The role of angiotensin AT1 receptors in the diuretic, natriuretic, kaliuretic and blood pressure responses induced by angiotensin II activation of the median preoptic nucleus in conscious rats

We determined the effects of two classical angiotensin II (ANG II) antagonists, [Sar1, Ala8]-ANG II and [Sar1, Thr8]-ANG II, and losartan (a nonpeptide and selective antagonist for the AT1 angiotensin receptors) on diuresis, natriuresis, kaliuresis and arterial blood pressure induced by ANG II administration into the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO) of male Holtzman rats weighing 250-300 g. Urine was collected in rats submitted to a water load (5% body weight) 1 h later. The volume of the drug solutions injected was 0.5 microliters over 10-15 s. Pre-treatment with [Sar1, Ala8]-ANG II (12 rats) and [Sar1, Thr8]-ANG II (9 rats), at the dose of 60 ng reduced (13.7 +/- 1.0 vs 11.0 +/0 1.0 and 10.7 +/0 1.2, respectively), whereas losartan (14 rats) at the dose of 160 ng totally blocked (13.7 +/- 1.0 vs 7.6 +/- 1.5) the urine excretion induced by injection o 12 ng of ANG II (14 rats). [Sar1, Ala8]-ANG II impaired Na+ excretion (193 +/- 16 vs 120 +/- 19), whereas [Sar1, Thr8]-ANG II and losartan block Na+ excretion (193 +/- 16 vs 77 +/- 15 and 100 +/- 12, respectively) induced by ANG II. Similar effects induced by ANG II on K+ excretion were observed with [Sar1, Ala8]-ANG II, [Sar1, Thr8]- ANG II, and losartan pretreatment (133 +/- 18 vs 108 +/- 11, 80 +/- 12, and 82 +/- 15, respectively). The same doses as above of [Sar1, Ala8]-ANG II (8 rats), [Sar1, Thr8]-ANG II (8 rats), and losartan (9 rats) blocked the increase in the arterial blood pressure induced by 12 ng of ANG II (12 rats) (32 +/- 4 vs 4 +/- 2, 3.5 +/- 1, and 2 +/- 1, respectively. The results indicate that the AT1 receptor subtype participates in the increases of diuresis, natriuresis, kaliuresis and arterial blood pressure induced by the administration of ANG II into the MnPO.     

7-D-ALA]-angiotensin 1-7 blocks renal actions of angiotensin 1-7 in the anesthetized rat

Exogenous angiotensin (Ang) 1-7 affects renal function, but the receptor(s) involved in this response remain(s) to be determined. In an in vitro preparation of proximal tubules, Ang 1-7 was shown to act on Ang II AT1 receptors (minor component), but also on a non-AT1, non-AT2 Ang receptor (major component) to inhibit reabsorption. In brain, Ang 1-7 also exerts effects mediated by a non-AT1, non-AT2 binding site; these effects are inhibited, however, by the angiotensin analog [7-D-Ala]-Ang 1-7. Therefore we tested the effect of Ang II AT1-receptor antagonist losartan and [7-D-Ala]-Ang 1-7 on the renal response to exogenous Ang 1-7 in standard renal-clearance experiments in the anesthetized rat. We found that Ang 1-7 (100 pmol/kg/min, i.a.) increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR), urinary flow rate (UV), and urinary sodium excretion (UNaV) without affecting mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) or urinary potassium excretion (UKV), confirming previous reports. Losartan (10 mg/kg, i.v.) blocked the pressor effect of exogenous Ang II (100 pmol/kg/min, i.a.), but did not significantly affect the renal response to Ang 1-7. Conversely, pretreatment with [7-D-Ala]-Ang 1-7 (5 nmol/kg/min) did not affect the pressor effect of Ang II, but abolished the renal response to Ang 1-7. Application of [7-D-Ala]-Ang 1-7 in the absence of exogenous Ang 1-7 did not alter MAP or GFR, but increased UNaV (by 52%). Our data indicate that similar to the response in brain, the renal response to exogenous Ang 1-7 may be mediated predominantly by a distinct non-AT1 binding site, which is sensitive to blockade by [7-D-Ala]-Ang 1-7. Furthermore, ambient endogenous Ang 1-7 acting on this distinct binding site may not contribute significantly to control of MAP or GFR, but exerts an antinatriuretic influence in the anesthetized rat.     

Angiotensin II inhibits glomerular adenylate cyclase via the angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 (AT1)

We examined the role of angiotensin II (AII) receptor subtypes in the regulation of hormone-stimulated cyclic AMP (cAMP) accumulation in isolated rat glomeruli. All inhibited cAMP formation induced by histamine, serotonin and parathyroid hormone, but not by prostaglandin E2 or calcitonin gene-related peptide. Angiotensin III but not the angiotensin fragments (1-7) and (3-8) also showed inhibitory activity. The inhibition of histamine-induced cAMP accumulation by AII was concentration-dependent and was absent in glomeruli isolated from pertussis toxin-treated rats. The effect of AII on histamine-induced cAMP levels was not mimicked by the protein kinase C activator, phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate, nor was the effect of AII inhibited by the protein kinase C inhibitors, staurosporine and H-7. The angiotensin II receptor subtype 1 (AT1) antagonists, SK&F 108566 and losartan, attenuated the inhibitory effect of AII on histamine-stimulated cAMP accumulation, whereas the AT2 selective antagonists, CGP 42112A, WL-19 and PD 123319, had no effect. Displacement of [125I]AII from glomerular membrane using the subtype-selective antagonists confirmed that the glomerular AII receptor has characteristics of an AT1 subtype. The results suggest that AII, through activation of the AT1 receptor, may act to maintain the contractile state of glomerular mesangial cells by attenuating the increase in cAMP levels induced by some hormones.     

Functional response of the rat kidney to inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis: role of cytochrome p450-derived arachidonate metabolites

1. We tested the hypothesis that nitric oxide (NO) exerts a tonic inhibitory influence on cytochrome P450 (CYP450)-dependent metabolism of arachidonic acid (AA). 2. N(omega)-nitro-L-Arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), increased mean blood pressure (MBP), from 91+/-6 to 137+/-5 mmHg, renal vascular resistance (RVR), from 9.9+/-0.6 to 27.4+/-2.5 mmHg ml(-1) min(-1), and reduced renal blood flow (RBF), from 9.8+/-0.7 to 6.5+/-0.6 ml min(-1)) and GFR from 1.2+/-0.2 to 0.6+/-0.2 ml 100 g(-1) min(-1)) accompanied by diuresis (UV, 1.7+/-0.3 to 4.3+/-0.8 microl 100 g(-1) min (-1)), and natriuresis (U(Na)V, 0.36+/-0.04 to 1.25+/-0.032 micromol 100 g(-1) min(-1)). 3. 12, 12 dibromododec-enoic acid (DBDD), an inhibitor of omega hydroxylase, blunted L-NAME-induced changes in MBP, RVR, UV and U(Na)V by 63+/-8, 70+/-5, 45+/-8 and 42+/-9%, respectively, and fully reversed the reduction in GFR by L-NAME. Clotrimazole, an inhibitor of the epoxygenase pathway of CYP450-dependent AA metabolism, was without effect. 4. BMS182874 (5-dimethylamino)-N-(3,4-dimethyl-5-isoxazolyl)-1-naphthalenesulfo namide), an endothelin (ET)A receptor antagonist, also blunted the increases in MBP and RVR and the diuresis/natriuresis elicited by L-NAME without affecting GFR. 5. Indomethacin blunted L-NAME-induced increases in RVR, UV and U(Na)V. BMS180291 (1S-(1alpha,2alpha,3alpha,4alpha)]-2-[[3-[4-[(++ +pentylamino)carbonyl]-2-oxazolyl]-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-yl ]methyl]benzenepropanoic acid), an endoperoxide receptor antagonist, attenuated the pressor and renal haemodynamic but not the renal tubular effects of L-NAME. 6. In conclusion, the renal functional effects of the CYP450-derived mediator(s) expressed after inhibition of NOS with L-NAME were prevented by inhibiting either CYP450 omega hydroxylase or cyclooxygenase or by antagonizing either ET(A) or endoperoxide receptors. 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE) fulfils the salient properties of this mediator.     

AT1 receptor subtype mediates the inhibitory effect of central angiotensin II on cerebrospinal fluid formation in the rat

The effect of central administration of angiotensin II (AII) on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) formation was studied in pentobarbital-anesthetized, artificially-ventilated rats. CSF production was measured by the ventriculocisternal perfusion method with Blue Dextran 2000 as the indicator. Baseline value of CSF production was 3.35 +/- 0.08 microliters/min. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of AII at rates of 0.5 and 5 pg/min significantly lowered (P < 0.01) CSF formation by 23% and 16%, respectively. In comparison, high peptide doses (50 and 500 pg/min) did not alter this parameter. The inhibitory effect of low AII doses on CSF formation was blocked by the i.c.v. AT1 receptor subtype antagonists, losartan and SK&F 108566 (2.4 and 2.7 ng/min, respectively), but not by the AT2 receptor subtype-specific agent, PD 123319 (3.8 ng/min). Peptide AII antagonists, [Sar1,Ile8]AII (5 ng/min), which binds to both AT1 and AT2 receptors, had a similar effect to those of AT1-specific blockers. It is concluded that AII, by controlling CSF formation, may influence the water and electrolyte balance in the brain.     

Angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin II stimulation of ciliary activity in human fallopian tube

Using an antibody (6313/G2) directed against a specific sequence in the extracellular domain of the type 1 angiotensin II receptor (AT1), we demonstrated the presence of angiotensin II (AII) receptors in human fallopian tube. Immunoperoxidase staining for AT1 receptor showed positive staining in the epithelium of the tubal mucosa. The intensity of staining varied depending upon the hormonal status at the time of salpingectomy, being strongest in the proliferative phase of the ovarian cycle and weakest after menopause. Ligand binding assay confirmed that the AII receptor concentration was highest in the mucosa of fallopian tubes from premenopausal women. Mucosa from the ampullary segment had higher concentrations of AII receptor than the fimbrial and isthmic segments in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Displacement studies using specific AII receptor subtype antagonists showed that approximately 60% of the total activity could be displaced by CGP42112B (type 2 specific) and 40% by losartan (AT1 specific). Immunoblotting confirmed that the antibody detected a protein of approximately 60 kDa. Functional studies showed that AII had a stimulatory action on tubal ciliary beat frequency, but had no significant effect on myosalpingseal activity. This effect was achieved at nanomolar concentrations of AII; further increases in the AII concentration were without additional effect. The stimulatory effect of AII was inhibited by the specific AT1 antagonist losartan, whereas the type 2 antagonist, CGP42112B, had no effect. The data demonstrate that AII may play an important role in ovum transport and fertility.     

Comparative pharmacology of recombinant rat AT1A, AT1B and human AT1 receptors expressed by transfected COS-M6 cells

1. Currently available antagonists and agonists cannot distinguish between angiotensin AT1 receptor subtypes. 2. We synthesized a series of compounds selected on the basis of having the most diverse structural features with respect to losartan (DuP753), the prototype non-peptide AT1 receptor antagonist. Using a radioligand-receptor binding assay and membranes prepared from COS-M6 cells transfected with individual AT1 receptor subtypes, we determined whether any of these compounds could distinguish between the receptor subtypes. 3. The diversity of the structural features of this series of compounds was reflected by the wide range of affinities (pIC50 values) displayed towards competing with [125I]-Sar1Ile8 angiotensin II for binding to the AT1 receptors. 4. Direct comparisons of the pIC50 values of individual compounds for rat AT1A, AT1B and human AT1 receptors revealed only minor differences. 5. It is concluded that compounds based structurally on losartan are unlikely to distinguish between these receptors.     

Platelet-activating factor mediates angiotensin II-induced proteinuria in isolated perfused rat kidney

Isolated kidney preparations (IPK) from male Sprague Dawley rats perfused at constant pressure were used to evaluate the effect of angiotensin II (AII) and platelet-activating factor (PAF) on renal function and urinary protein excretion. Compared with basal, intrarenal infusion of AII at 8 ng/min caused a progressive increase in protein excretion (11 +/- 6 versus 73 +/- 21 micrograms/min) in parallel with a decline in renal perfusate flow (RPF) (29 +/- 3 versus 18 +/- 3 ml/min). Addition to the perfusate of PAF at 50 nM final concentration also induced proteinuria (9 +/- 4 versus 55 +/- 14 micrograms/min) but did not change RPF (29 +/- 3 versus 30 +/- 3 ml/min). Preexposure of isolated kidneys to the PAF receptor antagonist WEB 2086 prevented the increase in urinary protein excretion induced by AII infusion (basal: 13 +/- 6; post-AII: 12 +/- 7 micrograms/min) but failed to prevent the vasoactive effect of AII (RPF, basal: 30 +/- 2; post-AII: 21 +/- 3 ml/min). In additional experiments, dexamethasone reduced the proteinuric effect of PAF remarkably. These results indicate that in isolated kidney preparation: (1) AII infusion induced proteinuria and decreased RPF; and (2) the effect of AII in enhancing urinary protein excretion was completely prevented by a specific PAF receptor antagonist, which, however, did not influence the AII-induced fall in RPF. It is suggested that PAF plays a major role in AII-induced changes in the permselective function of the glomerular capillary barrier.     

Smallness of the panmictic unit of Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae)

PURPOSE: To study the relationship between angiotensin II (AII) receptor occupancy ex vivo in tissues plasma concentration and hypotensive effect of a novel AII receptor antagonist, TH-142177 and losartan in rats. METHODS: At 2, 8 and 24 hr after oral administration of TH-142177 and losartan in rats, AII receptors in myocardium, adrenal cortex and cerebral cortex were determined by radioligand binding assay using [125I]Sar1,Ile8-AII. Plasma concentrations of both drugs and metabolite in rats were also measured using validated HPLC assays. Further, systolic blood pressure (SBP) in conscious renal hypertensive rats treated orally with TH-142177 and losartan were measured by using a tail cuff plethysmographic method. RESULTS: Oral administration of TH-142177 (1.8 and 5.5 micromol/kg) and losartan (6.5 and 21.7 micromol/kg) in rats brought about dose-dependent decreases in [125I]Sar1,Ile8-AII binding sites (Bmax) in myocardium and adrenal cortex. The extent of receptor occupancy by both drugs in adrenal cortex was maximal at 2 hr later but that in myocardium at 8 hr later. Further, the receptor occupancy was more sustained in myocardium than adrenal cortex. The ex vivo binding affinity of TH-142177 for AII receptors in these tissues was roughly three times higher than that of losartan. Also, cerebral cortical [125I]Sar1,Ile8-AII binding was significantly reduced by oral administration of losartan but not by TH-142177. The time course of AII receptor occupancy by both drugs in adrenal cortex appeared to be in parallel with that of their plasma concentrations, while the time course in myocardium correlated with that of their hypotensive effects rather than plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: TH-142177 produced a relatively selective and sustained occupancy ex vivo of AII receptors in myocardium and adrenal cortex of rats with approximately three times greater potency than losartan. Its time course of myocardial receptor occupancy was in parallel with that of hypotensive effect rather than plasma concentration.     

HR 720, a novel angiotensin receptor antagonist inhibits the angiotensin II-induced trophic effects, fibronectin release and fibronectin-EIIIA+ expression in rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro

The aim of this study was to evaluate the direct trophic effects of angiotensin II (AII) on rat vascular smooth muscle cells obtained from a single cellular isolate. Cell volume, protein synthesis, fibronectin (FN) release and FN-EIIIA+ mRNA isoform expression were analyzed in parallel. The effects of HR 720, a novel AT1 angiotensin receptor antagonist with some AT2 receptor affinity, were compared with those of selective AT1 antagonist EXP 3174. Both HR 720 and EXP 3174 inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner the maximum increase in cell volume induced by 10(-9) M Sar1-All (IC50 = 0.49 x 10(-9) M and 0.79 x 10(-9) M, respectively). Maximum [3H]leucine incorporation was also achieved at 10(-9) M All. HR 720 blocked the increase in protein synthesis with potency similar to EXP 3174; the respective IC50 values were 1.04 x 10(-9) M and 1.36 x 10(-9) M. All dose-dependently increased FN release, which was also equally inhibited by about 50% with both compounds at 10(-6) M. Furthermore, All enhanced FN-EIIIA+ mRNA in rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), which indicated a modulation of FN isoform expression which was inhibited by angiotensin II antagonists. In conclusion, All induced parallel and concentration-dependent increases in cell volume, protein synthesis, FN release and FN-EIIIA+ mRNA expression in vascular smooth muscle cells. These effects appeared to be essentially mediated by AT1 receptor stimulation as indicated by the equal inhibitory effects of HR 720 and EXP 3174.     

Up-regulation of angiotensin type 2 receptor mRNA by angiotensin II in rat cortical cells

The present experiment demonstrates that the exposure of angiotensin II (AII) produced an up-regulation of the AT2 receptor mRNA level in rat cortical cells. AII (10(-9)-10(-5) M) exerted a marked increase of AT2 receptor mRNA in a dose-dependent manner. The maximum increase was observed at 3 hr of AII stimulation and lasted 3 hr. The up-regulation of AT2 receptor mRNA was antagonized by PD123319, an AT2 receptor antagonist, but not by SC-52458, an AT1 receptor antagonist, thus suggesting that the increase in AT2 receptor mRNA is mediated via AT2 receptor. This increase is blocked by serine/threonine phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid, but not by the phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibitor sodium vanadate, thus suggesting the involvement of serine/threonine phosphatase in this process. Protein kinase C inhibitor, H-7 and calphostin C, did not inhibit the AII-induced up-regulation significantly. In addition, calcium ionophore, A23187 had no effect. These findings suggest that the AT2 receptor mRNA expression by AII is regulated by the activity of serine/threonine phosphatase in the cortical neurons. This observation is also the first example concerning the regulation of AT2 receptor within the brain.     

Inhibition of sympathetic outflow by the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, eprosartan, but not by losartan, valsartan or irbesartan: relationship to differences in prejunctional angiotensin II receptor blockade

It is well established that angiotensin II can enhance sympathetic nervous system function by activating prejunctional angiotensin II type I (AT1) receptors located on sympathetic nerve terminals. Stimulation of these receptors enhances stimulus-evoked norepinephrine release, leading to increased activation of vascular alpha 1-adrenoceptors and consequently to enhanced vasoconstriction. In the present study, the effects of several chemically distinct nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists were evaluated on pressor responses evoked by activation of sympathetic outflow through spinal cord stimulation in the pithed rat. Stimulation of thoracolumbar sympathetic outflow in pithed rats produced frequency-dependent pressor responses. Infusion of sub-pressor doses of angiotensin II (40 ng/kg/min) shifted leftward the frequency-response curves for increases in blood pressure, indicating augmented sympathetic outflow. Furthermore, pressor responses resulting in spinal cord stimulation were inhibited by the peptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, Sar1, Ile8 [angiotensin II] (10 micrograms/kg/min). These results confirm the existence of prejunctional angiotensin II receptors at the vascular neuroeffector junction that facilitate release of norepinephrine. The nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, eprosartan (0.3 mg/kg i.v.), inhibited the pressor response induced by spinal cord stimulation in a manner similar to that observed with the peptide antagonist, Sar1, Ile8[angiotensin II]. In contrast, equivalent doses (0.3 mg/kg i.v.) of other nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists, such as losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan, had no effect on spinal cord stimulation of sympathetic outflow in the pithed rat. Although the mechanism by which eprosartan, but not the other nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists, inhibits sympathetic outflow in the pithed rat is unknown, one possibility is that eprosartan is a more effective antagonist of prejunctional angiotensin II receptors that augment neurotransmitter release. Because eprosartan is more effective in inhibiting sympathetic nervous system activity compared to other chemically distinct nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists, eprosartan may be more effective in lowering systolic blood pressure and in treating isolated systolic hypertension.     

Losartan attenuates modest but not strong renal vasoconstriction induced by nitric oxide inhibition

Previous studies showed variable success of angiotensin II (ANG II) antagonists to oppose systemic and renal vasoconstriction during long-term nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition. We explored in short-term experiments whether the systemic and renal vasodilatory response to angiotensin II type 1 (AT1)-receptor blockade depends on the extent of NOS blockade. In the first series of experiments, anesthetized rats underwent clearance studies during continuous monitoring of mean arterial pressure (MAP), renal blood flow (RBF, flow probe), and renal vascular resistance (RVR). Compared with control animals, low-dose infusion of the NOS-inhibitor nitro-L-arginine (NLA) increased MAP and RVR, decreased glomerular filtration rate, RBF, and sodium excretion, and had no effect on plasma and kidney ANG II content. High-dose NLA induced stronger effects, did not affect plasma ANG II, and reduced kidney ANG II to approximately 60%. In the second series of experiments, we studied the effect of low- and high-dose NLA on autoregulation of RBF. NLA induced a dose-dependent increase in MAP and decrease in RBF but left autoregulation intact. The AT1-receptor antagonist losartan restored MAP and RBF during low-dose NLA but had no depressor or renal vasodilating effect during high-dose NLA. In summary, short-term NOS blockade causes a dose-dependent pressor and renal vasoconstrictor response, without affecting renal autoregulation, and AT1-receptor blockade restores systemic pressor and renal vasoconstrictive effects of mild NOS inhibition but fails to exert vasorelaxation during strong NOS blockade. Both levels of NOS inhibition did not importantly alter intrarenal ANG II levels. Apparently the functional role of endogenous ANG II as determinant of vascular tone is diminished during strong NOS inhibition.     

The effect of lead selection on traditional and heart rate-adjusted ST segment analysis in the detection of coronary artery disease during exercise testing

1. The present studies were designed to measure the affinity of UP 269-6, a newly developed angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, for vascular AT1 receptors from normotensive and hypertensive rats and to investigate in vitro, its effects on angiotensin II (AII)-induced hyperplasia and hypertrophy of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC). In addition the in vivo effects of UP 269-6 on neointimal proliferation in a carotid artery balloon injury in normotensive rats were also investigated. 2. UP 269-6 selectively inhibited [125I]-Sar1-Ile8-AII binding to vascular AT1 receptors present on VSMC derived from normotensive Wistar rat and from SHR (Ki = 16.6 +/- 3.6 nM and 7.5 +/- 2.0 nM, respectively). In comparison, losartan and its metabolite, EXP 3174, inhibited [125I]-Sar1-Ile8-AII binding to vascular AT1 receptors derived from both cell models with Ki values slightly lower (losartan) and higher (EXP 3174), respectively, than that of UP 269-6. 3. AII (1 microM) induced a weak and variable hyperplastic response (4 to 32% increase in cell number) in Wistar rat VSMC after 96 h. 4. AII (1 microM) induced a time-dependent increase in cell number in VSMC from SHR. UP 269-6 inhibited concentration-dependently this effect with an IC50 value of 159 +/- 58 nM. Losartan was clearly less potent and EXP 3174 showed nearly the same inhibitory potency, compared to UP 269-6. UP 269-6 (1 microM) inhibited nearly completely the action of AII. 5. AII (500 nM) caused maximal stimulation of protein synthesis in Wistar rat VSMC (117 +/- 36%). UP 269-6, losartan and EXP 3174 totally inhibited this stimulation with IC50 values of 28 +/- 6 nM, 3504 +/- 892 nM and 21 +/- 3 nM, respectively. 6. AII (50 nM) induced maximal stimulation of protein synthesis in SHR VSMC (237 +/- 67%). UP 269-6, losartan and EXP 3174 totally inhibited this stimulation with IC50 values of 16 +/- 3 nM, 282 +/- 122 nM and 3.3 +/- 1.0 nM, respectively. 7. UP 269-6 (75 mg kg-1 day-1) administered orally in the diet for 20 days induced a 38% reduction in neointimal area and a 36% reduction in neointima/media ratio associated with the intimal thickening induced by carotid artery balloon injury. 8. In conclusion, UP 269-6 was shown to be a potent antiproliferative agent both in vitro on AII-induced hyperplasia and hypertrophy of VSMC derived from normotensive and hypertensive rats, and in vivo upon intimal thickening induced by carotid artery balloon injury in the rat.     

Chronic effects of early started angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin AT1-receptor subtype blockade in rats with myocardial infarction: role of bradykinin

OBJECTIVE: The long-term effects and mechanisms of early started angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition post myocardial infarction (MI) are not well understood. Chronic effects of early ACE inhibition on hemodynamics, left ventricular diastolic wall stress and remodeling were, therefore, compared to that of angiotensin AT1-receptor subtype blockade in rats with experimental myocardial infarction. The contribution of bradykinin potentiation to both ACE inhibitor and angiotensin AT1-receptor subtype blockade was assessed by cotreatment of rats with a bradykinin B2-receptor antagonist. METHODS: MI was produced by coronary artery ligation in adult male Wistar rats. The ACE inhibitor, quinapril (6 mg/kg per day), or the angiotensin AT1-receptor subtype blocker, losartan (10 mg/kg per day), administered by gavage, and the bradykinin B2-receptor antagonist, Hoe-140 (500 micrograms/kg per day s.c.), administered either alone or in combination with quinapril or losartan, were started 30 min after MI and continued for eight weeks. RESULTS: Quinapril and losartan reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and global left ventricular diastolic wall stress only in rats with large MI. Pressure volume curves showed a rightward shift in proportion to MI size that was not prevented by quinapril or losartan treatment. Only the ACE inhibitor reduced left ventricular weight and this effect was prevented by cotreatment with the bradykinin antagonist. Baseline and peak cardiac index and stroke volume index, as determined using an electromagnetic flowmeter before and after an acute intravenous volume load, were restored by quinapril, whereas losartan had no effects. CONCLUSION: Treatments starting 30 min after coronary artery ligation, with either quinapril or losartan, reduced preload only in rats with large MI. Despite this unloading of the heart, structural dilatation was not prevented by this early treatment. Only quinapril improved cardiac performance and reduced left ventricular weight and this effect was abolished by cotreatment with Hoe-140, suggesting an angiotensin II blockade-independent, but bradykinin potentiation-dependent, mechanism.     

Hemodynamic effects of angiotensin II and the influence of angiotensin receptor antagonists in pithed rabbits

We investigated the cardiovascular effects of angiotensin II (AII) and the influences of four angiotensin receptor antagonists: losartan, PD123177, BIBS 39, and BIBS 222 in the pithed rabbit preparation. AII (0.03-10 nmol/kg) elicited a dose-dependent increase in blood pressure (BP), left ventricular pressure (LVP), LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), dP/dtmax, and heart rate (HR). The maximal hypertensive effect of AII is comparable to that of norepinephrine (NE), but its effects on LVEDP and HR are weaker than those of NE. On a molar base, AII is approximately 27 times more potent than NE. Propranolol (0.5 mg/kg i.v.) did not significantly influence the AII-induced increase in diastolic BP (DBP) and LVEDP, but it abolished AII-induced positive chronotropic effects over the entire dose range of angiotensin AII studied. Losartan, but not PD123177, shifted the dose-response curves for AII to the right in a parallel manner. BIBS 39 and BIBS 222 also caused rightward shifts of the AII dose-response curve. These experiments indicate that in propranolol-treated pithed rabbits AII causes vasoconstrictor effects in both resistance vessels and in the venous system, which are both mediated by AT1- but not by AT2-receptors. The AII-induced positive chronotropic effect is an indirect action mediated by the stimulation of postsynaptic beta 1-adrenoceptors. BIBS 39 and BIBS 222, two new nonpeptide angiotensin receptor blockers that have affinity for both AT1- and AT2-receptors are also potent antagonists of the cardiovascular effects of AII in pithed rabbits.     

Role of the alpha 1-, and alpha 2- and beta-adrenoceptors of the median preoptic area on the water intake, renal excretion, and arterial pressure induced by ANG II

The present experiments were conducted to investigate the role of the alpha 1-, alpha 2- and beta-adrenergic receptors of the median preoptic area (MnPO) on the water intake and urinary electrolyte excretion, elicited by central injections of angiotensin II (ANG II). Prazosin (an alpha 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist) and yohimbine (an alpha 2-adrenergic receptor antagonist) antagonized the water ingestion, Na+, K+, and urine excretion induced by ANG II. Administration of propranolol, a beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist increased the Na+, K+, and urine excretion induced by ANG II. Previous treatment with prazosin and yohimbine reduced the pressor responses to ANG II. These results suggest that the adrenergic neurotransmission in the MnPO may actively participate in ANG II-induced dipsogenesis, natriuresis, kaliuresis, diuresis and pressor responses in a process that involves alpha 1-, alpha 2-, and beta-adrenoceptors.     

bcl-2 expression in the spectrum of preinvasive breast lesions

This study was designed to define more precisely the relationship between specific angiotensin receptors and the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells in response to angiotensin II. These experiments employed quiescent A10 cells which were characterized as smooth muscle by the expression of specific contractlle proteins. Cell growth was monitored by measuring the incorporation of metabolic precursors into RNA or DNA. The treatment of A10 cells with angiotensin II (1 microM) stimulated a hypertrophic response as indicated by an increase in RNA synthesis and protooncogene expression in the absence of DNA synthesis. This increase in RNA synthesis could be blocked by PD123319, an AT2 antagonist, but not by losartan, an AT1 antagonist. RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that quiescent A10 cells express only the AT2 receptor while proliferating A10 cells express the AT1a and AT1b receptors in addition to the AT2 receptor. In addition, induction of AT2 receptor-mediated RNA synthesis was prevented by indomethacin, a cyclooxygenase inhibitor. These studies therefore support a direct connection between the AT2 receptor and smooth muscle growth that is mediated, in part, by prostaglandin synthesis.     

Residues Val254, His256, and Phe259 of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor are not involved in ligand binding but participate in signal transduction

The role of the external third of helix VI of the angiotensin II (AII) AT1 receptor for the interaction with its ligand and for the subsequent signal transduction was investigated by individually replacing residues 252-256 by Ala, and residues 259 or 261 by Tyr, and permanently transfecting the resulting mutants to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Binding experiments showed no great changes in affinity of any of the mutants for AII, [Sar1]-AII, or [Sar1, Leu8]-AII, but the affinity for the nonpeptide antagonist DuP753 was significantly decreased. The inositol phosphate response to AII was remarkably decreased in mutants V254A, H256A, and F259Y. These results indicate that AT1 residues Val254, His256, and Phe259 are not involved in ligand binding but participate in signal transduction. Based in these results and in others from the literature, it is suggested that, in addition to the His256 imidazole ring, the Phe259 aromatic ring interacts with the AII's Phe8, thus contributing to the signal-triggering mechanism.