Deltamethrin multifactorial activity toward carp larva mobility related to calcium, humic acids, and pH

BACKGROUND: Patient, physician, and consultation variables associated with overweight and smoking counseling in general practice consultations were examined. METHODS: A random sample of full-time general practitioners was used. The sample consisted of 7,160 patients from 230 GPs who attended for consultations on consecutive days, and self-reported information from the doctor and the patient was collected via questionnaire. The aim of this paper is to identify variables associated with the doctor's identification of overweight and smoking status and with the occurrence of counseling for these two behavioral risk factors. RESULTS: Forty percent of patients were overweight (BMI > 24) and 25% were self-reported smokers. Doctors identified 59% of overweight patients and 66% of smokers. Doctors only counseled patients identified as having the risk factor, counseling 36% of identified overweight patients and 49% of identified smokers. Identification of overweight was associated with being female, being heavier, having been previously counseled, being less well educated, presenting with an associated condition, and visiting a doctor who is younger and knows the patient's medical history well. Counseling for overweight was associated with being younger, being previously counseled, presenting with an associated condition, presenting for a routine checkup, visiting a GP who generally has longer consultations, having BP measured in the consultation, visiting an older doctor and visiting a doctor who considers identification of risk behaviors important. Identification of smokers was associated with being a heavier smoker, with those who had been previously counseled, with marital status other than single or married, with a BP measurement being taken in the consultation, and with a doctor who believed it possible to influence lifestyle change. Counseling for smoking was associated with younger patients, longer consultations, previous counseling, BP measurement, presenting with an associated condition, and not presenting frequently. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified factors associated with counseling about behavioral risk factors which provide a framework for planning education programs to increase the level of primary preventive activities within general practice.     

Blastocyst formation is a good indicator for attainment of assisted reproduction

The revised structure of hospital specialist training being introduced in the United Kingdom means that a doctor wanting a career in a hospital specialty will need to be confident that his or her early career choice, made within 3 years of qualification, is realistic. Using data from a longitudinal study of the 1983 cohort of UK medical graduates, the early career choices made by over 2000 doctors were compared with their employment 11 years after qualification. At year 11 65% of the doctors were working within the first choice they had expressed towards the end of their pre-registration year, and 79% were employed in their year 3 first choice. There was, however, important variation within this general picture: lower predictive value was associated with choices made by women; choices for hospital mainstreams rather than for general practice; and choices that were less than definite. The recent drop in popularity of general practice as a career choice of new graduates in the UK, and the steady increase in the proportion of women graduates, mean that the predictive value of the career choices of recent graduates may prove to be lower than that of the 1983 cohort.     

Information in the ICU: are we being honest with our patients? The results of a European questionnaire

BACKGROUND: We were interested in determining the current practices and views of European intensive care doctors regarding communication with patients and informed consent for interventions. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the 1272 western European doctor members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. All questionnaires were anonymous. Five hundred four completed questionnaires from 16 western European countries were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 25 % said they would always give complete information to a patient, although 35 % felt they should. Thirty-two percent would give complete details of an iatrogenic incident, but 70% felt they should. There were significant differences in these attitudes between doctors from different countries, with doctors from the Netherlands more likely to give complete information, and doctors from Greece, Spain and Italy less likely. Fifty percent of the respondents required written consent for surgery, but for insertion of an arterial catheter oral consent was more widely accepted. The Netherlands and Scandinavia generally accepted oral requests for procedures, while Germany and the United Kingdom preferred written requests. Doctors of all countries were generally happy with their current practice concerning informed consent. Seventy-five percent would accept the right of a patient to refuse treatment, but 19% would carry out the procedure against the patient's wishes. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors are often not completely honest with their patients regarding their diagnosis or prognosis, or in the event of an iatrogenic incident. However, most doctors will respect a patient's right to refuse treatment. Informed consent practices vary substantially and are largely determined by locally accepted policy and accepted by doctors working in those areas.     

When a physician makes a mistake

Inevitably, doctors make mistakes in the normal course of providing care. Making a mistake often causes distress for the doctor involved, but it can also be an important source of knowledge and self-reflection. This article discusses central aspects with respect to mistakes and medical malpractice. The doctor's relationship to ethics and legislation is discussed, and an overview of the administrative action taken by the Norwegian health authorities is presented. The organisations and offices a physician may come into contact with when involved in a patient's complaint are briefly presented. "Meldesentralen" was formed in 1993 by the Norwegian Directorate of Health for the purpose of collecting reports on accidents in medical practice. We argue that the accidents reported to "Meldesentralen" do not reflect the true situation on this issue. We introduce a model for a systematic approach towards a colleague who has made a mistake or who is suspected of having made one.     

The story of suffering. On the traces of narrative medicine

In recognising the importance of narratives of illness we conducted a study on the ability of a specific method to elicit the patient's story. A Five Minute Speech Sample (FMSS) interview was applied to 92 patients with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer. According to Mishler, a complete narrative has six elements: abstract, orientation, complicating action, evaluation, result and coda, with complicating action and evaluation as the essential parts. Of the 92 patients, 50 gave a narrative during the FMSS. One of the narratives is referred in detail. The article advocates giving renewed attention to patients' stories, because they bring the doctor closer to the patients' point of view. This is particularly important when dealing with chronic illness and crises.     

Cross sectional study of symptom attribution and recognition of depression and anxiety in primary care

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of patients' causal attributions of common somatic symptoms on recognition by general practitioners of cases of depression and anxiety and to test the hypothesis that normalising attributions make recognition less likely. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey. SETTING: One general practice of eight doctors in Bristol. SUBJECTS: 305 general practice attenders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The rate of detection by general practitioners of cases of depression and anxiety as defined by the general health questionnaire. RESULTS: Consecutive attenders completed the general health questionnaire and the symptom interpretation questionnaire, which scores style of symptom attribution along the dimensions of psychologising, somatising, and normalising. General practitioners detected depression or anxiety in 56 (36%; 95% confidence interval 28% to 44%) of the 157 patients who scored highly on the general health questionnaire. Subjects with a normalising attributional style were less likely to be detected as cases; doctors did not make any psychological diagnosis in 46 (85%; 73% to 93%) of 54 patients who had high questionnaire and high normalising scores. Those with a psychologising style were more likely to be detected; doctors did not detect 21 (38%; 25% to 52%) of 55 patients who had high questionnaire and high psychologising scores. The somatisation scale was not associated with low detection rates. This pattern of results persisted after adjustment for age, sex, general health questionnaire score, and general practitioner. CONCLUSIONS: Normalising attributions minimise symptoms and are non-pathological in character. The normalising attributional style is predominant in general practice attenders and is an important cause of low rates of detection of depression and anxiety.     

Psychotropic drugs in primary care

Nowadays psychiatrists and general practitioners are confronted with two realities which seem to be conflicting: psychotropic drugs are too largely prescribed while many depressed patients are not treated adequately. Any approach based upon clinical and/or pharmacological criteria is likely to oversimplify the medical practice in as much it generates too many clinical entities and shrinks drugs-induced effects to responses of isolated target. The specificity of any symptoms has to be evaluated within the limits of other associated symptoms and patient's personality. The treatment has to be carried out on a joined basis; the patient who has to be informed and the doctor who is also the patient's adviser. Patient's demand is changing, looking for permanent improvement of their well-being as well as improvement of their performances. The answer is clearly complicated and needs more knowledges and also deep concern on mankind.     

Does the general practitioner have a place in future medicine?

The structure and content of the health care services are changing rapidly. General practice will be justified just as long as patients, doctors and society at large consider it important, useful, safe and economically sound. In order to survive it is important for the general practitioner, as a "Jack of all trades", to set honest limits for his or her own competence, and learn to use the new information technology to retrieve relevant knowledge quickly. The "patient" patient will become less frequent and more demanding consumers are emerging. The generalist is getting additional, new roles as the patient's teacher and adviser. The government and other payers will expect more documentation of outcome, cost-effectiveness and quality assurance from general practice. For the generalist, one of the major challenges will be a necessary transition from being an individualist to becoming more of a team player.     

Satisfaction with medical care during pregnancy and delivery

Societal attitudes toward the medical profession are apparently undergoing a change from awe and total respect to a more critical assessing of accountability and credibility. Based on mass media reports and the increasing number of malpractice suits, it would appear that a rational, unbiased review of medical doctors, hospital personnel, and care received is in order. This review should be concerned with technical aspects of medicine as determined by highly competent professionals and the consumer's view of the medical care he receives. The latter review should logically be taken directly to the consumers of medical care to determine their satisfaction with the care they received. Because of the varied areas of specialty within the medical profession, there are different types of relationships between doctors and their patients. The obstetrician, for instance, is usually associated with pregnancy as a joyful event, in contrast to a surgeon whose diagnosis may seldom be accompanied by joy. Satisfaction with medical care could thus be expected to vary according to the area of specialty and may be related to factors over which doctors have no control, factors which initially bring the patient to the doctor for care. The degree of anxiety related to the patient's condition could also be expected to contribute to the degree of satisfaction expressed by the patient.     

Breast neoplasms: information in question(s). A survey of patients and physicians at a cancer treatment center

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to know the wishes of our patients for information and to compare them with the point of view of our colleagues in a cancer center. METHODS: We gave 100 consecutive new patients with breast cancer a questionnaire about their needs. The same questionnaire was given in duplicate to all our colleagues in the cancer center (n = 53) asking: 1) their own needs of information if they had breast cancer 2) how they thought the patients would answer. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of the patients and 81% of the doctors returned the questionnaire (28 were men and 15 women; 81% were involved in the management of breast cancer). On one hand, concerning information about the disease and about the treatment, there was no difference between the needs expressed by patients of doctors (as patients). As expected, the two groups wanted to be well informed. On the other hand, there was always a statistically significant difference between the needs expressed by patients and the opinion of doctors who systematically underestimated them. Concerning information to the family, 21% of doctors and only 4% of patients didn't want any information to be given to their family. Interestingly, 67% of the patients thought the decision had to be taken together with the doctor and 56% of the doctors (as patients) wished the decision to be taken by the doctor. CONCLUSION: Patients and physicians if they were patients, expressed the same high level need of information, but the patients needs seemed underestimated by the majority of doctors.     

Treatment of duck hepatitis B virus by antisense poly-2''-O-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-oligoribonucleotides

This study sought the opinions of a select group of professionals, trained in medicine and law concerning: professional privilege; management of patients who posed risks to society; and the legal charge to impose upon a patient with uncontrolled epilepsy who caused a fatality by driving contrary to medical advice. The second Academic Seminar of the Australian College of Legal Medicine was surveyed to define demographics and opinions. Of 23 respondents, 14 were trained in law and medicine, of whom eight had post graduate medical qualifications and seven had more than basic legal training; 20/23 supported professional privilege in medicine but 18/23 denied its absoluteness; 22/23 felt the doctor had a right to divulge information in the public interest. Only 14/23 (although still a majority opinion) felt this right was a duty and 6/23 refuted the same. When concerned regarding compliance not to drive, 7/23 would discuss it with family/friends in contravention of patient consent, 12/23 would report to the driving authorities where concern became fact, 13/23 would advise the patient that a report would be sent, 4/23 would report without the patient's knowledge and four would threaten but not send the report. In the case of a fatality consequent to non-compliance, 10/23 considered murder and 22/23 considered manslaughter charges to be appropriate. The majority supported professional privilege in the doctor/patient relationship but also supported the right or even a duty to report risks to society. Where a concern arose that a patient with epilepsy may drive contrary to advice, one-third of doctors would discuss with family/friends, without consent, one-half would report the patient to the driving authorities, while almost three-quarters would report the patient if concern was realised. Murder and manslaughter, serious charges, were deemed appropriate for patients who caused death by driving against medical advice.     

Telemedicine for diabetes care: the DIABTel approach towards diabetes telecare

Telemedicine is modifying classical health care by providing effective solutions to an increasing number of new situations. This article summarizes the potential benefits made available by this technology in diabetes care, and describes in detail how the new DIABTel Telemedicine Service complements the daily care of diabetic patients. The basic functions of the telemedicine system include telemonitoring of patient's blood glucose data and self-management actions, and remote care from doctors to diabetic patients. The system's architecture comprises two main components: the Medical Workstation, a PC-based system to be used by physicians and nurses in Diabetes Day Centre units in hospitals, and the Patient Unit, a palmtop-computer to be used by patients in their day to day activities. Both components, in an integrated approach, offer tools to doctors and patients for data collection and management, viewing and interpretation modules, data/message exchange services and an interactive glucose/insulin simulator for educational purposes. The DIABTel telemedicine diabetes care procedure aims: (1) to improve communication of the patient with the hospital-based diabetologist, in between the patient's visits to the clinic; (2) to allow doctors to assess the patient's condition on a frequent basis (every week); (3) to help patients with management in the daily care of diabetes, and (4) to provide patients with a service of 'supervised autonomy', to increase patient's independence without decreasing the necessary continual support and supervision from the doctor. Finally, we discuss the practical problems, limitations and vital issues regarding implementation of the telemedicine service.     

Measuring quality in general practice. Pilot study of a needs, process and outcome measure

1. As part of the Scottish Shadow Fundholding Evaluation (1990-92), quality of care was assessed in 6 practices with 49 general practitioners using a pre-consultation health needs questionnaire, consultation length as a process measure (previously shown to be a proxy measure for quality) and a post-consultation satisfaction/outcome measure which contained a subset of six questions assessing whether patients felt enabled by their consultation. This report describes secondary analysis of the available dataset undertaken to explore whether the approach used to evaluate quality of care for patients with specific clinical problems could be extended to the generality of general practice consultations. 2. Chapters 1 and 2 of the report describe earlier work developing both the concepts and instruments used in the Shadow Evaluation, and general findings already reported. The reliability and the construct validity of the measure of enablement are examined and found to be satisfactory. 3. Strong correlations between more time at consultations and more enablement for more patients are found at population level for patients with psychological problems, with social problems and with physical problems. More complex problems require more time to achieve equal benefit. 4. Mean consultation length and mean enablement score correlate well with each other and can be used as summary statistics of quality. Where trends require explanation or exploration, other measures of the use of time and the level of benefit gained are more helpful; both sets of analyses can be derived from the same datasets (Chapter 3). 5. Analyses at practice level show that practices which spend more time at consultations enable patients more whatever the nature of problems presented. The rank orders of time spent at consultation and of enablement are highly correlated (Chapter 4). 6. Analyses at doctor level show that doctors who spend more time at consultations enable patients more and that those who spend less time enable patients less. The numbers of patients available for study were not sufficient to explore this association within subgroups of clinical presentations. As in previous studies, we found that doctors who take longer time are likely to be more patient centred, and those who take less time are likely to be less patient centred. Case-mix varies between doctors, but seems to be independent of whether a doctor is more or less patient centred (Chapter 5). 7. The methods developed in this study give useful insights into the definition and delivery of quality of care in general practice (Chapter 6). The measures now need to be tested in different clinical, cultural and organizational settings and results compared with those found using routinely available NHS data on prescribing and achievement of other clinical and management targets (Chapter 7).     

Attitudes towards the content of general practice teaching

In a study of attitudes towards the content of general practice teaching, it was found that there was good agreement between fifth year medical students and their general practitioner tutors. The social aspects of illness were considered the most important by students and both groups emphasized the value of seeing patients in their homes with time for discussion of cases. These findings are discussed in the context of the development of teaching in general practice at Glasgow University.