Transmission characteristics of suspension seats in multi-axis vibration environments

The multi-axis vibration transmission characteristics of selected suspension seats were investigated in the laboratory. Subjects were exposed to a flat acceleration spectrum and two low frequency signals extracted from multi-axis acceleration data recorded at the floor of a passenger locomotive. Triaxial accelerations were measured at the floor of the vibration table and at the interfaces between the subject and mounted seat (seat pan and seat back). The transmission ratios between the overall seat pan and seat back accelerations and floor accelerations provided an effective tool for evaluating the effects of measurement site, vibration direction, and posture among the selected seating systems. The results showed that the system transfer matrix, estimated using a multiple-input/single-output model, would be less than ideal for predicting low frequency operational seat vibration when using suspension seats. The Seat Effective Amplitude Transmissibility (SEAT), estimated for the tested locomotive seats, was used to predict the weighted seat pan accelerations and Vibration Total Values for assessing a 1-h operational exposure in accordance with ISO 2631-1: 1997.

Relevance to industry

Multi-axis SEAT values can be estimated for seating systems tested in the laboratory using representative operational exposures. These values can be applied to monitored vehicle floor accelerations to target potentially harmful vibration in accordance with ISO 2631-1: 1997, assuming the operational exposures have similar frequency and magnitude characteristics. The transmission at the seat back should be considered when substantial low frequency multi-axis vibration is present.     

Some observations regarding the vibrational environment in child safety seats

A growing issue in the area of vehicular ride comfort is that of child safety seats. Postural, thermal and vibrational comfort considerations are finding their way into child seat design. This paper makes some observations regarding the current state of child safety seat design, then goes on to present the results of vibration tests performed over two road surfaces using two child seats and two children. The vibration levels measured at the interfaces between the children and their seats were found to be higher than the vibration levels between the driver and the driver's seat. Calculated power spectral densities and acceleration transmissibility functions showed that the vibration transmission characteristics of the coupled system consisting of the automobile seat, child seat and child were different from those of the driver/seat system. Whereas, automobile seats normally reduce vibrational disturbances at most frequencies, the child seats tested amplified vibration at most frequencies up to 60 Hz.     

Transmission of vertical vibration through a seat: Effect of thickness of foam cushions at the seat pan and the backrest

The perception of vehicle ride comfort is influenced by the dynamic performance of full-depth foam used in many vehicle seats. The effects of the thickness of foam on the dynamic stiffness (i.e., stiffness and damping as a function of frequency) of foam cushions with three thicknesses (60, 80, and 100 mm), and the vibration transmitted through these cushions at the seat pan and the backrest were measured with 12 subjects (6 males and 6 females). With increasing thickness, the stiffness and the damping of the foam decreased. With increasing thickness of foam at the seat pan, the resonance frequencies around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line and fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the seat pan cushion and the backrest cushion decreased. For the conditions investigated, it is concluded that the thickness of foam at a vertical backrest has little effect on the vertical in-line or fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibilities of the foam at either the seat pan or the backrest. The frequencies of the primary resonances around 4 Hz in the vertical in-line transmissibility and the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of foam at the seat pan were highly correlated. Compared to sitting on a rigid seat pan with a foam backrest, sitting with foam at both the seat pan and the backrest reduced the resonance frequency in the vertical in-line transmissibility of the backrest foam and increased the associated transmissibility at resonance, while the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the backrest was little affected. Compared to sitting without a backrest, sitting with a rigid vertical backrest increased the resonance frequency of the fore-and-aft cross-axis transmissibility of the seat pan cushion and increased the transmissibility at resonance.Relevance to industryThe transmissibility of a seat is determined by the dynamic properties of the occupant of the seat and the dynamic properties of the seat. This study shows how the thicknesses of foam at a seat pan and foam at a backrest affect the in-line and cross-axis transmissibilities of the foams at the seat pan and the backrest. The findings have application to the design of vehicle seats to minimise the transmission of vibration to the body.     

Comparison of whole-body vibration exposures in buses: effects and interactions of bus and seat design

Bus and seat design may be important for the drivers' whole-body vibration (WBV). WBV exposures in buses during actual operation were assessed. WBV attenuation performance between an air-suspension seat and a static pedestal seat in low-floor buses was compared; there were no differences in WBV attenuation between the seats. Air-suspension seat performance in a high-floor and low-floor bus was compared. Relative to the pedestal seat with its relatively static, limited travel seat suspension, the air-suspension seat with its dynamic, longer travel suspension provided little additional benefit. Relative to the measurement collected at the bus floor, the air-suspension seat amplified the WBV exposures in the high-floor bus. All WBV exposures were below European Union (EU) daily exposure action values. The EU Vibration Directive only allows the predominant axis of vibration exposure to be evaluated but a tri-axial vector sum exposure may be more representative of the actual health risks.     

Vibration attenuation performance of suspension seats for off-road forestry vehicles

Four different types of vertical suspension seats were evaluated in the laboratory and in the field in order to measure their adaptability for attenuating whole-body vibration in log skidders used in the forest industry. Laboratory testing first consisted of determining the static and dynamic characteristics of the seats such as the static stiffness of the cushions and suspension systems and the hysteresis parameters and damping properties of the cushions. The vibration attenuation characteristics of the seats were then measured using a laboratory test rig simulating a driver work station. The influence of amplitude of excitation and the variations in seat height on the vibration attenuation performance of the suspension seats was evaluated for sinusoidal excitations in the frequency range of 0.2–8.0 Hz. The seats were then field tested during normal skidding operations to determine their vertical transmissibility characteristics and to compare the vibration exposure that results from operating a skidder while being equipped with a suspended seat, as opposed to having an unsuspended one. There was generally good agreement between the transmissibility characteristics measured in the laboratory and in the field. The results of vibration transmissibility and exposure are helpful in identifying one of the suspension seats as being the most appropriate for attenuating vertical whole-body vibration on skidders, while conforming at the same time to the basic dimensional characteristics and stability required for safe operation of such vehicles.     

The impact of different seats and whole-body vibration exposures on truck driver vigilance and discomfort

Laboratory studies have shown that exposure to whole-body vibration (WBV) increases physical and mental fatigue, which are common issues professional drivers face. The objective of this study was to determine whether altering WBV exposures had any effect on driver vigilance and discomfort. A repeated measures crossover design of five truck drivers with regular 10-h routes was used. Active and passive suspension truck seats were evaluated. For each seat, WBV exposures were measured. Participants completed a discomfort questionnaire and a reaction time task before and after their shift for two weeks, one week per seat. Compared with the passive seat, the active seat significantly reduced WBV exposures, decrements in the optimal and mean reaction times (p = 0.02, 0.047, respectively), and discomfort in the lower back and wrist(s)/forearm(s) (p < 0.01, 0.01, respectively). Study results indicated that reducing WBV helps reduce discomfort and maintain vigilance, which may improve drivers’ health and reduce the risk of truck collisions.

Practitioner Summary: The active suspension seat used in this study reduced truck drivers’ exposure to whole-body vibration (WBV) by over 33% in relation to their current industry standard passive suspension seat. This study demonstrated that reducing truck drivers’ exposure to WBV reduced fatigue and discomfort development over a workday.     

Whole body vibration exposures in forklift operators: comparison of a mechanical and air suspension seat

Using a repeated measures design, this study compared differences in whole body vibration (WBV) exposures when 12 forklift operators drove the same forklift with a mechanical suspension and an air suspension seat. A portable PDA-based WBV data acquisition system collected and analysed time-weighted and raw WBV data per ISO 2631-1 and 2631-5 WBV measurement standards. Tri-axial measurements of weighted vibration (A(w)), crest factor, vibration dose values, time-weighted average-peak, raw (+) peak, raw (-) peak and static compression dose (S(ed)) were compared between seats. There were significant differences in z-axis WBV exposures with the air suspension seat, yielding lower WBV exposures. In addition, there were differences between seats in how they attenuated WBV exposures based on the driver's weight. In the mechanical suspension seat, WBV exposures were weight-dependent, with lighter drivers having higher WBV exposures, whereas with the air suspension seat, the same trends were not as prevalent. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: This study contributes to the understanding of how different seat suspensions can influence WBV transmission and how some components of vibration transmission are dependent on the weight of the driver. Additional systematic studies are needed to quantify how various factors can influence WBV exposures.     

Intervention on seat adjustment among drivers of forest tractors

The aim of this study was to clarify the ergonomics of forest tractor drivers' sitting conditions, to study how well drivers had adjusted the seats of forest tractors and to study the short-term effect of the backrest adjustment and the use of accessory lumbar support on neck-shoulder and low-back symptoms of drivers. The subjects in this field study were 100 male forest tractor drivers aged 21–50 years (37 ± 7 years) from central and eastern Finland. The drivers were visited twice, and a two-week intervention on seat adjustment was carried out between the visits. The methods used were interview and assessment of the seat. The height and inclination of the seat, inclination of the backrest and the stiffness of the spring were measured; after the measurements, the technician adjusted the seat. Half of the drivers were given an accessory lumbar support (Camp 21025) and advice concerning its use. Pain, stiffness and fatigue of the low-back and neck-shoulder at the end of the shift were reported to have diminished among nearly all drivers. There were no differences between the intervention groups regardless of whether the inclination of the backrest was adjusted or not or whether the drivers had used the lumbar support or not during the two-week intervention period. Relevance to industryThe results of this study can be taken into account when improvements are made in the ergonomics of the seats of forest tractors.     

Review of anthropometric considerations for tractor seat design

Tractor driving imposes a lot of physical and mental stress upon the operator. If the operator's seat is not comfortable, his work performance may be poor and there is also a possibility of accidents. The optimal design of tractor seat may be achieved by integrating anthropometric data with other technical features of the design. This paper reviews the existing information on the tractor seat design that considers anthropometry and biomechanical factors and gives an approach for seat design based on anthropometric data. The anthropometric dimensions, i.e. popliteal height sitting (5th percentile), hip breadth sitting (95th percentile), buttock popliteal length (5th percentile), interscye breadth (5th and 95th percentile) and sitting acromion height (5th percentile) of agricultural workers need to be taken into consideration for design of seat height, seat pan width, seat pan length, seat backrest width and seat backrest height, respectively, of a tractor. The seat dimensions recommended for tractor operator's comfort based on anthropometric data of 5434 Indian male agricultural workers were as follows: seat height of 380 mm, seat pan width of 420–450 mm, seat backrest width of 380–400 mm (bottom) and 270–290 mm (top), seat pan length of 370±10 mm, seat pan tilt of 5–7° backward and seat backrest height of 350 mm.

Relevance to industry

The approach presented in this paper for tractor seat design based on anthropometric considerations will help the tractor seat designers to develop and introduce seats suiting to the requirements of the user population. This will not only enhance the comfort of the tractor operators but may also help to reduce the occupational health problems of tractor operators.     

Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part I): Use of subjective ratings in discriminating car seats and correspondence among ratings

Several subjective rating schemes were investigated to determine which might be the most effective for use in designing and evaluating car seats, and what relationships exist among these schemes. Participants (n=27) completed short-term driving sessions, in six combinations of seats (from vehicles ranked high and low on overall comfort), vehicle class (sedan and SUV), and driving venue (lab-based and field). Overall ratings were obtained, as well as separate measures of comfort and discomfort of the whole body and local body parts. No association was found between subjective ratings and a publicly available overall vehicle comfort score (J.D. Power and Associates’ Comfort Score), implying that other factors besides sitting comfort/discomfort (and car seats) account for overall vehicle comfort. Other major results were that contemporary car seats appear to best accommodate those of middle stature, that packages/seats of sedans were preferred over those of SUVs, that separate processes appeared to be involved in determining whole body comfort and discomfort, and that ratings of comfort were most effective at differentiating among the car seats. Finally, a scheme for the use of subjective ratings was suggested: discomfort ratings for ensuring basic seat requirements (pain prevention-oriented) and comfort ratings for promoting advanced seat requirements (pleasure promotion-oriented).

Relevance to industry

Evidence regarding the advantages and disadvantages of different subjective rating schemes can facilitate future design and evaluation of automotive seats.     

Evaluation of subjective responses to whole-body vibration exposure: Effect of frequency content

The relationship between the subjective ride comfort in a vehicle seat and whole-body vibration can be modeled using frequency weightings and rms averaging as specified in ISO 2631-1. If two vibrating environments have the same frequency-weighted rms acceleration value using this method, it is assumed that the two environments would have the same degree of discomfort. In recent years, it has been found that when subjects are exposed to random whole-body vibration, even with the same frequency-weighted rms acceleration signals according to the ISO 2631-1 standard which consists of different frequency spectra will elicit different degree of comfort. From the viewpoint of this result, it is doubtful whether frequency-weighting based on ISO 2631-1 is appropriate for such vibrations.

In this paper, the alternative approach which Miwa's proposed VG method modified was examined. The following conclusion was suggested: VG_t value which was obtained by the alternative approach seems to be appropriate from random vibrations which have same frequency-weighted rms acceleration with different frequency components. The alternative approach based on the VG method has wider applicability but requires more researches.

Relevance to industry

Few researchers have demonstrated the problem of the frequency-weighting method of the ISO 2631-1 standard. This may have implications to current used ISO frequency-weighting method for evaluating the comfort on the vehicle seats. Therefore, comfortable evaluation of the vehicle seats vibration by the amount of frequency-weighted rms acceleration values obtained by the ISO 2631-1 standard takes cautions.     

Ergonomics modelling and evaluation of automobile seat comfort

Automobile seats are developed in an iterative manner because subjective feedback, which is usually of questionable quality, drives the design. The time and cost associated with iteration could be justified if the process was guaranteed to produce a comfortable seat. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Current practices are based on the premise that seat system design teams need objective, measurable laboratory standards, which can be linked to subjective perceptions of comfort. Only in this way can predictions be made regarding whether or not a particular design will be viewed by the consumer as comfortable. This type of forecasting ability would effectively improve the efficiency with which automobile seats are designed. In this context, the research reported, developed, and validated a stepwise, multiple linear regression model relating seat interface pressure characteristics, occupant anthropometry, occupant demographics, and perceptions of seat appearance to an overall, subjective comfort index derived from a survey with proven levels of reliability and validity. The model performance statistics were: adjusted r(2)=0.668, standard error of estimate=2.308, F (6, 38)=15.728, p=0.000, and cross-validated r (15)=0.952, p=0.000. From the model, human criteria for seat interface pressure measures were established. These findings could not have been attained without first demonstrating that (1) the data collection protocol for seat interface pressure measurement was repeatable and (2) seat interface pressure measurements can be used to distinguish between seats.     

Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors

Judgements of overall seating comfort in dynamic conditions sometimes correlate better with the static characteristics of a seat than with measures of the dynamic environment. This study developed qualitative models of overall seat discomfort to include both static and dynamic seat characteristics. A dynamic factor that reflected how vibration discomfort increased as vibration magnitude increased was combined with a static seat factor which reflected seating comfort without vibration. The ability of the model to predict the relative and overall importance of dynamic and static seat characteristics on comfort was tested in two experiments. A paired comparison experiment, using four polyurethane foam cushions (50, 70, 100, 120 mm thick), provided different static and dynamic comfort when 12 subjects were exposed to one-third octave band random vertical vibration with centre frequencies of 2.5 and 5.5 Hz, at magnitudes of 0.00, 0.25 and 0.50 m x s(-2) rms measured beneath the foam samples. Subject judgements of the relative discomfort of the different conditions depended on both static and dynamic characteristics in a manner consistent with the model. The effect of static and dynamic seat factors on overall seat discomfort was investigated by magnitude estimation using three foam cushions (of different hardness) and a rigid wooden seat at six vibration magnitudes with 20 subjects. Static seat factors (i.e. cushion stiffness) affected the manner in which vibration influenced the overall discomfort: cushions with lower stiffness were more comfortable and more sensitive to changes in vibration magnitude than those with higher stiffness. The experiments confirm that judgements of overall seat discomfort can be affected by both the static and dynamic characteristics of a seat, with the effect depending on vibration magnitude: when vibration magnitude was low, discomfort was dominated by static seat factors; as the vibration magnitude increased, discomfort became dominated by dynamic factors.     

Whole-body vibration: Measurement of horizontal and vertical transmissibility of an agricultural tractor seat

The seats may significantly reduce the exposures levels transmitted to the driver, but the European Directive 2002/44/EC (2002) requires only tests on the damping seat capacity along the vertical direction, whereas nothing is required for the longitudinal and transversal directions.Field tests were carried out using a 93 kW tractor to verify the vibrational comfort values given by seat with pneumatic suspension. The tests were executed with the tractor running on different surfaces, at two different forward speed and tire pressures and with different tractor masses. Three repetition were carried out for each configuration. Accelerations were always measured on both the seat and the cabin platform and the calculations were done using the ISO 2631 standard suggestions. The vibration total values and the acceleration transmissibility along the 3 perpendicular axes were calculated and analysed.Despite different boundary conditions (surface, tire pressure, forward speed and tractor mass distribution), along the Z axis the transmissibility was constantly around 0.7, to confirm that the seat worked well to damp the vertical exposures. Different were the situations for the X and the Y axes. Excluding the asphalt, on the other crossed surfaces high transmissibility values were observed (never less than 1), especially along the X axis.Relevance to industry. This paper describes the vibration transmissibility of an agricultural tractor seat. Tests were carried out with the tractor running on different surfaces and with different configurations. The seat transmissibility along the three orthogonal directions was acquired.Results suggest that the tractor manufacturer should consider, during the machine design, also the rolling and pitching movements, because the seat accelerations along the X and Y axes are influenced by them. The seat manufacturer could reduce the rolling and pitching effects using specific suspension systems along the horizontal and lateral directions.     

Age-related difference in perceptual responses and interface pressure requirements for driver seat design

Due to typical physiological changes with age, older individuals are likely to have different perceptual responses to and different needs for driver–seat interface design. To assess this, a study was conducted in which a total of 22 younger and older participants completed six short-term driving sessions. Three subjective ratings (comfort, discomfort and overall) were obtained, along with 36 driver–seat interface pressure measures, and were used to assess differences and similarities between the two age groups. For both age groups, localised comfort ratings were more effective at distinguishing between driver seats and workspaces. Older individuals appeared to be less sensitive to discomfort than younger individuals. Across age groups, two distinct processes were used in determining whole-body comfort and discomfort perceptions based on localised comfort/discomfort perceptions. Whole-body discomfort levels were largely affected by lower back discomfort in the younger group versus upper back discomfort in the older group. Four specific pressure measures at several body regions differed between the age groups, suggesting distinct contract pressure requirements and loading patterns among these groups.     

Coach design for the Korean high-speed train: a systematic approach to passenger seat design and layout

Proper ergonomic design of a passenger seat and coach layout for a high-speed train is an essential component that is directly related to passenger comfort. In this research, a systematic approach to the design of passenger seats was described and the coach layout which reflected the tradeoff between transportation capacity and passenger comfort was investigated for the Korean high-speed train. As a result, design recommendations and specifications of the passenger seat and its layout were suggested. The whole design process is composed of four stages. A survey and analysis of design requirement was first conducted, which formed the base for designing the first and second class passenger seats. Prototypes were made and evaluated iteratively, and seat arrangement and coach layout were finally obtained. The systematic approach and recommendations suggested in this study are expected to be applicable to the seat design for public transportations and to help modify and redesign existing vehicular seats.     

Haptic perceptions in the vehicle seat

The perceptual overloads of visually and auditorily based information and their interference phenomena within vehicles led to research for the applicability of haptically based information and the haptic interfaces to intelligent vehicles. Because seats are the interface that touches the largest area of the driver's body, the driver's seat in vehicles has been the focus of a promising haptic interface that can improve the safety of drivers and the effectiveness and efficiency of the information transfer between vehicles and drivers. This study aims to provide practical guidelines as a building block for designing the haptic (or vibrotactile) interface in a vehicle's driver's seat by investigating, through four experiments, 1) proper intensity of vibration, 2) minimum distance of spatially distinguishable vibrations, 3) proper position and direction of vibration, and 4) proper rhythm of vibration. Twenty participants took part in the experiments, which were conducted in driving simulation environments. These environments consisted of a real car seat, commercial vibration actuators (i.e., the eccentric motors), and a monitor that showed scenes of the road while driving. This study recommended the proper intensity (approximately 26 to 34 Hz and 2.0 to 3.4 G), position (seat pan or back support), direction (horizontal or indirect), intervibration distance (8 to 9 cm), and rhythm of vibration (3‐s duration with 0.5‐s interval), and showed how the characteristics of drivers, such as gender and age, had effects on setting the design variables of the haptic interface in the vehicle seat. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The application of SEAT values for predicting how compliant seats with backrests influence vibration discomfort

The extent to which a seat can provide useful attenuation of vehicle vibration depends on three factors: the characteristics of the vehicle motion, the vibration transmissibility of the seat, and the sensitivity of the body to vibration. The ‘seat effective amplitude transmissibility’ (i.e., SEAT value) reflects how these three factors vary with the frequency and the direction of vibration so as to predict the vibration isolation efficiency of a seat. The SEAT value is mostly used to select seat cushions or seat suspensions based on the transmission of vertical vibration to the principal supporting surface of a seat. This study investigated the accuracy of SEAT values in predicting how seats with backrests influence the discomfort caused by multiple-input vibration. Twelve male subjects participated in a four-part experiment to determine equivalent comfort contours, the relative discomfort, the location of discomfort, and seat transmissibility with three foam seats and a rigid reference seat at 14 frequencies of vibration in the range 1–20 Hz at magnitudes of vibration from 0.2 to 1.6 ms⁻² r.m.s. The ‘measured seat dynamic discomfort’ (MSDD) was calculated for each foam seat from the ratio of the vibration acceleration required to cause similar discomfort with the foam seat and with the rigid reference seat. Using the frequency weightings in current standards, the SEAT values of each seat were calculated from the ratio of overall ride values with the foam seat to the overall ride values with the rigid reference seat, and compared to the corresponding MSDD at each frequency. The SEAT values provided good predictions of how the foam seats increased vibration discomfort at frequencies around the 4-Hz resonance but reduced vibration discomfort at frequencies greater than about 6.3 Hz, with discrepancies explained by a known limitation of the frequency weightings.     

The effect of seat back inclination on spine height changes

The effect of backrest inclination on spinal height changes was tested during static sitting and seated whole-body vibrations. The vibration input was sinusoidal with a frequency of 5 Hz and an acceleration of 0.1 g rms. The backrest inclinations tested were 110 degrees and 120 degrees . The 110 degrees backrest caused less shrinkage than did the 120 degrees during static sitting, whereas the opposite was true when vibration was present, although the differences between the backrests were not statistically significant. Only when the results were compared with results from exposure to unsupported sitting were the differences statistically significant for both static sitting and seated vibrations when the 110 degrees backrest was used and for vibration with the 120 degrees backrest. Thus we conclude that an inclined backrest reduces the effects of vibration. More importantly, emphasis should be placed upon seats and seat materials that can attenuate vibration.     

Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part II): Relationships with and prediction from interface pressure

Pressure at the driver–seat interface has been used as an objective method to assess seat design, yet existing evidence regarding its efficacy is mixed. The current study examined associations between three subjective ratings (overall, comfort, and discomfort) and 36 measures describing driver–seat interface pressure, and identified pressure level, contact area, and ratio (local to global) variables that could be effectively used to improve subjective responses. Each of 27 participants was involved in six separate driving sessions which included combinations of two seats (from vehicles ranked high and low on overall comfort), two vehicle classes (sedan and SUV), and two driving venues (lab-based and field). Several pressure variables were identified as more effective for assessing sitting comfort and discomfort across a range of individual statures. Based on the results, specific approaches are recommended to improve the sitting experience: (1) lower pressure ratios at the buttocks and higher pressure ratios at the upper and lower back; and (2) balanced pressure between the bilateral buttocks, and between the lower and upper body. Finally, separate analyses supported that human–seat interface pressure was more strongly related with overall and comfort ratings than with discomfort ratings.

Relevance to industry

Several interface pressure variables were identified that showed associations with subjective responses during sitting. Use of these measures is suggested to improve the quality of car seats.