetic reinforcement within the base course layer on the response of a flexible pavement structure. A critical state two-surface constitutive model was first modified to represent the behavior of base course materials under the unsaturated field conditions. The modified model was then implemented into ABAQUS through a user defined subroutine, UMAT. The implemented model was validated using the results of laboratory triaxial tests. Finite-element analyses were then conducted on different unreinforced and geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavement sections. The results of this study demonstrated the ability of the modified critical state two-surface constitutive model to predict, with good accuracy, the response of the considered base course material at its optimum field conditions when subjected to cyclic as well as static loads. The results of the finite-element analyses showed that the geosynthetic reinforcement reduced the lateral strains within the base course and subgrade layers. Furthermore, the inclusion of the geosynthetic layer resulted in a significant reduction in the vertical and shear strains at the top of the subgrade layer. The improvement of the geosynthetic layer was found to be more pronounced in the development of the plastic strains rather than the resilient strains. The reinforcement benefits were enhanced as its elastic modulus increased.     

Hydraulic Performance of Geosynthetic Clay Liners in a Landfill Final Cover

Percolation from a landfill final cover containing a geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) as the hydraulic barrier is described. The GCL was covered with 760?mm of vegetated silty sand and underlain with two gravel-filled lysimeters to monitor percolation from the base of the cover. Higher than anticipated percolation rates were recorded in both lysimeters within 4–15?months after installation of the GCL. The GCL was subsequently replaced with a GCL laminated with a polyethylene geofilm on one surface (a “composite” GCL). The composite GCL was installed in two ways, with the geofilm oriented upwards or downwards. Low percolation rates (2.6–4.1?mm/year) have been transmitted from the composite GCL for more than 5?years regardless of the orientation of the geofilm. Samples of the conventional GCL that were exhumed from the cover ultimately had hydraulic conductivities on the order of 5×10?5?cm/s. These high hydraulic conductivities apparently were caused by exchange of Ca and Mg for Na on the bentonite combined with dehydration. The overlying and underlying soils likely were the source of the Ca and Mg involved in the exchange. Column experiments and numerical modeling indicated that plant roots and hydraulic anomalies caused by the lysimeters were not responsible for the high hydraulic conductivity of the GCL. Despite reports by others, the findings of this study indicate that a surface layer 760?mm thick is unlikely to protect conventional GCLs from damage caused by cation exchange and dehydration. Accordingly, GCLs should be used in final covers with caution unless if cation exchange and dehydration can be prevented or another barrier layer is present (geomembrane or geofilm).