Fast Initial Response for CUSUM Quality-Control Schemes: Give Your CUSUM A Head Start

The fast initial response (FIR) feature for cumulative sum (CUSUM) quality-control schemes permits a more rapid response to an initial out-of-control situation than does a standard CUSUM quality-control scheme. This feature is especially valuable at start-up or after a CUSUM has given an out-of-control signal. This article presents the average run length and the distribution of run length for CUSUM schemes with the FIR feature and compares FIR CUSUM schemes to standard CUSUM schemes. The comparisons show that if the process starts out in control, the fast initial response feature has little effect; however, if the process mean is not at the desired level, an out-of-control signal will be given faster when the FIR feature is used.     

A Neural Network Method for Modelling the Parameters of a CUSUM Chart

The cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart is widely employed in quality control to monitor a process or to evaluate historic data. CUSUM charts are designed to exhibit acceptable average run lengths both when the process is in and out of control. This paper introduces a functional technique for generating the parameters h and k for such a chart that will have specified average run lengths. It employs the method of artificial neural networks to derive the appropriate coefficients. An EXCEL spreadsheet to assist computing the parameters is presented.     

On the effectiveness of the unit sample size for standard control charts: ARL VS. Aurl

In this paper we investigate the use of the average unit run length (AURL) as an important measure of the effectiveness of various quality control charting schemes. In particular we focus on its appropriateness for normally distributed processes that tend to produce units (or measurements) at slow rates. In our investigations with the standard Shewhart X? and R charts, as well as the CUSUM chart, AURL shows that a sample size of n=1 can yield the fastest means of detecting shifts.     

Using CUSUM Control Schemes for Monitoring Quality Levels in Compound Poisson Production Environment: The Geometric Poisson Process

In contemporary modern and high volume production environments such as wafer manufacturing, a small sustained shift is not very easily detected in a short period of time, but may have a great impact on a manufacturing process. Thus, it is important to be able to detect and identify a small sustained shift of the production process in a timely manner and correct the undesired situation. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) control scheme is considered to be one of the efficient reference tools in detecting a small structure change in a process. However, for control of defects in a production process, too often the assumption is made that the defects follow a Poisson distribution. In practice, the process is more complex and the distributions of defects are more appropriately modeled by the compound Poisson distribution. In this paper, the underlying distribution is the geometric Poisson distribution, a Poisson distribution compounded by a geometric distribution, and the CUSUM control scheme based on the geometric Poisson process is addressed. An effective CUSUM control scheme can provide an adequate average run length (ARL), that can be obtained from the probability transition matrix for the Markov chain proposed by Brook and Evans (1972). With proper ARL selected, the geometric Poisson CUSUM control scheme is developed for process control.     

Progressive Mean Control Chart for Monitoring Process Location Parameter

Control charts are widely used for process monitoring. They show whether the variation is due to common causes or whether some of the variation is due to special causes. To detect large shifts in the process, Shewhart‐type control charts are preferred. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts are generally used to detect small and moderate shifts. Shewhart‐type control charts (without additional tests) use only current information to detect special causes, whereas CUSUM and EWMA control charts also use past information. In this article, we proposed a control chart called progressive mean (PM) control chart, in which a PM is used as a plotting statistic. The proposed chart is designed such that it uses not only the current information but also the past information. Therefore, the proposed chart is a natural competitor for the classical CUSUM, the classical EWMA and some recent modifications of these two charts. The conclusion of this article is that the performance of the proposed PM chart is superior to the compared ones for small and moderate shifts, and its performance for large shifts is better (in terms of the average run length). Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Computing the Percentage Points of the Run-Length Distributions of Multivariate CUSUM Control Charts

Multivariate CUSUM control charts are often used instead of the standard Hotelling's control charts in many practical problems when detection of small shifts in the process mean is important. However, design of multivariate CUSUM control charts are usually based on the average run length (ARL). In this work, we will compute the percentage points of the run-length distributions of two multivariate CUSUM control charts. It will be shown that interpretations based on ARL can be misleading since the in-control run-length distribution of a multivariate CUSUM is highly skewed. On the other hand, the percentage points of the run-length distribution provide additional information such as the median run length, early false out-of-control signals, and the skewness of the run-length distribution for a particular scheme. These extra information might provide quality control engineers further knowledge of a particular multivariate CUSUM control chart scheme.     

Improving the performance of CUSUM charts

The control chart is an important statistical technique that is used to monitor the quality of a process. Shewhart control charts are used to detect larger disturbances in the process parameters, whereas CUSUM and EWMA charts are meant for smaller and moderate changes. Runs rules schemes are generally used to enhance the performance of Shewhart control charts. In this study, we propose two runs rules schemes for the CUSUM charts. The performance of these two schemes is compared with the usual CUSUM, the weighted CUSUM, the fast initial response CUSUM and the usual EWMA schemes. The comparisons revealed that the proposed schemes perform better for small and moderate shifts, whereas they reasonably maintain their efficiency for large shifts as well. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A Group of Moving Averages Control Plan for Signaling Varying Location Shifts

Control plans consisting of a group of moving averages (GMA plans) of various sizes are proposed for monitoring processes. Since moving averages of different sizes retain several levels of memory of past observations, these plans have good average run length (ARL) properties over a range of location shifts. The ARLs of GMA plans are compared with the conventional cumulative sum and the exponentially weighted moving average procedures.     

A distribution-free tabular CUSUM chart for autocorrelated data

A distribution-free tabular CUSUM chart called DFTC is designed to detect shifts in the mean of an autocorrelated process. The chart's Average Run Length (ARL) is approximated by generalizing Siegmund's ARL approximation for the conventional tabular CUSUM chart based on independent and identically distributed normal observations. Control limits for DFTC are computed from the generalized ARL approximation. Also discussed are the choice of reference value and the use of batch means to handle highly correlated processes. The performance of DFTC compared favorably with that of other distribution-free procedures in stationary test processes having various types of autocorrelation functions as well as normal or nonnormal marginals.     

Robust CUSUM Control Charting for Process Dispersion

Process monitoring through control charts is a quite popular practice in statistical process control. From a statistical point of view, a superior control chart is one that has an efficient design structure, but having resistance against unusual situations is of more practical importance. To have a compromise between the statistical and practical purposes, a natural desire is to have a control chart that can serve both purposes simultaneously in a good capacity. This study is planned for the same objective focusing on monitoring the dispersion parameter by using a Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) control chart scheme. We investigate the properties of the design structure of different control charts based on some already existing estimators as well as some new robust dispersion estimators. By evaluating the performance of these estimators‐based CUSUM control charts in terms of average run length, we identify those charts that are more capable to make a good compromise between the aforementioned purposes in terms of statistical and practical needs. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Control charting methods for autocorrelated cyber vulnerability data

Control charting cyber vulnerabilities is challenging because the same vulnerabilities can remain from period to period. Also, hosts (personal computers, servers, printers, etc.) are often scanned infrequently and can be unavailable during scanning. To address these challenges, control charting of the period-to-period demerits per host using a hybrid moving centerline residual-based and adjusted demerit (MCRAD) chart is proposed. The intent is to direct limited administrator resources to unusual cases when automatic patching is insufficient. The proposed chart is shown to offer superior average run length performance compared with three alternative methods from the literature. The methods are illustrated using three datasets.     

DETECTING EFFECTIVENESS MEASURED BY AURL

This communication addresses the problem of comparing the effectiveness of different control-charting schemes. The measure of average unit run length (AURL) is used to compare the effectiveness of the x-bar charts and the R charts with different sampling frequencies and different sample sizes. Since the trade-off between the frequency of false alarm and the detecting effectiveness is the most critical issue in the design of the control charts, we adjust the control limits of the charts in order to conduct the fair comparisons based on equal frequency of false alarm. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.